TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

      • /r/AllPillDebate
      • /r/AlreadyRed
      • /r/altTRP
      • /r/AntiFeminists
      • /r/askFDS
      • /r/askMRP
      • /r/askRPC
      • /r/becomeaman
      • /r/BlackPillScience
      • /r/Chadfish
      • /r/Divorce_Men
      • /r/EverydayMisandry
      • /r/ExRedPill
      • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
      • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
      • /r/GEOTRP
      • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
      • /r/MalePsychology
      • /r/Male_Studies
      • /r/MenSupportMen
      • /r/MGTOW2
      • /r/MuslimRedPill
      • /r/newTRP
      • /r/PussyPass
      • /r/PussyPassDenied
      • /r/RedPillBooks
      • /r/RedPillParenting
      • /r/RedPillWives
      • /r/RedPillWomen
      • /r/RedPillWorkplace
      • /r/RPChristians
      • /r/seduction
      • /r/ThankTRP
      • /r/TheRedPillStories
      • /r/trpGAME
      • /r/TRPOffTopic
      • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
      • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

      • Artful Prudence
      • A Voice for Men
      • Alpha Game
      • Black Label Logic
      • Caleb Jones
      • Captain Capitalism
      • Corporate Machiavelli
      • Days of Game
      • Deep Strength
      • Dicipres
      • Donal Graeme
      • Female Misogynist
      • Free Northerner
      • Gaming My Wife
      • Good Looking Loser
      • Hawaiian Libertarian
      • In Mala Fide
      • KillToParty
      • Kill Your Inner Loser
      • Krauser PUA
      • LaidNYC
      • Married Man Sex Life
      • NO MA'AM
      • Omega Virgin Revolt
      • Pook's Mill
      • Random Xpat Rantings
      • Red Pill Theory
      • Red Pill Wifery
      • RedPillDad
      • RedPillDoctor
      • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
      • Sigma Frame
      • The Feminine Woman
      • The Futurist
      • The Masculine Principle
      • The Modern Man
      • The New Modern Man
      • The Obsidian Files
      • The Power Moves
      • The Private Man
      • The Red Pill Room
      • The Red Quest
      • The Rules Revisited
      • The Spearhead
      • Troy Francis
      • Wintery Knight
      • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

Everything else being equal, why does being a physician offer such a huge advantage for male doctors in terms of attracting interest, ease of dating, quality/quantity of relationships, etc... yet being a female physician seems to work against her in the exact dating/relationship worlds?

Archibald_Andino

December 12, 2016
10 upvotes
/r/PurplePillDebate
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title Everything else being equal, why does being a physician offer such a huge advantage for male doctors in terms of attracting interest, ease of dating, quality/quantity of relationships, etc... yet being a female physician seems to work against her in the exact dating/relationship worlds?
Author

Archibald_Andino

Upvotes 10
Comments 212
Date December 12, 2016 12:44 AM UTC
(9 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/PurplePillDebate
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/5htkes/everything_else_being_equal_why_does_being_a/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/PurplePillDebate/everything-else-being-equal-why-does-being-a.271318
https://theredarchive.com/post/271318
Top posts by Archibald_Andino

A male professor said this women-only study lounge is sexist and illegal. The school shut it down

3891 upvotes
August 1, 2016
/r/MensRights

"There was pressure on her instructors to help her to pass the course. I think the RAF wanted good PR out of it.’ First female UK combat soldier quits in week 2 of 18 week training program

620 upvotes
May 29, 2018
/r/PussyPassDenied

Do Women Prefer Female Bosses? Study: "female job satisfaction is lower under female supervision. Male job satisfaction is unaffected by the gender of the boss." #notoppressingme

456 upvotes
September 21, 2016
/r/MensRights

I'm All For Feminism, But It's Kinda Making It Harder To Date

435 upvotes
January 19, 2019
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen

Public university in Canada decides to give a pay raise to each and every female professor, regardless if they were already paid the same as their male counterparts and have been paid equally from their hire date... because, vagina.

324 upvotes
December 26, 2017
/r/PussyPass

Study Finds No Gender Gap in Tech Salaries

315 upvotes
March 2, 2016
/r/MensRights

Women avoids jail time with 'suspended sentence' after revenge porn conviction where she created fake gay dating profiles using his explicit photos with his full name and address, she also threatened to burn down his house, he was forced to quit his job due to non-stop harassment.

281 upvotes
April 9, 2016
/r/PussyPass

Husband and wife both convicted on identical charges for the same crime... he serves 31% longer jail term

195 upvotes
February 13, 2016
/r/PussyPass

Comments

[–]Jewdius_Maximus38 points39 points40 points 9 years ago (103 children) | Copy Link

Because men don't care about a woman's profession nearly as much as women care about a man's. Socially speaking, a man's self worth and his worth as perceived by others correlates very highly with his type of employment or lack there of. If a man is a physician, it means he is smart, likely has a stable and ample income, is together, is motivated, and generally has his head in the right place (not to say there aren't some lemons out there who are physicians). A woman's worth is generally not defined in society by how prestigious her employment is.

[–]JaggedYellowPillyellow is the opposite of purple23 points24 points25 points 9 years ago* (59 children) | Copy Link

I would take this a step farther. Many men actively avoid dating women who make more money than them or are otherwise perceived as more successful than them, smarter than them, etc.

Example 1: I was raised in a household where my mom was more educated than my dad and earned a lot more money. He was ok with it, but he also caught a lot of shit about it from his buddies. He tried not to let it get to him, but I could tell it did sometimes.

Example 2: I work for a company that has a lot of very highly educated women, and while many of them are married, a disproportionate number of them are single despite wanting to be 'shipped. I've heard quite a few stories from them about men who couldn't handle making less money and being less educated.

We men are proud and our egos are fragile.

[–][deleted] 8 points9 points10 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

We men are proud and our egos are fragile.

Please. Cinderella's crsytal shoe is more durable than my ego lolol.

[–]questioningwomandetached from society3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago* (38 children) | Copy Link

Why do most men pretend to be more independent of group mentality if they stop being attracted to a woman because of what their friends say? That's why it's better to date a loner or introvert. Less herd minded. I care about education more than money though. A poor phD is a better pick than a millionaire without college for me. If you stop being attracted to someone just because of what someone else has said, you've been oversocialized. Oversocialization is a disease that's destroying the world.

[–]JaggedYellowPillyellow is the opposite of purple7 points8 points9 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

I'm not trying to justify shitty behavior, but there are benefits to being a part of a close-knit friends group. The trade-off is you have to put up with the herd mentality.

[–]cxj75% Redpill Core Ideas8 points9 points10 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

100% this, especially for low class men with poor prospects otherwise.

[–]questioningwomandetached from society3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

If someone constantly insults your spouse, they aren't the type of people to help you no matter what.

[–]mrcs84usnFatty Fat Neck Beard4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If your friends as a collective talk poorly about your spouse, chances are that there's something wrong with your spouse that you just don't see.

[–][deleted] 8 points9 points10 points 9 years ago (18 children) | Copy Link

It sounds like you're the one that is brainwashed.

Why would a poor PhD be a better pick than a millionaire who is not traditionally educated?

The poor PhD has an obviously useless piece of paper and probably spent a lot of time in college learning nothing of value, while the millionaire may be self taught and obviously provides a lot of value to a lot of people.

For the record, I'm a highly educated health care provider that is also in the early phase of entrepreneurship. From knowing both highly educated professionals and non-traditionally educated entrepreneurs, I can honestly say that the entrepreneurs tend to be more intelligent, more street smart, and less inclined to participate in group think.

[–]questioningwomandetached from society3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago* (17 children) | Copy Link

Well for one the PhD would probably be more educated on things and more open minded. They also would have read so many textbooks they're beaming with conversation. It's impressive if someone has an extensive textbook knowledge of anything, knows how to analyze it and is well spoken. They can teach you all about history, economics, literature, philosophy, whatever their subjects the studied. Also he'd have more time to study all of that and build an extreme amount of knowledge. Even if it's on a "useless" topic it's impressive to me and makes for hours of nice conversation. I like it when someone can dissect a topic and relate it to other things too. Like someone discussing ancient dead languages would fascinate me. They'd also have a better grasp of things than the average person because they've read so much and have so much information in their head.

You say you don't participate in group think but you want to force me to. You want to force me not to go for my dreams because it bothers you that I'm on an "equal standing"

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points9 points 9 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link

"You dropped 150 grand on a fuckin' education you could have got for a dollar fifty in late charges at the public library!" - Good Will Hunting

Knowledge and information are free and do not require a degree. A degree is only useful if it opens doors.

And, yes, I don't participate in group think. If I did, I'd be a raging feminist and would believe in "equal rights"....because that's the nonsense that's being shoved down my throat from every direction. That's the opinion of the majority in the US.

[–]questioningwomandetached from society5 points6 points7 points 9 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

What rights do you want to take away? If you want to take away my dreams, arguably you want to force me into your group think paradigm. I don't care what the majority says so I'm not a group thinker. The majority is not the decider of what's right.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

From what I've seen, the family unit works the best when the man is working and the woman is at home with the kids.

I'd like to bring it back to the early days of not worrying about losing my shirt in divorce and being able to discipline children.

[–]questioningwomandetached from society3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago* (6 children) | Copy Link

In the real world, there's costs like college or healthcare to consider. What if someone doesn't fit their gender roles or someone's situation is different? What if someone wants to marry for passion and not for money?

I mean there are so many variables. What would you say to the people who's dreams or realities don't align with that? I don't want to go to a day where my dreams and visions are blocked just because of my gender and I'm considered worthless if I don't meet some arbitrary standard. What happens if a woman is better at STEM than a typical female task? What then? I value freedom and possibility over order and probability so maybe that's why we don't see eye to eye. To be honest, if someone will resent me for going for my dreams, I'm not stopping just because of their feelings.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

I never said that you're worthless. I just said that society would be better served if the male-female dynamic returned to what it was in the past.

In addition, I would be much better off if this occurred, being that I'm male. So I'm in favor of it. You would not be better off so you're not in favor of it.

Not that it matters anyway because things won't go back that way for a long time if ever. Other countries do have that though, which is why I aspire to reside there.

[–]questioningwomandetached from society1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Knowledge is free but a degree shows they are dedicated to a specific type of knowledge. I would be impressed though if someone gathered that much knowledge from a library too.

and how is it useless if someone gains wisdom or learns more? What about creative intelligence or things intrinsically of value? The so-called crazy person on the street could write deep poetry or have perspectives on the world you'd never know about. Knowledge that could help you or many other people.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Because they're going into hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of debt to go to college for degrees that won't allow them to pay that money back. Unless they are learning a trade, college is a poor economic investment.

And, as a person with a masters degree from a well-respected, science-based school, I can certainly tell you that I did not learn unbiased information in my classes. They teach you about their beliefs. It doesn't necessarily mean that you're learning.

These days, I enjoy the fruits of my good economic decisions while embarking on knowledge on my own terms. I am very interested in politics and American military history (among other things) and can have very in-depth conversations about it. I also taught myself the stock market (including stock options). And I'm currently taking a $20 writing course on Udemy to learn better writing and sales/persuasion skills.

I agree that knowledge is a great thing and worth pursuing. I disagree that this should (or even can) be done at the university level.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Agreed 100% with everything you're saying about university. For the vast majority of people it is a complete waste of time and money. And anyone with genuine drive and intelligence does not need it.

There's a reason so many CEOs and other highly successful and rich individuals either never went or dropped out, especially self-made entrepreneurs.

You should read into Felix Dennis if you haven't already. As both an entrepreneur and an RPer you'd love the guy. He is the origin of the oft-quoted "if it flies, floats, or fornicates, always rent it - it's cheaper in the long run." This bloke went from poverty to being worth £500m then essentially instead of getting married he did a load of coke while banging a load of hookers.

[–]obstinatebeagle0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

a degree shows they are dedicated to a specific type of knowledge

Not really. I've interviewed heaps of job applicants - all with degrees and jobs mind you - who can't answer the most basic technical questions that I would expect of a competent student who has passed first year. Degrees aren't a great indicator of anything these days I'm afraid.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Well for one the PhD would probably be more educated on things and more open minded.

They are more academic educated in one specific area of study. They are not more educated on more things. Meaning if they have a PhD in say women's studies they are going to have next to zero knowledge or education on economics or any education/knowledge of say physics or chemistry.

They also would have read so many textbooks they're beaming with conversation.

How is reading so many textbooks makes one beaming with conversation? I can be more beaming with conversation by reading the news and/or articles online. Hell I can make for better conversation by reading The New Yorker. Or that reading some book.

Also he'd have more time to study all of that and build an extreme amount of knowledge.

Despite his knowledge would be narrow in scope. Meaning you have hours to listen to their knowledge on one single field of study. How exactly is that awesome? That is a total bore and you will get tied of it soon.

They'd also have a better grasp of things than the average person because they've read so much and have so much information in their head.

Zero guarantee of that actually.

[–]obstinatebeagle0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

Meaning if they have a PhD in say women's studies they are going to have next to zero knowledge or education on economics or any education/knowledge of say physics or chemistry.

This is true. It's how we get misleading and misinformed rubbish like the wage gap or 1 in 4 sexual assault in college.

Edit: what economics and physics has to with this is a basic understanding of statistics, which are sorely lacking the examples I posted.

[–]obstinatebeagle0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Well for one the PhD would probably be more educated on things and more open minded.

Speaking as someone who actually has a PhD, this is not true at all. Have you not heard of the politically correct groupthink censorship that has swept over universities and colleges across the western world right now? Those academics are being as closed minded as they possibly can be. Jonathan Haidt has a lot to say about that actually - you'd like him - he too has a PhD.

They can teach you all about history, economics, literature, philosophy, whatever their subjects the studied. Also he'd have more time to study all of that and build an extreme amount of knowledge. Even if it's on a "useless" topic it's impressive to me and makes for hours of nice conversation.

Have you actually done this? Had hours of nice conversation about their field I mean? It's easy enough for someone to give you a nice easy introduction to their field in 30 mins at a party or over a dinner table, but how many times do you think you can have that same conversation if you don't actually understand their field? I mean, to actually understand the field to the degree that you can make meaningful conversation about it for year after year makes you their colleague.

And I find entrepreneurs to be far more sociable and gregarious than academics generally, and hence often make better conversation.

[–]GoldPisseR0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link

If the phd one is poor than he is a failure.

Because high education usually corresponds to easy stable money.

[–]questioningwomandetached from society1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago* (12 children) | Copy Link

Not in the new economy. Also failure is a strong word. is he truly failed if he has wisdom that many people don't?

[–]GoldPisseR1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Academic wisdom if not transitioned into financial success is the most useless wisdom to possess.

You invest your prime time and money to secure your future more than to 'gain knowledge'.

I value education too, but only because its the gateway to wealth.

[–]HigHog1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

[deleted]

What is this?

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Disagree. You can't go to academia very far like become a professor without a PhD. And those usually make very little money compared to others.

But that's the economy that sucks and doesn't pay a lot to scientists, teachers etc.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

What new economy? And what good does wisdom do for you when your poor?

[–]questioningwomandetached from society1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

Some things are intrinsically worth something on their own.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

How is being poor but educated is worth more than not educated and rich?

[–]questioningwomandetached from society1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

I'm not saying that. I'm saying some things have value other than money or the value others assign.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

is he truly failed if he has wisdom that many people don't?

[–]MorpheusGodOfDreamsCaught Red Handed0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If you stop being attracted to someone just because of what someone else has said, you've been oversocialized.

a man will say what needs to be said, but he is still attracted. Boner test never lies.

[–]ScarletNumbers4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (16 children) | Copy Link

Men actively avoid dating women who make more money than them or are otherwise perceived as more successful than them, smarter than them, etc.

I don't think this is true. I think it is more than women feel entitled to a man who is more successful than they are.

[–]JaggedYellowPillyellow is the opposite of purple6 points7 points8 points 9 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Ok. What's your reasoning for believing that?

[–]ScarletNumbers4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Human history

[–]JaggedYellowPillyellow is the opposite of purple11 points12 points13 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Human history includes thousands of generations of men who are accustomed to having higher status than the women they partner with. History is just as likely to be a factor in men avoiding high-status women as in women seeking high-status men.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Probably a bit of both tbh.

[–]exit_sandmanstill not the MGTOW sandman FFS1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

For your reading pleasure.

The general problem with assessing these mentalities is that you should take into account whom you're looking at; and whether their statement is self-serving or not.

Are you asking the high-earning women? If they say something that makes men look bad and themselves look good, take it with a grain of salt - in that vein, for them it's easier to place the blame on men and say "they are just intimidated by me earning a lot of money/they want a young, impressionable woman who looks up to them because they can't deal with a strong woman [like myself]" instead of admitting "maybe I am not hot stuff anymore and should aim lower".

[–]dragoness_leclerq🚑 Vagina Red Cross 🚑2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

I don't think this is true. I think it is more than women feel entitled to a man who is more successful than they are.

What are you basing this on?

[–]Ultramegasaurus1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

http://news.ubc.ca/2016/10/28/marrying-up-despite-more-education-women-still-choose-husbands-with-higher-incomes/

http://ideas.time.com/2012/03/15/why-men-are-attracted-to-high-earning-women/

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1345520/What-women-REALLY-want-To-marry-rich-man-stay-home-children.html

http://www.smh.com.au/lifestyle/life/family-relationships-and-sex/men-want-beauty-women-want-money-what-people-want-in-a-sexual-partner-20151001-gjyyot.html

[–]dragoness_leclerq🚑 Vagina Red Cross 🚑1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

None of those articles demonstrated that men were eager to date higher earning women so I don't get your point.

[–]exit_sandmanstill not the MGTOW sandman FFS2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Who says men are eager to date higher earning women? The point is that such an arragement rarely ever offers itself because women themselves refuse to consider it in he first place.

[–]dragoness_leclerq🚑 Vagina Red Cross 🚑2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

No, actually the point was that men don't really like dating women who earn more than them.

[–]exit_sandmanstill not the MGTOW sandman FFS2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Hey, women are the selectors by default. If the high-earning ones already screen out the vast majority of men on a financial basis alone, it's a bit problematic to place the blame for their lacking dating prospect on men first and most, dontcha think?

[–]dragoness_leclerq🚑 Vagina Red Cross 🚑1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

it's a bit problematic to place the blame for their lacking dating prospect on men first and most, dontcha think?

I didn't 'place the blame' on anyone though.

[–]fuxdpus1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Men don't care much, in general. Women exclude the poorer men. Basically I wouldn't mind dating a hot rich young woman who was nice to me. But I'd be just as happy with a poor hot young woman who was nice to me. Considering hypergamy, the latter is more likely to happen in real life.

[–]obstinatebeagle0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

QFT

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Many men actively avoid dating women who make more money than them or are otherwise perceived as more successful than them, smarter than them, etc.

Most women actively avoid dating men who make less money than them or are otherwise perceived as less successful, smarter, etc etc.

[–]Archibald_Andino[S] 5 points6 points7 points 9 years ago (28 children) | Copy Link

But why do so many female physicians struggle with dating?

[–]Jewdius_Maximus9 points10 points11 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Well I'm not a psychologist or anything, but I do have several uncles/aunts who are doctors. Being a physician is a VERY time consuming endeavor. Between med school, residency, and running your own practice or working in one, you generally don't have much free time. And in my honest opinion, women are a lot more willing to put up with an absentee significant other if it means money and status. In general, men don't want to be a stay at home boyfriend/husband while their wife is out being a workaholic and raking in money. Many men would find that emasculating.

[–]Nagicman10 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Not true at all, there are many guys who would put up with that, the women just have high standards

[–][deleted] 16 points17 points18 points 9 years ago (18 children) | Copy Link

Hypergamy 101. Female physicians aren't going to be satisfied with Brandon shilling used cars or Matthew working in low level insurance. Women date up. And when you're at the top of the earning ladder there isn't much to move up to, and the few men that are above them are in fierce demand. High value men also aren't going to seek out women in prestigious jobs either.

[–]Taylor1391Rational woman6 points7 points8 points 9 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link

Why wouldn't high value men seek out equally high value women? Doesn't the "marketplace" we talk about around here basically guarantee that they would do that?

[–]cxj75% Redpill Core Ideas11 points12 points13 points 9 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

Because men and women value different things. High value woman = young, hot, agreeable, sexually enthusiastic. High education or earning are not part of it.

For the record I work in healthcare and most physicians seem to marry each other.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

most physicians seem to marry each other.

Doesn't that defeat your own argument then? Why aren't the male docs marrying models with all their money and status, surely according to TRP this is what men in their position should do?

[–]cxj75% Redpill Core Ideas1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

They do have money and status but not time to meet models who are out of their social circle. Hot people within the medical field sure. But most people especially nurses detest physician culture which grows more and more alienating so they're stuck with each other.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

So what you're saying is people just pair up within their own social circles without some grand strategy behind it? I agree.

[–]cxj75% Redpill Core Ideas0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

sigh

[–]Nagicman10 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Doctors like that can't get models, you need to be a musician or actor or something, doctors dont have that much status lol, and doctors do date up or of they're smart and want to be happy they marry their looks match, they will date better looking doctors

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

doctors dont have that much status lol

What world do you live in like really?

But even if I were to agree for the sake of discussion, why are they not dating 20 year old shop assistants? Surely according to TRP this is what should be happening?

[–]Nagicman11 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Doctors are not in the same league as CEOs, musicians, male models, and actors. That doesn't mean they have no status , just not as much as famous people, also looks still matter status can just help you date out of your league. And it's rare for a male doctor to date down in looks

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

What is it with you people and your fetish for male models lmao.

Answer my question though. Doctors still have money and status even if it's not to the same level as a CEO. So why are they not dating hot 20 year olds instead of pairing off with other doctors their age?

[–]the_calibre_cat1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Because hypergamy, men are instinctively aware of it and are off-put by successful women at a core level. Ever heard the phrase, "She's out of your league?" I'd fuck a hot doctor for the fun of it, but unless I was shit-hot and pulling in a decent chunk of change on my own, I wouldn't be trying to LTR her and if she was sending signals of that sort I'd be extremely skeptical.

I don't see those sorts of relationships lasting. I've seen relationships with a smaller power differential between woman and man evaporate as she got "bored" and tired of him.

[–]Blaat19851 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Income and employment level has little influence on a womans social market value in the eyes of man. It might actually make her less appealing.

[–]Nagicman10 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Men don't care about status the same way women do, they only care about looks and personality.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Why are A-List Hollywood actors married to equally famous, rich, and powerful women..?

[–]MorpheusGodOfDreamsCaught Red Handed1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

yeah, those long lasting, stable marriages to celebrities. like Hugh Jackman! oh wait...

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Samuel Jackson, Pierce Brosnen, sting, Bon Jovi etc... Are they all gay? lmaOoo

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I know plenty of female physicians through my career. I don't know any that have ever struggled with dating.

[–][deleted] 1 points1 points1 points 9 years ago | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]Yezdigerd1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Not my impression, I can't recall I ever seen a fat female med student and they are decidedly above average in looks. They tend to be consumed by the profession though and not the type who spend much time in front of a mirror.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Besides the medical field female dominate and such she have issues dating in her field, you have the whole hypergamy thing. You also have a woman in a field that pays quiet well and such she isn't going to be dating a guy that even makes 50k.

[–]5th_Law_of_Robotics0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'd guess because they generally don't want to date anyone of a lower status than they are.

So they're competing for a much narrower slice of the dating pool (men earning at least as much as them) and that dating pool has no such restrictions so it's them versus pretty much all women for a handful of men.

If they'd be willing to date down and go out with a janitor that would fix this. But this just doesn't happen much.

[–][deleted] -3 points-2 points-1 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

because they are ugly or fat

[–]dakruNeither3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If a man is a physician, it means he is smart, likely has a stable and ample income, is together, is motivated, and generally has his head in the right place (not to say there aren't some lemons out there who are physicians).

There's also that being a physician is a high status, respected job.

[–]Merger-ArbitrageTriggermaster, Non-Pill, Cutting through the crap...1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

A woman's worth is generally not defined in society by how prestigious her employment is.

I think this is some cross-socioeconomic-class misunderstanding - for lack of a better way to put it.

UMC/UC associated women are definitely going to be judged by their profession to some degree. A woman doctor married to a UMC/UC guy will be seen as "being in the right place" while a woman barista married to a UMC/UC guy will be seen as "using other means to get by."

[–]questioningwomandetached from society0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

Self worth and worth perceived by others aren't always the same. I do things for my own self esteem, not for others.

[–]KrispyMcSockingtonPillar of the community4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Self worth and worth perceived by others aren't always the same. I do things for my own self esteem, not for others.

Yes but OP's point was about doctors and dating. She may be a physician or do things for herself but it will not necessarily translate into a great dating prospect. Every time women climb the career ladder they A. Raise theor standards for potential mates and B. Have to sacrifice something in the process. This sacrifice is something all people do if they choose to chase careers. The difference is, it doesn't hurt a man's prospects because he doesn't care if she is a doctor or the secretary. He doesn't exclude women based solely on their careers. She does and so therefore shrinks her dating pool.

[–]questioningwomandetached from society0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

That's only if she excludes guys for careers. If she doesn't then the barrier is imaginary and self imposed.

[–]MorpheusGodOfDreamsCaught Red Handed2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

That's only if she excludes guys for careers. If she doesn't then the barrier is imaginary and self imposed.

so not at all imaginary, even if it is self imposed.

[–]questioningwomandetached from society2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

If you're in a box you can easily get out of yet you think you can't get out of the box, the extreme barrier is in your imagination.

[–]MorpheusGodOfDreamsCaught Red Handed1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

but this is not easy, since it exists far deeper than her imagination. Its not just something that can be exchanged for a different perspective, it is hardwired.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

3deep5me

[–]Jewdius_Maximus1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The self worth bit was really just an aside and not overly relevant to the question asked.

[–]Archibald_Andino[S] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Yes but in theory, a female physician would earn such a sizable income, more than enough to easily cover the entire household, so much so, that the man's income (or lack thereof) becomes a nonissue, right?

[–]Jewdius_Maximus5 points6 points7 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

That is generally not attractive to a man, whose worth is often tied to their employment. Men generally do not want to have a sugar momma who brings home the bacon and pays for everything.

[–]Yezdigerd2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I think there are plenty of men who wouldn't mind that. The problem is that she likely will struggle to be satisfied with him as a man if she supports him like a child.

[–]obstinatebeagle1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

For most women it becomes a bigger issue actually. Someone else stated it correctly when they said women think they are entitled to higher earning men. Women will try to dress up this entitlement though, saying they want a man who is their "equal" and so on. Though it does occasionally happen, most women most of the time would never stoop to dating/marrying a guy who earns way less than them, unless he has some other redeeming characteristic that they find entirely thrilling like he is a bad boy.

Actually I think it's as simple as that. Women find money thrilling. They find status/fame thrilling. They find danger or excitement thrilling. If you can't offer a woman in a thrill, in a greater quantity than she already has on her own (ie. you have to have more money than her, or be badder than her) then you stand no chance.

[–]questioningwomandetached from society13 points14 points15 points 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

It doesn't if she's willing to date any income level.

[–]MorpheusGodOfDreamsCaught Red Handed1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Lol

[–]DupreeMcJones 2 points2 points2 points 9 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

What's wrong with that?

[–]MorpheusGodOfDreamsCaught Red Handed0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

not even close to realistic (talking long term, not short term dating).

[–]obstinatebeagle0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

see my reply here https://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/5htkes/everything_else_being_equal_why_does_being_a/db4iss2/

[–]80_20SCIENCE / non-incel incel advocate / NO PILL12 points13 points14 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

in marriages where women had more education they were 93 percent more likely to marry men with higher income than themselves

[–]Venicedreaming10 points11 points12 points 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

All the female doctors I know tend to be married to another doctor. That whole decade in med school tend to tangle people together. I can't think of one female doctor I know that has trouble dating, and I know a bunch. I get what you're getting at, but this specific example just doesn't click on my head

[–]throwinoutex-Red Pill, now Purple Man4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

This is my experience as well. And I know a lot of doctors just due to my upbringing and current lifestyle. The only others ones I can think of are married to men who used to be doctors in their home countries, but aren't in America.

I can't think of one female doctor I know that has trouble dating, and I know a bunch. Has less to do with her profession.

Yes. A woman who has "trouble" dating has to do with if she's ugly or if she has standards that are too high.

[–]GridReXXit be like that0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Same.

[–]DashneDK2King of LBFM-1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I know two female doctors, one is a lesbian (although her wife is also a doctor I think), the other just got diagnosed breast cancer - probably because of all her work.

[–]Venicedreaming0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I would blame cancer on pure act of God, not of her work. Did you know about 40% of all people will get cancer in their lifetime?

[–]rulenumber3039 points10 points11 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I've never noticed women who are doctors having extra difficulty finding partners... I went to a school in a really good area, a lot of people became doctors, they all seemed to do just fine. The partners of the female doctors seem to lean heavy towards self-employed men in businesses that allow them fairly flexible scheduling.

[–]gopher_glitz10 points11 points12 points 9 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

Because a female physician won't be happy with a guy who doesn't make more or have a higher status job. Women don't want men dumber than themselves.

It's dumb to earn less and still pay for everything.

[–]questioningwomandetached from society8 points9 points10 points 9 years ago* (9 children) | Copy Link

IQ and income aren't the same thing. Someone could have a PhD and be a Mensa member but be poor. An unemployed PhD with a 150 IQ is still smarter than the CEO with a 120 IQ.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

The CEO is rich, the PhD dude has got no job. How is the phd smarter? O.o

[–]questioningwomandetached from society3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

IQ, Mensa membership, more philosophical Maybe he has more time to study his interest into extreme detail than the CEO

[–]18Zuck0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I highly doubt you will find CEOs with that low of an IQ unless you were being hyperbolic.

[–]gopher_glitz0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Right but my point is a woman with a phd isn't going to hook up with a barista

[–]questioningwomandetached from society5 points6 points7 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

What if the Barista has a PhD but fell on hard times? Or the Barista is a Mensa member?

[–]gopher_glitz1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

She probably isn't going to be into him if he's broke and she is loaded.

[–]HigHog2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

[deleted]

What is this?

[–]gopher_glitz0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Then given your situation, OPs point is totally false.

[–]alteredflux4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

What I have observed in my circle is that female physicians generally tend to have Type 'A' personalities. High assertiveness, high attention to details and tend to lack patience. These attributes is what makes them successful in their profession.

What happens in the dating world is that some of them are looking for that perfect guy. The one that can challenge them and support their career aspirations. After all, very few women will throw away their career after investing 10+ years of post secondary education. Not a whole lot of people out there that can do that.

I am married to a female physician. Most of her friends and colleagues have partners that are not in medicine and do not earn as much the female physician. This is where I struggle with the some of the "Hypergamy" theory as noted above. I think for most of these women, they want a masculine guy that has their shit together, gets stuff done, is attractive, calls out their occasional bullshit, and is able to support her career aspirations.

[–]MorpheusGodOfDreamsCaught Red Handed2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I think for most of these women, they want a masculine guy that has their shit together, gets stuff done, is attractive, calls out their occasional bullshit, and is able to support her career aspirations.

100% true according to TRP. A man's Frame must be strong to manage the Hypergamy.

[–]Blaat19850 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

While these men are often more attracted to their polar feminine opposite than a women with masculine traits like that.

[–]Yezdigerd5 points6 points7 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Isn't this often covered? Women desire men mainly their status and for what they can do, Men desire women for how they look and are. Women are reluctant to date down. Meaning that the pool of men of interest for high status women is smaller.

It's not the ego the make average Joe avoid female doctors, they just understand that that such a relationship isn't likely to work out since the women have little desire to cater to a man she sees as her social inferior.

[–]Archibald_Andino[S] 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

It's not the ego the make average Joe avoid female doctors, they just understand that that such a relationship isn't likely to work out since the women have little desire to cater to a man she sees as her social inferior.

This is a great point. To the extent that men might not be comfortable dating someone like a female physician, it is mainly due to the fact that he has an awareness that, deep down, she resents her situation, has less respect for him, looks down on his lack of a higher income and education. He doesn't want to be guy who she unfortunately had to settle for, etc

[–]questioningwomandetached from society1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Being a physician has nothing to do with how good she looks though. She can be a very pretty doctor.

[–]despisedlove2Reality Pill Tradcon RP8 points9 points10 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Women marry for money. Men generally don't.

[–]tiposkChad Thundercock: the story of a manospherian homoerotic fantasy2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Is tht true or is it a stereotype?

[–]InBaggingArea2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Why not though? For some women, being married to a rich man is the smartest thing they did. Moral high ground or not, having a maid, a cook and a huge house beats moral high ground any day. That's like asking how unethical Wall Street bankers how they sleep at night. They got paid, and money is a great compromise for most people. Sure the trophy wives will never love those fat rich dudes, but they'll wipe their tears with diamonds, heck they may not ever even cry. Pop in a few kids to secure the deal, set for life. Their divorce settlement is more than 50% of everyone salary combined in a year. So I say again, why the hell not if they can go to the highest bidder

[–]fuxdpus3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Except if we're talking about female doctors, they're making good money themselves.

[–]InBaggingArea0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Except if we're talking about female doctors, they're making good money themselves.

But they have to work to get it.

Look, if a man wants to get something done he goes and does it.

If a woman wants to get something done, she has a choice. She can go and do it, or she can get a man to do it. That is her privilege.

[–]Archibald_Andino[S] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Which calls into question the reason for their stubborn hypergamy. Biology/evolution traits too strong to overcome? They already have the money, the lifestyle, the security, the independence, etc, etc. Yet so many would refuse to date a _____ (nurse, school teacher, someone who works in hospitality and so on) solely based on status.

[–]fuxdpus0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Biology/evolution traits too strong to overcome?

Yes, I suspect that this is the explanation.

But frankly I don't care. I'd be so much happier banging a fresh 18 yo in a 3rd world country than putting up with some "high status" 35 yo woman who thinks she's better than me.

[–]DashneDK2King of LBFM3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (45 children) | Copy Link

I would never go into a relationship with a female doctor (doctress). The hours they need to work are crazy, and she'd probably me married to her career, which would put unacceptable constraints on life. Except for money - which I'm not interested in, what possible benefits does a doctor give me that a shopgirl or waitress or student or something like that do not?

[–]questioningwomandetached from society3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago* (34 children) | Copy Link

Since you're not interested in money here's some others. Intelligent and interesting conversations. Better to help you solve problems because of higher IQ. More access to plastic surgery, body procedures, and anti aging treatments so she can look much younger? Healthcare for you as you age and an expert on what's wrong with you or your kids.

[–]DashneDK2King of LBFM1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

That's assuming doctors are more intelligent than waitresses and can have more interesting conversations. I think waitresses will have a few interesting stories to tell, and intelligence is kinda meh. Above a certain threshold it doesn't add much of value. I'm also not into plastic surgery or body procedures (assuming she's a plastic surgery doctor and owns her own clinic), and the best anti ageing treatment is to not live a stressful life - doctors are crazy stressed out. They also tend to smoke a hell of a lot, which is about the worst thing you can do ageing-wise. Especially if you are female.

[–]questioningwomandetached from society0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

Best anti aging is getting so much money you can spend on things the other people can't. Money is the fountain of youth. That's why celebs look so young and good looking even when they age. I mean does the average 50 year old woman look like Salma Hayek or the average 55 year old look like George Clooney? I wanna get rich so I can look 35 when I'm 55. That would be awesome. Conquer aging for as long as humanly possible and possibly death.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link

Lol solving what problems? High IQ is not guaranteed, too, btw. Having a doctorate may mean that she knows her field and studied a lot. Not that the IQ is high. I mean, there are PhDs in non-science fields like gender studies and psychology and "social sciences" etc.

Interesting conversations are nice, but if she is at work all the time, how are they possible? Intelligent? Like what? Her being a smartall and citing textbooks? No thanks. And again, it's not something even being considered until it's established that she's sexually enthusiastic, saved and gives her sexual best, pleasant to be around etc. For that you don't need a PhD.

[–]HigHog1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago* (10 children) | Copy Link

[deleted]

What is this?

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

Ahahaha you're definitely not a science major.

No, psychology is NOT a science, as the theories there do not meet criteria of science (e.g. popper's). Social "sciences" can use scientific method, but that won't make them sciences. I can use scientific method in culinary, it still wont' be a science. It's not just the method, it's also the object of studies/work.

[–]HigHog1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago* (8 children) | Copy Link

[deleted]

What is this?

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

Then you're lucky that the philosophy and methodology of science is not a requirement.

It's absolutely not a science. Once again, referring you to criteria of scientific theories. Or are you just gonna keep repeating the nonsense that it's a science? and downvote lmao? That's not what scientists do.

Psychology is not falsifiable, not easily verifiable and not even reproducible (what, 40% reproducibility rate?). It's absolutely not a science even if it tries to use the method actual scientists use.

[–]HigHog2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago* (6 children) | Copy Link

[deleted]

What is this?

[–][deleted] 0 points0 points0 points 9 years ago | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]LeaneGenovaBreaker of (comment) Chains[M] 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Be civil to other users. You've had two comments removed, so I suggest you familiarize yourself with the rules if you wish to keep posting.

[–][deleted] 1 points1 points1 points 9 years ago | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–][deleted] 1 points1 points1 points 9 years ago | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Good, if that's the case, then her work doesn't matter and isn't a negative factor. Other questions are still there though.

[–]despisedlove2Reality Pill Tradcon RP-1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (16 children) | Copy Link

You can get higher IQ from a scientist or an academic.

Why on earth would a husband agree to his wife having cosmetic surgery? She is only going to cheat after that (been there, got the dunce cap).

Better health care? Just have a decent health plan.

[–]questioningwomandetached from society2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

He'd agree so he can have a wife of a hotter SMV for years after the wall and look celeb like. She's also have access to all the anti aging and skin procedures and tons more.

Decent healthcare plans don't have someone in the house who know about all the latest drugs and treatments or know when something is wrong with you. You can't get that from an academic.

[–]despisedlove2Reality Pill Tradcon RP0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Except that she wouldn't be with him for years. Months. Maybe a year tops.

Having a doctor at home is a help. But a man would rather trust his own judgment than the judgment of a woman who has a vested interest in seeing him die in a non suspicious manner.

[–]DucksCanDanceRed-ish Man1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link

Depends on the plastic surgery

Boob lift in her 40s or post child birth stuff is a lot different than buying a new nose for your 20 year old bride

[–]DashneDK2King of LBFM3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I'd rather have a younger bride who doesn't need boob lifts, than an older bride who can afford boob lifts.

[–]DucksCanDanceRed-ish Man0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Yeah, but if I married a woman and somewhere down the road she wanted a boob lift, I wouldn't really be suspicious of that by itself. I'd really need some other reason to be concerned than just that alone

[–]DashneDK2King of LBFM0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

No, that's true. I've know many women who had the whole first-babies-then-boob-jobs route planned out years or even a decade before they actually had any kids.

[–]despisedlove2Reality Pill Tradcon RP2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

Not that different.

A woman, especially a doctor, who is suddenly trying to look better, is not doing it for her husband.

[–]DucksCanDanceRed-ish Man1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

suddently? My UMC classmates in high school were saying they'd want that stuff done after they were done with childbearing. They were planning something 15-25 years down the road

[–]despisedlove2Reality Pill Tradcon RP2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

They told you that because they weren't married to you.

[–]DucksCanDanceRed-ish Man1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

I'm not following what your saying

I think it's pretty common that women are fearful of what childbearing and old age will do to their bodies, women with the means to address those problems will do so.

Why you think that is coming on suddenly is beyond me. Do you think women don't know what childbearing will do to them? Do you think young women aren't aware of how their breasts will sag in 20 years? Do you think they are somehow being surprised by those things and then suddenly deciding to do something about it?

[–]despisedlove2Reality Pill Tradcon RP1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

No. The surprise lies usually in finding the next man to latch on to, once half of the husband's assets can be extracted.

[–]DucksCanDanceRed-ish Man1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

You're being too cynical , it happens but you're making it sound like it happens as a rule

[–]questioningwomandetached from society0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

What about botox and extreme anti aging stuff? Or liposuction?

[–]DucksCanDanceRed-ish Man0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I mean I don't really think it is correlated one way or the other with wanting to cheat, that doesn't make sense to me

I'd love to see stats though if anybody has em

[–]goatismycopilotPurple Pill Woman2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Female doctors are called doctors.

[–]rulenumber3031 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

Except for money - which I'm not interested in, what possible benefits does a doctor give me that a shopgirl or waitress or student or something like that do not?

A doctor is someone who could jump all the hurdles necessary to become a doctor. If you prioritize having smart kids she's probably a good bet. I mean not saying you won't find smart shopgirls, just there's other reasons they didn't become high paid professionals... maybe they have unstable family backgrounds, crippling anxiety, undiagnosed autism etc etc,

[–]questioningwomandetached from society0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago* (6 children) | Copy Link

A woman's career doesn't necessarily say her IQ. A woman can be homeless but have high creativity and a high IQ. She could be a poet that knows more than anyone around her yet people dismiss her wisdom or her poetry or works of art. Or the homeless guy who can talk to you about what's really going on in the world the general public doesn't know. They've seen more and can have far more depth.

Many people with these issues are marginalized and their wisdom, intelligence, and creativity are assumed not to be there when they often are. People judge them on their money or what they wear instead of what's in their minds or souls. They don't see the great wisdom or creativity that may be hiding. People with anxiety can be sensitive souls, empaths or hsps.

[–]yayeey150 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

It's just better to view the world in a probabilistic way.

[–]questioningwomandetached from society0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

But then you miss so much. I view the world in terms of possibility. If something's possible I entertain the thought.

[–]rulenumber3031 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

If something's possible I entertain the thought.

It is also possible the homeless person is a mentally unstable flake. That's very much possible. Have to entertain that thought too.

What is, however, a fact, is that a doctor jumped a lot of hurdles to become a doctor.

[–]questioningwomandetached from society1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Mentally unstable doesn't stop someone from being a creative genius.

[–]rulenumber3030 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Might stop them from being particularly fun to live with or reliable to parent children with.

[–]obstinatebeagle0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Or the homeless guy who can talk to you about what's really going on in the world the general public doesn't know.

Also known as the drunk raving loon.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's for some people. Especially me where I don't like to always be around my SO. I'm very introverted and like my space.

Being married to someone who's married to their career is certainly not for everyone.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

lol fuck that, the only reason women are ''attracted'' to doctors is because doctors make a bucket load of money, even more if the dude's a surgeon. Pure beta bux. Shitty profession for men to get true sexual attraction from women. Join the Army. Become a firefighter. Save a kitten. Become a pilot. Cut a tree down and grow a beard, now that's manly!

[–]InBaggingArea8 points9 points10 points 9 years ago (15 children) | Copy Link

This question can also be phased, "Why do women whore themselves out to the highest bidder"?

[–]DashneDK2King of LBFM8 points9 points10 points 9 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link

Or: "Why do men not whore themselves out to the highest bidder?"

[–]theiamsamuraiRavishment Realist7 points8 points9 points 9 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Hey, if I could get money, gifts, or free dinners for sex from women, I would. Too bad I'm a man.

[–]DashneDK2King of LBFM4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

You probably could. The women would just be of dubious looks. Like the old saying goes: if you marry for money, you're going to earn every penny of it.

[–]theiamsamuraiRavishment Realist1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

If you think it's so easy, make a fake posting on craigslist as a man looking to sell it to women. It's going to be cricket silence.

[–][deleted] 2 points2 points2 points 9 years ago | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]theiamsamuraiRavishment Realist1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

How does that help men to tell them as some form of a "gotcha!" that less than 5% of them can do what 99% of women can, but with much more work and time investment required? Gee, thanks, that makes me feel so much better.

[–]LUClENSociology of Sex &Courtship2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The market is way smaller, unless he wants to switch teams

[–]InBaggingArea0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Society does not allow men to look to women for financial support. There are exceptions.

There may be biological underpinnings to this. There may not be.

[–]5th_Law_of_Robotics0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Because money isn't as important for men in partner selection as it is for women.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Because I don't have chad looks.

[–]Venicedreaming4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Why not though? For some women, being married to a rich man is the smartest thing they did. Moral high ground or not, having a maid, a cook and a huge house beats moral high ground any day. That's like asking how unethical Wall Street bankers how they sleep at night. They got paid, and money is a great compromise for most people. Sure the trophy wives will never love those fat rich dudes, but they'll wipe their tears with diamonds, heck they may not ever even cry. Pop in a few kids to secure the deal, set for life. Their divorce settlement is more than 50% of everyone salary combined in a year. So I say again, why the hell not if they can go to the highest bidder

[–]InBaggingArea0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That would be a question for the OP. I merely rephrased the question.

I will put your response to the OP.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

This is false. I work with many female physicians. None of them struggled with dating.

In general, if a woman in the US is struggling with dating, it's likely because she's being too picky.

[–]ppdthrowawaiRed Pill0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

They struggle in that they are less likely to tend to their own social life and being a doctor is not the "bonus" that it is for men.

A large percentage of them pair off within their med school.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Wut? Male doctors tend to marry female doctors.

[–]goatismycopilotPurple Pill Woman1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

A vast majority of the female physicians I work with are married or in relationships.

[–]Five_DecadesKnows what women want. Knows he doesn't have it1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Because women are attracted to status and income, while men are not. Also women prefer to date up or across regarding socioeconomic status. Men don't care about that.

So female physicians have a tiny pool of men who are "good enough" for her (equal or higher SES), but that pool is full of elite men who have access to younger, prettier, nicer women. Why pick the female physician in that scenario?

[–]AutoModeratorBiased against humans[M] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link

Attention!

  • You can post off topic/jokes/puns as a comment to this Automoderator message.

  • For "CMV" and "Question for X" Threads: Parent comments that aren't from the target group will be removed, along with their child replies.

  • If you want to agree with OP instead of challenging their view or if the question is not targeted at you, post it as an answer to this comment.

  • OP you can choose your own flair, just press Flair under your post!

Thanks for your cooperation and enjoy the discussion!

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

Fam I would legit marry my doctor she hooks me up with so much speed (her words when handing me that script: "this is basically speed, it makes you feel really good, call me if you need a higher dose") and legit right I had an operation which she had no record of at all, and I just called up and asked for more opiates (hospital gave me some but I ate them all) and she gave me a script for the highest dose, only question she asked is am I sure I don't want something stronger?

If she's anything to go by doctors are a fucking hoot and I'd happily spend my life in pharmaceutical bliss with one.

She's hot af too, all skinny and shit probably because she's on speed herself. Docs here can write their own prescriptions.

[–]RojoEscarlataRed Pill1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Red flags all over the place, but I'll say she is into you, go for it.

Wouldn't recommend a LTR tho.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Nah she's like double my age (doesn't look it tho) and already married with kids, I'm just saying I am a quite a fan of doctors.

[–]questioningwomandetached from society0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Or morphine for hallucinations and realizations.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Let me tell you oral morphine is weak, essentially might as well be codeine. You'd need to shoot it or plug it.

Ask for an opiate with a higher oral BA.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

really? can she get speed for all of us?

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Only if you ask nicely :)

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

pleassse =D

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

I need your doctor.. What kinda speed? I need some

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I need your doctor..

Seems like you need to get in line.

What kinda speed? I need some

https://imgur.com/a/4RFKn

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Interesting.. Are they for a certain condition?? I'll have to ask around

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

ADHD.

[–]GoldPisseR0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

A man's appeal is his status, simple as that.

All the RP idiots who think engineers and doctors are 'betas' just because they marry late 20s reformed sluts are delusional.

And to think that rich guys are likely to be ugly, quit kidding yourselves.

Most of them look all right and have an attractive enough personality.

Looks only work in college, post that its your job that counts.

[–]exit_sandmanstill not the MGTOW sandman FFS1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

All the RP idiots who think engineers and doctors are 'betas' just because they marry late 20s reformed sluts are delusional.

Let me put it like this: an engineer/doctor who marries a late 20s reformed slut is a beta.

[–]GoldPisseR1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

What if the slut is a high earning partner herself?

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

How does it matter? If she took many other dicks without having them marry her and now expect this doctor to marry her to stay with her and he goes with it - he is a beta. Especially if then turns out that she "matured" and doesn't do some sexual acts from the past anymore.

It's not related to her income whatsoever.

[–]fuxdpus0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This video explains it. Think of a pyramid or a triangle. Women near the top of the pyramid only want men above them. That's only a small part of the pyramid. Men near the top will date women below them. That's a much bigger dating pool.

Women care about their partner's status and men generally don't. Men don't mind marrying down, but women don't like to date/marry down. So higher status women aren't willing to consider a big portion of the male population. Whereas higher status men will date a bigger percentage of women.

The US Supreme Court is an example. Almost all the male judges are married or in serious relationships with women of lower socioeconomic status. But only 1 of the 3 female judges was married. And the married one was married to a world renowned legal expert.

[–]sunkindonut149Blue Pill Mouse0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I think women outnumber men in the health care field.

[–]MorpheusGodOfDreamsCaught Red Handed0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago* (11 children) | Copy Link

I've explained this many times before: the best way to understand it is by understanding how high heels affect a woman's perception.

A woman generally needs a man who is at least 2 inches taller than her so that she can feel protected and so she can literally look up to him. The taller the better. (average height difference between men and women in the same country is about 2 inches)

So that same woman now wears 2 inch heels. Suddenly, the man who was 2 inches taller than her is not enough. She has effectively cut him out of her dating pool.

Now take this same concept (hypergamy) and apply it to work. This effect has been measured and confirmed by SCIENCE!

http://faculty.maxwell.syr.edu/jmtowsen/Publications/Law%20Students%20J.%20Psychology.pdf

https://ai2-s2-pdfs.s3.amazonaws.com/a606/90a0c69ad3669b235801e769de9fe1f7c880.pdf

so bloopers can suck it, even as they try to rationalize it with weak reasons like "men just can't handle a strong, independent woman! You go girl!" which is clearly and obviously nothing more than feminine comforting bullshit language. Men would simply rather have a woman that puts him first.

obviously it is natural female tendency to have higher standards and thus more pickiness due to pregnancy, and having the pill does not change millions of years of biological programming. Nurture is ALWAYS built on top of Nature, dummies.

To make matters even more hilarious, more women than men are going into undergrad universities now, and half of the guys are nerdy engineers that smell bad. So women have an even smaller dating pool to work with. Men in the dating pool (now looks more and more like 80/20) leverage this to have many short term flings, and girls try to fight back with rape accusations. Comedy all around!

Then the girls get out of undergrad with tons of student loan debt, useless liberal arts degrees, and few job opportunities, since any employer will clearly value the labor of a man more than a woman aside from sex appeal and jobs like schoolteacher, nursing, HR, PR, etc. Don't worry, these jobs are more needed than ever to pump out that comforting bullshit language.

The women then spend their times in cubicles reading Jezebel, Salon, and Buzzfeed for that sweet outrage, spending too much money on clothing that they barely wear, while hitting the club and getting drunk on weekends. They also are busy frying their oxytocin receptors by getting into many short term relationships, since they have been taught to imitate men (at least the alphas, betas are invisible to them in the dating market). They hit 30, panic, and grab the nearest beta to start a family that will likely go through a dead bedroom and then a divorce.

Its just too bad that starting at 30 and rapidly going through this process leaves women with barely any energy to chase after a kid, much less 2 or more. Don't worry though, the shrinking birth rate has worried politicians enough to make them import massive amounts of brown people who have lots of kids for religious reasons (oh, those noble savages). This means the next generation will be more dependent on government services, which guarantees jobs for social workers and police (gotta have that sweet guilt and that warrior class to keep the danger at bay). Germany and Sweden are great examples of this.

All of this could have been avoided if people let go of the bullshit marxist blank slate ideology and chose to work with biology instead of against it. Any smart woman would recognize the years spent dating, getting engaged, married, being pregnant, and having kids, and decide to plan it out. She would immediately get out of undergrad at 22 and look for an established man in his early 30s to get married and stay married. As the kids reach school age she can start working part time, then move on to full time. None of this "have it all" corporate bullshit that women are raised to believe.

Watch as the bloopers try super hard to deny everything I wrote, in 3...2...1...

[–][deleted] 1 points1 points1 points 9 years ago | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]MorpheusGodOfDreamsCaught Red Handed0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago* (7 children) | Copy Link

You act as if there are no out of shape women under 30 raising children.

men's taste varies much more than women, and yes, being fat makes you have less energy. Unhealthy weight loss still means less energy, but it can be managed.

why can't a man in his 30's marry above 22 years old

he can, but all men like younger women. After undergrad seems like a good time, as 18 is just only out of high school. Past undergrad its all downhill.

Also, 22 year old women go who go after men in their 30's sometimes do so because they have daddy issues, which means the marriage will be shit for all involved.

screening process is important.

A man in his 30's is better off finding a woman within 5 years of his age.

not necessarily, the focus on age is really just a blue pill ideology of "having more in common". This is complete crap. Women like older men, men like younger women. They can both find what works for them.

Research shows after 40 is when child rearing becomes difficult/dangerous.

that is when it becomes EXTREMELY dangerous. mid 30s is where birth complications start to grow substantially, and the low energy leads to worse childcare. Again, a smart woman would start looking for a husband immediately out of undergrad.

[–][deleted] 1 points1 points1 points 9 years ago | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]MorpheusGodOfDreamsCaught Red Handed0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

My mother had 3 health children from 33-38.

lucky her.

Red pills bend the truth just because they play such high value on "omg she's so young". It's ridiculously immature thinking.

why? Seriously, try to break this down. Guys like younger women, younger women are at peak fertility and attractiveness to raise children. Why is this "immature?" Why are you using such a specific buzzword that you have been trained to use as a label on thoughts you disagree with?

reality that a 22 year old isn't ready to be a wife and mother.

who is ignoring reality? A 22 year old is clearly ready, and this has been true for the past 5000 years. Here is where Blue Pill programming really breaks down because it does not realize she has everything she needs.

Do you want that guy's username?

sure, why not

[–][deleted] 1 points1 points1 points 9 years ago | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]MorpheusGodOfDreamsCaught Red Handed0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

The kid could still come out fucked up

as in all pregnancies. So this is irrelevant.

and there's a good possibility she isn't ready to raise a child.

WHAT DOES THIS MEAN?! She is ready by any measurable statistic. The only thing you can use here is that she wants to focus on career, which is again part of corporate brainwashing.

He's an unemployed 25 year old alcoholic. His mother was 23 when he was born.

alcoholism is different from age, and there are probably other factors. Why do you think age solves all of these problems instead of adding new ones?

So which woman was a better mother?

most likely culture and upbringing of both mothers was the primary difference.

[–][deleted] 1 points1 points1 points 9 years ago | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]questioningwomandetached from society0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

They are ready but this economy makes things harder than it should be. We need universal income so they can if they want to.

[–]MorpheusGodOfDreamsCaught Red Handed0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

don't have the life experience and maturity to raise children.

completely false. they have been playing and acting as mothers to prepare since early childhood. And women mature faster than men, so you are only talking about getting older and not having kids. How does that help exactly?

I don't know how much clearer I can be.

you are completely unclear because you are just repeating dogma without any details. That is a clear tell for brainwashing. If I ask you to explain yourself and you just say "OMG I CANT EVEN" that means that you have no real reason to believe it.

I don't know and never have known any 22 year old women who are selfless and mature enough to bring a child into the world without fucking it up.

I have. You just hang around a bunch of self centered sluts. Spoiler: they don't mature or become selfless with age, they instead attach their selfishness to the child. I have seen this happen many times, and the kids are fucked up.

Women in their 30's are more mature, wise, and therefore MORE READY to be mothers.

mature how? Wise how? Just by dating and living longer? How does that prepare someone to be a mother? Sounds like bullshit to keep women as consumers.

All you are telling me is that age = better prepared. So that means I can take any old retired person and they would be better prepared to do any job than someone younger. Do you see how dumb such a statement is?

So now you say "nuh uh, motherhood is different!" But its not. You can be trained to do anything, and women naturally have everything they need by around age 18. Mature body, extended social circle, family wisdom, etc. Nothing notable changes afterwards, even if there is some extra brain development.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter