TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • Other

      • /r/AllPillDebate
      • /r/AlreadyRed
      • /r/altTRP
      • /r/AntiFeminists
      • /r/askFDS
      • /r/askMRP
      • /r/askRPC
      • /r/becomeaman
      • /r/BlackPillScience
      • /r/Chadfish
      • /r/Divorce_Men
      • /r/EverydayMisandry
      • /r/ExRedPill
      • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
      • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
      • /r/GEOTRP
      • /r/MalePsychology
      • /r/Male_Studies
      • /r/MenSupportMen
      • /r/MGTOW2
      • /r/MuslimRedPill
      • /r/newTRP
      • /r/PussyPass
      • /r/PussyPassDenied
      • /r/RedPillBooks
      • /r/RedPillParenting
      • /r/RedPillWives
      • /r/RedPillWomen
      • /r/RedPillWorkplace
      • /r/RPChristians
      • /r/ThankTRP
      • /r/TheRedPillStories
      • /r/trpGAME
      • /r/TRPOffTopic
      • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
      • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • A Voice for Men
    • Dalrock
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Heartiste
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • Return of Kings
    • The Power Moves
    • The Rational Male
    • The Spearhead
    • Other

      • Alpha Game
      • Archwinger
      • Artful Prudence
      • Black Label Logic
      • Caleb Jones
      • Captain Capitalism
      • Corporate Machiavelli
      • Days of Game
      • Deep Strength
      • Dicipres
      • Donal Graeme
      • Female Misogynist
      • Free Northerner
      • Gaming My Wife
      • Hawaiian Libertarian
      • Illimitable Men
      • In Mala Fide
      • Kill Your Inner Loser
      • KillToParty
      • Krauser PUA
      • LaidNYC
      • NO MA'AM
      • Omega Virgin Revolt
      • Pook's Mill
      • Random Xpat Rantings
      • Red Pill Theory
      • Red Pill Wifery
      • RedPillDad
      • RedPillDoctor
      • Rian Stone
      • RooshV
      • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
      • Sigma Frame
      • The Feminine Woman
      • The Futurist
      • The Masculine Principle
      • The Modern Man
      • The New Modern Man
      • The Obsidian Files
      • The Private Man
      • The Red Pill Room
      • The Red Quest
      • The Rules Revisited
      • Troy Francis
      • Wintery Knight
      • Woujo
      • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Support

Critically important TIME article -- but the backlash is starting. Let your voice be heard

PierceHarlan

March 20, 2014
209 upvotes
/r/MensRights

http://time.com/30545/its-time-to-end-rape-culture-hysteria/

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Support the archive

Everything here was supposed to disappear. Banned subreddits, deleted communities, cancelled blogs — much of what is archived here survives nowhere else.

It stays free — no paywall, no account — for the next man who comes looking, the way it was free for you.

I pay for the servers, the storage and the bandwidth myself. If you want this record still standing in ten years, become one of the people who keeps it online.

Support the archive

Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title Critically important TIME article -- but the backlash is starting. Let your voice be heard
Author

PierceHarlan

Upvotes 209
Comments 72
Date March 20, 2014 8:11 PM UTC
(12 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/20xllo/critically_important_time_article_but_the/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/critically-important-time-article-but-the-backlash.1002525
https://theredarchive.com/post/1002525
Top posts by PierceHarlan

Claim: College tells suicidal male student accused of sexual assault he can't have counseling--because his accuser was using those resources

2959 upvotes
January 14, 2016
/r/MensRights

Boy and girl, both 16, have consensual sex--only the boy faces statutory rape charges

2498 upvotes
March 17, 2016
/r/MensRights

Woman jailed after 11th false rape claim in a decade

2264 upvotes
February 26, 2013
/r/MensRights

The War on College Men Goes Too Far: 28 Harvard Law Profs Voice Their Strong Objections to the School's One-Sided, Feminist-Inspired Sexual Misconduct Policies

1530 upvotes
October 15, 2014
/r/MensRights

Woman falsely accused boy of rape because 'she requires attention, even if it's negative'--but she won't go to jail

1414 upvotes
January 22, 2016
/r/MensRights

Woman falsely accuses man she barely knew of rape in order to reconcile with her mother, turns his life into a living hell

1379 upvotes
February 24, 2015
/r/MensRights

When rape charges are dropped, it's not appropriate to call the accuser 'the victim'

1211 upvotes
September 17, 2013
/r/MensRights

Hillary Clinton hires woman who thinks it's much better to falsely accuse a man of rape than to disbelieve an accuser

1175 upvotes
February 15, 2016
/r/MensRights

Comments

[–]nathan1942 26 points27 points28 points 12 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

"RAINN urges the White House to “remain focused on the true cause of the problem” and suggests a three-pronged approach for combating rape: empowering community members through bystander intervention education, using “risk-reduction messaging” to encourage students to increase their personal safety, and promoting clearer education on “where the ‘consent line’ is.” It also asserts that we should treat rape like the serious crime it is by giving power to trained law enforcement rather than internal campus judicial boards."

Tell people to act if they are witnessing sexual violence, encourage individuals to be responsible for their own safety, and help clarify what is and is not consent.

I think this is the perfect approach. Finally they stop blaming men and start blaming the rapists instead.

[–]Darkling5499 10 points11 points12 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

encourage individuals to be responsible for their own safety

but..but... that's rape apology at it's finest!!! /s

[–]Raudskeggr 4 points5 points6 points 12 years ago* (3 children) | Copy Link

Yes, that's all well and good, but how does this help attract campaign donations for Clinton's 2015 White House run?

In all seriousness, though, this is the indication of how things are shifting. Political zeitgeist is a bit like a pendulum, with the popular attitudes shifting from left to right over time. Things have for a period shifted very far left, to the point where the radical elements of feminism have had tremendous success in getting their ideas accepted by much of society; but the consequences of their extremist insanity inevitably produces backlash among people who are more clearly able to see the downside of their radicalism.

You are seeing more and more the indications of that backlash. And that is the key to knowing where the moderate voter is; those moderates who are the key to Presidential elections. I think the Democratic strategists are ill-advised to let the radfem inmates run their asylum this close to an election cycle, because it is going to cause a lot of otherwise liberal people to shift their votes elsewhere.

[–]PrimesteFericera 2 points3 points4 points 12 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I don't know much about the history of politics, but you have any sources talking about the pendulum idea? It's interesting you mention that, because it really goes along with how I've been feeling lately. I consider myself somewhat left, but lately I've been wondering what the heck is going on. The tea party was bad for the Republicans, but now I feel there's this swelling faction of insanity on the left as well and I'm much more in the middle.

[–]Raudskeggr 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Sources? That is just my personal observation, based on my own knowledge of history and political attitudes.

[–]PrimesteFericera 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I see. That's okay then. I just like to have links to articles and such.

[–]baskandpurr -2 points-1 points0 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Empowering community members through bystander intervention education

Encourage men to fight over women.

Using “risk-reduction messaging” to encourage students to increase their personal safety

Remind women that they should be worried about rape.

Promoting clearer education on “where the ‘consent line’ is

Broaden the definition of rape to include drunken sex many other things.

[–]unbannable9412 21 points22 points23 points 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

it’s almost invisible

A convenient description of "rape culture" for feminists.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Everything about feminism is dogmatic. It's a religion. They point to vague, thrice-translated "studies" about rape (Koss), and claim there's an invisible force that affects everyone at all times, and if you can't see it you're obviously an apologist (heretic, devil-worshipper, etc.).

[–]HolySchmoly 86 points87 points88 points 12 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Rape is caused by rapists, not by men. Teaching men not to rape is making men feel ashamed of themselves for being men.

Male shame is female power. It has nothing to do with preventing rape. It has everything to do with empowering women.

[–]hugolp 10 points11 points12 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Shaming men its not all the womens objective. It does not empower all women. Its the objective of a subset of miserable women known as feminists.

[–]Canadianman22 2 points3 points4 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I did not have to be taught not to rape, I heard the definition of rape and knew it was wrong for ANYONE to do. The thing that stuck with me most was an episode of Law&Order SVU called Ridicule (Season 3 Episode 10). It deals specifically with a man being raped, and the stigma and ridicule that men get when they report they have been raped.

[–]nigglereddit 6 points7 points8 points 12 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Correct.

But not all women, just feminists. It's the inevitable result of gaining power.

"Power is not a means; it is an end. One does not establish a dictatorship in order to safeguard a revolution; one makes the revolution in order to establish the dictatorship ... The object of power is power."

[–]HolySchmoly 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Thanks. But are you sure. The object of power is power? In the dictator's mind, or in the observers? I think Stalin may have been genuine. Just a bastard.

