Guardian Newspaper glamourises the Female Dating Strategy subreddit as an "empowering lifestyle for dating standards of women"

irrelevantmoniker · 2021-08-11T09:24:56+00:00

'Dating standards'

Their standards are fucking impossible, they want respected confident rich extravagant supermodel practitioners of tantric sex mojo who simultaneously lack the self respect to expect anything in return from her and who are so spineless they put up with her every misbehaviour.

This is a self contradictory definition, the individuals in question are a logical impossibility.

But you know what. FDS just keep on FDSing, because it might serve as a red flag to anyone who realizes the woman subscribes there. Because its a flag that the woman has the amorality of a sea mine and the cold dead eyes of a shark.

costyksimpatic · 2021-08-11T10:23:44+00:00

What? That subreddit is legit sexist.

RedSnappper · 2021-08-11T09:18:46+00:00

"FDS comes down hard against pornography, kink and the sex-positive politics of “liberal feminism” – all of which the group’s moderators believe are harmful to women."

Wait, FDS is...against feminism?

Just searched 'feminism' within FDS, and yes, they are quite clearly against feminism.

Diligent-Education64 · 2021-08-11T10:24:10+00:00

FDS is the home to sex negative feminists. No wonder they choose single women. This is where getting a dollar for dollar extraction from men is all about raising the price of their greatest asset. It's a marketing ploy for a body part. I don't why you guys read that site but I'm sure why the Guardian loves them.

Nic_M9252 · 2021-08-11T10:55:17+00:00

The Guardian is a terrible newspaper so I'm not surprised they are writing this dribble.

Saying that, reading the article the advice described sounds terrible. If women make the decision to be mis-led then fair enough, however it does sound like they want the advantages of a equal society without the disadvantages. (By disadvantages for example I mean splitting the bill)

D0D · 2021-08-11T09:34:30+00:00

Those "high-value men" are the one who choose in the end and no female (or strategy) has the power to change that. There are too many women wanting "high-value men" and too few "high-value men". It's a story old as humanity...

General-Ad9818 · 2021-08-11T12:35:33+00:00

I’m honestly not surprise that the guardian is praising and glamorizing FDS, no wonder men aren’t getting married these days and there’s a birth rate decline, women want a high value men yet they themselves bring nothing to the table except for their looks and presence.

The FDS is not empowering as it’s basically a sub where women encourage their delusions and their dating standards sound really unrealistic.

drtapp39 · 2021-08-11T11:42:48+00:00

That sub is trash and the fact that anyone would defend it and the vitriol coming out of it just shows the severe double standards of the media

UltimaterializerX · 2021-08-11T10:36:44+00:00

Obligatory reminder: https://subredditstats.com/subreddit-user-overlaps/femaledatingstrategy

None of those women are actually dating or desirable.

manicraccoon · 2021-08-11T09:50:26+00:00

It would have been a great thing if it was an r/atetheonion moment. Sadly FDS is not satire. sigh

Lorenz99 · 2021-08-11T11:46:55+00:00

This is why men refuse to marry and birth rates in western countries are in extreme decline.

jnbolen403 · 2021-08-11T13:50:11+00:00

34 yo woman living in a family friend's garage on a folding bed starts dating after 10 years needs man to save her. Sets up some dating strategies of meeting a man to SNARE.

Men are financial and social markers for women to capture and keep because they can not achieve the financial and social heights by themselves. FDS is developed using obscure and unspoken behaviors to determine suitability for ensnarement. Honest forthright expectations are not discussed. Yeah MGTOW is a thing for a reason.

Terror-Error · 2021-08-11T11:31:20+00:00

And just like that I'm boycotting the guardian.

Yumyumyum9995 · 2021-08-11T12:27:22+00:00

I just got banned from FDS because I was reading post in this men’s rights group. Saying my views ( getting each sides views and opinions) don’t align with their views.

What kinda BS is that.

Apprehensive-Drop819 · 2021-08-11T14:04:20+00:00

What sucks the most about this whole fantasy they are pushing, "that all women are entitled to a 666 Chad/Tyrone", is that eventually these chicks are going to have to settle.

I'd hate to be the average joe that settles with one of these girls that thinks she is entitled to a male 666 supermodel.

Imperium_Britannia · 2021-08-11T14:24:59+00:00

Guardian is radical left garbage.

Mr-X1 · 2021-08-11T12:30:30+00:00

"Funny" how the more overt misandry, body-shaming etc are not mentioned in that article. Hypocritical bitches.

sidirhfbrh · 2021-08-11T16:10:15+00:00

You know what’s hilarious - if you were to flip the genders on this article and re-write it word-for-word, it would be lambasted as hate speech and manipulative. It’s impossible to take this shit seriously anymore.

Physical-Pie748 · 2021-08-11T16:45:54+00:00

if men say dont be fat its "oh who hurt you, you incel". but if women say they want 6feet tall men, then its called being empowered and having preferences. double standards, as always

Drayenn · 2021-08-11T18:43:14+00:00

I dont get how a high value man would ever want to date one of these women. Imagine dating an angry men hating who wants to be paid for every date. Im looking for a life partner who will be my equal while we support each other, not a hate filled gold digger.

thewindburner · 2021-08-11T13:39:55+00:00

I found this on another sub recently, it shows how to share links to the guardian without sending traffic to them (and giving them revenue).

The sites a bit political but it might be a useful bookmark!

https://theguardian.fivefilters.org/how-to-share/

thatgirlanya · 2021-08-11T15:49:23+00:00

Long term Relationships should NEVER be transactionary like these women want. That’s how you end up hollow inside when you’re 70 and have an existential crisis because you’ve never felt love. Seeing other people as investments and as objects will net you nothing but misery and emptiness in the long run. How pathetic.

TheChocolateBarsGuy · 2021-08-11T12:11:44+00:00

What do expect from mainstream media ?

EricAllonde · 2021-08-11T15:46:46+00:00

Feminists are so drenched in misandry, so saturated with it, that they see the man-hating in FDS as entirely normal, respectable and unremarkable.

Feminism is a hate cult.

deusdeorum · 2021-08-11T15:04:29+00:00

What a shocker, that the guardian would not only publish an article referencing FDS but also endorse FDS with a positive spin.

Please do not link to sites like this, they are garbage and don't deserve a boost in site traffic.

reddut_gang · 2021-08-11T15:16:59+00:00

I don't care about their standards. The hate needs to stop though.

AquaPiranha · 2021-08-11T15:46:05+00:00

They don’t even try to hide the double standards against men anymore.

JazzPhobic · 2021-08-11T17:07:19+00:00

Shocking, but not surprising. The Guardian and The Sun are UKs most blatantly sexist newspapers. The Sun is the one that called Johnny Depp a wifebeater.

That a sexist newspaper promotes reddits most sexist sub is not surprising.

Vista_Seagrape · 2021-08-11T17:17:27+00:00

An actual hate group being promoted by a major media source. Meanwhile, advocating for homeless men and men's health get's you branded a fascist/misogynist/lunatic. It's crazy. If men were the gender with power, why could that happen?

HEMIfan17 · 2021-08-11T17:20:06+00:00

They tell women that if a man follows any sort of fitness / Onlyfans model on Instagram to immediately dump him. They also give a list of media or celebrities material a man consumes to be considered a red flag. One of them was Bill Burr. Really? Bill Burr?! If a woman was to really follow that "handbook" she's going to be single for a long ass time.

amightyusername · 2021-08-11T18:31:06+00:00

The overlap of FDS posters with related subreddits is as shown below. "The scores listed are "probability multipliers", so a score of 2 means that users of the inputted subreddit are twice as likely to post and comment on that score=2 subreddit. A score of 1 means that users of the inputted subreddit are no more likely to frequent that score=1 subreddit than the average reddit user."

Prob. multiplier	Subreddit
29.51	purplepilldebate
26.18	datingoverthirty
25.75	askwomenover30
24.97	datingoverforty
20.45	thegirlsurvivalguide
20.23	cptsd
19.75	survivinginfidelity
16.34	childfree

https://subredditstats.com/subreddit-user-overlaps/femaledatingstrategy

Reddit is in a discriminatory and hateful campaign against white people and men. Join alternative platforms that don't discriminate against people for their inherent physical features; Ruqqus is one of such platforms: Ruqqus is an open-source platform for online communities, free of censorship and moderator abuse by design.

IronJohnMRA · 2021-08-11T12:35:45+00:00

I won't even read it. It's not worth my time. Neither is that sub.

RusticSurge10 · 2021-08-11T20:00:39+00:00

I haven't seen many posts about dating.

most of the posts I see is just them attacking men.

and they talk about how women are good and men are dumb and sexist for defending their rights and shit.

but you know what truly pisses me off?

yea. them thinking we live to impress women.

like when we want to gain some muscles most of those people are like "but you are ugly tho. those muscles won't help you get women"

or "you are just acting like you are oppressed. how on earth you think that'll increase your chances of getting women?"

they think they are so important and special that they think we are trying to "get pussy" (yea they talk about objectifying women and how thats toxic and they objectify themselves. they do the same thing with men.) with every single one of our actions.

and you know what? ahs (against hate subreddits) doesn't give a fuck about that. no one talks about that sub.

reddit thinks its not 'hate' if its against men.

you knew against mens rights exist? I still haven't seen any ahs about it.

awkwardtheturtle still has her account. reporting doesn't work. do we have to riot again?

like tell me, what the fuck are we supposed to do here? and they still think we arent oppressed? we just get banned for even commenting in this sub. if you defend mensrights on ahs you get banned. there is an account dedicated to hating men. makes posts/comments to get this sub and other mens subs banned. they are targeting us. if we try to stop them, we get banned. they are spreading misinformation on ahs. if you go through the comment section of posts about mens rights you'll get cancer. don't even try to argue.

the sub against mens rights literally call us racists. for defending mens rights??? wtf??? like they focus on posts with 12 upvotes. they talk about deleted posts. they make alt accounts to post sexist shit here and before the mods can ban it they post about it then they (probably dlete it) think we'll fall for that? some of them quote some shit from this sub and don't even give links to those posts/comments.

reddit doesn't do shit.

we are fucked, and I can't believe it. this platform is getting worse than tiktok cuz of all these sexist mods?

belon94 · 2021-08-11T14:45:30+00:00

Who is the simp in the picture with her?

Rifter0876 · 2021-08-11T14:50:13+00:00

I haven't clicked a guardian link in years, don't intend to start now. They are not a real news outlet imo.

thunderstorm-nigg · 2021-08-11T15:08:06+00:00

No fuckin way

ManofGod1000 · 2021-08-11T15:43:14+00:00

Yeah, I read that article and this women speaks about all the things she wanted and the things she wanted from a man. However, I did not see anything about what she was bringing to the table. Yeah, FDS is a joke as it is.

Lui_Le_Diamond · 2021-08-11T16:14:49+00:00

And people wonder why I don't take The Gaurdian seriously

BoogersAndSugar · 2021-08-11T18:27:38+00:00

HAHAHA! That sub is a redpill factory, more effective than a million manosphere subs, and not only does reddit keep it up, but the media advertises it. They're doing OUR job for us :). And do they genuinely, seriously not know this??

OctaviaPinfold · 2021-08-11T19:13:08+00:00

Ah, yes, strategic dating that consists of treating men as ATM and hating everything else about them, often more at the same time, constantly being paranoid about men, even in long-lasting marriages, and calling that the ideal relationship. They even extend this to the son's of women, you have to be paranoid about them as well because boys are born evil in their eyes. How empowering to tell women that they can't get love, satisfaction, appreciation, respect, anything mutual, only money and they should value only that, and abandon anybody who thinks differently, no matter the circumstances. They're also not allowed to have feelings, express themselves, seek advise elsewhere, question anything, porn is forbidden, anything outside of what they say is normal sexuality is evil, and don't even dare to talk about your partner about sex, that's just blasphemy... what a great lifestyle that is, the absolute peak of humanity.

Or as normal people would say, a cult, or at least as close to it as you can get online.

millenialfalcon-_- · 2021-08-11T19:34:12+00:00

That sub is toxic af.i stumbled upon it a few years ago.fuck that sub and those cat hoarders

Sudden-Juggernaut · 2021-08-12T01:00:40+00:00

they ban mgtow but refuse to ban fds... what more proof do you need

mikesteane · 2021-08-11T22:30:14+00:00

[permanently deleted]

AutoModerator · 2021-08-11T09:12:50+00:00

[permanently deleted]

ftmsnotrare · 2021-08-11T16:39:59+00:00

Cuz fds is made by secret freemason transgenders

Kilikandzer · 2021-08-11T19:23:26+00:00

That's so disrespectful. She would probably also treat her husband like a business partner.

EstablishmentFunTime · 2021-08-11T22:31:32+00:00

Ok, went into that subreddit! It’s just a fucking sexist hellhole

iamjesus1991 · 2021-08-12T13:02:21+00:00

FDS users = Left over women.

StudentOfTheTruth0 · 2021-08-13T10:36:54+00:00

The Guardian newspaper is the most tragic case and the best proof of "anything feminists touch turns into shit".

The Guardian was actually a very good newspaper until 2015. Among other, Glenn Greenwald worked there, who exposed George W Bush's illegal and unconstitutional warrantless wiretapping scheme, as revealed by Edward Snowden.

And then "The Change" came. The former male editor in chief was removed and replaced by a female, and feminist, one. Instantly, the until then good newspaper become an extremely low quality left-wing, feminist and woke propaganda organ. The best journalists, including Greenwald, left (Greenwald co-founded The Intercept shortly after) and an abominably low quality but very aggressive version of feminist propaganda took over. Very shortly the paper started making losses and since then it is going through one round of job cuts after another (every time hundreds of jobs are cut). Its circulation is perennially shrinking.

Biased and lies-laced feminist editorial and opinion articles are the norm, just as the one quoted here, heaping praise on the criminally bad FDS. Just another day at that newspaper.

When a feminist touches anything, even something really good, she destroys it. The fate of The Guardian newspaper is just another repetition of the same sad saga.

jacksleepshere · 2021-08-11T19:37:56+00:00

Post on r/menslib

Title	Guardian Newspaper glamourises the Female Dating Strategy subreddit as an "empowering lifestyle for dating standards of women"
Author	Roary93
Upvotes	587
Comments	122
Date	August 11, 2021 9:05 AM UTC (4 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/p29cmr/guardian_newspaper_glamourises_the_female_dating/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/guardian-newspaper-glamourises-the-female-dating.1058760 https://theredarchive.com/post/1058760

Comments