https://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/cxx746/trp_and_the_pipeline_to_the_farright_an/

Now that we have established that TRP has strong ties to the far-right and neoreactionaryism, (most RPillers in the comments didn't even deny it) I think we should discuss the patriarchy or "traditional gender roles" that many Red Pillers fetishize.

I have noticed that many Red Pillers imply that things used to be balanced in the past. (unlike now that we supposedly live in a "gynocracy") They imply that men had their roles, women had their roles and everyone was happy.

I disagree with this position and think that traditional gender roles inherently favor men over women. Lets debunk some myths.

1) Women didn't have to work.

Bullshit. Working-class women always had to work. The difference is that they could not be economically autonomous in most cases because the man was expected to be the head of the household. This is why we had things like women not being able to get credit cards without their husbands' approval.

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/apr/13/working-women-stay-at-home-wives-myths

https://www.womansday.com/life/real-women/a55991/no-women-allowed/

Being economically dependent is cancer and doesn't allow you to be your own person in many cases.

2) Both male and female sexuality were restricted equally

Yea, only that female promiscuity was punished way more harshly than male promiscuity. Female sexuality was restricted way more. This is even more obvious in Islamic countries, but even in the West, male sexuality and male promiscuity were much more socially acceptable. You can find 100 reasons for that, but it doesn't make it not unfair. The idiots even used to believe that female sexual desire is a symptom of hysteria.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Female_hysteria

3) Being protected means you're not oppressed.

Some seem to imply that women were not oppressed because they were protected from various harsh realities of life. But that's bullshit. Being protected doesn't mean you're not oppressed. If a master acts kindly towards his slave, it doesn't mean that the slave is not enslaved. If a kidnapper takes care of his victim when it gets sick, it doesn't mean that the kidnapper is any less of a kidnapper. If you ask any modern woman if they would prefer to lose their rights if it meant that they would be "protected", 90% of them would say NO.

So I want to ask the neoreactonary crowd: Why should women accept the patriarchy? What's in it for them? What do they win by it? Why shouldn't they fight it at every chance as it is unfair to them?