[–]TrouserTorpedo 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

A delusional power-hungry person who doesn't realise the effects of their delusion still wants power to dictate their particular version of morality onto the world.

Even if Stalin's motivations were (in his mind) egalitarian, that doesn't mean his objective wasn't the power to enact them.

[–]alphabetmod 27 points28 points29 points 12 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

I'm calling it now... RAINN will be forced to issue some kind of apology/backtracking bullshit statement in a matter of days or weeks because of all the pressure feminists will be putting on them because they dared to tell the truth. The truth that "rape culture" is feminist hysteria that never has and never will exist outside of the worst prisons.

I don't want it to happen... but when have the legions of whiny feminists not gotten their way on the issue of controlling public discourse?

[–]PierceHarlan[S] 21 points22 points23 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It would be like trying to un-ring a bell. I hope and pray that RAINN doesn't side with ideologue extremist loons, and that's what those folks are. Put me on the "hate list" again for saying it, but that's what they are. My blog got put on the SPLC's hate list once -- for saying what RAINN is saying now. When I read RAINN's letter, I thought I had written it. My, oh, my. Who's the extremist and who's the adult in the discussion?

[+][deleted] 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]housebrickstocking 7 points8 points9 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I've seen reputatable publications shake that off before... but it was so long ago...

[+][deleted] 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]PrimesteFericera 2 points3 points4 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That would be nice if they did.

[–]Kuato2012 1 point2 points3 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It'll be interesting to watch this unfold. I'm expecting three parts backlash and one part backpedaling/historical revisionism; that is, some people are going to pretend that the rape hysteria strain of feminism didn't actually need to be reined in because it was perfectly in line with RAINN's statement all along.

[–]Ging287 1 point2 points3 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

http://archive.is/z9Fe2 (An archive link just in case it DOES get deleted)

[–]alphabetmod 12 points13 points14 points 12 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

The most appalling part about feminists getting upset about RAINN's statement is the fact that they're upset that a leading organization in the fight against rape and sexual violence (RAINN) is trying to steer the conversation in a direction that will actually help the victims of sexual violence. They'd rather have RAINN continue to misrepresent the facts, and pander to bullshit feminist ideals that have no basis in reality. The ones that don't actually help the victims of sexual assault, than admit that "rape culture" is bullshit.

[–]PrimesteFericera 2 points3 points4 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

But they don't want to hear it. They want to remain victims and relish in the terror and fear of imagined, constant, impending rape so they can all complain on their blogs. It's gotten to where on Tumblr girls are claiming that catcalling and all piv (penis in vagina) sex is equivalent to rape. I have never heard an ACTUAL rape victim say those things, so that speaks for itself imo.

[–]TRPACC 11 points12 points13 points 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Mine

JamesFullman 4 minutes ago @valenciapilgrim32 Its rape hysteria - like progressive era rape hysteria, witch-hunt hysteria, satanic cult hysteria and so onEdit (in 1 minute)

[–]PrimesteFericera 4 points5 points6 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Oh that was you! I totally agree.

[–]Trunk-Monkey 11 points12 points13 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Kudos to RAINN for their recent recomendations and kudos to Time for publishing oposition to the critisizm RAINN is recieving about it... and not just because I don't want my boys grow up in a culture where they are guilty by accusation, but because equality and stoping violence are prefferable to villifying half of the population!

[–]HannasAnarion 9 points10 points11 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This deserves to be on the front page forever.

[–]rightsbot 5 points6 points7 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Post text automatically copied here. (Why?) (Report a problem.)

[–]AusNation 6 points7 points8 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

How the hell is it possible that feminists haven't already infiltrated all sexual violence organisations?

I would have thought that there'd be no place more hostile to voice these opinions. Kudos to the author

[–]whinemoreplease 3 points4 points5 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Fantastic summary from a reputable source citing a highly influential organization. I instantly posted this on my facebook (to whatever little good that does). I wish I could upvote it more.

[–]dungone 15 points16 points17 points 12 years ago (31 children) | Copy Link

I will wait until they acknowledge that women commit a huge portion of rape. That's really the end of this entire conversation.

[–]-Fender- 7 points8 points9 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That was my only issue with this article. They made more sense than the majority of things in mainstream media on this subject, but nothing they said or implied could allude to the fact that women are responsible for a very large proportion of rapes, and that men are approximately 50% of the victims of rape outside of prison.

[–]PrimesteFericera 6 points7 points8 points 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Or that the "rape culture" might be a better label for what happens in (mostly male filled) prisons.

[–]dungone 2 points3 points4 points 12 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

It's fitting for the way they themselves treat all male victims, all female rapists, and all false accusers. They're focusing on the one area where there isn't a cultural problem while actually causing the problem and preventing it from being dealt with fairly everywhere else.

[–]Xaendrik 4 points5 points6 points 12 years ago (18 children) | Copy Link

Women commit a huge portion of rape?

[–]Fintago 6 points7 points8 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Often they redefine rape as requiring penetration of the victim. Which removes most female on male and female on female rape.

[–]-Fender- 6 points7 points8 points 12 years ago (15 children) | Copy Link

Eeyup.

[–]sp00kes -3 points-2 points-1 points 12 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link

Except the CDC says the data was misinterpreted.

http://manboobz.com/2013/10/29/cdc-mra-claims-that-40-of-rapists-are-women-are-based-on-bad-math-and-misuse-of-our-data/comment-page-10/

[–]oneiorosgrip 7 points8 points9 points 12 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

The CDC also says it's not rape when a man is raped by a woman.

They've admitted to manipulating the data, then released it under stipulations that nobody but gender issues researchers, likely to manipulate it the same way as they did, can have it. The credibility of the claim that the data was misinterpreted is questionable. If the CDC really had evidence to counter that graphic, they should release that to the general public in its raw form so that others don't have to rely on claims from researchers who have already been caught lying about whether rape is rape when it happens to a man.

[–]tessie999 -1 points0 points1 point 12 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

It also compares lifetime numbers to 12-month numbers. The 40% figure is wrong even when you include being 'forced to penetrate'. The math is bad. There have been a LOT of rebuttals to this...and not just by the CDC.

Male rape IS wrong (when they are forced to penetrate/forcibly penetrated) but using incorrectly manipulated statistics and bad math isn't going to help to show this - it only de-franchises the MRM and confuses. And anyway, who cares if male rape is less than/equal to/more than female rape? It's rape. It's bad. It should be fought no matter the gender. Just because male rape may be less prevalent doesn't make it a non-issue and it's an issue the MRM is/should be dedicated to fighting.

[–]oneiorosgrip 4 points5 points6 points 12 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

The CDC could honestly rebut this by releasing numbers that show the percentage of male respondents who reported being made to penetrate by either sex in 2010. They have steadfastly refused to do that. They talked all the way around the concept, but have kept those numbers secret from the general public.

Feminists attempt to use claims that female on male perpetration in both intimate partner and domestic violence are rare in comparison to male perpetration as an excuse to fight against efforts to assist victims and address perpetration.

They've used statistics on female victimization from these surveys to portray male perpetration as widespread and common, under the same logic that was used in that graphic, treating the number of victims as their indicating factor. I hope they criticize the hell out of this for months, sticking their necks out as far as they can on it, because it'll make great fodder for a piece tearing apart the logic behind claims of an epidemic of male perpetration.

[–]tessie999 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

They might not have the % for whatever reason.

I personally think feminism can focus on women if it wants - people on /r/MensRights sometimes argue that feminism claims to be for both genders and therefore SHOULD help male victims...but the general consensus appears to be that feminism - even if some claim it does - doesn't focus on both genders equally. It focuses on the victimisation of women. We cannot dictate how another movement is run. We can criticise it but we cannot make the whole movement do what we want.

My point on the female-on-male vs male-on-female is that even if it is rarer is that it doesn't matter. Using bad math to make it more equal isn't going to help and only discredits the movement. It doesn't matter if only 2 men are victims of F-on-M rape (obviously a completely wrong thing - it's just a hyperbolic example) - the MRM is here to make sure those 2 men have shelters by funding and supporting them. Those 2 men deserve the MRM fighting for the laws to change to formally recognise them as victims in their court case. Those 2 men want the MRM to fight for awareness on F-on-M rape: even if they are only 2, they are 2 too many.

That's why there's the MRM. To focus on men.

[–]oneiorosgrip 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

They might not have the % for whatever reason.

No, if they have a number, and they have reporting on perpetration by gender, there's a %. It's not that they don't have it. It's that they're choosing to not report it.

I personally think feminism can focus on women if it wants

The argument isn't just that feminism focuses on women. It's that feminist activists strive to erase men's issues from public discourse wherever female behavior is implicated as a cause (such as female perpetration of intimate partner or sexual violence,) or wherever addressing those issues comes into conflict with feminist ideology (such as their advocacy that attacks due process rights in criminal court when a man or boy is accused of a sex crime against a woman or girl, or their advocacy against equally shared parenting laws, wherein their entire argument rests on demonizing fathers as deadbeats and abusers.)

If all feminism did was focus on women, it wouldn't be so bad. It's the malicious organized feminist focus on men and boys and the dodgy feminists-who-don't-do-anything focus on excusing that with NAFALT arguments that are the real problems that MRAs have with feminists.

It doesn't matter if only 2 men are victims of F-on-M rape (obviously a completely wrong thing - it's just a hyperbolic example) - the MRM is here to make sure those 2 men have shelters by funding and supporting them.

Feminists have successfully used arguments that men and boys represent smaller numbers of victims - numbers that exaggeratedly small, actually - to lobby for laws and policy that fund feminist initiatives for women to the exclusion of men, which target men with demonization and attacks on civil rights. I wrote a little about the history of that effort in two A Voice For Men articles, "Abused boys and men, feminism's acceptable losses", and , "Feminists define rape to exclude male victims" which both contain links to back up what I've written.

Feminists lied in four ways which have all been very damaging to society. First, they exaggerated female victimization. Second, they deliberately obscured male victimization. Third, they treated the claim that male victimization is rare as if it justified ignoring male victims. Fourth, they treated exaggeration of female victimization as evidence of male perpetration and therefor justification for treating men as only perpetrators of intimate partner and sexual violence, and as mostly deadbeats in the fields of parenting and head of household. Based on that advocacy, the U.S. congress has been passing laws which chip away at due process rights for men accused of intimate partner and sexual violence, and have created a system within the justice system that by design funnels men (innocent and guilty alike) into jails and prisons around the country.
Believe me, it matters.

If the MRM focuses on the symptom (the things that are happening to men) without addressing the illness (the causes behind those things that are happening to men) the movement will have no success in protecting men from those discriminatory attacks, and we will be talking about these same problems 20 years from now, wondering why they can't be solved.

[–]dungone 2 points3 points4 points 12 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

The source of the 40% figure went into great detail about the differences between the 12 month and lifetime prevalence rates, pointing out the obvious and crippling flaws in the way in which the CDC was using them to improperly compare men's and women's prevalence rates. So it's funny, like a pot calling the kettle black, to have the CDC study authors come back and lecture us about good math. And, no, absolutely no one has even attempted to rebut the actual claims made by 40% source, let alone done so successfully. Like you just did here, they all relied on strawmen arguments and begging the question. And so did the CDC, in their own attempt to rebut the 40% figure. It's shameful and astonishing of anyone claiming to be interested in using good math and statistics.

The fact of the matter is that the source of the 40% figure was forced to make the comparison that it did, but for very solid, well-understood reasons that it was absolutely transparent about. The source made it perfectly clear that there appeared to be an ideological agenda at work here, with the CDC hiding data that it should have otherwise released for the sake of completeness.

The CDC's "rebuttal" was even more of a joke because if they legitimately wanted to "fix" or "rebut" the 40% figure, they could have simply offered up the data which they themselves refused to publish. Instead they wrote a meandering screed which attacked strawmen and provided us with a bunch of ad-hominems about being able to understand math. It's perfectly clear that it is them who neither understood the flaws in their own data, nor the need to publish an objective set of statistics. But what would you expect? They got called out on looking like they were being biased and their rebuttal simply proved that they were, in fact, dishonest and biased.

[–]tessie999 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

The CDC said

According to the web links, the “40% of rapists were women” was derived from these two steps:

1)Combining the estimated number of female rape victims with the estimated number of being-made-to-penetrate male victims in the 12 months prior to the survey to conclude that about 50% of the rape or being-made-to-penetrate victims were males;

2) Multiplying the estimated percentage (79%) of male being-made-to-penetrate victims who reported having had female perpetrators in these victims’ lifetime with the 50% obtained in step 1 to claim that 40% of perpetrators of rape or being-made-to-penetrate were women. None of these calculations should be used nor can these conclusions be correctly drawn from these calculations. Regarding the specific assertion in question, several aspects of mistreatments of the data and the published estimates occurred in the above derivation:

A. While the percentage of female rape victims and the percentage of male being-made-to-penetrate victims were inferred from the past 12-month estimates by combining two forms of violence, the percentage of perpetrator by sex was taken from reported estimates for males for lifetime (a misuse of the percentage of male victims who reported only female perpetrators in their lifetime being made to penetrate victimization). This mismatch of timeframes is incorrect because the past 12-month victimization cannot be stretched to equate with lifetime victimization. In fact, Table 2.1 and 2.2 of the NISVS 2010 Summary Report clearly report that lifetime rape victimization of females (estimated at 21,840,000) is about 4 times the number of lifetime being made-to-penetrate of males (estimated at 5,451,000).

B. An arithmetic confusion appears when multiplying the two percentages together to conclude that the product is a percentage of all the “rapists”, an undefined perpetrator population. Multiplying the percentage of male victims (as derived in step 1) above) to the percentage of male victims who had female perpetrators cannot give a percentage of perpetrators mathematically because to get a percentage of female rape perpetrators, one must have the total rape perpetrators (the denominator), and the number of female perpetrators of this specific violence (the numerator). Here, neither the numerator nor the denominator was available.

C.Data collected and analyzed for the NISVS 2010 have a “one-to-multiple” structure (where the “one” refers to one victim and the “multiple” refers to multiple perpetrators). While not collected, it is conceivable that any perpetrator could have multiple victims. These multiplicities hinder any attempt to get a percentage of perpetrators such as the one described in steps 1) and 2), and nullify the reverse calculation for obtaining a percent of perpetrators.

For example, consider an example in which a girl has eight red apples while a boy has two green apples. Here, 50% of the children are boys and another 50% are girls. It is not valid to multiply 50% (boy) with 100% (boy’s green apples) to conclude that “50% of all the apples combined are green”. It is clear that only 20% of all the apples are green (two out of 10 apples) when one combines the red and green apples together. Part of the mistake in the deriving of the “50%” stems from a negligence to take into account the inherent multiplicity: a child can have multiple apples (just as a victim can have multiple perpetrators).

D. As the study population is U.S. adults in non-institutional settings, the sample was designed to be representative of the study population, not the perpetrator population (therefore no sampling or weighting is done for the undefined universe of perpetrators). Hence, while the data can be analyzed to make statistical inferences about the victimization of U.S. adults residing in non-institutional settings, the NISVS data are incapable of lending support to any national estimates of the perpetrator population, let alone estimates of perpetrators of a specific form of violence (say, rape or being-made-to-penetrate).

E. Combining the estimated past 12-month female rape victims with the estimated past 12-month being-made-to-penetrate male victims cannot give an accurate number of all victims who were either raped or being-made-to-penetrate, even if this combination is consistent with CDC’s definition.

Besides a disagreement with the definitions of the various forms of violence given in the NISVS 2010 Summary Report, this approach of combining the 12-month estimated number of female rape victims with the 12-month estimated number of male victims misses victims in the cells where reliable estimates were not reported due to small cell counts failing to meet statistical reliability criteria. For any combined form of violence, the correct analytical approach for obtaining a national estimate is to start at the raw data level of analysis, if such a creation of a combined construct is established.

This is JUST the CDC. THere are countless separate youtube videos and websites from before the CDC even published their rebuttal to this score. I linked one to typhonblue when they first posted about it and they commented after saying whatever the video said didn't matter because it wasn't "academic" (ie: in a written format). It's somewhere in the very early history of my comments if you want to sift through.

[–]dungone 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

It's nice that you could list their entire response for everyone to see here. But you seem to be posting it unthinkingly, without actually addressing a single point that has been made about it, and it itself was ignoring every single point actually made by the source of the 40% figure. So you've got nothing. Apparently you're going with an argument from popularity/authority. We can reject your argument until you actually come up with a real response to the claims made in the original 40% source.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 12 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

And anyway, who cares if male rape is less than/equal to/more than female rape? It's rape. It's bad. It should be fought no matter the gender. Just because male rape may be less prevalent doesn't make it a non-issue and it's an issue the MRM is/should be dedicated to fighting.

Sorry but that's not enough.

Everyone who hasn't succumbed to their ideological binders knows this.

The problem is, you use this argument and you'll just get hit with the same old BS that "Men are the majority perpetrators, women the majority victims" along with the same old faulty data supporting that counter argument.

And you know what? Society continues to eat it up. Governments and organizations flock to it, accept it, and allow it to dictate how funds are allocated and which gender should receive empathy and support.

I share your sentiment, I really do. But that's just not enough to fight against the perception that domestic violence and sexual abuse is what men do to women.

If we had some better research then it would give us a leg up. But we don't so, to them, we lose.

[–]tessie999 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I personally believe that (outside of prisons where men are victimised more) that women are raped more and most of these perpetrators are men. I don't think this devalues the concept of male rape. Even if you go by 40% (which I personally think is inflated and based on bad maths but let's accept it for the purpose of discussion) it is still just a large minority. Society can think whatever - they don't really like the MRM as it stands so honestly the MRM can do no right until they do something that is hard to do but incredibly right (such as getting the laws changed to accept men being forced to penetrate).

Governments will not change their minds based on this statistic. It will not change the masses that google and find all the debunks. They will change for demonstrations, marches, raising awareness, ect. I don't think we'll ever really be able to get a proper research paper on this until the rape laws change to include 'forced to penetrate'. Otherwise they will default and the numbers will be easier confused/inflated. If the laws are changed first then the studies are FORCED to include it.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Governments will not change their minds based on this statistic. It will not change the masses that google and find all the debunks. They will change for demonstrations, marches, raising awareness, ect.

That's what the movement has been doing for the past decade and yet society is continuing on its merry path to fucking over male survivors.

"I don't think we'll ever really be able to get a proper research paper on this until the rape laws change to include 'forced to penetrate'."

Good luck trying to even get these organizations to listen, let alone concede (though RAINN has responded positively to the movement's concerns on their statistic gathering).

I agree that the CDC is faulty. Why do you think I added "If we had some better research"?

But until then, every time you bring up the concern for Male Victims, expect to have their statistics thrown in your face and shouted down due to "Women are the majority victims".

That devalues male rape, by the way. I'll explain later in a new thread at some point. But let's just say bringing that up everytime the subject of male survivors is broached, it aids and abbetts the current narrative that men are oppressors and women are victims, boys are mean and girls are all sugar and spice and everything nice so they couldn't possibly do any harm (GO GRRL POWER, RAH RAH RAH!)

[–]tessie999 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It takes more than a decade to make change.

I personally think women are the majority of rape victims. I have no problem with people using that as an argument because you can simply reply "does that make them the only ones?" It doesn't matter who is raped more. Having less male victims doesn't devalue them - it makes them rarer, but not meaningless. It is going to take a long time for people to recognise men as victims due to the long history of our gender roles and male disposability. One cannot possibly except change within a single decade of a movement - I don't think any movement has managed to make significant change in a decade.

I don't really believe in the "sugar and spice" theory. But that's a different discussion altogther.

[–]dungone 6 points7 points8 points 12 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

Haha, yeah... Their non-rebuttal and manboobz plagiarizing for full comedic effect.

Seriously, though, it was obvious from the original CDC report that the study authors had a debilitating ideological bias and thus were unwilling to present their own data in an objective way. They weren't willing to release their raw data, and then in their "rebuttal" they bitched about how the breakdowns which they did publish were designed to make it as difficult as possible to get solid numbers on female rapists. Yea, so? We already knew that. That's not a rebuttal of the 40% figure, that's an admission of deep ideological flaws in the way the CDC presented their data. How ironic.

But even then, the rest of their "rebuttal" was so breathtakingly bad that I'm surprised that the people who wrote it would be allowed anywhere near a study or statistical analysis of any sort.

[–]-Fender- 1 point2 points3 points 12 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

Well, it does have some good information. But the only thing they said that could even slightly affect the numbers in the infographic is that a victim might have been raped multiple times, and not necessarily always by the same gender. If there was any other information of substance in the post, then feel free to correct me. But it still looks like a nearly 50/50 distribution of victims of rape.

Not really sure why the author of this text makes such a big deal out of "Oh noes, MRAs have used numbers! And they may have made a slightly unrepresentative claim as to the perpetrators of rape while the number they gave about the victims was accurate! They have completely ruined all possible rational discussion that could be had on this subject!" either.

Edit: Spelling.

[–]xtremeradness 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

We need some sort of source for this, otherwise we are no better than finger-pointing hypocrites.

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point 12 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

The source is actually BS. The CDC has refuted this several times, since the math is really, really, incorrect.

EDIT: Jesus guys, I didn't know this sub turned into such a circlejerk. Feel free to ignore contradictory evidence, but it won't make the truth change.

[–]brinkofhumor -1 points0 points1 point 12 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Do you have a stat for that? Not that I'm calling bullshit, but I'd love to have that for future debates.

[–]-Fender- 5 points6 points7 points 12 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Enjoy.

[–]brinkofhumor 2 points3 points4 points 12 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Oh. My. God. thank you.

[–][deleted] -3 points-2 points-1 points 12 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

Hate to be that guy, but this is severely misinterpreted data.

CDC statisticians have attempted to point out the major flaws in the math here.

[–]brinkofhumor 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

yeah, I googled it when I got it...drat.

[–]astrokid -2 points-1 points0 points 12 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

I would add that we need to breakdown all those 'forced to penetrate' and 'forced penetration' figures into different types. how much of that is 1st degree rape? i.e forced to have sex at knifepoint etc? how much is 2nd degree? and so on. If 1.27 Million men are getting raped each year.. and a similar number of women.. and yet there is no psychological damage that has devastated the nation.. surely it means we shouldnt be saying rape is a horrific crime

[–]adorkable93 3 points4 points5 points 12 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Call me crazy, but I don't think boys and men need to be taught not to rape. We don't have to teach kids not to murder people, do we? RAINN said it perfectly with, "promoting clearer education on "where the 'consent line' is."" This is just my opinion, but the problem isn't with boys thinking rape is okay. The problem is that many boys and girls don't really know, or haven't been taught, what qualifies as rape. A lot (not a majority) of boys and girls think that there's no such thing as raping your girlfriend, or someone you've had sex with before. And people still argue over whether or not consenting when you're drunk is really consent. All I'm saying is that there are a lot of situations that a person without proper education would consider a "gray area" or even acceptable when it isn't. The sooner we all realize that this perceived "rape culture" is really a lack of proper education, for both boys and girls, the better.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Call me crazy, but I don't think boys and men need to be taught not to rape.

You're the opposite of crazy (for us at least).

The problem is that many boys and girls don't really know, or haven't been taught, what qualifies as rape(...)The sooner we all realize that this perceived "rape culture" is really a lack of proper education, for both boys and girls, the better.

This is a very important point. It's about boundaries as it's not just rape. A person who understands and respects other people's boundaries will almost never see him/herself in a situation of being a rapist or scammer or whatever. Even if the other person is not saying "no", he/she will understand that the other person does not want it if the body language signals are clear enough (and they are in the vast majority of cases). It's true that people sometimes, mostly women, do play hard to get and the man has to push a bit, but the body language, the tone, the words used, are a whole lot different than when the other person is not giving any consent or hope or anything. It also works the other way around and the same stands.

Education is key. It's not about "teach your boys not to rape", but rather, "teach your children to respect other people's boundaries". Do you know how you do that? You actually teach your children to have boundaries themselves...and you respect those boundaries.

[–]TRPACC 2 points3 points4 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

We don't have to teach kids not to murder people, do we?

We teach kids not be violent towards other kids from the get go.

[–]Kuato2012 3 points4 points5 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Back when I used to try having meaningful conversation and debate with feminists, I got variously called a rape apologist or a rapist in waiting for saying the exact same things RAINN just did. I'll not hold my breath waiting for any apologies.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 12 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

Somebody should tell Jessica that even she acknowledges that rape culture isn't part of American culture; if rape is as American as Apple pie than it's not very American, because Apple pie has its roots in the 1300's.

History isn't a strong point of Jessica's.

[–]PrimesteFericera 2 points3 points4 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

One of the comments on the article mentioned the satanic cult hysteria and witch hunt hysterias of the past. I thought that was interesting. Right now everyone's all worked up but 20 years down the road we'll realize we were fighting an invisible monster.

I'm so glad to see a mainstream news source talking about this.

[–]Raudskeggr 1 point2 points3 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Prepare for the backlash of rustled jimmies.

[–]YetAnotherCommenter 1 point2 points3 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

A great article.

Whilst our culture has SOME memes/expectations/beliefs which CAN (even if unintentionally) make life easier for rapists, blaming men/masculinity for this is inane.

The primary cause of rape is a small handfull of sociopaths. Target them and imprison them and hold them accountable.

Consent education is good but only addresses a small part of rape.

[–]leftofcentaur 1 point2 points3 points 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

My one criticism is that this article still makes the assumption that all rapists are male.

[–]TheThng 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Baby steps IMHO.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter