So this thread is trending on askwomen, title is "What's a male societal issue you aren't empathic towards?"

I find it a disgusting, hateful, selfish, hypocritical and sexist thread, and seeing how high the following comments are upvoted, I have to say, it's worrying if this is how most women feel.

Start with this one

https://np.reddit.com/r/AskWomen/comments/metlth/whats_a_male_societal_issue_you_arent_empathetic/gsjocyw/

I'm probably gonna get shit on for this but i don't agree with the existence of the mra. To me that implies that men were at one point lacking rights and that simply isn't true at all.

Ok, so you don't think the mens rights movement should even exist, which is hypocritical for a feminist woman to say, as feminist women don't like when men try and lecture them about their own lived experience. The mens rights movement isn't about her, and as a a woman, she is unaffected by many male issues. Who is she to say it shouldn't exist?

https://np.reddit.com/r/AskWomen/comments/metlth/whats_a_male_societal_issue_you_arent_empathetic/gskn8g7/

Tbh, this will be unpopular, but all of them. Men have literally been practically in charge of the entire world for hundreds of years. "societal issues"? Please. Cry me a river. Come back to me when the government is in charge or your body. Or maybe when they decide if you have the right to vote. Or the right to work. Or the right to equal pay. Get over yourselves.

...All of them? So domestic violence, homelessness, conscription, she just...doesn't care? I guess it's easy not to care when it doesn't affect you. And that user, according to their post history, has sons...so if one of her sons is the victim in an abusive relationship, she'll just tell him to cry her a river? Wow...

Circumcision and how men compare it to female genital mutilation.

so you're not sympathetic to baby boys having erogenous tissue ripped off? you're not sympathetic that i dont have a frenulum or ridged band? is your argument because of FGM? (which didnt happen to you)? so if FGM didnt exist, suddenly circumcision would matter? but it only DOESNT matter because something else happens to exist?

https://np.reddit.com/r/AskWomen/comments/metlth/whats_a_male_societal_issue_you_arent_empathetic/gslzy1r/

Men thinking they have any say over a woman's rights or body. I'm sorry, you don't have a vagina yet want to have an opinion on mine? Fuck completely off.

this goes for circumcision. and if she upvoted the example above this one, completely fuck off.

https://np.reddit.com/r/AskWomen/comments/metlth/whats_a_male_societal_issue_you_arent_empathetic/gsjyxzz/

https://np.reddit.com/r/AskWomen/comments/metlth/whats_a_male_societal_issue_you_arent_empathetic/gsjyxzz/

how does that justify unfairness in family courts though? what does that have to do with unequal custody without justification?

https://np.reddit.com/r/AskWomen/comments/metlth/whats_a_male_societal_issue_you_arent_empathetic/gslyo0o/

Honestly, the draft. Personally believe it should be outlawed. Like if the government can't find enough people to volunteer to go to war maybe we shouldn't go to war. But also men are like "women should be drafted too, it's not fair." I'm usually like "buddy, you're never gonna believe who set that system up lol. "

so...you're not empathetic to the mostly 18-22 years who died forever during the Vietnam War after being drafted? Throwing in "I think it should be outlawed" doesn't erase what this answer is- something she is not empathetic to. She's not empathetic to boys who died?

The comment below is pretty scary too:

Not only that, but picture the next major world war. If we send millions of Americans to war with the draft, who is gonna repopulate the country? It’s probably a weird way of thinking, but the population will bounce back faster with more women alive to reproduce.

Which is nonsense, a 50:50 ratio is optimal to avoid incest. 20% men and 80% women would lead to lots of half siblings reproducing.

https://np.reddit.com/r/AskWomen/comments/metlth/whats_a_male_societal_issue_you_arent_empathetic/gsltl1x/

When they complain about not having enough shelters for homeless/abused males. Women-only shelters were created by women for women because we know that, no matter where we are or how much money we have, men will prey on us. This is especially true for homeless women, who are often the targets of rape and abuse by homeless and non-homeless men alike. So what did women do? We helped our sisters! Now men see what we've accomplished by ourselves and are mad that they can't take advantage of it. Bullshit!

Wow...so a lack of shelters for abused and homeless men is something she has no empathy for?

Her argument is very flawed because the majority of shelters come from government funding and taxes. Male shelters simply receive less funding and are ignored, partially because feminists push the myth that men are rarely true victims of domestic violence thus shelters aren't needed. This is a particular hypocritcal thing for a feminist to say, as it completely flies in the face of "dismantling gender roles.' It perpetuates gender roles

And these are likely some of the same people who upvoted the 'mens rights movement doesnt need to exist.' Pretty disgusting, imo. This thread is an example why the MRM needs to exist so much...