~ archived since 2018 ~
Popular
Other
skon7
[–]2_cider_jack 34 points35 points36 points 3 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link
Based. This is a big step in preventing the fascistic, misogynistic ideology of the red pill from spreading.
[–]BornagainHOBOZEXUAL1 points 3 years ago [recovered] (2 children) | Copy Link
“BaSeD” 😂😂😂😂🤡
[–]AutoModerator[M] 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Please note that this account is new and may not yet be a trusted commenter for this sub.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
[–]Unusual_Singer8798 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Its based
[–]StannGrozev -15 points-14 points-13 points 3 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link
He is not misogynist and many women proved it.
[–]Yonroe 27 points28 points29 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Andrew taint isn’t gonna suck your dick homie chill out
[–]Icy_Professional3138 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
If you broke clowning a millionare, you the real clown
[–]Tostitos153 10 points11 points12 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
He literally says women are his property. How is he no misogynistic?
[–]BornagainHOBOZEXUAL1 points 3 years ago [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link
When a father gives his daughter away at the wedding, at the alter in a sense .. he was responsible for her . Now her husband will be. Its not like shes a piece of furniture, yall so fukn dumb and close minded.
[–]2_cider_jack 8 points9 points10 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
he absolutely, positively, is a misogynist lmao
Please note that this account has negative karma and may not yet be a trusted commenter for this sub.
[–]spiraldinosaur 69 points70 points71 points 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Wonderful. May he be the first of many other pieces of shit like him.
[–]AssignmentWest7267 10 points11 points12 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
🎉🎊👏🏻🥳
[+]Gino195 -10 points-9 points-8 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
🤖🤖🤖
[–]spiraldinosaur 6 points7 points8 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Are you trying to suggest I'm a bot? With 45k karma?
[–]2020mademejoinreddit 21 points22 points23 points 3 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link
Now, all we have to do is collectively stop talking about him and others like him and ignore them. Stop giving them fame. On which they capitalize. Since that's how they get so famous. Manipulating SEO results.
He technically didn't have his own youtube channels BTW, he was having others post his videos. What we need is have those channels that even mention his name, either be given a strike or demonetized or outright video deleted. That's how you wipe him out.
Once again, for reference, this is how he does it. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6LwdbVHBTFc (That's not my video just fyi).
Him and others like him do this, including Elon Musk. They use their mentions as a climb to fame and fortune. Do not mention them by name at least. Don't contribute to their fame.
[–]skon7[S] 11 points12 points13 points 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
I agree. He is currently rumored to be paying ppl to post his content for affiliate commission
[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
I'm pretty sure how RSD used to do it too. Same content, different face. Makes sense they would cycle methods for the same garbage content.
[–]Drwfyytrre 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Rsd?
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
This is just a small pebble of an entire iceburg, but here: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/jan/22/jeff-allen-and-other-pickup-artists-advocate-its-right-he-had-his-visa-cancelled
[–]Particular_Fall_9708 -1 points0 points1 point 3 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
Right… and forget that free speech even exists.
[–]2020mademejoinreddit 3 points4 points5 points 3 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
Your freedom ends where mine begins. If your "free speech" and "freedom" is invading my safety or the safety of others, then you don't have your freedom anymore and you're a criminal to be imprisoned.
This guy and ones like him are harming young men more than "helping" them and that makes them someone who invades someone else's freedom of thought. That's where their freedom of speech ends.
[–]Particular_Fall_9708 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
I’m not looking to get into an argument so this will probably be my only reply to you. I will still read what you have to say back. Championing for young men is not harmful. Promoting traditional marital relationships is not harmful. Standing up against things like covid, vaccines, etc is not harmful. Although he has made some distasteful comments, I have the ability to ‘eat the meat and spit out the bones.’ What I mean by that is I take the information from him that is extremely helpful and avoid the controversial.
What is harmful is our society allowing our role models to be the likes of Chris Brown, a woman beater; Future, an drug promoter; and the chief medical advisor Anthony Fouci who’s policies and recommendations have literally destroyed our society. People like these are 100x more harmful to our society than someone standing up for the invisible young men of our society. But anyone that thinks outside of the box and upholds any kind of Christian values gets their character assassinated and is ostracized.
I look forward to hearing what you have to say back to me, but this is a far as I am taking this conversation because I do not want to allow this to consume anymore of my time. I wish you the best.
[–]2020mademejoinreddit 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link
Believe me, when I say this, that most of what you wrote, I fully agree with. Especially about certain individuals mentioned that would get both of us banned a few months ago. I do wish that those individuals would've been banned as well. Maybe our world wouldn't be in such chaos now. Many are still unwilling to even acknowledge that those things and lock downs were harmful and they will throw a tantrum if you mention it. Don't even get me started on the V-word. Despite me having taken it, I still never supported the forcing of others to do it (mostly for profit, let's face it, especially considering the peer reviewed studies that are coming out now).
And Chris Brown is and always was an abusive asswipe. I can't believe someone like that is even allowed to roam free. Societal hypocrisy at its finest.
Believe me, I despise censorship in general. And despite not being religious, I do prefer old school Christian values. But like I said, your freedom ends, where mine begins. I firmly believe that.
HOWEVER, one thing I do disagree on is that, this one particular guy and F&F are NOT someone who are standing up for invisible men. Far from it. They are exploiting them or at the very least, making tons of money off of someone's desperation and loneliness. They claim to be "red pilled" but they are not. At least not what RP used to mean once upon a time during the 90's and early 2000's.
His comments were far from "distasteful". "Distasteful" is commenting about a body in a typical douchey way. But what he has said is borderline and often crossing the line of HATING women in general. Not to mention promoting hypocrisy by basically telling young guys to treat women as trash and to cheat on them. CHEAT? That is not something that I can abide by.
He and those other douchebags have no character to begin with. I believe that no human should be treated as 'less than' you. I believe that one should not cheat in a relationship. I believe that one should not exploit someone who is in a vulnerable position. All of which the above mentioned have done time and time again.
He isn't just controversial, what you wrote in your second paragraph and what I wrote in my first, are controversial things. What he says is outright rage-bait. A hate-filled message that spreads faster than any actual disease. I don't want young men to be infected with that hate. Especially with mental health problems being the rapidly growing concern today, considering people were imprisoned in their homes for almost over a year. Many young men are vulnerable now more than ever. And he and many like him are exploiting that for their own selfish monetary gains.
If it were up to me, I'd remove all of the above mentioned. ALL of them, the corruption that they are, from our society, and make it a better place for everyone, especially for the younger generation, to live in.
You're gonna get me in trouble by making me admit what I did above. But I guess it had to be done. To make my stance clear.
Feel free not to respond, but I do hope you read this. Have a Good day.
[–]Particular_Fall_9708 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
I was under the assumption that this conversation would go south. Since it didn’t, I wish to reply. I respect your opinions. Quite honestly, I’ve never looked at it as exploiting young men. I find that interesting because I know that nobody else is like me and everybody takes ideas and messages differently. So I can see your side of the argument. I still don’t think he should’ve been banned, but I truly understand your viewpoint.
[–]2020mademejoinreddit 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Logic is a rare breed nowadays, so I can understand your concern.
I'm sorry that we can't agree on this one thing.
However, we don't have to. Different people. Different lives. Different experiences. Different thoughts and opinions. That is all.
I do think he should be banned, along with other major criminals who rot our society. Because if you extend the freedom to him, aren't you, by default extending the same freedom to the real tyrants out there? The ones whose names we do not speak. I cannot abide by that.
That is all. However, I can see your point as well.
Good day and thanks for keeping it civil, logical and rational. Rare thing, especially on this platform here when it comes to these kinds of topics. Glad to see not everyone has a knee-jerk reaction.
[–]doneshitmypantsagain 53 points54 points55 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Oh thank Christ I am so sick of this C**t
[–]skon7[S] 41 points42 points43 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
https://www.dexerto.com/entertainment/youtube-removes-andrew-tate-channels-tatespeech-tateconfidential-1911208/
He also got removed from twitch now too.
[–]RealRussShackleford 7 points8 points9 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
I’m not even engaging the freedom of speech aspect since it’s been addressed already, but I’m happy and would still be happy regardless of his messaging.
Any douchebag that’s paying people to re-upload their content with affiliate links is the modern day version of the old robocaller scam and deserves a throat punch followed by a stiff kick in the nuts.
[–]GrayMouser12 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
That's kinda my take. I mean I also think the dude is human scum and just one more person I have to potentially waste time on explaining to my boys why a 40+ year old whose never had a long fulfilling relationship based on mutual respect is probably not going to be your ideal life coach but that's easy enough since he's an anthropomorphic MLM.
The real thing why my usually lenient attitude against censorship is triggering off is because the guy spent a bunch of money to game the algorithm so much so that I now have neuropathways I can't unprogram in the short term dedicated to his image which I obviously never consented to.
Easily ignored toxic drivel is one thing but essentially becoming YouTube bloatware pre installed on near every feed should be cut at the knees. The last thing we need is more wealthy scam artists dumping money into making our browsing experience monetized specifically for their gain even more than it already is.
This goes for any of those guys face rolling misogyny for massive clicks. Ugh. They should all go join Truth Social so they can truly run free on a platform designed specifically for their branding.
[–]summakamlaude21 4 points5 points6 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
“Anthropomorphic MLM” is freakin’ hilarious😂😂😂
[–]JUST_WANTTOBEHAPPY 17 points18 points19 points 3 years ago (20 children) | Copy Link
Nothing gonna change, give it few more months another weird redpill guy will pop up.
As long as the discourse of gender war keep going men will feel they are not being understood
[–]skon7[S] 9 points10 points11 points 3 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
I agree that men clearly want and need a voice and are feeling misunderstood. How so we address that without vilifying or putting down women also?
[–]JUST_WANTTOBEHAPPY 7 points8 points9 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
I think you misunderstood my point, or maybe I conveyed it poorly.
There need to be more dialogue of challenging definition of masculinity and addressing men loneliness in a way that doesn't put down woman. A good example is contrapoint video addressing men, in a critical lens without dismissing their problem.
And if the narrative of woman are suppressing masculinity or woman are evil keep perpetuated. Silencing this redpill people alone isn't an effective strategy
[–]skon7[S] 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
No I knew what you meant even if it didn’t seem like I did and I agree
[–]MentalAlternative8 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Sorry, I didn't realise this was your perspective. I thought you wanted to stop talking entirely about gender related issues. If this is your perspective I commend you.
[–]MentalAlternative8 9 points10 points11 points 3 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link
Maybe those insecure man babies that get triggered over women demanding equal rights should grow the hell up and focus on the actual issues at hand, which to be clear have nothing to do with feminism. Well, actually that's not quite true. Most feminists advocate for men's rights as well, eg the fact that men are socialised under the patriarchy to conform to silly masculine ideas like "men don't cry, you're weak to talk about your feelings, push it down and be strong" and many many other things similar to that.
The reason so many men off themselves is due largely to societies' unrealistic and sexist (yes, towards men, but via oppression by other men).
The "gender war" is perpetuated by shitty people like Ben Shapiro and Tate, that advocate for the aforementioned bullshit and call anyone who disagrees triggered libtards. Actual constructive conversations are happening, and we should keep talking about gender issues. So I'm not sure I get your point.
[–]kalu777 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Men go thru so many issues yet they only one feminist care to mention and bring up is the “men don’t cry…thus they kill themselves”. I wonder why.
[–]MentalAlternative8 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
That's the only issue affecting men that feminists bring up? Something tells me you've never had a conversation with a feminist in real life, or potentially any good faith discussion with a feminist via any medium.
I responded to someone else that commented on the comment of mine you responded to, detailing the various ways feminists fight for issues affecting men. If you wanna maybe look at that and then have a good faith discussion, that'd be swell. Otherwise, strawman and misrepresent away, can't say I'll lose sleep over it.
[–]kalu777 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Read ur comment again brother…the only “issue” u mentioned feminists fight against is men not being able to be vulnerable…Again I wonder why thats the case. Why is that the first thing u guys always seem to bring up. You said patriarchy set unrealistic standards for both genders but only mentioned men not being able to cry
93% workplace death are men
1 in 6 men sexually abused/ assulted
1 in 4 experienced rape, physical violense and/or stalking from an ex Yet in the entire USA there are only 2 shelters for male victims, while 2000+ for women
Men receive 63% more prison time than their female counterparts
Only 1 in 6 custodial parents are men More than 1 in 4 with children below 18 live apart from their children
13.4% of all men have served the military while only 1.6% of women and men make 99.9% of all deaths there
Every 18 man is required by law to sign for the draft if u dont a 250k fine and/ or imprisonment is waiting for u. Women are exempt
30% of people that fought in vietnam were drafted
And to finish it off about 45-47% of domestic violence encouters are initiated by women. (Amber Heard cough cough)
All this things men go thru and the fact u cant cry is the only thing u mention. And u are a feminist?
[–]tms79 -1 points0 points1 point 3 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
Where the heck is feminism advocating for men's rights or issues? Receipts please.
[–]MentalAlternative8 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Okay. Feminism, on principle and in practice, fights against the patriarchy. The patriarchy sets unfair and unrealistic standards for all genders, including men. For example, the standard that men should be strong and keep their feelings bottled up, because it's weak/girly to talk about your feelings, is a presumably centuries old patriarchal standard. It's also partially why men off themselves at way higher rates than women do.
This is upheld in part by all of the moronic redpillers that say "don't talk about your feelings, it'll show women that you're weak and they'll leave you for a manlier man", as well as society in general. This is getting better, partially as a result of society realising that this isn't a realistic standard and that it hurts both men and women. Who's been advocating for men being able to talk about their feelings, and the general dismantling of unfair gender roles? Wouldn't you know it, feminists and feminism. Men commit suicide at markedly higher rates
I remember when I was like 16 and I thought that feminism was bad and against men. Good times. Stop listening to people like Ben Shapiro and Jordan Peterson, it's rotting your brain mate.
[–]tms79 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
There are studies out there, that show, that if the man is too emotional in a relationship, the female loses all the attraction for him and the relationship goes usually south. In average. I agree, that to a certain extent, that men should show their emotions, but not on a basis a female does. Men and women process emotions differently, because we are inherently different. It's not only the studies, that show this, i can also speak from my experience. An ex girlfriend lost all the attraction in the past for me, because i was not the "stable rock" in the relationship, plus i was also to emotional. All what your are saying looks politically correct on paper, but it does not apply to reality. Instead of talking about feelings, i was hoping you would actually point out some of the real issues, that men since decades are struggling with. Like the 70-80% homeless people, that are men. Like the unfair family court system, that heavily favors the females and cripple most men emotionally, financially and mentally, which leads more often to suicide. Yes, in many countries the ratio for suicides is 4:1. And to my understanding, the main reason for this is because men still have in this day and age the burden of performance. Women in this age are still not willing to date or settle down, plenty of studies backing this up as well. I would even argue, that feminism is the opposite, and harms men since decades. We had in the USA after WW2 60% males and 40% females in colleges and feminism was pushing very hard, to get those numbers corrected. Fast forward to 2022 we have the now the exact same numbers but the gender is flipped. Do you see any outcry from feminism, that is supposedly also fighting for men's issues regarding those numbers in college? If you wanna look up, how equal feminism for example in australia is, i advise you to look up an article from Bettina Arndt regarding the australian public service. There you will see the true face of feminism. I don't wanna grow up right now as a young boy in australia.
[–]MentalAlternative8 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Care to cite the studies that you claim show that women will leave a man if they are "too emotional"? Whatever "too emotional" means.
You have a single instance of someone leaving you because you weren't a stoic manly man. How does that go against the countless women that are in healthy relationships with men who are able to effectively talk about emotions? I could say I am an emotional and expressive guy, and that my partner appreciates this and that it aids our relationship. How do these anecdotes have anything to do with feminism and patriarchy?
You mentioned the male suicide issue, and rightly point out that this is at least partially as a result of men having the burden of needing to live up to the societal image of the strong, financially stable provider. Do you think feminism came up with these standards? Because said standards have existed long, long before women even had the right to vote, when men had overwhelming power over women. As I explained, that is an issue related to long standing patriarchal gender roles.
You said that "women are not willing to date or settle down in this day and age". Maybe they're not willing to date or settle down with you, which makes sense given the bizzare incel worldview you seem to have. Plenty of women however are in monogamous relationships. Lots and lots. Plenty of women don't want to settle down at whatever point of their lives they're in. That's fine. People can do what they want. How is that an issue? Women don't want to fuck you, and that's somehow a problem feminism should tackle? Maybe look inwards instead of blaming women/feminism for your own lack of desirability.
I did point out actual issues that men are dealing with, and the patriarchal forces that enable these issues. You've gish galloped so many half truths and presented misinterpreted/false statistics that you haven't backed up, to the point that I'd be spending way more time than I have arguing against things that you'll never address.
To write off everything I said as "that's just talking about feelings" is reductive and suggests that you didn't actually compute anything I said. Why are you on an ex redpill subreddit when you're evidently redpilled? Spoken like an incel who is so deep in redpill ideology that you're performing Olympics level mental gymnastics to blame women for essentially not wanting to have sex with you, among other things with clear patriarchal origins. Hit up a therapist my g, life isn't going to be very pleasant for you if you keep up that mentality. Quit whining in your anti feminist echo chambers and actually talk to (not at) women about this stuff. What a miserable existence.
[–]tms79 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link
Don't do the the mistake, and just label me as an incel. I would rate myself as average, maybe slightly above and i am 6 feet tall. i just excluded myself from the dating game since a long time. You want my sources? Here you go:
Regarding women dating/marrying up:
https://ifstudies.org/blog/better-educated-women-still-prefer-higher-earning-husbandsRegarding women dont like sensitive men: (i had a better study for this, but i cant find it)
https://www.israel21c.org/women-really-dont-like-sensitive-men-study-finds/
Destruction of the family unit (where feminism plays a big role) and its consequenses (children are in a big disadvantage being in a single household):https://thefatherlessgeneration.wordpress.com/statistics/
Dr. Warren Farrel has a great book about those young boys, that are currently failing in all areas (The boy crysis)
I forgot to mention a big heated topic. DV in relationships: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12119-013-9194-1
Big meta study, that includes 270 empiric studies with almost half a million people, that shows women are equally or more physically violent in relationships with the opposite sex. I think Feminism spins here also a complete different narrative since decades. But yeah, its all conspiracy theory =) I advise the great professor Donald Dutton with his 45 years experience in the field of DV, who has a great 10 minute talk on YT regarding this topic (video is black and white)
[–]BornagainHOBOZEXUAL1 points 3 years ago [recovered] (4 children) | Copy Link
😂😂😂😂 women dont like feminine men like yourself buddy
[–]MentalAlternative8 4 points5 points6 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
My girlfriend would probably disagree with that statement. The fact that masses of "feminine" men like myself are in relationships, while whiny incels like yourself screech about how women are whores on the internet, certainly calls your worldview into question.
In the past hour you have left TWENTY FOUR comments that are essentially variations of "feminism has turned women into whores", "women don't like feminine men", and the clown emoji. Tired, repetitive talking points, zero good faith discussion. What exactly do you get out of that?
I'm guessing if you had any interactions with women outside of screeching at them on the internet for being whores or whatever, we might not be having this conversation. Good luck with that, you sound like a super happy and mentally stable individual.
[–]MemeGoddessAsteria 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
we do actually :)
[–]AutoModerator[M] 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]No-Recording-8670 12 points13 points14 points 3 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link
Why isn’t this happening to Myron?!??
[–]skon7[S] 13 points14 points15 points 3 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link
It will eventually.
He already was banned off Tik tok.
Tate had a bigger reach.
Just my observation but it appears white peoples claims are taken a bit more seriously than POC. Kevin samuels was never cancelled or banned for saying similar things.
I’m also white so I’m not playing a race card for those who might say that
[–]No-Recording-8670 5 points6 points7 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Yeah. Because if a white girl said what happened to me, happened to her. With him, he’d be more than gone. The irony. He doesn’t even like black women lol. I guess that’s why, they speak up. They’re too “loud”
[–]skon7[S] 7 points8 points9 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I think Kevin samuels did try to come for white women too and women as a whole but his audience was predominantly black so most of his content hurt black women way more than white women.
[–]HNIC2 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
KS was taken out completely
[–]skon7[S] 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
So you think it was foul play?
Hes half black😂😂😂
[–]skon7[S] 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
He isn’t visibly black which makes a huge difference in many ppls eyes
Go suck your mom
[–]The-Guy-In-Grey 25 points26 points27 points 3 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link
I said his day of reckoning was coming and guys this is only the beginning. Just wait.
[–]cashcapone96 4 points5 points6 points 3 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link
What do you mean by that? He gonna commit suicide by 24 bullet wounds in the back?
[–]skon7[S] 4 points5 points6 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Yeah, like this is as bad as it gets. What could be worst? Lol
[–]ResponsibleAd2541 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Hilldog on the case. 😂
[–]The-Guy-In-Grey -1 points0 points1 point 3 years ago* (6 children) | Copy Link
Can't say much more but lets say we have him and Tristan dead to rights. Hahaha I just hope it's not repeat of last time
[–]cashcapone96 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
What happened “last time”? 🤨 you mean Kevin Samuels?
[–]The-Guy-In-Grey 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago* (4 children) | Copy Link
That's one name I hope doesn't come up. But what I'm talking about is still under review and can't be discussed
[–]serd12 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
True cuz you're our employer right
[–]The-Guy-In-Grey 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Yep
He aint going anywhere 😂😂😂😂🤡
[–]JonF1 16 points17 points18 points 3 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link
Does this mean that videos featuring any or a lot of his youtube content is going to get contentid stricken?
[–]globalholiday50901 points 3 years ago [recovered] (9 children) | Copy Link
hope so
[–]JonF1 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link
This could mean that a lot if not most critical videos go down.
[–]globalholiday509010 points 3 years ago [recovered] (7 children) | Copy Link
meh. they can always edit out the misogyny and reupload.
[–]Yalahabibi6969 7 points8 points9 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Edit it then post it as “Sigma male” honestly sigma male videos are cringy AF and the worst part most guys actually believe in sigma males like they do with alpha males I always thought they were joking wtfff
[–]Drwfyytrre 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Applying yourself with any singular label, especially ones like these, is ironically the weakest thing at all. Why can’t people just be confident and uplifting while not believing the male version of astrology?
[–]ResponsibleAd2541 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
No, a proper critique should feature the person’s statements you are critiquing in context. Otherwise you are opening up the door to being dismissed for taking things out of context, this or that.
[–]JonF1 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
A lot of people scrap their premier or davcinvi projects a few weeks after they are done editing them because they take up a lot of space.
[–]globalholiday50901 points 3 years ago [recovered] (2 children) | Copy Link
shoulda thought of that before misogyny i guess maybe if they know its coming they can redownload their own vids or something otherwise guess u just gotta remake it 🤷♀️
[–]JonF1 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Huh?
I'm not talking about reuploaders. You can get a contentid trike for even just having a few seconds of someone else's video in yours.
[–]globalholiday50901 point 3 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
well thats what u get for spreading misogyny then i guess idk what else to say. hopefully theyll be reasonable with what vids they take down also its common to get warnings first and also be able to dispute videos so ya
[–]mynameisburner 6 points7 points8 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Off topic, but I am pretty sure I have seen this username before. I have you were on that Fresh&Fit Subreddit
[–]skon7[S] 3 points4 points5 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Yes
[–]mynameisburner 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Found out they got banned. Sorry.
Ps Chris is a bum
[–]PapaSanjay 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link
Bruv this will do nothing. He doesn’t post his clips
[–]skon7[S] 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
They will take that down also eventually but it just signifies the consequence of saying those things. Now ppl will think before they say things like that cause they could lose their online presence and whatever income they make from that
[–]PapaSanjay 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Waiting to see if that is going to happen
Feminine men like you are the problem
I’m a female loser
[–]kalu777 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Silencing Andrew Tate ain’t gonna do much. Give it 1-2 years and a even worse mysoginist is gonna come along. Jordan Peterson seems like a saint compared to Tate and he was shut down…then Tate…banning is like taking pain killers for a open wound
Why did they ban Peterson?
[–]J-in-the-UK 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link
Glad they have removed him; but why were they promoting him so much before?
I like to scroll youtube; the ammount of times I've had to put "don't recommend this channel" when doing so, because of that misogynistic ugly little twat popping up; it's not like it matches with ANYTHING I watch on there... so it's clear they have just been promoting his disgusting shit.
So well done Youtube for banning him... but also... FUCK YOU youtube
[–]ComebackDaddy 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
It’s not YouTubes fault.
It’s how the algorithm works.
It gives you two recommendations.
Shit you like and shit that may trigger you like no tomorrow based on the shit you like.
Also they were making money off him and the money has reached the plateau and it is better to ban him to mot piss off investors/sponsors than it is to keep him around.
YouTube is a business.
And business is all about the Benjamins.
[–]Tostitos153 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (17 children) | Copy Link
It’s strange to me how people don’t understand the concept of hate speech. If you preach hate speech, you will get cancelled. Period.
[–][deleted] 3 years ago (16 children) | Copy Link
[permanently deleted]
[–]Tostitos153 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link
When he describes women as his property, that crosses the line to bigotry, which is typically not tolerated in any sort of social media. Imagine being this dense 🤦♂️
[–]BornagainHOBOZEXUAL1 points 3 years ago [recovered] (13 children) | Copy Link
Go read the bible or any regious text. When a father gives his daughter away at the wedding, at the alter in a sense .. he was responsible for her . Now her husband will be. Its not like shes a piece of furniture, yall so fukn dumb and close minded. 🤡😂😂😂
[–]Tostitos153 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link
And if the women is not religious? Or doesn’t want to belong to anyone but herself? What then?
[–]BornagainHOBOZEXUAL1 points 3 years ago [recovered] (10 children) | Copy Link
Well then she has every right to leave and fuck off. He not gonna force her to be with him. You cant be this dense 😂😂😂
[–]Tostitos153 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link
She has a right to be with someone without being their property though. You realize these religious beliefs date back to when women ACTUALLY were property of men when they had little rights.
[–]BornagainHOBOZEXUAL1 points 3 years ago [recovered] (7 children) | Copy Link
God youre an idiot. You feminine men have been brainwashed by radical feminism 😂😂😂i feel sorry for you
[–]Tostitos153 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
Nothing else to add besides surface level insults. What a chump. Take this L and keep it moving 🤡
You literally couldnt rebut my claims lmaoooo Yall lost af. This generation of men is pathetic. How old are you? Grow some balls 🤡
[–]Tostitos1532 points 3 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
I responded to everything you said. You chose to try and insult me and keep moving the goal post. Stay in topic dude. You’re wasting my time.
[–]AutoModerator1 point 3 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]TreyTrey23 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Does this mean they're also gonna go after the thousands of accounts that upload his content as well all across social media?
My guess is they will remove it as ppl report them. So if they aren’t reported many of his clips will remain online through reposts
[–]throwback115 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Still got to deradicalization his supporters, or else he and people like him will still hold a place on the internet.
[–]PadThai42 5 points6 points7 points 3 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
I would never cheer on censorship. I do not agree with Tate on anything but deplatforming has never been a solution to anything.
[–]Q-9 3 points4 points5 points 3 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
He could always try to make his points the way it's not breaking rules of the platform.
[–]PadThai42 -2 points-1 points0 points 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Rules on apply when public opinion is strong enough. How is Travis Scott still selling music after several people died at his concert?
[–]Q-9 -2 points-1 points0 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
If taking similar example to Tate, Alex Jones was very popular and it didn't save him from obeying rules of the platform.
What rules? You sensitive feminine males crack me up 😂😂😂
[–]Unusual_Singer87982 points 3 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
https://www.reddit.com/r/Hasan_Piker/comments/w6jt5y/how_is_this_andrew_tate_video_not_more_widespread/?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share
Some people argue that the second Clip was consensual. Well the first Clip obviously isnt. She locks herself in the bath room...
[–]DisasterPeace7 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago* (20 children) | Copy Link
Cheering on people being de-platformed is a huge red flag just saying
A far as this in particular I'm not surprised, I don't agree with everything he said but I'd rather young boys watch him than somebody like Contrapoints, Derrick Jaxyn ( before he got caught) or that Matt guy on Instagram who kept complaining about him trying to get him de-platformed, but at the end of the day this is good because either his hardcore fans will be motivated or an even more extreme alternative will pop up, it was the feminist demonizing masculinity society that created guys like Andrew Tate and the cycle will just continue 🤷♂️
Any of these guys or podcasts that push for male excellence and male empowerment automatically become Public Enemy Number One when they get a big enough platform unless it pushes for guys to be borderline subservient to women, it is what it is
[–]coffeetablestain 3 points4 points5 points 3 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
but I'd rather young boys watch him than somebody like Contrapoints,
Lord in heaven forbid young boys learn about sociology instead of how to "train bitches."
[–]lunarwitch13 4 points5 points6 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
The guy you’re replying to married a 16 year old when he was 27, he’s a groomer 🤢
[–]coffeetablestain 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I'm not at all surprised, I could have eviscerated his comment but I just got the tone right away that it would be about as productive as beating my head against a concrete block.
People who blame abuse on victims (or the existence of abusers on the abused) are not really the kinds of people I like trying to change anymore as much as blocking and reporting.
[–]DisasterPeace7 -2 points-1 points0 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Lord in heaven forbid young boys learn about reaching their full potential instead of crying Massogany! all the time haha, I can do it too yay lol
[–]coffeetablestain 4 points5 points6 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
full potential
"constantly anxious and afraid of how you behave around women" is a difficult standard to achieve, but with enough hard work, a man can reach any height.
[–]DisasterPeace7 -1 points0 points1 point 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
If you say so lol
[–]RealRussShackleford 4 points5 points6 points 3 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link
Anyone who creates an entire army of teenage boys looking to earn $25 to repost their videos on thousands of channels, making the guy literally inescapable absolutely deserves deplatforming.
And while you’re completely wrong about his messaging, I didn’t even address it because my opinion would stay the same if he was utilizing the same tactics to spread the word about his soup recipes.
[–]DisasterPeace7 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
So he played the game that many other people in the internet do to a more effective way to grow his popularity, I'm not seeing a problem there
because my opinion would stay the same if he was utilizing the same tactics to spread the word about his soup recipes.
I'm not buying that but okay lol
[–]RealRussShackleford 4 points5 points6 points 3 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
Unlike your hero, I’m not selling anything.
[–]DisasterPeace7 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Sure thing lol
[–]BornagainHOBOZEXUAL1 points 3 years ago [recovered] (3 children) | Copy Link
But its ok to teach young boys and girls that gender fluidity is a thing and that hormone blockers are ok ? 😂😂😂
[–]RealRussShackleford 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
What in the hell does any of this have to do with MLM schemes?
[–]skon7[S] 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
As I said I’m not even a huge hater of the guy. I don’t like Myron and other men in this space though but I hear them and their struggles and they often have valid points. They just fail to recognize females POV as well and only see their own perspective. They also make fun of and attack women that they claim they don’t even want so I think that’s ridiculous and unnecessary. I think this movement is in response to a lot of issues that begin with women so I fully understand why men feel they’ve lost their voice and that figures like him are necessary.
Anyways……. I made this a few days ago for the fresh and fit sub but never got the opportunity to post it……. Lemme know what you think lol
https://voca.ro/1j0N24rY2kRC
[–]DisasterPeace7 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
As far as your overall question on there as far as what would be preferable sure it would be better if we all got along but human beings are tribalistic and we're going to look out for our own groups and social media has only Amplified that
[–]skon7[S] 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link
Yeah I get it but I guess I feel I’m Above it in maturity at times…… not to toot my own horn or anything 😂
Also some of the women he attacks have less options than him. I don’t feel too sorry for tate because he’s not exactly a guy who is hurting for girls unlike other men and some of the women he insults
🤡
So this is how I know you’re extremely unintelligent…… I actually like tate to some degree. Yes I know I made this post but I didn’t really say I supported the ban in the post. I just informed ppl of the ban, All I said was I understand both sides and that I actually, being a women and all, understand how men feel: seeing every angle and not being biased: and all you could do was hit me with a clown emoji? Grow a brain and also get a new avatar cause that man in your dp doesn’t not embody masculinity at all
[–]Artistic_Chip -13 points-12 points-11 points 3 years ago (36 children) | Copy Link
I do not believe in de-platforming. We may disagree with his message, but we should support his right to freedom of speech
[–]softnmushy 40 points41 points42 points 3 years ago (22 children) | Copy Link
Freedom of speech only applies to government entities. Businesses like Instagram and YouTube are free to restrict content however they like. Personally, I think they have moral responsibility to restrict content.
