"At least 25% of college educated women will not be able to marry college educated men"

FallenAngel17 · 2014-06-19T20:26:11+00:00

[permanently deleted]

FallenAngel17 · 2014-06-19T20:49:45+00:00

This comment sums it up perfectly:

Women proving their irrational natures with contradictory expectations that the majority of them seem all too oblivious to. They don't want men having all the power but they all want families with men with more power than them. Its an unworkable dichotomy and allowing this craziness to continue spells nothing but disaster for society. Seeing as women won't mate with men lower status than them they need to get their heads out of the clouds and realize that reaching the boardroom drastically reduces their marital options, and no, not every woman can marry the ceo.

leftajar · 2014-06-20T03:58:18+00:00

It's very tempting to say, "fuck those women. They're not my problem."

Except that, this affects us too. The educational system is categorically fucking over males. As a result, an entire generation of men will have a lower SMV, while the women stay the same or even elevate. This is really frickin' bad, because it foreshadows the breakdown of the family.

It's a chain reaction:

Many of those "excess" college women will marry a guy with less education.
Many of those women will become dissatisfied and divorce their men.
Those men will be divorce-raped of existing assets, and enslaved of their future assets.
Those men, burdened with emotional and financial problems, will reduce their economic output. Some men will be jailed for missing support payments, and stop contributing anything.
Say there are two million extra divorces. Where before there were two million households, now there are four million: this is massively less efficient and wasteful.
More children will be raised without a man, perpetuating the cycle.

It's important to remember what happens in a divorce-rape. Lots of wealth is transferred to the woman. BUT! A substantial amount of it is simply lost. Lost on lawyers, lost on the doubling of househould bills, and lost on travel money and time for dad to see the kids.

This may not seem like a big deal -- but it is. More divorces means our economy is weaker. Take the financial/emotional bullshit of a divorce, and multiply across millions of families. The result is an overall waste of human potential that hurts the economy. And all so the corporations, those short-sighted sons of bitches, could sell more luxury goods.

Sorry for the doom & gloom, brothers. Please, prove me wrong.

dicklord_airplane · 2014-06-19T22:48:27+00:00

this strikes a little close to home because i've got a lot of highly educated female friends in our mid 20's who are all headed for this cliff of infertility and dwindling prospects for marriage. you can't say anything about it to them because "that's misogynistic!" yes, reality is cruel.

CornyHoosier · 2014-06-19T20:17:33+00:00

I am a straight, college educate, career-driven man. I take care of myself, have traveled extensivly and am always working to better myself. I have a bunch of fun family and friends, have a great place and am free to do whatever I want.

Riddle me this: Why would I want to change my life?

I have a huge advantage over the other guys in my field who have children, I'm not burdened down with the debt of a spouse or large home and I can leave and do whatever I want at a moments notice. Lets not forget that there is now a 50% change that if I do get married I'll get a divorce and lose half my stuff to someone else; or god forbid if there are children involved and I become shackled to poverty by having to pay child support.

Our society is not geared for marriage. What could marriage possibly have to offer me?

whatsazipper · 2014-06-19T18:55:52+00:00

A recent survey found that women dramatically underestimate how much fertility declines with age. They estimated that a 30 year-old had an 80% chance of getting pregnant in one try. The real likelihood is 30%. They also thought a 40 year-old woman would have a 40% success rate, while those odds are less than 10%.

Where are women getting these odd notions of infinite fertility?

darkstout · 2014-06-19T21:30:23+00:00

Once ~~people~~ women enter their early to mid-twenties, the risk of divorce is reduced. Indeed, ~~people~~ women who postpone marriage until their thirties face a dwindling supply of potential partners – a situation that may increase the likelihood of forming unions with partners who are not good marriage material. In other words, marrying “too late” may increase the risk of having a troubled relationship.

It's too bad feminism doesn't teach women to find a good man while they're young and attractive. Instead women ride the cock carousel until it's too late and they are approaching The Wall.

lesbianDREAMS · 2014-06-20T01:02:33+00:00

[permanently deleted]

LiLJeep101 · 2014-06-19T23:14:22+00:00

But think of it this way, what incentives do women have now to settle down with a non top 20% male? They can ride the carousel into their thirties and then have a baby out of wedlock with a top 20% guy with good genetics and then have it be supported by the government, they don't need anyone but those top genetically blessed guys to get what they want while they're still desirable. To them the rest of all men might as well not exist because until they hit the wall they don't need anything from the bottom 80% majority of men except for them to pay their taxes anyway.

2014-06-20T09:16:20+00:00

"“A decade ago, a campaign by the American Society for Reproductive Medicine sparked a vicious backlash. Ads on public buses in several big cities featured a baby bottle shaped like an hourglass, to warn women their time was running out. But women’s rights groups called it a scare tactic that left women feeling pressured and guilty.”"

In other words: Reality doesn't agree with what I believe in? Blame everyone else.

Beardsman2 · 2014-06-20T00:09:41+00:00

Hypergamy is fine, I appreciate the biological logic of a woman being hypergamous. I would say all people are "hypergamous" in gender specific ways - I would branch swing to a supermodel 10 from my GF if I could, no point in lying. There is nothing wrong with women wanting guys to be higher status than they are, just like I know my GF is a solid 2-3 physical attraction points higher than me on the scale.

The problem arrives when society is not set up to deal with this hypergamy. Ancient cultures said "Ok, you only will remain loyal, raise the kids, provide, and support a man who is higher status than you? Fine - any man who works hard and does what society needs done will be higher status than you." This methodology, while crude, worked in nearly every civilization and kept men and women reasonably happy relative to the alternative (being nomadic / starving). We created religions that boil down to "this is what a man should do to be good and get rewards, if a man does this, then he will be able to spread his genes. This is what a woman should do, if she wants one of these guys to care for her, she will have to be X." The Quran in many sections reads like the magna carta mixed with Maury, outlining basic ideas for settling property and marital disputes, and dishing out punishments for men and women who violate the laws that uphold the crude, but essential functionality of society.

A society has to be based on a realistic philosophy. We started creating rules and philosophies based off of these fantasy concepts, like the image of a hardworking single mother and shitty dad, and this is why America suffers to the degree it does. It's the difference between saying "OK, we know people murder and rape, so we will station cops at high risk locations" and saying "we need to lecture the criminals about murder-culture and rape-culture."

In this case, the reality to be accepted is that women are, and always will be, hypergamous. Just like you will never convince me to fuck a 5 over a 9, women cannot functionally be attracted to lower status guys. So society must essentially keep a substantial portion of men fixed as higher status than women - as sexist as it sounds, men must be higher status than women as a whole in order for family units, the economy, the efficiency of government, etc, to succeed.

Here's a good analysis of the factors involved: http://www.eurasiareview.com/27022014-us-inequality-due-assortative-marriages-analysis/

AnotherLostCause · 2014-06-20T02:54:03+00:00

How many of these "college educated women" have studied something useful?

jethreezy · 2014-06-19T23:05:52+00:00

They will just have to wait their, and with the divorce rate in North America being what it is. A lucky few old gals of that remaining 25% might not even have to wait too long.

2014-06-20T02:50:54+00:00

I actually thought the % would be way higher.

paracog · 2014-06-20T12:40:28+00:00

Given the state of campus sexual assault rulings, women will find it increasingly difficult to hunt for husbands and boyfriends on campus. Possibly this was the jealious and priggish motive of feminists.

2014-06-20T16:28:36+00:00

have you considered getting married while getting those degrees?

watersign · 2014-06-20T03:47:51+00:00

As an "uneducated" white collar professional, all i can say is..oh welll. moar money for toys, vacations and the strip club! instead of using money toward a wedding ring i am going to buy a new dirtbike or streetbike. money that would be spent on building a life for my family will go to a sports car and i will still be able to aggressively invest for retirement. the Lolz i am going to have! jus' another day as a CIS SHYTLORD

ss_camaro · 2014-06-19T20:16:21+00:00

Dat rate too Gatdaym high!

Title	"At least 25% of college educated women will not be able to marry college educated men"
Author	Nemester
Upvotes	249
Comments	225
Date	June 19, 2014 6:22 PM UTC (12 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/TheRedPill
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/28klus/at_least_25_of_college_educated_women_will_not_be/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/TheRedPill/at-least-25-of-college-educated-women-will-not-be.229519 https://theredarchive.com/post/229519

Comments