So, someone who commented on one of my comments alerted me that a quasi-law (not a law yet but cases regarding it exist and it may become a law) that details deception or "fraudulent consent" exists that implies consent is not purely binary, and has terms that must also be fulfilled. Here is a small article on this:

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/rape-by-deception-may-become-a-crime-in-massachusetts/

In one case, a man was accused of rape because he used a prosthetic penis instead of his real penis. There is also another case in Israel of a man claiming to be a neurosurgeon to be deemed more attractive to a woman so she will want to have sex with him.

To me, I think this is a ridiculous idea because it misinterprets what sexual consent is, according to feminists even. It's simply supposed to be the consent to sexual activity, be it oral, vaginal, anal, etc. It's not meant to encapsulate anything else in it. If someone agrees to sex in a fully sober-state, they are agreeing to sex. The yes means yes law dictates just that.

So the question is, do you believe deception, or trickery should violate consent, and be treated by the law as such? Why or why not?