~ archived since 2018 ~
Popular
Other
listerstorm220
[–]human-potato_hybrid 162 points163 points164 points 3 years ago (21 children) | Copy Link
XYZ Elementary School is an equal opportunity employer! Our superintendent is male and males are particularly encouraged to apply! All efforts will be made to increase the number of male teachers in the school!
[–]throwawayddf 24 points25 points26 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
With us males are extra equal
[–]odysseytree 47 points48 points49 points 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
We will never hear this. A common pattern that I have seen is, gender quota is there where the air conditioner and adjustable chairs are and men are being discouraged to apply from air conditioned buildings.
[–]pdoherty972 3 points4 points5 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
And women are only interested in equal representation in high-paying fields. And sometimes not even there, if women already outnumber men in them (some medical fields).
[–]odysseytree 4 points5 points6 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
There are so many non air-conditioned jobs that are high paying. Only men work in them. It's more about air conditioning.
[–]ThrowAway640KB 5 points6 points7 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Or in other words, women’s “workplace successes” involve air-conditioned comfort and great lumbar support.
[–]DoomRabbitDaBunny 42 points43 points44 points 3 years ago (15 children) | Copy Link
I've started doing this when my wife starts in on this shit.
Plug in another group (gender, race, etc), repeat what you just said, and see how fucked up it sounds.
She usually huffs and walks away. Healthy relationship, let me tell you.
[–]MBV-09-C 32 points33 points34 points 3 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link
Sounds less like marriage and more like babysitting if I'm honest.
[–]DoomRabbitDaBunny 20 points21 points22 points 3 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link
You're not wrong.
And I'm stuck funding the bullshit and not getting laid either way.
[–]darkzoloto1 points 3 years ago [recovered] (9 children) | Copy Link
dude, it sounds like you just need to move out and move on at this point.
[–]DoomRabbitDaBunny 23 points24 points25 points 3 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link
I can see my kids every day and deal with it, or she can get majority custody and I fund her freedom and see my kids every 5th weekend and every other Christmas.
It's not about me at this point, man.
I know.you mean well, but I'm doing what's best for my relationship with my kids right now and simply recognizing who this woman really is.
[–]darkzoloto1 points 3 years ago [recovered] (3 children) | Copy Link
ah, didn't read anything about kids (probably missed it). sorry for that. Hope she doesn't fucking ruin them with her bullshit - or she falls down an open elevator shaft. Whichever.
[–]DoomRabbitDaBunny 17 points18 points19 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Hadn't mentioned yet, so it's all good.
Every day I have a choice. And so far, every day it's been worth staying to be present and be involved.
[–]aGuy55 5 points6 points7 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
THIS, I understand!!! It’s like looking at a mirror…
[–]TAPriceCTR 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Yeah, I got lucky... my ex wasn't feminist but she was so bad that had she not given up and fought for custody I could have sent her to jail.
[–]NullIsUndefined 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Yeah you are in too deep. You pretty much have to stay now, else get screwed in divorce.
Let this be a lesson to the next generation. What were the signs you should have noticed prior to getting wed?
[–]copeharderhun 3 points4 points5 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
What were the signs you should have noticed prior to getting wed?
This line of thinking is dangerous as you're implying that there are always signs and if you can identify those you can avoid this shit.
Truth is this shit can happen to any man at any point in time. Any woman can do this, even those who didn't display any "signs" or "red flags". Any man can fall victim to this
The only winning move is to not play. Never EVER get married. And if you do then it's your own fucking funeral.
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I'm right in that age range where any woman I meet is most likely going through "the change", if not already, soon. Before that I always felt dating was one sided and really not worth my effort compared to what I'd get out of the situation. Now? Every woman is a ticking time bomb (plus in my area they all look like thumbs and potatoes, going by every dating site I've tried)
Who wants to date a human blob who will freak out and ruin your life at any second? Unless you get insanely lucky, the whole game is just not worth it at all.
[–]Fu2-10 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
As sad and fucked up as it is, this is being a real man these days. Sometimes we just have to put the well being of our kids before our own happiness.
[–]copeharderhun 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Dude fucking leave her what are you doing. The financial hit will suck but better than a life like that.
Thanks for reminding me why I am never ever ever getting married
[–]Shadowkittenboy -1 points0 points1 point 3 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link
Sounds like youve subscribed to a toxic relationship where you go for 'gotcha' points instead of open communication
[–]DoomRabbitDaBunny 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Uh huh.
That's it, Freud.
[–][deleted] 211 points212 points213 points 3 years ago (23 children) | Copy Link
Why not just do it like this. Let's say we need 10 employees. There are 30 people want to join. Just get the 10 best independently from gender. If it depends on gender, that's discrimination.
[–]dekadoka 122 points123 points124 points 3 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link
Just don't mention race or gender anywhere on the application. Interview behind a voice filter if needed. Apparently feminists are against this only because the results are not what they want...
[–]Rixae 89 points90 points91 points 3 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link
Didn't they try having applications be completely anonymous because they swore discrimination, only to find out that even less women got hired when it was anonymous?
[–]LondonDude123 28 points29 points30 points 3 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link
Wasnt that in an orchestra or something?
[–]comment-stalker 44 points45 points46 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Orchestras and similar are very known for doing blind auditions. Even when I was in MIDDLE SCHOOL, our county honor band auditioned from around the corner of the listener to ensure no bias. Most of the listeners were directors at local schools so they were eliminating bias from teacher-student relationships I think, but I know high level symphonies do the same.
[–]CrowMagpie 14 points15 points16 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Wasn't that in an orchestra or something?
It was mentioned recently on this sub (the post called 100% Female Quota, or the article it links to) that it happened with the Australian government.
[–]fools_errand49 6 points7 points8 points 3 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
No. Orchestras were found to have more female hires when blind auditions were instituted and such procedures have been maintained. It's a different field (programming?) where they found blind hiring procedures reduced female hires and then removed the blind procedure. I'm a former classical orchestral musician.
[–]copeharderhun 3 points4 points5 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Strange isn't it. When blind procedures help women they keep em. When they don't they get rid of em.
Yet I'm supposed to believe we live in a patriarchy that massively helps men?
[–]bigez526 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago* (3 children) | Copy Link
It just goes to show, women naturally go towards the arts. Men naturally, S.T.E.M..
[–]copeharderhun 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Funnily enough even after the full blind auditions in orchestras men made up the majority lmao. Was something like 65-35 if I recall (maybe 60-40). Even with full blind auditions and complete equality in a field that women are more traditionally good at and more men succeed.
[–]fools_errand49 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Even with full blind auditions and complete equality in a field that women are more traditionally good at and more men succeed.
Well music is a super competitive field and men are a much higher variance population than women. I've met far more women who are interested in and good at poetry than men, and yet even here the all time great list while more gender equal than STEM fields is still disproportionately male.
[–]fools_errand49 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Music is a field that pulls on a collection of traits that seem to be pretty equally split between traditionally male and female domains of intelligence. It attracts a lot of somewhat androgynous types. My intelligence for example resides in the verbal domain where women normally excel.
[–]wineblood 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
They're not against it because it might not give the result they want, they're in favour of what's listed in the post so they can control the outcome.
[–]Billybob_78 49 points50 points51 points 3 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link
Because the 10 end up being white men
[–]dumwitxh 28 points29 points30 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
We can't do that, we need low performance women instead
[–]Amazing-Bit6140 42 points43 points44 points 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
And can’t have that! White men existing anywhere on their own is racist and sexist discrimination (somehow)
[–]beamoh91 points 3 years ago [recovered] (2 children) | Copy Link
Whats it called when you take an example of something, distort it extremely so its plainly inaccurate, and then embed that example into a narrative that victimizes you?
Asking for science.
[–]MBV-09-C 18 points19 points20 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Satire? Weird science project you got there.
[–]dependency_injector 12 points13 points14 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Of course, that's how being the best candidate works. Personality, education and experience don't matter, only sex and skin color.
/S
[+][deleted] -15 points-14 points-13 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
What does that have to do with race
[–]ThumpingBump 12 points13 points14 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Statistics, western world nations are predominantly white so most jobs are filled predominantly white.
[–]WholeMelodic 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Says billbob
[–]duhhhh 42 points43 points44 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Unfortunately, it is often how "equality" works today.
[–]Amazing-Bit6140 24 points25 points26 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Often? Real quality is considered oppression
Blind hiring practices didn’t give women the advantage they wanted, despite being equality.
Equality isn’t what they want. They want equality of outcome. They want to believe they did the same work to get something as a man, despite they not being true, and get the same results
[–]63daddy 63 points64 points65 points 3 years ago (15 children) | Copy Link
Very true. To claim equality while actively promoting women over men are opposing ideas and it’s hypocritical to claim equality while actively advantaging women.
[+]DamageController9 -49 points-48 points-47 points 3 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link
It didn't say they are promoting women over men. It said they encourage women to apply and that they're trying to find qualified women.
It doesn't say women will be chosen Ober men if they lack the qualifications required. That would be discrimination.
[–]63daddy 15 points16 points17 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
It said they especially encouraged women to apply. That is specifically promoting one sex over the other.
[–]odysseytree 32 points33 points34 points 3 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link
"All possible efforts will be made"
They are already biased to hire them. That's the only possible way.
Women already dominate in all universities so they already know better about themselves. Don't put them under children's category.
[+]DamageController9 -20 points-19 points-18 points 3 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link
They don't dominate computing though. Efforts to get more men in nursing would be welcomed in my books.
[–]odysseytree 12 points13 points14 points 3 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
Would be, Should be are just imaginations. That's not really happening while gender quota is not only happening but is also ubiquitous.
Why do you think it's necessary for women to dominate in all academic majors despite being the majority in academics? Don't they have free will?
Why it's necessary to only dominate in majors that have air conditioning?
[+]DamageController9 -15 points-14 points-13 points 3 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
So you're for encouraging men to get into nursing but feel it's discriminatory to encourage women to get into computing?
I'm for both Initiatives.
[–]LondonDude123 15 points16 points17 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Are you also FOR getting Women into logging, fishing, construction and trades, off shore oil rig maintenance???
[–]odysseytree 9 points10 points11 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
You are for both but guess which one is not happening and which one is practiced everywhere?
[–]MBV-09-C 6 points7 points8 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
You say you're for both, yet one's clearly not happening, but if we didn't point the discrimination is against men here, you wouldn't have shown up. True to your name at least.
[–]paranoiastreet 3 points4 points5 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
what about for prison and violence?
the people who get leadership positions are the top % of temperamental competitiveness, disagreeableness, and aggression; and 90% of them are male. it goes both ways.
men and women generally aren’t equally good at every job. the majority of women are temperamentally not a good fit for leadership positions or to do violent crime.
[–]Sensitive-Ad-8284 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
What are you talking about men are doctors and women are nurses. It’s called gender identities.
[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
They don't dominate computing though
The problem is the assumption that in perfect world without discrimination, that men and women would make up 50% of each profession.
The reality is that men and women have different interests and different skill levels, and we should expect to see gender differences in jobs.
[–]Whitified 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Women don't dominate workplace deaths too. Any plans?
[–]TheSnesLord 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Efforts to get more men in nursing would be welcomed in my books.
What a lazy tacked-on comment to make it appear as if you're for equality.
[–]Whitified 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
All possible efforts will be made to increase participation of Aryan race participants over Jewish ones.
It doesn't say Aryans will be chosen over Jews if they lack qualifications! That would be discrimination.
[–]BrainsBeforeBrawns[🍰] 32 points33 points34 points 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
If you want people of both sexes to join the workforce, don’t just promote it for one sex.
It’s like working out your biceps, but you only do one arm.
[–]kanike23 4 points5 points6 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Well it's a good way to deter talent away from your company. They will get what they want, but not for the reason they expect.
[–]DirtyPartyMan 8 points9 points10 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
We want a full body work out so we’ll focus solely on the arms, chest and shoulders
[–]BrainsBeforeBrawns[🍰] 5 points6 points7 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Covering all bases helps solve a lot of problems.
[–]Lasttoflinch 23 points24 points25 points 3 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
I have yet to see the reverse for fields over-represented by women.
[–]khaste 10 points11 points12 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
more male nurses when?
[–]MBV-09-C 10 points11 points12 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Male teachers too, the near total lack of male authority figures in school honestly made me feel completely uncomfortable talking to most of the adults about any problems I had with the other kids.
[–]TextDependent6779 6 points7 points8 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
same. so awkward to never have men to turn to. yet I bet some people would say we're misogynistic for feeling uncomfortable with opening up to women.
unfortunately, this'll take such an extraordinarily long tine to happen because society has done such a thorough job of making it seem like any and all men could potentially be pedophiles.
I agree. Next we will see men giving birth and men in the kitchen. Feminists want men to let go of their balls. That’s not equality.
[–]Tricky_Routine_7952 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
In the uk our nhs often run recruitment drives for male nurses to join the field.
https://www.campaignlive.co.uk/article/nhs-celebrates-male-nurses-mission-overcome-gender-divide/1661044#:~:text=NHS%20England%20has%20continued%20its,treating%20victims%20of%20street%20crime.
[–]Lasttoflinch 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Thanks, great to know. Do you also know if there's any male-specific scholarships in the UK for candidates in female-dominated studies such as nursing and early education education? I heard that female-specific scholarships (such as this) are rather common.
[–]airjordanjc12 16 points17 points18 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
If I saw that on a hiring page, I would immediately scratch that job off my list. I can just imagine how toxic that work environment would be for men, regardless of whether you know your trade or not. Preaching equality and promoting women over men are two ideas that cannot coexist.
Edit: fixed a typo
[–][deleted] 16 points17 points18 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Positive discrimination is still discrimination. Even if it wasn't, the feminists wouldn't allow men to get into female-dominated fields like veterinary medicine or teaching that easily. See here: https://www.smh.com.au/education/sydney-university-defends-new-scholarship-that-favours-men-as-consistent-with-diversity-20170208-gu84l6.html.
[–]TheSnesLord 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Well that was an infuriating read. Very blood-boiling to read about someone bitching about so-called "sexism against women" when it comes to male-only scholarships, but yet at the same time also opening admitting and making excuses for female-only scholarships.
I realize the article was 5 years ago, I'm guessing the male-only scholarship and it's creators and funders were cancelled soon afterwards.
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Probably, haven't checked on it
[–]OnThatSigmaGrindset 48 points49 points50 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
that's not equality, that's supremacy
[–]Fact_Trumps_Feeling 12 points13 points14 points 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Stupid people conflate Equality and Equity. That's like saying the United States' economy and the Soviet Union's economy had the same system. Sadly, there are a lot of stupid people.
[–]dekadoka 6 points7 points8 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Equal rights, equal treatment, equal opportunity. Not necessarily equal results if results depend on personal choice and skills. Why is this is controversial?
[–]anonymous037104 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Don't forget effort
[–]pdoherty972 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
You summed it up perfectly. Expecting identical outcomes from every gender, race/ethnicity is dumb. Preferences and affinity alone will account for differences, even in a perfect scenario of equal opportunity.
[–]TheSnesLord 18 points19 points20 points 3 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link
Can these f**kers be sued? I strongly encourage that men who have been the victim of their discrimination (and there will have been) to take legal action, perhaps even a class-action-lawsuit.
[–]AnxiousSon 11 points12 points13 points 3 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link
I heard about a few lawsuits against some big name universities in the States that were brewing for discrimination in their admitting procedures, particularly against Asian men.
Not sure about companies though.
[–]listerstorm220 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago* (11 children) | Copy Link
It's a Postdoc position at a Greek research center.
[+]foodfishsci -17 points-16 points-15 points 3 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link
Which put this in better context. First it's a country where English is a second language, so no need to get riled up about how's it's said. In US and Canada, it's outdated to state the gender of the employer. It's kind of a virtue signal rather than helpful, and more employers are moving toward a more nuanced language of gender/pronouns (Don't care how you feel about it, it's true). Second, certain academic fields, namely STEM, have wild under-representation of women. Why? Because of systemic bias towards women fulfilling traditional gender roles. Can men's rights movements coexist with the identification that there has been and continues to be systemic bias against women in many fields?
[–]TheSnesLord 13 points14 points15 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Second, certain academic fields, namely STEM, have wild under-representation of women. Why? Because of systemic bias towards women
The "under-representation of women" is down to women naturally going for other jobs of their own free will. There is no "systemic bias" against them, so you're talking utter horse s**t.
Yep - it's the typical "oh, look, there's a disparity - it must be the result of discrimination!"
[–]listerstorm220 7 points8 points9 points 3 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link
What about the bias towards female dominated fields such as philosophy, history, teaching, pre-school caregiving etc? Why don't we try and push more men towards these fields fulfilling traditional gender roles? Oh wait nobody cares because men=bad
[–]foodfishsci -3 points-2 points-1 points 3 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
I don't understand why you can't want both of those things.
