So feminists say that you need proof in court of law, but not court of public opinion. So they are free to "believe women" just based on her. But problem is, feminists want us to "believe women" as well. They shame us for not believing women.

But when it comes to false accusations, they say they would need concrete proof that that the accusation was false. Even a lack of conviction is not proof for them. They need absolute proof.

In actual criminal court, you need to prove accusation and false accusation "beyond reasonable doubt". In civil court you need preponderance of evidence for both.

But if feminists say that they would believe women just based on their words, we should be allowed to believe that the woman is lying just based on words of the accused man. Since they don't need proof, we shouldnt also need proof.

We should be able to socially exclude women who we think are lying, we should be allowed to terminate their employment if we think they are lying etc. Basically if we believe they are lying they should face the same fate as the man.

Feminists demonized Johnny depp based on just words of Amber Heard, we should be allowed to demonize Amber Heard just based on words on Johnny depp. But feminists freaked out when we dared to do what they so casually did to so many men in their metoo era witch hunt.