How about men’s right to their own money?

ResearchHairy2319 · 2024-07-24T06:57:54+00:00

The only way to keep control of your own money is not getting married or having children

Common-Ferret-1435 · 2024-07-24T05:54:24+00:00

They don’t care. It’s about wealth transfer from men to women.

Simply never let them get pregnant. Interpret that however you want.

AdVivid9056 · 2024-07-24T07:01:49+00:00

It's even worse! You pay for them. But you are not allowed to see them. Raise them. Hug them. Show them your love. What do they learn? That a father ist just as good as much money he pays.
Equality is a very different thing!

jessi387 · 2024-07-24T05:37:23+00:00

Or our own children

AAKurtz · 2024-07-24T07:43:02+00:00

Women already have more rights to their bodies than men. We literally live in a nation that practices male genital mutilation and conscription.

mypreciousssssssss · 2024-07-24T06:02:14+00:00

Sorry, but she kept people in jail that should have been released to use them to fight wildfires. She kept an innocent man on death row. She doesn't give even a single shit about how men are treated in the legal system.

BackgroundFault3 · 2024-07-24T07:35:45+00:00

How about men's rights to being whole and not immediately circumcised upon being born, you know like the women that are protected by their very own special law?

Yoda-Anon · 2024-07-24T13:14:33+00:00

Your money is not yours, it belongs to the government, they just allow you to keep some of it to keep you from revolting.

walterwallcarpet · 2024-07-24T08:11:42+00:00

Female 'ethics'. https://jme.bmj.com/content/medethics/33/8/475.full.pdf

Men have no right to their own money. But women can dupe men, consign their genes to oblivion, and dip their bank accounts for eighteen years.

Seems fair/s.

greatfreight · 2024-07-24T10:31:13+00:00

Women have more rights to her man's money, than a man has over his own money.

2024-07-24T09:40:44+00:00

Men are just expected to be walking ATM a good portion of the time.

Few_Ad_5119 · 2024-07-24T07:35:14+00:00

On a related note, did I hear something about a state trying to make genetic testing a requirement with birth?

Anybody know anything more about that? I mean I can Google it but What I'm looking for is maybe a little insight.

Fearless_Selection69 · 2024-07-24T08:35:11+00:00

Per Reuters 2020. “Posts shared on Facebook show Democratic vice-presidential nominee Kamala Harris with former San Francisco Mayor Willie Brown, describing the image as “married 60 year old (sic) Willie Brown” and “his 29 year old mistress, Kamala.” Although the photo appears to be authentic, he was separated from his wife for more than a decade when he and Harris dated in the mid-1990s. Their relationship, which ended in 1995, was not a secret.“

I know this sounds off topic, but this is relevant information for the purposes of having common ground reference.

Kamala wasn’t just a sugar baby, she was a concubine.

So if you encounter any woman who say Trump is a felon, racist, ect…Tell them that Kamala sucked and fked her way to the top, literally.

Anyway, women will vote for the wrong person out of spite. Heck they’ll vote Hauk Tua girl for president.

LelouchviBrittaniax · 2024-07-24T11:42:54+00:00

Indeed, there should be no child support obligations for men, its her fault getting pregnant and her burden to carry.

demslearn2fish · 2024-07-24T13:41:08+00:00

If the decision to keep a child is solely in the woman’s discretion, the man should be by default off the hook for any financial obligations. This is literally the only reasonable position an intellectually honest person can have.

PROFESSA954 · 2024-07-24T23:34:40+00:00

If the government should have no say in whether the child is born or not then why should They have a say in if the father will be financially involved?

I agree that it's morally wrong for a father to just abandon a mother with a child but You can't have Your cake and eat it too. Either the government has a say in what happens with the kid or They don't. Having the government force men to be fathers but not forcing women to be mothers, and not punishing women properly for lying about who the father is isn't equal.

Either both should get to escape the responsibility of parenthood or neither should.

UWontHearMeAnyway · 2024-07-24T10:30:08+00:00

Yeah it's completely messed up. Women can do with their body what they want. Awesome. But men are forced to work for the next 18 years, to gone that money for kids the system won't let them see. Women openly lie about the men, and the system believes them. Men say it isn't true, and the system disregards them.

women rights to their own bodies

So yeah, doesn't apply to men.

how about men’s rights to their own money

Screw that. It's about their rights to their own body.

Ambitious-Reach-1186 · 2024-07-24T11:13:14+00:00

And their entitlement to a man's money is so strong; if you notice they're all over the place complaining that men aren't asking them out or trying to take them seriously. And the fact that they know, they WE know their playbook as this point, taking our children, our money, our whole livelihood away, not for the purpose of her survival, but rather just to make us pay as heavily as possible.

generisuser037 · 2024-07-24T21:43:52+00:00

"what's yours is mine and what's mine is mine" -every woman who isn't the breadwinner in a relationship

HandsomeJack44 · 2024-07-24T08:15:03+00:00

How about women's rights to reading comprehension.

The Roe v. Wade thing did nothing other than move the responsibility of legislation from the Federal government, to the state government. Nothing else, at all, whatsoever. Nothing was banned, nobody was out 'murdering women' or whatever the hell they keep yapping about.

The responsibility was moved from the right side of a desk, to the left side of a desk. An individual's opinion on abortion aside, continuing to freak the fuck out about the biggest legislative nothing that could have possibly happened just proves you can't read beyond what tabloid grade media rags are telling you.

AtikGuide · 2024-07-24T10:58:02+00:00

Not that sort of equality ! Women only want equality when it's convenient ! They don't want the responsibilities -- only the advantages, a double standard if there ever was one. Even the women who are simply feminist informed, or have had their views influenced by feminism, have this double standard.

CraftistOf · 2024-07-25T18:46:38+00:00

you really think a feminist woman will do something that hurts women and benefits men?

Kern_system · 2024-07-26T01:51:11+00:00

Because the government taxes child support.

False_Bookkeeper_656 · 2025-02-19T15:09:14+00:00

I'm curious why men feel like they shouldn't pay for the kids they make? Maybe make a ruling of no child support if she DOESN'T want an abortion but you do but otherwise, who is supposed to pay for the fact you didn't use protection or slept around?

2024-07-24T22:15:57+00:00

Thanks Kamala for protecting my 2nd amendment right to use lethal force and save my wife from death or permanent injury. Thanks for protecting my right to be a father to multiple children instead of a widower or single father 🫡♥️

mkautzm · 2024-07-25T01:50:30+00:00

Cards on the table here, I generally find the idea of 'men's rights' a kind of misallocation of frustration, but if I view this through a specific lens, I can see the frustration here and I'll take a good faith effort at answering the question here:

In short, the simple answer is: 'Abortion Rights' can be an on/off switch. 'Child Support Reform' is more policy reform. Policy reform is very expensive in terms of time and effort, and for better or worse, the squeaky wheel will get the grease, and Child Support ain't that squeaky in the whole scope of things. Compared that to drafting a law that says, 'Abortion is legal now' - It's still not trivial work when you consider what that means in process, but it's orders of magnitude easier than complex reform.

I don't know the laws around Child Support, but even if we'd agree that they are do for reform, it's a very hard thing to campaign with since the logistics of making that happen are very complex.

ObviousTower · 2024-07-24T10:30:42+00:00

Man, you are not wrong, but... Good luck with that!

Capable-Mushroom99 · 2024-07-24T13:40:35+00:00

I already pay for my children; why should I pay for other mens children just because they don’t want to?

DazzlingApartment0 · 2024-07-25T00:07:29+00:00

jesus mens rights is out of touch

RacinRandy83x · 2024-07-24T07:09:36+00:00

Financial abortions sound find in principle, but are you okay with government money being used to supplement the income of child support in that case?

lawdhavemercypls · 2024-07-25T18:27:23+00:00

You created the child. It is your responsibility to support the child financially. One minute, you all want full custody of your children. The next minute, you don't want to pay child support, money that goes toward the child. You can't pick and choose when you want to be responsible for the child.

clutchthirty · 2024-07-24T14:46:30+00:00

Child support is fine. Alimony is the problem.

True-Lychee · 2024-07-24T16:53:10+00:00

Fair-weather feminism

Title	How about men’s right to their own money?
Author	This-Top7398
Upvotes	261
Comments	198
Date	July 24, 2024 5:34 AM UTC (2 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1eatm6d/how_about_mens_right_to_their_own_money/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/how-about-mens-right-to-their-own-money.1525158 https://theredarchive.com/post/1525158

Comments