~ archived since 2018 ~
Popular
Other
swiet
[–][deleted] 496 points497 points498 points 7 years ago (32 children) | Copy Link
"Straight men are so incapable of expressing their emotions. This is a clear example of toxic masculinity."
Straight men: This upsets and offends us.
"Hahaha stop being so fragile"
???????
[–]livegamer999 174 points175 points176 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Straight men:"feminists are exaggerating we're not assholes"
Feminist: "shut up you white racist man, you're so dumb of course you are all racist mysogynist assholes
[–]codereview 18 points19 points20 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
You forgot "entitled"
[–]Lonescu 24 points25 points26 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Came here just to say this. "Toxic masculinity" and expressing emotion are diametrically opposed to one another.
[–]PixelPete85 7 points8 points9 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
'toxic' would be to invalidate every emotion except anger
[–]Jex117 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Bingo.
You're allowed to cry, you're allowed to wear pink clothes, you're allowed to be afraid, but you're not allowed to be angry.
[–]ChuckDexterWard 9 points10 points11 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Those of us who are not straight were also offended. SOLIDARITY!
[–]Buzzkill78 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
“If you’re getting offended by it you’re part of the problem” <—- this makes me lose my shit
[+]junkeee999 -28 points-27 points-26 points 7 years ago (24 children) | Copy Link
This is a false choice sort of argument.
Yes men should express their feelings. That doesn't mean your feelings are free from criticism. If someone is of the opinion (as I am) that the Gillette ads are not aimed at all males then they would naturally criticize your taking offense to them.
[–]CyberToyger 23 points24 points25 points 7 years ago (17 children) | Copy Link
No, it's not a false choice sort of argument. The same people who complain that men never express their emotions and wonder aloud why men never express their emotions, are making fun of men for expressing their emotions. There's no twisting it, that's whats going on, plain as day.
And apparently we saw completely different ads, as did all the men and women calling Gillette out on their bullshit. What you might call "reading into things" or "projecting", I call "watching the ad more than one time and listening to every word instead of taking it at face value, and acquiring further context by learning about the person behind the terrible ad". And that person is Kim Gehrig, a left-wing Feminist with a history of making outlandish videos -- most on the surface seeming positive and encouraging for women, though clearly peddling the usual Wage Gap mythos and Female Victimhood trope, along with a couple decrying men as generally toxic and 'the good ones not doing enough to stop others from being toxic'.
[+]junkeee999 -15 points-14 points-13 points 7 years ago* (11 children) | Copy Link
You're not being made fun of for showing emotions. You're being made fun of for being offended due to a logically flawed belief.
[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link
I think you are missing the overreaching themes that people are reacting to
[–]junkeee999 -2 points-1 points0 points 7 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link
I think I'm missing things that are clearly not in the ad yes. I'm missing things that you are reading into it that simply aren't there. Period.
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link
Nothing exists in a vacuum my guy. At face value it says a lot of positive things about men, which is notably warm and fuzzy, especially during the parenting moments. And like I said, it's definitely not a negative ad overall, underlying message being men can be amazing, which shouldn't exactly be a surprise to anyone. But the purpose of the ad is that men need to be better. Men need to stop....selling drugs? Are men the only ones who perpetrate crimes? And men need to stop sexualizing women, ok, but shouldn't both genders be more respectful towards a person's humanity? And what about men being supportive of their daughters? I think most men are great parents, and the one's who aren't, telling them to "be better" is probably a tad oversimplified.
Imagine this commercial filled with women in this. It's probably a bit hard to imagine because our culture tells us women are the underdogs. Our culture tells us women are already great. That's why people are calling it sexist
[–]junkeee999 -2 points-1 points0 points 7 years ago* (7 children) | Copy Link
Nope. The message is some men need to stop doing these things. You are simply looking at this as through your own personal filter and claiming the results to be fact.
They are not.
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
There are lots of things some women need to stop doing as well but we don't have commercials about it. Bear in mind, I have no stake in this, because I don't have a stake between my legs. I also don't find the commercial offensive, but that doesn't mean I can't see the biases and problems with it.
So if you don't mind me asking, what does men's rights mean to you, and why are you here?
[–]junkeee999 -1 points0 points1 point 7 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
I'm here to discuss men's rights topics. Differing views aren't allowed?
[+]junkeee999 -17 points-16 points-15 points 7 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
You are reading things into the ad that simply aren't there, in order to promote your very narrow and specific view.
[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
No, it's very apparent you don't like white men to have a viewpoint.
Here's a for instance you might understand:
"I don't like the idea that black people commit crime."
Advert shows how black men commit crime and could be "better" by not committing so much crime.
Black male outrage.
"YOU MUST COMMIT CRIME!"
[–]junkeee999 -1 points0 points1 point 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
There are plenty of initiatives out there aimed at a certain element of black men to be better people. I do not see any any general black male outrage over this. Because they know it's not a blanket denouncement of the entire group. Something which you apparently do not know.
[–]Jex117 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
There are plenty of initiatives out there aimed at a certain element of black men to be better people.
Yeah? Name one.
[–][deleted] 14 points15 points16 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Parroting the phrase 'fragile masculinity' over and over on Twitter does not count as 'criticising your taking offence'. It is mockery.
[–]junkeee999 -5 points-4 points-3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Strawman
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I get where you are coming from, but I think everyone is offended because of how it intersects with modern feminism, and it ignores issues men face while telling them they need to be better. It's not an entirely negative commercial, but it is a biased one. That being said I'm going to break down some of the things that I think are plausible enough to seem "sensible." Which I think modern feminism tends to do by the way, the ideas can seem reasonable when they get diluted enough, except the fundamental logic is flawed.
So when we see the kids playing and apologizing to eachother, I think this sends the message that kids aren't allowed to play rough. I think this seems sweet at first glance, but I think it's up for debate whether this is normal play or fighting, because we don't see them fighting which implies play. Obviously if they are just playing, this is a weird message to be sending.
Cut to the scenes where we see some over sexualization of women. I don't take a huge offense with this one. I think it is good to treat anyone with respect, but, it's again one sided, we don't see women repeating this message, only men, and women do this too. Another issue I have with this is that this is a superficial message really, it doesn't cut down to issues we really need to be talking about.
The overall theme is that some men are crappy, which is true, except the commercial ignores that some women are also crappy, which is why it is problematic.
[–]samuraishogun1 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I like to think that a REAL man knows when to ask for help.
Source: am one.
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
"If you're not bad you won't be offended"
Is not bad but is offended
"YOU MUST BE BAD!"
[–]junkeee999 -1 points0 points1 point 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
That makes no sense
[–]IronJohnMRA 370 points371 points372 points 7 years ago (52 children) | Copy Link
Why? Well because someone has to be the bad guy. If they were allowed to be offended like everyone else they would be allies. If there aren't any predators there can't be victims. Thats why picking a group thats trained not to fight back makes them the easiest targets.
[–]RockmanXX 103 points104 points105 points 7 years ago (36 children) | Copy Link
Well because someone has to be the bad guy
More specifically, the "Evil Majority". The left has an obsession with making everything a damn class struggle, even when there is no class struggle in a liberal democratic society.
[–][deleted] 84 points85 points86 points 7 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link
Men are not the majority, women are (50.8%).
[–]RockmanXX 95 points96 points97 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Yeah but Men are painted as the female oppressors through their patriarchal magic or some shit. Even though its a cooked up myth, a lot of people seem to believe that Men really do systematically oppress women.
[–][deleted] 34 points35 points36 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
True, people are indeed idiots.
[–]JosephBw 14 points15 points16 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Can confirm, I am one of them
[–]yungdolpho 8 points9 points10 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
You're not that big of an idiot if you know your an idiot 🧐
[–]hectorduenas86 31 points32 points33 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
3 years in HS my classroom was 8 males 21 females, total count of students in my year was 350, only 108 males. My female classmates were brutal... they had “clans” of 3-4 members among them and basically reinforced every bad stereotype of HS... one girl was fine with hanging out with herself or friends from other classrooms, she was then bullied into changing to another group, there were so many instances of unfairness against us, starting with our guidance teacher, a divorced 40-something woman who openly told us she hated men. On senior year a girl was punished to spend a whole month in our classroom, so go figure. In the first year we were having soccer matches against the other groups, they lost and got into a fist fight against the other team. I have so many stories of HS involving my female classmates that could shudder anyone here.
[–][deleted] 7 points8 points9 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Please continue, tell more, I am intrigued by your story.
[–]hectorduenas86 19 points20 points21 points 7 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link
Wasn't expecting a request but here I go:
A bit of a background my country of birth is under a communist dictatorship which is relevant due to their indoctrination/brainwashing practices and I assisted to a High Academic Performance School (IPVCE) that works as a college in where you lived there with your classmates. You work, study and practice sports like you'll eventually do in life.
Once a month, we had these assemblies in where 1 by 1 you'll get the chance to critique your classmates due to their academic performance, behavior, manners, contributions and anything social (basically a beta version of China's Social Scoring) and professors took notes and evaluations that could affect your scholarships. Since we were outnumbered by the female classmates every time it was a guy's time to be "constructively criticized" it turned out to be about personal attacks, accusations and basic verbal abuse... we have a professor (female in this case) in charge of us throughout the whole 3 years of HS, like a guidance counselor, she hated us and explicitly said so in several occasions, so you could expect a "gloves off" "no foul contest" situation every time it was a guy in the bench, most of the time it was bullying, your classmates saying to your face every little thing they hated/disliked about you in front of your peers and others, what others will consider traumatic for us 8 was basically a monthly occurrence, and I won't lie it alienated us from them even if we shared the same roof... any girl that sympathized or got cozy with us was in for some shunning, gossip and criticism as well. Eventually they earned a reputation for being nasty, not all of them but as I mentioned they had micro-groups in where they acted alike and had similar interests, anyone outside those tiny gangs was a target to them, regular high school drama but multiplied by how many "disliked" you... so every year around Valentine's a mailbox was set in the principal's office to send love letters anonymously to anyone you liked... and most of them were read in a public event like a party and you could choose to reveal yourself, basically Secret Santa Valentine Edition... on senior year this girl from another class got into a brawl with another girl, as a measure they were relocated for a month to different classes, 1 ended up on mine... oh boy, imagine how infamous we were (Class 11) that it was a punishment to be sent over there... she also had to share the same dormitories; anyways they made her life miserable since she was from a different city and class, but this girl wasn't about to give up and surrender, she told her classmates and they came up with the most funniest and roast-like poem dedicated to specifically the girls in my class... it was really funny to listen the secretary read an entire poem roasting some students in front of the whole school, everybody laughed and the reason why she didn't stop was because everyone knew it was all true and they were fed up with these women. The World Cup from 2002, final game, I think it was a Sunday, we had to take care of some gardens surrounding the school, basic landscaping but with no mowers, just machetes to cut the grass... we stayed out working our asses until 11pm to not have to do it the next morning and watch the game, but the girls were in charge of picking up the leaves and dump the trash and just fix the flowers, etc... next day the ratted on us, principal came to the class, unplugged our TV and made us go to work on something we already did... and just because they were petty and "jealous" that we had our job done already... we missed the game, unlike every other group who didn't care that the guys were watching the game since they all did the same as us and worked prior to have those hours free. It was common to snitch on some of the guys for anything stupid, not to share notes, etc it was like they were two groups in the class, eventually some of these girls matured and realized that they were wrong but it wasn't until the last semester when we were almost parting ways. There are so many things happened, mostly bad for us only, and it was mostly facilitated because the balance was on their favor, it was almost 3 to 1, every voted was suppressed, every opinion was disregarded, because they had majority, and most of the time acted petty and vengeful. I don't know if these anecdotes prove any specific point, besides HS is tough and sometimes full of mean girls, but one thing we know we went through some tough moments and a lot of them could've been easier if we had their support or if they weren't the ones actually causing it, I was targeted more than once because I refused to keep my mouth shut and they got tired of making false claims and personally attack me, I was accused of stealing, at some point the Principal got involved and the only person to care about my innocence and actually prove that I haven't done anything wrong was the Secretary, the same one who read out loud that poem that exposed to everyone how they were actually perceived by their classmates. One of them slept with the Biology teacher in order to get the Final exam results and answers, she then shared it with all of the girls while us fellas kept studying... we had no idea they had the answers, but someone snitched on them the night before... then word got out that half the school knew the answers and in the hours prior to exam they changed the questions, and because we actually studied instead of preparing cheat sheets... let's just say that the karma train left the station and it didn't stop until the moment to choose an University came and most of them wanted to go to the same one and scholarships were extremely limited like 3-6 for hundreds in the whole province, most of their friendships ended when they realized they were doing to each other the same shit they did to us for years. As a note all 8 of us plus some of our best friends got into the colleges that we wanted and we're doing fairly well, we served in the army together and went with our lives. The hard times we had in HS shaped our lives in so many ways, we basically became men over there.
Edit: Despite that the best memories I have are from those golden years, the advantage of being surrounded by many women was that there was no shortage of attractive girls to date, and the odds were on your side; the circumstances on the other hand, that allowed them to voice or yell accusations, criticism without verification of truth weren't beneficial for men. Basically if a girl claimed you did something like stealing mechanical pencil leads (I was authorized to check that girl's desk by her and borrow some, yet she didn't absolve me of it) from a classmate you were already declared guilty. Another story but it wasn't in my school but in my best friend's... this girl got named Snowhite, as in she had a gangbang with 7 dudes, presumably consensual since she was known for being "popular" and loose, wanted to graduate with a bang, when her religious family found out (because she bragged about it in class) she them claimed she was raped, and those 7 dwarves ended up in jail... no evidence needed besides her testimony.
[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Damn, I feel so sorry that happened to you. But It's good that you're all okay and doing well. Karma happens to everybody, and it always happens at the best times, and that's what I like about being patient.
[–][deleted] 24 points25 points26 points 7 years ago2 (2 children) | Copy Link
There can be class struggle, it’s just not A vs B. It’s a spectrum of power that you can subdivided anyway that fits your narrative and that’s the problem.
I’d argue most of our problems today come from meaningless divisions among ourselves. It’s not men vs women, left vs right, black vs white, etc. it’s everyone vs everyone. Every problem is a societal problem, societies fault. Men didn’t get together and agree to keep women in the home, society did. Just like women didn’t get together and agree to be the gatekeepers of relationships and intimacy. These are all derived from the old order that we needed in order to survive and civilize ourselves to the point we are today.
People always want someone to blame, and it’s a lot harder to accept your group shares just as much of the blame as the people you feel hurt you. Women that feel society sexualizes them too much leave out that women sexualize themselves as a form of power. Just like men’s fear of intimacy is mostly fear of ridicule by other men. Society brings this upon itself.
The only true divisions are society, and the self. There are so many vairiables related that it turns into a recursive clusterfuck in which we are all both the cause and solution to our problems. It’s time we stop focusing on problems and instead focus on the solutions.
[–]SwiggityStag 5 points6 points7 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Severely underrated comment.
[–]steamedhamjob 5 points6 points7 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I agree with u/swiggitystag. This is very underrated, and basically explains the problem perfectly
[–]C4H8N8O8 20 points21 points22 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
There is indeed class. Although i don't say there is struggle. There is the superrich that at the end of the day control 90% of the goverments, there is a middle class, and there is a poor class as a reminder for the middle class.
[–]MadderHater 8 points9 points10 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
The middle class are just poor people who have been convinced to hate poorer people. Anyone who tries to tell you otherwise has something to gain.
[–]C4H8N8O8 7 points8 points9 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Pretty much. And the same justification has been used to hate /opposite gender/ different ethnic / for political power.
[–]toggleme1 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I’m telling you otherwise and I have nothing to gain. Nor do I care about you or anyone else here. What you just said was copy pasta. I know thinking for yourself isn’t the easiest possible route but worth it every now and the mate.
[–][deleted] 26 points27 points28 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
The left has an obsession with making everything a damn class struggle
Traditionally the left focused on class. Intersectional feminism focusses on everything except class. This is because most of its adherents are well off, and it's difficult to portray yourself as a victim if class is viewed the primary indicator of privilege (which it obviously is).
there is no class struggle in a liberal democratic society.
That's a preposterous statement. For example thousands of men in the US were murdered just trying to establish union rights.
The businesses class certainly doesn't share your naiveté. There was a leaked memo from Goldman Sachs referring to the US as a "plutonomy" (rule by the rich). Moreover the majority of the population disagrees. Polls show that most Americans think the government is run by a few rich interests "looking out for themselves".
[–]OldSchoolNewRules 15 points16 points17 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
The class struggle is against the people who just wrote their own tax breaks into law.
[–]Lethn 14 points15 points16 points 7 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link
Ironically, the very left who try to perpetrate and declare a class struggle are the bourgeois they claim to be against. They spit on the average voter, especially the white working class and nowhere is that attitude more prevalent than in Britain.
Oddly enough, despite America and so on being very Capitalist societies even by European standards there are less problems with class there than other countries that I've observed. The left are all the same across the west though, they're always made up of rich white cunts telling the rest of us how to live and lecturing people poorer than them that they should be heavily taxed to pay for all of their pet projects.
[–]e1k3 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Would you seriously argue there are no class struggles in western societies? Inequality is jarring and worse than at any point before and is reaching neofeudal levels.
[–]RockmanXX 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
I have accepted the fact that economic inequality will always exist in society, we can never have a utopia. There are Rich&Poor classes but i don't see any labour revolution coming.
[–]DignifiedAlpaca 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I feel like someday total automation of manufacturing will fix the problem, as in every family having their own robot that builds them everything they need. Obviously I have no way of knowing if this is how things will happen though.
[–]BobbyMcFrayson 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link
You literally have an entire subreddit whose only purpose is to complain about women who disagree with you. Do you have no sense of self awareness?
[–]RockmanXX 3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link
You're saying that as if i can't talk about Human Rights without being a leftist ideologically. Its the same logic as "If you believe in equal rights you're a feminist" rhetoric.
[–]BobbyMcFrayson 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link
Human rights are part of the left and the right, it is just that one side believes that rights belong to the rich and the other believes that we should all have rights regardless of our demographics.
[–]RockmanXX 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
Just that one side believes that rights belong to the rich
Nice strawman there, you should call Right Wing Neo-Nazis while you're at it.
[–]BobbyMcFrayson -1 points0 points1 point 7 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
The Right wing is not neo nazis. Nazis are nazis and they are not humans. People on the right are just fed massive amounts of misninformation and are psychologically conditioned by the rich into giving up their own rights so the rich dont have to work.
By trying to somehow claim I am posing a straw man, you yourself made the strawman fallacy. If anything, you could claim I made a gross overgeneralization - which, to an extent, I did - however I made no such fallacy. The right say with their policies and actions the rich are the only ones who deserve rights.
[–]RockmanXX 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago* (3 children) | Copy Link
you yourself made the strawman fallacy
Sarcasm isn't your strongest suit. is it? I said "You may as well call Right wing Nazis". Its a figure of speech.
I made no such fallacy
Calling right wing literal idiots who give away their rights for the rich is not the textbook definition of Right Wing. You're literally calling Right Wing a "wrong" Ideology. Go back to your feminist echo chamber already.
[–]BobbyMcFrayson 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
If that's how you want to interpret what you said, you may. I'm not the one typing out sarcastic comments on the internet in a group that is commonly associated with the alt-right, and it is not my job to make sure you feel like I am not assuming you're on their side.
I never called right wingers idiots. They've been intentionally misled. Even the most intelligent people in the world can be misled, especially if they had been conditioned since birth to fall in line. I think it is a "wrong" ideology in that it is based purely on propoganda and traditionalism in order to take rights away from the working class. I know the right defines it very differently. You can make all the inferences you'd like from that.
I'm clearly not in a feminist echo-chamber here, am I? I am also subbed to probably a half dozen other conservative subreddits. I am well read in theoretical literature from conservatives and right-leaning neoliberals. I will also engage with other leftists on topics that I feel strongly about.
[–]RockmanXX 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
a group that is commonly associated with the alt-right
LMAO no racism is allowed on this Sub. Conservatives/Alt-Right are in fact enemies of MRA's as they want to keep the status quo of tradition. MRA's want to change long held views of men&women, its something no conservative would agree with.
[–]Morristron2099 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Hey, you should work on better understanding righty political opinions. You just regurgitated a really inaccurate caricature of a right wing position.
[–]BobbyMcFrayson 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I do understand "righty" opinions. I was a libertarian for about 5 years and could come up with reasons you would likely agree with for almost any political topic on the right. I've learned more over time, though, and can safely say that "caricature" accurately captures reality from my point of view.
[–]Zoenboen 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Fucking stop with this left right shit here. God damn it's so old and you aren't even right all the time. There lefty and liberal men who want rights - what's your point? Are we leftist by saying we aren't treated equally or some uber-left, right but not the same as you described because we just aren't?
It's a false dichotomy and doesn't need to be here.
[–]RockmanXX -1 points0 points1 point 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Feminism is a left ideology whether you like it or not. Learning more about the left can give you a clearer picture of Feminism and why it is the way it is.
[–]hash_bang22 -2 points-1 points0 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
That class struggle is the basis of socialism/communism, and that, I fear, is their end game.
[–]themolestedsliver 8 points9 points10 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Why? Well because someone has to be the bad guy.
Not only that, but think about how much money is given to feminist causes and or "the plight of women". Think about how many politicians put on their platform "women's rights' (as if women in america have less rights than men).
The money has to come from somewhere and if male issues get any attention then the conspiracy comes crashing down.
wait if men have factually less rights, why are people putting "women's rights" on their campign ticket. They don't want to have to answer.
wait if men's issues get funding it will take away from the funding feminist issues gets they don't want to even risk that, so best say we live in a patriarchy.
[–]knoxfire -1 points0 points1 point 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
LOVE to see those numbers. Factually less rights, let's see you prove it. And you aren't allowed to dismiss frequency of sexual assault, wage gaps or hiring preferences against women, violence and oppression in dozens of countries across the globe, domestic abuse numbers. Let's do it by the facts right here right now if you are so sure of yourself.
https://youtu.be/6TgV4kRdDrE
[–]Lick_The_Wrapper 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Exactly. Women in America aren’t disproportionately assaulted or murdered by men. No woman has ever been killed for saying ‘no’ or anything like that.
[+]Jake0024 -8 points-7 points-6 points 7 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link
As a man, I don't get this. I never thought the ad was referring to me because I generally try not to be an asshole, and the ad was clearing only referring to men who are assholes.
If you got mad about the Gillette thing, it seems like you either specifically identify with the assholes the ad was targeting, or you get upset when someone confronts anyone who shares any characteristics with you at all (like having a penis), even if they're not talking about you.
If you're offended by someone basically saying "hey, all you people who are being assholes, you should stop being such assholes," then... I just don't get it.
Men are basically allowed to feel three things: angry, hungry, horny. Anything else will get your masculinity questioned. Being angry about an advertisement is one of those three things, so this doesn't even seem internally consistent with the meta.
[–]KROMExRainbow 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link
I mean, black males leave their children at a much higher rate than any other race. But if Gilette published an ad that said, "Hey, Black People, stop abandoning your children," do you think it'd be unreasonable for the majority of black people to be upset, regardless of whether they're actually leaving their families?
[–]Jake0024 -1 points0 points1 point 7 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link
But the ad wasn't singling out a race as being problematic or anything like that. It's literally just a company that makes men's products calling on men to hold each other to a higher standard. They weren't saying "hey men you're statistically more likely to be assholes than women so stop being such pieces of shit." It's literally just hey, you can do better. Do you disagree?
[–]locoloic 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
You might want to check the ratios of races portrayed exhibiting bad behavior, vs those exhibiting good behaviors in the advert.
[–]Jake0024 -1 points0 points1 point 7 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
So you don't think the ad was targeting men... you think it was targeting white men? And (presumably) all white men?
[–]locoloic 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
I think someone did a count, and it was something like 80-90% white guys acting badly.
Again, if you flip that over and portrayed 80% black men exhibiting bad behavior, and then at the end a few clips of white guys stepping in and showing the black men the errors of their ways, there would likely be uproar.
[–]Jake0024 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Yeah, obviously. So they wanted to avoid that. That didn't answer my question though.
[–]locoloic 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
You’ve answered your own question:
You concede that flipping the races of the current advert around would cause outrage as it would appear to be directed at PoC. So, you can’t flip it back to as it is now and then argue there isn’t a bias.
Either there is, or there isn’t.
[–]Jake0024 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Yes, there's a bias against creating outrage among groups who might be overly sensitive to that sort of message.
Apparently there's no avoiding that entirely, though
[–]KROMExRainbow 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
It was singling out a gender as being problematic. I mean, obviously every man can do better. But so can everyone, so to only portray men as being bad in the advert shows Gilette was singling out men.
But also, I'm not a rapist, for example. And if one person comes up to me and says, "Hey man, don't rape people!" I'll be like, "Yeah, right on! People shouldn't rape people." But then it happens again, and you're like, "Yeah, I know. I definitely agree with you though!"
Eventually, after constantly having people yell in your face, "Hey, MEN, stop being rapists!" you just get to a point where you're like, "Why the fuck is everyone coming up to me and telling me not to rape people? I don't rape people. I don't need to hear this and frankly it's offensive that you think I do."
Now I understand that Gilette's commercial isn't straight up talking about rape, but in general, media is constantly telling men who they should be and what they shouldn't be doing, and eventually you just grow tired of it and insulted by it.
[–]Jake0024 -1 points0 points1 point 7 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link
It sounds like you're pretty worked up about unnecessarily being told not to rape people.
Overall, do you feel more bothered by that, or by the stats on how many men are raping people? Like just proportionally, which one bothers you more?
Genuinely curious. To make an analogy... I think smoking is pretty bad for people. I don't smoke, and I've never smoked. But I don't get upset when I see an anti-smoking advertisement. I don't think "gosh, why the fuck is everyone coming up to me and telling me not to smoke?" I just think "oh yeah, that's a good idea. Smoking is pretty bad for people."
In fact, I think it's a pretty good idea to have those advertisements, because I know lots of other people do smoke (or may start smoking) and I'd rather they didn't because I think smoking is pretty bad for people. Of the two, I get way more upset at the effects of actually smoking (death, etc) than I do at being unnecessarily told that I shouldn't smoke (which doesn't harm anyone).
And in this case, Gillette is a company that sells men's products, and it's true that men do most of the raping, so even though the ad wasn't specifically about raping, it makes sense that Gillette would write the ad that way.
[–]NecroHexr 106 points107 points108 points 7 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link
How tf did you manage to deep fry a screenshot
[–]swiet[S] 61 points62 points63 points 7 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
Coloured Filters, so it doesn't look plain :)
[–]macaryl95 48 points49 points50 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Found the gay
Edit: We love you
[–]ventuspilot 6 points7 points8 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Now kiss!
[–]macaryl95 4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Kiss and make out?
[–]NaturalisticPhallacy 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
It's because you used JPEG (photograph) compression on text.
Use GIF, PNG, or SVG.
[–]Moroax 4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
It is certainly fried, but it's a light fry my friend.
[–]Jabroni_Balogni 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
His screen might have been dirty
[–]Sad_Capybara 75 points76 points77 points 7 years ago (17 children) | Copy Link
I've been mad about this exact same thing for so long but I was just too retarded to put it into word effectively.
[–][deleted] 12 points13 points14 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Lol same. I have come off as really ignorant a few times but it is just that I couldn't verbalize this properly.
[+]LeonardoDaTiddies -10 points-9 points-8 points 7 years ago (15 children) | Copy Link
Genuinely curious: What about the Gillette ad would be offensive to guys that don't condone bullying or sexual harassment but do support teaching their kids positive affirmation (the dad with the little girl)?
[–]Sad_Capybara 22 points23 points24 points 7 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link
Just the fact that it was targetted at the negative aspects of men. It felt like we were being lectured. Imagine if an ad targetted the negative statistics regarding people of colour? Would they not have the right to be offended?
[+]LeonardoDaTiddies -8 points-7 points-6 points 7 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link
Thank you for your response. I can understand that as an initial reaction but I don't think the "negative statistics regarding people of color" is a good parallel because there is not necessarily as much of a universal culture for the majority of all people of color, especially since people of color can include so many different cultures. Most of the negative behavior that might be reflected in statistics is probably more tied to socioeconomic status. Also, I don't recall any specific statistics in the Gillette commercial - just depictions of negative behaviors that historically get chalked up to "boys will be boys" or "man up" mentalities.
I think a better parallel would be one that only showed the negative cultural elements of women. For example, bullying (which may be more verbal and looks-oriented than physical for women vs men), maybe physical abuse toward male significant others that gets laughed off, shaming other women for not taking on traditional female roles (e.g. women who elect not to have children, who choose to be career professionals, etc), maybe reinforcing toxic masculine behaviors (e.g. mocking a guy who doesn't know how to change a tire as being "not a man"), etc.
[–]Sad_Capybara 13 points14 points15 points 7 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link
Honestly I think it is a good parallel. They are both things that you're born into, both things that you can't control. The negative aspects come from society and stereotypes in both cases. Excuse my crudeness, but if an ad was made about black people telling them to "stop selling drugs" or something else, obviously many people would be offended. And they would have the right to be offended.
The problem here is that the ad targetted men with the message "stop harassing women". And when men got offended, they were told they were part of the problem. They were told they had no reason, no right to be offended.
And yes, if an ad like this targetted women, they would also be outraged. This is proven because women get angry whenever the hypothetical concept of "toxic femininity" is brought up. The difference is that the outrage would be supported by feminists, as well as mainstream media. The ad would be considered discriminatory. But since the real one was targetted at men, it's absolutely fine. This is the double standard. This is the problem.
[–]LeonardoDaTiddies -5 points-4 points-3 points 7 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
I suppose we will have to agree to disagree. Plenty of white, hispanic, and asian people sell drugs and commit crimes, live in broken families, (and every other negative stereotype you can apply to black people in America). It's not like the Gillette ad included smoking meth in a trailer park as part of toxic masculinity.
I understand your initial reaction; I do disagree with it but I get that interpretations are personal and subjective. For me, the ad was about "being better" or helping others be less shitty. As someone who has never harassed women and has stood up to bullies as a kid, it never occurred to me that the ad would be directed at me or any of the countless guys like me.
Thanks for engaging in dialogue!
[–]Sad_Capybara 6 points7 points8 points 7 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
The point is, despite the initial reaction, why are men told they are in the wrong to be offended? Why are they told they are part of the problem when they are offended? Why are white men the only group that isn't allowed to be offended by discrimination towards them?
[–]LeonardoDaTiddies 3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I can't really say why men are being told they are in the wrong to be offended. I don't hold that position. My position is, "why would you be offended by a commercial that suggests that bullying and sexual harassment is bad and positive affirmation of children is good, that shows a positive scene of a father and daughter?"
That is where you and I had a disconnect - my understanding is that you interpret it as saying all men are bad guys.
I saw it as saying some elements of male culture are shitty and we (generally) should do more improve it.
[–]GregLouganus 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
I think because deep down, groups that are offended subconsciously know that their outrage is at least somewhat manufactured.
[–]Sad_Capybara 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
All groups, or just men? Do minorities have no right to be offended by discrimination?
[–]GregLouganus 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
All groups
The message is "men need to do better". It's classifying them all as because they're men. It's textbook sexism.
[–]alphamalejackhammer 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Well it’s kind of shedding light that some men exhibit behaviors that lead to sexual abuse and creepiness... which no one would argue with.
Then it’s pivoting and saying, MEN. MEN AS A WHOLE. Your gender is fucked up. Fix it. It’s your responsibility.
To a lot of us, it’s asinine to blame or assign responsibility that we have no control over. I’m not at fault for being a man because a few are really fucking shitty and mistreat women.
Just like it’s not a group of peaceful Muslims’ fault when ISIS bombs a church.
It’s identity politics. Don’t tell me that I’m living my life wrong, advertisement from Fortune 500 company
[–]LeonardoDaTiddies 3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
That would explain the disconnect between me - someone who did not find it at all offensive - and someone who did find it offensive: I did not interpret it as saying all men are toxic assholes.
To me, it was about urging men to take more of a stand against those toxic elements of male culture. Don't be a silent bystander when your buddy harasses a woman on the street. Don't act like a bunch of kids ganging up on a single kid is okay because "it will toughen him up." Don't think it's "gay" or a "bitch move" to spend time with your daughter giving her positive affirmations.
From my perspective, the advertisement is only telling you that you are living your life wrong if you condone bullying, harassment, and think a father having a positive interaction with his daughter is a bad thing.
I now better understand why some men might be offended because that interpretation never occurred to me. If the ad applied to me (someone who has stood up to bullies, someone who doesn't harass women, etc.) - it would only be to say, "Are you being a positive actor in those situations?" It's a rhetorical question, but I feel like I can honestly answer, "Yes." I would have thought most men would also answer yes, but might realize there was some minor foible they could improve on.
"Damn; I remember when Bobby and the guys were drunk and we pelted those poor chicks on the beach with beads and yelled at them to show their tits. That was shitty and I [edit: would] be livid if someone did that to my sister or wife."
"Shit; when Gus said he was learning how to braid his daughter's hair I called him a fag and said that's what he has a wife for."
[–]alphamalejackhammer 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link
I’ve struggled with this ad myself. About 45% of me totally agrees with you, that it’s not offensive to me. I think it’s just a couple different interpretations that we’re hearing- saying the ad is either saying:
1) men are toxic 2) men are toxic and need to be better (and encourage others to be better) 3) men are fine but men commit sexual assault sometimes and is it is wrong & wont be tolerated
I’m probably simplifying and not considering all takes, but #3 is what I imagine you see it like.
I see it as more #2, and that’s why it rubs me the wrong way.
I can’t really even put it into words.. because I do think we all have a responsibility to stop sexual assault and unlawful, even creepy behavior playing out. I just don’t like an advertisement (a for-profit one as well) telling me I should change my behavior. It’s not their place. It’s my decision to purchase whatever razor I want and I don’t like getting lectured on my genders’ shortcomings as a way to get me to buy.
And on top of that, I shouldn’t be told to change my perspective just because a few people that happen to share a gender with me are rapists and sex offenders
[–]PandaSixx 62 points63 points64 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
"You need to fight against toxic masculinity by talking about your feelings........ok but not like that though."
[–]Intellipus 58 points59 points60 points 7 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
I couldn't count the number of times I've seen men should "man up" when that Gilette thing happened.
Tough sell. :/
[–][deleted] 16 points17 points18 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Ironically the Gillette ad is itself an appeal to traditional gender roles. Men have always been told to police other men, protect women etc. The difference is that they used to be afforded respect and honor for their sacrifices.
A truly subversive ad would have had women taking responsibility, policing bad behavior by other women, protecting men etc.
[–]Greg_W_Allan 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
There is no protective instinct towards men among women unless it involves somebody close to them.
[–]Uintahwolf -5 points-4 points-3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Well men cant really police other men if they're told that what they and their friends are doing is just "boys being boys" or just "man stuff".
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 62 points63 points64 points 7 years ago (25 children) | Copy Link
I'm not sure why 'straight' was included there. The commercial didn't make exceptions for gay men; they have every right to be just offended by the commercial as straight men, and when they take issue with that commercial specifically, they are likely to recieve the same resistance.
[–]JaxJags904 53 points54 points55 points 7 years ago (16 children) | Copy Link
The commercial didnt you’re right, but the LGBTQ people, including white men, are seen differently than straight white men
[–]BitsAndBobs304 32 points33 points34 points 7 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link
Actually lgbtq and feminists have recently dropped alliance with gay men , they are no longer considered discriminated, they are now considered priviliged, along with straight men, no more winners of oppression Olympics, they are now part of oppressor establishment
[–]macaryl95 30 points31 points32 points 7 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link
Fuck... When did I become a chauvinist misogynist privileged manspreading pig?
[–]codeki 28 points29 points30 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
As soon as they burned through all the sympathy you guys had, you were disposable.
Welcome to the Nazi Party. As you may be able to see, we now encompass everyone to the right of Mao. We have snacks on the table in the middle of the hall, but please watch out for Commies with bike-locks. We kick them out, but they keep sneaking back in.
[–]macaryl95 13 points14 points15 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
You're quirky and weird. This sure beats being an asshole by default in the eyes of people who hate me for being me.
[–]BitsAndBobs304 6 points7 points8 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Some non-terfs have even started discretely dropping transexuals support, although i dont recall if they now hate ftm for betraying womanhood and joining the oppressors or mtf because they are still priviliged men in some way
[–]macaryl95 6 points7 points8 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
How can either of those groups be privileged? I mean I guess I'm glad feminism is only focusing on women, as it began, but to not support others as a human being is sad.
[–]PinkWhiteAndBlue 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
That's literally what a terf is :v
[–]NaturalisticPhallacy 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
As soon as you took that dick out of your preferred orifice.
[–]macaryl95 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Well put it back in please?
[–]minitntman1 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Probably when gays thought they were disgusting people that they rather get fucked up the ass, than pay out the ass for child support /s
[–]macaryl95 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Oh, the age-old dilemma. Gays actually do want kids but they don't wanna sacrifice their bodies to birth them. If not for all the closets in this world, my race would have died out as soon as we began.
[–]PixelPete85 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Privilege is a spectrum clearly. Being white and male gives you some, being gay takes some away. It's not all or nothing.
[–]bhullj11 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
They probably got sick of gay guys standing up for themselves not wanting to be a token gbf and not being able to use their tits to get discounts to get into gay bars/clubs.
[–]Halafax 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Actually lgbtq and feminists have recently dropped alliance with gay men ,
Nah, gay men just dropped into the "we'll claim them when it's convienent, and attack them when it's convienent" category. The progressive/intersectional stack treats anyone that isn't winning the victimhood olympics like this.
All they know how to do is hate, blame someone else, and expect that hated person to support them.
Yeah that's probabaly why so many LGBTQ groups have come out hard against all the violence against gay men that has been appearing in the world news recently, in particularly that college man who was killed and the words (paraphrasing but I'm pretty sure this was what was said) "He was gay" written on the wall near where he was killed. Written in blood supposedly but who knows.
Why lie about stuff you clearly have no idea about? To get upvotes? To seem educated or something? Stop spreading ignorant information, because clearly people believe you, and it's just making things worse.
[–]Arqium 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
As you can see in the comercial, the black guy had the moral superiority over the withe guy two times
[–]cakesalie22 points 7 years ago* [recovered] (5 children) | Copy Link
Gay guy here chiming in to say how much I despised that ad and the portrayals of men within. You're correct in that I have met the same resistance when calling out the blatant man-hating on display, either in this ad or elsewhere. I also see a split in the gay "community" between those gay men who have bought into the whole "my identity defines me" and "straight men are toxic" crowd and guys like myself that reject all that nonsense. As mentioned above, guys like me are no longer seen as oppressed (because frankly, we're not) so we're just full-blown Nazi now for not agreeing with a compete authoritarian intersectional ideology.
Edit: spelling
[–]tourguidebernie 13 points14 points15 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Gay gay here
That's like super-gay right?
[–]mrstickman 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
He's double-gay.
[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Thanks for sharing your perspective.
[–]Quixotic_Ignoramus 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Woah, wait a minute! You’re thinking for yourself AND forming your own opinions?! Take noise somewhere else you monster! We don’t need any of that individuality here.
[–]tallwheel 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
You're right that most of the commercial can apply to gay men as well. However, there are parts of the commercial which are specifically targeting heterosexual men such as the part where a man attempts to pick up a woman on the street, or the part where the man tells the girl to smile when he takes her picture. (Though for the second example the man could actually be gay for all we know, but it is obvious that the people who made the commercial intended him to be a straight man who is sexualizing her in a condescending way.)
The commercial does certainy seem to frame heteroexual men as the primary problem, an white men at that after their edit.
One could say "Hey, the guy going after the girl is bi", but ye, the trope seems to be that it is straigh guy who are the problem.
[–]matrix2002 12 points13 points14 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Many have pointed out the hypocrisy of this, but also it illustrates the often underdeveloped ability of men to know how to understand their complex emotions.
The older I get, the more I realize that the most emotionally stable people I know are that way because they know that life isn't all happiness.
They allow themselves to be angry, sad, happy, frustrated or whatever so that they understand the emotion on where it came from.
Only once when you understand the emotion can you evaluate it.
Men are often not even allowed to HAVE any emotions so they can't even get to the stage where they understand them to evaluate them.
It's definitely like making someone guilty before knowing the facts of the case.
And most men are very good at pushing down their emotions. Really, a lot of society likes it this way.
I hate to be "that guy", but it makes it easier to control you when you don't understand your emotions. Easier to manipulate.
If you get pissed off every time someone mentions your ex-wife, then it's easy to use that information against you.
It's in women's selfish short term interests to keep adult men emotionally stunted.
Long term, it's not good for anyone.
It's insanely frustrating to me to see men villainized before they even do anything wrong.
If you make men work the hardest and get the least emotional support for their contributions to the family, then a few of them go off the deep end and get violent.
I would prefer we focus on preventing violence by being more supportive of men and their emotions BEFORE they feel desperate and lash out.
If we want to talk about unhealthy versions of the ideal man in media, then it's all over the place. Men need to be: fit, rich, smart, successful, funny, dress well, emotionally supportive, a giving lover, tall, handsome, outgoing, happy, and socially comfortable.
Talk about unrealistic expectations.
[–]Uintahwolf 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Yeah the expectations society places on us could be called "toxic" in nature. I wonder what else could be described as such
[–][deleted] 16 points17 points18 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
The thing two things I find most offensive about the add are:
1 - It's preachy just to sell shit on TV. I mean seriously Gillette, why'd you go to all this trouble when you can simply go fuck yourself?
2 - Gillette has been selling the same razors to women, but doubling the price for decades. Hello pot, have you met kettle?
[–][deleted] 25 points26 points27 points 7 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
I wasn't offended by the commercial, I thought it a shit way to get the message across with the generalizations. With that being said, I explained on a friends post why I think people were offended and I got tons of "oh, honey please don't be that guy" replies.
It's a fucking joke how hypocritical those women(and some "men") were being trying to tell me I'm wrong.
[–]GuitarCFD 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
I thought it a shit way to get the message across with the generalizations.
So I'm not super familiar with the commercial, I've seen it once so I'd like some explanation of what people are finding offensive. I see real men standing up to douchebags and predators. I mean, that's what the real men in my life have always done. I think it's sad that the masses might think that this is a new idea, but it gives me hope that someone says, "you know what...there are really good guys out there and instead of just bashing men as a whole, let's call them out for doing the right thing"
Maybe that's just my naive take on it.
[–]tallwheel 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
IMO, a lot of the "douchebag" behavior shown in the commercial is just normal male behavior that has been wrongly stigmatized in our overly sensitized modern world. Boys wrastlin' in the yard? Oh no! Shut that down! A guy told a woman to smile? Oh heavens no, how will she cope? A guy who looks like a fucking model tries to approach an attractive woman on the street? Oh god no. Totally not cool, bro.
So, the issues are really multi-layered IMO. Besides the fact that it can easily be seen as calling out men as a group, IMO a lot of the male behavior depicted isn't even bad... in fact it's pretty healthy.
(I know a lot of men who have taken issue with my opinions on the male behavior on this and other forums, and they are welcome to their opinion, but sorry, I just can't bring myself to see these behaviors as all that bad.)
[–]GuitarCFD 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Boys wrastlin' in the yard? Oh no! Shut that down!
We probably just have a difference of opinion here, but as a father of 3 boys...if they start fighting you don't just sit and watch and say, "boys will be boys". Kinda your job to break that shit up.
A guy who looks like a fucking model tries to approach an attractive woman on the street?
That one I agree with you on...not sure what they were trying to portray there, but it failed miserably. Simply approaching a woman to talk shouldn't be looked down on. If she waves you off and you continue that's when it's an issue.
A guy told a woman to smile?
like i said earlier, i think i've seen this commercial once and I don't remember that one.
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I haven't watched it since that day it came out. From what I recall I thought that their choice of words in context to what was seen on screen seemed to have an overly dark tone as if it's some type epidemic across the world.
But really outrage on the internet gets attention so it was blown out of proportion
[–]goat_nebula 9 points10 points11 points 7 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
It's at a point where people will try to shut down my arguments for other things simply for subscribing to a sub dedicated to men's rights and perspectives. Not even allowed to be part of a discussion on the topic without being shamed and slandered...
[–]Leoni0609 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Give em the ol’ Stich up. Subscribe to a women’s rights thread as well. Your username is vague enough to get away with it and Ta-Daaaaa you respect the rights of all.
However, someone will still be offended. It’s human nature to disagree, and people have realised that the victim always wins the power in the end (hear that rothschilds’?) And the squeaky wheel gets the oil. So now we have squeaky, offended wheels absolutely everywhere.
This is exactly why we have toxic people, emotionally manipulative people and spouses holding partners ‘emotionally hostage’. The victim always wins out in the end. We can’t ALL be victims.... 4.13am thoughts.....
[–]goat_nebula 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
It's no wonder my father always told me that I could either be a victor or a victim, and the choice was mine.
Shaming, lies and censorship are all they have. We beat them on the facts.
[–]Uintahwolf 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Anyone who has to go through your post history to try and figure out how to argue their point isnt worth your time bro. All they need to go off of is whatever your talking points are. They're just seeking to ad hominem you, make your argument not valid like you said. Fuck 'em.
[–]TheGreyGuyHari8 points 7 years ago [recovered] (2 children) | Copy Link
And how can we forget the "white men bad, black and colored men good" bullshit!
Fuck feminism! Fuck P&G!
[–]Uintahwolf -2 points-1 points0 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
The ad had "bad" POC in it.
How do you explain that?
[–]Morristron2099 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Did it? Because someone counted them and the closest thing is one black dad standing at a barbeque and I'm told that in later versions he is edited out.
[–]raven982 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
That is what happens when your wrap up everything in identify politics. It's "us vs them" nature causes you to become the very thing you claim to hate.
[–]nelsonbt9 points 7 years ago [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link
On one hand, men should be adults and should be busy with productive pursuits instead of complaining about an SJW company. Victim culture is an abomination and even though men are disproportionately blacklisted and otherwise harmed by it, it’s not something we should adopt, because it’s still wrong.
That said, we are getting to a point where the attacks on men and the institutionalized discrimination against them is having a societal effect. Suicide rates for men destroyed by courts, for example. It’s a persistent attack, and it’s normalized, and it’s a moral imperative to defend ourselves. I can’t think of a better way than adopting the left’s own tactics. I mean that sadly: I can’t think of a better way.
Some men are bad. Some women are bad. “All men” didn’t start this war, but all men are being attacked with these policies. It’s a war we didn’t start. It was started by uncritical bigots. We have to reframe and resist. And as soon as possible, and as much as possible, take the high road and model values of moderation, maturity, success, merit, equality of opportunity, and fairness, and insist that others model these behaviours and values as well.
I'm a man and I'm not being attacked by society wanting to discuss toxic masculinity. In fact, I'm glad that society is having to discuss the things that make being a man so hard, like the idea that men have to do certain things in order to get approval from society, you know kind of like what you're arguing about in your last paragraph.
[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (27 children) | Copy Link
I’m out of the loop. What Gillette ad?
[–]timeslider 5 points6 points7 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=koPmuEyP3a0
[–]macaryl95 13 points14 points15 points 7 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link
Their "short film" they released a little while ago. You can find it on YouTube. The dislike ratio is atrocious, even with dislikes and comments being removed as we type. Got our boys fighting because they recognise propaganda when they see it. People will look back and compare this to the things we thought were fucked up in history. Unless we are silenced and it fades into obscurity. Do not let this happen.
[+]Uintahwolf -7 points-6 points-5 points 7 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link
Theres a lot of men, even in this sub, who think the ad was fine , and that the concept of what a "man" is, and how a "man" should act, is some outdated garbage that needs to be examined. Dont be thinking all "our boys" are with you, because we arent. It's not propaganda , it's a commercial trying to nail some liberal consumers.
[–]macaryl95 3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
Apparently you don't speak for everyone in this sub. I can look at the commercial and feel a bit of disappointment, not much more. Because I don't fit in as a man to begin with. But I understand its possible detriment toward other men. I also understand it could possibly threaten my existence as well, because even though I am not masculine in the slightest, it doesn't change my body. The video has 1.4 million dislikes, twice the likes. That means at least 1.4 million people feel something negative about this message in some way. Whether they are men's activists or not, the simple fact is the ad is polarising and clearly has some issues.
[–]Uintahwolf -4 points-3 points-2 points 7 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
You dont think it's possible that a large portion of those 1.4 million dislikes are just conservative bots that upvote/downvote whatever they're programmed to? Or Russian trolls seeking to spread division and anger? I wouldnt examine the number of dislikes something has and take that as some exact statistic.
[–]macaryl95 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Or you could alternatively read the countless comments beneath, many of which are highly personalised and detail personal beliefs and interpretations regarding the video. Many people claiming to actually have their downvotes removed, and to have seen it happen to others as well. A feature that YouTube has tried repeatedly to cover up and refuses to acknowledge. They did the exact same thing with Rewind 2018. Sometimes the craziest things turn out to actually be true. You can choose to think there's no way in the world another company can express anti-men's ideals, but don't do so without really looking at the evidence. Why just deny things when you're in a men's rights group? This is happening right now.
[–]Uintahwolf -1 points0 points1 point 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
So it's not possible some Russian trolls just faked a heartwarming story? Not possible in the slightest?
I'm not denying men dont like the video bro. I was saying you cant be using likes and dislikes as a metric.
EDIT: Just look at the botting and brigading that happens here and all over reddit.
Bots are very obvious. If you can't tell them apart from humans, I'm sorry. It really seems you're grasping at straws here. Russian trolls making automated but wildly differentiating comments? Come on really? It would be faster to just type all that stuff in yourself. What's your fascination with Russia anyway? They have better things to do than plan a civil uprising in regards to some shaving company. I've tried not to jump to conclusions, but you fell off an entire cliff.
[–]tallwheel 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Bots and trolls seem to be the go-to explanation whenever someone sees a large number of people voicing an opinion they don't agree with, or can't believe a large number of people are espousing. Of course bots and trolls are real things on the Internet today, but I find it a tad bit too convenient when someone sees something they disagree with and right away says "Hmm. Must just be bots."
At least you could have gone with "brigading". I actually find that to be a more likely explanation, but at least in the case of brigading you are still talking about real people with real opinions, who felt the need to go to the video and downvote it. (And I'm pretty sure the Gillette ad was actually brigaded from both sides. There was a sudden uptick one day of likes shortly after it went viral, which was probably people from feminist or SJW forums who heard about the controversy there.)
[–]DownrightCaterpillar 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
It's trying to "nail" some cucks. There's literally no reason to side with a commercial that goes out of its way to create many inaccurate portrayals of men. Personally I had no emotional response when watching it, I wasn't offended, but at the same time it's quite easy to see why the commercial is harmful to the public image of men.
[–]Uintahwolf -1 points0 points1 point 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Guarentee there are some cucks out there who are some hyper masculine , lifted truck driving, Coors drinking, Confederate flag tattoo mother fuckers. The commercial wasnt reaching out to "cucks".
Too bad cucks are the only people who will actually listen to Gillette's message. Non-cucks won't be fooled and will tell the ad to fuck off.
[–]codeki16 points 7 years ago [recovered] (14 children) | Copy Link
Gillette released an advertisement that basically blames men for everything, and especially white men.
[+][deleted] -10 points-9 points-8 points 7 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link
The fact that this is the takeaway for you is probably why people don't take the outrage seriously
It's like "don't sexually or physically assault people dudes", and the MRA loses their shit
[–]Soulless35 8 points9 points10 points 7 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
So should we go around telling women not to molest children? Or not to abuse their spouses? No, because anyone with common sense knows this and anyone who is going to do these things won't be stopped by being told "hey, stop that" so you're essentially just insinuating that the people you're telling not to do it need to be told not to because otherwise they would.
Not just MRA's who didn't like the ad, plenty of men and women didn't like the ad who aren't MRA's.
[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point 7 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
I mean, why not. If you can find a wholesome message and put it in an ad, go for it
And I'm not defending it as a goo dad, but getting offended by it is a completely different thing that just saying it's a shitty ad
[–]Soulless355 points 7 years ago [recovered] (3 children) | Copy Link
a wholesome ad that encourages men
Not a difficult thing to make. Pretty straight forward what's encouraging and what isn't. It's offensive because it insinuates that the default mentality for men is a scumbag mentality, which just isn't true. It's also a shitty ad.
[–][deleted] -2 points-1 points0 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
the default mentality for men is a scumbag mentality
No, it has a whole bunch of wholesome men out there like crews acting as good examples
Being offended by this is extremely thin skinned, much like other similar examples of outrage culture from feminists and other groups
It's a gross over reaction
[–]Profligate-Prophet 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I am not offended by the gillete ad. I am offended at the constant societal projection telling me i am a toxic white male. I just get so tired of it every fucking day. All the commercials growing up as a child. To me the gillette ad is a symbol of the culture I grew up in and am disgusted with. As with all the other symbols thrown in my face. And you wonder why 31% of working age men have just given up on work.
I remember watching a video about how many anti-male comerciald there were in the past 30 years. And there was a sociologist who has been counting them and recording how many he saw that didnt portray the man in a positive light. The number waa absolutely absurd. It was something like 98% were negative. I wish I could find the source for you so if anybody has it that would be nice.
[–]theninja94 5 points6 points7 points 7 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
The fact that ads telling Jews to not be rapists or greedy is probably why you guys aren’t taken seriously.
It’s like “dont rape people or be greedy” and you guys get scared.
[–]Uintahwolf -2 points-1 points0 points 7 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
Kinda weird how you had to call him a jew and make some cock sucking nazi sounding comparison. Cant help but think the commercial was definitely directed to you.
[–]theninja94 5 points6 points7 points 7 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
I didn’t say he was Jewish, it was a menkampf(r/menkampf)
You replace “men” with “jew” and see if it sounds okay
If it sounds okay to you when it’s men, but not jew, you’re doing something wrong.
[–]sneakpeekbot 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Here's a sneak peek of /r/menkampf using the top posts of the year!
#1: Cancel Jewish People | 65 comments #2: All Jews are Trash | 31 comments #3: Hans Muller dishing out truths | 115 comments
I'm a bot, beep boop | Downvote to remove | Contact me | Info | Opt-out
[–]Uintahwolf -2 points-1 points0 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
The ad is saying dont be a shitty man. Let'st menkampf that, using your previous words with a little bit of change.
Your words exactly: "The fact that ads telling Jews to not be rapists or greedy is probably why you guys aren’t taken seriously.
It’s like “dont rape people or be greedy” and you guys get scared."
Let's switch it up just a little: "The fact that ads telling jews not to be shitty Jews is probabaly why you guys arent taken seriously
It's like "don't be shitty" and you guys get scared.
Weird how all of a sudden the context went from "all Jews are rapists and greedy and they shouldnt be" , to "there are Jews, and they should try to not be shitty". It's almost like the argument is much more nuanced than you're making it out to be, and the commercial wasnt saying all men are shitty. What about the kid getting bullied in the commercial ? You think they were implying he was a rapist ?
[–]tallwheel 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
That doesn't fix anything. In what world is anyone given a pass for implying Jews are shitty? I have no idea why you and the other person who replied thinks this makes any difference. You apparently saw "rape" and "greedy" and focused on that. It doesn't even matter what words you use as long as the implications being made toward the group are negative.
[–]theninja94 -1 points0 points1 point 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
You make a good point. Not really a rebuttal I can come up with.
[–][deleted] 8 points9 points10 points 7 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link
Reeee....patriarchy.... reee unfair wage gap... reeee I’ve been raped by men stating their feelings... reeee
[–]Profligate-Prophet -1 points0 points1 point 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Exactly! every time i have an emotion i just stare.
Lmao. Damn autocorrect.
[–]Passthecranberries 3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Just saw the ad for the first time...wow. I love reading the comment section, amidst comment deletion and censorship, people (not just men) are rising up to show this company that they done fucked up.
I’ve never boycotted a company irl, congratulations Gillette!
[–]Moon_Glade 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Hello fellow reddit Is fun user
[–]YeOldeVertiformCity 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I think that I am logically consistent in my reaction to the Gillette ad.
1) I personally didn’t like it. That is something that I use when I make my own decisions about how I spend my money. So if I see an ad for something that doesn’t appeal to me then I don’t buy it.
This doesn’t mean that I get upset and try to deny others from spending money on it.
2) If something that I used to like changes into something that I don’t like then I will explain why I don’t like it any more in the hope it will change back.
this is different than “outrage” where people demand that things change because it’s offensive
2) There are people who get outraged. And those people are hypocrites for their selective use of outrage. For example, there are people who claim to be for “equality” but they only direct their outrage for or against certain groups.
I personally do not like outrage culture, so I would rather there wasn’t any outrage at all. But if people are outrage warriors, then I want them to apply their outrage equally or admit that they don’t believe in equality at all.
[–]Tyko_3 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link
I think what they fail to see is the fact that the words they are using omit the fact that it is not ALL men. You cannot go around saying "men do this" and then assume everyone will know you don't literally mean "ALL men". The danger of this is that with time, it will internalize. Generalizing is a dangerous thing and words have power. So when a man says they are offended by the Gillet add is because of the language used. it normalizes men being assholes in the eyes of women. This isn't just a woman who got cheated on by her boyfriend telling her friends "men are assholes" these are institutions with money and power in the media that are continuing to say men are a certain way. It is irresponsible. Just as irresponsible as saying it about women, or black men or hispanics or whatever else yo can think of.
In fact. If Gillette really cared for change and wanted to make this a positive ad campaign, the message would have been focused on the men who DO good. Make them feel recognized for not being the jerks. Say things like "In these trying times you have remained a father, a son, a husband" show them respecting their wives, teaching their boys discipline. Make them feel like GOOD MEN. Instead they went with "Y'all can do better y'know! Look at this jerk here. Look at this other asshole"
[–]DeepFriedDoubleEE 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Because it's comedy that "punches up" at the privileged and empowered patriarchy. So that means that it's fair and acceptable to make straight men the butt of your jokes. In fact, it's beyond fair because in making fun of straight men (bonus points if they're white) you're actually encouraging others to attack and destroy the oppression, misogyny, and hate perpetrated by all men. #StayWoke #MeToo #KillAllMen #TheFutureIsFemale
Edit: I wrote as if I was responding directly to the final question in the picture, not the post title or any other comments.
[–]J2501 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
'PRISM should only bother you if you have something to hide.'
'Prejudice against Muslims should only bother you if you are a terrorist.'
I wonder how many liberal feminists would agree with statements like that?
[–]dredawg1 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
So many fucking cunts in this world.
[–]Melohdy 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
☣️
[–]neightdog 3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Its because men are all 400 years old and have been oppressive the entire time
[–]OilyB 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Why? Because women (and lots of men) still consider men to be the strongest sex. They claim equality with their brain but 8n their instinct they expect men to be more resilient and women more delicate.
Hence - woman complaining: respect and believe Man complaining: derision, "man up!" Weak men anger women.
Now back to the Gilette ad: fuck everybody, resist the ad and resist the ideas related to it. Nobody will guard is, nobody will protect us. We must be our own Pretorian Guard.
The ad is literally agreeing with your points, and saying that we shouldnt be doing the whole "man up" thing, and dehumanizing men who arent "strong manly men".
It's weird that you can clearly see what they mean by toxic masculinity, and yet feel like we should just continue on with how things are.
[–]Emberwatch 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Im not offended by Gillette.
Am I threatened? Yes. I know why they pushed that ad. I know precisely what it means. Enslavement and control.
But am I offended? No. Instead I am grateful.
Its like a sniper in the bushes, standing up.
Now I can see who my enemy is.
Thank you Gillette for revealing yourself.
[–]Emberwatch 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Not in an active sense. Not in an organized "how do we best dominate the world sort of way." Its a war of ideologies, not people. Still a war tho.
[–]Uintahwolf 3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
You think Gillette is seeking to enslave and control men?
"I see who my enemy is." Man it's a goddamn commercial for shitty razors.
[–]Kid_Dragneel 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
“Down with toxic masculinity, men are allowed to have feelings!” Me: “I feel offended and targeted by the ad” (those same women) “lol man up it’s just an ad, poor baby upset by a commercial! LOL”
Its good to see posts like this where open minded people see through the bs the indoctrinated feminists spew. I think society in general is finally waking up to the evil of this group.
[–]omegaphallic 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Those that mock those offended by the as only keep the whole thing going ironically.
[–]SIothhhhhhhhhhhh 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
what was the Gillette ad?
[–]BudnamedSpud 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Bring back the 1960 folger adds.... Thats what I say
[–]icexprincess 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
lmao you know what's REALLY funny?
in Russia, reebok released an "empowering" ad to women that was like, "stop craving male approval … ride their faces instead!"
meanwhile, men get condescended to.
cmon y'all, you can do better, stop treating us like sexual objects and respect us … by letting us treat you like sexual objects!
[–]JuicyPro 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Honestly unpopularopinion is becoming my favorite subreddit.
[–]Anonfamous 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I dunno but there was a Gillette commercial years ago that bothered me more than this.
It was like several short clips of the things a man's face will endure over a lifetime. Kisses, rain, sun, wind, and the last one was like "three well deserved slaps," and then it shows this guy taking said slaps like at the ends of dates and one by his wife..... Wait wtf?!
Like imagine if I was selling fucking eyeliner and I was like it'll mask three deserved black eyes and then showed three quick clips of some chick getting fuckin decked.
[–]OfDogsandRoses 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I've never agreed with anything more.
Men are not stones!!
[–]DJ-Roukan 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
No Charlie Brown, I won't pull the football out this time, honest.
Yea I've had to take 200mg of Seroquel for the last 6 years because apparently me having emotions is wrong. I've only cried 3 times in that period, that is it, can't remember the last time I laughed out loud.
[–]JackFisherBooks 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
We're all human, last I checked. Human beings are emotional creatures. We feel sadness, sorrow, loss, despair, anger, outrage, and a whole host of other things that we can't put into words. There's a healthy way to deal with emotions and there's an unhealthy way. And when an entire group of people are deemed "toxic" by default, there's no healthy way to deal with it. And people are still surprised when it causes resentment and frustration?
[–]OnTheSlope 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
When one black guy on tv smokes crack that tv show is saying all blacks smoke crack, but say men need to do better and it's only talking about a small percentage.
[–]RyanStrainMusic 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
But everyone gets made fun of by someone for their beliefs. This post insinuates that the men who are offended by this ad are being made fun of more than anyone else, but everyone's getting made fun of. Men, women, feminists, vegans, republicans, democrats, blacks, whites, catapult enthusiasts, etc. In this case, it's not out of place. It's expected, just like in every other facet of society. Just ignore it all.
[–]Whisper -1 points0 points1 point 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
OP, you are well-intentioned, but you have the wrong tack, here.
Everyone knows men have emotions. It's that no one who doesn't know that man personally gives a shit.
This is not some sort of special "sexism" in our culture, either. It's the simple fact that human beings (of both sexes) are biologically hardwired to think differently about men and women.
Attempting to persuade humans out of their instincts isn't going to work. Find an alternative strategy.
[–]wrenagade419 -3 points-2 points-1 points 7 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link
then their hypocrites for thinking people shouldn't be upset at other people who get offended when the suggestion is made that we can be better.
like someone says do the right thing, and you get offended.... you're just a bad fucking person
[–]theninja94 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
I don’t like being blamed for sexual offenders existing just because I have a dick. I’m supposed to do better? I haven’t done any of that.
Imagine telling LGBT they’re supposed to do better because some pedophiles are gay.
[–]Uintahwolf -3 points-2 points-1 points 7 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
Do you think its possible, at least once in your life, that you might have seen another man being a piece of shit, harassing a fellow man or harassing a woman, and you did nothing about it? If you went through public school, or have ever gone to a large concert or club in your life, you're telling me there was never a time where you probabaly could have said or done something ?
Isnt inaction , doing nothing, almost like you're encouraging something? Like if you're not telling someone "no that's bad" , and just look at them while they do the thing, do you think they'll understand that what they're doing is bad?
You dont think that its possible for you to "be better" or get your guy friends/family to not act like shit bags sometimes?
[–]theninja94 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Well my family loves calling each other out, but I guess you’re right that sometimes I do just ignore shit. But that’s because the dude’s bigger than me, and I don’t wanna get the shit kicked outta me.
[–]Uintahwolf 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
I mean I cant blame you, and totally have been in situations like that, but then you can see what the ad is saying.
Lmao I'd be lying if I said I've told off some yoked dudes at the gym when they're being creepy. It's hard to call people out, but all of us should be doing it more, men AND women.
[–]theninja94 -1 points0 points1 point 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
You are right. I remember rewatching the Gillette thing and going “Now that I think of it, it has a good message, but it’s not anything new.”
[–]Uintahwolf 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Oh I definitely think it was just a marketing ploy, but there had to be some sentiment behind it right? Like I've said elsewhere in here, I liked the message but I think it could have been a bit more nuanced and explained. Clearly, there was some miss communication, since a lot of men seem to think the commercial was saying "all white straight men act poorly and need to act better, unlike our upstanding men of color and varying sexuality" , despite the words "white" and "straight" never being used haha.
Also it's just some goddamn razors lmao. If my toilet paper brand had ads addressing the Armenian genocide, I would be totally on board, but also wondering why the fuck is my toilet paper getting all political out of the blue like this.
[–]Corsign 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Another example of trying to invalidate a mans feelings and logical conclusions. The left is turning into ignorance and celebrating victimhoods. They are letting emotions run the course and act like it’s a supreme intellectual discussion where no one can have opposing views. When a guy tries to express a rational view and someone from the other side is saying “you don’t understand, you’re wrong” lol straight up gaslighting and projecting.
[–]Bootleather -4 points-3 points-2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
This is stupid. Why am I supposed to feel bad about toxic men being portrayed as toxic?
This is not mens rights it's butthurt incels.
Be proud that you are NOT one of those men who feel 'threatened' by an advertisement saying that there are bad men out there.
[–][deleted] 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
[permanently deleted]
[–]Greg_W_Allan 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
You seem to abuse everybody everywhere you go. Consider yourself reported.
[+]tomba444 -9 points-8 points-7 points 7 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
The ad was fine. The point is that we should encourage men to not be sexually aggressive, violent, or judgmental, not that all men are characterized by these traits. This is a good message to promote and by no means targets all men generally. If y'all want men's rights to be taken seriously, you would appreciate that condemning objectively negative behavior is a good thing.
[–]Soulless35 8 points9 points10 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
how to encourage men without insinuating that they're all scumbags
[–]tomba444 -5 points-4 points-3 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
I have yet to hear a good argument that the Gillette ad insinuates that men are all scumbags.
[–]Soulless35 4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
All of the women empowerment things in media today. Show me 1 that shows bad women then being educated by good women. You can't find something like that because it insinuates that the average women is bad which is inaccurate. I have yet to hear a good argument is to why the gillete ad was a good way to help deal with "toxic masculinity"
Is feminism taken seriously because of its deft self-criticism?
[–]rosin-the-beau -4 points-3 points-2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Nobody ever mentions Islam.
[+]Smackdaddy122 -13 points-12 points-11 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
This sub is a cunt hair away from redpill lol
[–]Soulless35 7 points8 points9 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Men having emotions=red pill
[+]Uintahwolf -9 points-8 points-7 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Half a cunt hair, please let's be reasonable.
[+]Kendricktheory -14 points-13 points-12 points 7 years ago (21 children) | Copy Link
There are dudes in the video that are nice and dudes in the video that are assholes. I don't get how this would offend someone that isn't an asshole.
Like I see dudes that are assholes all the time, I know the commercial is talking about them because it's obvious from the context.
The ad was ridiculousand dumb but then again so is this post
[–]Soulless35 7 points8 points9 points 7 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link
Make a female version with mean women and nice women, see if the company doesn't get 5 times the backlash gillete did.
[–]Uintahwolf -1 points0 points1 point 7 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link
Theres toxic femininity too. A company should talk about it, and I guarantee a lot of women would appreciate their fellow women not treating them like trash if they dont adhere to specific guidelines that society has told them to have to follow to be a "real woman".
[–]Soulless35 3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
I know it's a thing. But I am entirely sure that no company will touch it with a 10 ft pole because the backlash would be way to much.
[–]Uintahwolf -1 points0 points1 point 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
So you understand toxic femininity and what exactly that means?
Do you think women should be more open to discussing it? That we definitely should be having commercials on it?
If yes, then why the hell shouldn't we be discussing toxic masculinity?
[–]Soulless35 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Except we aren't discussing toxic femininity. To mainstream media it doesn't exist.
Rather than avoiding my question, do you think you could answer?
Do you understand what toxic feminity is? Do you think it needs to be discussed and brought up more often?
If so, why shouldn't we be discussing toxic masculinity?
[–]Soulless35 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
We should discuss toxic femininity, if I didn't know what it was I wouldn't agree with you on it existing.
We should discuss toxic femininity but we aren't so, why should we discuss toxic masculinity? It should be all or nothing.
Even if "a lot of women" would agree with the ad, I guarantee the vast majority would feel attacked and complain immediately. The majority of women play for team woman. They have group solidarity and identity as women that men just don't have. Men, on the other hand, are largely fine to throw other men under the bus and say, 'All those other men are bad men. I'm one of the good ones.' That's precisely why ads like the Gillette ad even get made in the first place.
[–]whyisthisallowed1 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
It's scientifically proven women treat women much better than they treat men.
[+]Uintahwolf -8 points-7 points-6 points 7 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link
Because apparently a lot of dudes realized they ARE the assholes, and have had their entire identity of what makes them "men" flipped on it's back, with someone standing above them pointing a finger and saying "that's wrong". I can understand frustration , but for real if you arent a shitty dude , then clearly the commercial isnt talking about you. I've seen so many people say the commercial was all about straight white men, when it NEVER brought up sexual preference or race. It's clearly about masculinity in general, and that maybe what we've all been taught growing up might be some backwater religious honor society hick way of thinking.
[–]LettuceBeGrateful 8 points9 points10 points 7 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link
In a single comment, you said that this commercial is only for shitty dudes, and that it addresses "masculinity in general" which "we've all been taught."
So, are all men shitty dudes, or am I misinterpreting what you're saying? It seems like you've inadvertently validated criticism of the commercial.
[+]Uintahwolf -8 points-7 points-6 points 7 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link
You're not misinterpreting, you're setting up a strawman, but sure I'll assume you arent actually trying to call me a moron and are genuinely confused.
The commerical offended shitty men. The commercial was calling out to all men not to be shitty men. The commercial called out toxic masculinity, or in many shitty dudes opinions "straight white Male masculinity " apparently. Masculinity in general, the masculinity that is celebrated and approved of in many society's, is toxic masculinity. Things like : telling men to man up, thinking men shouldn't get kids in a divorce because they arent as caring as women, thinking that a man needs to fight or hes not a real man, men comparing each other to women in order to insult them, men being told they arent real men if they dont know how to fix their car or chop down a tree, men feeling like they have to do certain things in order to be a man, ect ... All that is a part of toxic masculinity, which is addressed in the commercial. The commercial wasnt telling the men , who understand they should be their own individual rather than try and be a "man" , to do better. It was telling the shitty men to do better.
[–]Corsign 6 points7 points8 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
In other news. A company tried to profit off of SJW sentiments. Back to the weather Tom!
I mean you're not wrong. I think there could have been a more.... nuanced approach.
And yet so many of my fellow men claim to understand that's what was happening, and yet still feel like their entire way of life is being threatened.
No the problem is people that aren’t men, want to try to tell the men how they feel and what they’re thinking. They are essentially trying to say “no man, I know better than you, you’re lying to yourself and others, you are a diseased mind, you are toxic because you mock Gillette” in a nutshell. Men don’t have to like the stupid fucking commercial, men don’t need to agree with the subtle subliminal bullshit companies are trying to capitalize on and profit off of. Stop trying to tell men how to think and feel people, seriously no one wants to be told what their intentions and motives are as if they’re some psychics of mass populations. Men are allowed to be angry, have opinions, use logic, have feelings and whatever else people that are trying to suppress as a form of revenge. Like this distract and divide bullshit is exactly working as intended and it’s the soft ass pussies that are trying to ruin it for everyone. There’s an attack on our liberties and people are worried about some made up toxic male shit that they really can’t control in the end.
[–]Soulless35 4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
100% guaranteed if there was a version of the ad with women doing ducked up shit and then a couple nice women then it would get 5x the backlash gillete did. Stop pretending the ad is so righteous, it's not.
[–]Uintahwolf 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
100% guarentee toxic feminity is a thing , and while there would be backlash, many women would be glad to have the conversation topic be brought up. Women, just like us men, are told to behave in certain ways or they arent being lady like, or they're not a "real woman" . A company should have a commercial for it. All of us need to be rethinking gender roles , and why exactly we still adhere to concepts of masculinity/femininity that have been the same for hundreds, if not thousands, of years.
It is a thing, never said it wasn't. But you won't see an ad about it. Anyone who dares bring up common flaws in women is pushing the patriarchy forward or whatever else.
[–]Uintahwolf 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Go speak to some female friends and ask them about this. I guarantee more women are receptive than angry.
[–]Soulless35 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I guarantee men would be receptive if you spoke to them individually as well. But when you make it a blanket statement to men it's different.
[–]LettuceBeGrateful 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
No personal insult or strawman intended. Scout's honor.
That being said...
The commercial was telling all men
and
The commercial wasnt telling the men , who understand they should be their own individual rather than try and be a "man" , to do better. It was telling the shitty men to do better.
Do you see how these two statements read as contradictory? Either the ad's target was all men, or it wasn't.
If it was targeting all men, then it's just as much as issue as if it targeted all women, all Muslims, all Jews, all black people, etc. If it wasn't targeting all men, then it comes across (at least to me) as soulless "rape is bad mmkay" pandering that won't solve anything or educate anybody.
The ad is either adversarial, or pointless. There are ways to reduce sexual violence without casting aspersions across large groups of people.
[+]Iagi -15 points-14 points-13 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
If this sub walked away thinking that the Gillette commercial was an attack on masculinity you’ve all missed the point. It was clearly a celebration of true masculinity. Instead of abusive and poor behaviours disguised as masculinity.
On top of that is not like every third post on this sub laughing at how someone else got offended? Let’s hold ourselves to not hypocrisy at the very least.
[–]DootDeeDootDeeDoo 12 points13 points14 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Okay, then good Muslims are responsible for stopping bad Muslims, good black people are responsible for stopping black criminals, good women are responsible for stopping bad women.
Because, you know, it makes sense to make the innocent responsible for the guilty.
Each community should be having standards and virtues that everyone should be seeking to uphold. The communities , the members in the communities, are responsible for exemplifying these virtues and encouraging members to do so as well, for the betterment of themselves and as the community as a whole. Good black people should be trying to better their communities, just like any good person should be doing. Good muslims should be encouraging reform, acceptance, and education in their communities, especially since men are the only ones with a voice in religion.
It's not trying to guilt the innocent, it's trying to encourage the innocent to fortify their current values and strengthen their communities.
[+]numb3red -13 points-12 points-11 points 7 years ago (32 children) | Copy Link
Okay, I used to be a big MRA and even trying to go back and look at the ad through that old mindset I can't figure out why people have a problem with it. It's literally saying "These actions are what toxic masculinity actually is, if you don't do these and call out people who do you're a real man and that's awesome." Women are calling out men who dislike this ad because it's impossible to figure out how good men can see it as attacking to them.
[–]DownrightCaterpillar 7 points8 points9 points 7 years ago (30 children) | Copy Link
It's an entire commercial dedicated to negative depictions of men. One bad guy is normal if it serves a marketing purpose, but this commercial targeted a massive swath of men, which looks like an attack on men. The only way a guy can be "good" is by calling out other men, which basically makes men the servants of insecure women. Also white guys are triggered because conspicuously all the bad guys are whites and the good guys are not, which is intentional and racist.
You're wrong to see the commercial as calling out bad behavior by men; some of the behavior is bad, but the scene where the two boys are wrestling and the dad separates them is idiotic. I am a small man, was a small kid, and still enjoyed wrestling matches with various bigger kids when I was really young. That is the problem, the commercial targeted masculinity in general even when it isn't "toxic."
[–]numb3red -1 points0 points1 point 7 years ago (29 children) | Copy Link
It's an entire commercial dedicated to negative depictions of men.
Yes. You see, the ad is about bad men, and bad things otherwise decent men do without realizing the harm. If the ad wasn't about that, there wouldn't be so many bad men in it; however, that's the entire point of the ad, so unsurprisingly that's what's in it.
but this commercial targeted a massive swath of men, which looks like an attack on men.
Well I'm glad you acknowledge that's what it can look like, rather than that being the intent. The truth is, there is a massive swath of men like this in the real world, and there's nothing wrong with pointing that out.
The only way a guy can be "good" is by calling out other men,
Inaction is an action. Allowing someone to get away with harassing someone else to avoid making waves isn't a good thing. Calling out bad actions and making them socially unacceptable is how this kind of shit gets erased.
which basically makes men the servants of insecure women.
What? How is getting harassed in public because you have an ass or getting put down in the workplace the fault of "insecure women?" How is being expected to do something good servitude?
Also white guys are triggered because conspicuously all the bad guys are whites and the good guys are not, which is intentional and racist.
I just went back and watched the ad again because this smelled like bullshit, There are multiple PoC "bad guys" and multiple white "good guys."
some of the behavior is bad, but the scene where the two boys are wrestling and the dad separates them is idiotic. I am a small man, was a small kid, and still enjoyed wrestling matches with various bigger kids when I was really young.
The kid on the bottom cried out in pain. Just because you enjoyed wrestling as a kid doesn't mean that in the very, almost hand-holdingly clear scenario in the ad it's okay. He's getting bullied, the bottom kid isn't having any fun.
That is the problem, the commercial targeted masculinity in general even when it isn't "toxic."
Show me one scene in the ad where the victim consented (oh no, I used the evil feminist word!) to what's happening.
[–]DownrightCaterpillar 5 points6 points7 points 7 years ago (15 children) | Copy Link
I'm not going to respond to all of it, but there's a few problems:
Inaction is an action. Allowing someone to get away with harassing someone else to avoid making waves isn't a good thing.
Anti-male social media campaigns, like #killallmen and #menaretrash are incredibly popular, yet no women-led group is calling them out. There's no reason for men to regulate bad male behavior if women aren't returning the favor. This is a double-standard that needs to end, bad behavior by women is much more tolerated by our society than bad behavior by men, as demonstrated by sentencing disparities for the same crime.
The truth is, there is a massive swath of men like this in the real world, and there's nothing wrong with pointing that out.
I'm not sure what "real world" you're referring to; if you looked at my post from a few weeks ago, you'll see that male criminals are less than 1% of the male population. It's bigoted to focus on them as if they are in any way representative of all men. It makes sense for an organization like the FBI to focus on male criminals, but it's extremely weird for Gillette to go out of their way to represent men as if horrible men are everywhere; they really aren't. You are flat-out wrong to claim there is a "massive swath of men like this." They are small in number.
How is getting harassed in public because you have an ass or getting put down in the workplace the fault of "insecure women?" How is being expected to do something good servitude?
Nobody said that being harassed is women's fault, stop making strawman arguments. I said that insecure women are creating the concept that a man can only be good if he criticizes bad male behavior. The ad is literally called "The Best Men Can Be" and then demonstrates men calling out men; therefore the best a man can be is a man who criticizes other men for behaving poorly.
The "best a man can be" is William Kyle Carpenter, who jumped on a grenade to save his comrades. The "best a man can be" is Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin, who literally went into outer space, not knowing the risks and knowing that if they died, it would be a painful death. The "best a man can be" is FDR, who led the US out of the Great Depression, and led the US through WWII successfully. Looking at men as a group and thinking that there is a "wide swath" of bad men is not a reasonable thought process, it's the product of an anxious, insecure, bigoted mind.
[–]numb3red -4 points-3 points-2 points 7 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link
Anti-male social media campaigns, like #killallmen and #menaretrash are incredibly popular, yet no women-led group is calling them out.
I don't agree with the methods of these campaigns, but I guarantee you can't demonstrate any real-world harm that's come of them. Violence against men isn't rising, it hasn't become less safe to live in the world as a male because of a feminist social media trend. As a matter of fact, a feminist got booted from an event for Tweeting "Kill all men."
There's no reason for men to regulate bad male behavior if women aren't returning the favor.
Bullshit. Always strive to be better, regardless of your gender.
This is a double-standard that needs to end, bad behavior by women is much more tolerated by our society than bad behavior by men, as demonstrated by sentencing disparities for the same crime.
This isn't really related to the ad, but feminists and leftists seek massive prison reform in the US. Feminists also want to undo the systemic gendered biases that lead to women winning the vast majority of custody disputes, as this comes from the idea that women must be "more nurturing" and men must be "rough and emotionally distant." Surprisingly, feminists know that these gender norms hurt men too and want to change them.
you'll see that male criminals are less than 1% of the male population.
Huh? Which of the "bad guy" acts in the Gillette ad realistically lead to criminal charges? No criminal statistics are going to reflect letting your child be a bully or talking over a woman in a business meeting. Completely irrelevant.
Nobody said that being harassed is women's fault, stop making strawman arguments.
Sorry to misrepresent you. "Insecure women are trying to make men their servants" is such a nonsensical, redpilled claim that I didn't even know how to interpret it.
I said that insecure women are creating the concept that a man can only be good if he criticizes bad male behavior. The ad is literally called "The Best Men Can Be" and then demonstrates men calling out men; therefore the best a man can be is a man who criticizes other men for behaving poorly.
You haven't disputed that calling out men doing bad things is good, nor do I understand why you'd want to, because it is good.
Where'd you get this insecure women thing from? This ad was probably made by mostly men, but even if it wasn't that doesn't somehow invalidate the message.
How is "men acting better and asking the same of their peers" in any way incompatible with the idea of "the best a man can be?" Also, that's mostly in there because it's still an ad trying to sell Gillette shaving products.
The "best a man can be" is William Kyle Carpenter, who jumped on a grenade to save his comrades.
Giving your life to save others is undeniably heroic, but getting into wars needlessly to even create a scenario where someone needs to die to save others is terrible and shouldn't be glorified.
The "best a man can be" is Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin, who literally went into outer space, not knowing the risks and knowing that if they died, it would be a painful death.
Astronauts are brave, how does that take away from the idea of pushing back against bad, socially prevalent actions?
Looking at men as a group and thinking that there is a "wide swath" of bad men is not a reasonable thought process, it's the product of an anxious, insecure, bigoted mind.
I thought you guys were all about "realism?" What kind of sheltered life are you living where you don't see men be creepy to women and bullying with children regularly? Do you play online games? Women get harassed all the time for existing, their mistakes are scrutinized harder than men's, the first response to them talking over voice chat is usually "oh my god it's a grill" or "make me a sandwich," when men can talk freely without dealing with the same shit. I have friends and coworkers, often well-meaning, who will mainly talk about women in their lives or that they see in public sexually, whereas they approach men as people. Trans women will testify that when they start passing as female, they get patronized much more often and listened to less. All this shit is real, and it's not uncommon.
[–]DownrightCaterpillar 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link
I guess I'll state my point again but more concisely: The ad is called "The Best Men Can Be," and it depicts men calling out annoying, obnoxious behavior by men. I don't dispute that this is good, I dispute that this is anywhere near the "best men can be." War heroes, astronauts, great leaders, scientists (like Alexander Fleming, who is the grandfather of antibiotics), these are the "best men can be." Some dude saying to another guy "hey, catcalling is uncool bro" is honestly a far cry from the "best men can be." It's good behavior but it's a very small thing to do.
This ad postulates that serving women's interests by calling out chauvinist behavior is the "best men can be." Any rational person can understand that the accomplishments of Alexander Fleming are far better for society than any individual guy who makes it a point to call out other guys. The idea that the anti-catcalling bro is anywhere close to the "best men can be" is just absurd. No man should hold up anti-catcalling bro as a role model.
[–]numb3red 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link
The ad is called "The Best Men Can Be," and it depicts men calling out annoying, obnoxious behavior by men. I don't dispute that this is good, I dispute that this is anywhere near the "best men can be."
You know what, I think we can agree on this. Gillette is a company with a slogan and a profit incentive; they made a good ad not because they care about social movements, but because they wanna keep people thinking about Gillette.
This ad postulates that serving women's interests by calling out chauvinist behavior is the "best men can be." Any rational person can understand that the accomplishments of Alexander Fleming are far better for society than any individual guy who makes it a point to call out other guys.
This is where you lose me. Firstly, you're still hung up on this "women's interests" thing. Not only does it serve the interests of everybody, women and men, but why do you keep pointing out that it helps women as though it's a sticking point? Secondly, why can't we have both medicine and positive social movements? It's like the "starving children in Africa" fallacy, one doesn't invalidate the other.
No man should hold up anti-catcalling bro as a role model.
This sentence perfectly encapsulates what I'm talking about above. Why not? Why can't a man willing to stand up to his friend for the sake of a stranger be a role model? It's not can easy thing to do, and you're allowed to have more than one role model.
[–]DownrightCaterpillar 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link
Firstly, you're still hung up on this "women's interests" thing. Not only does it serve the interests of everybody, women and men, but why do you keep pointing out that it helps women as though it's a sticking point?
Eliminating catcalling does not benefit men. And I say this as someone who was aggressively catcalled by gay men when I was 16; it's not a real problem. I was not bothered, in fact as an insecure young man it boosted my self-confidence. As an adult I would find it annoying, nothing more. There are a million problems just in the US, we can't solve them all at once, so we need to focus on the most important ones. Nobody dies, nobody is injured, nobody loses money, nothing significant happens as a result of catcalling. It is a non-problem compared to real issues, like PTSD and cancer.
As for helping women being a sticking point, it's a sticking point because I view men as being in a disadvantaged position compared to women. Expecting men to take special actions to solve relatively unimportant female-centered problems is like asking Latinos to help solve the issue of bullying in working class white communities. Is bullying a problem? Of course. But it just doesn't make sense at this point in US history for Latinos to contribute their efforts to solving that particular problem. When (if ever) men return to being generally advantaged compared to women, then it will make sense for men to spend their time solving problems that predominantly affect women. But with suicide and incarceration rates being so dramatically skewed, it's nonsensical to care about women being catcalled.
Secondly, why can't we have both medicine and positive social movements?
Another strawman. I'm saying that the "best men can be" is people who contribute great things, like penicillin, or moon landings. I never said we can't have positive social movements, in fact I didn't say anything about social movements at all. This whole time I have been specifically speaking about the contributions of individuals.
Why can't a man willing to stand up to his friend for the sake of a stranger be a role model? You're allowed to have more than one role model.
I think we're getting hung up on our usage of the term "role model." It's true, you can have multiple people whom you admire, I was using "role model" in an exclusive sense. Yes it's fine to have multiple role models, but on whom are you going to base the trajectory of your life? Anti-catcalling bro, or Neil Armstrong? It takes no training and effort to just regurgitate widely-accepted attitudes like "catcalling is bad mmmkay," whereas it takes many years of effort to get where Armstrong did. I don't really see modeling one specific behavior from a random dude to be treating him as a "role model" but I won't say that you're incorrect to use the term that way.
[–]numb3red 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link
Eliminating catcalling does not benefit men
Firstly, we're talking about men harassing women and treating them differently from men in general, not catcalling specifically. Secondly, doing what you claim to be effortless and eliminating these behaviors helps men too because then male strangers will be trusted more by women in general, and everyone can get along better. Women aren't distrustful of unknown men because they're randomly sexist or something, almost every adult woman has had negative experiences like I listed previously and like were demonstrated in the ad.
As for helping women being a sticking point, it's a sticking point because I view men as being in a disadvantaged position compared to women.
I honestly used to feel like this too but it's not true. Women generally have more security in exchange for less agency in society. Women win more custody because they're expected to be nurturers, men are the majority of workplace deaths because women generally aren't given the choice to work these kind of jobs, and because taking proper safety precautions is treated as emasculating and men who try to be safe are often shamed -- that's part of what toxic masculinity is -- (I work construction by the way, I can attest that women are totally capable of working it but it's socially disencouraged,) men are the vast majority of combat deaths because women are prevented from engaging in military combat, men commit more violent crime than women because of toxic masculinity, not because men are evil or because women are pure, women actually attempt suicide more often than men, but do it in more traditionally "feminine" ways (pills over guns) which happen to have a higher survival rate, etc. Sorry for the ramble, but if you examine these claims about where women supposedly have it "better" it almost always stems from women having less agency, and feminism would close all these gender gaps.
I never said we can't have positive social movements, in fact I didn't say anything about social movements at all. This whole time I have been specifically speaking about the contributions of individuals.
Social movements are literally just a bunch of individual contributions like anti-catcall bro in the aggregate.
[–]whyisthisallowed1 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Fucking braindead bitch you are. How dare you talk about toxic masculinity while gaslighting men and claiming women never abuse them. Women constantly try to destroy men's souls but somehow we're supposed to ignore this because the man hater says so.
Lmao how can you say men treat women differently when it's scientifically proven women worship other women? It's called the women are wonderful effect. You feminists just can't stop lying. Then you act like women somehow treat men equally when you just need to be near them and listen to how they gossip about men, ridicule short men etc. Men have no negative experiences! How can you look yourself in the mirror and act like you're honest when you excuse women's behavior cuz of past abuse but not men's. Typical Feminazi.
[–]DownrightCaterpillar 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
Women aren't distrustful of unknown men because they're randomly sexist or something
If a woman is distrustful of unknown men, it is bigotry. Don't downplay it, don't justify it. That bigotry might be based off of personal experience, it's still bigotry. I was cornered and attacked and chased multiple times by non-white kids at school growing up, they called me cracker often. Somehow I made it out of those experiences seeing all humans as individuals and not judging them as groups; why do you think women don't do the same?
Women generally have more security in exchange for less agency in society.
This is a lie. Feel free to substantiate how women literally don't have choices/agency. Over 50% of women are in the labor force. Yet as you mention, women also win primary custody more often. It's socially accepted both for women to be full-time mothers or wage slaves, whereas Americans are still not very accepting of full-time fathers. Women have more choice in this regard.
men commit more violent crime than women because of toxic masculinity
No, this is because of organized crime syndicates, which only recruit men (mafia, Bloods, Crips, etc). Subtract out crimes committed by professional criminals and you'll see that men and women commit violent crimes at the same rates. Stop talking out of your ass, start sourcing your claims. This is not the kind of sub where you can pay lip service to unproven feminist theories and be blindly accepted.
women actually attempt suicide more often than men, but do it in more traditionally "feminine" ways
This is a common misconception. Women don't attempt suicide more often, women cry for help more often. Women aren't stupid, they know that swallowing sleeping pills won't kill them. They use, as you put it, "feminine" suicide methods because they don't want to die. It's very misleading to pretend that women are in fact more suicidal than men; if they were, then more women would be dying from suicide than men. Women are not idiots, they are actively choosing not to die. This study shows that about 47% of people who attempt suicide don't even really want to die.
If you examine these claims about where women supposedly have it "better" it almost always stems from women having less agency, and feminism would close all these gender gaps.
Literally none of what you said demonstrates that women have less agency, other than the point I made about organized crime syndicates not recruiting women. That's a choice women don't really have. But in regards to the other choices:
Those are all choices. Portraying them as anything else is dishonest.
[–]whyisthisallowed1 -1 points0 points1 point 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Why don't women ever call out other women for gossiping? That's weird. Almost like they have an agenda to always put women first.
Imagine caring this much about defending sexism against men. Yet you feminists constantly claim feminists don't hate men. And women constantly make repulsive objectifying comments about men's genitals, ridicule their partners body's behind their backs, never heard a female call that out. Or when they ridicule male virgins.
[–]Uintahwolf 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
Cant be using logic here friend. Many men are just upset that maybe they have been shit bags for a very long time, and that maybe being a man is much more than what their shitty fathers told them.
The whole "white straight male" jab at the commercial always gets me too, because like you pointed out, there are bad POC in the video. It's almost like many people here are incels/white supremacists/red caps/scared conservatives who dont like their life style being shat on.
[–]numb3red 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Yep. I'm really glad I was able to see through a lot of this shit as I grew up. I'm still subbed to r/mensrights and r/tumblrinaction for perspective but I roll my eyes at posts like this.
Theres good conversations to be had here. I think a lot of people want to change, know they should change, but it takes hearing (seeing in this case) someone come out and actually say that change should occur. While I think Gilette is just milking the moral market, like capitalism does, I cant help but notice how many men are actually trying to discuss what makes a man good/bad.
Why don't she creatures ever stop gossiping and objectifying men behind their backs? Why do women love body shaming men so much? Why don't any female ever call it out?
Wow you're so fucking man hating but you can't see it. Modern women are the biggest hypocrites ever. Love the gaslighting too you're clearly mentally ill.
[–]Koollape 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
This ad literally called out assholes to stop being assholes, not calling out men to stop being assholes
[–]numb3red 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
Exactly. It's just confusing when a bunch of people act like it's targeting all men.
[–]SonyToyo 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
Maybe because it’s only calling out male assholes and not female cunts?
[–]numb3red -1 points0 points1 point 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Do you believe that "female cunts" have as large of a negative impact on society as toxic masculinity? Genuine question.
[–]SonyToyo 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Of course they do. Have you not heard of the modern western feminist movement?
[–]numb3red -1 points0 points1 point 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
lol
[–]SonyToyo -1 points0 points1 point 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Hmm yes thought so
LOL like women ever call out each others sexist hypocritical behavior.
[–]ShepardCommandActual -3 points-2 points-1 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Same triggered cucks voted trump to stick it to the librulz. Give me a break, enough solidarity with evil men
[+]Revolver_SucksAlot -24 points-23 points-22 points 7 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link
Why’d you color out his name with fag colors wtf
[–]Uintahwolf 7 points8 points9 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Probabaly shouldn't be scared of gay people in 2019 my guy.
[+]Revolver_SucksAlot -10 points-9 points-8 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Not scared, just annoyed
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Still just as bad
[–]Revolver_SucksAlot -5 points-4 points-3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Cool
[–]Bean0 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
It’s not even a rainbow...
[–]Revolver_SucksAlot -4 points-3 points-2 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
That’s what he was trying at.
[–]Bean0 5 points6 points7 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
There’s no pink in the pride/rainbow flag. Even if he was using that, why is it even ‘wtf’ worthy? Just seems like a really weird thing to take issue with, but judging by you using the word ‘fag’ you have bigger issues to worry about.
[–]The_25th_Baam 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Maybe you could take 5 seconds to Google what a pride flag actually looks like?
[–]Revolver_SucksAlot -2 points-1 points0 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
I don’t care enough to. You know what I’m getting at. That’s enough.
[–]The_25th_Baam 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I know what you're getting at, and you're wrong.
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.created by /u/dream-hunter
[–][deleted] 496 points497 points498 points (32 children) | Copy Link
[–]livegamer999 174 points175 points176 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]codereview 18 points19 points20 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Lonescu 24 points25 points26 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]PixelPete85 7 points8 points9 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Jex117 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]ChuckDexterWard 9 points10 points11 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Buzzkill78 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]junkeee999 -28 points-27 points-26 points (24 children) | Copy Link
[–]CyberToyger 23 points24 points25 points (17 children) | Copy Link
[+]junkeee999 -15 points-14 points-13 points (11 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points (10 children) | Copy Link
[–]junkeee999 -2 points-1 points0 points (9 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points (8 children) | Copy Link
[–]junkeee999 -2 points-1 points0 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]junkeee999 -1 points0 points1 point (5 children) | Copy Link
[+]junkeee999 -17 points-16 points-15 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]junkeee999 -1 points0 points1 point (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Jex117 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 14 points15 points16 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]junkeee999 -5 points-4 points-3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]samuraishogun1 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]junkeee999 -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]IronJohnMRA 370 points371 points372 points (52 children) | Copy Link
[–]RockmanXX 103 points104 points105 points (36 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 84 points85 points86 points (8 children) | Copy Link
[–]RockmanXX 95 points96 points97 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 34 points35 points36 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]JosephBw 14 points15 points16 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]yungdolpho 8 points9 points10 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]hectorduenas86 31 points32 points33 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 7 points8 points9 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]hectorduenas86 19 points20 points21 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 24 points25 points26 points
2 (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]SwiggityStag 5 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]steamedhamjob 5 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]C4H8N8O8 20 points21 points22 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]MadderHater 8 points9 points10 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]C4H8N8O8 7 points8 points9 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]toggleme1 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 26 points27 points28 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]OldSchoolNewRules 15 points16 points17 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Lethn 14 points15 points16 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]e1k3 1 point2 points3 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]RockmanXX 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]DignifiedAlpaca 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]BobbyMcFrayson 0 points1 point2 points (10 children) | Copy Link
[–]RockmanXX 3 points4 points5 points (9 children) | Copy Link
[–]BobbyMcFrayson 0 points1 point2 points (8 children) | Copy Link
[–]RockmanXX 2 points3 points4 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]BobbyMcFrayson -1 points0 points1 point (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]RockmanXX 1 point2 points3 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]BobbyMcFrayson 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]RockmanXX 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Morristron2099 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]BobbyMcFrayson 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Zoenboen 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]RockmanXX -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]hash_bang22 -2 points-1 points0 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]themolestedsliver 8 points9 points10 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]knoxfire -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Lick_The_Wrapper 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]Jake0024 -8 points-7 points-6 points (10 children) | Copy Link
[–]KROMExRainbow 1 point2 points3 points (9 children) | Copy Link
[–]Jake0024 -1 points0 points1 point (8 children) | Copy Link
[–]locoloic 2 points3 points4 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]Jake0024 -1 points0 points1 point (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]locoloic 1 point2 points3 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]Jake0024 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]locoloic 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Jake0024 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]KROMExRainbow 2 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Jake0024 -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]NecroHexr 106 points107 points108 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–]swiet[S] 61 points62 points63 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]macaryl95 48 points49 points50 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]ventuspilot 6 points7 points8 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]macaryl95 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]NaturalisticPhallacy 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Moroax 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Jabroni_Balogni 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Sad_Capybara 75 points76 points77 points (17 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 12 points13 points14 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]LeonardoDaTiddies -10 points-9 points-8 points (15 children) | Copy Link
[–]Sad_Capybara 22 points23 points24 points (9 children) | Copy Link
[+]LeonardoDaTiddies -8 points-7 points-6 points (8 children) | Copy Link
[–]Sad_Capybara 13 points14 points15 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–]LeonardoDaTiddies -5 points-4 points-3 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]Sad_Capybara 6 points7 points8 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]LeonardoDaTiddies 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]GregLouganus 2 points3 points4 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]Sad_Capybara 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]GregLouganus 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]NaturalisticPhallacy 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]alphamalejackhammer 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]LeonardoDaTiddies 3 points4 points5 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]alphamalejackhammer 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]PandaSixx 62 points63 points64 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Intellipus 58 points59 points60 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 16 points17 points18 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Greg_W_Allan 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Uintahwolf -5 points-4 points-3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 62 points63 points64 points (25 children) | Copy Link
[–]JaxJags904 53 points54 points55 points (16 children) | Copy Link
[–]BitsAndBobs304 32 points33 points34 points (14 children) | Copy Link
[–]macaryl95 30 points31 points32 points (9 children) | Copy Link
[–]codeki 28 points29 points30 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]macaryl95 13 points14 points15 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]BitsAndBobs304 6 points7 points8 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]macaryl95 6 points7 points8 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]PinkWhiteAndBlue 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]NaturalisticPhallacy 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]macaryl95 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]minitntman1 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]macaryl95 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]PixelPete85 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]bhullj11 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Halafax 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Uintahwolf -5 points-4 points-3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Arqium 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]cakesalie22 points [recovered] (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]tourguidebernie 13 points14 points15 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]mrstickman 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Quixotic_Ignoramus 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]tallwheel 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]matrix2002 12 points13 points14 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Uintahwolf 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 16 points17 points18 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 25 points26 points27 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]GuitarCFD 2 points3 points4 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]tallwheel 2 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]GuitarCFD 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]goat_nebula 9 points10 points11 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]Leoni0609 2 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]goat_nebula 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Uintahwolf 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]TheGreyGuyHari8 points [recovered] (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Uintahwolf -2 points-1 points0 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Morristron2099 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]raven982 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]nelsonbt9 points [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Uintahwolf 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points (27 children) | Copy Link
[–]timeslider 5 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]macaryl95 13 points14 points15 points (10 children) | Copy Link
[+]Uintahwolf -7 points-6 points-5 points (9 children) | Copy Link
[–]macaryl95 3 points4 points5 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]Uintahwolf -4 points-3 points-2 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]macaryl95 2 points3 points4 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]Uintahwolf -1 points0 points1 point (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]macaryl95 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]tallwheel 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]DownrightCaterpillar 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Uintahwolf -1 points0 points1 point (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]tallwheel 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]codeki16 points [recovered] (14 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] -10 points-9 points-8 points (13 children) | Copy Link
[–]Soulless35 8 points9 points10 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]Soulless355 points [recovered] (3 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] -2 points-1 points0 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Profligate-Prophet 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]theninja94 5 points6 points7 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]Uintahwolf -2 points-1 points0 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]theninja94 5 points6 points7 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]sneakpeekbot 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Uintahwolf -2 points-1 points0 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]tallwheel 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]theninja94 -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 8 points9 points10 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Profligate-Prophet -1 points0 points1 point (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Passthecranberries 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Moon_Glade 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]YeOldeVertiformCity 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Tyko_3 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]DeepFriedDoubleEE 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]J2501 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]dredawg1 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Melohdy 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]neightdog 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]OilyB 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Uintahwolf 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Emberwatch 1 point2 points3 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Emberwatch 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Uintahwolf 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Kid_Dragneel 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]omegaphallic 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]SIothhhhhhhhhhhh 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]BudnamedSpud 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]icexprincess 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]JuicyPro 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Anonfamous 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]OfDogsandRoses 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]DJ-Roukan 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]JackFisherBooks 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]OnTheSlope 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]RyanStrainMusic 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Whisper -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]wrenagade419 -3 points-2 points-1 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–]theninja94 2 points3 points4 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]Uintahwolf -3 points-2 points-1 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]theninja94 0 points1 point2 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]Uintahwolf 1 point2 points3 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]theninja94 -1 points0 points1 point (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Uintahwolf 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Corsign 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Bootleather -4 points-3 points-2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Greg_W_Allan 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]tomba444 -9 points-8 points-7 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]Soulless35 8 points9 points10 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]tomba444 -5 points-4 points-3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Soulless35 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]mrstickman 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]rosin-the-beau -4 points-3 points-2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]Smackdaddy122 -13 points-12 points-11 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Soulless35 7 points8 points9 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]Uintahwolf -9 points-8 points-7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]Kendricktheory -14 points-13 points-12 points (21 children) | Copy Link
[–]Soulless35 7 points8 points9 points (8 children) | Copy Link
[–]Uintahwolf -1 points0 points1 point (7 children) | Copy Link
[–]Soulless35 3 points4 points5 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]Uintahwolf -1 points0 points1 point (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]Soulless35 2 points3 points4 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Uintahwolf -1 points0 points1 point (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Soulless35 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]tallwheel 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]whyisthisallowed1 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]Uintahwolf -8 points-7 points-6 points (11 children) | Copy Link
[–]LettuceBeGrateful 8 points9 points10 points (10 children) | Copy Link
[+]Uintahwolf -8 points-7 points-6 points (9 children) | Copy Link
[–]Corsign 6 points7 points8 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Uintahwolf -1 points0 points1 point (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Corsign 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Soulless35 4 points5 points6 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]Uintahwolf 1 point2 points3 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]Soulless35 2 points3 points4 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Uintahwolf 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Soulless35 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]LettuceBeGrateful 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]Iagi -15 points-14 points-13 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]DootDeeDootDeeDoo 12 points13 points14 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Uintahwolf -5 points-4 points-3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]numb3red -13 points-12 points-11 points (32 children) | Copy Link
[–]DownrightCaterpillar 7 points8 points9 points (30 children) | Copy Link
[–]numb3red -1 points0 points1 point (29 children) | Copy Link
[–]DownrightCaterpillar 5 points6 points7 points (15 children) | Copy Link
[–]numb3red -4 points-3 points-2 points (14 children) | Copy Link
[–]DownrightCaterpillar 1 point2 points3 points (12 children) | Copy Link
[–]numb3red 1 point2 points3 points (11 children) | Copy Link
[–]DownrightCaterpillar 1 point2 points3 points (9 children) | Copy Link
[–]numb3red 0 points1 point2 points (8 children) | Copy Link
[–]whyisthisallowed1 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]whyisthisallowed1 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]DownrightCaterpillar 0 points1 point2 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]whyisthisallowed1 -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]whyisthisallowed1 -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Uintahwolf 1 point2 points3 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]numb3red 2 points3 points4 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]Uintahwolf 1 point2 points3 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]whyisthisallowed1 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]whyisthisallowed1 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Koollape 1 point2 points3 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]numb3red 1 point2 points3 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]SonyToyo 1 point2 points3 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]numb3red -1 points0 points1 point (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]SonyToyo 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]numb3red -1 points0 points1 point (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]SonyToyo -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]whyisthisallowed1 -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]ShepardCommandActual -3 points-2 points-1 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]Revolver_SucksAlot -24 points-23 points-22 points (10 children) | Copy Link
[–]Uintahwolf 7 points8 points9 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[+]Revolver_SucksAlot -10 points-9 points-8 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Revolver_SucksAlot -5 points-4 points-3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Bean0 1 point2 points3 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Revolver_SucksAlot -4 points-3 points-2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Bean0 5 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]The_25th_Baam 1 point2 points3 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Revolver_SucksAlot -2 points-1 points0 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]The_25th_Baam 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link