This Feminist Article Is One Giant Shit Test

fingerboxes · 2015-03-27T17:38:43+00:00

The whole 'entitled to sex' line is getting REALLY fucking old.

If TRP is fundamentally anything, it is the idea that men are not entitled to sex - we have to earn it by improving ourselves. If you aren't getting laid, it is your fault.

ExistentialDread · 2015-03-27T16:44:03+00:00

I'm really getting tired of hearing that traditional masculinity hurts men. How? Seriously? How am I, as a man, harmed by masculine tradition? Feminists constantly state this, without ever explaining how or why.

Also, the author of the article really needs to get over the fact that his dad never gave him any gay sex advice. Gee, maybe his dad wasn't gay and had no worthwhile advice to share.

TheThingsIThink · 2015-03-27T16:17:42+00:00

I like the "trigger warning" at the beginning of the article. This seems to be a big thing now. Don't do anything around anyone else because you might trigger some dysfunction they have.

trudatness · 2015-03-27T17:53:13+00:00

Mother of God...

This is quite possibly the most moronic beta bullshit I've ever read. 4 things you're not supposed to do with a contrived rationale behind them - followed by a false propaganda conclusion.

Here's what this shit really means:

Don't ‘Sow Your Wild Oats’

Stay a virgin until you meet the girl you will financially support for life so you'll develop severe oneitis and be at an extreme disadvantage.

(Meanwhile feminists are preaching female promiscuity)

Don't ‘Always Be in Control’

Be a beta chump who takes direction from women

Don't ‘Value Hotness (Traditional Measures of Physical Attractiveness) Above Everything.’

Date and fuck ugly women

Don't think ‘If She Doesn’t Stop You, You’re Good to Go!’

Affirative consent bullshit that requires you to continually beg for sex - and classifies any non-verbal consent as rape

This All Culminates in One Thing: Male Entitlement to Sex

Nope. This is "rape culture" bullshit. Nobody feels entitled to sex. Men feel that getting an attractive woman to have sex with him is a challenge (because it is) and feel accomplishment when we get it. We never feel entitled. We might be "shitlords" but we still like being desired by women.

This is a female superiority checklist. None of these thing are in a man's personal interest for long term happiness and fulfillment. Follow these 'suggestions' if you want to live a life of servitude and failure.

FrankWG · 2015-03-27T17:57:31+00:00

Opened, "Trigger Warning: Sexual Violence and Abuse", didn't read.

Just one observation on your post. "Yep, men like to be in control. You know why?"
Because we're fucking men.

BowlOfCandy · 2015-03-27T16:51:37+00:00

The power of the Internet for organizing Men’s Rights Activists, Pick Up Artists, and other anti-feminist groups has meant a surge in numbers of those who see feminism as “anti-male” or who despise the ways that feminism subverts patriarchal masculinity.

So MRAs are anti-feminist but feminists are totally pro-male? Blatant hypocrisy.

68461674897051454980 · 2015-03-27T17:50:23+00:00

op please change it to this link https://archive.today/3BNUA in your post to not give retarded websites more hits & ad revenue

HalfPastTuna · 2015-03-27T16:58:28+00:00

This article should be titled "ways to never get laid again"

HumanSockPuppet · 2015-03-27T18:16:27+00:00

Feminism itself is one giant shit test.

It's a little girl that wants an ice cream. She bitches and whines to her daddy, the REAL money-earner, until daddy gives in and buys her an ice cream to shut her up.

But it doesn't shut her up. Once she discovers that she can get things for free just by complaining, she'll keep on complaining about a birthday cake, and a Barbie mini-Corvette, and a pony, and a prom dress, and free birth control, and preferential hiring practices, and special maternity benefits, and selective welfare coverage for single mothers...until daddy finally decides to put his foot down and close his wallet. After all, daddy's the one enabling her.

The question is, when will he realize that he is spending himself into bankruptcy for a silence that will never come?

RU_Crazy · 2015-03-27T18:45:08+00:00

For me these articles boil down to a larger trend: the demonization of male sexuality and the liberalization of female sexuality. The current trend is to view any expression of maleness as inherently suspect while ostracizing anyone who dare criticize female expression.

Its no surprise this article goes on to criticize the normal male imperative while telling men to support the female imperative. They attempt to convince these men that their natural instincts are in actuality just sexist patriarchal programming. In doing so they maximize the number of willing provider men available to catch these women as they hit the wall and fall off the CC.

stuckinbathroom · 2015-03-27T19:26:10+00:00

I never understood the phrase "sow your wild oats". If you sow them, they are by definition domesticated oats.

Anyway, pedantry aside, quality feminist shitpost. In just the opening paragraph I can see examples of Open Hypergamy, angling for maximal liberation of female sexuality and maximal repression of male sexuality, and Sailer's Law. If I didn't know better, I'd guess it was a TRP parody of feminist "journalism". That's Poe's Law for you, I suppose.

Edit: just realized this was written by a (gay?) dude. Sailer's Law therefore does not apply.

midnightbean · 2015-03-27T19:55:12+00:00

I'm getting so tired of seeing this shit floating around my facebook and in real life. To the point I'm about ready to be ostracized so I can get the satisfaction of calling out the bullshit. Had to listen to a gay butch girl discuss her issues on her art thesis today, "I was growing up being told how I should act as a woman, what feminine toys to play with."

And I think oh poor you, suck it up you fucking piece of shit. If you're born abnormal, do abnormal things, you can't expect the world to just understand and cater to a minority. Really people should be glad they're different, it's actually a wonderful thing. But now so many people are so god damned weak we have to be PC and extra sensitive or were the horrible ones. And worse is it's only to specific issues society has decided and or manipulated to believe are the more important ones.

Moldy_Gecko · 2015-03-27T17:59:42+00:00

Firstly, while I support gay rights and the positive effects it will bring mens rights, what does a gay man know aboit male and female sexual interactions? You can't write an article about something you know nothing about...

Secondly, why is feminism praised, yet he slanders MRAs as mysogynist wife beaters? MRA is mens rights, not anti female rights.

I hate satire like this.

Yangel · 2015-03-27T18:03:45+00:00

Again, women don't want a guy who is constantly asking for permission to touch her here and there. When I constantly read about this ridiculous consent BS I'm always thinking about how most of our communication is nonverbal.

Learned this the hard way. Thanks consent indoctrination. :P

coffee_and_lumber · 2015-03-27T18:15:04+00:00

Figured I'd do the right thing and read the actual article first, got to the "trigger warning", said "fuck this shit" and came back to read the OP summary instead.

thedude122487 · 2015-03-27T19:51:12+00:00

Unless a woman is “hot,” she’s not worth my time.

Correct. That's the primary requirement that I have on my female partners, just like their primary requirements are that I have something to offer them that other good looking nice guys^TM don't have. They shouldn't be shamed for having those requirements, so why should I be shamed by the writer of this article for having my requirements?

TheThingsIThink · 2015-03-27T17:32:27+00:00

Number 5 is way off. If anything is true about the Red Pill it is that your not entitled to anything. You have to work for everything, no body is going to give you anything for free. If you give a girl a ladyboner and she is DTF NSA then you earned that shit with the hours you spent putting getting yourself to the point you can swing NSA sex.

We also realize that earning, or deserving something doesn't mean you'll get it. I may have earned the promotion at work, and I deserve it. But the company decided to scalp a leader from another company. After a couple of times of being 'next' on the list I've decided to leave. I need a job. Not this job.

All those words about work and deserving stuff also apllies to women. You may have a great bod, job, hygene, and witty humor, but if she selects another canidate, so what? What you going to do? Shoot the place up? No! Feminism seems to assume we should generate maxims based on the behavior of the mentally ill. It would be like us judging all women based on Snapped, or all the moms taking their kids "to the lake."

Some chick isn't buying what your selling try an other buyer, or keep tinkering your product until some one buys it. We are bringing water to horses, not leading horses to water. But if you can't make them thirsty they aren't going to drink.

Ties5o · 2015-03-27T19:14:46+00:00

So the author thinks that men like younger, hotter women, and want to have sex with multiple women- because we were socialized that way? Yeah, okay- let me take a hit of whatever you're having bro.

Kill_Your_Ego · 2015-03-27T17:14:54+00:00

This is an article that seeks to train white knights to act as a servant for women and to enact her violence by proxy. Expect to see many such articles and additional heforshe garbage to enact further controls on the men that lack of fatherhood (patriarchy) requires.

awfukbye · 2015-03-27T18:00:37+00:00

Why even acknowledge a feminist article? It's all garble and should be viewed/treated as such

Revive_Revival · 2015-03-27T19:00:45+00:00

When I browse these feminist blogs, sites, whatever there is a point in which I have to stop, go outside and think.

There are people that dedicate their life to this shit

There are people that actually believe this shit

I still remember the first time I saw a feminist blog, I just couldnt believe what I was reading, "It must be 4chan doing their thing again" I thought.

It's sad and I still find it hard to believe that there is people out there who believe in this crap, me? not even in my most blue pill days would i believe this shit.

It's really hard, there are men out there who read articles like this and feel proud when what they should be feeling is disgust.

Horrible, just horrible and evil, at least she nailed it with the trigger warning.

TimeToBugOut · 2015-03-27T21:24:58+00:00

HAHAHAH.... HOOOOLLLLYYY FUCK. I know the author of this article... I knew him intimately for a year or two. We went to college together.

AMA

af505 · 2015-03-27T18:07:41+00:00

Jaime wants to pretend that biology and psychology don't reveal massive differences between male and female composition. Jamie would like to rewrite the rules of engagement between men and women despite what evolution has proved works. And we need feminism because Jamie needs a speaking engagement.

mickeymouseoutfit · 2015-03-28T05:09:44+00:00

Good post OP!

One thing that always strikes me about feminist articles like this is the sinister Orwellian undertone that they share. Were it not for this aspect I could just laugh this off as another feminist shit test. I'd look at the perspective this "man" is shilling, possibly even cluck disapprovingly. But be OK with it if only for the fact that mangina beta white knight femboys are taking themselves out of the game and making things just a little bit easier for alphas and high betas who are awakened and have their finger on the pulse. In the short term these chumps are only helping us get laid by firmly ensconcing themselves in the executive washroom of the friend zone.

But this undercurrent of Orwellian social engineering that this article and those like it increasingly share is quite disturbing. It's not enough for these Useful Idiots™ to buy into deluded feminist thinking. No, they have to try to engineer a climate of hostility where men turn on each other for engaging in harmless male banter. That's just one slip of a white knight's jackboot away from squealing on your fellow man for such an offense to one's feminist masters. And that is just one slip away from squealing to actual authorities for perceived crimes that didn't actually occur.

The M.O. seems to be to stick their nosey nose into other mens' affairs and render a knee-jerk, sanctimonious, highly vocal temper tantrum should those other mens' perspective not be their own. To these beta buffoons I say, mind your own god damned business!

Jaereth · 2015-03-27T18:36:25+00:00

Nowhere was that actually explicitly said, yet every model in the media where much of my understanding of how sexuality would look demonstrated anything different.

Write much? Good god that entire thing is 10th grade level...

yesidoes · 2015-03-27T21:10:56+00:00

Check this guy's webpage.

He is a motivational speaker, selling this bullshit to make money.

I have a strong suspicion that he is following the 48, saying what others want to hear, duping feminists for their cash, and scoring loads of pussy on the downlow.

Reminds me of the biking enthusiast/activist from Oregon who ran into a shit storm a while back.

MrRexels · 2015-03-27T22:06:05+00:00

''Hmmm, I wonder what kind of article is this ...''

''Trigger warning: Sexual Violence and Abuse''

''Ow boy, here we go!''

SeekingAlpha · 2015-03-28T01:26:20+00:00

The Feminist critique of Patriarchy is wholly and utterly PATERNALISTIC ("we know what's best for you, so shut up and do as you are told.")

The irony, I love it.

BossSuperb · 2015-03-27T19:33:10+00:00

You should use http://www.donotlink.com/ with feminist websites.

mykonos_rm · 2015-03-27T20:32:34+00:00

Just so everyone is clear this article was written by a man.

Sir_Shitlord_focker · 2015-03-27T22:18:14+00:00

Did you take a look at the guy on Google ? Jamie Utt. Worth a look believe me ;)

falcon10474 · 2015-03-27T22:29:41+00:00

My favorite part was the white privilege explained in one comic at the bottom.

Flowhill · 2015-03-27T22:50:11+00:00

While I was reading this I sort of came to this conclusion:

A lot of stuff I read from a feminist perspective (as in feminist articles) gives me the following feeling: By coming up with all these arguments about what they think is 'wrong' with the current situation of society they are trying to shape society into what they think it should be like. But by doing so they completely ignore what society and personal interaction is really like. Next to completely ignoring the effects that their vision would really have on society.

These feminists somehow think that all sexual interaction is done without consent nowadays because often enough it is not verbally expressed (it is in fact often given through behaviour and body language), but by making their wish come through (making all consent verbal) they would totally eliminate all sexuality, all the biological cues that get people 'going'. And I can't, for the love of god, figure out why they do not see that this is completely wrong. Why would they want to create a society in which in the end they wouldn't be happy, complaining that there are no more "romantic/real men" that they crave so much.

Can anyone elaborate on this?

Sorry for the rant, but this got longer and longer while I was writing it.

TL:DR; In my opinion, feminists want to create a society in which they wouldn't be happy and I do not see why (they would want to create such a society)

PeteMullersKeyboard · 2015-03-27T22:53:08+00:00

I'm scared to read only because my blood pressure is already high enough today. I can only imagine.

Let me see if I can guess the bullet points without reading it -

1 - You know what's sexy? Commitment. You don't deserve a woman if you can't commit to her the hour you meet her. Only losers don't like being tied down. Are you a loser?

2 - You know what's sexy? Not bossing your girl around. That's rude, and sexist, and dammit, it hurts my feelings. It's sexist to think that you need to be the leader sometimes. It makes us feel unintelligent and marginalized. And it makes you an asshole. Are you an asshole?

3 - You know what's sexy? Guys who don't care what a girl looks like. Finding in-shape, thin girls attractive is not body positive and is discriminatory. Fat girls are hotter than you will ever know, because you're too insecure to handle one. Are you insecure?

4 - You know what's sexy? Asking permission for sex. It's so utterly traumatizing to be touched by a man (even if its someone I've been in a relationship with) that you should beg for permission to touch my unshaved, fattened body before even thinking about doing so. Otherwise, you're a rapist and a rape-enabler. Are you a rapist?

5 - In the future, maybe all men will be more sensitive and realize that they're really just all raping, bigoted, sexist, hateful bags of misogynistic flesh that need to be re-engineered for a modern society. I dream of a future where we've cut them back down to size.

What do I win?

through_a_ways · 2015-03-28T01:49:03+00:00

"Damn girl, you got a nice booty!"

An example of sexual violence

Merwebb · 2015-03-28T04:35:07+00:00

Kudos to you for reading all that. I couldn't. Fuck that kind of stuff

SoldierGenerale · 2015-03-28T04:46:02+00:00

I wonder if the guy who wrote this article has ever gotten laid?

Oh wait, looking at point 3 he does get laid. Only with the girls that are out-side of 'this tiny range of beauty'.

Merwebb · 2015-03-28T04:48:35+00:00

After reading the comments and skimming through the article it becomes clear: these creaturea want zombies to maintain them.

This "movement" just want to keep betas at their beta state or lower, these moms raising husks of men for the sake of other "women".

It just fucking clicked in my head. And a shit test, yes, anyone falling into this is no thundercock-affiliated. They do want the beta to pay for the upbringing of thundercock Jr, and tame thundercock genes into betadom. Im going full tinfoil here folks, the whole suit.

BlueFreedom420 · 2015-03-28T06:42:37+00:00

I vomited. World War 3 needs to come now. Then we will see betas enablers like this be put to death.

foomfoomfoom · 2015-03-28T16:29:33+00:00

Feminism is a shit test. Baudrillard defines femininity as "a challenge to masculinity to exist." The idea is that masculinity is the forces that imposes quality order in the world. Women challenge those orders so that weak orders crumble. The challenge isn't something to be given into or avoided. It's to be answered with more quality order. That doesn't mean "might makes right," but more like, "creating the kind of order that people want to be a part of." Shit tests imply the woman either a) doesn't know the quality of your will, and so is testing it or, b) doesn't think the order you have created is worthy. The second-to-last thing women want is to be leaders themselves. But the last thing they want is to have an unworthy leader leading.

BluepillProfessor · 2015-03-28T22:33:21+00:00

I need to be cleansed after reading that.

cover20 · 2015-03-28T05:18:31+00:00

Propaganda. Just the same old crap.

ExistentialDread · 2015-03-28T14:25:19+00:00

Yeah, seriously. I'm not being facetious, or playing devil's advocate here. I don't dismiss feminist arguments, or any argument, without logical analysis of the point's validity. If I am truly being harmed by "toxic masculinity", I want to know how and why so I can address this issue.

All I know from experience is that when I behave in traditionally masculine ways, things tend to go pretty well for me. When I try to be more empathetic and sensitive, life has a tendency to shit on me. I don't write the laws of human nature, but I do my best to understand human nature and act in accordance with that understanding.

CuddleMyNeckbeard · 2015-03-27T20:54:03+00:00

Why do you even bother reading that shit when you could be improving in the same time?

byronshadow · 2015-03-27T21:06:36+00:00

All of this messaging together serves to teach men that we are entitled to sex and to other people’s bodies. And this entitlement hurts everyone.

You can whine about men feeling "entitled" to sex all you want but you're not going to get betas to stop wondering why they can't find a woman in their league.

Distractions like video games are the only thing stopping the US from becoming like other countries struggling with surpluses of unwanted young men(See: rape gangs in India, unrest in the Middle East, et cetera).

MajorStyles · 2015-03-28T21:12:49+00:00

I stopped at the words "female body builder."

Next...

Title	This Feminist Article Is One Giant Shit Test
Author	[deleted]
Upvotes	145
Comments	119
Date	March 27, 2015 3:48 PM UTC (11 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/TheRedPill
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/30i2ri/this_feminist_article_is_one_giant_shit_test/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/TheRedPill/this-feminist-article-is-one-giant-shit-test.30697 https://theredarchive.com/post/30697

Comments