Women complain about unwanted attention from men. Men complain about the amount of energy they have to spend before a woman wants sex with them. You'd say sexbots would provide at least part of the solution for both sexes. But some feminists protest against their production because men 'can have sex with them and treat them like objects without any will'. Well, dear feminists, that is because they are objects and have no will, so men can have sex with them without harming anybody and spare real living women that way.

Distrustful as I am, I think the problem lies somewhere else.

For men who just want sex and nothing else, spending a few hundred bucks on a sexbot costs less energy than all the things he generally has to do to please a woman. So when many men purchase sexbots, this gives women less power over them. Women who up until now just manipulated men with their bodies then have to bring in something else. Even for men who wouldn't especially fancy a robot (like me, though I'm not sure I'd never use one) the dating market would change. This is an outright threat to the current, silent female dominance on that market, and elsewhere as a result of that. Attention from men may not always be pleasant, but if they don't need you anymore, or only need you when you're as nice to them as vice versa, that may be even less pleasant.

(This is not about demonizing women. It is about an unequal situation that many women, sometimes maybe even unconsciously, use, as most people would if they were in a comparable situation, and that might change with the omnipresence of sexbots.)

https://futurism.com/the-byte/law-experts-sex-robots