It's amazing how many nice guys are constantly "looking in the wrong place." Everyone's heard it countless times. It's funny, no matter where nice guys look, it seems to always be wrong. Where are they all looking? Where should they be looking instead? Is there any place to look for women where nice guys are suddenly sexually successful?

Where, precisely, should a nice guy go to inspire lust in a woman and be desired for immediate sex?

(Whether or not it's ultimately acted on.)

There isn't one. Being nice is a terrible sexual strategy. There is no magical place to go in society where kindness is suddenly seen as sexy to women. But that can't ever be admitted. Why? Because if women chase bad men and ignore good men, then women are fucked up creatures and society should control them for their own damn good (as well as our own). So instead of acknowledging that being nice is a poor sexual strategy, people attack the nice guy as being bad at it. Sad Blundercock wants to say it's always the nice guy's fault, because he somehow did it wrong.

The Red Pill helps you dissect Blue Pill idiot-speak. "Looking in the wrong places." "Dating the wrong type of women." "Not all women are like that." It's hilariously stupid, and yet that's the cliche they always repeat. And once they shame the beta male into cowering back into his place, no further thought is given, and the keys to sexual success forever remain a mystery to him. He is socially bludgeoned into submission and refuses to even think forbidden thoughts out of fear.

In fact, he is so utterly defeated that he actually repeats the same bullshit to the next person.

That is the problem with NAWALT. It's the front line of assault on your mind. It allows for people to deny their very own life experiences in favor of group think. Because once people understand that women are backward retards, who crave abuse and despise goodness, they will question why we do silly things like let them vote or run for president.