TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • Other

      • /r/AllPillDebate
      • /r/AlreadyRed
      • /r/altTRP
      • /r/AntiFeminists
      • /r/askFDS
      • /r/askMRP
      • /r/askRPC
      • /r/becomeaman
      • /r/BlackPillScience
      • /r/Chadfish
      • /r/Divorce_Men
      • /r/EverydayMisandry
      • /r/ExRedPill
      • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
      • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
      • /r/GEOTRP
      • /r/MalePsychology
      • /r/Male_Studies
      • /r/MenSupportMen
      • /r/MGTOW2
      • /r/MuslimRedPill
      • /r/newTRP
      • /r/PussyPass
      • /r/PussyPassDenied
      • /r/RedPillBooks
      • /r/RedPillParenting
      • /r/RedPillWives
      • /r/RedPillWomen
      • /r/RedPillWorkplace
      • /r/RPChristians
      • /r/ThankTRP
      • /r/TheRedPillStories
      • /r/trpGAME
      • /r/TRPOffTopic
      • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
      • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • A Voice for Men
    • Dalrock
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Heartiste
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • Return of Kings
    • The Power Moves
    • The Rational Male
    • The Spearhead
    • Other

      • Alpha Game
      • Archwinger
      • Artful Prudence
      • Black Label Logic
      • Caleb Jones
      • Captain Capitalism
      • Corporate Machiavelli
      • Days of Game
      • Deep Strength
      • Dicipres
      • Donal Graeme
      • Female Misogynist
      • Free Northerner
      • Gaming My Wife
      • Hawaiian Libertarian
      • Illimitable Men
      • In Mala Fide
      • Justice for Men and Boys
      • Kill Your Inner Loser
      • KillToParty
      • Krauser PUA
      • LaidNYC
      • Mensactivism
      • NO MA'AM
      • Omega Virgin Revolt
      • Pook's Mill
      • Random Xpat Rantings
      • Red Pill Theory
      • Red Pill Wifery
      • RedPillDad
      • RedPillDoctor
      • Rian Stone
      • RooshV
      • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
      • Sigma Frame
      • The Feminine Woman
      • The Futurist
      • The Masculine Principle
      • The Modern Man
      • The New Modern Man
      • The Obsidian Files
      • The Private Man
      • The Red Pill Room
      • The Red Quest
      • The Rules Revisited
      • Troy Francis
      • Wintery Knight
      • Woujo
      • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Support

Mom breaks down child support......

deconstruct2000

August 10, 2017
73 upvotes
/r/MensRights
http://imgur.com/izQ2QzA
Archived from /r/MensRights

r/MensRights is a community advocating for the social and legal equality of men and boys since 2008.

TheRedArchive is an archive of Red Pill subreddits and blogs. This page is our copy of the original post.

/r/MensRights archive

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Support the archive

Everything here was supposed to disappear. Banned subreddits, deleted communities, cancelled blogs — much of what is archived here survives nowhere else.

It stays free — no paywall, no account — for the next man who comes looking, the way it was free for you.

I pay for the servers, the storage and the bandwidth myself. If you want this record still standing in ten years, become one of the people who keeps it online.

Support the archive

Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title Mom breaks down child support......
Author

deconstruct2000

Upvotes 73
Comments 80
Date August 10, 2017 10:27 PM UTC
(9 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/6swwec/mom_breaks_down_child_support/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/mom-breaks-down-child-support.1176057
https://theredarchive.com/post/1176057
Top posts by deconstruct2000

Men cause 100% of pregnancies (Saw this on FB, had to share!)

29 upvotes
December 1, 2018
/r/MensRights

You ever get a bad feeling about a woman a friend or family member is dating?

6 upvotes
August 2, 2019
/r/MensRights

Comments

[–]DanPlaysVGames 66 points67 points68 points 9 years ago (16 children) | Copy Link

Do these people think child support means paying 100% for kids? It's child support, not child cover every expense.

[–]deconstruct2000 38 points39 points40 points 9 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

Yeah, I agree. There is a lot we dont know about this situation. I have to say $140 a week for food per kid seems WAY too high......

