I can understand that blue pillers disagree with the red pillers and even that they're offended by the red pill.

I understand that TBP is a "satire" sub, but sometimes, it doesn't always seem like they're joking. Sometimes, it seems like they may be making a mountain out of a molehill, portraying TRP as something more than what it really is.

I've seen some here compare TRP to a "hate group," but I don't see anything like that at all. I've seen how true hate groups operate, and I can tell the difference. While one might discern a good deal of anger, frustration, and resentment - to suggest that it's rooted in hatred may be a bit of an overstatement.

Also, apart from the specialized terminology used by TRP, it's not that far off from what men may discuss when they're only among other men. When women aren't around, men might feel more at ease in sharing their candid thoughts with other men. Even those men who consider themselves anti-RP would have to admit that they've been exposed to typical "locker room talk" at some point or another. It's not really intended for women to hear or read about, so the feminist freak-out over TRP's alleged "misogyny" may be misplaced and overblown.

So, my question to Blue Pillers and those who identify as anti-RP: While it's understood that you may have valid reasons for disagreeing with the philosophy of the Red Pill, do you think it's really as dangerous and toxic as feminists or blue pillers might portray it?