[–]pdoherty972 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
Conveniently, it seems females only strive for equal (or better) representation in the high-income and high-status fields.
[–]foodfishsci -1 points0 points1 point 3 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
Consider this: if you were part of a marginalized group of people, who were previously excluded from "high-paying / high-status jobs" (post doc is not one of them), wouldn't you also try to climb the ladder for better pay and better life?
Do you expect women to be selfless and go for the low-paying back-breaking jobs, for the sake of equality? It's on them to pave their own way to equal representation in all fields? As a man you're not going to lift a finger to help make that happen?
How can you expect to have any women support men's rights movements if you attack them for wanting good things for themselves, too?
[–]pdoherty972 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago* (3 children) | Copy Link
It seems a a bit hypocritical, yes, for women to only care about equal (or more) women in only good-paying and high-status fields, while ignoring that men do almost all of the dangerous, dirty and low status/pay jobs.
And women aren’t downtrodden and never really have been. They’re already out-earning men in all the major cities and are graduating in higher numbers from college.
[–]foodfishsci 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
I came to this sub because apparently reddit algos thought I would be interested in it. Just reading these posts and responses just confirms that the online men's rights movement is a joke. If you can't recognize that women have been far behind men in voting rights, bodily autonomy, pay gaps, victims of violent crimes etc, then you're never going to convince anyone to give a shit about men's rights. Your movement is already built on shaky premise and if you think bashing women is the way to achieve anything... Well good luck.
[–]ReadingHunter 6 points7 points8 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Well looks like one of the important things we ignore that will bite us in the back later .Equality.History is going to have to repeat itself and we have to suffer a blow to wake up huh. Why not wake up now? A small problem ignored turns into a bigger and more troublesome problem.
[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
That should be the beginning of a lawsuit.
[–]GltyUntlPrvnInncnt 3 points4 points5 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Some people (women) are just more equal than others (men). Fuck feminism!
[–]Halafax 4 points5 points6 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
It's "feminist equality". Burdens and restrictions for men, choices and benefits for women.
[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Send both one with male name and other with female name with exact same resume and see who gets the reply :)
[–]dependency_injector 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
No one if both CVs get to the same HR
[–]DoctorStorm 6 points7 points8 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
You know what really pisses me off? I was raised by, and grew up with, women. And I mean thousands of them. I have so many sisters and daughters I look after, and the husbands of the families and I have this sort of nod that says, "yeah, nobody is going to fuck with our ladies. Nobody."
I end up owning a bunch of companies and forming a bunch of partnerships using my end as the technology provider for organizations, services, products, etc., in damn near every industry in existence.
We have paid internships, job opportunities and posting - all of the usual suspects.
Seeing as I basically grew up as one of the girls, I am blind to sexism and discrimination. I've seen what people can do, men and women alike, and know there are bad asses on both teams. I focus on the bad ass, not their gender.
BUT LOOK, I'm not trying to dissuade women from applying or submitting their resumes...they just don't.
By the numbers, they just don't show up in my countless stacks of resumes.
This kind of crap really boils my blood because they're pulling potential talent forcibly through a funnel. No one benefits from this. You end up with a team that is Captain Planet levels of "balanced", but it's a shit team because the concept of "can they do the job" gets thrown out the window.
To date I've only hired one, just one, woman. Indian. Crackpot senior developer. Absolutely amazing.
And I'm sorry but it's not because I'm a sexist employer, it's because the ladies aren't showing up or putting their chips on the table.
These posting need to say one thing and one thing only, "we are gender neutral, so men and women alike, ante the fuck up, we're looking for assassins and we don't care what's between their legs, only what's behind their eyes."
[–]twa8u 6 points7 points8 points 3 years ago* (3 children) | Copy Link
SEXISM Expressing preference for employment only for MALES would make the company cancelled & massive boycott.
Should be the same other way round
[–]alclarkey 4 points5 points6 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Along with investigated by every law enforcement agency with jurisdiction.
[–]twa8u 5 points6 points7 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
I wonder why we men dont GANG UP on men's issues just like women do.
Women share EVERYTHIGN happening in their life with their friends including all parts of their dating life. When they dont get what they want, they just throw the man under the bus destroying the very thing that ATTRACTED them to him : either money (thru alimony) or fame (as women are attracted to power and alpha males).
Me too movement is them doing the SAME thing that they did, just on a larger scale.
If men start TREATING women the same way they treat men, then sexism would get vanished within half a decade. We just need to TALK and CANCEL every round of sexism and abuse
Men, just share.
[–]twa8u 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I think it's CUTE, that women have feelings when men do the same thing they do after breaking up with a man https://www.reddit.com/r/AskWomen/comments/wnuijr/what_would_you_do_if_you_found_out_your_so_makes/
How's that offensive & when women would had done the same
[–]BlvckAnomally26 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
They never wanted equality
[–]tthechosendummy 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
No problem, just say in the application that you’re a woman. It’s 2022, they can’t actually dispute the claim
[–]Damienslair 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
So it isn’t an equal opportunity employer. Got it.
[–]Face_Puzzleheaded 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Bro.... The world of academia is wildly sexist. Most research groups have a quota for female students.
[–]hmm-3- 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
They want an equal number of men and women (preferably the majority being GiRlBoSSeS), not equality. Have these people been rejecting women this whole time or something? Let whoever wants to apply apply, and choose who has the best qualifications and merit. If the majority of either happen to be male, so be it. Not like you have an issue with the majority of construction workers being male. This is so stupid.
[–]Lars-h-pedersen 3 points4 points5 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
The biggest tech university in my country (DTU) hosts visitation days and whatnot for only females once a month to make it more equal, while men can only join once a year were the visitation is gender neutral. It’s such bullshit.
[–]traveller1976 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
And that's now the meritocracy, and civilization, dies
[–]WholeMelodic 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Law suit time?
[–]Heavy_Grand2526 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Don’t be afraid to call out things that claim to be in the name of equality, but in reality are anything but that. It is a wolf in sheeps clothing. Don’t let the wolf win. Be a lion, who tears off their mask and expose their farce for what it is.
[–]octalanax 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Job postings always used to say ( equal opportunity / affirmative action ) as if we were too stupid to realize that was a contradiction.
[–]mikesteane 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
All possible efforts will be made to increase participation of women researchers in the project.
What, even after they've been hired?
[–]RecoveringCoomer 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I have a feeling that I may have a better chance of getting a job there, if I simply identify as a woman...
[–]NullIsUndefined 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
From what I can tell this is how they remain legal. They never post a position saying "women only" or "people of color only". I stead it's always X is encouraged to apply.
But to treat any candidate different based on their sex or race is illegal in the US. This is part of the civil rights act.
So you can't outright say you are doing it.
[–]walkingaroundme1 points 3 years ago* [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link
I get discriminated against as a white male in the USA.
I’m an immigrant but that doesn’t seem to matter
[–]Mi-Infidel 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Truth. No one will believe you though.
[–]medscj 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
We should just say that we identify as woman in CVs.
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
It’s part of a social engineering scheme. Ok, here goes.
It all rests on this central assumption: Men and women are not only equal but the same. As in, identical. The only thing that makes us different is the way we’re socialised. No differences, there’s nothing in our biology that could affect our psychology. Nothing.
Once you understand this, everything else falls into place. We just need to get 50% of women into male-dominated workplaces (by the same token we should also be pushing as hard to get men into female-dominated spaces but good luck expecting logic) for an unspecified amount of time. By any means necessary. Quotas, preferential hiring, whatever. Just get the numbers!
After this unspecified amount of time, society will be changed, and there will be no need for this social engineering. We will be socialising men and women the same. Doubleplusgood.
Yes, some individual men will have their career prospects stymied, but (repeat after me) ‘men have had it their own way for years, now they can see what it feels like’. You can’t make an omelette without destroying the careers of a few eggs…
It’s a combination of vengeance (visited on those least responsible) and leftist social constructivism. It’s got more than a shade of Maoism about it.
[–]TAPriceCTR 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
The funny thing about equality is if you have to specify who gets it, it ain't equality.
[–]Aquariumpsychotic 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Honestly I’m a college student M and might just put down F on job applications and scholarships
[–]khaste 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
time to "change genders" since its apparently so easy to do and apply then?
[–]ReadingHunter 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Somebody also doesn't know what equality means.
[–]thegoodearthquake 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
We have had reservations in india around 70% of jobs, university seats, even housing. This shit will never stop if you’ll don’t start suing
[–]Anopanda1 points 3 years ago [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link
Thing is there is inherent bias that men are better than women when all things are equal. So when hiring people with identical skills, men are hired on the premise they are better.
To counter that bias, there is a focus that in those cases, women should be hired. If that happens enough, I think that bias will stop, or at least be less.
[–]Annual_Body_9931 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
That's not bias. And all things aren't equal. There are just many more men with the right qualifications in this and many other fields, thus finding a qualified woman is less likely. With this kind of strong preference for finding a woman for the job, it's likely they end up with a worse candidate. You shouldn't fight sexism with more sexism. Hiring should be based on qualifications and merit - not sex.
[–]NegativeEquivalent791 points 3 years ago [recovered] (3 children) | Copy Link
Honestly, speaking as a STEM major, just let them have this one.
[–]TheSnesLord 4 points5 points6 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
There's loads of misandrist policies like this. Let them have all of those too right? You're a f**king disgrace.
[–]pdoherty972 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Why would you let them preferentially discriminate based on gender? How is that "progress"?
[+]Halfcocked_Jack -21 points-20 points-19 points 3 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
Why not?
[–]pdoherty972 4 points5 points6 points 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Because they're suggesting gender and gender-based outcomes are somehow more important than equal opportunity.
[–]Halfcocked_Jack -1 points0 points1 point 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
How do you figure that? The law is that, all other things being equal, one is completely justified to try to hire people from categories that are underrepresented. And I’m pretty sure we are safe in saying this is the case here.
[–]pdoherty972 4 points5 points6 points 3 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link
Your reply doesn't even seem to relate to what I said.
And why are you "justified" in trying to hire people that are underrepresented? Why is that a problem that needs solving? If everyone has the same access to education and nobody is trying not to hire certain types of people, everything else is up to the individual to put forth the effort to acquire education/skills and apply for the jobs they'd like to have. A simple difference in numbers/percentages of applicants/hires/employees isn't itself an indication of discrimination.
[–]Halfcocked_Jack -1 points0 points1 point 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
According to the Supreme Court of the United States, because it is a positive good that the Republic’s elite institutions — in this case a university — reflect the Republic’s population, as long as that is not the only or overweening concern in selection.
Seems like a pretty good idea to me.
[–]thnxMrHofmann 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Lol so dumb. Add to the fact that most college students are now female too.
[–]dont_care_enough_ 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Idk what's going on but for some reason any post I click brings me to this one even if it's on a different subreddit
[–]Starwarsgreen 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Very tempted to start identifying as “women” when they ask
[–]Dirk_94 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Im germany the employers are forced to put this into their job offering if less than 50 %, employed are female.
Of course not regarding if for example there are less female engineers in general than male ones.
Guess i still havnt figured out how equality works /s
[–]Shadowkittenboy 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
When theres decades of history of nearly only men being in the field, then gatekeeping the industry by blocking any concern whatsoever of a toxic sexist environment in these companies, I can understand why a company would create this listing
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.created by /u/dream-hunter
[–]human-potato_hybrid 162 points163 points164 points (21 children) | Copy Link
[–]throwawayddf 24 points25 points26 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]odysseytree 47 points48 points49 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]pdoherty972 3 points4 points5 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]odysseytree 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]ThrowAway640KB 5 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]DoomRabbitDaBunny 42 points43 points44 points (15 children) | Copy Link
[–]MBV-09-C 32 points33 points34 points (11 children) | Copy Link
[–]DoomRabbitDaBunny 20 points21 points22 points (10 children) | Copy Link
[–]darkzoloto1 points [recovered] (9 children) | Copy Link
[–]DoomRabbitDaBunny 23 points24 points25 points (8 children) | Copy Link
[–]darkzoloto1 points [recovered] (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]DoomRabbitDaBunny 17 points18 points19 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]aGuy55 5 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]TAPriceCTR 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]NullIsUndefined 2 points3 points4 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]copeharderhun 3 points4 points5 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Fu2-10 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]copeharderhun 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Shadowkittenboy -1 points0 points1 point (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]DoomRabbitDaBunny 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 211 points212 points213 points (23 children) | Copy Link
[–]dekadoka 122 points123 points124 points (11 children) | Copy Link
[–]Rixae 89 points90 points91 points (9 children) | Copy Link
[–]LondonDude123 28 points29 points30 points (8 children) | Copy Link
[–]comment-stalker 44 points45 points46 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]CrowMagpie 14 points15 points16 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]fools_errand49 6 points7 points8 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]copeharderhun 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]bigez526 1 point2 points3 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]copeharderhun 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]fools_errand49 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]fools_errand49 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]wineblood 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Billybob_78 49 points50 points51 points (10 children) | Copy Link
[–]dumwitxh 28 points29 points30 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Amazing-Bit6140 42 points43 points44 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]beamoh91 points [recovered] (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]MBV-09-C 18 points19 points20 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]dependency_injector 12 points13 points14 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] -15 points-14 points-13 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]ThumpingBump 12 points13 points14 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]WholeMelodic 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]duhhhh 42 points43 points44 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Amazing-Bit6140 24 points25 points26 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]63daddy 63 points64 points65 points (15 children) | Copy Link
[+]DamageController9 -49 points-48 points-47 points (14 children) | Copy Link
[–]63daddy 15 points16 points17 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]odysseytree 32 points33 points34 points (11 children) | Copy Link
[+]DamageController9 -20 points-19 points-18 points (10 children) | Copy Link
[–]odysseytree 12 points13 points14 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[+]DamageController9 -15 points-14 points-13 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]LondonDude123 15 points16 points17 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]odysseytree 9 points10 points11 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]MBV-09-C 6 points7 points8 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]paranoiastreet 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Sensitive-Ad-8284 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Whitified 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]TheSnesLord 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Whitified 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]BrainsBeforeBrawns[🍰] 32 points33 points34 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]kanike23 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]DirtyPartyMan 8 points9 points10 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]BrainsBeforeBrawns[🍰] 5 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Lasttoflinch 23 points24 points25 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]khaste 10 points11 points12 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]MBV-09-C 10 points11 points12 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]TextDependent6779 6 points7 points8 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Sensitive-Ad-8284 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Tricky_Routine_7952 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Lasttoflinch 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]airjordanjc12 16 points17 points18 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 16 points17 points18 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]TheSnesLord 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]OnThatSigmaGrindset 48 points49 points50 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Fact_Trumps_Feeling 12 points13 points14 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]dekadoka 6 points7 points8 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]anonymous037104 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]pdoherty972 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]TheSnesLord 18 points19 points20 points (13 children) | Copy Link
[–]AnxiousSon 11 points12 points13 points (12 children) | Copy Link
[–]listerstorm220 2 points3 points4 points (11 children) | Copy Link
[+]foodfishsci -17 points-16 points-15 points (10 children) | Copy Link
[–]TheSnesLord 13 points14 points15 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]pdoherty972 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]listerstorm220 7 points8 points9 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–]foodfishsci -3 points-2 points-1 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]pdoherty972 1 point2 points3 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]foodfishsci -1 points0 points1 point (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]pdoherty972 2 points3 points4 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]foodfishsci 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]ReadingHunter 6 points7 points8 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]GltyUntlPrvnInncnt 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Halafax 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]dependency_injector 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]DoctorStorm 6 points7 points8 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]twa8u 6 points7 points8 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]alclarkey 4 points5 points6 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]twa8u 5 points6 points7 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]twa8u 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]BlvckAnomally26 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]tthechosendummy 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Damienslair 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Face_Puzzleheaded 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]hmm-3- 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Lars-h-pedersen 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]traveller1976 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]WholeMelodic 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Heavy_Grand2526 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]octalanax 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]mikesteane 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]RecoveringCoomer 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]NullIsUndefined 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]walkingaroundme1 points [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Mi-Infidel 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]medscj 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]TAPriceCTR 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Aquariumpsychotic 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]khaste 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]ReadingHunter 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]thegoodearthquake 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Anopanda1 points [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Annual_Body_9931 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]NegativeEquivalent791 points [recovered] (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]TheSnesLord 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]pdoherty972 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[+]Halfcocked_Jack -21 points-20 points-19 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]pdoherty972 4 points5 points6 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]Halfcocked_Jack -1 points0 points1 point (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]pdoherty972 4 points5 points6 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Halfcocked_Jack -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]thnxMrHofmann 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]dont_care_enough_ 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Starwarsgreen 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Dirk_94 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Shadowkittenboy 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link