[–]orphen21 16 points17 points18 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I spend less than $100 a week to feed 2 people (fiance and myself) and two cats. There's no reason to spend that much per child per week.

[–]MotherFuckin-Oedipus 7 points8 points9 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

My wife and I get by on roughly $200 per month for grocery budget. We do go out once weekly, so maybe I have to add $30 to that, but still...

[–]Nemobeenfound 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Would say it depends on the age of the kid. As I can see that if its a baby, as things like diapers add up.

[–]omegaphallic 12 points13 points14 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Like we don't know how much HE spends on his kids outside of the $600, if they are passing notes along from the Father its safe to say they spend part of the time with him, so he pays for food then, rent for shelter, and who knows what else.

Personally whatever he spends on the kids like clothing, food, and so on should be deducted from child support.

[–]Mythandros 9 points10 points11 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Methinks there is a LOT of "creative" math going on here so she can attempt to make herself look like the better parent. And that is a terrible note to write your kids.

[–]lumberjackadam 7 points8 points9 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

She's also listing combined gas & power @ $370/mo. That's very high for most parts of the country. Combined with the iPhone bills,it seems like she's pretty injudicious with her money.

[–]Gixxertaylor 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I have a gaming rig hooked up as a 24-7 server, cook almost everymeal at home, run the ac for my pregnant wife in a 3 story home no less, etc etc... I think we pay 120 a month at 11 cents per Kw. So i guess if she was paying californian energy prices this might shake out as equal.

[–]nannuq 6 points7 points8 points 9 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

That is very much to high. I cook every meal, sack leftovers to work everyday and spend roughly $50 a week on food. I had grilled chicken, with grilled zucchini and an avocado/tomato salad for dinner. Leftovers for lunch tomorrow. This person's problem is an inability to budget properly.

I could feed a family of 4 to 6 people on what this idiot is claiming it takes to feed 1. She is entitled which is evident by her value meal and if I feel like cooking comment. She is most likely no longer with her x do to him growing tired of her childish behavior and failure to bring anything beyond stress and a vagina to the relationship.

[–]nick012000 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

$7 per Value meal

That's a meal from McDonald's. No wonder she's spending that much money, if she's eating fast food every day.

[–]X-Trem03 points 9 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

If my boy wants caviar for bf he gets caviar for bf!

[–]TroglodyneSystems 7 points8 points9 points 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

My ex sure thinks so. Complains that $2100/month barely covers 2 children's expenses in Texas. They're under 6.

[–]deconstruct2000 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Your ex is lying like crazy. My parents live in Texas, its a cheap place to live.

[–]TroglodyneSystems 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You, I, and everyone I know, knows that. But the courts are what they are, and that's what I'm stuck with.

[–]ThatNinaGAL 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Now THAT is unreasonable. I know daycare costs out the butt if you want a decent one, but half of that is her job to provide, either by paying for it, or by avoiding the cost by staying home until they are school-aged or having a relative provide the care.

[–]TroglodyneSystems 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Funny thing is, she lives rent-free, with relatives who watch the kids half the time. I know I got hosed. Her lawyer was slimy, mine wasn't slimy enough. I make good money, but my cost of living is much higher than Texas. I don't mind child support, they're my kids, but I also have to pay to visit them as well. That includes flights, hotels and rental cars. It's about $800-1000 a month just for those trips.

[–]HiredMind 46 points47 points48 points 9 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

560/month car = $30K+

$320/month on freaking iPhones??? Has she not heard of pre-paid plans?

Money is tight because she's throwing it out the f'ing window.

[–]Impossterble 11 points12 points13 points 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Inflate your expenses to make it look like you need more money for child support.

She also fails to mention her own income. We don't know the age of the kids(if they should be generating their own income), or who the 5th person is in the math.

[–]Mythandros 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

I suspect she is the 5th person in that equation.

[–]Impossterble 6 points7 points8 points 9 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

3 kids, 5 people.

$600 a month
$200 each
200x3=600
but all the expenses are /5 people. So either her "new man" or the kids have kids. But idk what age child support gets cut off.

[–]Mythandros 11 points12 points13 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Yes.. Her and the boyfriend.

Two additional people he should not be paying for.

[–]spight 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Presumably that's why she's cutting everything in half and calculating the cost per-child. The math checks out.

[–]Ted8367 34 points35 points36 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

She's just divided the rent by the number of people, as if each kid were an autonomous adult. What she should have done is allowed for her rent as if she were living alone; then taken just the marginal cost of the increased number of bedrooms the kids would need, as their share. You often see this scam with child support arguments.

[–]bakedpotato486 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Considering that she thinks his child support money is supposed to cover 100% of the child's needs, not 50%, shows how responsible for her children's needs she considers herself. That is; 0%.

[–]MotherFuckin-Oedipus25 points 9 years ago* [recovered] (3 children) | Copy Link

My mother did something similar with me - letter and all.

My dad had 100% custody and there was never a dime paid in the name of child support in my case, something my mother was always quick to point out. She felt she deserved child support for the few weekends she had me.

She would go on tirades about how unfair it was that she was expected to care for me when my dad wouldn't pay her to do it.

She was especially angry when I was a teenager. I would exercise 8+ hours per day and my daily caloric intake was on the upside of 6000 calories as a result, which admittedly can get expensive.

...The ultimate message she sent by whining about it, though, was that she only cared about money.

[–]Mythandros 4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Sorry to hear that. I hope you're okay now. Not a good lesson to teach kids.

[–]1493273 points 9 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

The father doesn't get child support when he only sees his child for 6 hours a week or whatever, why should she?

[–]Juan_Golt 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Dad with primary custody here. It's amazing how many people assume that I should still be paying child support.

It's based on the mistaken understanding that "If dad wants to see kids, he must pay." trope. Logically they assume that if I'm providing full time care, that somehow it equates to me writing a large check to the mother who gets every other weekend. TBH, they don't seem to think it all the way through.

[+][deleted] 9 years ago* (5 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]Historybuffman 10 points11 points12 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Holy shit.

[–]IronJohnMRA 8 points9 points10 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That is sobering. I feel for you man.

[–]deconstruct2000 6 points7 points8 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Dear god that's awful. How did that happen?

[–]Juan_Golt 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Similar thing happened to me in the early days. EX would demand all the parenting time in court and toss out unsubstantiated accusations as the justification.

The same day we leave court she's asking me to take our kid until 'tomorrow' but we both know that she's not coming back until the next court date. It was all just a game to keep the support payments high.

[–]Tone1337 -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This is why I took a 10/hr job...my ex gets $56- $80 a week and now has to give up her apartment, car, phobe, and owes light/gas payments

[–]neightdog 12 points13 points14 points 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

"$7 for a value meal or if I feel like cooking..."

Lol

[–]NibblyPig 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

"Here's some child support, if I feel like supporting my child"

[–]CuckKnight 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

If you consider that breakfast value meals are a couple bucks cheaper: $5 + $7 + $7 = $19. That's actually a 5% savings over the $20 per day, per kid it costs her for groceries. I would have never thought that buying groceries and eating at home would be more expensive than eating out.

[–]bluewing 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

It's not. Eggs, oatmeat, bread, bacon, peanut butter, milk, and cereals are not not that expensive per serving.

She evidently only buys pre-packaged convenience foods to "cook".

[–]emjaytheomachy 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Warm up*

[–]badhairguy 6 points7 points8 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

$600 for 3 kids? This guy must have the world's best lawyer or the world's shittiest paying job. I pay $1200 a month for 2 kids.

[–]emjaytheomachy 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Depends on the custody. I paid 120 a month (also had to pay for health coverage) and that was with 50-50 joint physical and legal custody. At that time I was making around 40k gross a year and the mom was not working

[–]Atheist101 6 points7 points8 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Why is child support paying for herself and her new fuckbuddy

[–]Tar_alcaran 6 points7 points8 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Jesus, someone needs to budget... $470 a month on water, power and heat? 5600 dollar a year on utilities? Does she live on a deserted island?

[–]orphen21 11 points12 points13 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Said that there are 3 kids, but the math says 5 people... Whose the 5th?

[–]deconstruct2000 17 points18 points19 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Im assuming a live-in-bf.

[–]IronJohnMRA 7 points8 points9 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Oh. That is some nerve on her part.

[–]sumfacilispuella 4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

shes showing how much she is spending per person. if she didnt count the boyfriend, the numbers would be higher, not lower.

[–]zurrain 4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I particularly like the part where she's pissing away more money on a car per month than rent and thought that was a reasonable thing to put to paper.

[–]mrwhibbley 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Take the monthly bills and subtract 40% for the mom and whoever the 5th person is. Then forget about the $500 car payment. Unless it's a Kia with 24 payments, she doesn't need what she's driving. Child support supports the children, not the mom and new guy.

[–]joedevice 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I bet he doesn't get more than 27% visitation though.

[–]CuckKnight 4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I hope this lady has stopped breeding. Intelligence is highly heritable and by the looks of her expenses breakdown, she wont be passing on much in the way of that attribute to her kids.

$560 monthly per kid for food is outrageous. If she is spending $20 per day on groceries for each kid, she must be eating tenderloin steak for each meal to include breakfast. She also must not be having them buy lunch at school (which is generally affordable since it is subsidized by the government). A reasonable amount to spend on groceries for each kid every month is $250, less than half of what she claimed.

$64 monthly per kid for the phone bill is the next outrageous thing. Thanks to family plan savings, it should be no more than $30 monthly per kid for the phone bill and $10 monthly per kid for the actual smartphone which does not need to be upgraded every year and can actually last three to four years.

$150 monthly for cable and internet is not a necessary expense. I could see something like $75 for basic cable and basic internet, but I'm almost certain that the plans she has include things like premium channels.

I'm also convinced she pulled the even $100 figure for water and $100 figure for gas out of her rotten fishing hole. No way do I see her paying $100 for gas AND $270 for electricity.

Finally, what about the tax breaks she gets for claiming each of her three children as dependents? Why didn't she factor that into her breakdown? Wouldn't that combined with the reasonable reductions in everything else make it so that the dad paid close to 1/2 of the total expenses? Oh I forgot, she's a moron who wasn't really trying to do an accurate breakdown of expenses. This bitter and entitled dumbass just wanted to whine about her perceived unfair disparity between her and her exes financial contributions while trying to pass herself off as being the snarky intelligent parent to her echo chamber of whiny single mom tumors.

Did you guys ever see this ABC investigation on the myth of the deadbeat dad (and the whining, dishonest single mom)?

[–]Juan_Golt 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

She's obviously the type of person who holds other people responsible for her own living standards. That she should not have exactly what she wants at all times is someone else's fault.

[–]Stripes1974 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The biggest issue I have with this is not about the child support-- though I do have issues with the (supposed) mother's breakdown of things.

It is the fact that, rather than speaking to the (presumed) father about this, she's ranting and basically cursing out the children in this.

What did the children do to deserve her vitrol?
And if she was going to have so much resentment about it, then she should have given the children to him.
This (presumed) woman may feel frustrated and overworked and underappreciated, but she's taking those feeling out on the children. That is wrong.

[–]MilesInLove 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Holy crap your living expense are cheaper, where can I get rent for $700 a month?

[–]Tar_alcaran 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The same place where you pay 470 a month for water, power and gas.

[–]deconstruct2000 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I was wondering the same thing. I have not had 700 rent in a long time.

[–]ionstorm20 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

North Carolina. I have friends living in apartments for 600-800 a month. Heck, if you don't mind factoring in the cost of taxes, you can mortgage a whole home for 800-1000 a month.

You'll be about an hr away from a major city, 2-2 hrs away from your pick of the beach or mountains and the jobs aren't terrible. The downside is that the pay isn't as great and if you have kids, there isn't a ton for them to do.

[–]merton1111 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's sad to see parents write improper english and swear words to kids...

[–]_lostdad 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Leaving aside that the figures seem to have come from Bernie Madoffs accountant. Practically all have missed one important and sad point - The letter is to the children, in answer to a gripe from him. She should not have brought the children into this. She should be taking her disagreements straight to the father.

All she wants to do with this piece of paper is devalue the father in the child's eyes. What sort of effect will that have? Additionally, it legitimises the fact with children that it is perfectly acceptable to pay a sum that equates to half the monthly rent on luxuries (iphones).

[–]orphen21 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This is a very good point. Children are crazy expensive when young, and get slightly cheaper to take care of as they get older.

[–]Juan_Golt 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Who spends $736/month on their car + insurance, when their rent is $700/month?

Perhaps invest in a financial literacy class.

[–]Luchadorgreen 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

But he also doesn't get to see his kids most of the time...why the fuck should he cover every single expense if he barely gets to see the kid grow up.

[–]Tone1337 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

According to her math...she makes waaaay more than her ex. Really, whats the problem? Oh, I know...he actually has good stuff and a good apt/house and car that you want.

[–]emjaytheomachy -2 points-1 points0 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

You can't assume that. I paid 120 a month in child support. The mom did not work and I made around 40k gross annual. That was with 50-50 physical custody (CS formula factored 182.5 over nights for each of us per year)

[–]Tone1337 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Im not assuming anything I am using her calculations. According to her the monthly bills in her house are approximately $5000. He pays 600 so she pays 4400 a month in bills. 3 kids is approximately 1/3 of his check so he makes about 1800/month before taxes and child support. If all her money goes to the bills she makes 4400/month AFTER taxes but before she gets his 600. This guy lives off of <$10,000/year he's a god damn hero!

[–]BisquitBill 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Now, someone give me one good goddamned reason to have kids or have wife.

[–]evg961 points 9 years ago* [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link

The fulfillment of starting your own family?

[–]BisquitBill 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You mean keeping men on the plantation?

[–]Dank_Meems 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

"Work my ass off"
Part-time front desk jobs don't count, sweetie.

[–]Momofteenageboys 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I am the mom of a 16 and 13 year old boys. We live in Northern VA right outside of Washington DC. The cost of living is extremely high. I would kill to have a 700 rent or mortgage. For a 3 bedroom town home or apartment, one can expect to pay 1600-2200 a month here. 1600 would be in places you most likely do not want to raise your children.

One could argue, we should just move to a place that doesn't cost as much. If I did, then I would be moving the children away from their father and family. That would not cultivate a relationship between them.

This month I have paid 1988.00 mortgage (which is less than what is would cost to rent out town home in our neighborhood). 289.00 electric. 75.00 gas. 90 water. 250 cable/internet/phone. 240 cell phone bill.

The cost of groceries have shy rocketed, and I am feeding two teenage athletes. A lot of nights, there isn't enough time to cook because the commute where I live is also insane with traffic and I get home around 7pm and then I am running around picking up the children from their activities getting home around 8-8:30. So grabbing something at a drive thru happens a lot. We all know how much a value meal costs.

To make spaghetti 2lbs of ground beef costs 14.00. Noodles, sauce, and other ingredients is about another 10.00. This is one meal not including the other meals and snacks they eat through each day.

Mortgage and food are the biggest expense each month.

Let's not even get started on gas driving them around or football and soccer items associated with their sports activities.

Their father pays 600 per month. That is 10.00 per day per child. And he thinks he should not have to contribute another dime to the children because he Pays child support.

Here is my question, 600 doesn't even feed them all month. What exactly does he think that pays? When school shoes clothes are needed he somehow thinks my bills decrease that month or the kids don't eat that month and I suddenly have an extra 500-800 to do it alone. These kids are in grown men size clothing and shoes. And it is not cheap.

He buys them One gift of xmas, because "he pays child support" and bdays they are lucky to get a gift. So child support isn't supposed to cover their daily care?

The fact is, custodial parents cover more than 50% of the cost associated with raising the children bc they see how far child support actually goes. In my case, not far at all. Although their father will speak as if he is supporting me somehow.

It ridiculous how someone will let their child go without because they do not understand the effects of not having 2 incomes in a household.

People will not ever understand it until they experience it themselves.

[–]bubbak427 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I feel like people are taking g this letter the wrong way. I don't agree with the way the child support system or custody system works but I do understand the reason for this letter. I was once a stepfather to two children who had an absent father. I was the breadwinner in the houshould and I saw him change jobs over 20 times in one year because they would take child support out of his check and he'd quit. He didn't want to support me. I was more than capable of taking care of myself and he never would have to worry about that. On the other hand, my brother has had 4 kids with 4 different women. He had full custody of 2 and split custody of one. The other one has a more than capable mother and he gets him on the weekends. The one that he has equal custody of has a manipulative mother. She split for 4 years after they got equal custody and started filling her head with all kinds of things to make her not like her dad. Point is, I have seen parents manipulate other people through their children. For the mother of this letter to take the time to write this, it is apparent to me that the father is the one not happy and using the kids to manipulate the mother. For a father to tell his kids that the money he sends to belong to them is unfairly involving the kids in financial matters that they should not have to worry about. We don't know how old the kids are in this situation. I wouldn't want money that I send for my kids to be wasted on junk when it could be used for their support. It seems based on the tone of the letter that the father has told the kids that the $600 should be an allowance to them and they have gotten the mentally that they are entitled to spend it how they please. We can guess closely that the kids involved are in their teens based on the language the mother used and the fact that they all have iPhones. If we assume 1-2 years apart we can say the kids may be 14, 16 and 17. Me now would not trust 14 year old me with $200 a month to do as I please. I think it's wrong for the dad to try to use the kids to manipulate the mother. He unfortunately has to send $600 a month into the household budget of his children. It is not his budget to be concerned with any more. As long as his kids are being provided for and he is not going to jail, that should be the end of it. Imagine the rolls reversed where the dad wrote the letter.

Tldr: mom is probably on the defense.

[–]ThatNinaGAL -2 points-1 points0 points 9 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

I'm guessing a mom with primary custody of three teens has an ex who has fully embraced the "fun dad" role and thinks his $600/month should buy treats for his kids. When they ask him for gifts, he gets resentful that his child support is going to necessities rather than being used for fun stuff - even though iPhones are undeniably a luxury item.

The mom draws a line in the sand about the bullshit, probably after about a million "do not discuss financial matters with our children" conversations with her ex. R/mensrights rushed to make the most negative assumptions possible about the way she runs her household, since it's impossible to criticize the actual dollar amount of the support order, which is waaaaay less than half the cost of maintaining three teens.

[–]emjaytheomachy 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Assuming a fairly common 80-20 custody order. That would mean the support order should cover 30% of their expenses (20% is covered during his custody time.) Now if you use actual reasonable numbers for food and utilities he is already covering that and then some.

[–]ThatNinaGAL -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

$600. 3 kids old enough to have phones. That's probably not even 30% of what those kids actually cost... but that doesn't matter. The courts say this man has to pay $600 and that counts as his half. So, he can let it count as his half, that's his right. What he can't do is tell the kids it's their damn allowance. It's his legal obligation, and it's minimal, and if she went back to court she'd probably get more. If she has the grace to make the $600 work, then he should have the grace not to shit-talk her to their children.

[–]emjaytheomachy 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Oh I agree he should not be discussing it with the kids. But neither should she. This is piss poor co-parenting. So both their methods are wrong. But proclaiming 600 is not enough is hardly accurate.

You can't just fiat she would get more. You have no idea what the situation is here. You literally do not have enough information to know if the amount would change or stay the same.

[–]_exitus_acta_probat_1 point 9 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

He certainly may legally say that so long as there is no court order preventing it. Recipients should be accountable for ther child support expenditures. This is one way of partially accomplishing that.

His "legal obligation" rests squarely on inequality in the family court, where each parent should automatically have 50%-50% equal shared physical and legal custody by default-of-law as a legal starting point unless either have been found guilty of a criminal offense proving that they are a bad parent to their children, which ultimately destroys the rationalization courts have to the predominantly male-to-female wealth redistribution known as child support, who's justification and entire existence is based solely on the access time differential.

Get the fuck out of here with your nonsense, woman.

[–]emjaytheomachy 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Unless she has sole 100 physical custody, why the hell should he the support order be for half the cost of their expenses? Please explain it to me.

[–]ThatNinaGAL 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Each parent is responsible for 50% of the cost of raising their children. I don't care WHAT the custody arrangement is - if either parent is paying more than half, that parent is getting screwed.

[–]emjaytheomachy 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

And given the information we have 600 sounds about right if you actually do the math. Assuming a 80 - 20 joint physical custody arrangement.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter