Inspired from this post on /r/askwomen.

The question was: "Women who played into classic female archetypes (i.e cool girl, manic pixie, dumb girl etc.) in real life but grew out of it, at what point did you realized that it was essentially a performance?"

My main question is:-

How much of female love is a performance? Why do some feel the need to act this way? How many women fall into this trap of not being themselves?

Some interesting answers:

In school, I played stupid most of the time because I thought that's what guys liked. Then high school and college was MPDG. Then my mid to late 20s, I was that soft, quiet girl trope who loves poetry and has been hurt too much so if you want to date me, you have to prove it by tearing down the great wall of china around my heart.

Question: Is this a performance or a case of an actual burned woman?

I was the cool girlfriend.You don't text back in a week and just drops off the face of the earth every now and then? No problem. You were probably busy, I understand and I won't demand anything from you so you don't think of me as a bossy....

What happened was I grew a backbone and realized that I should expect more from a partner. How can we be in a committed relationship and you just repeatedly zombie around/Don't value my time or plans with me/Respect me as a person?

Question: Was this really a performance or a case of low-self esteem? Or was it actually a performance she felt the need to play to keep the attraction of a man?

When I realized that I was basically ridding myself of all the things I liked to please a man who would never do the same for me. Not that I'd ever expect it or want it. I tried being the Manic Pixie Dream Girlfriend and it was exhausting.

This one seems to be the clearest for me.

However, there is this one which is interesting:

I was the cool girlfriend until I realized that I was only acting cool because I’m not actually attracted to men. With women I’m an uncool mess, my truest self.