TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • Other

      • /r/AllPillDebate
      • /r/AlreadyRed
      • /r/altTRP
      • /r/AntiFeminists
      • /r/askFDS
      • /r/askMRP
      • /r/askRPC
      • /r/becomeaman
      • /r/BlackPillScience
      • /r/Chadfish
      • /r/Divorce_Men
      • /r/EverydayMisandry
      • /r/ExRedPill
      • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
      • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
      • /r/GEOTRP
      • /r/MalePsychology
      • /r/Male_Studies
      • /r/MenSupportMen
      • /r/MGTOW2
      • /r/MuslimRedPill
      • /r/newTRP
      • /r/PussyPass
      • /r/PussyPassDenied
      • /r/RedPillBooks
      • /r/RedPillParenting
      • /r/RedPillWives
      • /r/RedPillWomen
      • /r/RedPillWorkplace
      • /r/RPChristians
      • /r/ThankTRP
      • /r/TheRedPillStories
      • /r/trpGAME
      • /r/TRPOffTopic
      • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
      • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • A Voice for Men
    • Dalrock
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Heartiste
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • Return of Kings
    • The Power Moves
    • The Rational Male
    • The Spearhead
    • Other

      • Alpha Game
      • Archwinger
      • Artful Prudence
      • Black Label Logic
      • Caleb Jones
      • Captain Capitalism
      • Corporate Machiavelli
      • Days of Game
      • Deep Strength
      • Dicipres
      • Donal Graeme
      • Female Misogynist
      • Free Northerner
      • Gaming My Wife
      • Hawaiian Libertarian
      • Illimitable Men
      • In Mala Fide
      • Kill Your Inner Loser
      • KillToParty
      • Krauser PUA
      • LaidNYC
      • NO MA'AM
      • Omega Virgin Revolt
      • Pook's Mill
      • Random Xpat Rantings
      • Red Pill Theory
      • Red Pill Wifery
      • RedPillDad
      • RedPillDoctor
      • Rian Stone
      • RooshV
      • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
      • Sigma Frame
      • The Feminine Woman
      • The Futurist
      • The Masculine Principle
      • The Modern Man
      • The New Modern Man
      • The Obsidian Files
      • The Private Man
      • The Red Pill Room
      • The Red Quest
      • The Rules Revisited
      • Troy Francis
      • Wintery Knight
      • Woujo
      • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Support

Biden administration guts due process protections for students accused of sexual misconduct; "Under new regulations, Title IX investigators can deny students access to the evidence against them"

Heavy_Grand2526

September 20, 2022
661 upvotes
/r/MensRights
https://reason.com/2022/09/15/biden-guts-title-ix-due-process/
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Support the archive

Everything here was supposed to disappear. Banned subreddits, deleted communities, cancelled blogs — much of what is archived here survives nowhere else.

It stays free — no paywall, no account — for the next man who comes looking, the way it was free for you.

I pay for the servers, the storage and the bandwidth myself. If you want this record still standing in ten years, become one of the people who keeps it online.

Support the archive

Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title Biden administration guts due process protections for students accused of sexual misconduct; "Under new regulations, Title IX investigators can deny students access to the evidence against them"
Author

Heavy_Grand2526

Upvotes 661
Comments 107
Date September 20, 2022 10:54 PM UTC
(3 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/xjnblc/biden_administration_guts_due_process_protections/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/biden-administration-guts-due-process-protections.1132295
https://theredarchive.com/post/1132295
Top posts by Heavy_Grand2526

"#MeToo is over if we don’t listen to ‘imperfect victims’ like Amber Heard"; Gross article denies Men can be victims of abuse & encourages people to never believe Men. Individuals such as this are why so many Men feel uncomfortable about opening up or seeking support.

2289 upvotes
May 23, 2022
/r/MensRights

"I'm a mom who flies in business class while my family stays in economy. We see it as a lesson on feminism."

1500 upvotes
June 11, 2023
/r/MensRights

Miami OnlyFans model captured on video beating boyfriend she later killed

1444 upvotes
August 11, 2022
/r/MensRights

"A man whose partner used a broken dinner plate to kill him had "stayed silent" about the abuse he faced, according to his friends. The friends set up the Paul Lavelle Foundation, encouraging more men to speak out about their experiences of domestic abuse."

1388 upvotes
May 20, 2022
/r/MensRights

Johnny Depp lands first major role after being 'cancelled': Embattled actor to play King Louis XV

1388 upvotes
January 26, 2022
/r/MensRights

Young men today feel they must be six feet tall, make six figures, and have six inches downstairs to get a girlfriend—so many have given up trying

1284 upvotes
September 15, 2023
/r/MensRights

Mindy Kaling admitted to non-consensually kissing a co-star on her show, threatening the producers of firing them if they told anyone

1269 upvotes
January 20, 2023
/r/MensRights

If it takes this much pain & suffering for someone as wealthy/famous as Johnny Depp to get justice, imagine the amount of struggling the average man goes through in a False Accusation

1163 upvotes
April 25, 2022
/r/MensRights

Comments

[–]Bland-fantasie 225 points226 points227 points 3 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Why world they need to game the system to prevent the defence from getting exculpatory evidence?

Oh right, quotas.

[–]TracyMorganFreeman 89 points90 points91 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Virtue is hard. Virtue signaling is easy.

[–]IronJohnMRA 10 points11 points12 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Oh I like that!

[–]rocker12341234 23 points24 points25 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

joe spent 8 years creeping on kids in the background of Obamas speeches. of course he'd rig the system against kids

[–]Mother-Key582 5 points6 points7 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I can’t believe how he literally admitted that he LOVES when children sit on his lap … on LIVE TV during a speech and people just go “ehh, whatever.” It’s disgusting.

[–]rocker12341234 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

whats worse is people says theres zero evidence of him being a creep.... there's multiple yt videos dedicated to compilations to his creepiness on live tv. how that cunts still walking the streets a free man is beyond me lol

[–]MRA_TitleIX 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Because it later shows up in court. Despite the issues and lack of protections in Title ix tribunals, the evidence used is admissible in court, and the defense may never have a chance to view the whole story.

It's a racket to stage biased evidence in court and deprive rights to all evidence there.

[–]octalanax 103 points104 points105 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Because there was too much justice in our farcical legal judicial system, we have had to set up a second tier at the collegiate level, where defendants are presumed guilty and somehow have even fewer legal rights.

[–]Scandi_Navy 4 points5 points6 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Biden suffers from some kind of old age dementia. I'm pretty sure someone just gave him crayons and a rubber stamp to get whatever they want passed.

[–]WingsofSky 74 points75 points76 points 3 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

Looks like a "Mine field" to me.

[–]mixing_saws 48 points49 points50 points 3 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

It is. They want males out of higher education so women get all the good jobs.

[–]Doing_It_In_The_Butt 53 points54 points55 points 3 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

It's still not the case everywhere, but a growing minority in the tech industry are caring about degrees less and less. So it will backfire.

Soon ontop of gender quotas in industry we will also have a push from HR to ensure quality we need to higher graduates (a round the back way to help women more).

I keep discussing with my female friends and wife that guys (who do form management clubs) are disapaiting and now the management clubs are by class. More over, HR forms a female club and they are by far more recklessly discriminatory than any guy management clubs I have seen. If women are the future in all management, I don't expect to be treated fairly in the slightest.

I get told that I am full of shit, ignoring their lived expirence, maybe guys need to be taken down a peg because they got a free ride anyway. I am being a sexist pig trying to minimise what they see as the issue.

I don't think they understand what it's like to be a guy, no one helps you at all. Sometimes you have superficial fraternal bonds with guys higher up but it doesn't really give you any other leg up except that the management feels they can speak freely without walking on eggshells and that in turn builds repour.

The whole thing is fucked, western women are brainwashed to be offended at this, reject that, but I rarely find independent thinking is going on in relation to gender relations except the emotional justification arguments feminist taught them.

The worst part is the reason feminism has a foot hold in our institutions is that people have wives girlfriends or hopeful to get one, and you can't be outspoken about it without getting a earful from your partner.

You can't discuss actual equality (not equity) without getting a earful of extremely emotional tiered and unfalsafiable arguments.

Sorry for the rant on your comment.

[–]Huffers1010 27 points28 points29 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I don't think they understand what it's like to be a guy, no one helps you at all.

