After much conversation with people who believe in black pill ideology, it has become exceedingly clear that black pill is simply the new blue pill. The old blue pill is mostly dead, their illusion of red pill being a small minority on the internet was shattered after a red piller president. Since then, blue pillers have become much more purple. However, around this time, black pill also started popping up. It was certainly an odd set of beliefs at first and entirely detached from reality, but similar to understanding the concepts of what makes a blue piller blue pill, it started to become apparent that black pill shares those concepts as well. I believe that black pillers are simply blue pillers who choked on the red pill, coughed it up, now they remain blue pill, but altered.

The first of the 2 major differences in red pill and blue pill are that red pill focuses on the differences between the sexes, and blue pill assumes them to be the same. Historically, blue pill tended to believe that men could simply just be women and follow feminine desires and matristic principles, especially in dating and relationships. Red pill abandoned this for pro-masculine desires. The new wave [of black pillers] however, have returned to sex similarity, this time is believing that the women are men. Here, they mostly seem to believe women have the same sexuality as men and care almost exclusively about looks and have spontaneous sexuality as opposed to reactive sexuality that most know women to have. However, due to the fact that they have no real world experience and understanding of human sexual dynamics, they will bleat endlessly about OLD statistics and Chadfishing on tinder that has no connection with real life. I believe that this comes from the fact that since they do not have any experience with women, they incorrectly project their own [male] desires and sexuality onto women.

The second of the 2 major differences between red pill and blue pill are their guiding moralities. Red pill tends to have a heavy egoist/individualist philosophy and understanding of looking out for yourself first, while blue pill is collectivist and concerned with placing moral duties on others. Again, historically blue pill focused on altruism and being a good (moral) person, generally in the Christian or crypto-Christian sense. It was nothing too out of ordinary to have some moral duties to other's well-beings. The arguments tended to be around how far that goes in relationships and dating. Now, the new wave has taken that collectivist moral thought and applied it again to looks. This is often shown in talking about looksmatch, and used in the sense about people getting who they deserve according to looks/genetics. For example, "Becky should not be with Chad, her looksmatch is the average Billy. Chad should not have Stacy AND Becky." Within this framework, Becky has a moral duty to Billy's sexuality. They feel they should be paired with their looksmatch in a just world and that dating outside of it is a sin. I do think that this came about when choking on the red pill individualism, they decided where their "hardships" were generated (their sexuality), before ultimately deciding to remain with a blue pilled collectivism, which leads into the last major concept where they are similar.

Within beliefs about identity and character, blue pill is very tied to labels such as minority status or disability that they do not believe have an internal locus of control, however may have caused hardship. Similarly, black pillers do this with their incel/undesirable status, and are very attached to it, and even use it as leverage in discussions, jockeying amongst themselves. Red pill actively rejects these and sees them as disadvantageous, opting for self-positive and pro-masculine labels. With regard to character, blue pill and black pill both remain rigid, while red pill believes the individual should change to fit success. It used to be a meme that blue pillers would say "just be yourself", however, they did believe that you should stay true to yourself because you have some core self that should not change. Now, black pill takes this as a moral command, and has a no compromise approach to improving their character or personality, claiming there is no need to develop hobbies, talents, charisma, or anything really. Some do start going to the gym as an improvement, however, it often tends to be the wrong reasons and is entirely tied to looks. (Similarly, many will talk about plastic surgery.) Red pill has always taken the opposite approach: to change into what is successful and emulate the successful people that you want to be. Any red pill changes in aesthetic were to become pro-masculine, which is viewed as a successful template.

There are a lot of other minor similarities that are derivatives of these, but these are the major ones that show that black pill and blue pill are conceptually similar. Another minor instance for example, black pill and blue pill seem to both treat this topic as science and require studies, black pill has definitely taken up the mantle that blue pill used to about red pill not being science, and attempting to use studies to prove their side. Black pill and blue pill are also both very concerned with how women think about things, albeit for entirely different reasons. Red pill philosophy was always to never listen to women.

TL;DR Black pill is just blue pill with r-slurred looks nonsense.