Hi, I’ve been lurking in this sub for a while, as I am having some doubts about the Redpill but there are some things about the Redpill that I have yet to see people truly debunk and these are the main ones I have questions on:

Game - I saw a post on this sub that said Game is not useful meanwhile admitting that it has worked before. So if Game is not useful, how else can the average guy get a woman interested in him if he does not have wealth, status or an abundant social life? In this dating scene it’s almost impossible to skate by as an average guy unless you’re willing to date below your preference.

Hypergamy - I get that the idea of this is a hard pill to swallow (no pun intended) for a lot guys. But if people can switch jobs for better perks and higher pay then what makes you think that women won’t leave for a guy they deem better than their current bf? And I already know you guys might say “Well if she left maybe she was mistreated in her last relationship.” Really? Are all relationships that end because of hypergamy, end due to mistreatment? Or is it simply because she thinks she found someone better?

The Bad Boy Archetype - Any guy who has partaken in the dating game and failed, has seen the “Bad Boy” get the girl and then try to learn some sort of PUA game to earn similar success. It happens and continues to happen, Why? Because it’s clear the “Bad Boy” succeeds in dating compared to the good ole Nice guy. So if it doesn’t work or doesn’t exist then why do guys still adopt the archetype to succeed in dating and why do women still fall for it?

I’m open to here you guys’ thoughts on why you think I’m wrong and your argument to debunk them.