Of course they don't. That's not their lived experience. That's your lived experience. But somehow it doesn't count...

[–]mixing_saws 13 points14 points15 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It doesnt count because they see men as subhumans. Just like the nazis see jews as subhuman. Im waiting for reeducation camps for men to appear.

[–]Input_output_error 10 points11 points12 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I get told that I am full of shit, ignoring their lived expirence, maybe
guys need to be taken down a peg because they got a free ride anyway. I
am being a sexist pig trying to minimise what they see as the issue.

The cognitive dissonance is real.. Maybe they need to listen to your lived experience and these women need to be taken down a peg because of the free rides they're getting.

[–]heyyy-kiddo 8 points9 points10 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

In the long run this will backfire so spectacularly they will not know what train hit them.

Relationships are already a bussiness kind of deal with marriage rates dropping and men looking only for FWB aka sex and nothing more,even better once escorting will be more like a monthly expense,you pay upfront for your needs or just take care of them yourself,you don't bother with companionship and the legal aspects of sharing a living space.

This in turn means more men won't give a f*** about women and the job market will be under performance pressure(competing with emerging countries on key areas is tough so you need actual competence ,not quotas).

In the end it will be everybody for itself and they won't like it.....

Also a lot of jobs are outsourced it seems,now you can change countries and have a similar level of pay ,but benefit from reduced cost of living,just saying.

[–]mixing_saws 3 points4 points5 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

But if we always say nothing because of fear nothing will change. If a women doesnt acknowledge also the struggles im and many other men are facing, ill stop dating her.

[–][deleted] -5 points-4 points-3 points 3 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

Why are you even dating women if you compare them to nazis who look at you like a subhuman Jew ready to put you in a “reeducation camp” like you just commented?

Wtf lol 😂

[–]ALazySusan1 points 3 years ago [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link

Sorry that your female friends/family don't understand. My wife, friends, and family members all understand how discrimination based on race/gender is a losing game. My wife, mother in law, and my own mother all refuse to work in a female dominated workplace due to all of the drama associated with it now. They recognize that their success in that space will be determined based upon what clique they fall into amongst the other women, and not their actual merit/output.

I think the best illustration of this is when you talk to women of an older generation. They see what all of this is behind all of the smoke and mirrors. They understand the different roles that men and women play.

[–]mixing_saws 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

True equality could work easily if feminists wouldnt be misandristic pigs.

[–]NutsLikeMelons 142 points143 points144 points 3 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

"If a college student is to be marked for life as a sexual predator, it is reasonable to require that he be provided a fair opportunity to defend himself and an impartial arbiter to make that decision."

He. Not they. He.

[–]Agreeable_Squirrel64 37 points38 points39 points 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

What makes you think GIRLS can't be sexual predators?

It may not get much publicity but I'm sure it happens.

[–]shit-zen-giggles 56 points57 points58 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It happens a lot.

But to feminists need those purpetrators and victims to stay invisible since their existance goes against feminist ideology.

That's why.

[–]Handle-me-timber 8 points9 points10 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Because men can’t be raped. Didn’t you know that? I hate feminists. But you can title ix women too, you just have to file first. 🤦🏼

[–]greyman0425 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It happens more than people realize, how ever the rules rarely get applied that way.

[–]Clemicus 51 points52 points53 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

These judges, like many other critics, viewed Obama's Title IX rules, which Biden is now copying, as fundamentally unfair.

It was Biden all along

Vice President Biden Announces Strengthening of Title IX

Washington, D.C. - Today, Vice President Biden announced that the Administration has issued a ‘Dear Colleague’ letter that withdraws a 2005 interpretation of Title IX policy. Enacted in 1972, Title IX mandates that any educational institution receiving federal funding for programs and activities cannot discriminate on the basis of sex.

https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/vice-president-biden-announces-strengthening-title-ix

[–]mrDeStorm 4 points5 points6 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Well, yeah. That's not news.

[–]manicraccoon 56 points57 points58 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I know you are innocent Jimmy, but you are a cishet white male and we have quotas to fill and agendas to push. To the chopping block.

[–]mixing_saws 9 points10 points11 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

At that point just say you are genderfluid or gay or whatever.

[–]wildwolfcore 19 points20 points21 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Repeat after me "I am a masculine presenting transgender lesbian".

[–]BecomeABenefit 10 points11 points12 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Does this administration ever NOT go full authortarian?

[–]aries0413 52 points53 points54 points 3 years ago (21 children) | Copy Link

Go to a trade school instead spend 1/3 and less of this crap to deal with.

[–]Sininenn 36 points37 points38 points 3 years ago (19 children) | Copy Link

And spend the rest of your life working a physically demanding job, ruining your health and dying younger.

The answer to anti-male university practices is not in blue collar jobs.

[–]sonickid101 10 points11 points12 points 3 years ago (15 children) | Copy Link

I've worked blue-collar jobs and office jobs. I've not convinced the sedentary lifestyle of an office job is especially more healthy than a job that has you on your feet moving around.

[–]Handle-me-timber 4 points5 points6 points 3 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link

Exactly. Sitting at a desk for 40 years will do much worse to you than a sore knees and back. They say if you’re capable of 40 push-ups, you’re at significantly lower risk of heart attack. If you maintain a healthy diet and maintain the gym, you’ll look better, feel better, and be more competent at life skills than any office worker. 😂

[–]StrangePractice 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

You’re forgetting office workers who go to the gym

[–]Handle-me-timber 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah they would be in approximately the same position.

[–]Sininenn 5 points6 points7 points 3 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

Um yeah, no.

Most blue collar jobs are much, much more physically demanding than the equivalent of '40 push-ups', or a 'sore back and knees'.

[–]Handle-me-timber 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

You work in an office? Working class infighting is counter productive. 40 push-ups is just the literal statline that was given as a minimum physical engagement.

[–]Sininenn 3 points4 points5 points 3 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

Have you ever worked a blue collar job?

I worked in a pickling factory, offered food samples in a supermarket while on my feet for 8 hours straight, I delivering mail on a bicycle in hurricane weathers, and waited tables at a restaurant under a crazy boss.

All of these jobs paid a pittance, were during fucked up hours that interfered with my sleep and were physically damaging my health, usually due to me having to carry heavy loads on my back, and caused me to suffer damages to my social life, as well as made me come home exhausted and wanting to do nothing else but sleep, with a crushed soul.

You can avoid office drama. You can't avoid fucking up your health because jour job is wringing every last ounce of your energy out of you at 5am.

[–]Handle-me-timber 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

Absolutely. I work one now because I hated sitting in an office. It isn’t about office drama either, it’s about sitting in one place all day. I’ve also worked overnight and yeah I get it. I got out of that shit so fast. 10% raise ain’t worth it.

[–]Sininenn 5 points6 points7 points 3 years ago* (6 children) | Copy Link

Not every university-education job is 100% sitting in an office, and there are different levels of physical demands in different blue collar jobs.

That being said, it is undeniable that working manual labor is not only physically damaging, it also pays less and as a result provides a lower quality of life. You equating it to 'moving around' and a 'sore back and knees' is extremely misleading. Physically intensive labor causes long-term damage you will become aware of over time.

This is not about 'working class infighting'. This is about you, along with op, suggesting that working class jobs are the salvation for men's oppression, when the only thing they achieve is being society's workhorses. No thank you.

I will say it again, in order to end this conversation once and for all.

Blue collar jobs are not the answer to anti-male universities.

[–]Handle-me-timber 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

If that office that you aren’t in 100% of the time told you to spend more time at the desk. You don’t have that choice. And yeah my argument was that sitting at a desk will kill you much faster (spare the accidental deaths). Ya know obesity and heart disease are the top killers of people and if you combine all cancers, it’s comparable to obesity. I think you’ll find that office dwellers also have T levels much lower than laborers, resulting in significantly less energy and other lifestyle problems.

I fully agreed about it not fixing the problem. In fact I said in a separate comment that the only way to fix it is to use this law against women before they even get the chance. Not only will they have lenient judgement and no future discrimination by employers, but they also will cause lobbying for the banning of men using it, and it will be scrubbed entirely for discrimination.

[–]Sininenn1 point 3 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

"And yeah my argument was that sitting at a desk will kill you much faster"

Yeah, I get that this was your argument, but you are wrong.

You can always go to the gym or exercise in your free time, in order to get a healthy amount of movement, after having spent the work day at the office. Not just that, you can take short breaks whwre you stand up from your chair and stretch out, or even get rid of the chair completely and have a standing desk.

But you can't 'unwork' all the physically damaging work you've done at your job.

Damage, which, by the way, compounds over time and fucks you up when you turn 50.

If you can't comprehend this, then we're done with this conversation.

[–]Handle-me-timber1 point 3 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

It’s no coincidence that going to the gym will counter most of the issues you get there, but it will also counter most of the issues you get at a labor job. It won’t stop the joint damage sure. But it does prevent injury in muscles and joints. The only 50 year olds I’ve met that aren’t fucked up are the ones who work out. My father loves to work outside after his desk job to get his activity, it doesn’t stop him from being wrecked all the same.

[–]Sininenn1 point 3 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

You're being obtuse now.

If the problem is lack of exercise, then exercise is the solution.

But if the problem is too much exercise, (read, too much physical activity), then more physical activity is not the solution.

Overworking your muscles, joints and ligaments is not 'preventing injury', but a surefire way to cause it.

Yeah, cool. Have you wondered that those 50year olds only have the energy to work out because their job doesn't physically ruin them already?

You know what? Don't answer. You wouldn't be honest with us, or with yourself anyway.

[–]Handle-me-timber1 point 3 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Gyms aren’t just for lifting to muscle failure you know. It’s also for proactive therapy, stretching, injury recovery, etc. if you follow professional lifters you’ll recognize that they don’t try to max everyday. They don’t even do it everyday. Low resistance exercise can be very therapeutic for problem areas, and proper muscle maintenance will prevent joint injury. This isn’t an argument. This is me pointing out that the gym is still quite beneficial even to people who are doing labor intensive jobs.

[–]Sininenn1 point 3 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Yeah, no dude.

Injury recovery is not done at the gym, but at a doctor's office.

I know, because I had done back exercises at one.

And while it may be true that regular exercise is beneficial for everyone, the fact of the matter remains that labor jobs will fuck you up, and no amount of exercise will prevent that.

How is that so hard for you to understand? Are you seriously not able to understand that a lifetime of physical labor ruins one's health???

[–]Sininenn 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

If it was only 'om your feet moving around ', then it would not be an issue.

But most blue collar jobs require much much more physically intensive labor than just 'moving around'.

[–]Flyb0mb 7 points8 points9 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Giving up on university is not the answer, I agree. Giving up on that crock of shit idealogy they're teaching is though.

If I would've known I could get my student loans forgiven, I would've made that pricey choice. But then I remembered I'm a white male with privilege. The privilege to pay my own way.

Ruining your health with a physically demanding job or ruining your health by sitting in an office chair in a cubicle all day. Pick your poison I guess.

[–]SunosUnix 8 points9 points10 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Lol, take it from a sysadmin who became a mechanic. It ain't in white collar jobs, thats for damn sure.

[–]DueDelivery -1 points0 points1 point 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yea and these blue collar asshole boomer types are horrible pieces of shit. Sure I'd probably take them over SJWs but they're not much better

[–]Billy-Batdorf 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yes every man should stop being in intellectual positions and influencing the world, good idea, hvac repairman.

[–]needalife94 22 points23 points24 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Jesus fucking christ. This is sad. :/

[–]matrixislife 19 points20 points21 points 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Sounds like an immediate court case as soon as a defendant is officially notified that he can't see the evidence. Would there be justification for criminal charges in this? I assume the constitution has something to say about star chamber trials..

[–]Blackbeard6689 10 points11 points12 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

These new rules aren't for criminal trials they are trials made by the college where they worst they can do is expel people they find guilty.

[–]matrixislife 10 points11 points12 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah, I was wondering if the abrogation of someone's rights to that extent might be considered a criminal act. People pay to go to college, it has a huge effect on the rest of their lives, fucking with that must be considered at least theft.

[–]MRA_TitleIX 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

These new rules aren't for criminal trials they are trials made by the college

Except that they somewhat are rules for criminal trials. The tribunal is admissible in court. This is a pre-filter for court evidence that the accused can't challenge the bias of.

[–]odysseytree 21 points22 points23 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

By using this law, it gives you the power of praying mantis and terminate any man out of spite:

You can accuse him of sexual assault if:

  1. He refuses to have sex with you.

  2. He doesn't commit relationship to you.

  3. He rejects your proposal.

  4. He stops giving his attention to you after you reject his proposal.

The biggest one and extremely powerful.

  1. If you rape him when he's drunk and he files Title IX complaint, you can make a reverse accusation of rape by adding to your accusation that whatever he said, the inverse happened of what he said. This will not only dismiss his complaint but he will be also expelled for silencing you.

[–]NMBoavida 8 points9 points10 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Next it will be show trials and public shaming.

[–]airfox3522 29 points30 points31 points 3 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link

Fuck Biden! Vote him out!

[+]Stekkerbox -6 points-5 points-4 points 3 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

no

Lol getting down voted.

[–]Handle-me-timber 4 points5 points6 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Biden is the most man hating person in the history of the Oval Office, and that includes Kamala wrongfully sending men to jail for free labor.

[+]Blackbeard6689 -17 points-16 points-15 points 3 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

I would the Republicans have gone full fascist. They want the power to overturn elections and ban books, plus with their love of gender roles I don't think they'd be good for men's rights either (certainly not gay men).

[–]ChromeWeasel 4 points5 points6 points 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

You have no idea what a fascist is.

[–]Blackbeard6689 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

The people who hate democracy and want to maintain authoritarian grip on power while censoring books that go ahinst their ideology are fascists or close emough.

[–]ChromeWeasel 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

The banning books thing is just funny. No idea what you're referring to but considering what's been happening the past 2 years under democrats it's a laugable point to raise. Recently you've had democrats shutting people's businesses down, forcing untested vaccines into our bodies, censoring free speech, arresting their political opponents on fake charges, coordinating propoganda with the press and social media, destroying the value of our currency with out of control spending, and more.

The Repulicans have been out of power for 2 years and the country has gone through a major downturn in every measurable aspect possible. You can't possibly believe they are the party wronging you in any meaningful way.

[–]Blackbeard6689 -1 points0 points1 point 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2021%E2%80%932022_book_banning_in_the_United_States

The vaccines were not untested, what speech were they censoring

arresting their political opponents on fake charges,

[Citation needed]

coordinating propoganda with the press and social media,

[Citation needed]

destroying the value of our currency with out of control spending,

Inflation is hitting the entire world, its not just a US thing. Not like the GOP gives a flying fuck about fiscal responsibility. They only care about appeasing their rich donors.

The Repulicans have been out of power for 2 years and the country has gone through a major downturn in every measurable aspect possible.

And the GOP have done everything in their power to block and stall recovery. They had to be shamed into helping veterans with cancer for fucks sake.

[–]AdBeginning676 6 points7 points8 points 3 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

...Ima need ANY sources for that? Because the only "book banning" I've seen proposed is banning pornagraphy in public schools. And the LAST republican president was pro-gay marriage BEFORE winning (only one in history).

And I personally want that election investigated. Not overturned (if it was in fact legitimate), I simply have QUESTIONS and they (the NOT republicans) have refused to even allow others to find answers.

[–]Blackbeard6689 -5 points-4 points-3 points 3 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2021%E2%80%932022_book_banning_in_the_United_States

https://www-latimes-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.latimes.com/opinion/story/2022-06-27/book-bans-critical-race-theory-wisconsin

https://www.aclu.org/news/free-speech/bans-books-on-trial-for-obscenity

They aren't just banning porn and it isn't just from public schools. They're also trying to get books banned from public libraries and in Virginia they're trying to ban the books from being sold at all.

Also Trump promised to put up scotus judges that would overturn same sex marriage. And if you want to pretend the rest of the GOP is pro LGBT, then you're not fooling anyone.

There were tons of court cases over the stolen election, some presided by judges Trump appointed. They were given plenty of chances of to show evidence and they got bupkis. They also did audits that didn't find enough to overturn a single state let alone the election.

[–]WikiSummarizerBot 3 points4 points5 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

2021–2022 book banning in the United States

Between 2021 and 2022, there were a considerable number of books banned or challenged in the United States. Most of the targeted books have to do with race, gender, and sexuality. Unlike most book challenges in the past, whereby parents or other stakeholders in the community would engage teachers and school administrators in a debate over a title, local groups have received support from conservative advocacy organizations working to nationalize the efforts focused on certain subjects. They have also been more likely to involve legal and legislative measures rather than just conversations in local communities.

[ F.A.Q | Opt Out | Opt Out Of Subreddit | GitHub ] Downvote to remove | v1.5

[–]AdBeginning676 3 points4 points5 points 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Wait, so your only sources are all completely discredited, anti-Trump, pro-socialist propaganda outlets?

I mean, read what makes you feel better I guess but I don't trust heavily biased outlets of either side. I mean, i wouldn't source Steven Crowder (despite his history of accuracy and well vetted sourcing) specifically because of his biase. Tim Pool, Project Veritas, and other middle ground news outlets are a lot more reliable.

My own criticism of Trump was that the dude was an idiot that brought on staff that openly announced they would oppose him. As for Republicans in general, they're less of a political party and more of a speed bump for the insane Democrat policies we see today.

[–]Blackbeard6689 4 points5 points6 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

"Wait, so your only sources are all completely discredited, anti-Trump, pro-socialist propaganda outlets? "

"Anything that goes against my narrative is FAKE NEWS." Also these stories have nothing to do with Trump. And are you going to say every source cited in the Wikipedia article is biased?

I mean, i wouldn't source Steven Crowder (despite his history of accuracy and well vetted sourcing)

He cherry picks to find facts that "support" his pre determined conclusion.

Tim Pool, Project Veritas, and other middle ground news outlets are a lot more reliable.

Project Veritas is middle ground?

https://youtu.be/_n5E7feJHw0

They are a far right hack job that has been caught lying. They are as reliable as the national enquirer.

As for Republicans in general, they're less of a political party and more of a speed bump for the insane Democrat policies we see today.

Yeah insane policies like doing something about global warming, respecting free speech and a small amount of loan forgiveness.

[–]AdBeginning676 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Respecting free speech like claiming anyone that doesn't agree with them are extremists and terrorists?

The argument that Wikipedia is or isn't biased is hilarious in and of itself, so I'd like to just not dignify that with a legitimate response. The ACLU and the LA times?! You want to claim THESE sources haven't been caught publishing lies, openingly inciting violence against those of the "extremist" group, and are openly debunked on their "studies" on a regular basis?

As for global warming, it's a natural shift towards warmer temperatures (Or did you think the planet never went through a warm period after an ice age? Because there's been a couple of those... and we are exactly clear of the last one due to still having glaciers) that we may or may not have accelerated. But oddly enough, EVERY major political figure that argues we need to "do something" (which often involves endangering people's lives through exposure, starvation, and dehydration) owns beachfront property and fly in privately owned jets...

[–]Blackbeard6689 -2 points-1 points0 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Respecting free speech like claiming anyone that doesn't agree with them are extremists and terrorists?

That is not what they said, but they haven't done anything to criminalize any speech. They haven't tried to ban any books from schools or libraries (at least not nearly to the extent Republicans are) or make any anti protest laws to my knowledge.

And Wikipedia cites a lot of sources outside of the LA times and ACLU, go take a look. I haven't heard any of those wild claims about the LA times, no.

As for global warming, it's a natural shift towards warmer temperatures

It's man made. CO2 traps heat and we've been bumping billions of tons of it into the atmosphere for decades.

But oddly enough, EVERY major political figure that argues we need to "do something" (which often involves endangering people's lives through exposure, starvation, and dehydration) owns beachfront property and fly in privately owned jets...

This is just an ad hominid attack on them rather than refuting what they're saying.

Although all the major people saying we shouldn't do anything about it have ties to the oil industry.

[–]TAPriceCTR 3 points4 points5 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Biden was the point man for VAWA to supplant the FVPSA. What else would you expect?

[–]Woozuki 4 points5 points6 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Go MGTOW

[–]SirCha0s 4 points5 points6 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm actaully a pretty liberal person so I don't particularly care for the new Supreme Court but I hope they take on title IX because it's just blantantly unfair to the innocent and unconstitutional (or at least should be if it technically isn't.)

[–]No-Pepper-6241 4 points5 points6 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Time for more men to start (falsely or otherwise) accusing women of "sexual misconduct" and then MAYBE this will go away.

[–]nocivo 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

How is this constitutional? Just send this to the tribunal and they will crush it right away.

[–]Lui_Le_Diamond 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

They're spitting in the face of the Constitution now. Innocent until proven guilty. Period. This is blatantly against the Constitution and the US justice system.

[–]turedsandwhitch 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Make sure you vote for him again to lose what little rights you have left. Go socialism

[–]xdzgor 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

But why? Why not let the police and courts investigate and prosecute sexual assault?

[–]ALUCARD7729 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Holy hell, this is a whole new low

[–]FastFourierTerraform 6 points7 points8 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Tyrannical. Fuck every single person on this sub who voted for that withered old asshole. We told you this is exactly what would happen. But at least there won't be any mean tweets. And hey, a false SA conviction will probably at least keep you from being drafted to go die in Taiwan.

[–]SissyNikkDixxx 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

What can I do for u or be used by u

[–]Handle-me-timber 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This is it men. We now must bring millions of title ix claims against women, getting them all kicked out of university baselessly. That’s the only way to recover from such audacity.

[–]Training-Rich5057 -1 points0 points1 point 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Trade schools go to those and stay away from the insanity. Then make them pay dearly when you run your own business.

[+]GantMan -12 points-11 points-10 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This rolls back Trump admin changes. I don't know about you guys, but everything Trump's organization touched was trash. Restoring victim protections doesn't infringe on men's rights.

Also... stop saying there's an agenda. Don't be a comical snowflake.

[–]redHotChillyPapers51 points 3 years ago [recovered] (12 children) | Copy Link

If there's evidence against you, you're probably guilty anyway.

[–]The_Banana_Monk 57 points58 points59 points 3 years ago* (4 children) | Copy Link

I have evidence you raped a cow.

No I'm not gonna show it to you.

Edit: original comment said "if there is evidence against you then you're probably guilty"

"HEY in my defense you should have seen what she was wearing"

And something along the lines of "lives won't be ruined if guys don't booze up girls then rape them"

[–]EvidencePlz 5 points6 points7 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Well I believe all cows.

Your move!

[–]redHotChillyPapers51 points 3 years ago [recovered] (2 children) | Copy Link

In my defense, you should have seen what it was wearing.

[–]The_Banana_Monk 27 points28 points29 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Shit jokes won't help people who's livelihood is in danger from ass administration

[–]BlockBadger 41 points42 points43 points 3 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

14 hour old account… wow.

No comments other then this group… have a spine and troll with your main account.

[–]ilikeblackbooties 29 points30 points31 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

These one day old accounts who come to brigade are getting real tiresome.

[–]redHotChillyPapers51 points 3 years ago [recovered] (2 children) | Copy Link

My main account got banned from this sub for treating women with respect.

[–]BlockBadger 17 points18 points19 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Getting banned for being courteous?

Interesting, normally respectful comments get a lot of upvotes here.

EDIT: well a lot by our standards, we are very small.

[–]KissMyAsthma-99 12 points13 points14 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I don't know why it got banned, but I know it wasn't that.

[–]Fearless-File-3625 14 points15 points16 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I hope this is a joke.

[–]VerbotenVerb 8 points9 points10 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Ditto. Anyone able to find other sources?

[–]CorrectFrame3991 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I don’t like that at all.

[–]aigars2 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Why? Aren't we suppose to find out who's lying and who's not. Mind boggling.

[–]greyman0425 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Simple, when at college don't date, don't have sex. Get your degree and get out.

College is like work now, don't shit where you eat.

[–]SilentObserver1293 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The answer is self employment

[–]Competitive-Budget96 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

oh my god

[–]ZimbaZumba 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

"Whether someone is a 'victim' is a conclusion to be reached at the end
of a fair process, not an assumption to be made at the beginning," wrote
Judge F. Dennis Saylor IV of the U.S. District Court for the District
of Massachusetts in the 2016 case Doe v. Brandeis University.
"If a college student is to be marked for life as a sexual predator, it
is reasonable to require that he be provided a fair opportunity to
defend himself and an impartial arbiter to make that decision."

Wise words worth noting.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter