Hey all,

I had an interesting interaction last night that, even at the time, I found very fascinating based on how organic and natural it was, and how it seemed to confirm parts of TRP theory.

But first, some background. As far as me goes, I'm left leaning politically and definitely do not subscribe to TRP. My only real point of contention with general left leaning ideology is that I do think that men in the West experience a great deal of life-altering sexism (although I also think that women certainly do as well).

My workplace is in the aerospace industry and is thus male-dominated, probably 80-90% male. Yesterday, there was a happy hour type event at a local brewery and I found myself and a few others chatting with each other. One of us is a younger (early-mid 20s) lady and is pretty awesome, very good at her job, hard working, etc. If it's relevant, she is a white southern Christian, but no extreme or strange views as far as I'm aware, so I believe her views on flirting/etc are probably a good data point for general society. I am in my early 30s.

We were talking about a buffoon we work with and she mentioned that he had flirted with her a few times creepily, but it wasn't a big deal. I asked what did she mean, because if someone is being unprofessional at work, then that is definitely a big deal. She said that he had complimented her hair and such, but when she shut him down by saying that she had a boyfriend, he didn't persist. Fair enough, he made a small advance, she expressed disinterest, it was over. However, she went on to say that that is not how you ought to flirt, nor compliment someone.

Naturally, I asked how one ought to flirt or, separately, compliment someone without being creepy. To flirt without being creepy, according to her, it'd have to be something like her and a coworker chatting/working together and an innocent compliment (your hair looks good today, for example) coming up organically. For the record, I would never, ever in the workplace make such a compliment, and I regularly get feedback from men and women both that I'm really friendly and helpful, so it isn't like I'm just impossible to interact with in general lol.

I then asked how one ought to flirt and potentially enter relationships at work, since she mentioned that she does not like dating apps and prefers to meet people organically. To flirt well and create a good romantic relationship at work, this is what she suggested.

  • Make friends at work
  • Hang out, as friends, outside of work
  • Escalate through flirting, etc
  • Then, enter a relationship

I immediately noticed that this has a few interesting results/problems. So number one, the pipeline she's suggesting is months, which is probably fine, if you're looking for a serious relationship, spending a few months courting someone is a fairly acceptable price of admission, since you won't be doing it numerous times in your life and as you get to know someone as friends, you may well stop pursuing them. However, it also puts 100% of the onus on men, permits women to be totally passive as they are pursued and thus pedestalized, and it results in the few women in a male-dominated workplace being treated really well by "friendly" men and then having their pick of the litter when it comes to actually being in a relationship. This is as close to proof positive of what I'd generally call the more nonsensical parts of TRP theory, with beta orbiters and male harems and all that sort of thing. Separately, and perhaps less significantly, many women also (and very understandably!) complain about men who only make "friends" with them in order to hopefully date them, and when it becomes clear that no dating will occur, dropping them as "friends."

To push back against my interpretation, she never did mention gender once when it comes to this dating schema, and yeah, some women will say that they sometimes are proactive with dating, and a few women actually do flirt/pursue men. Even so, I think I have a big problem with the pursuer-pursued dynamic... it's unbalanced and thus unfair. As well, even if the pipeline suggested is gender-neutral on its face, if in practice its implementation is that 90-95% of the time, men are the ones doing all the active and proactive work (which is damned sure going to be the case because that's how it is in almost all cases, especially in male majority environments), that's still unacceptable.

Anyway, I found the conversation fascinating even as I was having it, and was careful to think things through. I recall the conversation taking a different turn shortly after this... I didn't want to cling to the issue let alone make it a gender issue, let alone bring up TRP or other strange philosophies. Even so, after turning it over in my head a few times, it really does seem to be a confirmation of the idea of women wanting several "friends" hanging around them as a pool of applicants that they can choose from.