TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

    • /r/AllPillDebate
    • /r/AlreadyRed
    • /r/altTRP
    • /r/AntiFeminists
    • /r/askFDS
    • /r/askMRP
    • /r/askRPC
    • /r/becomeaman
    • /r/BlackPillScience
    • /r/Chadfish
    • /r/Divorce_Men
    • /r/EverydayMisandry
    • /r/ExRedPill
    • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
    • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
    • /r/GEOTRP
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • /r/MalePsychology
    • /r/Male_Studies
    • /r/MenSupportMen
    • /r/MGTOW2
    • /r/MuslimRedPill
    • /r/newTRP
    • /r/PussyPass
    • /r/PussyPassDenied
    • /r/RedPillBooks
    • /r/RedPillParenting
    • /r/RedPillWives
    • /r/RedPillWomen
    • /r/RedPillWorkplace
    • /r/RPChristians
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/ThankTRP
    • /r/TheRedPillStories
    • /r/trpGAME
    • /r/TRPOffTopic
    • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
    • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

    • Artful Prudence
    • A Voice for Men
    • Alpha Game
    • Black Label Logic
    • Caleb Jones
    • Captain Capitalism
    • Corporate Machiavelli
    • Days of Game
    • Deep Strength
    • Dicipres
    • Donal Graeme
    • Female Misogynist
    • Free Northerner
    • Gaming My Wife
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • In Mala Fide
    • KillToParty
    • Kill Your Inner Loser
    • Krauser PUA
    • LaidNYC
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • NO MA'AM
    • Omega Virgin Revolt
    • Pook's Mill
    • Random Xpat Rantings
    • Red Pill Theory
    • Red Pill Wifery
    • RedPillDad
    • RedPillDoctor
    • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
    • Sigma Frame
    • The Feminine Woman
    • The Futurist
    • The Masculine Principle
    • The Modern Man
    • The New Modern Man
    • The Obsidian Files
    • The Power Moves
    • The Private Man
    • The Red Pill Room
    • The Red Quest
    • The Rules Revisited
    • The Spearhead
    • Troy Francis
    • Wintery Knight
    • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

Number of 'lonely, single' men is on the rise, says psychologist OP: More male hate from the Daily Mail. Another nail in the coffin for women trying to date.

furchfur

August 15, 2022
623 upvotes
/r/MensRights
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-11112791/Number-lonely-single-men-rise-says-psychologist.html
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title Number of 'lonely, single' men is on the rise, says psychologist OP: More male hate from the Daily Mail. Another nail in the coffin for women trying to date.
Author

furchfur

Upvotes 623
Comments 221
Date August 15, 2022 4:45 PM UTC
(3 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/wp4f7j/number_of_lonely_single_men_is_on_the_rise_says/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/number-of-lonely-single-men-is-on-the-rise-says.1127932
https://theredarchive.com/post/1127932
Top posts by furchfur

UK: Innocent student wrongly accused of rape calls for anonymity for sex assault defendants until they are found guilty.

17408 upvotes
December 18, 2017
/r/MensRights

Thousands of dads are left in shock as DIY paternity tests soar. Up to 30,000 tests are being performed every year, says Alphabiolabs. In the UK about 750,000 babies are born every year. Feminists want the test to be illegal without the written consent of the mother.

4746 upvotes
January 13, 2019
/r/MensRights

Male rape survivors tell of their battle to have their voices heard after being told ‘men are the attackers, women are the victims’

4394 upvotes
April 14, 2017
/r/MensRights

16yo female 'prodigy' developer's app was actually written by a male programmer.

4210 upvotes
February 6, 2018
/r/PussyPassDenied

Mother-of-two, 40, falsely branded a neighbour a sex offender because he 'made too much noise building a guinea pig hutch in his garden'. It seems for many women if they do not get their way they make a false sex allegation knowing a man is not protected by the law.

3937 upvotes
March 4, 2019
/r/MensRights

Female British YouTube vlogger accuses Dublin hotel of bullying her after it refused her request to stay there for free and posted their scathing response saying she 'lacked dignity' online

3871 upvotes
January 18, 2018
/r/PussyPassDenied

Nearly 500 men and boys are freed from 'house of torture' Islamic boarding school where they were chained up, raped by staff and starved 'in the name of teaching them the Koran' in Nigeria. OP: We will see how much media coverage this gets.

3825 upvotes
September 27, 2019
/r/MensRights

Teenager, 18, who lied that ex-boyfriend drugged and raped her after he refused to rekindle their romance is convicted of wasting police time

3747 upvotes
May 29, 2018
/r/MensRights

Comments

[–]kirewes 139 points140 points141 points 3 years ago (20 children) | Copy Link

Women want emotionally available men yet whenever I try to be emotionally available or i see other men try to be emotionally available we are ridiculed and called weak.

It's a lose-lose situation for us the f*** are we supposed to do? We tell women to be straightforward with us. We tell society to be straightforward with us.

It's not.

[–]copeharderhun 106 points107 points108 points 3 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link

Women want emotionally available men yet

Here's the trick - they absolutely do not and this whole push has basically been the world's (or at least Western society's) biggest shit test

Women don't want "emotionally available men". They never did. They want men who will listen to THEIR problems and MAYBE complain about trivial things that don't matter. But that's about it. They do NOT want a man to actually unload anything serious on them.

This is first just understood anecdotally via shared experience. What men are women going home from the club with? Is it soft sensitive guys? No. What male characters in film do women find most attractive? Guys who share their deepest emotions? The success of Fifty Shades of Gray and literally every other female oriented romance novel says no. Shit I myself used to be very emotionally available. Guess how many women I was getting that way? Zero. They would not see someone like me as relationship material. Now I am the opposite I really am not emotional outside of anger at the many injustices of the world, and don't really care much at all about what people think of me. Suddenly it's easy as fuck to get women.

But we don't need to resort to anecdotes. Even though we all know it to be true we cannot use them as sole evidence. So we can go to science instead. Well the science is very clear - women do NOT biologically find crying men attractive - quite the opposite they find it disgusting. Similarly women rate men with Dark Triad personalities significantly higher in terms of attractiveness than sensitive and emotionally available men. The evidence is very clear - women biologically do not find emotionally available men attractive.

Indeed all the evidence used to support women finding emotional men attractive share the same fatal flaw - they are based on surveys of women where they simply answer questions. These are useless as women will respond what they either think is true or what they want to believe is true (after all society has been going on about "emotionally available men being attractive"), not what actually is true. When we look at the actual hard science - i.e. tests which objectively analyze and compare women's reactions to different types of men as opposed subjective tests like asking them to fill in surveys - we get one clear result. That is that women do NOT find emotionally available men attractive.

Of course this is known to any man with the slightest bit of life experience but having the data to back it up helps a lot.

This begs the question - why do women claim they want emotionally available men when they actually don't?

It's very simple - they want to BELIEVE they do. For the past couple of decades feminists have been going on about toxic masculinity this and that, that men's emotional unavailability is the source of all the world's evils etc etc. The problem is though that there is a very good reason men act this way - because that is what women find attractive and what women reward men for doing. This however presents a conundrum, because it means that women are at least partially at fault for men acting this way and thus they themselves share responsibility for the "ills" caused by "toxic masculinity" (what a bullshit term btw). That would of course be a big no go in feminist circles - admitting that women can do wrong - so they just lie to themselves and tell themselves that they totally want emotionally available men.

[–]totallyRebb 22 points23 points24 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I used to buy into the whole "women are more empathic" thing for a long time, at least when growing up.

But now i'm starting to think the opposite - i think women are actually less empathic. And if the science you mention is true, then they also actively select for psychopathic traits.

Suddenly everything that goes on in the world does not seem so strange anymore - it may simply be the natural result.

[–]Relativity_Star10538 17 points18 points19 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

They save their empathy for themselves.

[–]WomenRAllowd2bRacist 12 points13 points14 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

https://i.imgur.com/hINu6yn.png

[–]cormacdre 37 points38 points39 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I was wondering why such a well written uncomfortable truth bomb was being upvoted on reddit, til I realized what sub I was in. Almost got excited for a second that people were listening to reason and evidence and not freaking out because it conflicted with their belief system.

[–]thebochman 9 points10 points11 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I see post after post of women in r/dating complaining that men unburden themselves with unresolved issues of past trauma yet they complain that they want emotionally available men. The hypocrisy knows no bounds.

[–]KennaRhys 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Emotionally available isn't the same thing as being your trauma dumping ground. You're confusing the two.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This is disingenuous and you know it. Classic I want my cake and I also want to eat it too.

[–]Silentpoolman 7 points8 points9 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Welp I'm not changing. They're the ones who suck.

[–]Effective_Alfalfa360 6 points7 points8 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Science shows that men's attraction to a woman lowers when she is crying. This is not something unique to women. Men typically don't find crying attractive either. The difference is that men are expected to be comforting during this time even though nobody comforts them when they're sad. But women aren't expected to do shit when a man is upset. They usually just get all weirded out by it, as if men don't have emotions too. In a good relationship, the woman will comfort the man through his bad times just like he would in her bad times. Also, in a good relationship, a man may not know all the right things to say to the woman when she's upset, but he will be willing to listen to the women's problems if she listens to his.

The problem I see is the women who go into a relationship demanding certain things from their partner and offering nothing in return. Those women are often PRAISED.

If a man were to do that, he would be shit on. That's why a lot of men end up listening to a women's problems even if she doesn't listen to his. Because if she doesn't give a shit about him, she's praised for it. But the second he returns that energy that she was giving him the whole relationship, HES the bad guy.

Men don't act entitled in a relationship because they know they will be labeled as a shitty partner. They will be with a woman through the good and the bad. However, these men are often labeled as shitty anyways the second they do something the woman doesn't like, even if what she did to him was worse.

Women act entitled because they know they will be praised for it. They will leave the man as soon as they see something they don't like. They only want the good moments. They only want the things they want without regards to the other person. They will whine about how all men suck without stopping to think that maybe their expectations were just way too high.

Note: I'm not talking about all men and women, just specifically the type that are mentioned in the comment above.

I would say to wait for the right person. You'll have to weed through all the entitled women and women who just don't value you have feelings. But you'll eventually find the right person. Don't settle for someone who treats you terribly. Those women don't deserve partners.

[–]btbamcolors 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Super interesting study, but it’s worth noting that the average age of participants was 19.4. It’s common wisdom that women learn to better select quality long-term men as they get older. Unfortunately, a lot of them get knocked up once or twice before that change in perspective.

[–]kayne2000 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Nailed it.

[–]Frege23 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Amen!

[–]Relativity_Star10538 20 points21 points22 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

And they do not want men who talk as much as they do! Here's what they want:

Men who are emotionally available, but not too emotional. Men who are emotional only when they read women's minds and know when women want them to be emotional but only for that short period of time. And that's almost always to console and validate women.

Men who communicate, but not too much. But never talk over the women or interrupt them! Men who talk only when they read women's minds and know when women want them to talk but only for that short period of time. And that's almost always to agree with women and console them and say things like "I know, you try so hard" and "I know you've had a hard day" and answer any and all questions when asked. And always watch your TONE.

Do more than this and receive citizenship to the Friend Zone and become a downgraded wimp. Do less than this and receive Toxic Masculinity classification and become "abusive." Especially if you don't watch your TONE.

[–]401kisfun 6 points7 points8 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The problem with this article is that it Is not showing women’s instant reaction, when such behavior is expressed by the man.

[–]ChinaShopBull 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Women want emotionally available men the same way I want to know the price of a car before I decide to buy it.

[–]Pr8ng1 points 3 years ago [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link

sux for u my girl loves me 💯💯💯💯💯 get ya money up

[–]kirewes 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

So your suggestion is I get my money up? Is that what works for you because if that's the reason why your girls with you right now I got to tell you man she doesn't love you.

[–]vanguard1099 0 points1 point2 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I hear you! Its very contradictory and confusing as hell.

[–]Face_Puzzleheaded 161 points162 points163 points 3 years ago (36 children) | Copy Link

So let me get this straight. There are a few million more women than the number of men in pretty much most developed countries where women aren’t aborted. And yet, more men are single compared to women. So how many women are dating the same man?

[–]SudetenNachkomme 137 points138 points139 points 3 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link

WINNER WINNER!! Hypergamy knows no bounds. Women will always share a man they believe is high value enough.

[–]AchtzehnVonSchwefel 8 points9 points10 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Every Qajar and Ottoman king ever:

And in recent years, for instance, Muhammad bin-ladder

[+]jacksmith7071 -56 points-55 points-54 points 3 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

So what? Men will always date a hotter woman if they can. Fundamentally AMALT: All Men Are Like That. I just don't get this obsessing over something we all do. We as men are just jealous that we can't do the same, but we'd definitely do the same if we had the SMV.

[–]Temporary_Spend_3111 22 points23 points24 points 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Are you suggesting all men would practice polygamy?

[+]jacksmith7071 -6 points-5 points-4 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I said what I said bro. Stip grasping at straws.

[–]WomenRAllowd2bRacist 3 points4 points5 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

So what? Men will always date a hotter woman if they can.

https://i.imgur.com/HaJocKF.png

vs

https://i.imgur.com/2M566Xc.png

[+]jacksmith7071 -6 points-5 points-4 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You some kind of autist? You prove my point.

[–]AchtzehnVonSchwefel 18 points19 points20 points 3 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

I see the white knight a-riding

I see simping on the way

I see, self-loathing and blamin'

I see bad times today...

[–]jacksmith7071 -3 points-2 points-1 points 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Nah you're just triggered. Facts don't care about your feelings. You're like the fuck$@%# Marxists, but of ass. You hate the rich until you're rich. In the same.position as women, we'd all do the same. Get over it.

[–]AchtzehnVonSchwefel 4 points5 points6 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Counterpoint:

Am volcel

And being rich isn't a good explanation for exploitation

[–]jacksmith7071 -1 points0 points1 point 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Abundance and picking the ripest fruit is human nature. Get over it You'd d the same if you weren't an incel

[–]AchtzehnVonSchwefel 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I assure you, I would not.

I actively talk to women. They do seem to enjoy my company and talking points.

But sex before marriage is Haram. And being overly greedy is heavily discouraged.

[–]narfywoogles 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Did you really just try to “no you” AWALT? lol

[–]pennywise1235 29 points30 points31 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah that’s some strange new age math right there

[–]pappo4ever 22 points23 points24 points 3 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

So how many women are dating the same man?

I saw a statistic that about 50% of men under 25 dont have any sex, while only 5% of women under 25 dont have any sex.

Basically most young women fuck married guys, and/or their bosses.

[–]dope_star 12 points13 points14 points 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

80/20 rule explanes this. College women would rather share an alpha then lock down a beta.

[+]redhornet919 -8 points-7 points-6 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

You don’t know what the 80/20 rule is do you….

[–]dope_star 15 points16 points17 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

80% of the women are going after only the top 20% of the men.

[–]pappo4ever 12 points13 points14 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Also known as the Pareto rule, it works in many things in nature, reproduction of mammals, distribution of trees, etc.

[–]dope_star 22 points23 points24 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Those stats are usually all men and women, not dating age men and women. Since men die younger then women all those old ladies are throwing the numbers off.

"The men to women ratio is 103 for the group aged 15–64 and 81.8 for those over 65. The world has more women than men aged above 50. In the age group 60-64 years, there are five fewer men per 100 women. Women outnumber men by a ratio of 2-to-1 in the age group 90-94 years and 4-to-1 for centenarians."

https://www.google.com/url?q=https://m.statisticstimes.com/demographics/world-sex-ratio.php&sa=U&ved=2ahUKEwiguq6T-sn5AhVCkmoFHby_APgQFXoECAYQAg&usg=AOvVaw2gIrzRJZwjkiucgBZ3svIF

[+]2137gangsterr -7 points-6 points-5 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

The men to women ratio is 103 for the group aged 15–64 and 81.8 for those over 65

Do you even read

[–]dope_star 15 points16 points17 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

103 means more men then women until after age 50. Do you read?

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points9 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

And yet, more men are single compared to women. So how many women are dating the same man?

Something something women excuse multiple partners and cheating here like no other. I am actually yet to run into a "poly" man.

[–]StudentOfTheTruth1 9 points10 points11 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

He didn't say that more men than women are single, only that more men are single than in earlier eras. I think the truth is that while there are more single men than before but even more single women than before and also more single women than single men. This Matos guy is a feminist propagandist and doesn't add the part that is inconvenient for women to hear.

I also think "single" and "lonely" are not necessarily the same things, as women always form groups and aren't necessarily lonely when single. Unlike men, for whom the feminists have shut down their male-only organizations that they had before (like gentlemen's clubs), so now men are lonely when they are single. But a propagandist like this Matos guy only say the bits that serve to make men look bad.

[–]OK_G4D4E-P01NT421 points 3 years ago [recovered] (3 children) | Copy Link

Men die sooner than women. There are a decent more amount of men than women in prime dating age ranges.

[–]Lendari 16 points17 points18 points 3 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

Okay, so Feminists love to add up "all births and deaths across all ages and geographic locales" and make fucked up statistics based on a few historically outlying countries that don't practice Western values. Confounding statistics by rolling everything into two huge buckets (IE: all men vs. all women) is a common practice for people looking to confuse everyone (*).

Putting that aside, to truly understand the science of what is termed as gender surplus, you have to look at the statistics sliced by the two confounding variables - geographic region and age range. What you will find is some really clear trends.

​

  1. The more Westernized a region is, the more likely it is to have a female surplus.
  2. The further you get from wars in terms of age demographics, the more likely you are to find a male surplus.
  3. The further you get from a highly urbanized areas, the more likely you are to find a male surplus.

So, applying these rules. If you live in North Korea, you're obviously fucked. If you're a millennial living in Alaska, you're going to find more eager men than women. If you're a boomer living in New York, you're going to find the opposite. A lot of eager women. If you're not in any of those extreme situations, the gender surplus is likely not the primary variable in your dating life because it's going to be within a few points of 50/50 overall.

You're probably going to have to look at other things. Like the admission rates for your college's freshman class (which are often female biased) or the gender balance of your workplace of field of employment. A male nurse is going to have a lot more dating opportunities than a male engineer. These things are not controlled by gender surplus at all, but can have a massive impact on the available dating pool for you as an individual.

In general, individual outcomes are not ruled by statistics.

​

(*) FUN FACT: This same statistics trick is where the 75 cents to a dollar "wage gap" cited by Obama and Hillary comes from. They relied on debunked studies that added add up all income into two buckets. Then ignored confounding variables like the fact that the male bucket included more total hours worked and more consecutive years of experience in a single field to "prove" that women were discriminated against.

[–]kayne2000 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Beautifully said

[–]MixxMaster 4 points5 points6 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

80/20

[–]CzechoslovakianJesus 4 points5 points6 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

There are more women only in the 40+ range because of men dying early; more boys are born than girls.

[–]Dry-Ad2372 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Women are also polyamaris by nature. They share men with other women, for example, it's like 10 men with 20 women. Women also have plenty of sex with different men. If we really want to go back to nature. Women were designed to let the best sperm win. So it's nothing how you have imagined. The ones who lose out of everything are the men who are the left overs.

[–]M-3X 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This statement may be true when taking into account all age groups.

Otherwise i would say the difference is not even 1% more in favor of women.

They just got extremely selective. They or it's nature's intention. 🤣

[–]aries0413 186 points187 points188 points 3 years ago (31 children) | Copy Link

Yeah why can all men just be over 6ft make over 6 figures and have over a 6" c*ck. I mean its so simple.

[–][deleted] 165 points166 points167 points 3 years ago (22 children) | Copy Link

America is going to be fucking wild in like 10 years. Women are getting so over picky dating is kind of starting to die. There is going to be a massive slew of unhappy, single childless women in their 30's who do nothing but work (like guys have historically) and they are going to see what men see... it can fucking suck, a lot. They are going to be miserable. Most men have spent so much time alone as a kid, shunned and all that where they can deal with being alone better just by experience. Women are very social in general, many are much much happier with a partner, friends, vibrant social lives, which is perfectly fine, but they are getting in their own way here more than anything and they are creating a future they are REALLY going to hate.

It's like muckbanging, yeah, fun now, hahaha look at me and all that... but it's going to rubber band and catch up to you, and you're going to be fucking miserable down the road. Women and how they view men now is just like that. They think it's fun to wield this power of blaming men, saying men are not good enough, women are great and so on, but it's not consequence free, there is a reason the 30+ unhappy woman numbers are doing nothing but going up, not down.

[–]pappo4ever 29 points30 points31 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

We are back to stone-age dating: most men are single and women are mostly in harems. Western society is already a harem society, its just that is often hidden from the public view, but most women fuck men that have 2 or 3 other women. They prefer that life.

[–]Relativity_Star10538 5 points6 points7 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Let's not forget, they love the drama of it. Those emotional highs and lows are catnip to them. A stable relationship is boring.

[–]aries0413 88 points89 points90 points 3 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

The fact is it is easier for a man to be alone than a woman. After a while a man will suck it up and just move on, naturally go MGTOW.

[–]myzlzxghtoefbjuypu1 points 3 years ago [recovered] (4 children) | Copy Link

The fact is that an average woman has better chances to seduce another woman than an average guy. Bisexual women have usually very low standards towards the same sex.

[–]YetAnotherCommenter 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Bisexual women have usually very low standards towards the same sex.

Any proof of that? Because in my experience, as a bi dude, bi women are just as picky as straight women... which is why most bi women prefer to date men (its easier than dating women).

[–]myzlzxghtoefbjuypu1 points 3 years ago [recovered] (2 children) | Copy Link

I mean usually bisexual women don't require very attractive women to have sex with. They don't look at height and often don't care if a girl is chubby o skinny.

I base this information from talking to them and posts in related subreddits. So, it's not any scientific proof of course.

[–]YetAnotherCommenter 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I mean usually bisexual women don't require very attractive women to have sex with. They don't look at height and often don't care if a girl is chubby o skinny.

I base this information from talking to them and posts in related subreddits. So, it's not any scientific proof of course.

Well your experiences are certainly very different to mine. Bi women are just as picky as straight ones. Although it might be the case that bi women are just as picky as straight women about men but less picky when it comes to other women.

However if that were the case you'd expect most bi women to end up with other women. In reality, most bi women end up with men. As do most bi men, by the way.

Which means either bi men are gay-and-in-denial and bi women are straight-and-just-experimenting, or that men in general are easier to date than women.

As a bi man myself, I think the latter alternative is more likely to be acccurate.

Again, this is on the basis of my own experience.

[–]Bigb5wm 4 points5 points6 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Men grew up alone in most cases so it comes naturally

[+]FH-7497 -40 points-39 points-38 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Couldn’t you have just said naturally GTOW? It’s like saying PIN number but even worse lol just joshing mate

[+][deleted] -47 points-46 points-45 points 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Women do the same thing. There's no data to support any claim that specific genders handle loneliness better. As far as I know

[–][deleted] 30 points31 points32 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Here you go: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0146167285111006

While it’s not clear which gender has better coping mechanisms when it comes to loneliness, it is clear that each gender has a distinctive coping style. Men tend to focus on attaining a group of acquaintances to combat loneliness, while women tend to focus on one-on-one relationships.

So women literally can't handle it just like men and seek relationships to cure it... which would indicate men actually handle being lonely, partnerless which is the topic here and women feel the need to find someone to fill the void. There is actually a lot of research on this, you could have just ya know.. looked.

They all say the same thing, they don't really know who handles it better, but they do know women tend to need other people more than men do... which common sense would indicate men handle it better since they are not trying to fill a void like women do. Women seek a relationship, men seek company. The topic at hand here is dating, aka, one-on-one relationships. Women need partners for the most part, men need groups for the most part. Taking away relationships has a much greater effect on women than men.

[+][deleted] -28 points-27 points-26 points 3 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

You contradict yourself In your own comment. And the article you posted shows that they both "can't handle it" and cope in their own way. It proves nothing.

[–]khaste 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

cope

[–]valspare 32 points33 points34 points 3 years ago* (5 children) | Copy Link

There is going to be a massive slew of unhappy, single childless women in their 30's who do nothing but work

I have done some observational research. Meaning, I've just read what's published and been online looking at things.

For those that are curious. Take a look at (not a plug for any of them) some of the Sperm Donor sites. Just-a-baby, coparent match, Voy, known donor registry, co-parents, and several of the sperm banks, and other message boards, and you'll start to see this trend happening. Plus you'll also see the rise of Natural Insemination (aka real sex for those that didn't know), donors and the women (who for their own reasons) select this option.

Over the last few years, I have been watching a slow implosion of women's dreams. Equality is really starting to catch up on these woman.

A classic is the woman who thinks that the man she thinks she's capable of attracting is because she makes 6 figures.

What they don't get is the man's point of view. If you're a 2 (woman), and you make 6 figures, that doesn't generally matter for a guy, you're still a 2 and that isn't going to get better with age and/or child(ren).

What I have noticed that generally makes guys more attractive to women: How interacts with animals/kids and how they interact with him, he has his own child(ren), a decently nice car, better if its a 4 door family style car, decently attractive, well dressed, Grooming (including body, face, head hair) is VERY important, the bigger the wallet the better, can make her laugh, intelligent, traveled, cultured, more physically in shape the better, confidence is very sexy (not letting her push you around included [being an asshole isn't]), Among several things I've noticed.

For the guys under about 35 y/o, hang in there, It'll get better for your chances in a few year. For the guy's older then about 35, you may have some things to work on, but you know what to do/look for.

I suggest you know their (women's) psychological games and throw it right back in their face. When you know you're worth, you can play the game to your advantage.

[–]Khidorahian 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Ah, i hope i throw my chances down the drain by indulging in large grand tourers.

[–]valspare 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

I personally have an Xterra, great for the mountains and skiing/snowboarding and fun in the snow (4x4), but sucks on fuel.

I have a Mazda Protege5 that I like to do a lil bit of Zoom Zoom. Its a blast to drive and great on gas.

And An Alfa Romeo Spider. Best when the day is nice, the top is down, and I'm just out for a drive. Good on fuel, outstanding acceleration from a lil 2.0 Italian Hemi engine.

There is No mini van in my future. Nor a giant SUV.

My dream garage has a Subie WRX of some sort, a '74 Alfa Romeo GTV, a Lancia O37 (Stradale), would love a Lancia Stratos (could settle for a kit car), and a '93 Lacia Delta Integrale

Almost imported an Integrale in '97. Well before import information was available online. And before I learned about import restrictions

[–]Khidorahian 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

That's a nice garage, hopefully when I'm out there on the road, I'll have a garage as well spread as yours.

[–]valspare 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Thanks. But some of that is 'win the lottery' garage.

I have a bit more modest budget garage. That and I can do a decent amount of auto maintenance myself.

[–]Khidorahian 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Mhm, i meant both of em haha

[–]throwaway3569387340 17 points18 points19 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I easily meet all three of those prerequisites and I still don't see the point of dating. Women are completely toxic today.

If I need companionship I'll rent it. Otherwise, screw this whole circus.

[–]StudentOfTheTruth1 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

666

It has a symbolic meaning, though.

[–]roskatili 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Close enough:

Talking to men was eye-opening. Men and women were asked, if they [had] any deal-breakers for going on a second date, what would those be? And men named three. If she's cute enough ... warm and kind ... and interesting enough to talk to, she gets a second date. Men are not going, "Am I going to marry her?" Men are like, "Do I want to spend another two hours with her?" Women named 300 things that would be deal-breakers for a second date. We're talking a second date, another two hours with the person.

[–]HosstaLaVista 5 points6 points7 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Man I'm 2/3 of these and it still isn't happening for me. The scene just sucks now so I promise, you aren't missing out on anything just because you don't meet their stupid "standards."

[–]jacksmith7071 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Also you: Swipes left on Precious.

[+]Cbd_7ohm -10 points-9 points-8 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Read your comment before posting.

[–]kevin32 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Reminds me of this profile from rWhereAreAllTheGoodMen.

[–]Duchat 56 points57 points58 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Article says partnered men are happier. Who are the "un-partnered" men? Divorced, never get to see their kids, living in a dump while paying a mortgage on a house for the kids, ex-wife, and her deadbeat boyfriend.

[–]BalloonPilotDude 90 points91 points92 points 3 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

This has been posted before but that line about a ‘skills gap’.

It’s amazing how many arguments, complaints, and criticisms of men (in and out of marriage and no matter their history, intelligence or level of achievement) boil down to: ‘Improve yourself, you are not working hard enough.’

[–]Albino478 44 points45 points46 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Its funny even how they expect you to carry the whole relationship on your back. Its supposed to be a two-way road: cars(in this case, effort) go bo ways. Yet, some Feminazis seem to think that the woman providing barely any emotional support is too much. This world is run by clown with an IQ of 1

[–]AchtzehnVonSchwefel 5 points6 points7 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

On a unicycle up in flames and trying to do juggling with a bunch of hand grenades.

[–]totallyRebb 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

I mean, emotionally supporting EACH OTHER in a relationship ?

That's just crazy right ?

Yet you read so often how feminists complain about "being the therapist for the man".

Yeah well .. "therapists" didn't exist for most of humanity's history. So yes, how about supporting each other emotionally ? What's bad or wrong about that ? I would almost say, it's how it's fucking supposed to be, when both parties have at least a modicum of empathy / compassion for each other.

If they actually ( gasp ) care about each other.

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah....man up and carry your fair share of the emotional labour!

[–]jacksmith7071 -2 points-1 points0 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

What's the alternative? That's the only thing you can do, unless you're talking about forced monogamy like Jordan Peterson does.

[–][deleted] 109 points110 points111 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Women are the primary victims once again. When will these men think of someone other than themselves?

[–]Wrathful_Spirit_666 39 points40 points41 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Men being at fault again, how typical.

[–]Legal_pharmacist 31 points32 points33 points 3 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

I’m married and lonely. Might as well be single at this point

[–]AyowhatsgoodG 11 points12 points13 points 3 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

Do what’s best for you, brother. Life is too short.

[–]Legal_pharmacist 5 points6 points7 points 3 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

I have a two year old daughter and if I move back home (in another state) Wife will get full custody. May have to get a side chick until I figure out the legal aspects of divorce

[–]AyowhatsgoodG 13 points14 points15 points 3 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Be very careful with that side chick stuff though, I would 100% advise against it. Also if she finds out about it and has proof, she could easily use it against you to claim full custody as well. From what i’ve heard, cheating is always a bad look when it comes to those child custody situations.

[–]Legal_pharmacist 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Haven’t gotten laid in a month but I guess I’ll be patient. It’s no way to live my 20’s but you’re absolutely right

[–]pappo4ever 4 points5 points6 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Welcome to married life. TBH is just a question of time until your wife go away taking it all with your daughter, if you are not getting laid in months, remember, your wife likely is, so start preparing everything for when that moment arrives. If it dont arrive, all the better, but be prepared.

[–]Legal_pharmacist 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

She’s overly religious and just always had a low sex drive, was a virgin when I married her so only found out later. But yes it is just a matter of time and I plan on getting out now before I start working since I recently graduated.

[–]AyowhatsgoodG 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Is this the only issue or does she hate affection in general??

[–]Legal_pharmacist 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Her love language is definitely not physical touch I know that. She expresses love by acts of service and buying gifts just not any kind of physical affection. Makes me fee emotionally detached and that cycle just pushes us farther away from each other

[–]Relativity_Star10538 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I was that way in both of my marriages. Both women love bombed the hell out of me, couldn't wait to be my wife, pushed for marriage, then devalued and neglected me after I married them. What's the point? All I got was added stress, aggravation, and expense. Never again.

[–]Legal_pharmacist 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Literally. She was all over me when we were dating and engaged. Less than a year later we married and she was “tired” on the first night 🤦🏻‍♂️it’s not every day you find a hot 21 year old virgin in todays world so I definitely rushed into it

[–]the-lone-squid 96 points97 points98 points 3 years ago (22 children) | Copy Link

men are typically healthier and happier when partnered

I was absolutely miserable in my last two relationshits

Single men are more likely to be unemployed

Yea, funny how I was able to retire at 41 as a man who was never married.

[–]p3ngwin 17 points18 points19 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Single men are more likely to be unemployed

funny how that happens with gender quotas displacing men.....

[–]the-lone-squid 5 points6 points7 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Well you can still go work construction..

Gee, i wonder why men aren’t bothering

[–]AbysmalDescent 8 points9 points10 points 3 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

It's almost like being judged so strictly on your income, and effectively being told that they are nothing but a walking wallet, can have a detrimental effect on men's mental health. What incentive do men have to make more money when they know that it won't change the way women treat them as individuals, and only changes the way women value them as financial/success objects. And what is the real incentive for men to work harder and longer hours, when they can already support themselves with very little and don't really want to support ungrateful and entitled women?

[–][deleted] 29 points30 points31 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Same. I don't like dating, at all. Women tend to add way too much stress and nonsense with partners. I try to live my life simple, easy, stress free. When I date that gets uprooted so quickly and replaced with petty stuff.

Women also treat you WAY better when not dating, American woman are horrible to partners and treat them so much worse than a friend.

I remember years ago when I dated this girl and showed up to a mini get together with a bunch of people a bit late, like 5-7 minutes. She would not stop giving me shit about it telling me how rude I was, mean, disrespectful, she didn't wanna talk to me and so on. Meanwhile her friend who she was waiting on, the whole reason we were there, showed up like 30 minutes after me and she gave him absolutely zero crap and was thrilled to see him. For some reason I, the person who was supposed to be special, got the short end of the stick every time compared to everyone else. And it's been like that with every single American woman I have ever dated. The BF is second fiddle and they use this excuse of "higher expectations" to justify being an asshole. Just kind of amazing to me, American women are so much worse to the people they claim to care about the most.

Men will go so far out of their way to make women happy and comfortable, and those are the people women ghost and ignore the most, the man actually trying to make her happy and meet in the middle with her, and make sacrifices.

[–]cosmoharley1 26 points27 points28 points 3 years ago (16 children) | Copy Link

Notice the terms, "typically" and "more likely", not "always." You as an individual may not be represented, but they are using statistics.

[–]the-lone-squid 7 points8 points9 points 3 years ago (15 children) | Copy Link

Funny thing about statistics of that often include divorced men or men who went through the family courts

[–]cosmoharley1 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link

Your point being what exactly?

[–]the-lone-squid 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link

That statistics can me misleading

[+]cosmoharley1 -7 points-6 points-5 points 3 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link

So divorced men shouldn't be included in studies? Are they not still male? Im not getting your point here

[–]RedPill_Hispanic 6 points7 points8 points 3 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

A divorced man is more likely to be depressed (after being thru the divorce grinder) than a man who was never married. It is important because some people like to use those same studies to push marriage but if it were known that divorced men are more unhappy than it wouldn't help for the pro-marriage arguement.

[+]cosmoharley1 -8 points-7 points-6 points 3 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Where's your source that the cause of divorced men depression rates come from the process of divorce and not being single in of itself.

[–]RedPill_Hispanic 5 points6 points7 points 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Men kill themselves 3-5x more than women do. You have access to Google, don't you?

[+]cosmoharley1 -6 points-5 points-4 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I never said they didn't? I asked for your proof that the process of divorce made men more unhappy than those who were never married in the first place. You are making the claims, you should be able to back them up.

[–]paul9854 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Where's your source that the cause of divorced men depression rates come from the process of divorce and not being single in of itself.

When you separate single men into cohorts of divorced men and never-married men, and measure their happiness and quality of life separately, the divorced cohort always fares worse than the never-married cohort. Since there are no other significant attributes that differentiate the two groups, it's likely that the single status (divorced versus never-married) is responsible for the divergence in the results.

Studies suggest men are happier if they never get married.

[–]cosmoharley1 -2 points-1 points0 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

First off, you linked a YouTube video... Not exactly a good source. However your video itself had a source from a random website, which did have sources. Looking through them brought me mostly to articles written by the author of the first. The others only supported the argument in passing, as in the articles stating that single men have more friends than married men, only for the article linked to say that men in general don't have many friends. Or stating that men specifically are less lonely when single, only to use a source that talks about men and women, which is a nuisance which started this whole conversation.

Long story short, that source was just bad science designed to convince people who don't look under the surface.

[–]Gpda0074 3 points4 points5 points 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

They're included in "single" men which warps that category. A single man who never married is not even close to the same state as a man who is divorced and single. First guy is probably okay at the least, happy at best. Second dude is probably miserable at least, okay at best. This warps the "happy" category of single men to the lower end. The two groups should be kept different and would be in most studies. But I guarantee that they don't differentiate between the two groups because the single, never married man reports far greater feelings of happiness than the divorced single man does.

[+]cosmoharley1 -7 points-6 points-5 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Have any proof of that, besides "dude trust me"?

[–]Gpda0074 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Yeah, the study doesn't have it as a category and government statistics do not differentiate either. Pretty sure that's proof.

[–]cosmoharley1 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If you're pretty sure, it's not proof. Also, I was referring to example of the 2 men you gave. Any source that what you said is true?

[–]rsa1x 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Single men are more likely to be unemployed because women don't want broke men, not because having a relationship magically gives you a dream job

[–][deleted] 27 points28 points29 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I like how it's presents the issue as "men are single and lonely, cuz women don't wanna partner with them" how stupid? How about that men wanna be single and left alone?

Why is a single man "lonely" but a single woman empowered? A lot of men I know.. myself included are what the society considers "high value" and single.....BY CHOICE.. fuck this article..

[–]p3ngwin 11 points12 points13 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Men said to be lonelier than ever as they struggle to meet standards of women

That's a funny way to say "women struggle to have reasonable standards, leaving them lonely".

[–]hifi3xx 31 points32 points33 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Women bash and hate men so men leave them a lone and now men are lonely. Hmm wonder why

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points8 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I have never been happier since my divorce. I don't date, don't try and impress sloots. Just focus on me. If i get real hard up, i hire an escort.

[–]rocket717_ 7 points8 points9 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

There's a solution to all this:

Poor = Get more money

Ugly = Get more money

Boring = Get more money

[–]ISmellLikeBlackTea 7 points8 points9 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

More lonely, depressed men, women most influenced.

[–]63daddy 32 points33 points34 points 3 years ago* (3 children) | Copy Link

I think his conclusion making is very flawed. He looked at dating apps and found there were more men than women, so concluded there must be a lot of lonely men.

Off the top of my hand I can think of several things wrong with this:

  1. Not all dating occurs through dating apps. He did not include in person dating and did not include dating websites, which have far more women.

  2. Many profiles on dating apps are bots, zombie accounts, inactive users, scammers, etc. Also, not all people are equally serious. Using the number of members is very misleading.

  3. Just because there’s more guys than women on many apps, doesn’t mean their are more guys overall. It could simply be guys try more apps.

  4. Even if a guy doesn’t find someone he’s interested in, doesn’t mean he’s lonely. Lots of guys look at the dating scene and purposely decide to stay single.

This article is a great example of why psychology shouldn’t be considered science. His conclusions aren’t based on an unbiased, random sampling study. He simply looked at some data from a very small subset of dating data and drew conclusions the data does not prove.

[–][deleted] 10 points11 points12 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I have a PhD education and I can tell you that most empirical research is not about "proving" anything. That's where the public gets it wrong with regard to how science really works.

[–]ToothProfessional408 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

It is not even scientific article. Sure, this is bullshit. Cognitive psychology with neuroimaging proofs - what is (almost) real science.

[–]63daddy 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It’s an agenda supported with cherry picked information, but of course being published in a major publication by a professional, many readers will incorrectly assume the conclusions are objective and evidence based, which they are not.

[–]khaste 6 points7 points8 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Nearly every comment ive seen from women on this issue still dont get it.

Most men arent acting entitled to sex or relationships. There is a difference between wanting and needing. the latter is entitlement.

​

Its ok to have standards, but its also ok for everyone to have their say about their dating issues/ struggles, and not just put them down with some ridiculous insult like - "shut up virgin, incel etc".

​

Apparently its sexist to even critique a whole sex/ gender now, especially when said gender/ sex can do no wrong supposedly. World is crazy

[–]SecondEldenLord 5 points6 points7 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

"Women with higher dating standards look for partners who are are 'emotionally available, good communicators, and share similar values" - such bs, if it was true, they would've found such a man many many years ago, but no, modern women prefer to sleep around in their 20s with chad while complaining there are no good men, when in reality the real good men are invisible to them because of their egenetics.

[–]AyowhatsgoodG 9 points10 points11 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

This article is hilarious to me because you can tell that it is extremely biased towards men. It’s suggesting that male loneliness is on the rise because women are simply “raising their dating standards and are seeking out healthier relationship and partners”. I personally never struggled with attracting women whatsoever, but "male loneliness” is so much more complex than "women are raising their standards so now men are lonely”.

Many married men feel lonely too, a lot of men have retreated to the online world and rather play video games, watch porn or tv shows. We need more strong brotherhoods and open up news paths for men to make friends with each other.

Edit: The study linked in the article also shows that the rates of unpaired men and women are nearly identical. 39% Men and 36% Women.

[–]TheBowlofBeans 3 points4 points5 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm in a long term relationship and feel extremely lonely.

I think a big contributing factor is that with social media and interconnectedness, men are no longer seen as valuable members in smaller communities. The world is too big and complex for any one man to feel like they are needed. All we're considered good for is supporting a wife's spending habits

[–]RatDontPanic 5 points6 points7 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

What nail? Women of today are less interested in marriage than ever.

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Here's what's left out of the conclusion. The men also must be loaded and good-looking too. Actually, those characteristics are more important than what's in the survey. But those aren't things social scientists ask. That means that there will be a lot of women who will be just as lonely as a lot of men, because loaded, good-looking men are of course going to pick the hottest women when its time to settle down. They'll just turn to sweets and carbs when they are no longer hookup material - at shock time they'll be even more unattractive than the men they rejected.

[–]Bigb5wm 5 points6 points7 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That article has some contradictions. 62 per cent of men make up dating app. Then later says with so many options women and men are more selective. The first part explains why men are single. The rest of the article is making things up without examples or even a women who is interviewed

[–]beleidigtewurst 23 points24 points25 points 3 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Could someone elaborate how men could be lonelier than women please?

Is it because women can install that swiping app, swipe in some direction, get sex, then regret it as the sexy dude could not care less about her?

[–]Throwawayingaccount 15 points16 points17 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

That's part of it.

There's also the fact that hormonal birth control on average lowers sex drive, so there's less push for companionship.

[–]beleidigtewurst -2 points-1 points0 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

hormonal birth control on average lowers sex drive

Could you poke me with an article please.

[–]domnulsta 18 points19 points20 points 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Women can do that and get rid of their sexual tension if needed. Rarely can men do that on demand. Besides that, usually when a woman approaches you and tries to interact with you, you are a lot less likely to find that creepy or uncomfortable, unlike the same situation with a man. When a woman has an issue and poses it onoine, she will almost immediatly receive attention, support and care to solve it. A man in the same situation faces the risk to not be taken seriously. I think there are more things as well, but I think the above are enough.

[–]beleidigtewurst 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Women can do that and get rid of their sexual tension if needed.

There are, you know, alternative ways to get rid of sexual tension.

And it's quite an adventure to just get an orgasm, you know.

When a woman has an issue and poses it onoine, she will almost immediatly receive attention,

That is a different subject, unless you mean that since a woman gets some online responses, she doesn't feel lonely any more.

[–]domnulsta 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

If you want to do it with a partner and you aren't looking for a hooker, there really aren't.

I'm not saying it isn't harder to get an orgasm, but you have a lot more chances to try to have one, unlike a man.

It is still a step above men, isn't it? Getting some online responses is still better than being afraid to post your issues online because there will be people coming at you saying stuff from you being entitled to you not being a man or whatever. And it's not onpy restricted to that, women get overall a lot more support from family, friends and society in general. Women receive the most mental support in this world, despite men's mental health being worse than women's.

[–]beleidigtewurst -2 points-1 points0 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If you want to do it with a partner

Both genders are pretty capable of achieving orgasms (men in particular, a sizable chunk of women is frigid) without partners.

The argument made was that people need to simply get rid of sexual tension.

women get overall a lot more support from family, friends and society in general

Yes. It doesn't make them "not lonely".

[–]Imissyourgirlfriend2 10 points11 points12 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I plan to soon be single and "lonely". I can't fucking wait. To go to bed when I want, to not have to entertain someone every second when I'm home, to not have her ask "are you going to take me out with all this overtime bonus you're working?", to never have her just spring "oh, my mom is coming to stay with us for a month, you cool with that?", to never be told I'm a racist, to never be told I'm a misogynist for saying men suffer to, to be free.

I can't wait to be single again and "lonely".

MGTOW

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Even broke ass (welfare, non-working, non skilled, disabled) women are pickier. When the state jumps into the competition to take care of a woman's basics needs even the lowest class of women somehow figure they're 'strong and independent' and get pickier.

The game is rigged. It's always been aimed at getting men to work more/harder. The more/harder we work, the more money goes to subsidize women. It's a nasty cycle and it was bound to hit a ceiling at some point.

Men are cost/benefit calculators. The benefit must be better than the cost. This is the profit motive. We know that you never get more energy out than you put in but the energy you put in has to be worth the return in some way.

Where is the incentive for men? Sex is free, even if it's just porn. But hell, if I'd rather jerk off than put in the effort to 'date' then maybe the problem isn't me - the juice ain't worth the squeeze. ha, gross.

Hypergamy floats. It's always going up. Always demanding more.

Compare that to the job market. Wages have been stagnant since the 70's but yet we produce more. The promise was always "if we (the company) makes more, you make more" but we're catching on. I believed that for so long and I busted my ass in my 20's and 30's. When I'd expect more pay I'd either be replaced or the boss would pull out a list of shit to knock my ego down so I'd shut up and go away. So, now I pretty much do the bare minimum to get by. I've learned my lesson.

Look at the labour shortages. Companies say "people don't wanna work" and people are going "yeah, fuck you, it's not worth it." Who's right? Who's tired of being guilted and shamed into doing more for less? Show me the money!

Where are the women willing to subsidize a man's lifestyle? Where are the women willing to 'date down'?

Women are so fucking confused about how economics works.

Men know that our main currency was resource provision, protection and commitment. Women (being subsidized by the state) don't need our resources anymore. The state also provides protection. All men really have to offer is commitment which is pretty close to attention. So, we're withholding our attention and commitment - the women are so confused. And when women get confused they blame men. It never gets old. /s

Women know that their main currency to attract men is youth, beauty, fertility - basically sex. Now they're older, fatter, more disagreeable, have kids and they're standing there going "where are all the good men?"

Keep it up boys. Starve the system. We want them more than they want us, but they need us more than we need them. When a woman withholds sex she's applauded. Let's withhold our resources, utility and commitment/attention.

[–]SwiftStrik3 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'd say a lot of men are staring to wake up and realize how toxic women really are and have decided the juice isn't worth the squeeze. Dating is dead and women killed it.

Even if you do get into a relationship They lack accountability. You've got no emotional support. You're required to do all the work in the relationship. You can do everything right and it's still not enough. You lose certain freedom's . The list goes on and on , it's like why bother?

[–]Angryasfk 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Love the bit that single men are more likely to be unemployed and financially unstable.

Wouldn’t be that men are more likely to be single if they’re unemployed, and certainly men who’ve gone through the ringer of a divorce are more likely to be “financially unstable”.

And it seems that all these articles keep coming back to that same set of somewhat rubbery numbers that seem to select a nice age range to show that more men are single than women are: the difference is about 3%! Something that’s easily explained by women tending to “partner up” with guys a little older than them (I’ve not seen evidence that homosexuality is significantly more common in women than men).

Btw, the psychologist seems to look the part.

[–]Warder766312 6 points7 points8 points 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Meh, I’m fine with it. Already went my own way, I should be retired at 50. Contemplating just hiring a surrogate to have a child since that’s probably the cheapest and best bet now instead of getting married.

[–]RiMiFi -5 points-4 points-3 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Just adopt if you want a kid so bad. This world doesnt need more people. Your kid is just gonna have to deal with the same crap and worse

[–]duffelbagninja 10 points11 points12 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Depends on if you want to mentor or genetic legacy. Both are kids but he could want to pass on a genetic legacy that can’t be had by adoption.

Don’t get me wrong, adopting is great (I have an adopted child) but it is not what everyone wants.

[–]ImplodedPotatoSalad 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

We want OUR OWN kids, not just SOME kids.

[–]bfte2 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

What's with with these concerned journos as of late, talking about "lonely single men"?... It's like someone flipped a switch and these NPCs started going haywire.

[–]Ei44ghty 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

We should all be dating each other instead. Homies understand each other so much better anyway. let the human race dies down. I don’t see no future for humankind anymore 😂

[–]A_Good_Redditor553 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yup, the the has officially gone down hill.

So sad to see it go

[–]ThatRandomCrit 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Didn't I see this exact same article, word by word, but from another female psychologist?

[–]Bigb5wm 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That article has some contradictions. 62 per cent of men make up dating app. Then later says with so many options women and men are more selective. The first part explains why men are single. The rest of the article is making things up without examples or even a women who is interviewed

[–]Bigb5wm 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That article has some contradictions. 62 per cent of men make up dating app. Then later says with so many options women and men are more selective. The first part explains why men are single. The rest of the article is making things up without examples or even a women who is interviewed

[–]Bigb5wm 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That article has some contradictions. 62 per cent of men make up dating app. Then later says with so many options women and men are more selective. The first part explains why men are single. The rest of the article is making things up without examples or even a women who is interviewed

[–]Timely-Fisherman1062 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

LONELY? ha i say i don't need no woman in my life to be complete I'm a strong independent man. I'm alone but not lonely.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Modern Western women don't tend to make great partners either. This isn't a man v woman thing.

[–]DrewYetti 1 point2 points3 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It’s such a convenient time for raising awareness of “lonely men” when the west is in heading to an economic, financial and societal collapse. One of the things these “lonely” men don’t have to worry about is debt and guess who’s the majority demographic that are in debt? Women. So in turn, these articles in lonely men is really to gaslight men who are happily single and financially stable into believing they aren’t happy without a woman so they’ll be oblige to commit to debt ridden women as the clean up guys.

[–]soyjav 3 points4 points5 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I remember,now talking about being lonely and that stuff,about one thing Andrew Tate said,you might not like him (im kinda neutral about him)but hell he was right here:

(When talking about mens mental health)

"As a man,you cant afford to sit here and cry and say,i dont wanna go to work,i dont wanna go to the gym,because you will lose against the men who dont do that,the male world is extremely competitive,and its women who pick the winners"

"So i find It funny that a woman is sitting here telling me that men are allowed to express themselves and cry and then does are the same men they ignore when they dm them"

Edit:this without even mentioning the fact that when men in a relationship open about their feelings,some women use that against them in later arguments but then they will be like "why men dont open to us?"

[–]Strigon_7 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This was radio worthy news today at around 430pm in my country. Men are now forced to address their short comings as people as women are more financially independent apparently. I'm beginning to think the pendulums swing is almost fully in one direction, the swing back will be disturbing and uncomfortable.

[–]thepogopogo -5 points-4 points-3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The right wing Tory loving daily heil shitting on normal men, quelle surprise.

[+]nancybotwin1968 -43 points-42 points-41 points 3 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

I wish this sub focused more on legal rights, like equal parenting and no fault divorce laws. This reads as: Women have enough choice not to have to settle for a loser, while loser men are generally unhappy when single. dumb

[–]LettuceBeGrateful 13 points14 points15 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

You're categorically calling men who struggle with dating losers. dumb

[+]nancybotwin1968 -11 points-10 points-9 points 3 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

No, the article correlates something like unwilling singleness with lower quality of life. I say lower quality of life ("losers") men will have a harder time finding a mate. It is a clear cause and effect imo although I am sure there is some circular causation, I admit. Anyways, I would love to see more on this sub about things like how men can combat parental alienation and how men should navigate the family court system, things like that. Just so many woe is me cultural victimization posts, don't let that be your narrative or you'll become even more of a cuck (the wider "you" not actually you whoever u are, squints hard Lutt-Us-B-greatfull.

Maybe its matter of which came first- the cock or the cuck?

[–]ImplodedPotatoSalad 7 points8 points9 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

We will focus on what we see fit to focus on. If you dont like it, r/feminism is somewhere else....

[+]nancybotwin1968 -13 points-12 points-11 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

oh shit. my user name. lmao fuck. i forfeit.

look a heads up, its a user name on an anonymous forum. i am as likely to have a dick as u. mine is bigger, obviously.

I almost lost my kid in a divorce. i did not earn the right to parent him by whining and bitching. Suck it up, butttercup.

[–]maryhartman0001 points 3 years ago [recovered] (50 children) | Copy Link

Try being kind and honest and a good person - that goes a long way. If you run around screaming about how much you hate women, you won't get super far. No woman requires the 6/6/6, that's just ridiculous rhetoric. We are not very picky, we just want nice humans. If that is so hard, then there will continue to be more single men.

[–][deleted] 19 points20 points21 points 3 years ago (18 children) | Copy Link

Guys don't run around screaming about hating women. That is extremely taboo in society. Women, however, do go around screaming about hating men, and that is very much acceptable in society. ... Moreover, being an emotionally available man often does not go well with women today. Women say they want an emotionally available man but they don't ACTUALLY want that. They want a man to care for her when she whines and bitches about her day. That's about it.

[+]maryhartman000 -20 points-19 points-18 points 3 years ago (17 children) | Copy Link

You have to be totally shitting me. Look at this sub Reddit called men’s rights. It is a constant complaint fest 24 seven. Every time I come on here it is men complaining about how women are fucking awful. And this is only one of probably £.30 Subrunners. Are you serious? If you want to be datable, just be a nice guy. We don’t like guys who are emotionally unavailable or giga chad’s or anything like that.

[–]Wqtr100 11 points12 points13 points 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

LOL. This subreddit is nothing compared to the countless subreddits where women shit on men constantly. Women love to shit on men, and they are far more vocal about it. Go to any online forum or social media and you will see it. Not to mention the countless misandric articles in mainstream media. Women get away with being sexist and misandrist.

[+]maryhartman000 -11 points-10 points-9 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Go take a look at a sub Reddit called 2X chromosomes, people just go on there to talk about their issues or make comments about what’s going on in life, but you come here and it’s like a 24 seven news blast about some woman killing or having sex with some 16-year-old. Or men complaining about how sad and lonely they are and how evil women are. We don’t talk about any of those things at all.

[–]Wqtr100 9 points10 points11 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Do you really expect me to believe your lies? Reddit is filled with misandrists. The same goes for social media platforms. But sure, keep on denying the fact that women are far more sexist than men. Keep denying that there are countless misandrists on Reddit. After all, what else could I expect from a feminist? You are probably a misandrist too.

[–]ImplodedPotatoSalad 6 points7 points8 points 3 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link

If wome do something awful to men, by men's standards, guess what....they will get called out on that, instead of getting a "you go, gurrrl! Slay kweeen!" here.

If you want a man that is good by your standards, then you must meet HIS standards, not just give a bare minimum and deem yourself a queen of the universe to be worshipped as a god.

But you know everything better. After all, you have a vagina...no penis owner can come close to your true enlightment, lol.

Woman, example 1.

[–]maryhartman0001 points 3 years ago* [recovered] (11 children) | Copy Link

Not really you’re correct. Again we’re not the ones who are single, you are, and don’t even attempt to explain to me that Men are single by choice.

[–]ImplodedPotatoSalad 8 points9 points10 points 3 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

Lol. Because we cannot make such choice, apparently.

Gurl, you REALLY dont know much about the world you live in. But then again...r/twoxchromosomes. what to expect, but a little miss know-it-all-better?

[–]maryhartman000 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

Hey the articles written about you and how you guys are so lonely and sad, I’m just simply telling you if you got personalities and stop hating women you might be able to get a date.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points 3 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

Typical woman. Everything is the man's fault. Everything is the man's responsibility. Women are always innocent and should be worshiped and pampered like princesses. Women needn't take any responsibility for themselves. It's all on men. Men men men men men blah blah blah blah ...

[–]maryhartman0001 points 3 years ago [recovered] (7 children) | Copy Link

Strawman argument. Try again

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points 3 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Hey. The day a woman actually takes some responsibility will be the day hell freezes over. But keep crying. The movement of men choosing to stay single is massive and growing rapidly. We're not lonely. We're fed up.

[–]Reddit-person-321 8 points9 points10 points 3 years ago* (11 children) | Copy Link

No offense but I'm going to have to disagree with you on this one. It's true that many women refuse to date or be in a relationship with people who are mean but there are also plenty of other women who don't mind going for mean or mysoginstic men just like there definitely is many men out there that don't mind dating or even getting married to mean or misandric women. It all depends on how much self respect the person has or rather or not they have a personal fetish for people with cruel behavior. They could also be a bad person themselves and are just looking for someone who is like minded. Women are not a hive mind and they do not all think the exact same way you do. Just because you value niceness and kindness when looking for a partner doesn't mean every other woman does as well.

[–]maryhartman000 -2 points-1 points0 points 3 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

I see your point, but the reason so many men are single as they are undateble. Become dateable.

[–]Reddit-person-321 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago* (7 children) | Copy Link

"Dateable" is subjective. Again I have to remind you that women are NOT a hive mind. They do not all share the exact same standards of what is and isn't dateable to them. Same goes for men or anyone else really.

[–]maryhartman000 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

I didn’t say women were hive mind. A lot of women are different, clearly just like men are different. There are a lot of men who love women and don’t come on the sub bread it’s like this. There are a lot of men who are angry with women and they come on the sub bread it’s like this. There are some men who like nice and kind women, and there are some men who like mean and evil women. It’s a broad spectrum. But it appears as though there are more single men in this equation. So we have to ask ourselves why. I’m saying because they made themselves Undateable by hating women or being antisocial or something. Obviously women are not having the same problems

[–]ImplodedPotatoSalad 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Anger usuay has a real, valid reason, for men. Also, anger is good. So is hate. Both enable one to destroy opposition in a more efficient manner.

Are you an enemy? If you are not, you clearly have nothing to fear...

[–]maryhartman000 -2 points-1 points0 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I am not an enemy

[–]ImplodedPotatoSalad 3 points4 points5 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

You will not be a judge of your own case. If its good for us at any given moment, you are an enemy.

[–]Reddit-person-321 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

You said that the men who are single must only be single because they are undatable. This could only be true in a world where the man's preferred gender to date (most likely women due to the fact that straight men are the majority) all shared the exact same preferences and tastes in men and they are outside of these preferences. Hence a hive mind at least in regards to what they like and don't like in a man when it comes to romantic relationships. If you can acknowledge that neither men nor women are a hive mind and they can all have a wide variety of personal preferences then it makes no sense whatsoever to claim that men who are single must be because they are undatable.

[–]maryhartman000 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I’ve already said that not all women and not all men think the same, do you remember when I said that in the previous paragraph, you might wanna go back and read it. But here’s what the deal is, men are not datable, nobody’s dating men they’re single, so regardless of what type of woman you are on their scale that man is not datable whether it be that he is not sociable, that he has no job that he goes on some bread it’s like this and complains about women, it could be for a variety of reasons, but at the end of the day nobody regardless of how they think wants to date them.

[–]ImplodedPotatoSalad 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

What if we dont want to date, a d are still happy and acomplished? And unavailable to you on an absolute level, no matter how hard you'd want?

Thats when men are called evil, too, you know? They have sooo much and a vagina owner dont get to be i control...therefore man baaaad. What are you going to do about that mindset, strangely popular among women that cannot get what they think they are entitled to?

[–]maryhartman000 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This article did not say in anyway shape or form that men are happy that they’re single. If you can point that out then I will defer to your expertise. But I know man and most of them would like some type of girlfriend or wife. Are some of them content alone, probably some, but not as many women. More women are content alone the man

[–]Wqtr100 7 points8 points9 points 3 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

BS. Women have extremely unrealistic demands, and they are a lot shallower than men.

If women just want "nice humans" then such an article would never have been written. All the data that reveals that so many men are single and sexless would not exist.

[–]maryhartman0001 points 3 years ago* [recovered] (7 children) | Copy Link

Like what kind of demands? My demand is that you be nice, kind, loyal and loving. That doesn’t seem too extreme to me.

[–]Wqtr100 5 points6 points7 points 3 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

And there is it: the classic female bs about how they are so virtuous and only care about a man's personality. It's amazing that crap that women will say/write to avoid being labeled as shallow.

Women are a lot shallower than men, and the most important factors for women are a man's height, looks, penis size, income and social status. Those factors are far more important than a man's personality ever will be.

[–]maryhartman0001 points 3 years ago [recovered] (5 children) | Copy Link

I think I’m still laughing when you say that men are less shallower than women, I think that’s probably the funniest thing I’ve seen in my whole life. You guys watch porn look at dirty magazines you look at women dress scantily, you rape you torture you abuse you are just absolutely horrible at objectifying women in porn and in everything. You guys have such ridiculous standards. I have seen personal ads were guys literally asked for a sex slave or a maid or they have to look like they’re between 18 and 25. We’re just looking for a nice guy. You were absolutely off your rocker.

[–]Relativity_Star10538 4 points5 points6 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

There it is, lads! We're all rapists, torturers, and abusers! Can't talk about anything without being attacked.

[–]Wqtr100 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Keep on laughing then. I don't care. Women are shallower than men, and it's not my fault that you are an ignorant and batshit crazy misandrist.

[+]marshmall00 -7 points-6 points-5 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I read all of your comments and the sad part is the bar is so low for men it’s in hell and they’re some still trying to limbo under it. It’s just sad that women rather be single and/or child free than be treated as a subhuman. In 1993 it became illegal to rape your wife in all 50 states, I was in high school. In 1972 it became legal that women could have their own bank account and not have to have a man’s name and permission, that was 6yrs before I was born. This has happened in the last 50 years. My mother got married and couldn’t have a bank account without my fathers name on the account and his permission for her to use it and I was in high school when it became illegal for my father to force sexual behavior from my mother (he never did my father was an amazing man who taught us the values of a healthy relationship and great love and yes my mother was a homemaker. They just celebrated 51 yrs of marriage and living the best retirement.). Now then let’s get the down votes and arguments I don’t care because this sub is about hating women and not about mens rights.

[–]maryhartman000 -2 points-1 points0 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I didn’t read it all. Did you want to talk.

[+]marshmall00 -7 points-6 points-5 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It’s ok I was just agreed with what you said and that I come here to see how I can help with equality and such to just find majority of woman hate speech

[–]ImplodedPotatoSalad 5 points6 points7 points 3 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

And we will be happy while single, imagine that. No matter what females claim, men can be happy with no kweeen in their life, you know?

You dont really bring that much to the table, tbh.

[–]maryhartman0001 points 3 years ago [recovered] (7 children) | Copy Link

I can tell you right now that single men are probably not happy and they’re looking for a partner. I mean look at the stock photo they used for that guy he looks very upset. The article doesn’t state anything that all single men are now finally happy because they don’t have to deal with women. That is not the case. I think they need to take classes or learn how to deal with women effectively so they can be good partners and then they won’t be single any Longer

[–]ImplodedPotatoSalad 4 points5 points6 points 3 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Are you a man? If not, then well - no penis, no right to opinion on our matters.

Edit: twoxchromosomes, so, feminist troll. What to expect...

[–]maryhartman0001 points 3 years ago* [recovered] (4 children) | Copy Link

No I’m not a troll, I’m just an older female who goes to men’s rights sub Reddit. I also go to thousands of other sub Reddit’s. This one just keeps popping up in my feed. And yes I absolutely have a right to my opinion.

[–]ImplodedPotatoSalad 5 points6 points7 points 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Again - no penis, no right to opinion on matters that are inherently not yours. Unless you give us right to decide on your uterus? Whats that? You dont? Then, well,...goes both ways.

We dont exist for you. Deal with it.

[–]maryhartman0001 points 3 years ago [recovered] (2 children) | Copy Link

Oh you exist for me. Pretty much all my friends are guys my husband is a guy my friends are mostly men, I would have to say that men are pretty much very deeply in my life, but I can promise you right now that every man that I love or who is in my life appreciates women and respects women and doesn’t talk shitty about them on a sub Reddit

[–]ImplodedPotatoSalad 3 points4 points5 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Typical female "you exist for me". You just stated that men are tools for you. Such respect LOL.

You dont know what love even is. But again, what to expect?

[–]HyakuBikki 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

it's so funny when the feminist trolls oust themselves lmao. and of course she didn't reply to you after that.

[–]Relativity_Star10538 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Riiiight. Women only want nice guys. Women are not picky. You should take that comedy routine to Vegas. But it will bomb, because it's so false it isn't funny.

[+][deleted] -13 points-12 points-11 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

This article does not hate on men, or attribute male loneliness to some individual moral failing of men. It attributes male loneliness to technology, work culture, online dating, and stagnating wages. It only says males can INCREASE their competitiveness in the sexual marketplace by being more emotionally available and gaining career skills, because WOMEN care about these things, and WOMEN currently are the ones doing most of the sexual selection. If men valued career skills in women, women would be told the same thing… but men don’t really care about that.

[–]Guess_My_Name2448 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

"Emotionally available" my ass.

Most women care primarly about looks (as do men btw) and are by nature hypergamous. The rise of social media and dating apps has brought women's standards to unprecedented heights by giving them unlimited access to men and male validation.

Before the Internet a woman could only get a certain amount of attention from men, which was limited by her social circle. Nowadays we are experiencing a radical transformation of the dating market, in which most men are playing a losing game.

Women are doing the selection, and they certainly are NOT selecting based on emotional availability and career skills. That's just what they are more likely to say because - let's face it - saying they discrimitate primarily on looks would make people say they are shallow.

Neither women nor men are to be blamed: the dating crisis is a product of the modern world and the Internet. And it seems it's getting worse.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

There’s no way to win with you, is there? If the article had suggested men “become better looking,” you would accuse it of perpetuating unrealistic expectations of men, or of stereotyping men as unattractive or unable to practice hygiene. You actually oppose the concept of self-improvement.

This is all projection. Women are not psychopaths like you. They are not just seeking validation. They do in fact care about looks but also personality and skills. Actually, attractiveness is not the primary determiner of biological fitness compared to the latter two. In fact, I’d say something similar about men, though men are definitely a bit more attractive-oriented.

It’s funny how you say neither women or men are to blame but exclusively talk about women seeking attention and validation and sexual access, as if this is some unchangeable biological fact. The natural implication is we must limit women’s access to men. Sorry, if limiting their options is the only way to get a woman to talk to you, you’ve gotta make the change.

[+][deleted] -12 points-11 points-10 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This article does not hate on men, or attribute male loneliness to some individual moral failing of men. It attributes male loneliness to technology, work culture, online dating, and stagnating wages. It only says males can INCREASE their competitiveness in the sexual marketplace by being more emotionally available and gaining career skills, because WOMEN care about these things, and WOMEN currently are the ones doing most of the sexual selection. If men valued career skills in women, women would be told the same thing… but men don’t really care about that.

[–]Andrew__IE 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

How could psychologist Greg Matos have sat here and wrote about a skill gap that all men need to work on?

Is he pandering? Does he have experience?

His whole article is so off to me. How can he as a man not understand what it’s like to date as a man in the 2020s?

[–]red_philosopher 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

u/copeharderhun wrote a pretty fantastic bit about women and men, and what women find attractive. In the context of Feminism and society, and the men and women in it, the conclusion is spot on. I would, however, like to clarify their work because it has a few errors that need brushing up.

We have to remember that the average person is not going to comprehend or understand the differences between "emotionally available" and "emotionally intelligent". Emotional availability is, by and large, the degree to which a person can share a healthy emotional connection. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4516809/

Emotional intelligence, on the other hand, is generally the ability to effectively use, identify, manage, handle, etc. the emotions of oneself and to a lesser extent others. A certain degree of emotional intelligence is a necessary prerequisite for emotional availability. One cannot have a healthy emotional connection if one's ability to apply and manage their emotions is poor.

To make matters more complicated, "emotional availability" has long been twisted to mean being "emotionally vulnerable" (ie: sharing your emotions, etc.) This is a flat out incorrect interpretation of emotionally available. Women are not interested in emotionally vulnerable men. They are, however, interested in emotionally intelligent men.

Copeharderhun is citing work that is not incorrect. Women do select for dark triad personality traits, and they also do find emotionally vulnerable men less attractive. The reason for this is particularly clear when the above differences between emotionally [available/intelligent/vulnerable] is understood. Men with dark triad personality traits tend to exhibit emotional intelligence moreso than their mundane counterparts. They are capable of leveraging emotions to the benefit of themselves and to a lesser extent others.

Women may also select these kinds of men more frequently because emotional intelligence takes time to learn, and is a hallmark of a well-grounded and effective adult. Children are not well versed in the difficulties of managing emotions, and tend to be emotionally vulnerable- that is, they need help to learn and understand and grow from their emotions. Why would any woman be interested in a man who is as emotionally functional as a child? It would be bad enough that they have to coach their own children, but a man as well? Unlikely.

The bottom line is, learn to communicate effectively, learn how to manage your emotions and learn how to effectively identify and respond to others' emotions, and heal from any traumatic experience that may be getting in the way of that. Don't get caught up in the misapplied definitions of the media; it's written for the lowest common denominator.

[–]Affectionate-School3 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That’s all fine, but the problem is the absolute views on gender expectations. Your analysis applies as much to women as it does to men. We tend to complain here that men are expected to change and woman aren’t. Women also need to address communication effectiveness. Passive communication leading to mob communication is not adult communication.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Women want good men. Is that really something you're mad at? Would you want your daughter to date someone like yourself?? Probably not.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter