TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

    • /r/AllPillDebate
    • /r/AlreadyRed
    • /r/altTRP
    • /r/AntiFeminists
    • /r/askFDS
    • /r/askMRP
    • /r/askRPC
    • /r/becomeaman
    • /r/BlackPillScience
    • /r/Chadfish
    • /r/Divorce_Men
    • /r/EverydayMisandry
    • /r/ExRedPill
    • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
    • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
    • /r/GEOTRP
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • /r/MalePsychology
    • /r/Male_Studies
    • /r/MenSupportMen
    • /r/MGTOW2
    • /r/MuslimRedPill
    • /r/newTRP
    • /r/PussyPass
    • /r/PussyPassDenied
    • /r/RedPillBooks
    • /r/RedPillParenting
    • /r/RedPillWives
    • /r/RedPillWomen
    • /r/RedPillWorkplace
    • /r/RPChristians
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/ThankTRP
    • /r/TheRedPillStories
    • /r/trpGAME
    • /r/TRPOffTopic
    • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
    • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

    • Artful Prudence
    • A Voice for Men
    • Alpha Game
    • Black Label Logic
    • Caleb Jones
    • Captain Capitalism
    • Corporate Machiavelli
    • Days of Game
    • Deep Strength
    • Dicipres
    • Donal Graeme
    • Female Misogynist
    • Free Northerner
    • Gaming My Wife
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • In Mala Fide
    • KillToParty
    • Kill Your Inner Loser
    • Krauser PUA
    • LaidNYC
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • NO MA'AM
    • Omega Virgin Revolt
    • Pook's Mill
    • Random Xpat Rantings
    • Red Pill Theory
    • Red Pill Wifery
    • RedPillDad
    • RedPillDoctor
    • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
    • Sigma Frame
    • The Feminine Woman
    • The Futurist
    • The Masculine Principle
    • The Modern Man
    • The New Modern Man
    • The Obsidian Files
    • The Power Moves
    • The Private Man
    • The Red Pill Room
    • The Red Quest
    • The Rules Revisited
    • The Spearhead
    • Troy Francis
    • Wintery Knight
    • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

Judge dismisses case against man for sending birthday card to daughter. Dismissing the charge brought under the Domestic Violence Act against the man, the judge stated:“I mean, if we have reached a stage in our society where a man is deemed to have breached a safety order by sending a birthday card"

wntk

April 10, 2021
1791 upvotes
/r/MensRights
https://www.independent.ie/irish-news/courts/judge-dismisses-case-against-man-for-sending-birthday-card-to-daughter-40296238.html
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title Judge dismisses case against man for sending birthday card to daughter. Dismissing the charge brought under the Domestic Violence Act against the man, the judge stated:“I mean, if we have reached a stage in our society where a man is deemed to have breached a safety order by sending a birthday card"
Author

wntk

Upvotes 1791
Comments 163
Date April 10, 2021 7:49 PM UTC
(5 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/mobosl/judge_dismisses_case_against_man_for_sending/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/judge-dismisses-case-against-man-for-sending.1189133
https://theredarchive.com/post/1189133
Red Pill terms in post
domestic violence
Top posts by wntk

Study finds that "manuscripts written by women as solo authors or coauthored by women were treated even more favorably by referees and editors" yet gets reported with the heading "no gender bias". Gender bias against men doesn't seem to count as gender bias!

1961 upvotes
January 8, 2021
/r/MensRights

University singles out white men with ‘antiracism’ pledge as feds investigate it for anti-male bias | The College Fix

1872 upvotes
August 27, 2020
/r/MensRights

Following a petition, Winchester University cancelled a talk with two men's rights activists in 2019. Here is the text of one of the talks (by William Collins) that were planned. It covers education, suffrage and coverture. It's disappointing that such views can't be expressed in such a forum.

1332 upvotes
January 10, 2021
/r/MensRights

"Bangalore Traffic Police To Fine Men If They Occupy Women's Reserved Seats...Even If They Are Empty"

1161 upvotes
November 30, 2019
/r/MensRights

"Women tortured man by burning hair tongs and cigarette lighter on to his genitals like a scene from Reservoir Dogs when they found out he dated three people at once". All let go. Male accomplice (who did other crimes also) jailed

924 upvotes
March 17, 2015
/r/MensRights

(UK) "Sex Bias in Criminal Justice" (2018). Thorough blog where he goes through the data on gender differences in different categories e.g. arrests v prosecutions; disparities regarding: imprisonment; sentences; cautions; convictions; convictions; discharges; community sentences; suspended sentences

838 upvotes
April 16, 2021
/r/MensRights

95% of strip searches of children reported in England & Wales are of boys. This may or may not be an issue but I found it interesting that it was considered unfair that black children were more likely to be strip-searched but this huge gender disparity was barely mentioned in lots of media coverage.

829 upvotes
March 30, 2023
/r/MensRights

"Forcing feminism down South" "official approach taken by Cooperation Agencies ... if you want money for food you have to pass a law that will privilege women or give most of the funds to them or “educate” males to let them know how wrong they’ve being doing or find another way to empower women."

807 upvotes
September 5, 2020
/r/MensRights

Comments

[–]PrimeWolf88 564 points565 points566 points 5 years ago (49 children) | Copy Link

We live in a world where a male lifeguard can be sued for rescuing and resuscitating a woman...

[–]phishyfingers 249 points250 points251 points 5 years ago* (39 children) | Copy Link

Remember the good Samaritan that stopped to help a woman who's car broke down on the side of the road? He actually had to do car repairs so she could drive home.

She reported him to the cops. If memory serves, she claimed he followed her from the garage and sexually assaulted her.

Fortunately for him, he was recorded on a CCTV repairing her car and then leaving in his car... No hanky panky.

Naturally there were no (edit#2) consequences for the bitch.

Edit#1

https://www.nzherald.co.nz/world/woman-who-accused-man-of-assault-after-he-fixed-her-car-admits-making-it-up/ICUS5UJMOCGFC664ROSQXIFZZ4/

Woman who accused man of assault after he fixed her car admits making it up.

[–]markedbull 161 points162 points163 points 5 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

Naturally there were no charges against the bitch.

That's not quite true. There were charges, she plead guilty, and she was sentenced to nine months in jail. She only had to serve two hours. Two fucking hours for ruining a man's life!

Source: https://www.news.com.au/national/nsw-act/courts-law/caitlyn-gray-sentenced-for-knowingly-making-a-false-statement-against-kenan-basic/news-story/4a4c9cae521751b9a5c58a05d2ad8b32

[–]AJtheW 85 points86 points87 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I did more time in a cell because some old lady thought I was drunk in walmart..

[–]TheAngryGoat 72 points73 points74 points 5 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Two hours in return for destroying his life:

The man faced serious sexual charges and spent two weeks in Silverwater Prison. Because of the ordeal, he also lost his job and is going through a divorce.

A system that knowingly punishes an innocent man a thousand times more than a guilty woman, and has the audacity to call that justice.

[–]PrimeWolf88 21 points22 points23 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

And has the audacity to call it a patriarchy.

[–]zidekick1 3 points4 points5 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Oh stop being so sensitive his punishment was only 168 times more severe. Lol

[–]TheAngryGoat 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Even though you're joking, losing your job, becoming unemployable and having your marriage destroyed is far more damaging than 2 weeks inside.

[–]zidekick1 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You’re absolutely right. Then it’s probably more than a thousand times. How did we let it get to this point. Poor guy.

[–]-Cagafuego- 40 points41 points42 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

One article mentions his name & not hers but also shows his face. The next article mentions her name & shows his face but not hers.

SHE'S THE CRIMINAL, NOT HIM. SHOW HER FACE DAMN IT.

NAME, BLAME, & SHAME!

Caitlyn Gray - Don't get into a relationship with that cunt & definitely don't help her out with her shitmobile!

[–]Vorpal_Spork 4 points5 points6 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Same thing as no charges though.

[–]az226 75 points76 points77 points 5 years ago (27 children) | Copy Link

He spent 2 weeks in jail. She only had to spend 2 hours in jail before she was out on bail. Fuck that. As for her motivation, despicable. She ruined a man’s life. Also she looks like a hag.

“Are you lying?” the investigator pushed.

“Yes,” Gray responded.

When asked why she lied, Gray said she “just wanted (Mr Basic) to go to jail”.

“He shouldn’t have said that to me. He was disgusting.”

[–]retardedwhiteknight 28 points29 points30 points 5 years ago (26 children) | Copy Link

why even help expect people you know at this point

[–]az226 31 points32 points33 points 5 years ago (25 children) | Copy Link

Except people you know and other men.

Women and children, don’t even go near. Not worth the personal risk.

[+]DraganTehPro -37 points-36 points-35 points 5 years ago (24 children) | Copy Link

I feel like that's a little unfair. Just because a couple of women are ungrateful pieces of crap doesn't mean we should stop helping women.

[–]retardedwhiteknight 40 points41 points42 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

do it on your own risk of accusation then, law or media wont help you.

[–]Jesus_marley 23 points24 points25 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

They can fix their own cars. They can fight their own fights. If women are as strong and independent as they claim to be, if they are just as capable as men in all aspects of life, then they can handle all of life's troubles on their own, just like a man.

I'm tired of being told over and over that women want to be treated equally to men but then cry misogyny when they are.

[–]isthebuffetopenyet 14 points15 points16 points 5 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Not all women, but we dont know which ones are bitches, so we avoid them all? Sound familiar?

[–]DraganTehPro -2 points-1 points0 points 5 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

This is like FDS tbh. They have a bad relationship with one man and now they think all men are trash.

[–]PrimeWolf88 6 points7 points8 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm just glad I'm gay and don't have to put up with this shit. I genuinely despair for what you all have to put up with and risk just to have a normal life. How times have changed.

[–][deleted] 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]JimmyFett 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Good bot

[–][deleted] 5 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]DraganTehPro 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Here where i live we don't really have thunderstorms, maybe only twice a year. But i get your point.

[–]masterdarthrevan 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Well if women kept other women from doing this type of shit, us men wouldn't worry so much about helping you out. Sorry a few disgusting bitches had to ruin things for the rest of you. But the risk for punishment is "too damn high"

[–]Cindylynn43 3 points4 points5 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Some of us are trying to keep this crap from happening. Thankfully, I am married to a great husband. Unfortunately, I know how high the risks are. I worry about him, and all Men these day's. It's absolutely disgusting the shit these bitches are doing.

[–]masterdarthrevan 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Good on you. I like to help and am generally really helpful, but only to my wife, her family and my family and friends. Don't need unnecessary risks.

[–]DraganTehPro 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm not a woman mate.

[–]phishyfingers 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Just because a couple of women are ungrateful pieces of crap doesn't mean we should stop helping women.

Just because a couple of men are rapist pieces of crap doesn't mean we should start hating men.

[–]DraganTehPro 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

And I completely agree with that.

[–]Kind_Yandere 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Women can help other women lol. Plus there are a ton of simps. There's no need to put yourself at risk.

Plus by women I mean a reproductive age woman. It's not like I'll leave a lost 10 year old girl because she's a 'woman'. I will do the right thing and hand her over to the cops.

Same for a 70 year old grandma. They are the sweetest, and there's usually no problem helping them with shopping or around the house. (Maybe it's just my experience, but they always bake nice stuff and love when someone talks to them).

[–]Laszu 5 points6 points7 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Wrong! If you see a lost 10 year old girl - run. Call the police, yes, but look up all the cases of false pedo accusations, it's insane.

Old ones are safe, that's true.

[–]Kind_Yandere 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Shit it's getting worse.

[–]rbrockway 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

If you do have to come to the aid of a child:

*Start recording and keep recording until you can hand the child over to the relevant authorities.

*Avoid touching the child if you possibly can.

*Don't move the child to another location unless it is essential to do so. Wait for the relevant authorities to come to you.

*Try to have a witness. A female witness is best.

[–]phishyfingers 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

*Start recording and keep recording until you can hand the child over to the relevant authorities.

Recording with my phone has come with many surprises over the years. Little glitches that caused me to lose my recorded video.

I've learned that it's best to make several smaller videos rather than one large file. Then, if you lose one, you still have others.

Also, start backing your video up into the cloud or even better, send smaller files to trusted friends in case things go south while helping a child or even an older lady. You will want friends to come forward with video evidence that the child was doing well in your care.

[–]AfraidDifficulty8 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I mean I generally don't stop for hitchhikers and stuff like that, its just too much of a risk to allow a stranger in your car.

[–]DraganTehPro -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I was talking more about we shouldn't not help only because it's a woman.

[–]SewageFace 4 points5 points6 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Not super duper, I think the message is "america is fucked right now and if you help women you have a much much larger chance to be accused of things you didn't do than you used to be"... Women think that men have always just been crazy rapists and that they are just now putting their foot down...

[–]nyarlathotep999 4 points5 points6 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Something tells me she was mad he didn't make a pass at her.

[–]wntk[S] 113 points114 points115 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I only dip in and out of here. Did that ever happen? I would like to store info on it for the future if it did.

[–][deleted] 85 points86 points87 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It happened like 2 or 3 times I think.

[–]InconspicuousBastard 18 points19 points20 points 5 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

The sad part about all of these pro-feminist/anti-male groups/ideologies is that ultimately it ends up hurting women in the long run.

When you start treating every man as a potential rapist, how do you think people will respond?

In the UK, feminists are now complaining because random strange men will no longer get involved when women ask for help or are in need of help.

Women less likely to receive bystander CPR than men, research shows

Women are literally dying because of this movement making men completely hands off. And you know, why not? If the prize for attempting life saving help is a very real threat of assault charges, where your entire life's work can be over in a heartbeat? Why bother?

This has also led to men not wanting to do any sort of 1:1 with women, especially behind closed doors, or in any activities outside the office; the consequences of a false allegation far outweighs any good Samaritan activity the man could have performed.

[–]PrimeWolf88 5 points6 points7 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I've done CPR training with St John's Ambulance service, where they've actually warned people that CPR and Heimlich maneuver can put you in legal jeapardy, since Heimlich can leave bruises, and CPR can crack ribs in some circumstances. Not saying you'll lose if you go to court...but they try and sell you insurance at the end of a course for that very reason...And is it worth the risk of doing this for a woman when she can ruin your life?

[–]rbrockway 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Recent research has shown that fewer people are willing to perform CPR on a woman than a man.

[–]PrimeWolf88 3 points4 points5 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah, I saw a link to something about this in this thread. That's the reason for my comment. I don't think the average person realises that relations between men and women are actually this bad.

[–]retrigger_mania 49 points50 points51 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Remember the sexual assault scene in the movie sandlot?

[–]18Apollo18 24 points25 points26 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

But that is literally assaulting something without their consent vs trying to save their life

[–]PrimeWolf88 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Never seen it

[–][deleted] 221 points222 points223 points 5 years ago (15 children) | Copy Link

Lots of guys get treated like this and can’t contact their children because of orders. Then people call them deadbeat fathers.

[–]HeadHigh71 129 points130 points131 points 5 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link

My ex wife has an no contact order against me, I haven't seen my kids in over a year now.

[–]Balls_DeepinReality 37 points38 points39 points 5 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

Two years for me. Right there with you man.

[–]HeadHigh71 17 points18 points19 points 5 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

Damn...at least you have me and other guys in your corner.

[–]Balls_DeepinReality 19 points20 points21 points 5 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

I’m in a great relationship now, it’s crazy what that does for you

[–]HeadHigh71 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

That's awesome, I'm happy to hear that from you :)

[–]Pandlebee 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

What is usually the reason for such safety orders?

[–]HeadHigh71 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Out of spite and if you violate it. You go to jail instantly. And your ex gets a good hard laugh and she'll say you're dangerous since you violated it. Oh and alienate you from your kids by brainwashing your kids by telling them that you're a deadbeat who abandoned them. But you can't visit cause of the no contact order.

That sums it up.

[–]Pandlebee 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

On what grounds can someone get such an order.

[–]HeadHigh71 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

He yelled at me, he hit me, I fear for my safety.

[–][deleted] 51 points52 points53 points 5 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Kids are taught not to value their father so often they remain estranged for a considerable amount of time possibly even life.

[–]thirdridge 18 points19 points20 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I'm sure this is just the comforting reply he needed...

[–]HeadHigh71 23 points24 points25 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's not the reply I needed, but we both know it's the sad truth.

[–][deleted] 13 points14 points15 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yes I know but I couldn’t bring myself to tell him that Santa is real and bringing his kids to his house for Christmas.

[–]Famous-Beautiful-731 297 points298 points299 points 5 years ago (35 children) | Copy Link

We're well beyond that point. We're at the point where men walking on the same side of the street as a woman is harrasment. Where a man looking at a woman for too long is harrasment.

Men are just evil. They're pure scum and unless you admit that you're a dangerous incel who hates women.

[–]ridderrobby 122 points123 points124 points 5 years ago (26 children) | Copy Link

Last year I helped a woman get up after she tripped, now I'm in prison for 20 years.

[–]Considered_Dissent 78 points79 points80 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Reminds me of the poor bastard in Australia who changed a teen girl's car tyre for her and ended up dragged through the court for several years, divorced and jobless.

[–]rbrockway 36 points37 points38 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Kenan Basic.

[–]Kind_Yandere 3 points4 points5 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

What now you're typing this from prison? Did you smuggle your phone in?

[–]MisfitAngel669 7 points8 points9 points 5 years ago (16 children) | Copy Link

What the hell?? They charged you for what exactly? I just don’t get it.

[–]Coolshirt4 8 points9 points10 points 5 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link

Because they are making stuff up.

In America, anyone can sue anyone for anything, so the fact that people get sued for stupid shit should be no surprise.

Apart from some Anti-SLAP laws in some states, there is no penalty to doing frivolous lawsuits, except maybe having to pay the other guys lawyers fees.

Being found guilty is another matter.

[–]MisfitAngel669 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link

Seriously? I rarely hear about people suing in Canada. I wonder if that is one of those mostly American things.

[–]Coolshirt4 5 points6 points7 points 5 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

I'm not sure the exact difference between Canada and the US when it comes to suing, bit I think Canadian courts, being based in the British system are more likely to make the loser pay the winners lawyer fees.

But the reason you hear about so many frivolous suits in the US is a propaganda campaign run by a lobby group representing big companies, including McDonalds.

The story of the lady who spilled coffee on herself and sued McDonalds was purposely twisted to make the public scared of frivolous lawsuits.

You should look at what really happened. Some wacky stuff. Fused Labia

[–]MisfitAngel669 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Oh. I just thought the Mc Donald’s coffee thing was to make people look like they are stupid, and that faults in common logic could mean a big pay out. 😂 Silly me.

[–]Lord_Emanon -3 points-2 points-1 points 5 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

The story was twisted. Because the woman DIDN'T order coffee. She DIDN'T put the coffee, without a lid, between her own legs in her car. She had NO IDEA that coffee is hot enough to burn you. Right.

[–]Coolshirt4 8 points9 points10 points 5 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

The coffee was way hotter than coffees usually are. McDonald's did that to mask the flavour.

She only sued for her medical bills, which were pretty extreme, because the coffee was just about boiling.

A jury looked at McDonald's history of doing similar things and awarded one day of McDonald's profits.

This was later reduced by a judge.

[–]Stephen_Morgan 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I believe it was her family that sued, as she died soon after the incident. Due to tort reform laws the family didn't even receive enough to cover the medical costs.

[–]Lord_Emanon -2 points-1 points0 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

TBH, it doesn't matter to me if it was 100° or 212°. I know my coffee is hot. I don't put myself into a situation to get burned. If I were a juror (if that existed in this case, I don't particularly remember), I would award her the exact sum of $0 for spilling coffee on herself. Cashier dropped the cup, spilling the hot coffee on her, resulting in a burn? THEN and ONLY THEN should they have held any liability. That's my opinion.

[–]Coolshirt4 3 points4 points5 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Well, that's not the decision the jury came to.

Andbthe main thing is the propaganda campaign Mcdonalds ran off the back of this case.

[–]MBV-09-C 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Coffee is NOT supposed to give you THIRD DEGREE burns in seconds, mate. That's absolutely a safety hazard to serve someone a drink that hot.

[–]anoamas321 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Can someone give me a TLDR of the McDonald lawsuit

[–]AfraidDifficulty8 3 points4 points5 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

A woman ordered coffee from McDonalds and spilt it on herself and sued them.

That is what McDonalds said happened.

However, she sued them because the coffee was so hot she suffered third-degree burns and had to undergo surgery because of it.

[–]Coolshirt4 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Very much a TLDR here https://youtu.be/Q9DXSCpcz9E

Basically, Mcdonald made a policy of making coffee almost boiling to mask the flavour.

In a parking lot, she spilled her coffee on herself. She admits this was her fault. She suffers third degree burns to her genitals and legs.

She sues Mcdonals for her medical bills: about 20 000.

Mcdonald offers 800.

She took them to court and the jury awarded her 2.9 million, mostly to send McDonald's a message.

This was later reduced.

[–]AJtheW 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

They're joking.

[–]wntk[S] 14 points15 points16 points 5 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

I presume that's not true so what's the point of your message?

[–]Luchadorgreen 77 points78 points79 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I think it was a joke about how any innocuous interaction can lead to an accusation that will ruin your life.

[–]PenDownWriting 35 points36 points37 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Satire?

[–]LateralThinker13 26 points27 points28 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

For now.

[–]PenDownWriting 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Bruh, true.

[+]TangyAlt -57 points-56 points-55 points 5 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Jesus, man. Take your meds and go outside.

[–]Frosty-Gate-8094 9 points10 points11 points 5 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Outside is where all the risk is...

If you sit in your basement and play video games all day, nobody can accuse you.

Ironically, feminists have problem when men do that too.

[–]Kind_Yandere -4 points-3 points-2 points 5 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

What? Never heard of feminists having problem with basement dwelling men.

If that's true, how fucking entitled you can be? You want men to keep working as slaves and paying taxes so that the government can keep supporting single women?

[–]MBV-09-C 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

You've never heard feminists having problems with video games? Video games are always being targeted for 'depicting fictional women in a way that's sexual or violent against them' games like GTA especially. It's a ridiculous argument of course, because any games where you can beat/kill women in them will definitely let you do the same towards the men, and the male enemies will be much more plentiful 9/10 times.

[–]Kind_Yandere -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That's so retarded lol.

[–]Frosty-Gate-8094 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

They have a problem with porn too.

Despite porn being one of the few industries, where women are paid more than men.

Feminists encourage sex work, but discourage porn. Why?
Go figure!

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Accurate how it feels

[–]introspectthis 93 points94 points95 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I like how the description is, "the mothers dependant" instead of, "his child". Without knowing the reasons for the PFA i can't say much, but it's things like this that really highlight just how little fathers are recognized as actual parents.

[–]rbrockway 53 points54 points55 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Feminists often use the phrase ''women and their children''. The wording isn't an accident.

[–]lizzyb187 113 points114 points115 points 5 years ago* (12 children) | Copy Link

My husband used to date a girl for about a year and they broke up.

He mailed a few things of hers back to her address.

The cop showed up to our home and served him papers.

She filed for a restraining order saying that he sent her an unwanted package which counts as harassment apparently.

She got the restraining order after she took him to court on video chat and now that video chat of him in court is public record for anyone to see on YouTube making him look like a stalker when all he did was mail something back to her that belong to her.

The judge was a woman and wouldn't even let him talk.

[–]Greedyfr00b 67 points68 points69 points 5 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

I'm so sorry! Feminists really have no place in family law, at all

[–]lizzyb187 39 points40 points41 points 5 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Yeah that was exactly one year ago and now we're just sitting here hoping a cop doesn't knock on the door to renew the damn thing it's fucking ridiculous all he did was send her her things back

[–]vector5633 10 points11 points12 points 5 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

No court date for the original TOP? No court appearance? Need more info.

[–]lizzyb187 13 points14 points15 points 5 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Yes there was a court appearance I mentioned it if you read the whole thing I said it was video chat court appearance and I said the judge was a woman

What's t o p?

[–]vector5633 5 points6 points7 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

TOP = Temporary Order of Protection.

[–]lizzyb187 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Well yes there was a court date that's why I mentioned a court appearance

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Temporary order of protection

[–]vector5633 17 points18 points19 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I lucked out! My judge was a male and he did the right thing.

[–]retardedwhiteknight 10 points11 points12 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

imagine having a woman judge is unlucky, fuck how did we get here

[–]RingosTurdFace 4 points5 points6 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

And now that woman can pose as a “victim” and “survivor”, making herself the centre of attention and expecting people to take her views more strongly into account.

A real bonus for narcissists.

[–]retrigger_mania 93 points94 points95 points 5 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

The prosecutor who brought these charges should be tarred and feathered.

[–][deleted] 5 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]Tank-o-grad 8 points9 points10 points 5 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Can you think of a dumber thing to say publicly?

[+]Balls_DeepinReality -9 points-8 points-7 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Maybe that you’re trafficking minors?

[–]Tank-o-grad 3 points4 points5 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Congratulations, I think, that probably would be a dumber thing to say...

Of course that does prove you're capable of reason so making your previous stament look all the dumber.

[+]Balls_DeepinReality -9 points-8 points-7 points 5 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

What’s your name, I’ll find your address for you

Here: https://www.truepeoplesearch.com/

Do it yourself

[–]calmatt 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm confused, the court granted a safety order ordering the man to not contact the women or his children.

He then broke this order deliberately by contacting the child.

How is this not a violation of the courts orders?

[–]vector5633 63 points64 points65 points 5 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Guys,

This is for any man that reads this small post from me. I went through all of these false allegations. Kicked out of my home, kids taken from, labeled an abuser. TOP put on me by my STBXW. This all happened right before COVID hit. Courts closed down, the world shut down. My case went in to a hold. Fast-forward to now. My case was dismissed and TOP vacated based on no findings. There's more to this but not going to discuss details. I had a great team of lawyers to pull me out of this.

Here are my recommendations. If you get served with a TOP because of false allegations.

The very 1st thing you MUST do is get a good lawyer ASAP!!! Read reviews online. That is a MUST!!!

2- DO NOT AND I MEAN DO NOT violate that TOP. Even if the allegations against you are 10000% false.

3- Once you get your lawyer. Provide every piece of documentation that supports your innocence. Videos, pictures, texts.... ANYTHING!!!!

4- Never EVER bad mouth her over voicemail or text. EVER!!!!

5- Follow that Order to the T.

6- Do NOT lie to your lawyer. He/she must know everything! They need to know how to build the case to get you out of the pile of shit you have been put under. Any information you withhold from them can be brought up in court and your lawyer is not going to be ready for it because you never said anything to them about it.

7- Listen to your lawyer and their advice. If you don't agree with it, then speak up as to why you don't agree with it.

8- When the lawyer starts to talk lawyer language. All the legal terms you may not understand. Stop them and tell them to speak in plain English. You need to be comfortable with what they say to you and you MUST understand it.

9- Stand your ground. There are going to be times you may bump heads with your lawyer and that's expected. But always stand your ground.

10- This is very important. Your intuition...if you feel in your gutt you have a good lawyer. Keep them. If you feel you have a shit lawyer, toss them ASAP!

I just came out of the darkest point in my life. I made it out alive. Huge family and friend support system.

But my lawyers were the ones that fought for me and protected me to the very end. Once things came to an end I told them. That I have gained two new friends at the end of this disaster. They were my lawyers.

[–]AmanteApacionado 5 points6 points7 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This is very sound advice.

[–]Balls_DeepinReality 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Most lawyers are shit.

I went through three. All shit.

[–]Ibetrayed_makarov 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

.... Can disagree,also cant agree.... There are good people too. Thats what i think

[–]Balls_DeepinReality 6 points7 points8 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I’ve yet to find one, I’ve had to report three for unprofessional conduct and knowingly submitting false information to the court. It’s insane.

[–]Mycroft033 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Good advice

[–]vasekgamescz 45 points46 points47 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Wow, a judge with common sense? Never heard of that before.

[–][deleted] 5 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]retardedwhiteknight 7 points8 points9 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

feminism and twitter: this is still not enough

[–]Benedikto_ 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

As a monster, please don't. That would be insulting to us.

[–]randomasshole2478 41 points42 points43 points 5 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

What a piece of shit...poor father

[–]TheSurvivor10859 13 points14 points15 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

You might wanna put a comma, like this, "piece of crap, poor father" so people dont misunderstand the sentence

[–]randomasshole2478 11 points12 points13 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I put ... Instead

Everyone else got it

[–]TheSurvivor10859 7 points8 points9 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Oh sorry then lol

[–]Amesang 31 points32 points33 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

But she could have gotten a papercut! /S

[–]PenDownWriting 11 points12 points13 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

He was endangering her for fucks same, shouldn’t be around kids smh /s

[–]VIIIMan 9 points10 points11 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Boy, his ex sounds like a peach.

[–]Mycroft033 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I know right

[–]Southerndude62 7 points8 points9 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I have said it elsewhere, and I'll say it again. Don't help women. Don't hire or promote them. Don't meet with them except in a public place with witnesses/ a place that has cameras. They want equality, give it to them.

[–]WartimeDad 7 points8 points9 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Lol he has the same ex wife as I do.

[–]Ciobanesc 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Nah, she probably just hired a lawyer to represent her in divorce. This is standard procedure, to remove the man from the premises and to put him in hardship. Expect your accounts to be blocked, also.

[–]Bojack35 21 points22 points23 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm glad the case was dismissed.

But let's be fair there is a court order that bars him communicating with the women or her dependants. Sending a birthday card to his daughter can be considered communicating with her so he has breached the court order.

You wouldn't think it is enough to go to court for but all depends on the context of why he is barred from communicating to begin with.

[–]evaneli13 7 points8 points9 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I was at a bar last night and I saw a woman fall a few feet away from me. She was fine and got up on her own. I was thinking that maybe I should help her up but I said fuck it. I much rather be an asshole that didn't help and have a good time rather than being the good guy that gets verbally abused and embarrassed in public.

[–]Southerndude62 6 points7 points8 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Good call. They are strong and independent wahmen. Let them deal with their own issues.

[–]evaneli13 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I would have totally have helped some dude up. Without question.

It's sad that we have to fear of acting like gentlemen with women. Then women complain that we are assholes that don't help.

[–]Lice138 20 points21 points22 points 5 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

I don’t know the full story. First off , there is a restraining order in effect (we don’t know why) and the charges were dropped. I think men get screwed over for real enough so we don’t t have to get outraged over clickbait.

[–]AtemAndrew 22 points23 points24 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Well, it's a 'safety order'. As far as I can tell, a safety order can either be a protection order or a restraining order, but searches point towards the former. The key difference is that a protection order is temporary (some, such as the article I found on safety orders, not even forcing the person given the order from leaving the house) Does not require the presence of the accused abuser, and does not require a lawyer or a full court hearing. As far as we know from this, it could just be the mother being spiteful and trying to cut her ex off from their daughter.

[–]Lice138 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

But you have no idea if it is deserved or not. They just omitted info to make a better story.

[–]AtemAndrew 3 points4 points5 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Exactly. We don't have enough information to go off either way.

[–]UiGogeta05 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This is a joke right? A dad can’t send his daughter a god damn birthday card for her fucking birthday!? WHAT KIND OF FUCKING WORLD DO WE LIVE IN WHERE A DAD CANT SEND HIS FUCKING CHILDREN A DAMNN BIRTHDAY CARD!?!?

[–]Apellosine 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

He did something that he was expressly prohibited from doing though. The woman had a court order prohibiting him from contacting her or her dependents including their daughter. What is the issue here, is sending a card, birthday card or not to someone that you have a court order from communicating with not contravening this order?

[–]JayTheFordMan 6 points7 points8 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Depends on definition of 'communication'. The receipt of a card may not (does not?) define as communication, but merely receipt of a gift. I think it was the right call, depending on contents of said card

[–]Apellosine -3 points-2 points-1 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Sending a letter is not communication? That is a weird definition that you have there.

[–]JayTheFordMan 4 points5 points6 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It was a card, not a letter.

Like I said, a card on its own may not be defined as 'communication', depending of course on contents of said card, but a letter certainly would. As I said, depends on content

[–]mattgk39 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Ehhh to be fair he was specifically barred from communicating with his ex and “her dependents”. I don’t know the merits of that order, but the headline is misleading.

[–]MarsNirgal -4 points-3 points-2 points 5 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

I'm probably going against what the sub will think about this, but I'd say dismissing the case was a mistake if we take things at a face value.

IF we assume that the safety order is there for valid reasons (we can argue about that, but that's an entirely different conversation), then I think any breach of it should be treated as a serious matter.

Not because sending the birthday card in itself is bad, but because it establishes the precedent that a safety order can be acceptably violated. IF that order is there for a reason, then we shouldn't create the expectation that it can be broken because that's the kind of things that can escalate.

Again, I am assuming its validity. Arguing about that point is a completely different conversation.

[–]Mycroft033 5 points6 points7 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

You might have a point. We don’t have all the facts the judge had, so we can’t make that call, but to me a birthday card seems fairly innocent, but I see what you’re saying.

[–]Huntanz 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Agreed not enough information as to the protection order, say father has been abusing daughter for some time and she gets a birthday card just saying "Happy Birthday be seeing you soon", sounds innocent but would scare the shit out of her. Hoping that's not the case though.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'd say that the contents of the card were open to the judge. If there's nothing bad, then let the kid have two parents.

[–]bumblebritches57 -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Based of the judge

[+]Braingasms -12 points-11 points-10 points 5 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Oh my god this thread is full of strawman bullshit and leaps in logic that are completely unfounded. Go whine on MGTOW for fuck's sake. Dude broke a protective order and the charges brought were valid.

[–]Laszu 3 points4 points5 points 5 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

The order was due to some false alkegations from the ex-wife. She violated her daughter's human rights just to get back at her ex!

[–]Braingasms -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

According to what? Where is your source or evidence of that?

[–]Laszu 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I've been the child in a simmilar situation. It's always like that.

[–]Braingasms -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Another strawman, no facts to back up the assumptions being made. This is complete horse shit. This sub has devolved into an echo chamber of nonsense over the past two years, maybe a bit longer.

[–]xVoluntasx 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Wasn't there a movie about this?

[–]Sagittarius_92 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Its not enough to just fight the legal fight for men's rights but also provide them with social support by educating men on how to deal with situations at home and help them learn how not to depend too much on women for emotional support. For that on a societal level some platforms needs to be created where men can fulfill their emotional, mental needs. A place where they won't be judged for being man and having masculine needs. For example a recreation space where they can pull away from overwhelming situations in life or a club where men can discuss their issues with like minded people.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The case may be complicated in law - we don't know the details - but the children will know of this gesture. The point is, the mother tried to deny the father even this gesture. The gesture was allowed, thank goodness, and the children can make their own minds up in future.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Shupa powa idnia 2021

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter