TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

    • /r/AllPillDebate
    • /r/AlreadyRed
    • /r/altTRP
    • /r/AntiFeminists
    • /r/askFDS
    • /r/askMRP
    • /r/askRPC
    • /r/becomeaman
    • /r/BlackPillScience
    • /r/Chadfish
    • /r/Divorce_Men
    • /r/EverydayMisandry
    • /r/ExRedPill
    • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
    • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
    • /r/GEOTRP
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • /r/MalePsychology
    • /r/Male_Studies
    • /r/MenSupportMen
    • /r/MGTOW2
    • /r/MuslimRedPill
    • /r/newTRP
    • /r/PussyPass
    • /r/PussyPassDenied
    • /r/RedPillBooks
    • /r/RedPillParenting
    • /r/RedPillWives
    • /r/RedPillWomen
    • /r/RedPillWorkplace
    • /r/RPChristians
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/ThankTRP
    • /r/TheRedPillStories
    • /r/trpGAME
    • /r/TRPOffTopic
    • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
    • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

    • Artful Prudence
    • A Voice for Men
    • Alpha Game
    • Black Label Logic
    • Caleb Jones
    • Captain Capitalism
    • Corporate Machiavelli
    • Days of Game
    • Deep Strength
    • Dicipres
    • Donal Graeme
    • Female Misogynist
    • Free Northerner
    • Gaming My Wife
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • In Mala Fide
    • KillToParty
    • Kill Your Inner Loser
    • Krauser PUA
    • LaidNYC
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • NO MA'AM
    • Omega Virgin Revolt
    • Pook's Mill
    • Random Xpat Rantings
    • Red Pill Theory
    • Red Pill Wifery
    • RedPillDad
    • RedPillDoctor
    • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
    • Sigma Frame
    • The Feminine Woman
    • The Futurist
    • The Masculine Principle
    • The Modern Man
    • The New Modern Man
    • The Obsidian Files
    • The Power Moves
    • The Private Man
    • The Red Pill Room
    • The Red Quest
    • The Rules Revisited
    • The Spearhead
    • Troy Francis
    • Wintery Knight
    • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

12 year old uses adult dating site says she's 18. Meets a 25 year old, he touches her in his truck, next day she calls sexual assault. Thoughts?

macgarthur

February 11, 2017
32 upvotes
/r/MensRights
http://kitchener.ctvnews.ca/mobile/12-year-old-sexually-assaulted-by-man-she-met-online-police-1.3280225
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title 12 year old uses adult dating site says she's 18. Meets a 25 year old, he touches her in his truck, next day she calls sexual assault. Thoughts?
Author

macgarthur

Upvotes 32
Comments 92
Date February 11, 2017 2:25 AM UTC
(9 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/5tbmzz/12_year_old_uses_adult_dating_site_says_shes_18/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/12-year-old-uses-adult-dating-site-says-shes-18.932171
https://theredarchive.com/post/932171
Top posts by macgarthur

University and Dropbox women only job event

336 upvotes
January 30, 2017
/r/MensRights

Another woman goes to a barbershop and is refused service. Decides to sue.

197 upvotes
July 26, 2018
/r/MensRights

Apparently the Revolutionary Communist Party are also feminists

34 upvotes
February 22, 2017
/r/MensRights

In my region 27% of sexual assault claims are unfounded. Solution, look again until someone is convicted.

18 upvotes
February 8, 2017
/r/MensRights

No amount of money is worth what he went through

1 upvotes
January 23, 2020
/r/MensRights

Comments

[–]HeForeverBleeds 31 points32 points33 points 9 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Actually, apart from the lying about the age thing, my first thought reading this article is how it calls a man who "inappropriately touched" a girl sexual assault, whereas you have women having full sexual intercourse with boys this age and headlines more often call it "seduced", "sexual relationship", "affair", and "sexual contact" in the headlines and almost never rape or sexual assault unless it's in scare quotes

[–]kaliwraith 6 points7 points8 points 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

That's true and those women should be called rapists. Otoh, this guy is meeting with girls a decade younger than him. I'm pretty sure a 12 year old isn't fooling anyone that she's 16 or 18. Defending this idiot is stupid, since he very well may be a predator indeed.

Also this girl is probably a psycho either way.

[–]JebberJabber 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

A 12yo is likely to have been abused or neglected previously if they do any of the following:

  • Talk to a 25yo online, especially about meeting IRL.
  • Talk convincingly, dress and do makeup like a 16yo.
  • Actually meet a 25yo IRL.
  • Get in a car with a 25yo
  • Have any kind of sexual contact with a 25yo regardless of who initiated it.

The requirement is not that she presents as 16, it is that she presents as there being no chance of her being under 16. That is why in my country if you look less than seven years older than the drinking age you get carded.

This guy was not certain she was over 16. He sexually abused someone who had probably already been abused or neglected.

[–]kaliwraith 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Psycho is usually caused by things... The guy is either a moron or a predator, not someone I would defend just because women get away with worse.

[–]mwobuddy 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

How old is Carrie Fisher in this scene?

https://youtu.be/pW_xdftOspA?t=104

If your answer is anything other than 20, you're not a good judge of age based on look and sound of an individual yourself.

[–]JebberJabber 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Never mind sex, in the US many states allow underage marriage as a way to avoid abortion and scandal, it seems:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2017/02/10/why-does-the-united-states-still-let-12-year-old-girls-get-married/?tid=sm_fb&utm_term=.61964933f63a

[–]mwobuddy 16 points17 points18 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

She knew exactly what she was doing, because she did it precisely to entrap him and then call sexual assault.

She is demonstrating clear understanding of the situation and intent to harm him.

Did she suddenly figure out age of consent laws and sexual assault in 24 hours? I really doubt it.

[–]JebberJabber 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The report says she "eventually" went to police. Presumably after talking about it and getting adult advice. Twelve year old girls have been known to talk about stuff.

There is zero evidence of a plan to get him into trouble before they met. He drove her to a parking lot, there was sexual contact of some sort, then he drove her home. There is no evidence in the report of whether sex was planned before they met, or of who initiated the contact, or whether there was any sort of (non-legal) consent given.

[–]Imnotmrabut 12 points13 points14 points 9 years ago (40 children) | Copy Link

Always be asking for proof of age.

[–]tio1w 22 points23 points24 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If she shows fake ID you are still liable.

[–]macgarthur[S] 8 points9 points10 points 9 years ago (37 children) | Copy Link

This was the consensus on the comments on Facebook. I'm not defending the guy he should have been able to tell, but are we really getting to the point I gotta card my dates? I got one tomorrow should I be asking for ID?

[–]PepperTe 7 points8 points9 points 9 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

he should have been able to tell

Really? Yes, the average 12 year old girl is easy to tell as being very young, but take a 12 year old girl who is further developed than 95% of her peers, who also knows how to dress and use makeup to look older, and she can easily pass for 16 which is the legal age of consent in most of the US. And I also know some young adult women (18 to 25) who still look 12, especially those who have really small breast and butts.

Edit: I meant 18 to 25, not 18 to 15.

[–]macgarthur[S] 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Fully agree. He should have been able to tell but there are exceptions. This really feels like entrapment. Like she knew exactly what she was doing and baited some guy into going to jail.

[–]bufedad 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I was reading a news article a few years ago about a girl who had done this (with a myspace page... if that tells you how long ago it was) that stated she was 18. She would meet, have sex, then have them arrested.

She did this like 4 or 5 times... and the parents refused to make her take down the myspace page.

[–]Imnotmrabut 5 points6 points7 points 9 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Ask for ID supplied by the government. I believe there is applicable US case law linked to Traci Lords. If they are good enough to dupe the government, Uncle Sam is your defence!

It's that, or only date those who have been formally dated by an expert Dendrochronologist.

[–]PepperTe 7 points8 points9 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Uncle Sam is your defence!

Doesn't work. There is at least one case where a girl got a legitimate ID from the government that had her wrong age on it, and used it to have sex (was a porn shoot I think). Even though they kept records of her providing proof of being 18, the guy was still charged because she was too young to consent and her having an id and lying about it does not count as consent. Strict liability means no excuses.

[–]Heavycamera 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That is insane. I can't think of a better definition of "entrapment".

[–]Diesel-66 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The producers of her movies went to prison. They used that argument and it didn't mean shit.

[–]420weedscopes 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Uncle Sam doesn't really help much in Canada eh. We have different laws

[–]ZilgornZeypher 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Dendrochronologist

Thanks I learned something new today... had to look that one up

[–]Imnotmrabut 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

P¬))

[–]DarthRoacho 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

Soon, it will be legally binding contracts. That's the world we face.

[–]mwobuddy 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

The entire notion of consent is comparable to legal contractual agreements in the first place, as https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/French_petition_against_age_of_consent_laws

Foucault, et al, would claim. And they're right.

If the notion of explicit of 'enthusiastic' consent goes through legally, then if you make a move on a woman, touch her without asking, and she goes down on you, swallows your cum, lets you bore her anus out, and then calls you tomorrow for more, she would STILL be able to cry sexual assault 10 years down the road because the DA will ask you "did you ask for consent?" and you will have to answer "no', and it would be case closed under "explicit verbal consent/enthusiastic consent" rules.

[–]manicmonkeys 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

What I always want to ask is, what if (in this hypothetical) you simply say you never gave consent and want to have her charged with rape?

[–]mwobuddy 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Given the very well known history of women 'getting away' with 'child molesting/rape' with extremely diminutive sentencing compared to men, it'd likely be what is referred to in tic-tac-toe as a 'cat's game'.. the male is the presumed sexual aggressor/initiator in our society, so if you claim you didn't give consent, it falls to questions of who 'aggressively' touched who first. Who moved their hand into the other's space first, etc, and if it was the woman questions of her mental competency and understanding of what she did would start to come into question.

Basically looking for any excuse as to why the woman is not at fault. After all, the entire point of explicit consent is riding the coattails of 70's-80's feminism which paints male as sexual aggressor/damager and female as sexually passive/victim. In this model, which has informed politics, social behavior, AND law for the last 40 years, it is an unintended consequence that a woman would get subjected to it.

Think about how women are decrying women having to pay alimony. Their claims rest on the fact that the wording is too vague and all encompassing and unfairly hurts women. Or the way that women are decrying female prisons. Their beliefs that female prisons should close/are more damaging to women rest on the notion that 'prison is a system designed FOR MEN', as such to subject women to it is unfair and cruel.

The idea of explicit consent is to subject MEN to these rules, as such there would be plenty of argument that women should not be held to it's standard by the peanut gallery, and we'd see a LOT of spinning going on in court cases, picking apart every last detail to see if she can be found incompetent or not guilty.

For a man, its a simple open and shut case.

[–]JebberJabber -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago* (6 children) | Copy Link

There has been a lot of talk about affirmative consent and there is a constant rebirthing of the zombie lie that this requires verbal consent. It does not.

Universities have recommended verbal consent. I don't know, maybe there are universities which require it. But check carefully because most claims about mandatory verbal consent are zombie lies. Just because it is recommended on a poster, or stated as an instruction, does not mean it is university rule. If it is, that applies only on campus.

Candada has had affirmative consent for yonks, and the sky did not fall. California's colleges have it.

I have never heard of "enthusiastic consent" in a legal context.
It gets mentioned in informal recommendations on campus and in high school sex ed. Where I think it is a damn good idea, having read far too many accounts by girls who allowed themselves to be pressured into sex that absolutely was not rape, but they did not have the social skills to say no and they hated that it happened. Just because it was perfectly legal doesn't mean it was OK.

[–]mwobuddy 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

If the notion of explicit of 'enthusiastic' consent goes through legally, then if you make a move on a woman,

If the notion of explicit of 'enthusiastic' consent goes through legally, then if you make a move on a woman,

If the notion of explicit of 'enthusiastic' consent goes through legally, then if you make a move on a woman,

Thank you for not reading properly.

having read far too many accounts by girls who allowed themselves to be pressured into sex that absolutely was not rape, but they did not have the social skills to say no and they hated that it happened.

Boo hoo.

[–]JebberJabber 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

If the notion of explicit of 'enthusiastic' consent goes through legally

I read it fine, I said I'd never heard that phrase in a legal context and gave two examples of affirmative consent jurisdictions.

So, do you have an example? Is any state considering a bill regarding "enthusiastic consent"? Or verbal consent?

[–]mwobuddy 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

http://nypost.com/2017/02/11/why-college-guys-should-be-terrified-of-campus-hookups/

Read: LAW.

Go ahead and google people's attempts to make it valid everywhere in the state.

[–]JebberJabber 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

There is nothing about enthusiastic consent in that article, or the university rules, or the law, or any proposed law I have seen.

As for people's "attempts" to extend the Title IX campus rule into state law, they typically consist of one airhead talking to other airheads saying "something must be done!". They don't typically even get as far as working out who they would need to approach, and they sure as hell don't get as far as putting together a realistic proposal that a politician from a major party could put forward to be voted on. You will note that history does not contain any examples of defeated bills of this type despite calls for them from feminists since forever.

An internal university disciplinary hearing is somewhat comparable to court adjudication of a dispute in civil law, thus the "balance of probability" standard of evidence.

It is very different to criminal law. Sure, lots of air-headed femmies don't understand that so suggest it could be expanded to criminal law. Everybody who has a clue about criminal law recognises them as ignorant airheads and dismisses them.

Airheads have been saying the same shit about changing the standard of evidence in criminal rape trials since the 1960s but nobody who matters has even considered it let alone been swayed.
It would require dropping the presumption of innocence, which is a non-starter because it would up-end the entire criminal legal system, not just rape law. Ain't gonna happen.

[–]mwobuddy 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

enthusiastic consent

Try ctrl+F if you can't manage to read.

“Men need to feel a cold spike of fear when they begin a sexual encounter.” Those were not the words of a nun at your local Catholic high school 50 years ago. They were written in 2014 by the progressive Ezra Klein, editor of Vox, in explaining the importance of California’s “affirmative consent” law.

http://www.gender-focus.com/2012/11/09/weve-got-to-talk-about-enthusiastic-consent/

The idea of enthusiastic consent is quite simple. In a nutshell, it advocates for enthusiastic agreement to sexual activity, rather than passive agreement. Many of you may be familiar with the book Yes Means Yes!, which popularized the idea. The concept also requires that consent be given to each piece of sexual activity, meaning that a yes to one thing (such as vaginal penetration) does not mean consent to another (like anal penetration).

https://thinkprogress.org/what-affirmative-consent-actually-means-ea665b32b388

A proposed bill in California that would require college students to obtain explicit consent before proceeding with a sexual encounter is sparking controversy over whether that standard can actually work in practice. The legislation, which was introduced as a direct response to the current sexual assault crisis on college campuses, defines consent as an “affirmative, conscious, and voluntary agreement to engage in sexual activity” every step of the way. There are some concerns that’s much too broad.

enthusiastic consent is quite simple... The concept also requires that consent be given to each piece of sexual activity, meaning that a yes to one thing

proposed bill in California that would require college students to obtain explicit consent before proceeding with a sexual encounter... affirmative, conscious, and voluntary agreement to engage in sexual activity” every step of the way.

Do you fucking get it now? jesus christ..

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Some people do not look their age. This goes both ways. Some look younger, some look older. Add in clothing and makeup, and you can age yourself up and down.

I don't see how he "should have known". There is no age stamp on our forehead to lay the blame on anyone for "not knowing".

I had a friend in school and when she was 12 she developed, and she developed big. She could have trapped an adult in this scheme if she wanted.

[–]bufedad 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This was the consensus on the comments on Facebook. I'm not defending the guy he should have been able to tell, but are we really getting to the point I gotta card my dates? I got one tomorrow should I be asking for ID?

My daughter has a 12 year old friend (female... tall) who looks 18 without makeup.

Just because someone is 12, doesn't mean they look 12.

[–]JebberJabber -2 points-1 points0 points 9 years ago* (12 children) | Copy Link

If there is any chance she could be under age then yes you need proof, and asking for this without giving offense is a basic social skill for men who are likely to want sex with a young woman within a few years of the legal limit without getting involved enough to know their age by other means.

I don't know how you do it. A photo of their ID held up by their face?
A court would not be impressed by a claim that you sighted a driver licence which looked authentic, unless there was some other evidence that the fake license existed, e.g. she acknowledged your reference to it in a txt. Maybe say you had a friend who had a bad scare with an underage girl and ask her what ID she can bring.

If she doesn't trust you enough to reveal her legal name and date of birth, why would you trust her enough to have sex with?

It is common for under-age kids to lie about their age to get sex.

Twelve and 25? I didn't even read the article. Lock him up.

[–]mwobuddy 4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/M/MV5BMTk2MzM4OTE2N15BMl5BanBnXkFtZTgwMjIzMDAxODE@._V1_UX214_CR0,0,214,317_AL_.jpg

This is 13.

http://www.impawards.com/2012/posters/are_all_men_pedophiles_xlg.jpg

This is 14.

When I was 12, there was a girl in my class with double D tits already and wide hips.

It is well known that 'people are developing sooner' these days.

It is also well documented that single mother households cause females to mature sooner, imo probably because to signal a male mate for prehistoric danger/protection/mating reasons. Lower likelyhood of survival? Mature sooner to attract a mate, etc.

https://www.google.com/search?q=12+year+olds+who+look+18&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8

https://www.quora.com/I-am-a-22-year-old-woman-but-I-look-like-a-13-year-old-girl-I-feel-very-depressed-about-it-I-get-asked-which-grade-Im-in-and-get-carded-all-the-time-What-should-I-do-about-this

http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/YoungerThanTheyLook

http://www.iflscience.com/health-and-medicine/scientists-confirm-people-age-different-rates/

https://www.theguardian.com/science/2015/jul/06/old-before-your-time-people-age-at-wildly-different-rates-study-confirms

[–]Vandechoz 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

From your quora link, this is 24

[–]mwobuddy -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

https://youtu.be/aiaRiAui9wU?t=8

Yeah, she looks like a messed up 13-14 year old. I bet she's probably about 100 lb and 5.2 as well.

[–]JebberJabber 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

The question is not whether she looked 16 in a single still photograph. Did she sound 16? Was she small for 16 year old?
After she admitted being a liar, what evidence did he have that 16 was not another lie?
The standard is not being plausibly 16, it is being certainly 16. Very, very different.

He has responsibility for ensuring she was legal, bearing in mind that a child can not consent and their lies do not provide legal cover. There was only one adult in the room, and he was 25. This was not a romance which developed between two peers.

[–]geniice -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/M/MV5BMTk2MzM4OTE2N15BMl5BanBnXkFtZTgwMjIzMDAxODE@._V1_UX214_CR0,0,214,317_AL_.jpg

This is 13.

http://www.impawards.com/2012/posters/are_all_men_pedophiles_xlg.jpg

This is 14.

No those are heavily processed images.

[–]mwobuddy 6 points7 points8 points 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

yeah... that's totally why 14 year olds got into playboy spreads...

Listen, you may not think it be like it be but it do. People age at different rates, people will look different at the same age. People will also judge people to be similar aged, older, or younger based on their own internal age clock.Some 25 year olds will see 16 year olds as nearly equal to their own age, depending on all the factors. Some 25 year olds will be haggard themselves and will see 21 year olds as looking tiny and juvenile in appearance.

[–]JebberJabber 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I have a zip file of every Playboy centrefold. Few of them could even be 16, let alone 12. The youngest appear to be around 18 but most are 20-25 I guess.

All I found with Google was a case from 1978, a mother gave permission to for a shoot with her underage daughter which was published by Playboy, not in its magazine. Three years later the daughter tried to block further publication but was overruled.

[–]geniice -2 points-1 points0 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

yeah... that's totally why 14 year olds got into playboy spreads...

citation needed.

Listen, you may not think it be like it be but it do.

Are you suggesting I can't spot a heavily processed image?

[–]mwobuddy 5 points6 points7 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Im suggesting you don't realize that people can look far different in age.

[–]mwobuddy 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

https://youtu.be/pW_xdftOspA?t=104

How old is this woman, Carrie Fisher, in this scene? No cheating. Make an educated guess. This is a very 'unheavily unprecessed' image.

[–]PepperTe 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Being really talented with makeup and produce a lot of the same effect.

[–]macgarthur[S] 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

She said she was 18, then 16. Age of consent in Canada is 16 (was 14 before 2008) so he probably thought it was OK until the police showed up.

The "cash me outside" girl is 13 but I would have guessed 16.

[–]PepperTe 4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Doesn't matter. Possessing a fake id, even the best fake id in the world, does not allow a child to consent. We have a law that only cares about age, so no action on the girl's part (other than waiting til she is of age) could ever result in her consent. The law needs to be fixed.

[–]Ted8367 15 points16 points17 points 9 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

So, she actively misrepresented her age, then went to the police. Sounds like entrapment to me.

Maybe this problem needs another approach. She should be on a list, well publicized with illustrations, addresses and so forth. Not a "sex offenders" list, no, no, perish the thought! A list of ages.

[–]geniice -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

So, she actively misrepresented her age, then went to the police. Sounds like entrapment to me.

She isn't a law enforcement agency so there is no way that entrapment could apply.

Maybe this problem needs another approach. She should be on a list, well publicized with illustrations, addresses and so forth.

Dude she's 12.

[–]Mashiki 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Let me just say that this case nearly happened in my backyard(as in I live within 100km which is close in Canada).

She isn't a law enforcement agency so there is no way that entrapment could apply.

True. There are other charges that apply to this in her case. Depending on how it goes in court, they could also hit her with perjury and misleading justice.

Dude she's 12.

In Canada, mens rea kicks in at 12. In other words, under the eyes of the law she knew what she was doing. Canada also has the "young offenders act" which means there will be a publication ban on the entire thing. On top of that your criminal record becomes sealed at 18 unless you commit a serious offence. What will likely happen is the guy will get a suspended sentence after it comes out in court that she lured him. I also wouldn't be surprised if there are more people involved in this, and she was doing this at the behest of a friend to get the man was was charged into trouble with the law. He can also argue the "reasonable age" exception, since she claimed she was 16. The AoC in Canada is 16.

[–]Ted8367 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

She isn't a law enforcement agency so there is no way that entrapment could apply.

" a 25-year-old man was arrested Thursday and charged with sexual assault and luring a child."

Arrested and charged. Sounds like a law enforcement agency to me.

Dude she's 12.

Exactly.

[–]geniice -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

" a 25-year-old man was arrested Thursday and charged with sexual assault and luring a child."

Arrested and charged. Sounds like a law enforcement agency to me.

Entrapment requires a law enforcement agency do whatever it is. Not some random 12 year old kid (its also a lot narrower than most people seem to think but that's a secondary issue).

Exactly.

You want to violate the privacy of 12 year old sexual assault victims because they are 12? I mean that is literally the only way your comments could be coherent.

[–]Ted8367 -4 points-3 points-2 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Entrapment requires a law enforcement agency

And, Presto! there was one.

Not some random 12 year old kid

A 12 year old kid was indeed involved. Refer to the article posted by the OP.

You want to violate the privacy of 12 year old sexual assault victims because they are 12?

Small communities, where everybody knows everybody else, are not particularly known for being hotbeds of sexual crime, though no-one has "privacy" in the sense that everybody knows where you live, what you look like, and what age you are. It seems to me that the enabler in this case was the "privacy" - more accurately, anonymity - afforded by the website.

[–]geniice 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

So you've opted for the incoherent route. Fair enough

[–]btmims 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

For entrapment to apply, it would have to be a 12-year-old cop, or the girl would have to have been acting under the directions of the police. And even then, there are other rules regarding entrapment I don't remember atm, that's why police can make drug/prostitution stings.

Maybe some kind of "fraudulent misrepresentation" applies.

[–]Ted8367 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

There's a legal definition of "entrapment" for law enforcement which, as you say, doesn't apply here because the 12 year old girl is not law enforcement. However, in a more general sense, "entrapment" is what happens when you - or anyone - sets a trap and the victim falls into it. That's any sort of trap and it does apply here. In this more general sense, the 12 year old girl baited the trap by offering herself, as bait, under false pretenses, then the victim follows the bait and discovers the sharp end of it. That is how traps work. Although the sharp end in this case was supplied by law enforcement, it need not be that way.

For example, a couple of years back, in Pitsea in the UK, there was a similar case which resulted in a murder where the sharp end was supplied by a gang of teenagers. Law enforcement was involved, but only in investigating the murder.

[–]JebberJabber 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

The more likely sequence is that she talked about it with her parents or with someone else, and ended up going to the police. That's what I would advise a 12 year old to do, regardless of whether she set up and drove the whole event. Unless she really did come across as clearly over 16 with the maturity to go with it. I know two girls who would meet the visual part of that if they were into makeup. But only the visual part, and only at first glance. A 25 year old would know they were not old enough to be doing casual sex stuff with a guy of his age they had just met.

[–]Ted8367 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The more likely sequence

Except, you don't know. And, legally, you can't find out. Then follows a lot of guesswork about ages, puberty, makeup, photoshopping, what he might have thought, what she might have thought, and so on. It's a lot of squirming around, and why do you think that is?

If you are really interested in stopping this stuff, then I suggest those arrangements are unsatisfactory. Then we have to ask: can things be done better?

It seems to me to come down to knowing the age. If the age is known, then most of these problems go away.

How can the age be known unambiguously? I've suggested a well publicized, public, list, with ages, addresses and pictures. The "privacy" objection, when you think about it, is vacuous. Everyone who knows you, knows roughly how old you are; what is the objection to knowing it exactly? Similarly, people living near you already know where you live and what you look like.

A better objection is that the list would enable stalking. To counter that, access to the list could not be anonymous. Anyone "sniffing around" would be visible.

I've not given it much thought; the suggestion just came up, mostly fueled by anger. Other suggestions are welcome.

[–]omegaphallic 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Actually under Canadian law SHE is guilty of sexual assault, because under Canadian Sexual assault laws, it includes fraud, which she committed.

In practice it has to be serious fraud, like lying about ones HIV status to have unprotected sex, but this guy could go to jail so this qualifies in IMHO.

I hope she gets charged.

[–]JebberJabber 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Can you charge a 12 year old?

[–]macgarthur[S] 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I believe they can under the young offenders act since this is fairly serious.

[–]omegaphallic 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yes, she is just old enough I believe to be considered aware enough, but she would be sentanced as a juvinile.

[–]oliefan37 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

We should run a PSA. 18-21 age claim should be a 100% ID check.

[–]tio1w 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

A 12 year old that passes as an 18 year old?!

[–]Ted8367 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

"the girl claimed to be 18 years old when she first started talking to the man, then lowered her supposed age to 16."

[–]macgarthur[S] 8 points9 points10 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Ontario Canada age of consent is 16 so he probably thought he was OK until finding out she was actually 12 when the police showed up.

[–]PepperTe 4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

Not too uncommon. Especially given that there are 18 year olds who look younger.

One thing to remember is that you'll never see it because if you see a 12 year old who looks 18, you'll just label them as 18 and never know better. And if you see an 18 year old who looks 12, you'll just label them as 12 and never know better. Unless you have a reason to really know their ages, you would never know better.

[–]tio1w -2 points-1 points0 points 9 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

14 year old girls looking 18 is common, but 12 is either not pubescent or just reached puberty recently.

[–]PepperTe 5 points6 points7 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Girls can start puberty at 8 or even earlier. Not everyone follows the average trend.

[–]tio1w 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Anything under 9 is really uncommon.

[–]PepperTe 6 points7 points8 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Uncommon doesn't mean impossible.

This would be like commenting on every story about a lottery winner that it has to be fake because winning the lottery is extremely rare.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

As I mentioned in another comment, I had a girl friend who hit puberty at 12. Over the summer she went from being a kid, to being taller than nearly every boy [until they hit puberty, myself included~ but she was still tall by female standards] and had big breasts.

And she looked more mature than most girls in our school, even ones older than her. Add in makeup and different clothes, and you can easily pass for 18.

We like to believe there's some obvious indication that an underage person is underage... but as soon as puberty hits, that's no longer true at all.

Meanwhile, my sister passed for 16 as a 23 year old... mother. So... yeah. Age is pretty fucking arbitrary. There is no obvious "they are definitely x". Other than prepubescent children. Even then, you can't guess their exact age all the time. But you know they've yet to hit puberty. But after that... throws up arms

edit; The guy was dumb to still do things with her after he found out she lied once though. And for thinking he could even be sexual with a 16 year old without consequences. Wrong. Soon as she claimed to be 16, he should have booted her out. Even if that was true.

[–]MRA-automatron-2kb 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Ontario Canada age of consent is 16

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

And? Age of consent rarely matters.

Especially in the US.

[–]mwobuddy 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

http://www.omaha.com/news/crime/omaha-teacher-who-had-sex-with--year-old-pleads/article_5009cc9a-d097-5a26-9add-6bad42de5cc1.html

[–]TibsKirk 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I find it pretty difficult to believe that a 12 year old could pass as 18, but I'm sure that there are examples out there. I feel like any guy who hooks up with a girl claiming to be 22 asks to see an ID or determines age due to other factors.

At this point, I don't blame men for carding a 28 year old woman. He has so much to lose for not being careful. I still get carded for alcohol, and I am way beyond 28.

[–]Lethn 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

This what gets me about this, seems like a suspicious situation to me, at the very least like you say, he should have asked for ID if there was something really off and her stupid parents have a lot to answer for as well. I get that it was really sneaky and manipulative, but if you're an adult you should know better in this situation, don't take any chances.

[–]macgarthur[S] 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

She originally said she was 18 then later changed it to 16. I could see a 12 year old pass for 16 especially because that's the age of consent.

[–]Regnes 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Both at fault in this case. She mislead him at first, but he should have known she wasn't 18.

12? Come on man.

[–]-redditardation- 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Dating sites need to properly vet age.

If they list age they need to confirm it or they need to highlight specifically that the age has been confirmed or is not yet confirmed.

[–]JebberJabber 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Would punters give their true identity to a dating site? That is a lot of trust, considering how much some people want to get their hands on people's real names, addresses, car description and plate number, and exact date of birth.

[–]-redditardation- 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That is definitely an issue that is why I provided the opportunity to mark profiles as unverified.

I think ideally there would be a way to use a separate entity to verify this. Something like an online ID host where you get an ID and the data is stored and then you would give this ID to the dating site which would cross verify without actually knowing who you are.

[–]babno 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

If she were 15+ then sure, it's reasonable to believe they are 18. But 12? No. Especially after she already admitted she lied (she changed 18 to 16).

[–]bufedad 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I personally know a 12 year old girl that passes for 18, without makeup or anything special. She just looks a little flat chested for an 18 year old. Add in the right makeup and she could pass for 21 easily.

It's not unheard of.

[–]damac_phone 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

He touched a twelve year old. They talked online and she said she was 18, but then they met in person and he still touched her. If he's that dumb I don't have much sympathy for him.

Would like to see some sort of addition brought to the criminal code for underagers misrepresenting themselves though.

[–]dejour 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

He should be treated somewhat more leniently than someone who knew that the kid was 12. But really this doesn't seem like an honest mistake. He had a duty to verify her age.

[–]bufedad 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

He had a duty to verify her age.

He could have asked for an id, and she provided a fake one.

He could have asked to see her birth certificate and she provided a fake one.

He could have asked to see a notarized judges statement about her age, and she provided a real one.

If he did all of that, and she did all of that... he would still be guilty.

[–]PepperTe 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

He is at fault. She is unable to consent no matter what she does. Even if she makes up the most convincing lie with all the best evidence in the world, she is still 12 and thus her actions can NEVER count as consent. As such, assuming the man did actually touch her in a sexual way (something that will still need to be proven in court), it was done non-consensual and he is guilty of child molestation.

The only way to arrive at a different conclusion is to assume the sexual actions count as consensual because of the actions the girl took leading to their meeting up (lying about her age, unauthorized use of a computer network, etc.). But that means that a 12 year old could take a course of actions that allows them to consent, which is to say that a 12 year old can give consent (even if they have more hoops to jump through).

Either 12 year olds can give consent or they can't, and if they can't, it doesn't matter what the 12 year old does, the guilty is a child molester.

And this is why using age to determine consent is stupid, we should use mental maturity, and anyone who lies this much to get into a sexual situation is mentally mature enough to give consent.

[–]Mashiki 5 points6 points7 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

He is at fault. She is unable to consent no matter what she does.

She can consent at 12 with another 12yr old, or 13. Maybe 14 depending on how the law swings on the various subsections. But not with a 15 or 16yr old. The AoC is 16 in Canada. But Mens Rea(the mental element of a criminal act) applies when you turn 12 as well. Which means she under the law knows what she's doing is right or wrong. Which also means she knowingly engaged in behavior which was illegal in order to cause injury to another party.

There's also the "assumption under age" where she stated that she was 16. The entire thing reeks from the top down though and I won't be surprised if there is far more to this entire thing. The police though don't have any way out on this, they have to charge him under the law. And with the YCJA here, we'll likely never hear another story on it because they can slap a publication ban on it.

[–]mwobuddy 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The blanket hand wave statement is that regardless of her actions, she is actually a complete victim of herself and the other person involved. If it'd been 12 and 15, there might be a case because of nearness in age, but since one is an actual legal adult, all the blame is shifted to this individual.

[–]kutuup1989 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Was it not obvious by looking at her that she was 12?

[–]abattlescar 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

First off, that guy has something wrong for not being able to tell she's 12. Second off, I think she should get larseny charges or something.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter