TLDR LINK

Hello i am a man. As a man i have needs. I will simplify.

A man has 2 needs: to keep his stomach full and his balls empty.

There is some truth in every good joke.

I think keeping our stomachs full isnt an issue anymore. Keeping our balls empty, was, since the beginning of time.

Now, since we live in a society (xd), we should take care of each other. Thats the entire point of a "social" species.

Now i ask of you DO NOT derail this post. Issues women face are talked about everywhere, this is a post where we talk about mens issues. I post this in PPD because i lurked here, and i have come to value your opinion. Certain mens subredits are just an echo chamber so i dont want to post there.

A society can be arranged in alot of different ways, hence we have different cultures and what not. A society, in whatever shape it happens to be in, serves a singular purpose, to help us organise ourselves to fulfill our reproductive cycle (this includes everything on maslows pyramid). I claim this on the basis: if societies dont fulfill its reproductive cycle, this society dies out.

Now i am aware that we are all individuals and even if we make some individuals purposefully fail their reproductive cycle (as is the case of men), the society will still continue to exist.

Now i know "but how are we making men fail their reproductive cycle?"

By forcing them to compete, in every competition there are winners and losers. Except in the case of men, a loser is out of the gene pool.

Even though the "but think of the children" is a logical fallacy, i still choose to say "think of your sons, god dammit".

While i am a hopeless loser born in a shithole, i am not stupid to not notice the imbalance of power feminism gives women.

Evolution intended men to be used as expendable tools, and women as factories for making a new generation of expendable tools ad infinitum.

It is good that women are not treated as factories anymore, i dont treat women as such anyway.

I ask only to not be treated as an expendable tool. But as a complete human being with all its needs (inlcuding reproductive ones, family ones and all others, as is the case with women)

You see in order to fulfil our reproductive cycle we have to attract a person of the opposite sex (duh xd). However since evolution made men expendable it only kept the best men (the others died or whatever). Over time evolution made women wary of what men they choose since choosing a "wrong" man ment death.

Since this is no longer the case for women Hurray! Good for them. However men are still being discarded. Infact as women became economically independent, men are discarded (while maybe not in armies) but in construction sites and factories.

If we want to achieve equality through feminism (or whatever other way to restructure our society), we must face this problem men face reproductivly. Think of your sons goddammit, this will affect them too.

Now if you think "its all ok, men are supposed to be used as tools, its the way evolution inteded", remember that evolution also intended that women be used as factories. If you think walking over the weak is a legitimate strategy to getting what you want>>> please stop being a psychopath<<<

Now, i want to get rid of prostitution, there is no debate about this, i bet no one here would want their daughter to work as a prostitute so please dont suggest this. Even if you still do suggest it, understand that prostitution doesn't address the core problem. Sure sex is good but it isnt enough.

If a man can buy sex, then that sex isnt the sex the man needs.

Think of your sons

Now, since evolution as a natural process made women the way they are and the algorithm by which they chose men, we cannot expect change to come in the form of a natural process. Meaning this change will take willpower. Everyone likes free stuff (thats why we develop technology, as a natural process), however this will take effort as it goes against evolution.

We have to ask ourselves, is equality worth taking evolution head on?

You know the whole meme "strong men make good times, good times make weak men, weak men make hard times", this cycle can be broken.

Lets look at why do hard times come in the first place.

Second law of thermodynamics states that any given system tends to its maximum entropy state as time goes on. We as beings made of matter, even though we are formed by a natural process, dont like infinite entropy (hence why we are hurt by burning flame and think that juggling chainsaws is a bad idea). So through iterative algorithm that is evolution, those who agreed that fire hurts and thought that juggling sharp objects is a bad idea, stayed alive. Those who could predict and use the properties of fire and sharp objects despite the danger stayed even more alive. Hence strong men made good times. Strong men also made Genghis khan but whatever xd.

Good times make weak men.

Men in good times dont die left and right and can afford to be thought of as something more than a tool to tame reality. As such some men might end up "less developed" in this regard in comparison to men of hard times. But dont take this against these weak-er men. Nobody liked hard times, hence why we changed them in the first place, dont think less of men for not wanting to be used as tools. Even though i am an atheist this is the perfect example that we can explain through an event in the bible "let he who is without sin cast the first stone". Stop treating men as expendable, especially women should not be the one to throw said stones since they themselves are not the one who will wrestle against nature itself. Men were the ones to wrestle the nature, not women, hence came strong men (while others died). Men shouldn't judge each other, but women should especially not judge men in this regard since they wont be the ones dying in the first place.

Weak men make hard times

While we can enjoy the riches of our ancestors, we have sort of come into the situation descried in some sci-fi stories. You know the whole "discovering ancient advanced long dead aliens with forgotten technology trope" well this is what happens with weak men. Men who forgot "how" to wrestle reality , either forgot or never learned in the first place because times were good. Now in the past as in the case with e.g. Rome the riches of the past made romans blind to realities while barbarians waited for their opportunity. While it is true that Rome bulit roads and baths and all the other stuff that the unwashed barbarians never heard off it fell in the end. However there is a critical difference between Rome and a modern contry. We have electricity and it allows us to automate systems. I am not talking about AI here. Simple if-then algorythims have been used since forever. We, even with weak men, can continue to enjoy good times if we DONT GIVE A REASON TO BARBARIANS TO COME IN THE FIRST PLACE. We can just give electrity to barbarians, we can give them a good life and they wont come. You see in the end Rome used violence through military force to take taxes from conquered provinces. While it is good Rome gave infrastructure to said provinces, these people would much rather live free than in a golden cage. Plus said cage wasnt that golden in the first place.

Unlike previous generations we can break the cycle, we can perpetually live in the good times with weak men. I mean most of this software we use is built by socially incompetent engineers who never touched a woman, weak men are not the enemy. the barbarians are. The enemy are other strong men. But if there is no strong men, there is no wars. Weak men dont like fighting. You see we build walls around cities not to keep enemies out, but to keep friends in (This is a quote from some movie about mongols and chinese and stuff where mongols get to live a comofy life with chinese, i forgot the name of the movie). Walls gave a safe space for all. The walls were the technology that allowed men to transition from SUPER STRONG MANLY "I WILL WRESTLE A BEAR IN THE FOREST WHILE MY CHEST GLISTENED IN THE MOONLIGHT" to JUST REGULAR STRONG ENOUGH TO USE SPEARS TO DEFEND SAID WALLS to STRONG JUST ENOUGH TO USE A RIFLE FOR THINGS to HELLA WEAK BUT CAN WRITE SOFTWARE TO GIVE EVERYONE A GOOD LIFE.

Walls here are a metaphor for technology, and "hotheads" arent the ones making it.

If we just pamper said barbarians there wont be barbarians anymore.

Now since i have proven weak men are not the problem.

Lets go back to the previous issue. Reproduction.

Its no secret nerdy men spend their time ignored by women.

While nerds work on maintaining "our walls", women are interested in Strong men... and this isnt helping maintain walls. You see if you reward a behavior you can expect to see more of such behavior. This is why men are "toxic" because women reward it.

Now i know i am screaming into the void when i say this, but women must change (xd i know)

Women must stop rewarding such behavior.

If we developed Africa they wont come as immigrants and ruin things here. Plus as a side effect Africa could also become like Europe.

While this is a suggestion, it is also a warning. You see it is only a matter of time the next Genghis Khan is born and then what, "Rome will burn again"? IT CAN STILL BE PREVENTED.

Now in the good times we can break the cycle. I am not the enemy, and if women still arent convinced:

Understand that it is Genghis Khan the one who will return you to your "evolutionary role" as baby factories.

We can still stop this. I hope. And even if there is no outside threat, shouldn't we stop treating men as tools regardless, but treat them as whole beings?

​

I have used a logical fallacy here called "a red herring". I have tried to get my point across that i want men to be treated as whole beings, but since it didnt work on its own, i tried to use the scary threat of Genghis Khan as a tool to focus attention away from the original claim, to change how women treat men from bad to good. The fact that i had to use such sneaky tactics speaks volumes of how dire the situation is for men.

Edit 1 spelling