TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

    • /r/AllPillDebate
    • /r/AlreadyRed
    • /r/altTRP
    • /r/AntiFeminists
    • /r/askFDS
    • /r/askMRP
    • /r/askRPC
    • /r/becomeaman
    • /r/BlackPillScience
    • /r/Chadfish
    • /r/Divorce_Men
    • /r/EverydayMisandry
    • /r/ExRedPill
    • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
    • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
    • /r/GEOTRP
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • /r/MalePsychology
    • /r/Male_Studies
    • /r/MenSupportMen
    • /r/MGTOW2
    • /r/MuslimRedPill
    • /r/newTRP
    • /r/PussyPass
    • /r/PussyPassDenied
    • /r/RedPillBooks
    • /r/RedPillParenting
    • /r/RedPillWives
    • /r/RedPillWomen
    • /r/RedPillWorkplace
    • /r/RPChristians
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/ThankTRP
    • /r/TheRedPillStories
    • /r/trpGAME
    • /r/TRPOffTopic
    • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
    • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

    • Artful Prudence
    • A Voice for Men
    • Alpha Game
    • Black Label Logic
    • Caleb Jones
    • Captain Capitalism
    • Corporate Machiavelli
    • Days of Game
    • Deep Strength
    • Dicipres
    • Donal Graeme
    • Female Misogynist
    • Free Northerner
    • Gaming My Wife
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • In Mala Fide
    • KillToParty
    • Kill Your Inner Loser
    • Krauser PUA
    • LaidNYC
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • NO MA'AM
    • Omega Virgin Revolt
    • Pook's Mill
    • Random Xpat Rantings
    • Red Pill Theory
    • Red Pill Wifery
    • RedPillDad
    • RedPillDoctor
    • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
    • Sigma Frame
    • The Feminine Woman
    • The Futurist
    • The Masculine Principle
    • The Modern Man
    • The New Modern Man
    • The Obsidian Files
    • The Power Moves
    • The Private Man
    • The Red Pill Room
    • The Red Quest
    • The Rules Revisited
    • The Spearhead
    • Troy Francis
    • Wintery Knight
    • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

Green Party UK leader Natalie Bennett spotted at Glastonbury festival supporting a favourite cause of hers

Fred_Flintstone

July 4, 2015
285 upvotes
/r/MensRights
http://imgur.com/zRPsqHd
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title Green Party UK leader Natalie Bennett spotted at Glastonbury festival supporting a favourite cause of hers
Author

Fred_Flintstone

Upvotes 285
Comments 94
Date July 4, 2015 2:58 PM UTC
(11 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/3c3w34/green_party_uk_leader_natalie_bennett_spotted_at/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/green-party-uk-leader-natalie-bennett-spotted-at.976214
https://theredarchive.com/post/976214
Top posts by Fred_Flintstone

Stoic guy tells girlfriend she isn't 'his', and that if she cheats he wouldn't get overly emotional about it. Her brain has total meltdown. Reason: He indirectly (and without knowing) played a very powerful dread game card. Analysis inside.

442 upvotes
February 4, 2015
/r/TheRedPill

Girlfriend buys VIP pass then has sex backstage with celebrity. OP stays in hotel. Getting calls from her dad, OP's mother, OP's sister, all saying the sex doesn't count as it was with someone famous.

374 upvotes
February 16, 2014
/r/TheRedPill

Red Pill guides for High-end careers

344 upvotes
January 30, 2015
/r/TheRedPill

7 unique TL;DRs.

329 upvotes
March 27, 2012
/r/seduction

Cambridge student complaining about sexual assault risk. Halfway through the article she talks being sexually assaulted by a fast food worker. After reporting him police find CCTV footage of them just kissing for about a minute. Then compares herself to rape victims and questions society's motives

279 upvotes
March 1, 2014
/r/TheRedPill

Seddit just hit 100,000 subscribers a few seconds ago. What has been your favourite post ever made here?

253 upvotes
January 5, 2013
/r/seduction

I found seddit 18 months ago. I've learnt a lot since then. Here are some hopefully unique thoughts, warnings and tips for intermediate users.

253 upvotes
January 31, 2012
/r/seduction

Half the work of seduction is getting her to come back. So read this great guide on eating girls out [/r/sex xpost] [very NSFW]

247 upvotes
February 10, 2012
/r/seduction

Comments

[+][deleted] 11 years ago* (17 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]Fred_Flintstone[S] 57 points58 points59 points 11 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link

Did you vote for them before? One of their policies was that women should not go to jail except in extreme circumstances (murder)

[+][deleted] 11 years ago* (8 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]Lethn 16 points17 points18 points 11 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

I can't believe I actually voted for them back when I was younger :( this was before I discovered Libertarianism and Anarchism in my defence.

[–]Purp 8 points9 points10 points 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

before I discovered Libertarianism and Anarchism in my defence

Atlas Shrugged is summer reading this year huh?

[–]Lethn 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Actually I'm reading up on Marx, so I can lecture communists about where they've all gone wrong :P

[–]trakam 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

6th former, right?

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Objectivism is such an awful philosophy.

[+][deleted] 11 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]Lethn 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

HAH! Not a chance :P Not after I've seen the likes of Bitcoin in action.

[–]Knightsdawn -4 points-3 points-2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Fuck yeah. If I lived in America I would vote Ron Paul EVERY election.

[–]414RequestURITooLong 13 points14 points15 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

CJ381 Recognising the nature of the female prison population, with high levels of mental illness, experience of being a victim of crimes such as sexual assault and domestic violence, and caring responsibilities for children, the only women who should be in custody are those very few that commit serious and violent crimes and who present a threat to the public.

Yeah, that's fucked up.

[–]CeruleaAzura 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The Green Party are a joke. All those people who voted for them likely didn't read their manifesto and policies at all.

[–]migraine_boy -1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

Their manifesto also contained something about using animal transport in order to cut down on emissions.

I mean, sure... it'd be pretty sweet if we all rode around on horseback, but it's just ridiculous in this day and age for numerous reasons. Did they forget bicycles exist or something?

[–]delurkrelurker 6 points7 points8 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

There are other alternatives: Dolphin saddles. Seagull tethering systems. Badger chariots.

[–]usku 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I want a badger chariot. That would be awesome.

[–]jimmywiddle 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Well that will be a total of one vote they will get then....

[–]Blutarg 38 points39 points40 points 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Telling half the population they have no place in your coalition: a winning strategy!

[–]IlleFacitFinem 6 points7 points8 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Actually, men are only 49% of a two gender population in the UK, effectively making them a minority.

[–][deleted] 10 points11 points12 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Telling half the population they have no place in your coalition: a winning strategy!

There's enough retarded men that will vote for them.

[–]blamb211 3 points4 points5 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

We call these retards White Knights

[–]Krissam 115 points116 points117 points 11 years ago* (17 children) | Copy Link

Mansplain, verb.

The act of men speaking to women as they would to a man.

[–]redditorriot 55 points56 points57 points 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

It's sexist to treat women the same as men. Except when it's not.

[–]champzors 3 points4 points5 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Logic?

[–]blamb211 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Logic!

[–]redditorriot 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It used to be sexist to treat women differently from men. Now it's sexist to not treat them differently. The underlying fundamental is the same, they're oppressed, but it seems that those controlling the feminist/SJW narrative decided it's easier to increase the privileges without responsibility by reverting to the former view of sexism. Same way as seeing people for who they are rather than their skin colour is now a micro-aggression according to UCLA feminists/SJWs and other psychopaths.

[–]cortex112 26 points27 points28 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

So... gender equality?

[–]Krissam 16 points17 points18 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Yup, as the feminists keep saying "losing a privilege may appear as discrimination", in this case the privilege being spoken kindly to.

[–]Keiichi81 14 points15 points16 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

"Privilege is invisible to those who have it."

"Losing a privilege may appear as discrimination."

It's like it never occurs to them that their statements can just as easily apply to themselves. Mention "female privilege" and stand back as they fall over themselves insisting that it doesn't exist (how do they know, since privilege is invisible?) and then tell you how "discriminated" against they are because people are mean to them online (otherwise known as losing the female privilege of social insulation and being treated just like a man; e.g. like shit).

[–]forMyPCYo 8 points9 points10 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

holy crap what person wouldnt want me to be honest to them?

[–]SilencingNarrative 3 points4 points5 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

One that had some power over you.

[+][deleted] 11 years ago* (4 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]Blutarg 3 points4 points5 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Yes, and when has a feminist ever "regarded" someoe disagreeing with her as anytghing but intolerably rude, at best?

[–]5th_Law_of_Robotics 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

If it's simply being condescending why give it a gendered term?

[–]PlaidShirtz 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I thought mansplaining was when men just assumed women didnt know about a subject and overexplained it to them like sports or video games is an example.

[–]Krissam 4 points5 points6 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

No, according to the feminsts, mansplaining is when you explain something in a condesending tone, ie. how men explain shit to eachother.

[–]5th_Law_of_Robotics 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It kinda started out that way. Now it just means anything a man says that a feminist doesn't like.

They did basically the same thing for trigger warnings.

[–]redditorriot 43 points44 points45 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

'Progressive'.

[–]stemgang 41 points42 points43 points 11 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

Each gender treats the other as they want to be treated, not as the other wants to be treated.

So women "listen and believe" and ask men to do the same.

But men "explain and solve" because that is how we perceive and interact with the world.

Mansplaining is literally us trying to help solve women's problems. If it is not clear, this is loving behavior.

But women would prefer sympathy to solutions.

Hence the confused soul in OPs picture cries out to have her confusion mansplained away, but it never can be, since it is self-inflicted.

[–]ConfirmedCynic 14 points15 points16 points 11 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

But women would prefer sympathy to solutions.

To me, this is like someone sitting in a mud puddle and complaining about having a wet ass. Why the heck would they want to keeping on sitting in it and not only wasting their time but someone else's complaining, when they can just get the heck up and change pants?

[–]aLiamInvader 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Honestly, I don't know the full answer, but emotional validation would be a strong part of it.

[–]Lurker_IV 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-4EDhdAHrOg

Its a fundamental difference in men and women in how they deal with their problems. Women want someone to sympathize and be compassionate about their problem/suffering. They NEED the emotional group support more than they need the problem to be fixed.

[–]ConfirmedCynic 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

They NEED the emotional group support more than they need the problem to be fixed.

How did we ever survive as a species?

[–]Raunien 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Co-operation. Imagine if the sexes didn't work together. Women would supporting each other in achieving nothing, and men would be making leaps and bounds in killing each other.

[–]Fallout 4 points5 points6 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This is a fantastic way of putting it, thanks.

[–]Lurker_IV 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Agreed.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-4EDhdAHrOg

Its a fundamental difference in men and women in how they deal with their problems. Women want someone to sympathize and be compassionate about their problem/suffering. They NEED the emotional group support more than they need the problem to be fixed.

[–][deleted] 16 points17 points18 points 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

This is why I couldn't vote green, I'm very much a left winger however the left wing is full of these extreme feminists and it's just toxic.

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points9 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It often feels like the original left has been hijacked by totalitarians

[–]ThePigmanAgain 5 points6 points7 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Problem with the Left is that it is no longer the Left. Class issues have been pushed to the background while identity politics ( which pose little threat to the plutocrats ) have been pushed to the foreground. There simply isn't much left of the Left.

[–]Raunien 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

/r/socialism is a perfect example of this. If you want left-wing thought without privilege politics, try /r/truesocialism or /r/socialistbeta

[–][deleted] 10 points11 points12 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Wow, why even at a music festival? Like maybe some STEM conference or something at least but I don't even see the relevance. It seems as though she's just trying to be provocative.

Hardly surprising though. The Green Party have sexist policies such as being more lenient on women in prison and even letting them out of prison just because they suffer "abuse". Good to know the men's prisons are perfectly peaceful then!

{excerpt from Green Party manifesto on website, you can skip this}

CJ381 Recognising the nature of the female prison population, with high levels of mental illness, experience of being a victim of crimes such as sexual assault and domestic violence, and caring responsibilities for children, the only women who should be in custody are those very few that commit serious and violent crimes and who present a threat to the public.

CJ382 For the vast majority of women in the criminal justice system, solutions in the community are more appropriate. Community sentences must be designed to take account of women’s particular vulnerabilities and domestic and childcare commitments. The restrictions placed on sentencers around breaches of community orders must be made more flexible.

CJ383 Existing women’s prisons should be replaced with suitable geographically dispersed, small, multi-functional custodial centres. More supported accommodation should be provided for women on release to break the cycle of repeat offending and custody.

http://policy.greenparty.org.uk/cj.html

So basically, you have this fantastic legal system where months are spent examining every tiny piece of evidence, many people give testimonies, the situation is considered in full and after agonising over this a judge will finally decide the fair sentence after having considered everything. Then, the Green Party will allow women to walk free simply because of their gender.

On top of this, they propose investing to improve women's prisons due to all the issues listed. Despite all of these issue also applying to men, no additional money would be spent improving men's prisons.

Both Natalie Bennett and the Green Party are sexist and I would never support them unless they had major party reforms.

[–]ThePigmanAgain 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Wow, why even at a music festival?

There have been feminist complaints that music festivals are male dominated, and that includes Glastonbury. Just a guess, though.

[–]99639 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Disgusting... Men's prisons are also chock full of mental illness and victims of circumstance. This is the way it has always been as these are the people most likely to end up breaking the law and lacking the social support which would give favorable disposition and spare them prison time. Can't believe these people can be so blind to the gender neutrality of the issue.

[–]Imnotmrabut 9 points10 points11 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The Joys Of Glamping - being able to to take your hug box, scented candles and kiddies play paints with you to Glastonbury!

[–]funk100 8 points9 points10 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

What is she even trying to accomplish here?

[–]intensely_human 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Achieve temporary relief from hearing men speak

[–]FredPillington 6 points7 points8 points 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Every week there's a new petty way to be sexist...

"Tune in next week where Bennett takes a stand against urinals. If women can't stand up to pee then its sexist for men to."

[–]Fred_Flintstone[S] 4 points5 points6 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Swedish left party were doing that back in 2012 http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/06/13/sweden-left-party-toilet-stand_n_1590572.html

[–]marsmage 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

only if all toilets are fixed

[–]FredPillington 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Wow.

I'm speechless.

I guess these sacrifices must be made by us guys in the name of 'equality'...

[–]Knightsdawn 4 points5 points6 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

A socialist party led by a feminist? Makes sense.

[+][deleted] 11 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]Fred_Flintstone[S] 6 points7 points8 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Bwahaha great idea. I will post it there too.

[–]govt_took_my_baby -1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Have you ever heard her speak? It's not just her face that makes her punchable...

[–]xNOM 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I see they pass out crayons in the trigger-free zone. Is it also a clapping free zone, as well?

[–]Wargame4life 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

and they are going to enforce that how exactly? i would deliberately patronise as much as possible, and then point to my "bitch free zone" sign.

[–]GrandmasterSexay 3 points4 points5 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The Green Party are absolute loons. A major problem was that they were heavily against Nuclear energy, yet claimed they could be 100% renewable without it. Also their whole "Let's not emprison women unless we absolutely have to" shtick.

[–]TheCitizenAct 6 points7 points8 points 11 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

This woman is rancid, but it's worth noting she's also widely regarded as utterly inept. She advocated policies including giving EVERY single citizen in the UK £71 per week, as a stipend and to save on welfare administration costs. Conservative estimates put the cost at £240 billion. She also supported legalising membership of terrorist organisations like IS and Al-Qaeda.

[–]Fred_Flintstone[S] 5 points6 points7 points 11 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Everything youve said is absolutely true. But at the same time she also is the leader of the Green party. And the Green party were taken seriously enough to be voted for by a million people in the UK a couple months ago.

[–]TheCitizenAct 4 points5 points6 points 11 years ago* (4 children) | Copy Link

I attribute that more to the disillusionment with Labour, rather than anything else. There is a growing, cretinous anti-austerity movement, however it's the type of movement that claims to speak for the working classes while spending an inordinate amount of time focusing on the rich.

They hate capitalism, they think it has failed - they are juveniles. They advocate Twitter societies, a society based around feelings and Michael Moore logic. Needless to say, they don't have an alternative to capitalism other than more paternalism, more social engineering and more public spending. They also ignore the fact capitalism has dragged hundreds of millions of people out of poverty (47% of people lived on less than $1.25 per day in the 90's, that stands at 22% today), and is the economic model utilised by every single advanced democracy and civilisation the world over.

They see the UK accounts for 7% of GLOBAL spending on welfare and still they label cuts as 'fascist' or 'oppressive.' To them, UKIP or the Conservatives are the precise equivalent of a tyrannical madman who laid claim to the entire European continent and massacred 6 million Jewish people. Check your average article on the Guardian, or do a search on Twitter (both are refuges for Green voters) and see how often Nazism is exploited to to make people conform to basket case economics, or prejudicial attitudes (like positive discrimination, or 'white privilege.')

Of course, they will put poverty reduction down to something like 'foreign aid', where we send £3 million to Colombia to 'reduce cow flatulence', or £400 million per year to Pakistan, a nuclear armed country.

None of the middle-class students who vote for her and her anti-austerity agenda have ever come into contact with a real working class person - like feminists, emotion is their fuel and logic is their enemy. This culture is reinforced by 'safe' University campuses, if you look at the stats Universities play host to a disproportionate level of Labour and Green Party voters, much like the BBC. https://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/news/almost-half-of-sector-to-back-labour-the-election-poll-suggests/2019944.article

[–]Fred_Flintstone[S] 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Great post. I would give you gold if all this reddit stuff wasn't going on

[+][deleted] 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]TheCitizenAct 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Agreed. I simply mean if they can afford nuclear weapons then they can afford to foster distribution of wealth and improve social mobility.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

She also supported legalising membership of terrorist organisations like IS and Al-Qaeda.

She's a radical feminazi that hate men but supports organizations that literally are opressing women and treat them like shit, what the fuck why she isn't in a mental hospital? I hope that she will be kidnapped by muslims some day.

[–]TheCitizenAct 3 points4 points5 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's quite simple: to be opposed to Islam and all the western values it abhors (homosexuality, individualism, equal rights, etc.) would be to oppose multiculturalism. To oppose Islam would be 'intolerant', her ideology determines we must tolerate the intolerable in the name of tolerance.

She's another primary advocate of 'Islamophobia', a 'hate crime' which our once would-be Prime Minister, Ed Miliband, tried to outlaw pre general election and during an interview with MuslimNews. To paraphrase a quote which was wrong attributed to Christopher Hitchens: 'Islamophobia is a term invented by fascists, used by cowards to manipulate morons.'

She's far from being the worst though. Harriet Harman declared, again pre general election, it would be 'rude' to interfere with a Labour Party event segregated along gender lines to appeal to Muslim voters. What they don't seem to recognise while the debate the nomenclature the BBC should utilise when referring to Islamic State, is that 30 British citizens were just slaughtered by Islamic thugs in Tunisia, there are increasing cohorts of Islamic men in Northern towns preying on and molesting young girls based purely on the colour of their skin, parents are increasingly concerned about the Islamification of British schools (particularly after the trojan horse scandal) and we've played witness to the largest case of electoral fraud in the 21st century and in the UK's most 'multicultural' Islamic town, Tower Hamlets.

While they squabble over nomenclature and how much condemnation is the appropriate amount, people are gradually growing sick to the back teeth of the exploitation of social narratives like 'racism', 'xenophobia' and 'tolerance' to see through an agenda of imposing the world's most backwards and archaic value systems on western civilisation.

Here is a small sample of hundreds of surveys on Muslim attitudes towards a variety of issues, all of these values are antithetical to western civilisation (nonetheless, our culturally elitist, morally superior representatives won't pay a blind bit of attention while they divide and categorise the country up to shore up their own vote counts):

60% of Muslims would reject homosexuals as friends.

66% of Muslims believe that religious law is more important than the law of the land in which they live.

45% of Muslims think Jews can’t be trusted.

75% of Muslims believe there’s only one legitimate interpretation of the Koran.

45% of Muslims believe Western Civilisation is out to destroy Islam.

http://www.wzb.eu/en/press-release/islamic-fundamentalism-is-widely-spread

The survey was conducted across six European countries and solicited responses from 9,000 Muslims.

35% of young Muslims in Britain believe suicide bombings are justified.

42% of young Muslims in France believe suicide bombings are justified.

22% of young Muslims in Germany believe suicide bombings are justified.

29% of young Muslims in Spain believe suicide bombings are justified.

http://pewresearch.org/assets/pdf/muslim-americans.pdf#page=60

40% of Muslims want Sharia Law introduced in the UK.

20% of British Muslims (520,000 people) sympathise with 7/7 bombers.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1510866/Poll-reveals-40pc-of-Muslims-want-sharia-law-in-UK.html

An alternative survey suggests as many as 25% of British Muslims sympathise with the 7/7 bombers.

28% of British Muslims hope the UK will become a religious fundamentalist Islamic state.

78% of British Muslims support punishment for those who publish cartoons of the Prophet Mohammed.

62% of British Muslims believe free speech shouldn’t be protected when it offends religious groups.

68% of British Muslims support the arrest and prosecution of British people who insult Islam.

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/many-british-muslims-put-islam-first/

UK general elections are no longer won on policy. They are won on identity (much like feminism). It's not what you say, it's who you are, and it's only getting worse. Identity politics is tearing the country to shreds.

[–]intensely_human -2 points-1 points0 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Giving every single person money every week is called Universal Basic Income, and it is a very good idea and will become necessary as robots completely outpace all humans in every possible form of work.

[–]TheCitizenAct 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Meanwhile, back in the real world, our debt to GDP is 90% - thanks, Labour! - and our national debt is £1.4 trillion. Oh, and did I mention that our biggest public expenditure, pensions...the pot is running dry. It's nearly dry already. It's very unlikely anyone under the age of 30 will actually receive a state pension - it's an outright certainty they won't receive a state pension anything like what their parents receive.

Of course, even the debt to GDP ratio is invalid - GDP is just the total output of the economy, most of which doesn't end up in Government's pockets in the form of direct taxation. A more valid statistic is debt to Government income, which, as far as the UK is concerned, is far, far worse.

[–]iMADEthis2post 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

What a fucking scumbag.

[–]StandsInRefuse 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

GP are a joke anyway.

[–]ThePigmanAgain 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I hope she slips and falls face first into a cowpat.

[–]mostly_doubt_it 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Apparently the only time you are allowed to use "man" in a word is when it's an insult. Words like Chairman or manager though, that shits got to go.

[–]ThePigmanAgain 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You know, it occurred to me after another commenter asked, "Why music festivals," that this may not be an accident -- she may have chosen Glastonbury precisely because there have been feminist complaints about most of the acts at festivals, including this one, being male. The Guardian (who else) even did a piece in which they pointed out that the festivals were male dominated, that the charts were female dominated, and saw a problem only in the former, not the latter. I kid you not. So this idiotic (and sexist) sign may actually be a response to men who point out that festivals are male dominated because they tend to be rock-dominated, a genre more suited to the male voice than pop, and because those acts work cheaper than Taylor Swift does.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This type of stuff is why no Green party will ever be taken seriously

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

And that's why I stopped voting Greens.

[–]scanspeak 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Don't worry cupcake. No self-respecting man would want to be anywhere near you.

[–]rottingchrist 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

These are the kind of things women do when they're in power.

Shows you why they think a patriarchy is constantly "oppressing" them. They see men in power and expect them to have similar views towards women as they do towards men.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I stopped explaining women anything years ago, unless I'm asked to or if she's in danger.

[–]Raunien 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Yet another reason not to vote for the greens. I mean, whose interests are they representing?

Not socialists, that's for sure, they're social democrats at best.

Not capitalists either, with their restrictive (if well-intentioned) taxes.

Not environmentalists, as they refuse to back down on their anti-nuclear power stance despite the promising research into thorium fuel, and nuclear fusion.

Not men, clearly. Their crime and justice policies actively discriminate against men by caller for softer sentences for women, and nicer prisons for women, with a view to having no women in prison

Really, they only look out for women's interests. And then, only a subset of criminal or vindictive women who want to be able to get away with anything.

[–]Lethn 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm glad somebody understand the actual bullshit involved with stuff like Nuclear Fission, I'm an absolute advocate for genuinely safe Nuclear power that doesn't explode if the slightest thing goes wrong.

The idea though of essentially putting is ridiculous, how many more areas of earth do we have to make uninhabitable before people will stop trying to advocate Nuclear Fission? The next time some fucker lectures me about Nuclear Power being completely safe I'm going to tell him to walk to Chernobyl or Fukushima without a radiation suit.

[–]rg57 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Wow. If I was in the UK, that would have ensured I never vote Green. (And I have voted Green several times in the past, where I live).

[–]pnw_diver -1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

In almost all ways I am a total leftist, and "Natalie Bennett" just guaranteed I will never under any circumstances vote for the American Green Party.

[–]Raunien 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

They are not the same party.

[–]pnw_diver 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Noted on total reread. Thanks very much for the clarification, I was rushed yesterday.

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

They are a fucking joke party led by a stupid cunt.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter