TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

    • /r/AllPillDebate
    • /r/AlreadyRed
    • /r/altTRP
    • /r/AntiFeminists
    • /r/askFDS
    • /r/askMRP
    • /r/askRPC
    • /r/becomeaman
    • /r/BlackPillScience
    • /r/Chadfish
    • /r/Divorce_Men
    • /r/EverydayMisandry
    • /r/ExRedPill
    • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
    • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
    • /r/GEOTRP
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • /r/MalePsychology
    • /r/Male_Studies
    • /r/MenSupportMen
    • /r/MGTOW2
    • /r/MuslimRedPill
    • /r/newTRP
    • /r/PussyPass
    • /r/PussyPassDenied
    • /r/RedPillBooks
    • /r/RedPillParenting
    • /r/RedPillWives
    • /r/RedPillWomen
    • /r/RedPillWorkplace
    • /r/RPChristians
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/ThankTRP
    • /r/TheRedPillStories
    • /r/trpGAME
    • /r/TRPOffTopic
    • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
    • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

    • Artful Prudence
    • A Voice for Men
    • Alpha Game
    • Black Label Logic
    • Caleb Jones
    • Captain Capitalism
    • Corporate Machiavelli
    • Days of Game
    • Deep Strength
    • Dicipres
    • Donal Graeme
    • Female Misogynist
    • Free Northerner
    • Gaming My Wife
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • In Mala Fide
    • KillToParty
    • Kill Your Inner Loser
    • Krauser PUA
    • LaidNYC
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • NO MA'AM
    • Omega Virgin Revolt
    • Pook's Mill
    • Random Xpat Rantings
    • Red Pill Theory
    • Red Pill Wifery
    • RedPillDad
    • RedPillDoctor
    • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
    • Sigma Frame
    • The Feminine Woman
    • The Futurist
    • The Masculine Principle
    • The Modern Man
    • The New Modern Man
    • The Obsidian Files
    • The Power Moves
    • The Private Man
    • The Red Pill Room
    • The Red Quest
    • The Rules Revisited
    • The Spearhead
    • Troy Francis
    • Wintery Knight
    • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

Keanu Reeves was sued by a woman who suggested that he used hypnosis and impersonated her ex-husband to impregnate her. She sought $3 million in spousal support from the actor, and $150,000/month, retroactively, in child support. DNA test proved he was not the father and the suit was thrown out.

U3mR6

January 17, 2018
3204 upvotes
/r/MensRights
https://www.usmagazine.com/celebrity-news/news/keanu-reeves-paternity-suits-were-horrible-201154/
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title Keanu Reeves was sued by a woman who suggested that he used hypnosis and impersonated her ex-husband to impregnate her. She sought $3 million in spousal support from the actor, and $150,000/month, retroactively, in child support. DNA test proved he was not the father and the suit was thrown out.
Author

U3mR6

Upvotes 3204
Comments 186
Date January 17, 2018 12:41 PM UTC
(8 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/7r0p4l/keanu_reeves_was_sued_by_a_woman_who_suggested/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/keanu-reeves-was-sued-by-a-woman-who-suggested.907655
https://theredarchive.com/post/907655
Top posts by U3mR6

Females are four times more sensitive than males to economic status cues when rating opposite sex attractiveness, indicating that higher economic status can offset lower physical attractiveness in men much more easily than in women.

218 upvotes
December 30, 2017
/r/MGTOW

DailyMail's A Hypocrite!

19 upvotes
January 21, 2018
/r/MGTOW

DailyMail's A Hypocrite!

11 upvotes
January 21, 2018
/r/MensRights

Face it kids, when you're dealing with the opposite sex, you're only asking for trouble. -Jessie (Team Rocket)

8 upvotes
March 10, 2017
/r/MGTOW

Males and females show differences in behavior since earliest stages of life | A shocking small boy chasing a group of dogs

1 upvotes
November 26, 2017
/r/MGTOW

Comments

[–][deleted] 483 points484 points485 points 8 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link

$150k/mo? That bitch just wanted money.

[–][deleted] 290 points291 points292 points 8 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

The bitch was probably delusional as well.

I am center of the universe. That’s why the one might have fucked me. I got the seed from the one.

[–]Tgunner192 74 points75 points76 points 8 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Funny how delusional people always have this story where somebody owes them $150k/mo. Since they are delusional it could just as easily be a story where they owe somebody $150k/mo but it never is, must be just dumb luck.

[–]rillip 6 points7 points8 points 8 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

150k? That's a mighty awful lot. As a delusional person myself I think I could get by if you'd put up say... $3.50

[–]Youwokethewrongdog 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

When I see loch ness monster memes I think "yes"

[–]Tgunner192 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I can't afford to be delusional. If I was, I'd be the one stupid delusional son of a bitch that thinks I owe someone else money.

[–]trygold 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Why don't the voices people hear tell them to do good things?

[–][deleted] 8 points9 points10 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

She's obviously not a normal human being. I'm guessing she has a personality disorder. There aren't going to be any stories of decent people working things out in a rational manner, because who will flock to read that kind of story? Where's the audience for that?

I come here to learn about stories like this one, and it's been enlightening. I just kinda worry about you guys, to be honest. It's really important to find people and even stories about strangers where people do the right thing, you know? For your own well being.

[–]seeking101 14 points15 points16 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

retroactive too dont forget

[–]guillemqv 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Really??? Who would have guessed... I thought the hypnosis part was a decisive factor to prove what the woman said!

/s

[–]serialcharly 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

No Shit, Sherlock

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Nick? Is that you?

[–]NoFap81 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Keep digging, Watson!

[–]moose-rider32 734 points735 points736 points 8 years ago (40 children) | Copy Link

They did a DNA test? Those misogynists. Don't they believe the victim??

[–]nelsonblaha 106 points107 points108 points 8 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

Always believe the victim.

[–][deleted] 45 points46 points47 points 8 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Victims are never wrong!

[–]Leroyjankins8989 28 points29 points30 points 8 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

And they most certainly cannot have a penis, gross.

[–][deleted] 25 points26 points27 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Men can't get raped, not even by other men.

[–]IKnowVeryMuch 11 points12 points13 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

This comment chain was funny, but then I remembered that's actually how it works

[–]obnoxiousghost 3 points4 points5 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

It turned from funny to sad :(

[–]moose-rider32 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Hahaha oh....

[–]Jermeiah 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The accuser.

[–]Jermeiah 49 points50 points51 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

"On matters of sex, women are not expected to tell the truth, hence cases of rape on grown women should be thoroughly investigated. I have heard some of these cases in New York police courts, some of which were white women who accused Negroes of attacking them, and in nearly every case it turned out that both had been lovers, and that the woman was trying to be revenged on the man... It will at least... be admitted that cases of rape should not be heard with the mob as judge and jury.

...

Dr. William J. Robinson says: 'I repeat the injunction that I have given so many, many times. Be very, very careful before giving any credence to any accusation of rape. At least ninety of every hundred cases of accusations of assaults on females are false. In some instances the accusers are hysterical and believe their dreams and vicious unrealities."

  • Sex & Race Volume 3, 1940s

[–]Crusader_1096 26 points27 points28 points 8 years ago (28 children) | Copy Link

Paternity tests are banned in France and some other European countries.

[–]AmericanHair 12 points13 points14 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Only personal paternity tests. Court ordered tests are legal.

[–]IKnowVeryMuch 9 points10 points11 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That's not a good thing

[–]Eastuss 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

What's forbidden is you to take the initiative to make one, judges can order paternity test if they feel like it is necessary. Be more precise when you spread informations, please.

[–]Crusader_1096 4 points5 points6 points 8 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

When you aren't allowed to do something yourself without express permission from your government then that thing is effectively banned. I'm not allowed to shoot heroin in the U.S. but if I'm an undercover cop and a judge signs off on something granting me permission to do it anyway for the sake of my job and mission, that doesn't mean that shooting heroin isn't still banned in the U.S.

Go be a concern troll somewhere else.

[–]Eastuss 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

The fact I talk about this doesn't make me an apologist of how things are in France. Thus why I am not concern trolling.

When you express things this way, you look like men are never going to be able to know if they're the father or not, which is not the case. Killing someone is forbidden and you'll never have the right to ask a judge that someone gets killed. But you can ask for something you don't have the right to do yourself for no proper reason.

Last time I got called concern troll, it was on T_D on a thread that called out france as under sharia law... You sound exactly like them...

[–]Crusader_1096 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

I'm not surprised you pull the same shit in T_D either. You're basically being disingenuous and splitting hairs on technicality when the word I used is absolutely correct. Your example just goes to show how wrong you are again. Killing people is perfectly legal within the context of an executioner (legal in the U.S. anyway). They have special permission to do what they do from the state. "Killing" is still against the law here. "Killing" is still banned here. There's just exceptions to the rule. Same thing for legally justified self-defense scenarios in which the defender kills their assailant (except exoneration is granted after the fact and not before).

[+]Eastuss1 points 8 years ago* [recovered] (6 children) | Copy Link

I'm not surprised you pull the same shit in T_D eithe

I'm surprised you're OK with over exaggeration done without knowing jack shit.

Killing people is perfectly legal within the context of an executioner (legal in the U.S. anyway).

But not in France, and you don't become executioner by just requesting it, and you aren't executioner to kill the people you want for your own benefit.

Same thing for legally justified self-defense scenarios in which the defender kills their assailant (except exoneration is granted after the fact and not before).

Oh boi that one is pretty messy in France. :')

[–]Crusader_1096 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

I'm surprised you're OK with over exaggeration done without knowing jack shit.

You really think I'm going to trust your clearly biased and one-sided account? Fuck you, buddy.

But not in France, and you don't become executioner by just requesting it, and you aren't executioner to kill the people you want for your own benefit.

Again, you're splitting hairs over technicalities and purposefully being disingenuous when you knew my meaning was that the phrase "killing is banned" is technically correct in the U.S. BUT there are exceptions to the rule.

Oh boi that one is pretty messy in France. :')

I'm aware that your laws around self-defense are just as cucked as your laws concerning paternity testing. Don't know what else to tell you, I'm glad I'm not French and you're probably glad you're not American.

[–]Eastuss 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

BUT there are exceptions to the rule.

I understand your point, and I answer to your point that the exceptions aren't here for your own benefit but for the state's/gov's benefit.

I'm aware that your laws around self-defense are just as cucked as your laws concerning paternity testing. Don't know what else to tell you, I'm glad I'm not French and you're probably glad you're not American.

I find the laws around self-defense to be absurdly ridiculous even if I understand the intent. My intent wasn't to complain about it but simply joke about it. I somehow envy the USA for having more self-preserving values. Every system have their own shit.

When I learned about france's rules about paternity test I was angry because it is taking control from us in a system where we already have no control over pregnancy/abortion/our finances. But after talking with people who studied laws a bit, it seems that things aren't so much definitive as they look.

[–]Crusader_1096 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

When you sacrifice essential individual liberty for the sake of the state/government, that is folly. An executioner aids individuals in seeking retributive justice in its most ultimate form. It's not just about the benefit of the state in that case.

People have convinced you that preventing fathers from getting paternity tests is bad for society and bad for the state. These laws literally promote cuckoldry, I'm not just being hyperbolic when I call them "cucked" because that's what they are. It's also a devastating blow to truth. When you have a society that refuses to acknowledge certain truths for the sake of greater social cohesion or whatever hard-to-quantify bullshit reason they give, you disrespect and infantilize your citizens, you undermine trust in the state, and in this case you establish sexist double-standards that actively discriminate against a man's right to know whether or not he is raising someone else's child.

[–]da_ting_go 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link

That's ridiculous. I know personal paternity tests are the banned ones, but what could possibly be the reasoning behind that?

[+]Pyrepenol -10 points-9 points-8 points 8 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link

It's not so ridiculous if you consider their mindset as being that society rather than biology determines the father. After a man helps raise a kid for 12 years, the worst thing for everyone would be to go get the cheapest paternity test they could afford and decide the future of the family based on it. I personally wouldn't feel comfortable with that considering the false result rate of some tests like this, but a lot of people don't know better. And again, the end could result only in disrupting a family which already has a perfectly fine dad to begin with. If that's not the case, go to court and get it worked out properly instead of letting www.IsHeTheDaddy.com decide it for you.

[–]VinterMute 12 points13 points14 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Or the court would rather a fraud victim pick up the bill than them. You think there is a social backlash against testing your kid for peace of mind now, imagine having to actually sue for it.

[–]bananashammock 6 points7 points8 points 8 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

I think it's still pretty ridiculous, yeah.

[–]Pyrepenol 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

Yeah well they'd probably call us psychopaths for allowing people the ability to absolve their duty as loving parents based only on the results of a cheap consumer test.

[–]moose-rider32 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

So ban tests with an unacceptable failure rate and have instructions to take the test twice. There's probably already a standard in place or else I could sell Moose paternity test kit which features a coin with patented Flipez technology.

[–]Pyrepenol 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago* (5 children) | Copy Link

I'm just making the point that they see it much differently from top to bottom. They put social family above biological family unless it becomes enough of an issue for a judge to intervene. I can at least respect them for caring about the concept of family most, even if it might possibly be abused occasionally. They probably look at shows like Jerry Springer and think we're fucking nuts-- I think they as a society only care about who has cared most for the child rather than labeling stepdads as some shitty backup dad who can abandon the kid at any time only because he wasn't the one to fuck his mom at his conception. Theirs is just a fundamentally more emphatic view in terms of what is best for the kid.

Also I won't be expecting much new regulation from the FDA anytime soon.

[–]moose-rider32 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Well I feel the same way when I see Springer (or saw back in the 90s when it was relevant). I think you may be romanticizing the law banning paternity tests. I think it's more about giving the courts more power to regulate family financial responsibility instead of letting families decide outside the courts. I'm just not convinced that law really helps families... If the issue was just false negatives, then you could just regulate the tests tighter (FDA wouldn't recommend new regulations on such a product for a variety of reasons, one of which being they don't regulate France).

[–]Pyrepenol 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

I'd argue that just giving the public the ability to check paternity on any random whim inherently introduces reasons for mistrust in the family, all over something that their culture does not hold much value over in the first place. I challenge you to think of a single positive thing a DNA test could to help a family, besides obviously relieving the manufactured fears over a negative result itself. At the end of the day, a mother getting monthly child support is not a good replacement for a good dad, biological or not.

I totally get that this is entirely incompatable with how America does things, but at the same time I also understand that running the marathon called our family court system is one of the toughest things a kid, let alone a family, can suffer through-- my overall point being that it's all in service of "disproving" something that is entirely subjective: who the kid calls dad.

[–]bananashammock 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If the test isn't legally admissible, They can't simply absolve their duties.

[–]2cats2hats -2 points-1 points0 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Downvoting this reply is shooting the messenger folks.

[–]NefariouslySly 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Honestly why was the burden of proof on him in the first place?

[–]moose-rider32 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

ahem mmmmmmmaaaaaaaaaalllllleeeeee :)

[–][deleted] 162 points163 points164 points 8 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

I hope she was jailed.

[–]Esurugby11 59 points60 points61 points 8 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

48 hours MAX

[–][deleted] 69 points70 points71 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Pat on head for 48 seconds. So that she would not be like this again.

Probably had too much potential for being jailed.

[+]Trajer -18 points-17 points-16 points 8 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Max security is a bit much though

[–][deleted] 25 points26 points27 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

For fraud that would have exceeded $2 million every year? Yeah no

[–]Trajer 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

It was a joke... Because he said MAX as in "no longer than 48 hours" but I was joking about it being a max security prison...

Whoosh?

[–]moose-rider32 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Tough crowd

[–]Trajer 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I always knew I would fail at stand up :(

[–]Code3LI 16 points17 points18 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Probably a slap on the wrist, in which she then said was sexual assault and sued the court system.

But seriously, she better have been.

[–]5th_Law_of_Robotics 9 points10 points11 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I hope she was jailed.

Ha!

[–]2cats2hats 4 points5 points6 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

No she had to pay all court costs and fines associated with tying up the system.

[–]The_0bserver 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

DNA results probably proved the kid is not his. And nothing more. So it probably just got closed for lack of evidence or some shit. :/

Doubt she ever got into any trouble.

[–]VapidReaper 185 points186 points187 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

πŸ˜‚ you can't get neo

[–][deleted] 63 points64 points65 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It is one of the reasons that he is the one who stopped the war.

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points8 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Neo dodging pregnancy claims.

[–]chadwickofwv 6 points7 points8 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I think this one works better.

[–]jacksleepshere 291 points292 points293 points 8 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

Targeting Keanu is crossing te line.

[–]TheMagicStik 41 points42 points43 points 8 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

The man's a national treasure.

[–]akihikoTakashi 16 points17 points18 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Don't say that in front of Nicholas cage.

[–]Blutarg 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Indeed!

[–]such-a-mensch -4 points-3 points-2 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

He's Canadian.

[–]TheMagicStik 8 points9 points10 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

He lived in Canada for like 5 years, he wasnt born there, neither of his parents are Canadian and he has lived in the US the majority of his life, how is he Canadian?

Not that it matters, I didnt even specify a nation he would be a treasure to.

[–]dejour 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You raise a decent point, but he moved to Canada early enough to attend kindergarten in Toronto. And he was still in Toronto when he ended his high school days. He dropped out at 17 and headed to LA at 20.

Maybe it's because I watch so much sports, but there is generally an understanding that it's the city or country where the person spent most of his/her childhood years that gets to claim the person. If he played hockey (and Keanu was a goalie), Canada would generally claim him. That said, due to his parents, he would definitely have had the opportunity to play for the US team if he wanted. Or Lebanon.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

He is a universal treasure.

[–]Istalriblaka 4 points5 points6 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I feel like the moment the jury found out the situation, they pretty much knew she was a crazy lying bitch.

[–]aspinningcircle 82 points83 points84 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

There's not going to be any straight men left in Hollywood.

[–]moose-rider32 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Does being gay protect you from accusations?

[–]HistoriaBestGirl 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Kevin Spacey

[–]Jam_44 35 points36 points37 points 8 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

lol like Keanu Reeves would need to use hypnosis for women to sleep with him...

[–]da_ting_go 3 points4 points5 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That's instantly where my mind went when I saw the title of this topic.

[–]Tramm 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

No no. He used his Keanu charm to sleep with her... he only hypnotized her just before he came. Get your facts straight.

[–]seeking101 102 points103 points104 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

So you're telling me I can dodge lawsuits?

No, Neo. What Im telling you is that as a famous male actor you will be bombarded with them.

[–]RapidFireSlowMotion 20 points21 points22 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Gee, that's not nearly as motivating as the movie line

[–]seeking101 17 points18 points19 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

the real red pill

[–]Blutarg 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

No, Neo. What I'm telling you is that when your accuser is a whacko, you won't have to.

[–]theoldboiler 21 points22 points23 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Headlines: Keanu Reeves used hypnosis to impersonate woman's husband in order to impregnate her, victim claims.

The reason it's OPs headline and not mine is only because dude took a fucking D.N.A. test to "prove" his innocence.

[–]TheInfra 13 points14 points15 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

no no. In today's world it would be more like:

"Did Keanu Reeves use hypnosis to impersonate woman's husband in order to impregnate her?"

Then on the article just put up the claim and pass it as evidence. Of the claim. Not of the actual act.

Also, like this

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Or the classic "Keanu Reeves allegedly impersonates woman's husband and rapes her"

[–]TheDemeisen 45 points46 points47 points 8 years ago (22 children) | Copy Link

Who the hell is the lawyer that would take that case?

[+]Draestyn1 points 8 years ago* [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link

A lot of times, people settle just to avoid court

[–]TheDemeisen 11 points12 points13 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

What a crappy legal system... but then they all are.

[–]Cant_Ban_All_MRAs 11 points12 points13 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

https://www.thestar.com/news/ontario/2010/01/07/judge_dismisses_keanu_reeves_paternity_suit.html

She did not have a lawyer; she represented herself as crazy often does.

[–]TheDemeisen 3 points4 points5 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Her client was a total fool then.

[–]Blutarg 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Someone who thinks it's worth their trouble to have a chance at 10% of three million bucks.

[+]billythestudly -31 points-30 points-29 points 8 years ago (16 children) | Copy Link

I bet I could describe his/her nose to you.

[–]RAANT 21 points22 points23 points 8 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

Pinocchio isn't a lawyer.

[–]billythestudly -1 points0 points1 point 8 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

At least someone got it. I'm surprised how many people came at me with 'don't be an anti semite!'

[–]ARandompass3rby 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Dude you should have made it a tiny bit more obvious like making a fullstop hyperlink to a picture of pinnochio.

People assumed you were talking about Jews because of shitholes like /Pol/.

[–]billythestudly -3 points-2 points-1 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

You sorta sound like an SJW now. THOUGHT POLICE THOUGHT POLICE. No offense intended; I'm sure you didn't mean it that way.

Like I said above, anti-semitism is illegal in a lot of places and I don't want to go to jail for saying a bad word about our beloved Jewish folks. Thank god I can still shit talk catholics.

[–]ARandompass3rby 4 points5 points6 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

That's not how I intended to sound, I'm completely fine with jokes about Jews and stuff it really doesn't bother me, they're just jokes. I was just suggesting how you could have avoided the assumption bandwagonning.

[–]billythestudly 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

All good; thanks ;D

[–]ARandompass3rby 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Have a nice day man, good talk

[–]caydos2 -2 points-1 points0 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Lmao the dude is clearly trying to backpedal now

[–]billythestudly 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Christ you guys are thick.

[–]caydos2 -2 points-1 points0 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Christ you like to backpedal.

[–]billythestudly 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If you think that's backpedaling then you're not as smart as you think you are, Juden.

[–]theAnalepticAlzabo 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Fuck off with that 'joos are teh EVILS' crap.

[+]billythestudly -7 points-6 points-5 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I never said any such thing. You're projecting.

[–]Chronic_BOOM 4 points5 points6 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Totally projecting.

So what’d you mean by that remark about the lawyer’s nose?

[–]billythestudly 4 points5 points6 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

They're liars --

I've got no strings To hold me down To make me fret Or make me frown I had strings But now I'm free There are no strings on me

[+]billythestudly -8 points-7 points-6 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

btw, anti-semitism is illegal in a lot of countries. better be careful with that stuff, even tongue-in-cheek.

[–]Invicturion 16 points17 points18 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The fact thathe NEEDED to take that test is insane on its own...

[–]Proteus_Marius 48 points49 points50 points 8 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

How does woo-encrusted batshittery even make it to a court room?

[–]trp_angry_dwarf 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

I can't believe this is so far down the list of comments.

[–]chadwickofwv 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I can, for one simple reason. Using the word "woo" to describe something is one of the best indicators that a person knows little to nothing about the subject they are talking about.

[–]Proteus_Marius 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Sorry; did I cause a imbalance in your chakras?

[–]Proteus_Marius 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Sweet. There's no where else to go but down or up from here.

[–]Wasuremaru 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You can sue for anything. I can bring a suit against you alleging that you forced me to snort cocaine off of the shaved rump of a sleeping grizzly bear by threatening to shoot my dog with a 14th century crossbow you brought here by time travel. None of that means I will win the suit or that it won't get thrown out through a summary judgment of "Come on, your honor? Really?".

[–]mwobuddy 92 points93 points94 points 8 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

https://www.reddit.com/r/todayilearned/comments/7qxq5r/til_keanu_reeves_was_sued_by_a_woman_who/

Here's the original reddit.

Look at those posts! people are starting to get red pilled. God thank crazy money grubbing women proving that women lie about sexual assault for a chance at fame + money.

[–][deleted] 27 points28 points29 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That's what I was about to say. Lots of pro-male sentiment, and others who weren't aware of how messed up things are being informed.

[–]timdesuyo 5 points6 points7 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

https://youtu.be/x0gaYyNk7QA?t=1m3s

[–]chadwickofwv 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That man knows far more about the world than he leads on.

[–]WideExemplification 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

i posted a bunch myself, i take pride in being downvoted to shit

[–]SushiGato 15 points16 points17 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This shit is why I have a very hard time believing so many accusers. Like with Garrison Keilor being fired for hugging a crying co-worker and putting his hand on her back in support. That's fucked. Or when a ex porn star rightwing radio host says Franken groped her, but fails to mention how she grabbed his dick in front of every one before that happened. Its such bullshit.

[–]Uberzwerg 5 points6 points7 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

A lesson learned in Germany in the 90s:
Anyone remember Boris becker the famous tennis star?
One day a woman sued him over the fathership of a little girl and he was like "i never fucked her - she just gave me a blowjob one day".
But he didn't see her swallow - BAM, he's really the father and had to pay a shit-ton of child support.

[–]kragshot 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

That don't mean shit.

Phillips vs. Irons.

Dude wore a condom while she sucked him off. She took the used condom and impregnated herself. Courts didn't care. The judge pretty much ruled whichever way a woman gets your sperm, if it is in her possession, she has the right to use it as she sees fit. And you will be the daddy if she impregnates herself with it.

I can't find the link right now, but there was a thread on "Ask Men" where this guy's girlfriend was offended and upset because after they had sex, if it was anywhere other than his place, he would pour alcohol in the condom, tie it up, bag it, and then take it home with him. Three-quarters of the comments were women and white knights shaming him about what he was doing.

*Edit...Found the link to the thread.

Horsey sauce, Franks Red Hot Sauce, bleach; whatever you have to do to keep your sperm under your control.

[–]J0kerr 5 points6 points7 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

And did she face any penalty for trying to steal from/destroy someones life?

[–]aimingforzero 5 points6 points7 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Poor Keanu...he's been through so much, is so nice, and people still try to pull this shit on him? Also- That's one of the most creative accusations I've ever heard. Didn't even drug her- he HYPNOTIZED HER.

[–]FastFourierTerraform 3 points4 points5 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

The thing that's important to note here is this isn't even that unusual. People wonder why dudes send unsolicited dick pics. Because 1 in 1000 times, it works. Same thing here. Male celebrities are under a constant barrage of false accusations by people looking for a payout. Most of the time, if journalists and lawyers do their job, we never hear about it. But every once in a while, some activist judge or some unethical reporter will move forward, and suddenly throwing the crazy person $100k to save yourself the headache seems like a really good deal. Glad Keanu came out ahead here.

[–]Teknikal69 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

One in a thousand wouldn't actually work truthfully I think it's closer to 1 in 3. I hate to break it to the people of reddit but feamales tend to like sex at least (if not substantially more) as much as males.

I'm a male btw but I believe what I wrote.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Holy shit your comment history is a weird mixture of /r/iamverysmart, /r/thathappened, and mind boggingly bad sentence structure.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

neo is not the one

[–]ErdTheBird99 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This satisfies two Reddit sweet spots right now: Keanu and debunking false accusations of people we like.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

She’s from my hometown, and this was huge news when it happened. I think her kids may have changed their last names.

[–]run_mochila 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

All I really want to know is if she had to pay his court fees after the fact. It's fucking outrageous that you can take people to court in attempt to sue people for anything.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

metoo

[–]Wolosocu 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

$3 million a month spousal support and $150k for child support. Well we can see where her priorities were.

[–]patricarchy 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

He's lucky this didn't happen in the #metoo era. He would have had his career derailed with one anonymous tweet.

[–]5th_Law_of_Robotics 4 points5 points6 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Listen and believe! Women are biologically incapable of lying. It's a femfact.

[–]Trajer 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I hope they showed the results Maury-style. Keanu Reeves, you are... NOT THE FATHER!

[–]Catmouth 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

So is Keanu Uther Pendragon now?

[–]Violent_Paprika 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

So fake obviously everyone knows vampires get a -100% debuff to fertility.

[–]yoshi314 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

so no one contested the ludicrity of 150k/month until the dna test?

or am i just jumping to conclusions?

[–]moose-rider32 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I like to think that the logic was "yeah this is crazy, but easiest thing is do the dna test and don't even give someone the chance to entertain it's validity"

[–]Zyklon_Bae 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Why the hell didn't this get thrown out LONG before a DNA test was done? What utter lunacy!

[–]chadwickofwv 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

We seriously need a one year statute of limitations on child support to stop bullshit like this.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

$150k a month? Wtf she doing with her kid? Buying gold lined nappies or some shit?

[–]moose-rider32 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Anti hypno spray

[–]doublesailorsandcola 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If Keanu wanted to pick some random married woman to impregnate, he wouldn’t have to use hypnosis and impersonate the husband. He could just show up being his charming self. Clearly this lady is a few crayons short of a full box.

[–]Terminal-Psychosis 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Some men are in jail right now for not being able to pay,

even though the DNA test came out negative!

Our court systems are totally sexist and abusive. :(

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

One could say he dodged that bullet!

[–]Giovannnnnnnni 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

What sucks is that every time someone does this, the defendant still has to pay for a lawyer.

[–]chris0720 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

They should just hire Tucker Max for cases like this.

[–]Brehmes 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Neo: So you're telling me that I can dodge paternity suits?

Morpheus: No Neo, I'm telling you that when you're ready a legitimately good dude, you won't have to.

[–]Teknikal69 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm going to just say it hypnotism is utter bullshit, it's people who play along for fun or people who are desperate trying to make it so.

Hypnotism is nonsense, I myself even had a few years where I desperately wanted to learn how it worked my ultimate conclusion is while it makes for good entertainment it's ultimately nonsense.

ie: not a real thing why are courts going along with nonsense.

[–]AmuseDeath 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

#believeallwomen

[–]fsphoenix 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Facts aside....what the flying fuck. $150,000 a MONTH for child support?

[–]McFeely_Smackup 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

that's the outrageous part of this story for you?

[–]fsphoenix 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Yes actually

[–]McFeely_Smackup 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

that's like #3 on the list for me.

[–]AyyyGreens 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Anyone who has done hypnosis and isn’t a sucker knows that you can’t hypnotize someone into doing whatever they want. It’s just impossible unless they were already incredibly susceptible to suggestion. The more likely and logical answer is that she lied, and didn’t do her research.

[–]LabTech41 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Why the fuck would you need a DNA test? How do you not just throw the case out on account of the inherent absurdity of the accusation? I mean, fine, do the test just so that all the i's are dotted and all the t's are crossed, but holy fuck what a blatant and obvious case of extortion.

[–]HedgeTheHog 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Nice try.

[–]abacabbmk 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Hmmmm.... i guess we know if she took the red or blue pill.... because she still got pregnant

[–]winningtimes909 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

She should have taken the blue pill instead.

[–]ArmaniDiamonds 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Dear god. I hope every male actor starts a hashtag for every time they were falsely accused. This shit is ridiculous. #ImATarget

[–]coltninja 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yes, children, that is called a civil suit. This is what happens to stupid ones.

[–]roguetrooper 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

So she was saying that he dipped his wick?

[–]Bing_Bang_Bam 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Now I see why it's sad keanu

[–]loki-things 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

He did the same to me and I knocked up that girl from the paint store down the street. I want money.

[–]Waldhorn 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

What? No One believed the Victim? #metoo, Remake all of his movies without him, now or I skreeeeee

[–]Akesgeroth 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

So, enough people think Keanu Reeves has psychic powers to get this to court.

[–]ash_park 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

#ibelieveher

[–]JackFisherBooks 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I honestly thought this was an Onion article when I first heard about it. The fact that it isn't kind of disturbs me.

[–]GeneralCottonmouth 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

fuck all this Keanu bullshit

[–]tcs911 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Right? If I never see another Keanu update, it will be too soon

[+]akamustacherides1 points 8 years ago* [recovered] (3 children) | Copy Link

and she went on to start the #metoo movement.

[–]5th_Law_of_Robotics 8 points9 points10 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

She was later raped by Aziz Ansari when he ordered her white wine with her shellfish.

[+]akamustacherides1 points 8 years ago* [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link

But everyone knows she prefers red wine!

[–]tallwheel 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yep. Wine selection rape... again.

[–]MGTOWManofMystery -1 points0 points1 point 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

What about #MeToo? I thought men were guilty by default always!

What about that crazy YouTuber who claims she mind melds with Brent Spiner?

[–]BlueNosePolarBear -1 points0 points1 point 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I prefer PoundMeToo.

[+]SniffJizzer1 points 8 years ago [recovered] (6 children) | Copy Link

I swear some bitches deserve to get domestically abused

[–]Alpaca_For_President 37 points38 points39 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

We aren’t a hate group man. If you are going to talk like that please fuck off.

[+]SniffJizzer -11 points-10 points-9 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Just sayin

[–]SirSausagePants 15 points16 points17 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Easy there skippy. DV is not cool, in any context.

[–]bladexp210 5 points6 points7 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Don't let your anger get the best of you mate. We have to be better than those who wrong us.

[–]Infrah -4 points-3 points-2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

- Antifa as they trash the town

[–]5th_Law_of_Robotics -1 points0 points1 point 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Or you know, fined for filing a frivolous suit.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

Β© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter