~ archived since 2018 ~
Popular
Other
K9crafts-123
[–]SuspiciousFragrance 1407 points1408 points1409 points 5 years ago (237 children) | Copy Link
Her value is fine.
Some potential partners will agree. Some potential partners will not desire a partner with a high body count. And that is fine, too.
Just as no one can judge her desires, she does not get to judge anyone else's - even if it means that someone else does not desire her, for any reason of their own.
[–]FuckRedditsADMIN 398 points399 points400 points 5 years ago (158 children) | Copy Link
Exactly this.
however i think its fair to say the number of people not wanting a high body count, far exceed those who would consider it a "plus".
hence by simple supply and demand, all things being equal, having a high body count lowers the pool of your customer base, and hence your overall market worth.
[–]Torquemada1970 73 points74 points75 points 5 years ago (127 children) | Copy Link
I would suggest that it's more a case of not wanting a body count higher than theirs
[–]_INCompl_ 57 points58 points59 points 5 years ago (117 children) | Copy Link
More a case of if you can’t count it on two hands then it’s too much. For me at least. It’s a values thing more than anything else. I don’t do one night stands or anything like that and only sleep with people I’m in a relationship with since I value sex as more than just some throwaway thing you do when you get bored. Someone that’s slept with a dozen people likely doesn’t feel the same.
[–]itsmstbetheazz 59 points60 points61 points 5 years ago (23 children) | Copy Link
They all say, “I don’t do one-night stands” until Saturday night.
[–]NotNotLogical 4 points5 points6 points 5 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Lmao that commenter is too righteous for ONS
[–]king_of_the_potato_p 4 points5 points6 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
TiL its being righteous to not have a high body count and to not do one night stands.
[–]abrotherseamus -5 points-4 points-3 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Nah dude I'm sure women are throwing sex at this guy all the time, he's just too morally upstanding for it.
[+]abrotherseamus -12 points-11 points-10 points 5 years ago (16 children) | Copy Link
This asshole has never had the chance for a one night stand, let's be honest.
Every time you meet one of these "I only fuck when in a relationship" people, they are using it as a way to shield themselves from the mental anguish of being unable to seal the deal.
[–]ShitsAndGiggles_72 10 points11 points12 points 5 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
Nah. For me, I found it to be incredibly awkward and was more turned on with sex with people I knew. That in turn lead to longer relationships because there was a little bit of a foundation there.
It's possible those first encounters, because they turned out weird, set me up for all the rest.
[–]abrotherseamus -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
Yes, that's great, honestly I was pretty similar especially when I was younger, but you're not calling it a "values thing" as OP put it, should someone dare to have 11 sexual partners.
[–]ShwayNorris 3 points4 points5 points 5 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link
You're just plain wrong here. Just because you don't have strict values you adhere to doesn't mean other people don't. I personally know three people this applies to, one that is extreme which is a man of 36 who is still a virgin, and it is completely by choice.
Dude is good looking, makes great money as a biochemist, and has had more then enough opportunity. He simply chooses not to until/unless he gets married. The other 2 are both women also in their 30's , one of which has only had 4 sexual partners ever, the other has 1 which is her husband.
[–]squinla3 19 points20 points21 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
I agree with your logic to a certain extent but I would argue that age is a factor as well.. a 20yr old with a dozen partners vs a 40yr old with a dozen partners are very different. I would say the "value" (hate using that word) is lower for the 20yr old than it is for the 40yrd old despite their "count" being the same. I think the older you are the more reasonable it is to expect a higher count. I believe if counts are afactor (it's not for me) than it should be a ratio - yrs lived : #of partners.
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
This just isn't the case in real life, women who are 40 have very few options. Hell, women who are 30 are invisible on dating apps. They don't stop using them by choice.
I do see what you're saying with respect to there being a bigger red flag just in terms of promiscuity with the young woman but the reality is that men will be more willing to overlook it for a younger woman. If she's attractive I guarantee she can find a husband at 23 but at 40 the odds are grim.
If you dispute this I just want to point out there are many, many articles about women struggling to date in their 40s and 50s. Its commonly accepted biology. I'm not judging your preferences by the way, I'm just saying what the aggregate is.
[–][deleted] 5 years ago* (24 children) | Copy Link
[permanently deleted]
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
The issue is that she clearly isn't capable of entering into a committed relationship. If she is interested in having fun thats all well and good the concern is that that doesn't bode well for someone who wants a committed relationship.
In other words, if a woman has a track record of having superficial, non-serious relationships why would anyone commit to that. It makes no sense to commit to someone who isn't interested in and doesn't value commitment.
[–]Takingbackcontroll 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Well yeah thats the main thing for me
I dont think i have to many issues w the fact that she had a wild set of years
But where is she now. Mentally and emotionally Often they cant switch that off or are “damaged goods” so to speak, big need for attention outside the relationship etc, i stay away from that
I have a past to, as a guy, i was wild in my 20s
But i function differently today
Does she? Thats the main thing for me Often they dont Sometimes they very much do.
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
It's different with men and women because (1) men bear almost all the risk with marriage at that point and (2) men and women are affected differently from having past partners.
If a woman commits to a man when she's young she is taking a risk because she is at her most valuable. Men at that point gain the best years of a woman's looks and fertility. But at 30 plus its a totally one-sided deal. Men bear the burden of commitment and don't get much value for it. Marrying a woman over 30 doesn't make much sense in terms of expected value. Women divorce 80% of the time and the man is on the hook financially.
Obviously there can be long and healthy marriages for older people its just much less likely it will happen. Although apparently marrying too young isn't a good bet any more either.
[–]Takingbackcontroll 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Doeant bode to well for me then
I get what youre saying though
[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
No, but it'd indicate a signifigant personality difference, and signal that they'd expect sex far sooner in the relationship than I would. Not a deal breaker, but cause for concern.
[+]_INCompl_ -12 points-11 points-10 points 5 years ago (15 children) | Copy Link
If you’re single for a few years while looking for a relationship then you’re likely the problem. I don’t go looking for mindless sex when single. If I’m mentally ready to get laid after a breakup then I’m ready to put myself out there emotionally again and look for more than just sex. If you’re single for a few years and have done nothing but sleep with new people every few months, then yeah I’d say that’s whoring.
[–]Torquemada1970 6 points7 points8 points 5 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link
The existence of Tinder suggests that 'you're likely the problem' is a bit simplistic.
[–]_INCompl_ -3 points-2 points-1 points 5 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link
If you’ve struck out every single time for a few years while attempting to get in a relationship while on a dating app, then yeah I’m inclined to say that you’re the problem. It’s not that all the women this hypothetical person talks to are overly mean or whatever, it’s that this hypothetical person’s personality and demeanour are garbage and that’s why they’ve managed to stay single for years despite their best effort
[–]Torquemada1970 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
Tinder is an exclusively dating app? You need to look into this more.
[–]_INCompl_ 3 points4 points5 points 5 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
It’s what it’s marketed as and a decent amount of girls are explicitly not there for hookups as per their bio
[–]skweeky3 points 5 years ago [recovered] (3 children) | Copy Link
Did you know that people are different, there are many reasons someone might not want to be seeking a relationship, that doesn't mean you have to go without sex and it certainly doesn't make you a whore.
[–]Jaktenba 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
It may not make you a whore, but it definitely makes you a slut. You literally have no argument here, because you already made this about people who only want mindless sex (at the moment). If that type of person isn't a slut, then no one is, and maybe that's your goal, but it'll never bare fruit.
[–][deleted] 5 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]_INCompl_ 9 points10 points11 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I’ve been with my current girlfriend for 3 and a half years and counting lol I don’t “get into relationships for pussy.” If I did it’d be no different than your proposed idea of banging a new person every couple months, except with the addition of the “girlfriend” tag attached for no reason.
[–]jbx0888 -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Self delusion justified by false moralities and wishful thinking … That's why your ex cheated on you. They are all hos. Some are just more honest about it.
[–]_INCompl_ 8 points9 points10 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Couldn’t give two shits what my ex did. I haven’t so much as spoken to her in 4 years
[–]batmansthediddler -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
based
[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Yeah, that makes sense when you're 18 or whatever, but unless you stick with your best gal 4 eva then you're going to have a bit of an awakening, I would imagine.
[+]NotNotLogical -11 points-10 points-9 points 5 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link
Sounds so incel-y
[–]_INCompl_ 8 points9 points10 points 5 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link
I’ve been with my current girlfriend for 3 and a half years and our sex life is just fine, but okay. Didn’t know having a body count well into the dozens is somehow something that’s a positive thing
[–]hvilaichez -3 points-2 points-1 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
At what does a person's relationship history become their parner's business? Was I supposed to ask on the first date, or when they do that thing I'm not sure I like?
[+]NotNotLogical -7 points-6 points-5 points 5 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link
Why not? Someone could have seven 6 month relationships in that span by your weird sex negative logic.
[–]_INCompl_ 4 points5 points6 points 5 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link
I never said people can’t go ahead and sleep around, I just said it wasn’t for me and I wouldn’t consider dating someone who did. People can go ahead and do whatever, I just don’t personally feel the need to fill my life with meaningless sex
I never said people can’t go ahead and sleep around
But you then judge them for doing so, with a very shallow justification
[–]_INCompl_ 6 points7 points8 points 5 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
Correct. I’m allowed to not like certain behaviours while acknowledging that people can go ahead and do as they please. I’m not a huge fan of shooting heroin, but it’s not my place to force people to not do it if that’s what they want to do. People can do as they please and I’m allowed to not like what people do. The two things can in fact happen simultaneously
[+]markarious -8 points-7 points-6 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
That’s because it is.
[–]magnetard 5 points6 points7 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Wait, what? How?
[–]JawTn1067 -5 points-4 points-3 points 5 years ago* (8 children) | Copy Link
I don’t think most people are keeping score and if you are you’re missing the point.
Edit to clarify. I’m just saying if you are someone keeping score your values don’t line up with those who don’t and it doesn’t make sense to judge one set of subjective values against the other.
[–]Home--Builder 6 points7 points8 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Most people are in fact "keeping score" no matter how much the people that ride the cock/pussy carousel try to spin it.
[–]my-insides-hurt 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
Exactly. Too bad everyone here feels bad about themselves for having so few partners. So they'll call others disgusting for it. As if it's their right.
[–][deleted] 9 points10 points11 points 5 years ago (22 children) | Copy Link
Having a high body count increases the likelihood of one or more STDs which certainly lowers value.
[+][deleted] -8 points-7 points-6 points 5 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link
Incorrect. I’m 26F and when I was 20, I had only had sex with 3 people when someone “gifted” me. Then the dude disappeared. I had no idea and was absolutely heartbroken when I found out why. I’ve had sex with quite a few people since then and never once passed it along to anyone. I always let people know before we did the deed. I’m now engaged and still haven’t given my “gift” to my fiancé in the 5 years we’ve known each other. In conclusion, I think if you have an STD and don’t tell anyone and pass it along, that decreases your value, having an STD doesn’t. People don’t choose to get them and you shouldn’t judge someone for a shitty thing that happened to them.
[–]JakeDC 5 points6 points7 points 5 years ago* (4 children) | Copy Link
You haven't really refuted the point that in general, having a high number of partners increases the probability of having an STD. Do some people with low body counts nonetheless contract on or more STDs? Of course! Can people who absolutely whore it up manage to avoid STDs entirely? Of course! But the odds are what they are.
[–][deleted] -2 points-1 points0 points 5 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
While you have a valid point, this wasn’t the argument I was making. I was saying that someone who has an STD shouldn’t be vilified for having it when 9 times out of 10, they had no idea what they were getting into.
[–]JakeDC 7 points8 points9 points 5 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link
Oh I don't think they should be vilified in any event, so please don't misunderstand me. Vilifying someone just for having an STD seems pretty objectionable, honestly, even if they got the STD as the result of being really irresponsible and/or thoughtless.
The issue is just whether, given the odds, it is reasonable for someone to factor body count in when evaluating a potential romantic/relationship partner.
Perhaps one of the problems here is the use of the term "value". Value in the sense of "value as a human being" is different from what someone values in a partner.
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I can respect that
[–]king_of_the_potato_p -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Sorry, if you have herpes or some other never getting rid of it std your market value is at the bottom. Doesn't matter if it was one person or one time, thats all she wrote.
[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
The number is indicative of the quality, while the opposite is not necessarily true.
[–]kaskntithies 5 points6 points7 points 5 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link
People don’t choose to get them and you shouldn’t judge someone for a shitty thing that happened to them.
Now this is funny. I see this "don't judge!" tactic being used more and more (predominantly by women) to exonerate themselves from being assessed by others. Did you eat yourself into obesity and now look like a beach buoy? Well, don't judge! I didn't choose to get fat, I only chose to eat the food! That is the same logic you are using to explain having STDs, yes you didn't choose to get a disease, but your promiscuous actions with people you barely know on a surface level led to it all the same, and that is YOUR fault, not a "shitty thing that just happened".
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
Yo you wanna chill out? I was dating the dude who did this to me for a year before he disappeared on me. Do you not get intimate with your S/O after being together for a certain amount of time?
[–]kaskntithies -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
No, not when that S/O seems like the kind of dreg who would infect me with an illness and just bounce like it was nothing. You chose to elope with this individual, and there were no doubt plenty of red flags before you did the deed, no?
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
And what kind of person do you look out for when you suspect them of having an STD? Does he/she look like a robber or a hobo on an old cartoon or like Wendy from Breaking Bad?
The dude I was with had a lot going for him and he seemed like a catch. He was respectful and kind to me, he was patient and he was driven. It genuinely confused me when I found out. He took his time and by the time I finally let him get to that level of intimacy with me, he withheld that information from me. A year isn’t all that long to be together and you don’t really get to know who someone is until after about 2 years of dating. Most people have sex waaayyyy before a year, keep in mind.
[–]IntensePlatypus -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Idk, I'd still date your mom.
[–]KayJeeAy -2 points-1 points0 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I like your name very relatable since the admins in control of banning subs hasnt banned the women sub that literally has post saying kill all men but r/womanhate o something was removed. We now know they are sexists and/or simps.
[–]Homely_Bonfire 49 points50 points51 points 5 years ago (39 children) | Copy Link
The issue these days SEEMS (!) to be that many of the women who say their body count should not matter find out that the men they desire won't be willing to establish a commited realtionship the higher their body count is. Like I said, it seems to me that way.
So the question is: Are the men who are fine with a high body count the men that woman with the body count want. And I'd say: Seemingly not.
[–]ohyeahilikedat 10 points11 points12 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Exactly they dont want men with higher bodycount but THEY can have high body count. Make no sense women logic
[–][deleted] 5 years ago (36 children) | Copy Link
[–]Adamantaz 16 points17 points18 points 5 years ago (18 children) | Copy Link
Nah dude, a fucking baby comes out of a vagina and you think your dick will make it "loose"? /r/badwomensanatomy
[–][deleted] 5 years ago* (8 children) | Copy Link
[+]SultanSaatana -13 points-12 points-11 points 5 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link
If you aren't aware of the fact women are "tight" before having sex and become looser and looser if they sleep around a lot (which makes them less desirable) then the virgin is you.
[–]ShenTzuKhan 4 points5 points6 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Hi friend, I don't mean to be a dick, so just in case this isn't trolling, you are 100% wrong here. Please google it if you doubt me. A baby is a lot bigger than a dick. Doesn't matter how many sausages you push through a hole that can fit a watermelon, the hole don't change.
[–]Arkitekt9 6 points7 points8 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Jesus christ read a book im not walking you through 6th grade health class
[–]markarious 3 points4 points5 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Pretty sure he is trolling.
[–]WDoE 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Bro, the more people you talk to, the looser your lips get. If you don't shut the fuck up, they're going to end up dragging on your chin. Can't believe you're unaware of this anatomical fact.
[–]lixyna -2 points-1 points0 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
r/BadWomensAnatomy
Didn't know people like you actually exist, but here we are
[–]Hexalot 4 points5 points6 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
3/10 attempt at trolling, better luck next round!
[–]Loktarian 3 points4 points5 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Even if it's real, which i don't believe it is. The body count wouldn't matter with this argument. People in committed relationship have more amount of intercourse than people who do one night stands. You can have someone who had sex 50 times with 50 partners once and second person that had sex 1000 sex with 1 partner. How it 1st person more used than second?
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Wait, you didn't know that all vaginas are equipped with a Penile Identification Security System (codename PISS). It identifies the penis that is about to enter it, if it's gained entry before the vagina stays the same, but if it's a new D then the vagina loosens to accommodate another new partner. It's science.
[–]JawTn1067 -2 points-1 points0 points 5 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link
Experience isn’t dependent on the number of parters you’ve had. I’ve driven the same car for 8 years and it’s the only one. I really doubt I’d be a better or worse driver if I’d switched vehicles every month. I’d just know more about more cars. Also, a vehicle isn’t necessarily going to be more run down for having had more drivers if every driver had been a good steward. And if you think a woman’s experience doesn’t matter you should stay in school. Really your analogies miss on every level.
[–]hajamieli 23 points24 points25 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Yet what she's doing is judging someone else's desires, since she's apparently had conflict of interest as the consequence of her own desires.
[–]ka6emusha 20 points21 points22 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
My reply to this is always "the value of anything is based on what someone is prepared to pay for it" some people place higher value on somethings than other people do. When she meets the right person, her value will be priceless.
[–]Tapprunner 22 points23 points24 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
I also feel like most normal, well-adjusted people wouldn't think she is worth less as a human being because she may have had a high number of sexual partners. But not wanting to have sex with someone who has had sex with everyone else in town doesn't mean they have less worth as a human. It just means someone doesn't want to have sex with them.
[–]SuspiciousFragrance 4 points5 points6 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Gotta agree with you there
[–][deleted] 17 points18 points19 points 5 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
I really don't want to be forced into marrying someone who's been around too much. Let me have my own opinions ffs.
[–]harsh_2342 3 points4 points5 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Yeah same
[–]icyhotonmynuts 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Who is forcing you to marry a one-man/woman whorehouse?
[–]Tak_Jaehon -3 points-2 points-1 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Uh, who's advocating to force marriage here?
[–]robjmcm 16 points17 points18 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Lol, who tf desires a partner with a high body count.
[–]king_of_the_potato_p 14 points15 points16 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Some schmuck with a cuck fetish.
This!
[–]king_of_the_potato_p 3 points4 points5 points 5 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link
Theyve actually done surveys rather large ones if men care.
The result was more than half said their history always matters, out of the the other less than half most of them said it doesnt matter if its a hookup but for dating and relationships it does, out of that group less than a quarter said their history didn't matter at all.
Simply put to the majority of men by long and far a womans sexual past does matter if seeking a relationship.
Women will also argue saying its not fair that men care about womens pasts but not other mens. The reply is simple, most men are straight, most men are not trying to sleep with or date other men. Im sure a mans sexual past will matter to a gay man though.
[–]Tucojoe 5 points6 points7 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Well fuckin put bud
[–]SamahLama 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Imagine thinking a person will love you the same way she loved her first 3 or 4 after she's been with 50 others.
I love how people try to rationalize the degeneracy.
Eh, her value it not fine.
[+]TurtleMOOO -6 points-5 points-4 points 5 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
Every time this conversation comes up on reddit the incels show up and say girls having lots of sex does indeed lower their value. It’s extremely obnoxious to read through because you know they would love to be able to flex a double digit body count if they could
[–]TransScream 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I mean its still something you think about when you start dating, never bothers me personally (to the point they ask me first usually) I prefer anything other than basic ass missionary.
That being said, why are you judging and insulting people randomly for expressing their opinions? If it matters to them, let it matter to them.
[–]SuspiciousFragrance 4 points5 points6 points 5 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
So you are saying that men do not have the right to reject a woman, for any reason? So what if the reason is body count - it could be any reason. We all have the right to select our partners.
[–]TurtleMOOO -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Ahh yes, reading through my comment again, I see those exact words.
Shaming women for having sex isn’t the same as rejecting a woman because you don’t want to date her. This post is comparing a vagina to shoes for fucks sake. There are people in the comments saying women are like cars and men are the drivers of the cars.
[–]SuspiciousFragrance -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
So self driving cars are not such a new technology after all...
[–]Inadover -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Each time you use the expression “body count” you just sound like an incel yourself.
Are you talking about people or call of duty? Smh
[–]SippingBinJuice 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I know, right. I feel like we’re living in the 1930’s in this comment section. It’s honestly something I only thought about when I was an insecure 15 year old. I don’t understand why grown adults care about this sort of thing in 2020. Maybe they have negative assumptions because they can’t get laid?
[–]STAYotte -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I don't know, I can judge a pedophile's desires to a server degree.
What body count is considered too high though? I've fuck 20 girls since high school and chilled the fuck down since. For me, 40 to 50 different partners is fucking devious lol
[–][deleted] 164 points165 points166 points 5 years ago (22 children) | Copy Link
i joined reddit 4 months ago and well.... even if it was just 3 months ago that i found this community, the posts then used to be good compared to this
[–]OneEyedEyehole 58 points59 points60 points 5 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
All the decent subs either turn to r/pics or starts stinking of incels/racists/edgelords in general
This sub used to be about situations where an entitled female gets gotcha'd and it was usually clever or funny in some way.
Now we have various shades of 'WiMmIn BaD LuL'
[–]andreavucetich 15 points16 points17 points 5 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
I'm glad I found these comments cause I thought it was just me... But then can we report this as something that does not conform to the sub? I tried to propose this beneath a post attacking an actress without good reason and got 20 downvotes :/
[–]Turtle08atwork 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Amber Heard?
[–]dtwatts 149 points150 points151 points 5 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link
This sub has become trash
[–]chappychap1234 47 points48 points49 points 5 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
This, as a woman myself it was funny to see actual scinereos of entitled women getting shut down but now its evolved into this trash. This is not a pussy pass being denied.
[–]wildmeli 18 points19 points20 points 5 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Yeeeep. Woman here, love seeing cry baby women get shut down and put in their place. This is just comparing women to an object because she's saying she has value. Disgusting.
[–]saltydingleberry 10 points11 points12 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Man here. I would have to agree. Reminded me of that FDS sub where they constantly talk about "value".
[–]Assid_rain_ -2 points-1 points0 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Cuck
[–]saltydingleberry -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Cucksucker
[–]dtwatts 7 points8 points9 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
It’s gone down hill so much. This isn’t a pussy pass denied, this is just straight up incel bs
[–][deleted] 5 years ago* (22 children) | Copy Link
[–]Hyena_The 31 points32 points33 points 5 years ago (20 children) | Copy Link
Disgusts me that people still think that promiscuity ruins a woman's vaginal shape. the size or amount of penises or shape of the dildo will not ruin a vagina, it's fucking childbirth that does that AND EVEN THEN the vagina can recover almost entirely.
[–]hezaaaaa 30 points31 points32 points 5 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link
Ahh yes, because my 10 one night stands has destroyed my vagina compared to someone in a steady year long relationship that's had sex with their partner more than that amount
[–]Tonroz 19 points20 points21 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
That's always what's irked me . If the vagina stretched with overuse (which it fucking doesn't ) .that shit would still happen with the same dick . The vagina isn't memory foam .
[–]saltydingleberry 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Haha... Memory foam comment made me chuckle.
[–]paintballboi07 8 points9 points10 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
If it's the same penis, it doesn't count, duh! The vagina knows..
[–]78343437 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Yeah, but you ve had hundreds of dicks inside you...putting you at much higher risk of STD's.
So yeah, your vagina won't be all that.
Men come in different sizes. You have to understand this, right?
[–]Assid_rain_ 5 points6 points7 points 5 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
Its not the shape. It's the fact that 100 dicks have been in there lol. No man wants to put his dick where the rest of the village has too.
[–]MoistGrannySixtyNine 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
u/Hyena_The does. Probably cleans up after his girlfriend's boyfriend too.
[–]Hyena_The 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Nice. Useless and unoriginal just like your unhealthy obsession with other peoples lives because you're too poor to win any MTG games and too lonely to have any friends to watch the broncos with. Keep up roasting on the internet where you're safe so you can make your parents proud of the mistake they made in the Subway dumpster in the suburbs.
[–]MoistGrannySixtyNine 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Lmao struck a nerve there? What's your girlfriend's @ on Onlyfans, I'll throw her a couple of dollars for some butthile pics. I know she supports both of you, cuckboy.
[–]redhandsblackfuture 4 points5 points6 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
The size of things you're repeatedly inserting can absolutely wreck the shape or size of a vagina. Not only that, 45 year old women won't have the same vaginas they did when they were 18 despite what women repeat to themselves on Reddit. It's a muscle and its elastic, sure, but you can definitely wreck or tear or loosen your muscles.
[–][deleted] 5 years ago* (19 children) | Copy Link
[–]pwg2 87 points88 points89 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Me too. I full expected to be down voted to hell for my comment.
[–]stappernn 54 points55 points56 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
i mean this is REALLY stupid, like primary school level of stupid.
[–]throwawaycoventry79 24 points25 points26 points 5 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link
Ironic that just posting this comment in here had me auto-banned from FDS despite the comment being in line with their sentiment.
[–][deleted] 5 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 5 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]twiggy572 10 points11 points12 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
FDS is toxic. I support your comment. This poster is stupid
[–]i_accidently_reddit 4 points5 points6 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
This should be the point where you ask yourself : "I agree with fds. Where did I go wrong?"
[–]StockAL3Xj 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Seriously. This is a dumb ass post and I can only assume from the content and title that OP is an incel.
[+]SultanSaatana -16 points-15 points-14 points 5 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Found the feminist.
[–]Adamantaz 6 points7 points8 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Found the misogynist
[–]Lone-organism -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Stop dude
Actually incels are generally fine with a womans past, they're the extra thirsty ones willing to accept it.
The majority of men in every survey ever conducted say yes a womans past matters especially if they are looking for a relationship. The ones that say it doesnt matter are few and far between and most of them are the type that would be happy with any living breathing woman.
[–][deleted] 5 years ago (30 children) | Copy Link
[–]avadakabitch 55 points56 points57 points 5 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
I am genuinely shook with the amount of upvotes some fucked up comments are getting.
[–]Inadover 14 points15 points16 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
“Body count”
Bitch what’s this, call of duty?
[–]nonnarB 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I hate that term.
[–]Murderdoll197666 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I'm okay with the term being that its been around forever and its a faster slang term than just fully writing out previous partners and whatnot....but the "Owners" bit in the post is just fuckin sad. This sub is definitely going down hill these last few months.
[–]Diemme_Cosplayer 14 points15 points16 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
There's a word for that.
If you’re ever unsure about this just look at the rules. Shit’s a joke that sounds like it was written by children.
[–]jordenwuj 3 points4 points5 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
ikr and feel like the amount of incels on this sub is growing and growing...
the internet itself seems to have more crazy incels than anything else.
But this image is stupid tbh
[–]grissomza -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Yeah, seriously
[–]twiggy572 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
The sub has been taken over by woman beaters and woman haters. The mods don’t do anything here and only have a report button for “vagina hurts” versus saying something doesn’t apply
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link
In this sub? All of Reddit.
[–]TheTreeOfLiberty 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link
Lol, that's fucking rich. Feminists bash men 100x more than men bash women on this site.
[+]dutchcourage- -8 points-7 points-6 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
r/niceguys
[–]ILikeToArgueALot 3 points4 points5 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
r/nicegirls
[–]YoviQ 256 points257 points258 points 5 years ago (72 children) | Copy Link
Scraping the barrel with this one dude. Stop comparing women to inanimate objects for fuck's sakes.
[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points 5 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link
Why not when that's how they value themselves?
[–]hamster_rustler 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link
... having sex doesn’t mean you consider yourself an object. Maybe fix your outlook and you might have sex one day too
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link
Having sex with lots of people means you're letting people treat you as one so it's the same thing.
Sex without love is purely meaningless objectification.
Good luck with your future relationships. If you can even call them that.
[–]hamster_rustler 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link
Lmao, if there’s anyone I’m not going to take advice on ‘sex and love’ from, it’s an incel on reddit. Thanks tho
I'm not giving you advice. I'm explaining how life works. And laughing at your illiteracy.
You come from a broken home by any chance? Have you even met your father?
[–]hamster_rustler 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link
Since I guess you think I sleep with dudes, I’m actually a lesbian who doesn’t do “casual sex”.
I just observe incels as a hobby. It’s fun, but it can be a little depressing sometimes.
Anyways, have a good time living in the life you’ve created for yourself ✌️
[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link
Oh, so you don't practice what you preach? Why not? Real credible individual.
You didn't mention if you knew your father. That might explain a lot.
As someone who dates women you should know exactly what I'm talking about. I think you do and you're just trying to gaslight.
I love the life I created for myself I just wish Covid would get under control so I can travel again. I personally enjoy interacting with the dregs of society, its just amazing to watch all the degeneracy.
[–]hamster_rustler 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
Yo dude, the only thing I preach is that women are equal to, and should be judged equally as, men. Mutual respect.
Also that consensual sex is not wrong or destructive.
If you learned those concepts, maybe you wouldn't be an incel
[–]uwu_wu 49 points50 points51 points 5 years ago (26 children) | Copy Link
Today we’re shoes, wonder what we’ll be tomorrow.
[–]AnotherEdgyUsername 20 points21 points22 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Well I picked a piece of paper out of a hat and it says “skateboards”
[–]wildmeli 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Okay well I mean skateboards ARE pretty sick soooo
[–]josemartin2211 4 points5 points6 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Socks is the logical next step I think
[–]YoviQ 12 points13 points14 points 5 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
Someone in the comments compared us to condoms so...the possibilities are endless it seems.
[+]tendaga -7 points-6 points-5 points 5 years ago (15 children) | Copy Link
It would help if men could stoped being looked at as animals first no?
[–][deleted] 9 points10 points11 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Would help if both stopped being treated like shit at the same time.
[+]trapsaregaydontatme -10 points-9 points-8 points 5 years ago* (7 children) | Copy Link
Why do women have to stop so men have to stop? Fucking dumbass, stop being an immature misogynistic prick
[–]TheTreeOfLiberty 6 points7 points8 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Treat others the way you want to be treated.
[–]Graf_Orloff 10 points11 points12 points 5 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
Why do women have to stop so men have to stop?
Then why anyone has to stop anything?
[–]SystemFolder -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link
If you knew that your water had already passed through me, would you still want to drink it? What if it had passed through 50 people or 100? How many is too many?
[–]YoviQ 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
Again, women are human beings. All of these analogies y’all have comparing us to a bunch of objects is literal dehumanization.
[–]ShwayNorris 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
Human beings are objects. All physical existences are objects.
[–]SystemFolder 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
“If a dog has 50 previous owners, it’s more likely to have problems.”
Better?
[–]YoviQ 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
That’s...where does that assumption even come from?
[–]DrewblesG 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Holy shit unironically comparing a human being to a dog AND something that can be "owned." Enjoy remaining a friendless incel, because you're disgusting and stupid.
[–]ConmanConnors 174 points175 points176 points 5 years ago (20 children) | Copy Link
"50 previous owners"
Okay guys, you might want to pat yourself on the back and think "yeah I own this pussy now" but sex does not comvey ownership of another human's body parts. Jesus christ that is a messed up attitude shining through. I'm all for denying a pussy pass but this ain't it chief
[–]xinxinel14 points 5 years ago [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link
she's not yours, it's just your turn
Bowling alley shoes would of been a better comparison.
[–]valley_G 15 points16 points17 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Yeah that part though. Likeee it's still mine when you get done with it, Jerry. You don't own it or get to keep it just because I let you see it.
Commitment does. There's nothing wrong with being disgusted by people who don't value or understand the importance of commitment.
[–]Boomer84 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
There's so many things wrong with this it's unbelievable. It's quite sad to see it so upvoted.
Comparison to an inanimate object, implied ownership.
There's a lot that needs to stop
A male virgin isn't worth less A female virgin isn't worth more
Neither can be owned or owner.
It's all just depressing.
[+]SultanSaatana -7 points-6 points-5 points 5 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link
It's an analogy.
[–]TheDemonPants 12 points13 points14 points 5 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link
And it's a bad analogy that is wrong.
[–]SultanSaatana -3 points-2 points-1 points 5 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link
We all have different opinions.
[–]TheDemonPants 5 points6 points7 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Yeah, and equating people to objects is objectively wrong.
[–]grissomza -3 points-2 points-1 points 5 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link
Yeah, you think women are property
[–]SultanSaatana 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
If you say so, feminist.
[–]grissomza -3 points-2 points-1 points 5 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
Wait, is that bad?
[–]SultanSaatana 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Since feminism = misandry (hatred of men and boys) for the most part, yes.
[–]grissomza 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
False
[–]trapsaregaydontatme -4 points-3 points-2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
That is literally not what it means, just admit you don't want women to have equal rights and go back to your mother's basement
[–]MrPeppa 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Only to idiots who don't see women as people.
[–]grissomza -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Yeah, and people who don't see the harm to their own male bio sex caused by misogynistic social norms like custody.
Turns out, treat people like people is a good starting point that avoids any shoe fucking
[+]CrazyPascu -9 points-8 points-7 points 5 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link
Well I mean if he said that a shoe was fucked by 50 guys it would have had a different effect. I don't think he was saying that a woman with 50 ex partners was owned by any of them, it's just a metaphor.
Edit: just to be clear I'm not saying he is right.
[+]BloxerTheBlob -6 points-5 points-4 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Its a analogy, should they have said “If a shoe had 50 previous sexual partners”?
[–]ConmanConnors -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
It's a bad analogy. There's a point to be made about how comfortable someone is about sexual history but this is a weirdly possessive and dehumanising way of going about it. It would be the same if an employer made analogies about owning his workers or them being slaves or something. Bad analogies can make you look worse than what you're arguing against; to be honest I'd take a promiscuous woman over the "pussies are owned like shoes" guy
[–]rafa_azul3 47 points48 points49 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Lmao what is this incel shit and how is it pussy pass denied
[–]RedHood91939 115 points116 points117 points 5 years ago (33 children) | Copy Link
There's supposed to be a difference between denying the pussy pass and just being plain mysogynistic, why is this still even up?
[–]iheartmagic 47 points48 points49 points 5 years ago (18 children) | Copy Link
Incredibly stupid post.
r/badwomensanatomy material
Awww shit man i said the same thing before seeing this haha
[–]hahkaymahtay 37 points38 points39 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
This post is stupid.
[–]__2st__ 77 points78 points79 points 5 years ago (31 children) | Copy Link
something something master key. something something shitty lock.
[–]SultanSaatana 18 points19 points20 points 5 years ago (30 children) | Copy Link
If a key opens many locks it's a master key.
If a lock is opened by many keys it's a shitty lock.
[–]sirgregg 13 points14 points15 points 5 years ago (25 children) | Copy Link
That's a bit double standard isn't it?
[–]grissomza 13 points14 points15 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Yep. Maybe if she's into pegging then she's the master key
[–][deleted] 7 points8 points9 points 5 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
Women sell sex to men, not the other way around. That fact alone explains 80% of the relationship between men and women.
[–]sirgregg 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Is it women selling sex to men or men buying sex from women? Would they be able to sell if we weren't willing to pay?
Would a farmer be able to sell food if we weren't willing to buy?
[–]ILikeToArgueALot 7 points8 points9 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Something cannot be a double standard if you are not on equal footing to begin with.
Its easier for women to get sex than men. Hence why men are praised for getting laid and women arn't.
[–]bistix -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Only the type of people who post in this sub praise men for getting laid.
[–]ILikeToArgueALot 3 points4 points5 points 5 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link
Lmfao. Have you never seen....society? Why do you think rap stars always brag about the hot pussy theyre getting???
[–]pacmatt27 3 points4 points5 points 5 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link
It is but it's a double standard for a reason. The two things aren't the same. Personally I don't really mind how many people my partner has slept with (as long as it's not something ridiculous like in the hundreds). But yeah, the dynamic is very different. Women tend to be the gatekeepers of sex, it's very rare that women try to seduce a man and he's in the position of saying yes or no. It happens but not often. So if you've slept with lots of people as a woman, you've said yes a lot (which is fine). If you've slept with lots of people as a man, you've charming enough to get people to say yes a lot. One is more difficult than the other.
[–]A_Rampaging_Hobo 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
It's fair since guys tend to have to do most of the charming in the dating game.
I wouldn't ever take the phrase to heart though.
[–]sirgregg 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
guys tend to have to do most of the charming in the dating game
And the reason for that is posts like this one.
[–][deleted] -4 points-3 points-2 points 5 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
that's a nice way to see this
[–]valley_G 47 points48 points49 points 5 years ago (20 children) | Copy Link
Having sex with 50 people will not stretch anything. I don't understand why people think this since we literally give birth to whole humans and it goes right back to normal, sometimes tighter. Your dick will do literally nothing. Also, vaginas also aren't a pair of disposable footwear. It's a body part. If you don't like something someone else does with their own body then you don't have to be a part of it, but to sit here and talk shit like that is just stupid. I generally laugh along with the stuff posted here, but stupid shit like this is on a whole other level.
[–]Aeolsu 5 points6 points7 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Over 25 years I've regularly drop huge shits that stretch my asshole to it's limit, but it's always snapped right back to fighting form. So never made any sense to me why people thought you could wear out a vagina
[–]Timmy24000 15 points16 points17 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
I was looking for this comment. Guy do still believe that vaginas get stretched out!! It’s amazing with google at their fingertips.
I cannot fathom how someone would think having sex with 100 different people somehow loosens their vagina, but having sex with the same person 100 times will magically keep it tight. If a woman feels super tight every time you have sex is because she's possibly not enjoying it. Our bodies actually relax rather than tighten up when we enjoy someone's company. That's another fun fact for ya lol
[–]Donavato 8 points9 points10 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
I don’t think it’s about stretching. I think to some people an individual with numerous previous partners is gross. I’ve met both men and women who sympathize with that statement.
[–]valley_G 13 points14 points15 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
The guy who posted this absolutely is making a statement about "loose" women because he titled the post "Throwing a hotdog down a hallway."
[–]ILikeToArgueALot -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link
You obviously have never read mother forums.
Some women get vaginal scarring after birth and they say no matter how much lube they use now penetration feels like sandpaper.
Also about 100+ complications posted there women get. Like hormone changes that make them lose interest in sex etc
Some women even admit they feel looser after giving birth.
As women get older they get looser too.
Obviously many partners changes nothing. But to sit there and think vaginas cant ever change is pretty ignorant.
Guys dont ever have kids. Almost 50%+ of women seem to lose interest in sex after birth.
[–]valley_G 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link
You are 20000% not a woman. I am. Not only am I a woman, I've also been pregnant. Idk where your info comes from, but vaginas do not change as severely as you assume. You do not get loose after giving birth. You don't lose interest in sex, you're fucking exhausted because you just had at least one baby who needs constant care. There's also PPD, which is more severe than "regular" depression good most women and had a different set of symptoms. You need to spend less time on the internet and more time in the real world.
[–]Grateful_Breadd 7 points8 points9 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
I have heard women talk about their vaginas or labias changing a bit after birth. Now I have no idea if this is the majority or minority. But some women on r/badwomensanatomy have discussed that after birth their vaginas went back to how it was before birth, others said it was tighter and others said theirs were looser after birth. I think it just depends on the women. I also know women who have had different experiences with how their genitalia looked or felt months after giving birth. Just depends on the lady.
[–]ILikeToArgueALot 3 points4 points5 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Exactly. This woman is in full denial mode. Every case is different.
[–]Grateful_Breadd 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Like I’m not trying to argue with her, but it is different for every woman. Giving birth can be a very traumatic thing on the body. Some women bounce back with no problems others don’t or it takes longer to. Edit: Also thank you for the award. :)
[–]ILikeToArgueALot 3 points4 points5 points 5 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link
So youre saying the women that told me this are liars? Are you saying all women in mother forums are liars?
[–]valley_G 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
Have you actually met a woman or is this just an internet thing? Why are you randomly on forums for mother's if you're a guy? That doesn't even make sense.
[–]ILikeToArgueALot 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
Because its interesting reading the womens forums to learn this stuff so that I am educated.
You even said in your original comment you laugh at men making ignorant comments. But now you are annoyed that I try educate myself.
So men are annoying when they dont learn about womens biology and their annoying if they do as well? Lmao.
Be greatful you had no complications from your birth and had an easy delivery. Seems to impact a large percentage of other women.
[–]valley_G 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
That's not trying to educate yourself. That's just weird. You're pretending to know more about women than women because you invited yourself into some strange topic of conversation on a women's blog at some point where you somehow managed that vaginas turn into sandpaper and get loose after having children. You're not even remotely on the mark at all whatsoever. I really do not believe any of what you say at this point because it just doesn't make sense.
[–]ILikeToArgueALot 4 points5 points6 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Even if a mother gives birth. She only knows her birth experience. So if a mother like you never did any research the only education you have is anecdotal information. Meaning you have no experience in the thousand other types of births that can happen.
The fact you have never heard about any of these is pretty sad.
Its sad when men make wrong comments on womens biology, but its even sadder when a woman does it.
Its not weird. I mean you are literally doing the same thing. You are on a mens sub doing. The. Exact. Same. Thing.
https://www.bordermedicallaser.com.au/childbirth-vaginal-scarring-treatment#:~:text=Vaginal%20Scarring%20is%20an%20all,because%20of%20the%20sheer%20discomfort.
Please educate yourself.
[–]ILikeToArgueALot 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
"Vaginal scarring isnt real and makes no sense!!!!"
[–]CrossError404 -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
If you don't like something someone else does with their own body then you don't have to be a part of it
I generally agree. If someone's going to get a tatoo or dye their hair or whatever, I don't care. But there are things that I would care about. If my friend was doing self harm or started abusing drugs or anything that indicates he's depressed, thinking of suicide, then I should definitely care. If a woman had sex with 50 guys I would be concerned either for that woman (did she have bad luck, was she forced into prostitution, etc.) or the guys (was that woman so shitty that they all left her) or was she just having 50 casual one-nighters which I don't support but I ain't aggressive about.
[–]cheddoar 63 points64 points65 points 5 years ago (62 children) | Copy Link
So your shoes are sentient beings?
If a knife still cuts afer a million slices and is not wearing down at all
It's a very expensive knife...
Oh.. And humans aren't shoes nkr knifes
[–][deleted] 21 points22 points23 points 5 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link
Look, both these examples are flawed.
Not all your value is based on your sexual history, but certainly to some people it is a factor.
Much like amount of owners doesn't necessarily correlate to value either. Would a famous painting by a well regarded artist lose value because of the number of owners? Unlikely.
Really the whole argument is that one dick a hundred times is better than one hundred dicks once, even over the same timeframe. It's not about the sex, it's about the character.
At what point it matters, whether high or low is up to the individual and it is a consideration.
[–]suck_it_gaben 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
But those two things are often correlated in my opinion. Also usually the body count is the only value these people have because it's the only defining thing about them.
Humans wear down in a way.
[–]Grizzly4nicator 7 points8 points9 points 5 years ago (46 children) | Copy Link
If a knife still cuts after a million cuts then that's great, but it's still a used knife and would be valued as such.
Much like with high body count people. Sure they are still people and can fuck, but in the eyes of many their value is reduced. Some may feel that those with high body counts have issues with commitment, while others might think it's just disgusting getting plugged by countless dicks.
[+]Innitbruvinnit -8 points-7 points-6 points 5 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link
You're mistaking "the eyes of many" for the eyes of a fairly small part of society - incels, religious fanatics etc.
The view that a woman's body somehow declines in value after each sexual partner is definitely not a predominant view in society today bud.
[–]Weve_GotDodgsonHere 10 points11 points12 points 5 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link
Lol it's not her body that declines in value. Its her relationship desirability.
[–]Grizzly4nicator 3 points4 points5 points 5 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link
I'm neither an incel or religious fanatic, but I've always prefered to avoid high body count females as my personal preferences don't align with their own. I'm not one to run around like a wild animal shagging everything in sight. I'm more about the personal relationship vs the physical when I'm looking for a long term partner.
They can say "it's none of [your] business", but in reality it is entirely that person's business as it's up to them to decide if they want to have a relationship with the person. Past behaviours and actions DO influence people's decisions. To say otherwise is simply stupid.
For example. I don't want the mother of my children to have been in a 20 person bukkake or gang bang. That's fucking disgusting. I don't care if it was 10 years ago or last night.
[+]valley_G -7 points-6 points-5 points 5 years ago (27 children) | Copy Link
Yeah, nobody actually things like that anymore except Nice Guys™ and incels. It's nobody's business how many people someone else has been with. Literally no one. Like if you think my value is based on the number of people I've had sex with then I'm absolutely positive that your will not be one of those people because you've literally based my worth on something that has nothing to do with you or anyone else. It's like not wanting to be with someone because they've had previous boyfriends. You can't be mad about things that have nothing to do with you.
[–]Grizzly4nicator 3 points4 points5 points 5 years ago (26 children) | Copy Link
You can't be mad, but you can still make a decision on whether or not you want to be with that person. Nobody can force you to fuck a skank or manwhore unless you want to.
[–]cheddoar -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Maybe at this time people cannot commit but still need company.
Emotions are very complex
[–]Helghast92 21 points22 points23 points 5 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
This sub is full of incels and is dying
[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
factual
[–]OneEyedEyehole 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Affirmatory
[–]RatingsOutOfTen -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Why is "incel" the go-to assumption?
In just the 1990s and earlier, most women didn't want to be viewed as promiscuous. This whole "my past is not my present" attitude is relatively new.
[–]hamster_rustler 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Yeah, and before that (and still today actually) a woman could be killed for having sex outside of marriage.
Hm, it’s almost like it’s an incredibly sexist concept that lessens with every subsequent generation? Equality is crazy, isn’t it?
[–]SilvesbertStallone 41 points42 points43 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Neckbeards United approves this message
[–][deleted] 5 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link
[–]TheDemonPants 7 points8 points9 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Let's be honest, there have been a ton of incels here from the beginning. This kind of sub attracts their type.
[–]bocephus67 3 points4 points5 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Check the comment section, its not
[–]ourmet -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Nope, we down vote it.
[–][deleted] -3 points-2 points-1 points 5 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
Never heard of analogies?
[–]SilverReverie 3 points4 points5 points 5 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Considering they just explained why this is a false analogy, I'd guess that yes, they have.
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Analogies are never perfect.
[–]SilverReverie 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Correct. There is also a significant difference between an imperfect analogy and a false analogy.
She is saying what she wants to be true. She isn’t saying what is true.
[–]Insane_Chris 16 points17 points18 points 5 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Judging women based on their promiscuity or lack thereof is pathetic.
However, you can't have it both ways. If you decide to not attribute a lot of meaning to sexual encounters that is 100% your decision and absolutely nothing is wrong with that. But you can't just change your mind halfway through and then expect a partner to ignore your past. That's hypocritical af. This goes for both genders btw.
Just my 2 cents
[–]someevilwhitemen 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
why it is pathetic????
dont we say actions speaks louder than words, so judging someone by his actions rather than his words seems pretty reasonable to me
[–]Danamaganza 35 points36 points37 points 5 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link
Nothing wrong with experience.
[–]PrettyHeckinFashy 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
"Oh yeah hun, I learned this from a guy I hooked up with from the Netherlands, and perfected with a guy I met in Detroit, and then this I learned from a guy in Paris while I was touring the world. Oh, don't worry you're totally the one I want to stay with though."
[–]Danamaganza 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Pretty sure you’ve never been in a relationship.
[–]PrettyHeckinFashy 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Happily married :-)
[–]Danamaganza 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Just incredibly insecure maybe.
[–]PrettyHeckinFashy 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Bro all you gotta look at is the way some of these women act, I knew dozens of these people and they all end up living sad lives and marrying some weak software developer dude when they hit 30. It's not insecurity if you're making sure a woman is good or not.
[+]N00bsir301 -27 points-26 points-25 points 5 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
Except being experienced with having multiple stds at once
[–]cladinacape 21 points22 points23 points 5 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
But protection exists there's nothing to say she has anything
[+]N00bsir301 -19 points-18 points-17 points 5 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
You said there was nothing wrong with experience and I gave you a situation in which experience would not be very cash money. Had nothing to do with original post
[–]lixyna 7 points8 points9 points 5 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Experience does not equal STDs. What the fuck are you on about?
[–]Chr15t0 3 points4 points5 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
No sex = no STD. Checkmate
[–]lixyna 6 points7 points8 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Tons of sex with proper protection = no STDs
Your point?
[–]bocephus67 5 points6 points7 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I had many partners in many ports while in the Navy, zero STDs.
A good friend of mine lost her virginity and contracted HIV.
[–]dman71215 19 points20 points21 points 5 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
Comparing women to property is mighty incel-ish. This sub is being over run by incels..
[–]Ilikepizza_228 3 points4 points5 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Agreed. I’ve noticed it’s just getting worse.
Meh, you're taking things way too seriously.
[–]bocephus67 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Check the comments, I havent seen a comment supporting this post yet
[–]BlackendLight -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
With the amount of likes this post got you don't need to check the comments
[–]ILikeToArgueALot 5 points6 points7 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Wow the amount of people in here that don't understand what an analogy is is amazing
[–]someevilwhitemen 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
they do !!!! just when it fits their narrative
[–]MicrowavedBrownie 16 points17 points18 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
This guy did a great job objectifying women
[–]DrINF3RNO 12 points13 points14 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
It fucking does.
[–]ParallelTony7 points 5 years ago* [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link
I don't think the raw body count number is the issue. It's how easily you're open to getting fucked by strangers. Loose men looking for hook ups are into loose women looking for the same.
A man or a woman looking for a long-term relationship may steer away from people with high counts because they're not sure if they'll just be another statistic.
[–]RatingsOutOfTen 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
You said this very well. Upvote.
[–]qwertybuttz 3 points4 points5 points 5 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Your value being a partner can be based on your past sexual history though because its a subjective topic. As a woman, I wouldn't want to be with a man who has slept around with many other women before me. Who knows if the dude has STDs, baby mama drama, or other issues that causes him the inability to form proper relationships. Same thing goes for women. There's a low chance of unfaithfulness and mental/physical health issues being with someone who hasn't had many sexual partners. In conclusion, that can make a less experienced person more valuable in the dating pool.
[–]someevilwhitemen 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
you clearly suffer from unchecked internal misogyny , you should reeducate yourself
[–]MoistGrannySixtyNine 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Not being a thot is misogynistic now?
[–]Noshamina 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Yeah but a chef doesnt lose his value the more meals he cooks...
[–]Snoo33176 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Wow, this post really brought out the toxic feminists.
[–]WamJammy 8 points9 points10 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I love just checking the comments every couple of months and just seeing how much more of a shithole this sub becomes.
I would not be surprised if it gets a ban.
[–]bocephus67 9 points10 points11 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
The comments here have made me proud to be in this sub, well done my dudes
[–]Waffle626 5 points6 points7 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Title of the post is cringe, OP is an incel for sure.
[–]nqsoa 8 points9 points10 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Fun fact women aren't shoes
[–]cagedb1rd 9 points10 points11 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
This is pussypassdenied as in the woman can’t use her pussy as a pass..... NOT for posts by dudes who have NEVER PASSED THRU A PUSSY. Go jack off in the corner again bro
[–]Hippo_Operator 11 points12 points13 points 5 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link
I'm dating a girl at the moment who has a high body count.
Idgaf, I'm a hoe too.
[–]UAintMyFriendPalooka 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Same. We’re both quite experienced and the sex is awesome because of it.
[–]Hippo_Operator -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Yes! And we do all wild shit and it's awesome fun.
I don't understand why some dudes/femdudes have to be prudes. Gurl, you wanna suck 50 dicks in college, be my guest. When I meet you, you'll be a dick sucking expert and I'll love you all the same.
[–]MoistGrannySixtyNine 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Epic reddit moment
[–][deleted] 22 points23 points24 points 5 years ago (55 children) | Copy Link
That's pretty stupid tbh. There's nothing in the woman's body that "loses quality" the more sex she has, so in term of economics it makes no sense.
[–]DrINF3RNO 3 points4 points5 points 5 years ago (16 children) | Copy Link
Ok so being in a state of mind where you enable yourself to have a meaningless relationship with multiple men and not seeking a stable relationship isn't considered as devaluing ones self? Being that kind of person says a lot about them and it has little to do with how you use your body since once in a relationship you keep having sex on a regular basis as any healthy couple does.
Yes her value is much lower due to the fact of how many different dicks she took DUH.
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
So....having casual relationships or hooking up automatically means you're a bad person? Since I'm a guy with a high body count does that mean my value is gone?
That's fucked up thinking. I really hope you were just being sarcastic
[–]Neldot 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Of course it has nothing to do with being a bad person but it's a red flag for people searching a long term relationship.
In fact people searching for a committed relationship would search for other people exiting from long term relationships. They won't see someone that has had a lot of previous sexual partners as a fit candidate.
Too many partners means also that the person would develope too high standards and less capacity to bond, so the latest partner will be always subject to confrontation (especially in the sexual field) with all the previous ones.
[–]Boomer84 -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link
Why is sex something that's unique in the human experience?
If I have multiple friends I am not devaluing myself
If I scuba dive in multiple locations I am not devaluing myself
And If I drive multiple different cars I am not devaluing myself.
So why is sex suddenly the thing that devalues me? And why only if I am a woman?
[–]someevilwhitemen 3 points4 points5 points 5 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
for god sake, how long people are going to deny sex matters !
sex is not like drinking or pooping or playing tennis , it doesnt affect you the same way
how many people suffer from playing traumas in their life , how many link to sex ??
how do you traumatize a young kid with sex or playing tennis ??
[–]DrINF3RNO 3 points4 points5 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Cause I can't get pregnant while scuba or driving. Stupid ass analogy. Try thinking a bit more before replying
[–]Boomer84 -4 points-3 points-2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Lol, you're a Muppet.
The image is comparing women to a shoe.
There are plenty of forms of protection that stop you getting pregnant. Stop being obtuse.
[–]Torquemada1970 -2 points-1 points0 points 5 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
This kind of attitude doesn't last long after one has left school.
[–]DrINF3RNO 3 points4 points5 points 5 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Get better education.
[–]Amilo159 3 points4 points5 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
That's actually not true. Body gets used to anything over time. First time is always special while 500th isn't that much so.
Just be forthcoming about your history. If it's a problem for your partner it's better he know about it right away, rather than finding out later.
Humans form strong bonds with people they have sex with, after multiple partners that bond weakens until it is little to nothing. The same thing with any vice, it's great the first time, okay the second, and meh the third, until doing it just once is not enough. Similar to drugs, this is why hookup culture is a plague to humanity.
So literally, yes, a person's ability to form lasting bonds with another does lose quality with the amount of partners they have.
It's not that you form a strong bond with any person you sleep with, it's rather that if you have a strong bond with a person having sex with him strengthen it. You need emotional connection so the sex will be something more than just satisfying primal urge. And you definitely need to have sex occasionally to release stress, function as a human being and not turn into a celibate. What if you don't have a constant partner? You sleep around and there's nothing wrong with that.
Think about people who [probably] have a lot of sex: rock stars in the 70s, models, actors and even porn actors (not the best representatives of the human kind but arguably have the most sex) - most (or at least some) of them have normal relationships despite their promiscuous lifestyle, not because their romantic partners turn a blind eye to their numerous previous sex partners, but because sometimes sex is just that - a vice that you want or need to occasionally do.
Of course while being in a relationship ideally there should be only one sex partner (or several, in accordance to your beliefs) providing both physical and emotional joy of sex.
[–]AvenDonn 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Not in the body.
The brain though...
[–]koki1235 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
The likelihood of incurable STDs increases as the bodycount increases.
[–]DredThis 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I honestly don’t think it’s a an issue of physical quality being lost. I don’t have a concern about someone else’s number of partners, it’s none of my business. If I was looking for someone long term I would take it into consideration though. I know it’s not a certainty but it is leading evidence in someone’s personal trait related to potential for cheating or becoming bored with a sexual partner. New is fun, agreed. New all of the time makes me wonder if a person can’t find interest after the first couple of “encounters.” So in terms of finding a life long mate maybe I would over look this history if I could tell it wasn’t a likely problem but I would think on it quite a bit and maybe some people it would be a deal breaker.
[–]OddJackfruit6 7 points8 points9 points 5 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
That’s some incel shit right there. Seek help.
[–][deleted] 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]OddJackfruit6 10 points11 points12 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
It was more for me than you.
[–]HowAreTheseSocks 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
That's what She said.
[–]datastelessgentleman 3 points4 points5 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Show me the whore-fax
[–]Turtle08atwork 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
lmaooooo that was fucking rude as hell but I laughed, so cheers.
[–]rissaroni_19 10 points11 points12 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Lets not compare women to inanimate objects.
[–]Jbell_Lucas 3 points4 points5 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Isn’t there a second comment to this? Something about supply and demand?
[–]DredThis 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
A lot of good comments on both points of view. However it seems like most are talking strictly about a female. I think despite the op the issue relates to all people not just straight females. Would we all have the same opinion if it was universal or do we make a sliding scale of judgment based on what gender we are discussing?
[–]NineFingeredZach 7 points8 points9 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
This is more of a r/neckbeards post.
[–][deleted] 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Ragabadoodaa 9 points10 points11 points 5 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link
If you had a few bad relationships then I'm fine taking you. If you got picked up at bars by douchebags just for some "adventure" then fuck off. Past failed relationships might not have been your fault, fucking around is both your fault.
[–]someevilwhitemen 3 points4 points5 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
funny ! people who dont want to be judge by their actions are trash , so i guess i know what type you are
ragabadoodaa is right
[–]Ragabadoodaa 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Hurt that I wasn't a douchebag? How low does your self esteem have to be to have that kind of feeling?
[–]NineFingeredZach 7 points8 points9 points 5 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
I’m just going to assume you’re single
[–]Ragabadoodaa 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
You assume right. Do you assume there's any shame in it also?
[–]GabKoost 3 points4 points5 points 5 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Giving off sex as a common currency that holds no moral value does decrease your value for someone looking for a long term partner.
Sex is the most personal thing one can give to the other.
Women are the biological selector. Not men. If a woman gives off sex to everyone who crosses her path it means she is unable to select.
In other words, if she has a double digits body count before she turns 20, she will 99% of the time cheat on her partner sooner or later.
That's reality. Men who fuck around when young are much more prone to be faithful when married than a woman who has fucked around when young.
[–]johnchapel6 points 5 years ago* [recovered] (2 children) | Copy Link
You're spot on with everything except maybe that last point. Slight correction if I may?
Men who fuck around when young are much more prone to be faithful when married than a woman who has fucked around when young. continue fucking around into older age
Promiscuity is hard behavior to shake.
[–]thiscrayy 6 points7 points8 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Yeah, because comparing a human being to a pair of shoes is not totally incel level bs thinking... but bAsIc EcOnOmIcS.
[–][deleted] 6 points7 points8 points 5 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link
If body count doesn't matter + male opinion on women doesn't matter, then why do women Constantly lie about their body count?
Cus you know it matters to any partner you want to settle with. If it didn't you'd be honest from the get go but women are deceptive when it comes to notch count because they know it affects their worth. Stop lying to yourself majority of self respecting men will not want to settle for a experienced women. Don't mind smashing them but settling? Out of the question.
This is the reason why more and more women are struggling to find men to settle with. Delusional unfortunately.
Will get downvoted to oblivion but if body count didn't matter women wouldn't be so deceptive about their body count & lie or lie by omission.
[–]RatingsOutOfTen 4 points5 points6 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I upvoted you because you are right.
The women with high body counts and the men who want to be one of those body counts, or men who simply don't know yet that women are capable of being bad also are the ones that downvote you.
The world is living in a Disney dreamworld/nightmare. People want to act like "the world is changing and soon things will be a perfect, no consequences sex utopia" but those people fail to realize that this false reality is being subsidized by men who buy women gifts, buy women drinks at bars, and marry women who lie about their body counts. They expect the fantasy to go on forever.
Men are waking up and not marrying, buying gifts, or dating emotionally damaged women with 200k in student debt. It doesn't matter what she looks like. Many older women are beautiful and probably great in bed. Guess what? Doesn't matter.
I no longer value a relationship, because for 30 years, I have been fit, tall, and relatively handsome. The more I give to women, the more I have been taken advantage of. I'm no longer interested.
And all people like u/TheDemonPants can say in response to your length, thought out and worthwhile explanation is :
You should get downvoted to oblivion because you're an idiot. Why is it okay for men to have a lot of sexual partners, but not women?
The answer is the same as it always has been. Women will be with a promiscuous man. Some men will be with a promiscuous woman as well. Many people care, though, and it's the man asking the woman out who determines the woman's value. If the woman doesn't have what the man wants, he doesn't ask. But that's okay u/TheDemonPants, because then there are more for you.
[+]TheDemonPants -9 points-8 points-7 points 5 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link
[–]PrettyHeckinFashy 4 points5 points6 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
It's not okay for men, or wahmen, to have high body counts.
That's always the response whenever a man doesnt want to be with a women with a high body count. " but men do it muhhhh". The answer is within my previous comment.
1) women are happy to be with promiscuous men if that wasn't the case then high body count men would be just as frowned upon as female equivalent. Women tend to be into men other women want.
Majority of men don't want to be with promiscuous women. Paternal reason and many other for that.
2) higher the body count the more likely she is to initiate divorce. So why commit.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-4085758/Experts-reveal-sexual-partners-ve-determine-likely-DIVORCE.html
3) ask yourself that. If women really were comfortable with their notch count, they wouldn't downplay to trick a man into committing to you.
If body count doesn't matter y'all should discuss it on the first date if there's a problem then you move on.
I presume you have a high body count 50+ and now are terrified what your current or future partner would think if they found out.
Like i said women say:
Mens opinion on women and their bodies is none of their business. + Body count doesn't matter
So why do y'all care about our distaste for promiscuous women? Cus your projecting about any potential future relationships when you read about men not wanting to be promiscuous women. Your relationship is going to shit unless you lie/ like through omisison ...
[–]ddelGuy 4 points5 points6 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
I usually do not trust PEOPLE ( women in my case since I am a man) with a high body count simply because they should figure out what they want after some relationship experiences (whatever that means) but if they keep fucking people and not find out they are not worth counting on for a relationship and/or they are probably just stupid and/or hoes ( both female and male ).
[–]RatingsOutOfTen 8 points9 points10 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I'm with you. I don't want to deal with an unstable woman who has a lot of casual sex.
[–]BreakTheIce216 4 points5 points6 points 5 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
Yikes... to me, it’s the same as big or small dick, height etc... you don’t fucking shame the person for it. However, you can choose a preference. If you want to stop the relation respectfully it’s fine. I could be biased because of my former conservative background though.
[–]RatingsOutOfTen 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
I tend to agree. It's all a matter of preference.
[–]ofekt92 6 points7 points8 points 5 years ago (16 children) | Copy Link
This again? OP are you 12 or still a virgin?
This kind of thinking is so boomer logic. There is nothong wrong with a woman (or a man) enjoying sex. It's a natural thing.
In fact, one could argue it's the only biological reason we're on this planet.
Grow up, and stop thinking about how other people are enjoying their sex lives
[–]RatingsOutOfTen 4 points5 points6 points 5 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link
Enjoying sex isn't the same as having a sexual history that puts certain men off.
I don't really get it. Slut-shaming is pretty much the same as uttering the n-word these days. It's nowhere NEAR as common as when I was a teenager, and the men, or women who try to shame these women are often ignored anyway.
I don't even hate or want to keep these women down. I just would never want to have a serious relationship with them. The obvious response is "OH SO YOU JUST CAN'T GET LAID!!!" but in reality, I've been married to a woman that I had sex with early on in the relationship. I didn't come out on to after going to family court. I've gotten older and I realize that many of the women that I go on dates with would be just as prone to divorcing me again, and I know that most relationships fail, and I also don't want just sex. I want a genuine connection and that 1950s style relationship with cotton candy and going to the fair, or walking at the park and holding hands. I just would rather be alone than try to pursue a relationship like that with a woman who has had too many partners, because I don't think she'll be loyal, and I don't think she'll respect me.
So is it guys like myself that bother you, or is it men who run around trying to change women's behavior by calling them 'sluts' or 'thots' or whatever? I'm genuinely trying to understand because from my perspective it just looks like certain men are playing the game differently, but I would like to know if I am doing something wrong. I'll admit that I use the word "slut" on occassion when talking to male friends, but I don't want to call women sluts, nor do I want to keep women with a colorful sexual history from being themselves.
Thoughts?
[–]someevilwhitemen 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
and you you get triggered , you feel targeted ?? thats why you have a problem with this
[–]succeedaphile 7 points8 points9 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Shame on the person who posted this INCEL shit.
[–]stalkakuma 5 points6 points7 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Oh no, this is neck beard worthy post. No OP, bad. We do not slut shame anymore.
[–][deleted] 6 points7 points8 points 5 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link
People can do what they want. Doesn't mean it's "right" or whatever's PC for the next 30 minutes. It's all about preference. Maybe, in this scenario, the kink is slut shaming, or being shamed for being a slut. There are people out there who get off to being treated like garbage and/or treating people like garbage. Just because someone calls someone else a slut or a thot doesn't mean it wasn't consensual.
I once knew a couple in, what I thought, was a pretty strange relationship. She was ok with him hooking up with other men, and at the end of the day part of their thing was her getting up his ass and berating him about it in some pretty weird ways. We are allowed to publicly disagree with the decisions of others if they so choose to make them public.
It's pretty obvious what this post is, but at the same time it could be part of some grand scheme that we aren't privy to.
e: god yes please fucking downvote me for saying something so controversial 🤣
e2: cowards dare not face the truth 🥵
[–]Philosophipster 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I always tell women, now that im 35+, rich and fit, that my value shouldnt depend on my sexual future. Just extrapolating their logic. Works flawlessly when you’re in the lead with SMV.
[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points 5 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
PPD is meant for seeing women do actually messed up things, not for people to share their opinions on what they think a woman’s value should be held by.
[–]theanxiousbandit 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
This post doesn't belong here lol. This is just slut shaming.
[–]RatingsOutOfTen -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Not really.
I mean, it completely is
So comparing women to objects and the men who have sex with them 'own' them. Okay, buddy.
[–]Azurlos-1871 3 points4 points5 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
So you are admitting that you see women as nothing more than objects with a market value?
Women are definitely an investment of time and attention and even money. I mean... don't they have to offer something that a man wants in order to get a man?
I mean... just imagine a woman who wasn't really a woman, but just a sex doll. I'd be like "eh... I guess it's not too expensive compared to dating, but having this will cost me the attention of other women. I'll have to inflate it regularly. It won't clean itself. It's not really going to give me much besides sex. It can't cook or clean. It won't even pretend to provide any income, because the tech isn't there yet... it can't make me babies..." So the sex doll is kind of waste of my money. Some men disagree.
But the same questions can be asked about an actual woman as well. Is she nice? Does she try to control the conversation with her anger or by crying? Does she guilt trip? Is she clean? Has she cheated in the past? Does she seem addicted to sex? Do other men make her giddy? Will she cook and clean? If not, does she make money that she doesn't immediately spend? Is she secretive about her past?
Those are all valid questions to a man who is about to pay for a date and take a woman out. Men ask those questions and try to game the situation out to see if it's worth continuing communication with a woman.
Women definitely ask similar questions.
[–]DucklingsF_cklings 4 points5 points6 points 5 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Pretty shallow to place all the value of another human being on how many sexual partners they’ve had. I’m not shoes, or a lock. I’m a human being, and my personality should also be worth something to the person I’m dating. Not only my sexual history
you judge people according to their behavior !!!! so it is fair
women do the same and suddenly no problem for you
[–]StpPstngMmsOnMyPrnAp 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Every time I see this post re- or crossposted it brings new controversy with it
[–]Avocado_OverDose 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Wants to settle down for beta bucks after she looks like an Arby's Melt
[–]Blunt_Sage 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I know plenty of women who think the same about men who have had a high number of partners. Most people think it's gross if you've had more than what they're comfortable with.
[–]1nf1n1t3_Sag3 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Yup. So used that Goodwill won’t even take them.
[–]hnug2 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Slut is meant to be used.
[–]gmikoner 3 points4 points5 points 5 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
personal value, sure... sexual value on the other hand. hate to break it to ya ladies...
If you buy a sandwich, would you want to eat it if it has had 30 mens dicks inside it?
[–]KayJeeAy 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link
Well her value as a human being wont change. But her sexual value will. Sure her relationship value is very shaky and on the brink to plummeting since you dont really know if yout could trust her or if she will break up in like a month or so.
[–]RatingsOutOfTen 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Is a man's value based on his sexual history?
[–]Nuttin_Up 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
True. But it could indicate mental health/personality disorder issues that I don’t want to deal with. Been there, done that.
[–]missyeve99 -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
The more meals a chef makes the better they become at making food. Sex is a skill and practice makes perfect.
[–]RatingsOutOfTen 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
The more time a chef is perfecting his cooking skills, the more valuable he/she becomes in the kitchen. The less he/she spends time training other skills.
Thats fine for a chef who wants to make a living off of cooking, but I don't want to be with a woman who perfects her "craft" of sexuality.
I’m a woman, and I regularly enjoy these posts on this sub. But this... is just stupid
[–][deleted] -5 points-4 points-3 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Stop giving upvotes to this shit post !
[–]PrettyHeckinFashy 6 points7 points8 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
No.
[–]abilgec 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
A high body count doesn’t mean someone objectively has lower value. But people want what they want & if someone doesn’t want to be with you bc of your past high body count, that’s also not unfair. I wouldn’t make judgements either way. As long as everyone knows what they’re getting into & content with it, this idea of value is irrelevant.
[–]Old-Man-of-the-Sea 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
implies:
Proves OP, other dude and the mods:
This post is shit. If the mods can't see that and remove it, then the mods are misogynistic fucktards. That right mods, I'm talking to you. This does not represent the purpose of this sub as stated. This woman is not using her 'gender as a handicap or an excuse to be an asshole'. If you can't hold this sub to be true to its purpose, you should quit being a mod. DO YOUR FUCKING JOB MODS.
men are trash is a metaphor but you take this analogy at first degree
maybe there is something wrong with you too ?? who knows
[–][deleted] 5 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link
[+]THIESN123 -10 points-9 points-8 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]queernhighonblugrass 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link
Someone's jaded
[–]JesterIzDead 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
A bunch of guys who can’t get laid trying to shame women lol
[–]RatingsOutOfTen 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Why is that the go-to?
Why is it so hard to believe that a man doesn't want to risk getting an STD, a false allegation, child support payments and the other complications that occur from having sex with promiscuous women?
This is a stupid post.
[–]goinupthegranby 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
'Women are the same as pairs of shoes' isn't 'basic economics', it's a combination of 'bad womens anatomy' and 'sexist idiocy'.
I'm all for this sub calling out asshole women being denied, that's great, but there's clearly a large following of sexist fucksticks in here too.
[–]trapsaregaydontatme -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
What? How?
[–]twiggy572 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (16 children) | Copy Link
Same for men then.
Edit: Why is there so many slut shaming/sex shaming posts in this sub lately? Clearly, the men posting it are 50 year old virgins or something. Just because a girl can get it doesn’t mean you should be jealous
[–]someevilwhitemen 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
just cause a man dont like promiscuity women , he is just and old 50 virgin
funny how most people on earth think the exact same way, i guess most people on earth are just 50 old virgins
you can shame a man for being virgin , but a man cant shame a woman for being a slut
[–]RatingsOutOfTen 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link
30 year old who divorced his physically abusive spouse and lost half of his wealth.
I'm the kind of guy who upvotes this. I think it was worth a chuckle.
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link
Go to therapy before you become Stephen Molyneux.
[–]RatingsOutOfTen 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
That. Isn't. An. Argument.
lol
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
Correct, it's advice.
[–]RatingsOutOfTen 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
It doesn't make sense either. Molyneux was only married once and never claimed to be physically abused by a spouse.
[–]clientfker -3 points-2 points-1 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Yeah fuck this sub.
[–]grissomza 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
So what, literally analogous to property? Gtfo
[+][deleted] -14 points-13 points-12 points 5 years ago (18 children) | Copy Link
Saying shit like "haha shut up incel" or neckbeard or whatever is just a clear sign that you people are utterly brain washed by feminists telling you that it is okay for a women to sleep around with as many men as she wants. women's greatest agency is her sexuality and if she is walking around passing it from one dude to the other then that only means that that agency is valueless.
The same goes for men. A man's greatest agency is his emotional and financial attention. And if he walks around giving it to any women who slightly flirts with him he also is deemed worthless and valueless (think of the simps of onlyfans and twitch).
[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Bro you're wasting your time, I'm glad that reddit isnt real life. The most deluded people on the planet lol and they encourage each others delusion
[–]KaxyOP 6 points7 points8 points 5 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link
Okey I usually go against pretty much everything modern feminism do, but that's just plain sexism, women have much more to offer other than sex
[+][deleted] -10 points-9 points-8 points 5 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link
okay lets have a civil discussion then.
If you are a man who had a strong fatherly figure who disciplined him, and a feminine loving mother who loved him, AND you are financially stable. What do you think a woman can offer you ?
Im open for discussion
[–]begon11 8 points9 points10 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
What kind of viewpoint is that you are looking for an offer?
What we can look for in a partner, is same as with friendship, a person we trust, which we confide into and who we just enjoy being around.
When looking at a wife or husband, an additional part would be sexual compatibility. Now take a guess who will be more open sexually and more ready to try out things with you?
[–]TheDemonPants 3 points4 points5 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
There isn't a discussion though, you're outright saying that the only thing important in a woman is her vagina. You know that "loving mother" you has thoughts, opinions, and her own personality, right? Hell, you're own mother could have been a huge slut and you'd never know. Maybe look at who the person is now instead of who they were.
[+]hnug2 -7 points-6 points-5 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Not a slut, that's the compulsory for me.
What else she can offer? I already have everything.
[–]Innitbruvinnit 4 points5 points6 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
This is last century thinking my friend, society has progressed away from these "agencies" you talk about. A hundred years ago I would have maybe agreed with you to some extent. Society's values have changed, I guess you could accept it or, yeah, just call everyone brainwashed.
[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
This is not oriental thinking at all. It is patriarchal thinking which explains why you associate it with oriental societies because they are still patriarchal.
Western societies used to be the exact same in the 18th and 19th and beginning of the 20th century.
But feminism drove patriarchy out of the west and somehow managed to convince young women that having sex with a large amount of men is "experiencing life and humanity".
How about marrying someone early and having kids with one man? Isn't that life experience?
[–]C20H25N3O-C21H30O2 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Thank you. I'd give you a wholesome award if I could. I'll get downvoted with you, but I agree with you so I'll take it. This woke PC culture is really nonsense. It's funny when I read articles about female empowerment, chasing career, /r/FemaleDatingStrategy lifestyle, then other articles about single women in their 40's, freezing their eggs, hoping for a white knight. That's when they meet the consequences of their actions.
You don't know my story....
[–]_stonedprobably_ 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Value is determined by supply & demand..
Tinder. Onlyfans. TikTok.
There is a lot of supply of women's bodies out there, and there are a lot of women like this one.
[–]trapsaregaydontatme -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link
Holy shit that, "throwing a hotdog down a hallway" is one of the dumbest things I have ever heard.
It's not about the vagina getting permanently stretched out. It's about her heart getting permanently stretched out.
[–]DropKikMonkey 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
A key that opens any door is called a master key but what can be said about a door that opens with any key?
A sharpener that can sharpen many pencils is a good sharpener but a pencil that’s been sharpened many times it small and blunt.
[–]SkeweredWasabi -4 points-3 points-2 points 5 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link
Value can be affected by sexual history but isn’t solely reliant on it. So, it’s wrong to say that one’s value is based on his/her sexual history(sexual history affects 100% of your value). Instead, its fine to say that someone’s value is affected by their sexual history. Whether we feel sexual history affects someone’s value is up to the individual since value is also arbitrary. Similar to individual preferences. Also, econimics functions on demand factors. Basic economics has nothing to do with this lol. Heres an example. You meet a girl with an insane body count but posseses a great personality and is particularly attractive. You then contemplate getting together with her but then remember that her body count also has much to say about her and who she is(her way of handling things, her perspective, her personality etc...). All im saying is that sexual history doesn’t always define a person. It CAN but it doesn’t always have to which is why jumping to conclusions is foolish.
[–]walkth3earth -3 points-2 points-1 points 5 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
i actually don’t understand why people care so much about sexual history. like who tf really cares? isn’t the whole point of dating an experiment to see who you are comparable with both emotionally and physically? this just sounds like some 50 year old wrote this
[–]RatingsOutOfTen 4 points5 points6 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Men who have reputations of being players are seen as being likely to continue to being players.
Women who have reputations of having a lot of casual sex are seen as being likely to continue to have casual sex.
Some men want a woman who has something else to offer, and some men are concerned that a woman who has had a lot of casual sex will have trouble saying "no" when she is asked by other men.
[–]walkth3earth 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
lmao that is hilarious. tf you mean men are concerned that if a girl who have casual sex will have trouble saying no when asked by other men. do you think women who have casual sex just throw their pussy at any men who asks?
[–]icyhotonmynuts 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
Dunno man, sexuality is very subjective. One man's hotdog hallway snide joke is another man's fisting / brutal dildo paradise.
A very good point. Not all men want a hallway for their hotdog. Some want a paradise for their fist.
[–]Serzern 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
This feels like straight up woman hate are we not above this.
[–]istarxh 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
the fact it got 3.2k and a bunch of rewards before it got removed is sad, downvotes should do the work before mods have to.
[–]Outcast_LG 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Yeah MGTOW2, mensrights, and pussypassdenined have all been degenerating into just the same ole. "woman bad" "don't have women in your lives" "women are this" "wow I can't believe this woman said this about men" versus their content being about any "egalitarian" cause
[–]serb2212 -3 points-2 points-1 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
This is just stupid.
If one is not blatantly promiscuous than his/her body count is whatever they say it is. That is not even up for discussion. People would be better off being up front about it, or sticking with the lie, and be done with wanting reassurance on this one.
[–]NowFreeToMaim 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
And even farther down if 50 dude came in it
[–]Levoxymoron 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I never understood people telling other people what they can or can't be attracted to. If I don't want a partner to have a lot of previous partners, that's my business
[–]CuntMonteCristo -3 points-2 points-1 points 5 years ago (19 children) | Copy Link
A brutal fact of life is that vaginas wear down with use, just look at the vaginas of 18 year old pornstars and vaginas of pornstars after 600 films. Especially after giving birth it is never the same again, as all honest married men will tell you, when their wives are not around. Don't hate the messenger, these are just facts of life...when you align yourself with reality, you live a better life!
I'm skeptical to be honest. I've had older women before and they felt okay, but I guess it depends.
Honestly... I don't care all that much about sex. I care about cheating and stability.
Someone who has a lot of casual sex often isn't stable and will be prone to cheating.
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (16 children) | Copy Link
That isn’t true at all. The walls are elastic, does your asshole stay the same shape after you’ve taken a shit?
[–]West-Painter 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
nO ITS NoT TrUe aLl BaginAS mATTer
[–]SultanSaatana -5 points-4 points-3 points 5 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link
Same for a car. If a used car has had 50 owners I would be like hell no.
[–]trapsaregaydontatme 5 points6 points7 points 5 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
She is not an inanimate object
[–]SultanSaatana -3 points-2 points-1 points 5 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
Look up the word analogy.
[–]UppermostKhan -5 points-4 points-3 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
This is super disrespectful and not even funny.
[–]RatingsOutOfTen 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Humor is subjective.
Types of humor are about supply and demand. Just like the sexual market.
[–]MadnessReloaded 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Wrong sub
[–]NoTalkNoJutsu -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Mods should remove this dumbass post that has nothing to do with this sub
[–][deleted] -3 points-2 points-1 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
People aren't shoes
[–]RatingsOutOfTen 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
I am loafer.
Oh my mistake then, carry on
[–]JustThatGuyBen -2 points-1 points0 points 5 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
This is the wrong vibe for this sub
[–]RatingsOutOfTen 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
He just denied her. I don't get it.
[+]AvenDonn -16 points-15 points-14 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Then why are you such a worthless person, whose sole redeeming quality is having a moist hole and a body temperature higher than your IQ?
[+][deleted] -16 points-15 points-14 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
A condom is worthless after its had only one dick in it.
[–]Izzyb231 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Bahaha!! :'D
[–]Moxdonalds -4 points-3 points-2 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
I mean, I’d rather be with someone who knows what they’re doing. Would you rather have surgery from a first year med student or a doctor who’s done that procedure hundreds of times.
[–]C20H25N3O-C21H30O2 -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
You are thinking of escorts.
[–]AhmedBVB -3 points-2 points-1 points 5 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Human living aren't a capitalist products.
Everything in nature has to do with supply and demand.
That includes the supply and demand of sex. If a lot of women are on pornhub, onlyfans, and wherever else, fewer men are going to be willing to pay for it.
If many women are having casual sex, a man is less willing to take a woman on a date to get it, because he can get it elsewhere.
[–]Turtle08atwork -4 points-3 points-2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Incel trash. Do not post that shit here again OP.
[–]thearticulategrunt -5 points-4 points-3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
This depends. In some cultures if she has gotten really good her value would have have gone way up.
[+]gothpunkboy89 -6 points-5 points-4 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
This is some incel logic here op.
[–]MaesterPraetor -5 points-4 points-3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Uh-oh. This person doesn't know much about much lol
[–][deleted] -3 points-2 points-1 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Idk ab this one chief
[+]outofnames11 -6 points-5 points-4 points 5 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
This post is nothing but bad womens anatomy material made for Incels
[–]RatingsOutOfTen 4 points5 points6 points 5 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
I can't speak for all men, and I don't expect a virgin or anything, but I would rather be single than be with a woman who has had too many sexual partners in the past.
[–]nanatavares -3 points-2 points-1 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
i usually agree with the posts in this sub but this one is plain incel bullshit. women are not objects and you can't compare them to shoes. fuck you op
[–]BadJokeCentral5 -2 points-1 points0 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I get that some people don’t want a high body count, but the people who use “basic economics” to describe a human body are absolute cringe lords.
This post is not clever, it’s pretty cringe.
[+]gchaudh2 -6 points-5 points-4 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
What kind of incel shit is this
[+]YummyGummyDrops -7 points-6 points-5 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
This has nothing to do with the sub. Just a stupid sexist comment
[–]Phalexan -2 points-1 points0 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
I’ll never meet her so why do I care
[–]canada_is_best_ -3 points-2 points-1 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
This is not true - the other way.
If shes had one or three partners, one or two times each, she knows nothing of decent sex.
If she had 1 or three partners for months or years, she likely knows some stuff.
She a milf with 2 kids and two ex husbands? She going to be freaky, and likely can ride well.
She had 40+ partners in the past few years? Something is wrong.
It's supply and demand.
Demand is subjective and depends on the man who is looking at the supply. Some men don't want a woman who doesn't know everything about sex.
[–]brettbri5694 -3 points-2 points-1 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Wow incel/braincell refugee posting is allowed here, I’m shocked =_=
This sub is garbage
[–]AmdM78 -4 points-3 points-2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
We have a saying in Portugal: "After washed, it's new! ".
[–]Outcast_LG -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Ugh I’m not about this post? What’s wrong with someone valuing themselves more than how many people they slept with?
[–]chodan9 -3 points-2 points-1 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
If a pair of shoes can survive 50 owners then those are magic shoes and I want them
[–]Sultan6 -4 points-3 points-2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Incel.
[–]GarnetDivine -2 points-1 points0 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Oh look r/incel is leaking
[–]IndigoSunsets_ -2 points-1 points0 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
It’s simply none of my business. If I love your company and trust you enough to get intimate, then I could care less. My insecurities should not worsen due to your sexual history because I’m your sexual present.
But if you are a cheater or have a sexually transmitted disease then thats my line, because that can affect me in the present day.
[–]TheHighPrinceDalinar -2 points-1 points0 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
OP why do you feel the need to broadcast that you're a virgin?
[–]ExpiredPilot -2 points-1 points0 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Women aren’t shoes.
[–][deleted] -2 points-1 points0 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Wtf is with the influx of shitty incel humor
[–]General_GTFO -2 points-1 points0 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
This is a shit take and shame on you for perpetuating it.
[–]joyno191912 -2 points-1 points0 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Lame af
[–]Siifinia -2 points-1 points0 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
And on today's episode of objectification, women are now shoes
[–]OverNightOats_ -2 points-1 points0 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Sexual history isn’t a big deal. I feel like it would be weird if I was hyper obsessed with my girlfriends past partners. So long as we’re both clean, that’s all that matters to me, tbh.
[–]product_of_boredom -2 points-1 points0 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Is this sub just kind of about being sexist, then?
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.created by /u/dream-hunter
[–]SuspiciousFragrance 1407 points1408 points1409 points (237 children) | Copy Link
[–]FuckRedditsADMIN 398 points399 points400 points (158 children) | Copy Link
[–]Torquemada1970 73 points74 points75 points (127 children) | Copy Link
[–]_INCompl_ 57 points58 points59 points (117 children) | Copy Link
[–]itsmstbetheazz 59 points60 points61 points (23 children) | Copy Link
[–]NotNotLogical 4 points5 points6 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]king_of_the_potato_p 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]abrotherseamus -5 points-4 points-3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[+]abrotherseamus -12 points-11 points-10 points (16 children) | Copy Link
[–]ShitsAndGiggles_72 10 points11 points12 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]abrotherseamus -1 points0 points1 point (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]ShwayNorris 3 points4 points5 points (9 children) | Copy Link
[–]squinla3 19 points20 points21 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] (24 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]Takingbackcontroll 1 point2 points3 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Takingbackcontroll 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[+]_INCompl_ -12 points-11 points-10 points (15 children) | Copy Link
[–]Torquemada1970 6 points7 points8 points (8 children) | Copy Link
[–]_INCompl_ -3 points-2 points-1 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–]Torquemada1970 0 points1 point2 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]_INCompl_ 3 points4 points5 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]skweeky3 points [recovered] (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]Jaktenba 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]_INCompl_ 9 points10 points11 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]jbx0888 -1 points0 points1 point (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]_INCompl_ 8 points9 points10 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]batmansthediddler -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]NotNotLogical -11 points-10 points-9 points (14 children) | Copy Link
[–]_INCompl_ 8 points9 points10 points (11 children) | Copy Link
[–]hvilaichez -3 points-2 points-1 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]NotNotLogical -7 points-6 points-5 points (9 children) | Copy Link
[–]_INCompl_ 4 points5 points6 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–]Torquemada1970 0 points1 point2 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]_INCompl_ 6 points7 points8 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[+]markarious -8 points-7 points-6 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]magnetard 5 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]JawTn1067 -5 points-4 points-3 points (8 children) | Copy Link
[–]Home--Builder 6 points7 points8 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]my-insides-hurt 1 point2 points3 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 9 points10 points11 points (22 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] -8 points-7 points-6 points (14 children) | Copy Link
[–]JakeDC 5 points6 points7 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] -2 points-1 points0 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]JakeDC 7 points8 points9 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]king_of_the_potato_p -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]kaskntithies 5 points6 points7 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]kaskntithies -1 points0 points1 point (5 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]IntensePlatypus -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]KayJeeAy -2 points-1 points0 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Homely_Bonfire 49 points50 points51 points (39 children) | Copy Link
[–]ohyeahilikedat 10 points11 points12 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] (36 children) | Copy Link
[–]Adamantaz 16 points17 points18 points (18 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] (8 children) | Copy Link
[+]SultanSaatana -13 points-12 points-11 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–]ShenTzuKhan 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Arkitekt9 6 points7 points8 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]markarious 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]WDoE 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]lixyna -2 points-1 points0 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Hexalot 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Loktarian 3 points4 points5 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]JawTn1067 -2 points-1 points0 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]hajamieli 23 points24 points25 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]ka6emusha 20 points21 points22 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Tapprunner 22 points23 points24 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]SuspiciousFragrance 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 17 points18 points19 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]harsh_2342 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]icyhotonmynuts 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Tak_Jaehon -3 points-2 points-1 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]robjmcm 16 points17 points18 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]king_of_the_potato_p 14 points15 points16 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]king_of_the_potato_p 3 points4 points5 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Tucojoe 5 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]SamahLama 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]TurtleMOOO -6 points-5 points-4 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]TransScream 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]SuspiciousFragrance 4 points5 points6 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]TurtleMOOO -1 points0 points1 point (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]SuspiciousFragrance -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Inadover -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]SippingBinJuice 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]STAYotte -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 164 points165 points166 points (22 children) | Copy Link
[–]OneEyedEyehole 58 points59 points60 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]andreavucetich 15 points16 points17 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]Turtle08atwork 1 point2 points3 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]dtwatts 149 points150 points151 points (8 children) | Copy Link
[–]chappychap1234 47 points48 points49 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]wildmeli 18 points19 points20 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]saltydingleberry 10 points11 points12 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Assid_rain_ -2 points-1 points0 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]saltydingleberry -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]dtwatts 7 points8 points9 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] (22 children) | Copy Link
[–]Hyena_The 31 points32 points33 points
(20 children) | Copy Link
[–]hezaaaaa 30 points31 points32 points (12 children) | Copy Link
[–]Tonroz 19 points20 points21 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]saltydingleberry 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]paintballboi07 8 points9 points10 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]78343437 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]Assid_rain_ 5 points6 points7 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]MoistGrannySixtyNine 2 points3 points4 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]Hyena_The 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]MoistGrannySixtyNine 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]redhandsblackfuture 4 points5 points6 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] (19 children) | Copy Link
[–]pwg2 87 points88 points89 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]stappernn 54 points55 points56 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]throwawaycoventry79 24 points25 points26 points (8 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] (4 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]twiggy572 10 points11 points12 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]i_accidently_reddit 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]StockAL3Xj 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]SultanSaatana -16 points-15 points-14 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]Adamantaz 6 points7 points8 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Lone-organism -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]king_of_the_potato_p -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] (30 children) | Copy Link
[–]avadakabitch 55 points56 points57 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]Inadover 14 points15 points16 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]nonnarB 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Murderdoll197666 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Diemme_Cosplayer 14 points15 points16 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]jordenwuj 3 points4 points5 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]grissomza -1 points0 points1 point
(2 children) | Copy Link
[–]twiggy572 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (9 children) | Copy Link
[–]TheTreeOfLiberty 1 point2 points3 points (8 children) | Copy Link
[+]dutchcourage- -8 points-7 points-6 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]ILikeToArgueALot 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]YoviQ 256 points257 points258 points (72 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points (14 children) | Copy Link
[–]hamster_rustler 0 points1 point2 points (12 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (11 children) | Copy Link
[–]hamster_rustler 2 points3 points4 points (10 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (9 children) | Copy Link
[–]hamster_rustler 1 point2 points3 points (8 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point (7 children) | Copy Link
[–]hamster_rustler 2 points3 points4 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]uwu_wu 49 points50 points51 points (26 children) | Copy Link
[–]AnotherEdgyUsername 20 points21 points22 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]wildmeli 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]josemartin2211 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]YoviQ 12 points13 points14 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[+]tendaga -7 points-6 points-5 points (15 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 9 points10 points11 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]trapsaregaydontatme -10 points-9 points-8 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–]TheTreeOfLiberty 6 points7 points8 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Graf_Orloff 10 points11 points12 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]SystemFolder -1 points0 points1 point (9 children) | Copy Link
[–]YoviQ 1 point2 points3 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]ShwayNorris 2 points3 points4 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]SystemFolder 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]YoviQ 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]DrewblesG 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]ConmanConnors 174 points175 points176 points (20 children) | Copy Link
[–]xinxinel14 points [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]king_of_the_potato_p -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]valley_G 15 points16 points17 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Boomer84 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]SultanSaatana -7 points-6 points-5 points (11 children) | Copy Link
[–]TheDemonPants 12 points13 points14 points (10 children) | Copy Link
[–]SultanSaatana -3 points-2 points-1 points (9 children) | Copy Link
[–]TheDemonPants 5 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]grissomza -3 points-2 points-1 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–]SultanSaatana 0 points1 point2 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]grissomza -3 points-2 points-1 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]SultanSaatana 1 point2 points3 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]grissomza 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]trapsaregaydontatme -4 points-3 points-2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]MrPeppa 2 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]grissomza -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]CrazyPascu -9 points-8 points-7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]BloxerTheBlob -6 points-5 points-4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]ConmanConnors -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]rafa_azul3 47 points48 points49 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]RedHood91939 115 points116 points117 points (33 children) | Copy Link
[–]iheartmagic 47 points48 points49 points (18 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]hahkaymahtay 37 points38 points39 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]__2st__ 77 points78 points79 points (31 children) | Copy Link
[–]SultanSaatana 18 points19 points20 points (30 children) | Copy Link
[–]sirgregg 13 points14 points15 points (25 children) | Copy Link
[–]grissomza 13 points14 points15 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 7 points8 points9 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]sirgregg 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]ILikeToArgueALot 7 points8 points9 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]bistix -1 points0 points1 point (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]ILikeToArgueALot 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]pacmatt27 3 points4 points5 points (13 children) | Copy Link
[–]A_Rampaging_Hobo 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]sirgregg 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] -4 points-3 points-2 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]valley_G 47 points48 points49 points (20 children) | Copy Link
[–]Aeolsu 5 points6 points7 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Timmy24000 15 points16 points17 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]valley_G 15 points16 points17 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Donavato 8 points9 points10 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]valley_G 13 points14 points15 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]ILikeToArgueALot -1 points0 points1 point (12 children) | Copy Link
[–]valley_G 0 points1 point2 points (11 children) | Copy Link
[–]Grateful_Breadd 7 points8 points9 points
(2 children) | Copy Link
[–]ILikeToArgueALot 3 points4 points5 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Grateful_Breadd 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]ILikeToArgueALot 3 points4 points5 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–]valley_G 2 points3 points4 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]ILikeToArgueALot 0 points1 point2 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]valley_G 1 point2 points3 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]ILikeToArgueALot 4 points5 points6 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]ILikeToArgueALot 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]CrossError404 -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]cheddoar 63 points64 points65 points (62 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 21 points22 points23 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–]suck_it_gaben 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Grizzly4nicator 7 points8 points9 points (46 children) | Copy Link
[+]Innitbruvinnit -8 points-7 points-6 points (11 children) | Copy Link
[–]Weve_GotDodgsonHere 10 points11 points12 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–]Grizzly4nicator 3 points4 points5 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[+]valley_G -7 points-6 points-5 points (27 children) | Copy Link
[–]Grizzly4nicator 3 points4 points5 points (26 children) | Copy Link
[–]cheddoar -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Helghast92 21 points22 points23 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]OneEyedEyehole 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]RatingsOutOfTen -1 points0 points1 point (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]hamster_rustler 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]SilvesbertStallone 41 points42 points43 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] (8 children) | Copy Link
[–]TheDemonPants 7 points8 points9 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]bocephus67 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]ourmet -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] -3 points-2 points-1 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]SilverReverie 3 points4 points5 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]SilverReverie 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Insane_Chris 16 points17 points18 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]someevilwhitemen 1 point2 points3 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Danamaganza 35 points36 points37 points (12 children) | Copy Link
[–]PrettyHeckinFashy 1 point2 points3 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]Danamaganza 0 points1 point2 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]PrettyHeckinFashy 1 point2 points3 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Danamaganza 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]PrettyHeckinFashy 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]N00bsir301 -27 points-26 points-25 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]cladinacape 21 points22 points23 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[+]N00bsir301 -19 points-18 points-17 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]lixyna 7 points8 points9 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]Chr15t0 3 points4 points5 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]lixyna 6 points7 points8 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]bocephus67 5 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]dman71215 19 points20 points21 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]Ilikepizza_228 3 points4 points5 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]bocephus67 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]BlackendLight -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]ILikeToArgueALot 5 points6 points7 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]someevilwhitemen 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]MicrowavedBrownie 16 points17 points18 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]DrINF3RNO 12 points13 points14 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]ParallelTony7 points [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]RatingsOutOfTen 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]qwertybuttz 3 points4 points5 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]someevilwhitemen 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]MoistGrannySixtyNine 2 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Noshamina 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Snoo33176 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]WamJammy 8 points9 points10 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]bocephus67 9 points10 points11 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Waffle626 5 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]nqsoa 8 points9 points10 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]cagedb1rd 9 points10 points11 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Hippo_Operator 11 points12 points13 points (8 children) | Copy Link
[–]UAintMyFriendPalooka 2 points3 points4 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Hippo_Operator -1 points0 points1 point (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]MoistGrannySixtyNine 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] (4 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 22 points23 points24 points (55 children) | Copy Link
[–]DrINF3RNO 3 points4 points5 points (16 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Neldot 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Boomer84 -1 points0 points1 point (8 children) | Copy Link
[–]someevilwhitemen 3 points4 points5 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]DrINF3RNO 3 points4 points5 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Boomer84 -4 points-3 points-2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Torquemada1970 -2 points-1 points0 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]DrINF3RNO 3 points4 points5 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]Amilo159 3 points4 points5 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]PrettyHeckinFashy 1 point2 points3 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]AvenDonn 1 point2 points3 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]koki1235 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]DredThis 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]OddJackfruit6 7 points8 points9 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]OddJackfruit6 10 points11 points12 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]HowAreTheseSocks 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]datastelessgentleman 3 points4 points5 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Turtle08atwork 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]rissaroni_19 10 points11 points12 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Jbell_Lucas 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]DredThis 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]NineFingeredZach 7 points8 points9 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Ragabadoodaa 9 points10 points11 points (8 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]someevilwhitemen 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Ragabadoodaa 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]NineFingeredZach 7 points8 points9 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]Ragabadoodaa 2 points3 points4 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]GabKoost 3 points4 points5 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]johnchapel6 points [recovered] (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]thiscrayy 6 points7 points8 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 6 points7 points8 points (9 children) | Copy Link
[–]RatingsOutOfTen 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]TheDemonPants -9 points-8 points-7 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–]PrettyHeckinFashy 4 points5 points6 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]ddelGuy 4 points5 points6 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]RatingsOutOfTen 8 points9 points10 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]BreakTheIce216 4 points5 points6 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]RatingsOutOfTen 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]ofekt92 6 points7 points8 points (16 children) | Copy Link
[–]RatingsOutOfTen 4 points5 points6 points (14 children) | Copy Link
[–]someevilwhitemen 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]succeedaphile 7 points8 points9 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]stalkakuma 5 points6 points7 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 6 points7 points8 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Philosophipster 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]theanxiousbandit 2 points3 points4 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]RatingsOutOfTen -1 points0 points1 point (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]MrPeppa 2 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Azurlos-1871 3 points4 points5 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]RatingsOutOfTen 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]DucklingsF_cklings 4 points5 points6 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]someevilwhitemen 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]StpPstngMmsOnMyPrnAp 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Avocado_OverDose 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Blunt_Sage 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]1nf1n1t3_Sag3 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]hnug2 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]gmikoner 3 points4 points5 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]KayJeeAy 0 points1 point2 points (12 children) | Copy Link
[–]RatingsOutOfTen 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Nuttin_Up 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]missyeve99 -1 points0 points1 point (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]RatingsOutOfTen 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] -5 points-4 points-3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]PrettyHeckinFashy 6 points7 points8 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]abilgec 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Old-Man-of-the-Sea 1 point2 points3 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]someevilwhitemen 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] (12 children) | Copy Link
[+]THIESN123 -10 points-9 points-8 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]queernhighonblugrass 0 points1 point2 points (10 children) | Copy Link
[–]JesterIzDead 1 point2 points3 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]RatingsOutOfTen 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]goinupthegranby 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]trapsaregaydontatme -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]twiggy572 1 point2 points3 points (16 children) | Copy Link
[–]someevilwhitemen 2 points3 points4 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]RatingsOutOfTen 0 points1 point2 points (11 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–]RatingsOutOfTen 1 point2 points3 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]RatingsOutOfTen 1 point2 points3 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]clientfker -3 points-2 points-1 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]grissomza 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] -14 points-13 points-12 points (18 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]KaxyOP 6 points7 points8 points (9 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] -10 points-9 points-8 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–]begon11 8 points9 points10 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]TheDemonPants 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]hnug2 -7 points-6 points-5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Innitbruvinnit 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] (2 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]C20H25N3O-C21H30O2 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]_stonedprobably_ 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]RatingsOutOfTen 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]trapsaregaydontatme -1 points0 points1 point (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]RatingsOutOfTen -1 points0 points1 point (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]DropKikMonkey 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]SkeweredWasabi -4 points-3 points-2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]walkth3earth -3 points-2 points-1 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]RatingsOutOfTen 4 points5 points6 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]walkth3earth 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]icyhotonmynuts 0 points1 point2 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]RatingsOutOfTen 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Serzern 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]istarxh 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Outcast_LG 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]serb2212 -3 points-2 points-1 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]NowFreeToMaim 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Levoxymoron 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]CuntMonteCristo -3 points-2 points-1 points (19 children) | Copy Link
[–]RatingsOutOfTen 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points (16 children) | Copy Link
[–]West-Painter 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]SultanSaatana -5 points-4 points-3 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–]trapsaregaydontatme 5 points6 points7 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]SultanSaatana -3 points-2 points-1 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]UppermostKhan -5 points-4 points-3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]RatingsOutOfTen 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]MadnessReloaded 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]NoTalkNoJutsu -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] -3 points-2 points-1 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]RatingsOutOfTen 2 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]JustThatGuyBen -2 points-1 points0 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]RatingsOutOfTen 2 points3 points4 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[+]AvenDonn -16 points-15 points-14 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] -16 points-15 points-14 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Izzyb231 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Moxdonalds -4 points-3 points-2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]C20H25N3O-C21H30O2 -1 points0 points1 point (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]AhmedBVB -3 points-2 points-1 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]RatingsOutOfTen -1 points0 points1 point (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Turtle08atwork -4 points-3 points-2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]thearticulategrunt -5 points-4 points-3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]gothpunkboy89 -6 points-5 points-4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]MaesterPraetor -5 points-4 points-3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] -3 points-2 points-1 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]outofnames11 -6 points-5 points-4 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]RatingsOutOfTen 4 points5 points6 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]nanatavares -3 points-2 points-1 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]BadJokeCentral5 -2 points-1 points0 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]gchaudh2 -6 points-5 points-4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]YummyGummyDrops -7 points-6 points-5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Phalexan -2 points-1 points0 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]canada_is_best_ -3 points-2 points-1 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]RatingsOutOfTen 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]brettbri5694 -3 points-2 points-1 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]AmdM78 -4 points-3 points-2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Outcast_LG -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]chodan9 -3 points-2 points-1 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Sultan6 -4 points-3 points-2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]GarnetDivine -2 points-1 points0 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]IndigoSunsets_ -2 points-1 points0 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]TheHighPrinceDalinar -2 points-1 points0 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]ExpiredPilot -2 points-1 points0 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] -2 points-1 points0 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]General_GTFO -2 points-1 points0 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]joyno191912 -2 points-1 points0 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Siifinia -2 points-1 points0 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]OverNightOats_ -2 points-1 points0 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]product_of_boredom -2 points-1 points0 points (0 children) | Copy Link