a man’s prime ends before a woman’s does

a woman’s prime is usually defined by two objective factors: her fertility and her attractiveness

whenever these two things are at their peak, which is pretty much always at the same time, is considered her prime

red pill men usually consider a woman’s prime to be from 18-25.

a man’s prime has no objective definition, at least that i have seen. whenever a man is describing a man’s prime, he adds a bunch of caveats such as “if he works hard, takes care of himself etc” then says it’s in his 30s, up until his 40s or later.

i would like to propose a clear definition of a man’s prime: the time it is easiest to attract a woman in her prime

before i continue, there is another point i would like to mention since it is also a key part of what i’m debating: men want to be with women who are attracted to them for who they are, not their bank accounts.

women are generally sexually attracted to men their own age.

the only advantage an older man has over a younger man in the dating scene is his bank account. men cope by saying women are attracted to maturity/stability/whatever but this is all code for a man with a good bank account.

so, why do i say that a man’s prime ends BEFORE a woman’s does? because he only has so much time before a woman is still in her prime but is also thinking more about her future, thus caring more about a man’s financial stability. so it’s not as easy to attract her unless he is financially stable AND sexually attractive. because he doesn’t want a woman who’s only with him for the financial aspect.

it’s way easier to find an 18/19 year old woman who doesn’t care about how much money a man makes than a 24/25 year old.

TLDR: if a man wants a woman who’s attracted to him for who he is rather than his bank account, and he wants an attractive woman as well, then the easiest time for him to find this will be when he’s the same age as the woman he wants to attract before they start caring about finances.