TRP often claims they are strictly about self-improvement and sexual strategy. In essence, their primary concern is how to get laid and get laid often by a variety of women.

Yet TRP often has some very derogatory things to say about women who sleep around. Some call it "warning women of the consequences of promiscuity" (which is odd because men have those same risks), others claim sluts make poor LTR material and are more likely to cheat/commit paternity fraud. Meanwhile others cite a "natural, biological repulsion" toward promiscuous women that fuels their derision of sluts.

And yet, doesn't that run completely counter to 'sexual strategy'? If TRP was about "male relationship strategy" the slut-shaming would have some merit, but as it stands, it's about having casual sexual encounters.

TRP bemoans LMR and trashes women who don't "put out" on the first date while simultaneously deriding the very women who do. This makes no sense to me. If there weren't any sluts, casual sex would be a lot harder to come by. And if there weren't so much slut-shaming, I'm willing to bet LMR would be less often encountered.

I'm not even talking about double-standards here, I'm talking about engaging in behavior that is in direct opposition to their stated goals.

Note: I'm not saying you have to LTR, love or "celebrate" sluts, but it seems completely illogical to treat them with scorn and hate and shit-talk them to kingdom come when they're the very women who would fuck you on a whim.