TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

    • /r/AllPillDebate
    • /r/AlreadyRed
    • /r/altTRP
    • /r/AntiFeminists
    • /r/askFDS
    • /r/askMRP
    • /r/askRPC
    • /r/becomeaman
    • /r/BlackPillScience
    • /r/Chadfish
    • /r/Divorce_Men
    • /r/EverydayMisandry
    • /r/ExRedPill
    • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
    • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
    • /r/GEOTRP
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • /r/MalePsychology
    • /r/Male_Studies
    • /r/MenSupportMen
    • /r/MGTOW2
    • /r/MuslimRedPill
    • /r/newTRP
    • /r/PussyPass
    • /r/PussyPassDenied
    • /r/RedPillBooks
    • /r/RedPillParenting
    • /r/RedPillWives
    • /r/RedPillWomen
    • /r/RedPillWorkplace
    • /r/RPChristians
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/ThankTRP
    • /r/TheRedPillStories
    • /r/trpGAME
    • /r/TRPOffTopic
    • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
    • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

    • Artful Prudence
    • A Voice for Men
    • Alpha Game
    • Black Label Logic
    • Caleb Jones
    • Captain Capitalism
    • Corporate Machiavelli
    • Days of Game
    • Deep Strength
    • Dicipres
    • Donal Graeme
    • Female Misogynist
    • Free Northerner
    • Gaming My Wife
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • In Mala Fide
    • KillToParty
    • Kill Your Inner Loser
    • Krauser PUA
    • LaidNYC
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • NO MA'AM
    • Omega Virgin Revolt
    • Pook's Mill
    • Random Xpat Rantings
    • Red Pill Theory
    • Red Pill Wifery
    • RedPillDad
    • RedPillDoctor
    • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
    • Sigma Frame
    • The Feminine Woman
    • The Futurist
    • The Masculine Principle
    • The Modern Man
    • The New Modern Man
    • The Obsidian Files
    • The Power Moves
    • The Private Man
    • The Red Pill Room
    • The Red Quest
    • The Rules Revisited
    • The Spearhead
    • Troy Francis
    • Wintery Knight
    • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

Is this study legit, it says 14% of college men have committed sexual assault

Wrong_Composer169

May 13, 2024
305 upvotes
/r/MensRights

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4484276/

They probably warped the outcome

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title Is this study legit, it says 14% of college men have committed sexual assault
Author

Wrong_Composer169

Upvotes 305
Comments 88
Date May 13, 2024 6:11 AM UTC
(2 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1cqsd5o/is_this_study_legit_it_says_14_of_college_men/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/is-this-study-legit-it-says-14-of-college-men-have.1518348
https://theredarchive.com/post/1518348
Top posts by Wrong_Composer169

Mensrights might be a lost cause

423 upvotes
May 22, 2024
/r/MensRights

Im so happy to see sexual assault towards men by women being recognized

261 upvotes
July 2, 2024
/r/MensRights

False accusations are actually common, despite the attempts feminists make to diminish it.

186 upvotes
July 12, 2024
/r/MensRights

Comments

[–]LOPI-14 286 points287 points288 points 2 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

Self-administered surveys were completed by 197 men in college at 2 time points, 1 year apart.

This thing is fucking worthless.

[–]Batbuckleyourpants 236 points237 points238 points 2 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

It's the same with all these studies.

Did you get drunk and have sex?

Do you have a penis?

It you answered yes to both then you are a rapist..

[–]Sintar07 57 points58 points59 points 2 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

Same way they get the ludicrous numbers for women supposedly experiencing sexual assault (1 in 5, 1 in 4, etc) you'll see feminists post:

-They ask questions in a self response survey the researchers think describe sexual assault, for example, "have you ever had sex after having one or more drinks," that can aboslutely describe consensual activities.

-They include scenarios that are edge cases stretching the definition, like drunk kissing, and still possibly consensual.

-They sometimes include cases that aren't sexual assault, for example, "have you ever had sex after your partner berated you or commented on your appearance" (they presumably are characterizing this as "coercion").

-When direct questions about rape or sexual assault are included, they are not used by the researchers to check if the person has been, but to see if they know they have. Women who answer "yes" to another question, but "no" to a direct one (which would indicate to most they were engaged in consensual activities) are recorded as women who were raped/SA'd and don't know it.

-They don't count non respondents (respondents are more likely to have something to report and want to report it).

In short, the sexual assault surveys are designed in every way to find the result that they want, even before accounting for the unreliability of self reporting. There are almost certainly similar shenanigans going on with this male survey.

[–]sakura_drop 106 points107 points108 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

JAKE was DRUNK. JOSIE was DRUNK. JAKE and JOSIE HOOKED UP. JOSIE COULD NOT CONSENT. The next day JAKE was charged with RAPE.

A woman who is intoxicated cannot give her legal consent for sex, so proceeding under these circumstances is a crime.

It only takes a single day to ruin your life.

[–]SodaBoBomb 13 points14 points15 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If you answered yes to the first but no to the second, that's how you get the "1 in 4 women" stat.

[–]ralphswanson 11 points12 points13 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

'Sexual Assault' is defined to include 'uninvited comments' and 'leering' in some of these surveys. Strange that 100% of men and women, aren't included.

[–]CConnelly_Scholar 3 points4 points5 points 2 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

The article actually has text and methods that you can read. You can take issue with the generalizability but the questions are actually very clear, and it's kind of wild the number of people self-reported what they did in this one (alcohol/drug consumption was one variable that they say is associated with assaults but they don't actually define assaults by it in this one).

[+]HotRaise4194 -1 points0 points1 point 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Isn’t it when the woman had gotten drunk?

[–]Spins13 208 points209 points210 points 2 years ago (24 children) | Copy Link

Likely loose definitions, ethics and no scientific method. From a scientific standpoint, if you did a study like this, it would be obvious to include women too an apply the same method.

This study is the equivalent of a cop planting drugs on the first suspect he has every time. The guilty decision has been made before any kind of thinking and you will do anything to make it look real.

Always ignore surveys too as they have no relation with science, especially paid surveys where you can guide the responses you want.

[–]Wrong_Composer169[S] 94 points95 points96 points 2 years ago* (22 children) | Copy Link

I did the math and 1% of men being rapists would mean there are more rapists than rape victims according to the FBI (40 rapes per 100,000 people a year), so yeah I can definitely tell something weird is going on

[–]BRS3577 3 points4 points5 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I think something like 70% of them are done by repeat offenders too

[–]Throwawayingaccount 3 points4 points5 points 2 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Well, there is a difference between sexual assault and rape.

If someone grabs a woman's breasts without permission, that is sexual assault, but not rape. Perhaps the reconciliation of these statistics is due to this difference?

[–]Vegetable_Ad1732 0 points1 point2 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

FINALLY someone said this!!!

[+]Wilczurrr -28 points-27 points-26 points 2 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

A vast majority of rapes are never reported as the police and legal process itself is also traumatic.

[–]Wylanderuk 15 points16 points17 points 2 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

And if that is the case and if its right that most rapes are done by serial rapists then some of the responsibility for further victims is on the none reporters.

While I can both understand and sympathise on not reporting, that does not stop it being true.

[–]Wilczurrr 0 points1 point2 points 2 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

The traumatized, likely depersonalized rape victim is partially guilty for rape if the rapist rapes another victim? Not everything is a choice, man. It's often not a decision of 'i'm not going to report cause I am scared' but more like 'my brain shut the memories and everytime i even think about the rape i go into a full panic attack, and otherwise am numb all the time and go about my day like a robot or internalize awful shit about myself and everything is burning'. It's better they report it, sure. But we cant talk about guilt when somebody doesnt even have the option to act otherwise, as the brain prevents it in order not to collapse fully.

Most of the guilt is on the rapist of course. And his friends of both genders who dont call him out, his parents who do not get him psychiatric help, the society, we can attribute it to many parties. Blaming the victim of all possible people is one of the shittest, most useless takes, as they have the MOST difficulty of all the mentioned to report it and MOST to loose if they do.

[–]Wylanderuk 0 points1 point2 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I said some responsibility, not guilt...They are not the same thing.

All of the guilt is on the rapist however some of the responsibility falls on the person that does not report.

[+]_friends_theme_song_ -69 points-68 points-67 points 2 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link

Well yeah that does make sense only about half of the victims do rape kits and only a third of those make it to the lab so yes there are technically more rapists than rapee's the math checks out when you think about yk people usually don't want to do a 10 year long court process for their assaulter to get fines and taken off of the NSOR in 5 years anyway

[–]PelicanFrostyNips 49 points50 points51 points 2 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

Your “math” completely ignores the existence of repeat offenders. Rapists who have several or dozens of victims each. Take Johann Eichhorn for example. Convicted of raping like 90 women in Munich. One could look at the amount of victims and think “there are 90 rapists in this town!” but it’s just one person. Nice try though.

Narrator: the math does not in fact, check out.

[–]full_brick_package 23 points24 points25 points 2 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

Gotta love how they just tried to spew feminist math nonchalantly.

[–]duhhhh 14 points15 points16 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

only a third of those make it to the lab

A third??? Gonna need to see some evidence for that.

Which ones weren't tested? When the sex is not in dispute (only the consent), when the victim refuses to cooperate (support going forward with a case), or when the perpetrator pleads guilty (so there is no need for the evidence) make up the overwhelming majority of the unprocessed rape kits. In these cases the kits are kept on hand for decades in case the situation changes for the benefit of these women, not hidden so the woman can't seek justice.

Sources :

https://www.mankatofreepress.com/news/local_news/agencies-with-most-untested-rape-kits-defend-practices/article_d594f3de-f07f-5542-996a-fea7ac1fa1aa.html

https://www.atkinsonlawoffices.com/unprocessed-rape-kits/

https://www.sacbee.com/news/politics-government/capitol-alert/article112639038.html

With political pressure and mandates that the backlog be cleared in a certain timeline because of campaigns like End The Backlog. That could mean people would have to wait a year for new kits that are high crime but low political priority ...

https://www.wtoc.com/2021/05/19/rape-kit-backlog-still-an-issue-georgia-labs-struggle-keep-up/

So, let's process them at catch repeat offenders, but let's also stop the propaganda that the reason is "misogyny" or "protecting rapists" and keep the priority straight - prioritize the kits where the evidence makes a difference in a current case

[–]Both_Advertising_429 0 points1 point2 points 2 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

Why you ran away? Come and answer them 

[–]_friends_theme_song_ -1 points0 points1 point 2 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

I don't support mens right anymore I now support gender equality

[+]Both_Advertising_429 2 points3 points4 points 2 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

You didn't had answer for him! 

[–]_friends_theme_song_ -1 points0 points1 point 2 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

I didn't had to ok

[+]Both_Advertising_429 2 points3 points4 points 2 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

WoW  You are really calm, 😁

[–]_friends_theme_song_ -1 points0 points1 point 2 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

It is the Internet why would I not be

[–]Both_Advertising_429 0 points1 point2 points 2 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

👍👍

[–]CordCarillo 123 points124 points125 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

These studies are why I can't buy into the "believe all women" trope.

They take sexual assault and use it ad an umbrella to cover any physical contact. She sobers up, remembers a shared kiss, or heavy makeout session and decides she didn't like it; sexual assault.

Hug someone who didn't ask for it in writing, wirh witnesses and a notary? SA.

[–]Juan20455 33 points34 points35 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If you consider "sexual assault", any kind of touching, including dancing near each other, yes.

Like the "statistic" about how many women were being victims of Sexual assault in college, that included everything from receiving a compliment to a (ugly) guy trying to flirt and that would put colleges more dangerous than the shittiest city in the world 

[–]Scarce12 12 points13 points14 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I don't understand how these institutions enforce gender pronouns, teach gender fluidity and sexual fluidity. 

 But when it comes to writing papers on sexual assault and domestic violence, it's decidedly gender binary and hetrosexual. 

How do they unify this?

This paper, if they did both genders and did sexual orientations, it may explain more about the sampling and methodology. 

[–]527east 11 points12 points13 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

So let me understand this. 14 percent of guys are 6ft or taller. Women don't see guys under 6ft. Those 6ft plus guys get access to sex. Then after getting sex from the woman and he won't commit to her...she doesn't see what she did was wrong and had to blame the guy for her actions and avoid accountability and look like the victim. There solved your 14 percent of sexual assaults at college.

[–]Sam__Toucan 37 points38 points39 points 2 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

"In college and community samples, rates of self-reported rape perpetration range from 6% to 15%, and rates of sexual assault perpetration range from 22% to 57% (Abbey et al., 1998; Calhoun, Bernat, Clum, & Frame, 1997; Koss et al., 1987; Muehlenhard & Linton, 1987; Rapaport & Burkhart, 1984; Senn, Desmarais, Verberg, & Wood, 2000)."

  1. Self-reported studies are generally rubbish as people who care about an issue are far more likely to respond than people who don't care

  2. All of the studies are over 20 years old, some as much as 40 years old!. So we are talking about the boomer generation rather than college students of today.

[–]sakura_drop 20 points21 points22 points 2 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

When it comes to college campus rates, specifically, we know how they manipulate these numbers for their desired outcome:

 

If the one-in-four statistic is correct—it is sometimes modified to “one-in-five to one-in-four”—campus rape represents a crime wave of unprecedented proportions. No crime, much less one as serious as rape, has a victimization rate remotely approaching 20 or 25 percent, even over many years. The 2006 violent crime rate in Detroit, one of the most violent cities in America, was 2,400 murders, rapes, robberies, and aggravated assaults per 100,000 inhabitants—a rate of 2.4 percent. The one-in-four statistic would mean that every year, millions of young women graduate who have suffered the most terrifying assault, short of murder, that a woman can experience. Such a crime wave would require nothing less than a state of emergency—Take Back the Night rallies and 24-hour hotlines would hardly be adequate to counter this tsunami of sexual violence. Admissions policies letting in tens of thousands of vicious criminals would require a complete revision, perhaps banning boys entirely. The nation’s nearly 10 million female undergrads would need to take the most stringent safety precautions. Certainly, they would have to alter their sexual behavior radically to avoid falling prey to the rape epidemic.

None of this crisis response occurs, of course—because the crisis doesn’t exist. During the 1980s, feminist researchers committed to the rape-culture theory had discovered that asking women directly if they had been raped yielded disappointing results—very few women said that they had been. So Ms. commissioned University of Arizona public health professor Mary Koss to develop a different way of measuring the prevalence of rape. Rather than asking female students about rape per se, Koss asked them if they had experienced actions that she then classified as rape. Koss’s method produced the 25 percent rate, which Ms. then published.

Koss’s study had serious flaws. Her survey instrument was highly ambiguous, as University of California at Berkeley social-welfare professor Neil Gilbert has pointed out. But the most powerful refutation of Koss’s research came from her own subjects: 73 percent of the women whom she characterized as rape victims said that they hadn’t been raped. Further—though it is inconceivable that a raped woman would voluntarily have sex again with the fiend who attacked her—42 percent of Koss’s supposed victims had intercourse again with their alleged assailants.

 

The public health professor named in the article, Mary (P.) Koss - who will be no stranger to a number of people here - has served as an advisor to the CDC, the FBI, and Congress, and is largely responsible for the severe legal bias regarding female-on-male rape and sexual violence in the US.

[–]PhantomBlack675 1 point2 points3 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Such a tragedy that this Mary wasn't Koss-trated.

[–]aigars2 47 points48 points49 points 2 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

This defines touching and speaking as a sexual assault and it's self reported, so I'd consider it very dodgy.

[–]EricAllonde 34 points35 points36 points 2 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Feminists in Australia did a big project to collect data on reported rapes from all the universities by filing Freedom Of Information (FOI) requests and collating everything they got back.

The result was shocking. By which I mean shockingly low. Just 1 rape per 45,300 students, per year.

That didn't stop the feminists doing a huge media push to shriek hysterically about the "epidemic of rape on Australian university campuses" and make the usual demands for political power & money, as well as more discrimination against men, stripping men of legal rights etc etc - all in a supposed attempt to fix a trivially tiny problem.

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/63kzcv/national_study_reports_the_total_number_of_rapes/

So when you see a study like this one, you can safely assume the feminists behind it are lying. It's just what they do.

[–]Wrong_Composer169[S] 4 points5 points6 points 2 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Agreed!

[–]Bubbly-Incident -5 points-4 points-3 points 2 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

If you agree, why did you post a study from 2004 and with such a deceitful title?

[–]Mod-ulate 7 points8 points9 points 2 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

My guess is someone used that study to argue a point that the OP wasn't ready to accept at face value, and they wanted some supporting insight to help them justify their perspective.

[–]Wrong_Composer169[S] 0 points1 point2 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

No i came across it

[–]JJnanajuana 17 points18 points19 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

14% admit to committing sexual assault in the last year

Likely some men did SA someone and didn't admit it.

But they used a modified SES survey, which is known to include a board definition of SA, including asking about alcohol consumption without asking about impairment levels.

There's also a lot of places where they mention that sexual assulters were more likely than not assulters to drink prior to, or during sexual intercourse.

And they say

When the male perpetrator is intoxicated, the cognitive impairments induced by alcohol make it easier for him to focus on the short-term benefits of forced sex rather than on long-term negative consequences

When the female victim is intoxicated, she may be unable to resist effectively because of the cognitive and motor impairments induced by alcohol

Which sounds like a long ass version of that poster where they are both drinking, so the girl is raped.

Would be interesting to detangle how many were rapists and how many were having (mutually) drunk sex.

They looked at a lot of other trends, that I would be interested in, if they didn't lump rape and drunken sex together.

[–]jamany 51 points52 points53 points 2 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Obviously not

[–]COMMANDO_MARINE 54 points55 points56 points 2 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Given how little you have to do to have it count as sexual assault it probably is true. I sexually assault women just trying to move off the dance floor to go to the bathroom as I try to squeeze past them. Sexual assault is just uninvited touching of a woman's body like we are all supposed to socially distance ourselves by 6ft in crowded places. You want to get past a group of girls in a crowded, noisy nightclub. Do you gently put your hand on their shoulder? Their waste? Or just shove them in the back? Then there's the women who like the look of you and don't want to let you pass or the ones who will just grind up against you uninvited because sexual assault doesn't apply to them. If you didn't fill out the 10 page consent form in triplicate before having sex with them, then it's sexual assault.

[–]DescriptionGeneral25 15 points16 points17 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I was at a festival one year ago waiting to see a really famous band from my country that was about to perform and before they started there was a disgraceful piece of feminist waste of oxygen on stage singing a song about basically how all men are predators constantly trying to abuse women in crowded places, she was singing something along the lines of "don't touch me if I don't want it, don't kiss me if I don't want it, I also have a right to be here at this festival". Guess what happened to me, a man, during the whole time I was at that concert? I was being CONSTANTLY touched by women without my consent, they put their hands on my back, arms, chest and shoulder as if nothing while trying to push me aside, and it might have not been anything sexual because they were just trying to pass, but that's not the point, they still were touching me without asking, and with other guys it was totally different, they always said "excuse me" and never touched me even once, all of this while that feminist failed attempt of a human was singing about how careful women have to be because all of us are some evil abusers. Not to mention the very few times I go to parties there's almost always some girl who starts twerking and shaking her ass right in front of me, if men were doing that exact same thing it would be sexual abuse.

[–]Admirable_Outside_30 42 points43 points44 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Well, is saying "Hi" considered sexual assault or complimenting a girl's new haircut considered inappropriate behaviour? These clowns are probably basing it on that

[–]DevilishRogue 6 points7 points8 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

From the study abstract: "Reported victimization and perpetration prevalence rates vary depending on the sample and question phrasing." The authors chose meanings to achieve the result they wanted rather than looking objectively at data.

[–]Inevitable-Island346 7 points8 points9 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Not surprised, considering saying hello is now considered sexual assault by many women

[–]Emergency_Wedding331 6 points7 points8 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Just another unscientific feminist hit-piece on men. Just ignore and move on.

[–]RevelationSr 11 points12 points13 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Does "sexual assault" mean she had second thoughts in the morning and changed her mind?

[–]SnooBeans6591 6 points7 points8 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

"participants were required to have dated a woman in the past year, to not be married or engaged, and to have lived in the United States for at least 10 years" - so its not a randomized sample. It is explicitly not random.

[–]MaxTheCatigator 5 points6 points7 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

There is no reliable survey in an environment where a certain type of response is socially required. The same applies to the moronic queries asking "who does more housework, you or your husband".

Not even when the questions are posed in a supposedly anonymous manner.

[–]Jaded_Permit_7209 9 points10 points11 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

So, feminism is a fairly rare academic subject. You see, studies in feminism that paint the worst picture tend to be the most cited, despite their methodologies. Feminist research therefore has an active interest in, when possible, skewing the numbers in a way that will make their study catch an eye.

When an academic field incentivizes exaggerated numbers, you cannot trust anything it has to say.

Time 1 participants were recruited for a study of dating experiences and completed a self-administered survey on campus. At this time, participants were required to have dated a woman in the past year, to not be married or engaged, and to have lived in the United States for at least 10 years.

Statistical fuckery #1: only men with recent relationship experience were considered. With a statistical average of 21.9 years for first-time participants, this disqualifies many men.

Time 1 participants were recruited for a study of dating experiences and completed a self-administered survey on campus.

Statistical fuckery #2: self-administered survey. What survey, you may ask? Well, that brings to us statistical fuckery #3:

Sexual assault perpetration was measured with a modified 12-item version of the Sexual Experiences Survey (SES) that includes incidents that occurred since the age of 14 (Koss et al., 1987)

I for the life of me cannot find this Sexual Experiences Survey they used, so for all we know, eye contact was considered a form of sexual assault. Keep in mind here that Koss, whose name pops up constantly throughout this study, is a radfem who believes that it is impossible for a woman to rape a man. So yeah, there's that.

Like, where is this survey?

Statistical fuckery #4:

Of the sample, 33% (n = 113) reported that they had perpetrated some form of sexual assault. The most serious sexual assault described by 15% (n = 51) of the total sample involved sexual contact: for 10% (n = 34), it was coerced sexual intercourse; for 3% (n = 9), it was attempted rape; and 5% (n = 19) had perpetrated an act that met the standard legal definition of rape.

First, a slight correction for OP: 14% of men have apparently committed sexual assault in the past year. The lifetime incidence is 33%.

33% have perpetrated some form of sexual assault. 5% completed rape, 3% attempted rape. Does that 33% figure fail the smell test for anyone else?

So, when it comes down to the actual legal definition of rape, we get a much more realistic number. Keep in mind here that sexual assault was not the legal definition of sexual assault, but rather the researchers' definition of sexual assault.

I think the biggest issue I have with this study is this: unless the researchers use identical parameters to investigate college-aged women, asking them the same questions and interpreting the data the same way, it's entirely worthless. Every sexual assault study that takes itself seriously looks at both genders' victimization rates. And on that note, let's look at a few:

https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/ss6308a1.htm

an estimated 1.6% of women (or approximately 1.9 million women) were raped in the 12 months before taking the survey

an estimated 1.7% of men were made to penetrate a perpetrator in the 12 months preceding the survey

Characteristics of Sexual Violence Perpetrators For female rape victims, an estimated 99.0% had only male perpetrators. In addition, an estimated 94.7% of female victims of sexual violence other than rape had only male perpetrators. For male victims, the sex of the perpetrator varied by the type of sexual violence experienced. The majority of male rape victims (an estimated 79.3%) had only male perpetrators. For three of the other forms of sexual violence, a majority of male victims had only female perpetrators: being made to penetrate (an estimated 82.6%), sexual coercion (an estimated 80.0%),

This would make about 42% of perpetrators of nonconsensual sex women.

Other years with similar numbers:

2010 survey results - https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/cdc_nisvs_ipv_report_2013_v17_single_a.pdf

2012 survey results - https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/NISVS-StateReportBook.pdf

2015 survey results - https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/2015data-brief508.pdf

Scientific American - https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/sexual-victimization-by-women-is-more-common-than-previously-known

data revealed that over one year, men and women were equally likely to experience nonconsensual sex, and most male victims reported female perpetrators. Over their lifetime, 79 percent of men who were “made to penetrate” someone else (a form of rape, in the view of most researchers) reported female perpetrators. Likewise, most men who experienced sexual coercion and unwanted sexual contact had female perpetrators.

https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2016/11/the-understudied-female-sexual-predator/503492/

a 2014 study of 284 men and boys in college and high school found that 43 percent reported being sexually coerced, with the majority of coercive incidents resulting in unwanted sexual intercourse. Of them, 95 percent reported only female perpetrators.