[–]Xx_SwordWords_xX 16 points17 points18 points 3 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link
And "freedom of speech" only exists in America. Most of the rest of the developed world has adopted laws around the UN's international laws against hate speech. As per ALL laws in existence; your freedom ends when it infringes on the rights or freedoms of others.
But as another commenter said, this doesn't even apply here, as private companies can make any rules they wish, to allow you to partake in their product or service.
[–]Outrageous_House2317 4 points5 points6 points 3 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link
Freedom of speech doesn’t infringe or anyones rights. No one’s forcing you to watch anything on social media, if the content bothers you, you can click don’t recommend, block them and keep it moving. And the ironic thing is, the same people who brag about hating Nazis are the same ones asking for people they disagree with to be deplatformed and censored…just like the Na-
Oh a lot of these UN countries that you love so much don’t give citizens basic civil liberties. If you criticize a government policy or a politician in countries likeCanada, they will arrest you. As I digress, nothings gonna change, someone will take his place in a year. Why’s that ? Because you failed to ask the question the question as to why that many men felt the need to get behind him. You didn’t try to find the issue that led them to getting behind Tate, all you did was throw around buzz words and censor people. It’s funny how they’ll let rappers on their who diss the dead and promote violence in black communities across America and have a problem having sexual suggestive content, which could leave to addictions way worse than bald dude talking shit on the internet.
I’m not for censoring anyone, unless they’re threatening and harassing people. I also understand that social media companies have the right to censor content that they just don’t like. But don’t lie and say you’re trying to protect men, when you don’t have a problem with murders, gang members, drug addicts, and p-stars promoting their lifestyles to young people. The difference between these issues and Andrew Tate, is they affect people in real life. Like I said they have the right to post what they want but don’t act holier than thou and talk about morals and protecting men when you don’t care.
[–]Xx_SwordWords_xX 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
You're a very lost boy.
[+]TheseSweetlnstincts -6 points-5 points-4 points 3 years ago* (4 children) | Copy Link
Even though I dislike Andrew Tate, and 95%of what he says is completely distorted and ridiculous. Saying something someone doesn't like is not an infringement on your rights. But yes, it unfortunately does not apply when it comes to companies like YouTube or Instagram.
[–]tiankai 8 points9 points10 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
It is an infringement of rights when he is parroting bs rethoric that takes women's rights back 100 years. Telling "women are your property" to lost young adults is dangerous, and I'm glad for once these megacorps are doing the right thing.
Too many people arguing here (about this), seem to lack the very basic understanding that women have any foundational rights to be threatened at all.
[–]TheseSweetlnstincts 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
What right is it infringing on?? I agree that it is dangerous and I don't think it's something people should follow, but there are plenty of other groups that spread ideas just as dangerous that aren't banned.
You could only have this opinion if you are not a member of the marganilised group being targeted.
As a woman, I can tell you that spreading this rhetoric does absolutely infringe on our rights to safety among the masses, and at home with our partners (who suddenly believe we are property).
[–]PutsWomenOnPedestal 8 points9 points10 points 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
It’s funny that people who whine about free speech as an excuse for hate speech don’t understand the context where free speech applies
Wheres the hate speech ? Lmaooo
[–]PutsWomenOnPedestal 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Misogyny is hate speech
[–]Pomeranian111-5 points 3 years ago [recovered] (4 children) | Copy Link
Disagree. He gained a following for a reason. Nobody pointed a gun at these dudes heads to consume his content. These social media platforms making the decision doesn't help anyone, only the ad money the platforms get.
Men need to make the choice themselves to change or look at dating from a different perspective.
I'm sorry, but as a guy, Andrew Tate getting the following he did so quickly shows a lot of men are gross.
Nothing will change, there will be a new Andrew Tate and the cycle will repeat, cancelling him only makes what he says even stronger, which I predict will radicalize these men even further. This isn't a big win for anyone.
[–]SteelRazorBlade 15 points16 points17 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
I think there is a degree of truth to the idea that there will always be other people with similar ideas who will get popular (maybe not as popular) but still big nonetheless. (They should be banned too imo).
What I am not in agreement with is the idea that cancelling him will in some way make him stronger. This is simply untrue. The overwhelming majority of far right ideologues who primarily gain their traction via social media run out of steam once they are deplatformed. Every time. This idea that “de-platforming doesn’t help” is somewhat of a myth.
[–]Pomeranian111-3 points 3 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
What I am not in agreement with is the idea that cancelling him will in some way make him stronger.
Not him specifically, but his followers will only grow more hatred. Bill Burr had a bit years ago where his take was firing a guy who hates gay people, and throwing him on the street without a job will make him even more hateful, and wouldn't solve the problem that he still hates gay people. I believe that's what is going on here, the dudes who willingly follow this guy need help, and their form of help shouldn't just be the the platforms whitewashing the content so you're forced to not look at it anymore.
[–][deleted] 8 points9 points10 points 3 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link
He gained a following for a reason.
He wasn't organically grown. The numbers were fudged. It's part of many reasons why he's getting canned.
Nobody pointed a gun at these dudes heads to consume his content.
Technically, no. But there were LOTS of brainwashing tactics, dark patterns, and manipulations going on. Technically they're responsible, but if informed consent isn't going to be a thing, then we can't cry rape when someone actually rapes us because as the famous old Daddy of Red Pill, Machiavelli, says, 'If they're stupid enough to get conned, they probably deserve it.' All people are doing now is proving the inconsistencies with Reverse Uno cards and mirroring. The hamsters are real for men too.
[–]Pomeranian111-7 points 3 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
'If they're stupid enough to get conned, they probably deserve it.'
I believe this to be true, all these men willingly choose to grow his influence, this isn't 1930's Germany. Men can open their eyes and see the backlash, and what Women have to say about his content.
I have more sympathy for the blackpill people because majority have invisible experiences with women, or underlying mental health problems.
The Redpill is a totally different beast though, lots of these men aren't lonely virgins who are sad, they're grown ass men who have had, or are in a relationship when they find the redpill, but decide that manipulating women and treating them like children is the missing dynamic in their life.
[–]oneblackcoffeeplease 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
bold of you to assume governments dont have a say in what content is ok and which is not
[+]Artistic_Chip -13 points-12 points-11 points 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
I understand it is a government thing, but I still would like the "digital town square" to remain open to everyone, no matter what. I disagree with private companies restricting speech as moral, I don't think the employees at YouTube should be able to make the choice of what is and what is not moral
[–]Xx_SwordWords_xX 10 points11 points12 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
So easy to say when it isn't your demographic being targeted, and left feeling unsafe among this rhetoric.
[–]Artistic_Chip -2 points-1 points0 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Andrew Tate will move to rumble likely, he may even get a nice contract to be exclusive with them. Tate may come out of this richer than before
[–]skon7[S] 9 points10 points11 points 3 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link
The ppl called and Petitioned for it collectively. They aren’t restricting people out of their own interests. YouTube literally will lose profits over andrew tate being deplatformed
[–]skon7[S] 25 points26 points27 points 3 years ago* (10 children) | Copy Link
when it’s on a media platform it’s a bit different…. The words he speaks become part of the common groupthink and influence other men to treat and talk to women this way as well , which then can have detrimental affects on the lives of others, groups of ppl who might already be marginalized
It’s one things not to suppress people and what they say, but what if those words suppress peoples lives? And have real world consequences?
He’s still allowed to have his freedom of speech, he just isn’t allowed to have a platform for it. Plus apparently he removed his own twitch material though I believe he was probably advised to without choice
[–]Xx_SwordWords_xX 5 points6 points7 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Exactly. If he's not in jail, he's still FREE.
[–]Outrageous_House2317 -3 points-2 points-1 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Dude you can’t play the whole moral high ground game. These platforms don’t really cared about the mental health or well being of young men or anyone. They have no problem with promoting music artist rapping about violent crimes, dissing dead people and promoting gang violence. Those social platforms have the right to do whatever they please in terms of moderation but don’t act holier than thou. Let’s just be real here, there were people up top didn’t like him and they got him knocked off, there will another one of him in a year.
FYI pornography, gang violence, drugs and naive dating advice are a million times more dangerous and detrimental to young mens lives, than some bald dude on the internet calling himself a “Top G”.
He didn’t just call himself a top G lol…Did you not follow his content? Personally I actually didn’t think he was as bad as some other manosphere guys and I didn’t call for his ban or removal so vehemently but those platforms took action because a huge petition demanded it. The people demanded it. Not enough ppl have demanded gang violence associated with larger pubic figures and other things like that be removed. However they certainly would remove it if the ppl collectively called for it. You’re right they aren’t acting from their own moral high ground but from the interests of the people who are effected by it and push for change.
And Twitter allows pornography but IG doesn’t. It’s safe to say the people don’t wanna log into Ig and see peoples genitalia. Obviously half naked is allowed since that’s now become the norm in terms of what is sexually appropriate in our society today. Otherwise I have no idea what “porn” you’re talking about on YouTube or IG or TikTok. Literally never seen “actual” porn that wasn’t taken down off there in my entire life lol
[–]Artistic_Chip -5 points-4 points-3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Yea it's interesting that YouTube profits on keeping ppl engaged as much as possible. Tate engaged a lot of people for a long time to the platform and he was removed. He was literally addictive and they removed him
[–]Artistic_Chip -4 points-3 points-2 points 3 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
I agree is his speech is a bad influence on younger men, but I think a better way to deal with him is for others to dismantle his claims based on science ( kinda what we are trying to do). I think it's a dangerous slippery slope when it comes to de-platforming
[–]InnsmouthMotel 5 points6 points7 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
The thing is de platforming works, whereas engaging in these claims just adds justification to them, especially when if you enter into a debate with them they will say they won regardless of the outcome
[–]Artistic_Chip 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Andrew tate will move on to Rumble or some other platform. He draws too much traffic to be left alone
[–]InnsmouthMotel 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Right, but his scope is massively reduced. Trump still posts on truth but its less impactful than being on twitter
[–]beigs 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Private companies choosing the material they would like to have on their platform is pretty much as capitalist as you get. Unless you want the government to start forcing them to have misogynistic / racist hate speech on their platform…
[–]Artistic_Chip 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I agree that private companies can make these decisions. I just think the public's trust in then is misled. Tate will move onto alternate platforms, rumble or something else may even make a deal with him. He could come out of this much richer
[–]Tostitos153 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I believe his freedom of speech was removed when he started using hate speech.
[–]oneblackcoffeeplease -3 points-2 points-1 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
YES!
[–]Fuckxanaxx -1 points0 points1 point 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Free TOP G
[–]StannGrozev1 points 3 years ago [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link
How many pathetic feminists are here 😂
[–]StannGrozev1 points 3 years ago [recovered] (3 children) | Copy Link
Men, embrace the masculinity!
[–]Copperstoner 7 points8 points9 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
I do! I still cheer about the fatct that this certificated internet douche is gone from Youtube, Twitch and Tik Tok for now.
[–]HNIC2 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
At least they didnt do him what they did to Kevin Samuels
Which was what? Celebrate his death??
L YouTube
[–]pnandiv 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Literally playing the same charicature dick masterson did on dr Phil, the guy is a master troll. If you take anything he says serious and follow him, you are a moron. If you think he is actually being serious about his beliefs, you are also a moron.
[–]patheticinsecurelser 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Maybe it’s for his own good
it’s about time , bros edging 40 man cmon
[–]smkillin 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
All of this is ok with people until those who you like are eon the cancel list. It will happen, this is a slippery slope to facistic censorship.
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.created by /u/dream-hunter
[–]2_cider_jack 34 points35 points36 points (11 children) | Copy Link
[–]BornagainHOBOZEXUAL1 points [recovered] (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]AutoModerator[M] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Unusual_Singer8798 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]StannGrozev -15 points-14 points-13 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–]Yonroe 27 points28 points29 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Icy_Professional3138 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Tostitos153 10 points11 points12 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]BornagainHOBOZEXUAL1 points [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]AutoModerator[M] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]2_cider_jack 8 points9 points10 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]AutoModerator[M] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]spiraldinosaur 69 points70 points71 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]AssignmentWest7267 10 points11 points12 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]Gino195 -10 points-9 points-8 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]spiraldinosaur 6 points7 points8 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]2020mademejoinreddit 21 points22 points23 points (10 children) | Copy Link
[–]skon7[S] 11 points12 points13 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Drwfyytrre 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Particular_Fall_9708 -1 points0 points1 point (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]2020mademejoinreddit 3 points4 points5 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]Particular_Fall_9708 0 points1 point2 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]2020mademejoinreddit 2 points3 points4 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Particular_Fall_9708 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]2020mademejoinreddit 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]doneshitmypantsagain 53 points54 points55 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]skon7[S] 41 points42 points43 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]RealRussShackleford 7 points8 points9 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]GrayMouser12 2 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]summakamlaude21 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]JUST_WANTTOBEHAPPY 17 points18 points19 points (20 children) | Copy Link
[–]skon7[S] 9 points10 points11 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]JUST_WANTTOBEHAPPY 7 points8 points9 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]skon7[S] 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]MentalAlternative8 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]MentalAlternative8 9 points10 points11 points (14 children) | Copy Link
[–]kalu777 0 points1 point2 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]MentalAlternative8 2 points3 points4 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]kalu777 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]kalu777 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]tms79 -1 points0 points1 point (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]MentalAlternative8 1 point2 points3 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]tms79 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]MentalAlternative8 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]tms79 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]BornagainHOBOZEXUAL1 points [recovered] (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]MentalAlternative8 4 points5 points6 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]MemeGoddessAsteria 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]AutoModerator[M] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]No-Recording-8670 12 points13 points14 points (8 children) | Copy Link
[–]skon7[S] 13 points14 points15 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–]No-Recording-8670 5 points6 points7 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]skon7[S] 7 points8 points9 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]HNIC2 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]skon7[S] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]BornagainHOBOZEXUAL1 points [recovered] (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]skon7[S] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]AutoModerator[M] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]The-Guy-In-Grey 25 points26 points27 points (10 children) | Copy Link
[–]cashcapone96 4 points5 points6 points (9 children) | Copy Link
[–]skon7[S] 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]ResponsibleAd2541 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]The-Guy-In-Grey -1 points0 points1 point (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]cashcapone96 0 points1 point2 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]The-Guy-In-Grey 0 points1 point2 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]serd12 0 points1 point2 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]The-Guy-In-Grey 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]BornagainHOBOZEXUAL1 points [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]AutoModerator[M] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]JonF1 16 points17 points18 points (10 children) | Copy Link
[–]globalholiday50901 points [recovered] (9 children) | Copy Link
[–]JonF1 0 points1 point2 points (8 children) | Copy Link
[–]globalholiday509010 points [recovered] (7 children) | Copy Link
[–]Yalahabibi6969 7 points8 points9 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Drwfyytrre 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]ResponsibleAd2541 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]JonF1 0 points1 point2 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]globalholiday50901 points [recovered] (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]JonF1 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]globalholiday50901 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]mynameisburner 6 points7 points8 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]skon7[S] 3 points4 points5 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]mynameisburner 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]PapaSanjay 2 points3 points4 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–]skon7[S] 2 points3 points4 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]PapaSanjay 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]BornagainHOBOZEXUAL1 points [recovered] (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]skon7[S] 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]AutoModerator[M] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]kalu777 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]skon7[S] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]J-in-the-UK 2 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]ComebackDaddy 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Tostitos153 2 points3 points4 points (17 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] (16 children) | Copy Link
[–]Tostitos153 2 points3 points4 points (14 children) | Copy Link
[–]BornagainHOBOZEXUAL1 points [recovered] (13 children) | Copy Link
[–]Tostitos153 2 points3 points4 points (11 children) | Copy Link
[–]BornagainHOBOZEXUAL1 points [recovered] (10 children) | Copy Link
[–]Tostitos153 2 points3 points4 points (8 children) | Copy Link
[–]BornagainHOBOZEXUAL1 points [recovered] (7 children) | Copy Link
[–]Tostitos153 2 points3 points4 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]BornagainHOBOZEXUAL1 points [recovered] (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]Tostitos1532 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]AutoModerator1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]AutoModerator[M] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]AutoModerator[M] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]AutoModerator[M] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]AutoModerator[M] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]TreyTrey23 2 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]skon7[S] 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]throwback115 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]PadThai42 5 points6 points7 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]Q-9 3 points4 points5 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]PadThai42 -2 points-1 points0 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]Q-9 -2 points-1 points0 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]BornagainHOBOZEXUAL1 points [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]AutoModerator[M] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Unusual_Singer87982 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]DisasterPeace7 0 points1 point2 points (20 children) | Copy Link
[–]coffeetablestain 3 points4 points5 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]lunarwitch13 4 points5 points6 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]coffeetablestain 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]DisasterPeace7 -2 points-1 points0 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]coffeetablestain 4 points5 points6 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]DisasterPeace7 -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]RealRussShackleford 4 points5 points6 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–]DisasterPeace7 0 points1 point2 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]RealRussShackleford 4 points5 points6 points
(5 children) | Copy Link
[–]DisasterPeace7 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]BornagainHOBOZEXUAL1 points [recovered] (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]RealRussShackleford 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]AutoModerator[M] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]AutoModerator[M] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]skon7[S] 1 point2 points3 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]DisasterPeace7 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]skon7[S] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]BornagainHOBOZEXUAL1 points [recovered] (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]skon7[S] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]AutoModerator[M] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Artistic_Chip -13 points-12 points-11 points (36 children) | Copy Link
[–]softnmushy 40 points41 points42 points (22 children) | Copy Link
[–]Xx_SwordWords_xX 16 points17 points18 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–]Outrageous_House2317 4 points5 points6 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Xx_SwordWords_xX 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]TheseSweetlnstincts -6 points-5 points-4 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]tiankai 8 points9 points10 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Xx_SwordWords_xX 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]TheseSweetlnstincts 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Xx_SwordWords_xX 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]PutsWomenOnPedestal 8 points9 points10 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]BornagainHOBOZEXUAL1 points [recovered] (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]PutsWomenOnPedestal 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]AutoModerator[M] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Pomeranian111-5 points [recovered] (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]SteelRazorBlade 15 points16 points17 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Pomeranian111-3 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 8 points9 points10 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Pomeranian111-7 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]oneblackcoffeeplease 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]Artistic_Chip -13 points-12 points-11 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]Xx_SwordWords_xX 10 points11 points12 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Artistic_Chip -2 points-1 points0 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]skon7[S] 9 points10 points11 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]skon7[S] 25 points26 points27 points (10 children) | Copy Link
[–]Xx_SwordWords_xX 5 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Outrageous_House2317 -3 points-2 points-1 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]skon7[S] 9 points10 points11 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Artistic_Chip -5 points-4 points-3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Artistic_Chip -4 points-3 points-2 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]InnsmouthMotel 5 points6 points7 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Artistic_Chip 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]InnsmouthMotel 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]beigs 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Artistic_Chip 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Tostitos153 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]oneblackcoffeeplease -3 points-2 points-1 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Fuckxanaxx -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]StannGrozev1 points [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]AutoModerator[M] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]StannGrozev1 points [recovered] (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]Copperstoner 7 points8 points9 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]AutoModerator[M] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]HNIC2 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]skon7[S] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Icy_Professional3138 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]pnandiv 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]patheticinsecurelser 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]smkillin 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link