Is this Red Pill strategy BS?

So, I’ve noticed than many down-to-earth and sensible Red Pill “coaches” teach the following idea: you [men] need to have sex AS SOON AS POSSIBLE with a woman to kind of “fish-hook” her into falling in love with you. You [men] cannot get sexual too late, because she will get bored and find someone who has more attitude than you.

So, the above premise is what we will discuss here.

Although I consider myself a Red Pill guy (traditional red pill — not modern “gold digger hater” kind of red pill), my personal experience tells the EXACT opposite. Whenever I wait some weeks, or even months, to get sexual, the woman’s desire increases like 10x at least — SPECIALLY when I wait her to “ask” for sex (or at least get confused as to why I’m consistently not getting sexual).

HOWEVER!!!!, I’m from a country (in south america) that don’t regard early-sex as “A MUST” like the USA’s culture. My country is kind of conservative, so not having early-sex is definitely not a problem. I’m explaining this because I’m really not sure if what I’ve reported in the last paragraph is (1) a direct effect of waiting for her to ask for sex OR (2) if its a reflex of my country’s culture OR (3) a mix of both. So please consider this in your opinion.

Do you think this Red Pill strategy to allure a woman into having early-sex is BS? Does it work in the USA better than waiting her to want it more than you?