Any study that treats rape as a gendered issue is trash.

Credit for much of this information compiling goes to poster duhhh for his excellent post on the topic.

[–]IceCorrect 12 points13 points14 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Did you have sex with girl under influence? Yes - congrats you commited SA

[–]JayTheFordMan 23 points24 points25 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Pretty sure this is the one where they lowered the bar for SA pretty much to the basement, and then extrapolated the number of 'assaults' to number of men ie artistic license with both census and statistics

[–]LongDongSamspon 23 points24 points25 points 2 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

All these studies include things like drunken sex as assault.

[–]ezbyEVL 15 points16 points17 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If she liked it, romantic and deep experience

If she liked it, but regreted it eventually, then its rape and she's been abused when she was drunk (even tho they probably both were drunk)

[–]LowPressureUsername 3 points4 points5 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

His hip touched my butt in a dark and crowded room in a party! It must be intentional.

[–]Mad_Hatter_92 4 points5 points6 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Definition of sexual assault changes so frequently. If we used their definition - which often boils down to ‘sexual interactions which they were unhappy with afterwards’ then I’ve also been sexually assaulted.

[–]No_Table386 2 points3 points4 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Or have been falsely accused of it

[–]Sumbe 2 points3 points4 points 2 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

I believe if the exact same study was conducted on college women the numbers would be very similar.

This is probably normal human sexual behaviour regardless of gender, but the study is more media sexy when men are targetted and gets more reviews, because who would want or dare to publish a study on women being 14% rapists. No one who cares about their career, and even if they did it would be disregarded as bigotry, misogyny, or data manipulation etc.

Men get villified, women are victims. Nothing new under the sun.

Edit: The study would give better data on male sexual aggressiveness (which i believe was the intention here) if there were a women group and 50-50 male/female mixed group as controls. However they did not consider doing this. This study is merely reporting on the queationnaire results and how the answers are distibuted.

Basically I it's the same idea if prisoners were surveyed and asked how many of them have committed crimes and of what sort and results would say some percentage of prison population has committed a crime of some sort. The survey would not answer how does that compare to a control (e.g. people outside of prison). It would merely say how crimes are distributed between these inmates who have answered the questionnaire.

[–]EfficientSimplicity 2 points3 points4 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Would rape stats be 1/100 or 1/1000 if the woman was sober?

[–]BasicsofPain 2 points3 points4 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The definition of SA has been expanded to a point it has been rendered meaningless. SA can include: staring at a woman, walking on the same side of the street, approaching a woman in a public space, telling a woman “no”, engaging in consensual sexual activity the woman regrets the next day, unwanted compliments, essentially anything a woman “feels” is SA regardless of that activity meeting the legal definition of SA. These “studies” are beyond reason.

[–]SympatheticListener 2 points3 points4 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Such bullshit. If you agreed to the act, then changed your mind later, it was consensual.

[–]ezbyEVL 5 points6 points7 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

First, this includes unwanted kisses, and that can make this a chaos. A women can have a crush on someone, and if that guy kisses her by surprise, is romantic and they both fall in love, if the girl doest have a crush, then is assault, even if she acted the same in both cases, or is very close to you

If she likes it, is romantic and the steriotype of a prince, and if she doesnt, then is assault

[–]stinkydogusa 1 point2 points3 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

14% of the 197 students polled maybe.

[–]Chudsaviet 1 point2 points3 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Longitudal - 2 points 1 year apart. Ok.

[–]Vapelord420XXXD 1 point2 points3 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

100% of people have been "sexually assaulted." Getting your ass grabbed in the club is sexual assault.

[–]WannabeLeagueBowler 1 point2 points3 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The scientists are lying. They believe it's 100%, but they knew that wouldn't be believable.

[–]MrAnonPoster 1 point2 points3 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yes, if rape is defined to include "what the hell was i thinking when i decided i wanted to sleep with John? There is no way i would have done it! Oh of course! He assaulted me!"

[–]SnooHabits7185 1 point2 points3 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The biggest lie ever told online by angry feminists. That number is laughable. Why do women's groups have to lie so much?

[–]Lazy_Major_5106 1 point2 points3 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Sexual assault probably also includes 'the male gaze'™

[–]aBlackKing 1 point2 points3 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I don’t trust feminist studies

[–]Jaffacakes-and-Jesus 1 point2 points3 points 2 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

According to An Examination of Sexual Coercion Perpetrated by Women by David DiMarco and Ryan Savitz: "The weighted mean of those studies which were predominantly heterosexual indicate that, worldwide, approximately 17% of heterosexual women have sexually coerced a man sometime during their lifetime."

Both studies probably suffer from substantial self selection bias and the real figures are probably below 2% for rape and serious sexual assault and below 10% for the more modern forms (moderate is a relative term obviously).

[–]Wrong_Composer169[S] 0 points1 point2 points 2 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Can you show me this study

[–]Jaffacakes-and-Jesus 1 point2 points3 points 2 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12119-023-10102-1

[–]Wrong_Composer169[S] 1 point2 points3 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Thank you so much

[–]Arguesovereverythin 4 points5 points6 points 2 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

What you said in the title is not correct. The study does not claim that 14% of college men have committed sexual assault.

It says that of the 197 participants involved in a 4 year study at one specific school, 14% had reported committing attempted or completed rape and 34% had reported at least one act of sexual assault perpetration.

This study was published in 2004, so we don't know if a researcher would obtain the same results today.

The study cannot be generalized to all college men because the sample size is too small.

They claimed they modified previously developed questions from other published research for the survey, but they did not include the survey in the publication.

So, the claim that "14% of college men have committed sexual assault" is not supported by this research.

[+]Bubbly-Incident -6 points-5 points-4 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It says that of the 197 participants involved in a 4 year study at one specific school, 14% had reported committing attempted or completed rape and 34% had reported at least one act of sexual assault perpetration.

This study was published in 2004, so we don't know if a researcher would obtain the same results today.

Sometimes I wonder if these type of posts are made in bad faith, sheer ignorance or immaturity. Regardless, the sub should have more criteria and at least read what they're posting.

[–]Mahnonsaprei 2 points3 points4 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Sure, totally believable.

  • Hi, how are you?

  • HELP! HE'S RAPING ME!

Bullshit like this contributes to the unsafety of women, because when violence actually happens, no one will believe it anymore.

[–]MannerNo7000 2 points3 points4 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Rubbish

[+]living_in_darkness1 -21 points-20 points-19 points 2 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

until you find something fishy, apart from disagreeing with the result, I'd say it's safe to assume it's factual

[–]EatM3L053R 3 points4 points5 points 2 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Questions for you:

"Among the 343 men at a large urban commuter university who completed the Time 1 survey, 197 returned a Time 2 survey (57.4%)."

Do 343 men represent the whole male student body population? According to this survey -- a self administrated survey -- 343 men who volunteered for this survey (with a broad sweeping definition of Sexual Assault) it does askew the results into painting a negative portrayal of less than "5% of actual findings," who admitted to committing sexual assault; by the paper's terms

In other words this paper is too factually convoluted with bias to determine if their findings, placated with anecdotal suggestions, not facts, are genuine. So if you want something factual -- it's not found within this read.

[+]living_in_darkness1 0 points1 point2 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Alright, that's fishy.

[+]Wilczurrr -17 points-16 points-15 points 2 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Agreed. It's just a bunch of men giving expert opinion on what woman's lifes look like talking out of their ass.

[–]sakura_drop 14 points15 points16 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

No, it's because this isn't our first rodeo and we know how these kinds of statistics are calculated, especially when the goal is to demonise men, despite other evidence to the contrary.

[–]Both_Advertising_429 1 point2 points3 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Come back and reply him 

[–]Fredfredfred777 -1 points0 points1 point 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Not read the article but that's probably an average.

It'll be a small number of repeat offenders.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter