AWALT, for those who aren't aware, is the dismissive (redpill) notion that all women are like that, meaning any behaviour a woman does is due to her gender (an oversimplification, IMO,

As a straight male, I have had 7 girlfriends, thus far (am now 35), which represents less than 1% of all the women in the world (~~ 3.6 billion). To conclude all women are like that requires the following assumptions:

  1. all the girls I know share charecteristics x, y, and z.
  2. It follows from 1, that all the girls my friends have dated also share x, y, and z.
  3. Now that I have a good-enough sample size, I conclude that all women have x,y, and z and (this is key) these are merely due to the fact that they are women.

The only characteristics I've found common among all the women I've dated are surface characteristics (e.g. no facial hair, breasts, warm hands).

Emotional/behavioural characteristics, which is what I understand AWALT to imply, are not common throughout even my 7-person sample set.

In conclusion, AWALT exists only because of an invalid assumption. Since this so-called truth is part of the foundation upon which the whole redpill philosophy stands, it's invalid and therefore the entire redpill is, also, invalid.