TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

    • /r/AllPillDebate
    • /r/AlreadyRed
    • /r/altTRP
    • /r/AntiFeminists
    • /r/askFDS
    • /r/askMRP
    • /r/askRPC
    • /r/becomeaman
    • /r/BlackPillScience
    • /r/Chadfish
    • /r/Divorce_Men
    • /r/EverydayMisandry
    • /r/ExRedPill
    • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
    • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
    • /r/GEOTRP
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • /r/MalePsychology
    • /r/Male_Studies
    • /r/MenSupportMen
    • /r/MGTOW2
    • /r/MuslimRedPill
    • /r/newTRP
    • /r/PussyPass
    • /r/PussyPassDenied
    • /r/RedPillBooks
    • /r/RedPillParenting
    • /r/RedPillWives
    • /r/RedPillWomen
    • /r/RedPillWorkplace
    • /r/RPChristians
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/ThankTRP
    • /r/TheRedPillStories
    • /r/trpGAME
    • /r/TRPOffTopic
    • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
    • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

    • Artful Prudence
    • A Voice for Men
    • Alpha Game
    • Black Label Logic
    • Caleb Jones
    • Captain Capitalism
    • Corporate Machiavelli
    • Days of Game
    • Deep Strength
    • Dicipres
    • Donal Graeme
    • Female Misogynist
    • Free Northerner
    • Gaming My Wife
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • In Mala Fide
    • KillToParty
    • Kill Your Inner Loser
    • Krauser PUA
    • LaidNYC
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • NO MA'AM
    • Omega Virgin Revolt
    • Pook's Mill
    • Random Xpat Rantings
    • Red Pill Theory
    • Red Pill Wifery
    • RedPillDad
    • RedPillDoctor
    • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
    • Sigma Frame
    • The Feminine Woman
    • The Futurist
    • The Masculine Principle
    • The Modern Man
    • The New Modern Man
    • The Obsidian Files
    • The Power Moves
    • The Private Man
    • The Red Pill Room
    • The Red Quest
    • The Rules Revisited
    • The Spearhead
    • Troy Francis
    • Wintery Knight
    • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

When women do more household labor, they see their partner as a dependent and sexual desire dwindles.

Glum-One816

December 12, 2022
242 upvotes
/r/MensRights

https://www.reddit.com/r/psychology/comments/zk1o19/when_women_do_more_household_labor_they_see_their/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android_app&utm_name=androidcss&utm_term=2&utm_content=share_button

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title When women do more household labor, they see their partner as a dependent and sexual desire dwindles.
Author

Glum-One816

Upvotes 242
Comments 141
Date December 12, 2022 4:11 PM UTC
(3 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/zk39xp/when_women_do_more_household_labor_they_see_their/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/when-women-do-more-household-labor-they-see-their.1144131
https://theredarchive.com/post/1144131
Top posts by Glum-One816

Horrifying woman-on-man rape in Melbourne: Twisted Tinder date says 'no one will believe you' after attack - as victim's mother reveals brutal aftermath

1097 upvotes
June 12, 2026
/r/MensRights

Woman at Gym Complains That Guy is "Staring" at Her, Turns out He's Legally Blind

1097 upvotes
February 16, 2023
/r/MensRights

Woman Stabs Boyfriend in Neck Inside Car in Central Los Angeles

227 upvotes
November 13, 2024
/r/MensRights

A Guy Asked Her Out And She Turned Him Down, But After Her Friend Said He Had Money, She Agreed To Let Him Take Her Out For Dinner Because She Likes That He's Rich

194 upvotes
January 13, 2023
/r/MensRights

So no charges have been filed for this woke ass school.

155 upvotes
July 4, 2021
/r/MensRights

Ex-Russian diplomat warns Putin is willing to sacrifice 20 million soldiers to win the war with Ukraine. I guess he wants all the men at 18-64 years of age or some alternative.

135 upvotes
October 23, 2022
/r/MensRights

That's wrong to brag about it.

129 upvotes
September 5, 2021
/r/MensRights

Tiktok accounts need to be held accountable against falsely accused ones. Absolutely, insane.😡 Note: This guy will lose everything in days.

109 upvotes
August 17, 2021
/r/MensRights

Comments

[–]odysseytree 217 points218 points219 points 3 years ago* (22 children) | Copy Link

Then they should leave their partner and should date those men who don't earn, stay at home and will do the household. These studies try to portray women as helpless when being in a relationship is itself is a choice you can opt out from anytime.

[–]Glum-One816[S] 59 points60 points61 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

What's funny? We worked more than we stayed at home. Reversed the situation and see how we feel.

[+]DocRocksPhDont 43 points44 points45 points 3 years ago (18 children) | Copy Link

Did you read this? This isn't a study talking about stay at home moms. It's talking about your average couple where both the man and the woman works, and the guy doesn't do anything at home.

I wouldn't want to fuck the deadbeat who said I had to do al the cleaning and cooking myself in addition to also working full time. Fuck that no matter which gender you are.

[–]CentralAdmin 45 points46 points47 points 3 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Sure but the point is they apply it to one gender and the discrimination against men continues. It reinforces the perception that men are out having fun at work while women are taking up a second shift.

I pointed out the double standard regarding how gender roles for men are still expected while they vanished for women and got downvoted to oblivion.

A poster said they would not want to date a lazy man child but that parent-child dynamic is supposedly okay when men are the parent. Men must adhere to their gender role by earning more, protecting their wives and doing all the dirty jobs at home like home and vehicle maintenance. If she calls him daddy it's okay. He must provide and protect like her dad did. But if she must cook and clean like mom did we have more of a problem with it.

It is hypocritical of women to want men to adhere to their gender role while expecting men to not want women to adhere to theirs. Imagine if a study came out saying men lose attraction to lazy wives who won't cook or clean. How well would that be received?

I am currently on -75 downvotes there XD

[–]ReeditUser24601 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yep. New day, same story. Feminists take something which is universal, ignore how it impacts men, exaggerate how it impacts women, and conclude that it's all misogyny, and that men are the bad guys. It's all so tiresome.

[+]DocRocksPhDont 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I literally just said that lazy wives who don't want to work or clean are deadbeats and I wouldn't have sex with them. This isnt the big.deal you think it is

[–]CentralAdmin 3 points4 points5 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

You missed the point of it reinforcing the belief that men are lazy. You not wanting to fuck a deadbeat is fine but you ignored the wider context. It isn't framed as "partners lose attraction to lazy partners".

[+]DocRocksPhDont -1 points0 points1 point 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It was a study that explored lack of sex in relationships. Men are disproportionately experiencing their partner losing attraction. This study wasn't some conspiracy to shit on men. It was trying to study why they aren't attractive to their long term spouses

[+]sofi-ribe 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Whoever says anybody at work is having fun lacks a fundamental understanding of our economic and social paradigm (or should I say mode of production?). That's a stupid ass take.

Maybe we should stop trying to force people do adhere to gender roles, and think about what's better for the greater good, for society. Everyone should work, have autonomy, and share household responsibilities. Neither should be a thing for one gender or another. That's just a human responsibility.

Edit: I forgot to type a word.

[–]12_nick_12 25 points26 points27 points 3 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

How does this work when the woman is working 25 hours and the man is working 60 hours? Would you expect the man to do the same amount of house chores?

[–]kiadragon 12 points13 points14 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Fair question. Everyone seems to be assuming equal workload outside the home.

[+]DocRocksPhDont -5 points-4 points-3 points 3 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

That's bull. This isnt the 1950s. Most families are dual income now. I'm a woman and the breadwinner in my family. Now that I work more, he does more at home. There was a time it was the opposite. It's about balance and this article was talking about guys becoming dependents. You missed the entire point of the article and the study. You are talking about exceptions to the rule. The study is looking at partners who dont contribute equally. Period.

[–]rabel111 10 points11 points12 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Maybe they should have talked about men and women who become dependents. Most of the women I know who claim to be doing the biggest share of domestic duties, are garnishing the lilly.

[+]DocRocksPhDont 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

What is garnishing the lilly

[–]rabel111 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Exaggerating. Making something bigger, more important or more impressive than it really is. In this instance, many women clim to be doing hours of work in the home, when really they are as lazy as the men they are criticising.

[–]odysseytree 10 points11 points12 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Most women aren't doing more hours than their husband at office because most women desire men who have greater socio-economic status than them which means more hours in office. Also, house maintenance work is still done by men regardless of number of hours spent at workplace.

[+]DocRocksPhDont 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

How old are you?

This is not the case for my generation. I'm the breadwinner in my family. Most of my friends work equal amounts and contribute pretty equally. Most jobs are.40 hours a week or more and women make up half the work force, so your numbers don't really add up.

[–]ReeditUser24601 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Most families are dual income now.

Source?

In my anecdotal evidence, every couple I know falls into one of the following categories:

1) Man works, woman doesn't.

2) Man works a full-time career position capable of supporting their family unit, woman works part-time and/or a position which is clearly not intended to become a career, and will likely quit in the next few years.

You can lie all you want, but it doesn't change the fact that men are still overwhelmingly expected to be the breadwinner.

[+]DocRocksPhDont 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

53% of households are dual income. Even higher for millennials.

https://www.magnifymoney.com/news/dual-income-households-study/

Again, how old are you?

[–]guardian416 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Having a dual income does not prove who works more. When you look at jobs that have the most hours such as truck driver, soldier, firefighter, mining workers… etc. they are completely dominated by men.

[+]DocRocksPhDont 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

Sorry, but if you are both working you still need to be contributing some percent to cleaning. If he works 60 hours and she works 40, he should still be helping with at least 20% of the housework.

Right now, I work more and make the bulk of the money, so I don't do as much of the housework as my husband, but I still contribute by cooking dinner a few nights a week and doing the bulk of the cleaning on the weekends.

It's about balance. This article says that problems arise when it is unbalanced.. obviously

[–]oneoffhefrenchgirls 3 points4 points5 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This makes me mad all the time. I see girls on TikToks complaining about their boyfriends and Im always commenting “here’s a crazy idea, leave? You’re not a hostage. You staying means you’re okay with it so why should anyone care?”

[–]Capn--Flint 98 points99 points100 points 3 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

A thing worth noting is how a study like this has been done, the method can make a big difference on results. I see some potential bias in this study.

Firstly it's done via a survey site, which means it's self reporting, which is less credible than an actual interview.

The questions that are posed can in itself nudge the participants in answering in a certain way, and self-reporting is very susceptible to that.

The women that choose to participate may share some characteristics, for example they may have been dissatisfied with the division of labour in advance and therefore be interested in venting that frustration, hence skewing results.

Secondly, and this is an important fact, the women that was included in the study had to meet the following criteria; "cohabiting with someone who identifies as a man for six months or longer and living with a dependent 12 years of age or younger."

This means that there is a child involved which means this is a study about mothers or foster mothers, not women in general. The distribution of household chores may be a proxy of the satisfaction with the quality and distribution of the tasks in child rearing.

I wouldn't consider results from a study with this method to be particularily good evidence.

Edit: spelling.

[–]Commercial_Ad_4522 9 points10 points11 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yess thank you. I love that you wrote out the issues with the study

[+]A_Good_Soul 16 points17 points18 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I appreciate your thorough and logical response. Nothing sensational or tribal about it, just objective questions and scientifically-agreed biases in the methodology to let one draw their own conclusion on the validity.

[–]Fuzzy_Department2799 44 points45 points46 points 3 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

If she is working full time then yes you need to be helping with the household chores. If she is going to college full time then yes you should be helping with the household chores. If she isn't and there aren't multiple non school age kids at home then that math ain't adding up and the dynamic balance of the relationship needs to be addressed.

[–]gafgone5 28 points29 points30 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I work in the military full-time, and when my ex got a part time summer job she stopped EVERYTHING, including things one should do for themselves regularly, screaming "I WORK" whenever she woke me up at 4:30 on a weekend to do dishes.

[+]DocRocksPhDont 3 points4 points5 points 3 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Did nobody read the article? It's not talking about stay at home moms. It's talking about a typical dynamic where both parties work and the guy expects only the woman to do the chores. And it talks about guys becoming dependent who don't want to work or clean. And we are supposed she doesn't want to fuck the deadbeat?

[–]Fuzzy_Department2799 11 points12 points13 points 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Yes I did which is why i said if they are both working full time jobs he should be helping. And if she is going to school full time then yes he should be helping. In fact the article didn't even address if the 700 women surveyed were working or not. It just addressed the perception of unfair division of labor.Which may or not be valid based on their workload. But i will agree can be a major problem for men who expect their partner to work full time and then come home and do all the chores and take care of the kids. Women have been talking about it for years put to many men don't listen because of their own bias.

[–]Nightstalkerjoe2 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Well first of all the person you talking to is wrong

the women that was included in the study had to meet the following criteria; "cohabiting with someone who identifies as a man for six months or longer and living with a dependent 12 years of age or younger."

So it seems yes it is

[–]McSmarfy 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

You're responding to what either appears to be a bot or an NPC. Same response to several comments here, trying to use redirection instead of commenting to the specific content.

[–]Fuzzy_Department2799 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Looking at their post history shows a young feminist who either is still pregnant or recently had a kid. Article probably hit a nerve.

[–]Cybralisk 8 points9 points10 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Modern women are entitled that's why. Traditionally men bankrolled the household and women did the housework. Now women want all the benefits of a traditional man and don't want to do anything for it and society told them that they are special and deserve it.

[+]bluehorserunning 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

You'd have a point if the article were talking about traditional SAHMs, but it's not. It's talking about women who, in most families, are financially forced to work as many hours as their husband. How is it "entitled" in a bad way to want to split the house work if you are also splitting the away work?

[–]Nightstalkerjoe2 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

the women that was included in the study had to meet the following criteria; "cohabiting with someone who identifies as a man for six months or longer and living with a dependent 12 years of age or younger."

So it seems yes it is

[–]NorthwestDM 41 points42 points43 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Let's see here's the actual study: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10508-022-02397-2

Now let's look at the contributors and references.

we've got something published in the 'Archives of Sexual behaviour' a peer-reviewed academic journal in sexology, which should have us worried for a start since sexology is tied pretty strongly to Socialism and feminism, not to mention has a nasty history of promoting child abuse. As a case in point the Archives founder Richard Green argued for attraction to minors being declassified as a mental illness and claimed it was found in "a substantial minority of 'normal people'.

as for the paper in question, the contributing authors include 3, potentially 4 women as the authors one of whom is a representative of the Gender studies department of the Canadian Queen’s University, Kingston Ontario.

And a boatload of feminist studies in the references including the likes of:

'Theorizing race, class, and gender: The new scholarship of Black feminist intellectuals and Black women’s labor'

'Gender and power: Society, the person and sexual politics'

Facilitating wife” and “feckless manchild”: Working mothers’ talk about divisions of care on Mumsnet. Feminism & Psychology.

An intersectional analysis of gender and ethnic stereotypes: Testing three hypotheses. Psychology of Women Quarterly

​

Intersectionality and work–family balance: A study of Black, White, and Mexican-American adults. Advances in Gender Research

Look at this mess, It's a fucking Feminist Psyop, manipulation and political gaslighting at its finest. It even uses bloody newspaper and magazine articles as references in including an opinion piece from the Sydney Morning Herald.

Why are we giving any credence to this without at least inspecting the source fist?

[–]redditvivus 5 points6 points7 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

These are the weakest arguments against the paper. The journal, and I speak from experience, is a reputable one. It focuses on sexual behavior, which does not actually have a political agenda that is uniformly conservative/liberal/etc. Even the gender/sex of the authors is not really that important.

I would be be more judgmental of the study itself. Is it pre-registered, or were the findings and hypotheses ad hoc? How small is the n? Is it comprised mostly of college undergraduates, who are a select population and not representative of other populations/genderations/cultures? I am not reading the study but I would guess yes to the above. It is these faults, and not the backgrounds of the authors, and false assumptions about the journal, that I would lay fault with. And I would guess it's an ad hoc, small-n, non-representative sample, or at least two of the three.

It would make sense that American college females in 2022 would, if sampled in a survey, find it unattractive to follow traditional gender norms. Is water wet?

[–]NorthwestDM 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The journal may not have a political agenda, a claim that I find highly suspect considering the general political bias in psychology in general (Look at the leanings of the BACP as proof of that for the UK), but the authors clearly do when they make heavy use of Gender studies research considering the whole field is based on socialist/communist theories and has man-bashing as a by-line.

I also have to ask how can you speak from experience regarding the journal?

[–]sgt_oddball_17 48 points49 points50 points 3 years ago (17 children) | Copy Link

What happens when men do more household labor?

How come no one ever does that study?

[–]duhhhh 71 points72 points73 points 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Men who do more traditionally male chores get more sex. Men who do more vacuuming, ironing, dishes, etc, get less.

https://www.today.com/health/husbands-who-do-her-chores-have-less-sex-study-finds-1B8172520

[–]kiadragon 15 points16 points17 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yes. Interesting isn't it?

Almost as if women where controlling your sex life based on her appraisal of your work.

Did you marry a wife or your mom?

[–]Glum-One816[S] 19 points20 points21 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Thanks for the stats.

[–]w_cruice 19 points20 points21 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

And the women who responded to the original survey will scoff at that. But I treated one like a princess, she demanded to be queen. I treated her like a queen, she demanded to be king. And then I was the fool...

Need boundaries. In my case, she wasn't working, but kept pushing everything off on me. I stopped allowing it, and there were issues. Funny that, people hate when you treat them, the way they treat you.

[–]odysseytree 37 points38 points39 points 3 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

Maybe men don't judge their partners like that because they love them. The author is making women to look shallow.

[–]sgt_oddball_17 14 points15 points16 points 3 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Bingo

[–]Strigon_7 28 points29 points30 points 3 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

To be fair my own experiences meant that the more work, household labour etc I did the less of hers she did or outright abandoned, moreover the more she withdrew in general. I guess the individual experiences may vary.

[–]duhhhh 13 points14 points15 points 3 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

I had the same experience as you.

[–]oneknocka 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

So did i. And yes, divorce eventually followed. I am much much much happier now

[–]Strigon_7 4 points5 points6 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Did a divorce eventually follow?

[–]duhhhh 14 points15 points16 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Sticking it out for the kids. We live like slobs now though because I refuse to be the only adult picking up the house anymore.

[–]Strigon_7 10 points11 points12 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I eventually found some hope when I woke up and the house was clean... but happiness, I discovered, is a false economy.

[–]Cybralisk 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Well they are. Women are hypergamous by nature, they don't date down we do. In order for a woman to take you seriously as a partner then you must be superior to her or at least someone she considers equal. As soon as you drop below that level she is off looking for someone better again.

[–]ThatGIRLkimT 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

True.

[–]Glum-One816[S] 6 points7 points8 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That's a good question though.

[–]ReeditUser24601 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You know why.

[–]ApprehensiveMail8 -1 points0 points1 point 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

What happens is we aren't interested in having sex with our wives when we've been cleaning all day.

[–]63daddy 24 points25 points26 points 3 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Date women but don’t live with them. Problem solved.

[–]crippledhermit 4 points5 points6 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Cohabitation in this gynocentric world is impossible.

[–]thebluewolf1991 7 points8 points9 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

100%

[–]Glum-One816[S] 8 points9 points10 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Agree. I don't want to date a woman who has a kid in their house.

[+]Rubatose 3 points4 points5 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

...Then don't date a woman with a child???? Wtf? Seriously. If you don't like kids, DO NOT date a woman who has a kid. It's NOT fair to her kid. They're a package deal. If you can't handle it, do her a favor and let her find someone who can.

[–]Glum-One816[S] 9 points10 points11 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That is my own personal preference and I love kids, if it's my own child. Otherwise, I would have said no to my girlfriend or wife. I'm just saying.

[–]WhereProgressIsMade 16 points17 points18 points 3 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

This comment is a bit sad to me since many guys see this kind of advice but don't realize the bigger picture.

Wanna turn your lady on? Clean the house without being asked

That's a gross oversimplification. Too many guys think just "doing more" is the answer on how to be more attractive to her to turn her on, but it's not. Taken to the extreme, it ends up just being simp behavior which ends up backfiring and turning her off even more.

It can work when the situation is that you are already attractive to her but the dishes piling up ends up basically being a c*&# blocker, because her mind drifts toward things that need done instead of sexy time.

Athol Kay goes into this a lot more in his book "Married Man Sex Life Primer".

[–]CaptSnap 4 points5 points6 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Women perform approximately 2.5 more hours per day of household labor relative to men

What the fuck are they doing for two and half hours every single day? How can that be possible? So I had to look it up:

From the source that quote is from (emphasis mine): source if youre curious pdf warning

The total work burden of women and men was equivalent in 2015 (7.8 and 7.6 hours, respectively). However, when unpaid work performed as a simultaneous activity was included, women’s total work burden was an average of 1.2 hours greater per day than men’s in 2010 (9.1 versus 7.9 hours).

Simultaneous activity means that for the last two surveys the researchers have allowed respondents to list multiple things they were doing at once. So if you both vacuum and dust for 30 minutes, thats not 30 minutes of housework, thats 60 minutes of housework. Or if you watch tv for 30 minutes while you put a pizza in the oven for 30 minutes, thats 30 minutes of primary activity and 30 minutes of housework as a secondary activity. Pretty fucking clever huh?

Otherwise the authors wouldnt have anything to talk about but see by fudging the numbers a bit, you can get a woman's day to add up to about 30 hours. So she has time to do about two and half hours of housework every day. (this is the average between those with and without kids) Canadian houses must be goddamn immaculate. I cant imagine how clean my house would be if I paid a housekeeper for just 1 of those hours every day. I used to have one come in once a week and it was practically brand new feeling, but every fucking day? It must be how billionaires live.

I dont know about women I wouldnt speak for them but if I felt it took me two and half hours to get my house in order... EVERY DAY.. of my life, I would be overwhelmed with what a giant fucking waste it all is.

I wonder what percentage of women feel embittered to their spouse after reading academic surveys like this without questioning their methodology.

[–]throwawayincelacc 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Wow... they're really peddling garbage.

So men's tasks are often more intensive meaning they don't multi-task as much, and that gives them a lower value in the study. Amazing.

Looking through the PDF, they obscure the fact that men work far more salary earning on average, and then add on top the the double-counting of time women do on household tasks. the whole purpose is intentionally setup to mislead the reader into thinking women just always do more.

Absolutely disgusting.

[–]saito200 13 points14 points15 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I believe that the fact that someone is dependent on an emotion they don't control rather than commitment to maintain a long term relationship says a lot about their maturity

[–]MGTOWManofMystery 10 points11 points12 points 3 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Was it a random study? Do women find men who do MORE household work more attractive (nothing mentioned about that in the article). Anecdotally, I posit that women don't get turned on and more sexual with partners who do more housework. Men are damned if they do or do not. (My conclusion: men are much better off physically and mentally if they avoid LTRs and avoid marriage).

[+]DocRocksPhDont -1 points0 points1 point 3 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Generally the main reasons state for losing labido in marriage is because they get overwhelmed doing all the work at home and working, so anecdotally there is evidence that men who help at home get more sex. Go look at the dead bedrooms sub

[–]Rock_Granite 6 points7 points8 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Go look at the dead bedrooms sub

I've seen it. Any opinion that does not agree with the feminist orthodoxy over there gets immediately deleted and the author permabanned. What you read does not reflect consensus opinion. It reflects the opinion of several hard core feminist moderators.

[+]DocRocksPhDont 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Lol wtf? Not true at all

[–]Rock_Granite 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Oh no? there's a whole freakin sub (r/banfromdb) that is formed by people who were banned from deadbedrooms just for the crime of wrongthink.

[–]MGTOWManofMystery 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I certainly hope you are right. But I don't see it. Women might want their male partners to do more housework but it doesn't increase their genuine, rip-your-clothes-off desire for hot monkey sex -- which is what most men want. Marriage and LTRs lead inevitably to dead bedrooms. Just say NO!

[–]Square-Ship-9609 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I think living together leads to over-familiarity which leads to a loss of libido. It's a bit hard to want to have hot monkey sex with someone who you know suffers from constipation.

[–]pasta4u 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

What do they think happens when Men do more household labor than their partner ?

[–]Educational_Bet_6606 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Depends, I'd suspect the sex attraction might go down, yet there's couples where the man does more domestic duties anyhow. I'm thinking of Rugrats.

[–]Gunthersalvus 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

You can thank this 3rd wave feminist bull crap movement

[+]bluehorserunning 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

why is it "bull crap" for a woman who works 40 hours and is also on-call at home 24-7 to expect the same from her partner?

[–]toyboy51 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

There are 2 systems: either be quiet and be at home doing house work while husband goes out and earns (kind of impossible in the west nowadays due to cost of living - valid in other sofisticated places such as india) OR equality: both work both share household works and expenses etc

[–]parasitius 7 points8 points9 points 3 years ago* (5 children) | Copy Link

The thing that really gets my goat about these debates is the idea of household chores being some sort of inevitable part of life

I live alone and don't have house guests, and I don't do any sort of household chores - I structure my entire life around not having to do them because I hate them - *exactly* like some people might live in an apartment because they don't take interest in grass, watering flowers, and/or paying for landscaping nonsense

*In case anyone wants to get pedantic, I really mean that I keep my efforts into the intangibly small range like 3-4 minutes average PER DAY, and the compromise involves things like always having to sit to pee & using fans to keep the shower bone dry so it never needs cleaning yet looks like new

[–]ZeldaVelveeta 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Ok but a couple living together, kinda hard to avoid laundry and dishes and errands etc unless they just wear paper gowns and eat out for every single meal

[–]parasitius -1 points0 points1 point 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Many options lol

First of all I wear all designer clothes, you can't really wash a $800 tshirt that much it's just going to spoil it before its time and make the resale value $0. So what one load of laundry per week mostly underwear, a trip to the dry cleaner now and then

It's easy to buy precooked food at the grocery store instead of just eating out and use some chopsticks or free utensils also

So the main problem for me is carrying the trash back to the garbage chute next to my front door every 2-3 days

[–]ZeldaVelveeta 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Fascinating

[–]TipiTapi 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

If you dont clean your apartment regurarly it will be sigusting and unhealthy.

Of course you can hire someone to do it but lots of people either wont have the money (same as for the precooked meals) or they dont want their privacy invaded.

[–]parasitius 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If you dont clean your apartment regurarly it will be sigusting and unhealthy.

Yeah that's what they keep telling themselves. TBH I find people who talk like that are often the same ones who do disgusting things like wearing shoes into the house

Moreover, there are a lot of arbitrary rules. People don't get the upholstery on their couch cleaned every month and don't think it is so bacteria infected to get them sick, YET, they insist bedsheets are filthy constantly. Totally arbitrary rules, even if there is something different you'd need to clean the coach upholstery minimum 1x per every 3 bed sheet changes. . . NO ONE DOES

Why then the bedsheets?, perhaps because they're gross enough to sleep naked? Sleep in a full body sweatsuit with a hood on and your sheets don't get dirty because they never come in contact with oil or skin. Moreover, if you do this you just need to frequently change your pillow cover which takes seconds

[–]VisionarySeagull 6 points7 points8 points 3 years ago* (10 children) | Copy Link

They altered the contents of the study.

When women do more household labor

No, when women perceive themselves as doing more household labor. This study did not measure how much household labor the women actually did; it basically asked them "Do you feel like you put more into the house than your partner?"

Some women will legitimately fuck around on their phone for two hours, do the dishes, and then call doing the dishes a two hour and fifteen minute job.

(Note: some men will do the same. I'm simply saying this because the study is about women.)

[–]mikesteane 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

About the author of this article:

Laura Staloch Laura Staloch

Laura Staloch is a teacher, children's book author, and level III reiki master. She has a master's degree in Psychology and Educational Administration. Her work in the classroom includes teaching advanced psychology courses, and diversity studies.

[–]VisionarySeagull 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

level III reiki master

Unironically her most impressive qualification smh

[–]mikesteane 5 points6 points7 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It might be a more valuable qualification if it was Reiki mistress.

[+]bluehorserunning -1 points0 points1 point 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Why do you think that is more relevant than her Master's of Psychology?

[–]VisionarySeagull 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Because the market is so oversaturated with psych degrees that you basically need to have a Ph.D. in it for it to mean anything whatsoever. I would probably put it in the ten most useless things to study, up there with women's studies, gender studies, and sociology.

[+]bluehorserunning 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It wouldn't matter if everyone was a psych major. The degree is not diluted, the learning is not diluted, by the number of people who have it; the accuracy is not changed by the number of people who have a degree, only the financial remuneration.

And no form of medicine is useless.

[–]TipiTapi 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

I wouldnt go into this angle, women traditionally do most of the regular housework like cleaning, washing dishes, cooking, etc and even in western countries and even when both are working they tend to do it a lot more. Men do things like fixing broken stuff or puting together new furniture.

Cultural things like this are hard to change. I remember when we went to my grandma for Christmas it was always the girls (grandma, my mom+aunt, my sisters) who cooked and my grandma only asked my sisters to help clean. I was chilling in the living room with my grandpa and was only asked to do chores if it was like lifting boxes.

It is understandable why it changes slowly.

[+]bluehorserunning -1 points0 points1 point 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

and when the dude comes home from work and plays video games for four hours, maybe with half an hour of helping the kids with homework, while the gal comes home from work and cooks dinner, vacuums, picks up his dirty laundry, dusts while vacuuming (which makes it take longer, due to changing heads), feeds the pets, cleans the kitchen, etc... If she has to nag him to do chores that he has agreed to do, the same way that she nags the kids to do their chores...

how is he so different from a dependent child, that she has to take care of?

[–]TipiTapi 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I dont think anyone argues that this is a good thing. I dont do that with my gf.

But it is also a harmful stereotype and you really shouldnt judge all men because there are people acting like children.

[+]bluehorserunning -1 points0 points1 point 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I don't think that anyone is "judging all men" here.

[–]McFeely_Smackup 3 points4 points5 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

the interesting thing is when women really ARE 100% a "dependent", men still manage to not use that as an excuse to deliberately undermine the marriage relationship.

this "women suck at sex, but it's really men's fault" crap has been going on for generations.

[–]CurveArtistic 5 points6 points7 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I wonder how it plays out when the man provides financially though.

I make 95% of the income in my household but also work a demanding and around the clock job. She also has a solid career by most standards (makes $200k a year), but we both agree that my career takes priority.

My gf takes care of a majority of chores, but says she’s happy to do so. I am also pretty clean and cook a lot of meals for us as well. Also, I think she recognizes that I provide a lifestyle that she wouldn’t be able to afford otherwise.

I wonder if sexual desire on her end would dwindle with time solely due how she provides value to our household

[–]rahul_9735 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Just words won't help you!! Reverse the whole system then you will realise..

[–]Glum-One816[S] 3 points4 points5 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yes, have government support and all-women program.

[–]NutsLikeMelons 3 points4 points5 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

So she does chores and feels like I’m a dependent. Meanwhile, in the real world, I work and pay all the bills and she actually is my dependent. It’s all just projection.

[–]TipiTapi -1 points0 points1 point 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Read the post before answering or you will look silly.

The article is about couples who both have full time jobs.

[–]NutsLikeMelons 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I read it. Added my 2 cents. Moved on. Meh.

[–]NullIsUndefined 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Husband and Wife should be a team splitting the house work. Typically women will prefer to do stuff inside the house, and men will be climbing in the roof, mowing the land, gleaning out the gutters, repainting the wood trim, sanding the deck, etc. fixing the outdoor stuff

[–]Melohdy 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Honestly, whenever I try to help out, it's not good enough. I don't fold the clothes the way she likes, don't vacuum or sweep thoroughly,... I earn 6x more than she does and work full time, while she works part time.

[–]Mansplained-lady 3 points4 points5 points 3 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Wrong. I am the homemaker in our relationship and neither I perceive my spouse nor he himself, as dependent. He is the head of household and he has the final word. Also I love him and want him satisfied, my love includes serving him, cooking for him, doing things for him. This is no oppression, this is love.

[–]ZeldaVelveeta -1 points0 points1 point 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

That is YOUR love. It is anecdotal. Not standard issue. Not right or wrong, just not every woman wants to clean up after grown men

[–]Mansplained-lady 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

That reminds me of my childhood friend who was getting angry from picking up after her boyfriend. Too many fights then she moved out and broke up. To her, she took it very lightly. To me, I took it deep.

[–]ZeldaVelveeta -1 points0 points1 point 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Not only that but not everyone does Master/submissive or whatever relationships, you're kinda niche

[–]ExcellentIncident205 3 points4 points5 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Then why don't they leave instead of complaining?

[–]oneknocka 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

What the study doesn’t state or address is if sexual desire then increases if partners then subsequently do more of the household chores. I’ve read that it doesn’t

[–]Hype-And-Style 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

They have a complex where they feel like relationships should be anything other than 50/50 in favor of them.

[–]ThatGIRLkimT 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It depends on the situation. I hope every couple is helping each other in all aspects.

[–]Catch-the-Rabbit 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I would think it's less about a dependent and more about being annoyed by laziness.

[–]flowingwisdom13 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I am sorry but hasn’t it been proven that the opposite holds true. Couples with traditional perspective report more sexual satisfaction and more sex than those that abide by modern norms.

[–]mikesteane 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If you have this sort of problem at home, get your wife a copy of Laura Doyle's "The Surrendered Wife." It is a woman explaining, in womanspeak, why if you want everything done your way, you should do it yourself. It says such things as "When you complain that your husband doesn't help out in the kitchen, ask yourself how you behaved the last time he tried."

[–]Moldyshroom 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

Damned if you do and damned if you don't. I could be mowing and working on projects inside and outside the house all day, but the wife will come home and start hollering because the dishes weren't done or the floors weren't cleaned. Shit like this promotes attitudes towards what chores men should be helping but never points out stuff ladies don't do. Yard work, carpentry, landscaping, fix it projects, the entire honey do list.

Flip the narrative. When men do more household labor, they see their wife as a dependent, their desire for sex dwindles.... Oh now I see why my wife wants me to do everything... FML

[–]TipiTapi 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Bro just divorce.

You deserve happyness. You deserve to be glad your partner came home. Cmon.

[+]DocRocksPhDont -2 points-1 points0 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Did you all forget that on myost modern relationships men and women are both working? You guys are surprised someone doesn't want to fuck the guy who expects you both to work and she do all the chores and cleaning, or worse the guys who are dependent on the wife who don't work or clean? This isn't that hard to understand

[–]SleeplessSeaTac 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yep, wife says that's what screwed up our marriage. Either that or she's sleeping with the neighbor, IDK. She was adamant that one of us stay at home with the kids and homeschool, but since I made 2x her salary, she retired to take care of the kids. Pretty much stopped sleeping with me that month and never came back to bed.

Kids are great, so I'm grateful for that at least, but if you want sex AND a stay at home wife, put 50% of your pay to a nanny, maid, and cook, and send the wife back to work.

[–]_PersistentRumor 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Most women secretly "settle" for their partner, and will use any excuse possible to get out of sex.

[–]Cybralisk 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Women are so delusional about what kind of partner they think they deserve they think getting a guy on their level is settling, that's why the modern dating market is so fucked today.

[–]Icy-Start5536 -3 points-2 points-1 points 3 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

All my girlfriends complain that my house is dirty, then make some supposedly witty joke and put out as usual 🙄

[+]Rubatose 5 points6 points7 points 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Uhh, if you bring a new girlfriend to your house and it's dirty, and she thinks you're a slob, it's because you are.

[–]w_cruice -3 points-2 points-1 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

If she still puts out, who cares what she SAYS? Even SHE doesn't. ..

[–]Icy-Start5536 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yep, overall that's what happens. EVERY girlfriend I have makes more mess and I certainly don't expect them to clean. It's ok, I can still hire a cleaner, I prefer them putting out. I really don't see why I'm getting downvoted.

If I'll ever go cohabitating I'll done cook dinner and do the dishes and she can cook lunch and do the dishes. Things like that, but overall men should do traditionally masculine chores and women traditionally female chores. If you take the 'equality' bait her sex spigot will close soon enough. You wanna do chores? Go and chop the wood, fix the car that kind of stuff

[–]Icy-Start5536 -2 points-1 points0 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

She doesn't mind and we'll go upstairs to fuck anyways

[–]Nixthebitx -1 points0 points1 point 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That's not what the study was about at all. This is from the ARCHIVES OF SEXUAL BEHAVIOR division for scientific psychological study publications.

This study focused on narrowing the field of research conducted into women's low-sex drive MEDICAL diagnoses and treatment. Don't let a media article twist a scientific publication's motive for the work done here, nor for the women who sought out treatment for these issues that conducted in this.

A lot of women struggle with this, and they go to the doctor for help so they can have that desire back for and with their husband again.. they don't walk into those doors telling the doctor it was their husband's fault.. so don't let some twat cheapen what was studied here, or intended overall, because they have their own narrative to show when they don't understand a thing that was aimed for here.

-- FROM THE INTRODUCTION: "In a recent review, Mark and Lasslo (2018) outline individual (e.g., cognitive focus, stress), interpersonal (e.g., relationship length and relationship satisfaction), and societal (e.g., restrictive sexual attitudes and egalitarianism) factors associated with low desire.

They note that “…the research to specifically examine the societal influences into maintaining sexual desire in long-term relationships has been limited… This is an area with ample future research opportunities, and we encourage researchers to explore this as a priority” (p. 575)."

That last bit is what this is for. It's one of many to come.

Read the published study, not the reddit post, not the online article about the study. archives of sexual behavior ORIGINAL PAPER - Gender Inequities in Household Labor Predict Lower Sexual Desire in Women Partnered with Men

[+]DocRocksPhDont -2 points-1 points0 points 3 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Did you read this? In most cases now both the man and woman work. The issue arises when the man doesn't pull his equal weight with home and work, making them totally dependent and the relationship unbalanced

If either a woman or a man didn't want to work and also didn't want to cook and clean, I would think they were a deadbeat and not want to sleep with them regardless of their gender. This study really isn't that surprising.

[–]mikesteane 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

A big factor is that she usually wants the man to spend as much time as she does getting things the way she wants them.

[+]DocRocksPhDont -4 points-3 points-2 points 3 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Who hurt you? You're projecting some shit here and it isn't realistic to the average

[–]mikesteane 3 points4 points5 points 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Pathetic passive-aggressive personal attack that has nothing to do with the issue.

[+]DocRocksPhDont -2 points-1 points0 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Just pointing out that your example is so specific and not representative of the average

[–]mikesteane 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

That's passive aggression for you: "I was only...". Grow up.

[+]DocRocksPhDont -3 points-2 points-1 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You're just mad that I'm right. You're overly specific comment isn't realistic or relevant.

And, Nah, I'm good.

[+]Icy-Start5536 -7 points-6 points-5 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

All my girlfriends complain that my house is dirty, then make some supposedly witty jokes and put out as usual 🙄

[+]Icy-Start5536 -6 points-5 points-4 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

All my girlfriends complain that my house is dirty, then make some supposedly witty joke and put out as usual 🙄

[+]Rubatose -10 points-9 points-8 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yes. This is literally biological. I'm sorry, but most women want a provider and they want security. And there's nothing wrong with that. Unless, of course, those are things you can't do. Then you're supposed to find a woman who doesn't mind doing more work instead of complaining as if every single woman in the world is supposed to mentally alter themselves to be more fitting for you personally.

[–]JewelFyrefox -2 points-1 points0 points 3 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

As a woman myself, I hate household labor with a passion. But, I know it must be done in order for there to be some kind of organization. Even if everything's not sparkling, I don't care, as long as it isn't disgusting, dangerous, or unlivable.

That's why I would want us to share the chores. Take turns doing dishes, have our own half of the laundry, one mop, other sweep, etc, etc. It's only fair if we both do half at the very least.

The only acception to this is if one does not have a job at the moment, unless it's for medical reasons or reasons such as someone close just died, then there is no reason why they shouldn't clean.

[–]A_British_Villain -2 points-1 points0 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

A woman can be your mother, or your lover, not both.

If you need to be babied then call your mom.

Around your gf or wife you are expected to be the solid ground she can rely on.

[–]Commercial_Ad_4522 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I feel like that should go both ways to a degree aside from people struggling with physical or mental health needs who should be given extra help. Neither women nor man should be sitting at home doing nothing while the other works and does the chores and or takes care of children unless there are extenuating circumstances. I do deffiantly see women as expecting more than they are willing to give in that regard, however I think it’s fair for either gender to feel dissatisfied if they are putting in much more work than is equitable.

[–]Death_Stranding69 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

When a man do more work and labor, they see their partner as a gold digger and their liveability dwindles.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter