Go bag and DNA tests are equivalent

I don't understand how this is controversial in any way shape or form.

If man asks for DNA test, women claim that he doesn't trust her and she has every right to leave

If a woman has a go bag, a man has every right by the same logic to leave her because she doesn't trust him.

Now we can be charitable in both cases, DNA test doesn't cost a woman anything (unless she is lying) and a go bag doesn't cost a man anything (unless he is a insecure about her leaving him).

Both cases we can say that both men and women have reasonable fears and in both cases consequences can be catastrophic for the victim.

But women can't have it both ways, they can't expect men to fully trust them but be mad when men don't tolerate anything less than complete trust.

And I have been reading that women make distinction because paternity fraud has already happened and go bag is for future precaution. So they are not equalvalent. What level of mental gymnastics would you have to do to ignore the simple easy peasy fact that women were the one who said....

... That they are leaving because man doesn't trust them. That same reason for a man leaving for go bag is used. It's not about both of them being completely absolutely equavelnt

(Casual misogyny alert: women can't say that are as rational as men if they can pull of this level of mental gymnastics on the fly, they just can't. )

The question that is in front of us is, is a man as much in the right to leave a woman for having a go bag as a woman is for leaving a man for paternity test.

The resounding answer is YES. Because if not having complete trust( irrespective of whether that fear is valid) is a good enough reason to leave then YES, both paternity test and go bags are equivalent.