Judge Judy has spoken. Get it together, you Cucks.

[–]Luzer606 27 points28 points29 points 9 years ago (49 children) | Copy Link

[+][deleted] -18 points-17 points-16 points 9 years ago (48 children) | Copy Link

[–]CurtisAxelmania 18 points19 points20 points 9 years ago (46 children) | Copy Link

[–]Mens-Advocate 7 points8 points9 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[+][deleted] -21 points-20 points-19 points 9 years ago* (44 children) | Copy Link

Oh please, get a grip.

If you lose a court case and thereafter set fire to yourself and then try to suggest what happened to you was like being tortured then you're a fuckwit.

Don't get me wrong it's understandable that fuckwits lose court cases and, no doubt the court system has favoured mothers.

Although unless you can show in your particular case that the mother is unfit then why shouldn't she win? Short of cutting children in half if you have 2 good parents then the kids live with one. Either way it's "unfair" to one of them but equally doesn't really matter which parent "wins"

Most of the way divorcing parents behave shows they are not fit to have kids. I speak from the point of view of the real victim - having once been one of the kids the 2 cunts are fighting over. And, trust me here, the self-pity and nonsense they demonstrate throughout isn't reflected in the way they treat their kids ime. They are more interested in their kids in their public protestations and court submissions than they are actually interested in their when they actually have the kids with them.

And most of what they are waffling about the other one supposedly did or didn't do isn't true or is just twisted in a way to make the other sound bad. Albeit if you want 18 years of 2 people telling you exactly why your parents are cunts then wait for your parents to divorce because it's a subject they love to share with you. Impressionable kids will probably end up believing both. "dad did this....mum did that...dad said this...mum said that" Not to mention the spiteful and jealous way they act if, say, you're going on holiday with dad or spending a christmas with mum.

So yeah, I think my parents shouldn't have been parents - and most definitely shouldn't have married each other and had kids - and neither of them can pretend to be surprised how the other one behaved because it was self evident in the rows and dramas they had before they got married or had kids. But they did it anyway.

And my parents were divorced in the UK at a time when there was no question other than my mother got custody - but that was no better or worse a decision than the reverse. You can't just say "it's not fair" - because it's a decision that can't be fair by definition.

[–]KingCavell 6 points7 points8 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]Mashiki 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (39 children) | Copy Link

If you lose a court case and thereafter set fire to yourself and then try to suggest what happened to you was like being tortured then you're a fuckwit.

No. It means that the person sees no other way to bring attention to the injustice that they've suffered at the hands of the state, law, and so on. That said state under the social contract is to treat all members in a civil way, has failed in doing so, and in some cases others cheer at what's happened to them. And believe that said suffering, even at the loss of their life is an acceptable choice.

It's no different then some poor person who's been fighting workmans comp for 20 years, hasn't worked once in 20 years, has been living on the charity and support of friends and family and simply snapping one day at wits end and driving their car through one of their buildings.

[+][deleted] -6 points-5 points-4 points 9 years ago (38 children) | Copy Link

[–]Mashiki 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (37 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago* (36 children) | Copy Link

I had plenty of time to grow up because I didn't set fire to myself, "kid"

Ironic that so many American men think calling someone kid is belittling or an insult. Especially when culturally they are emotional spastics and more like big kids when it comes to dealing with these issues than any other nation. As this subreddit full of "boo fucking hoo poor me self pity" is testament to.

It says it all really. Maybe if you all didn't have such an obvious low opinion of children you'd get custody of them, grandpa.

There's nothing interesting about setting fire to yourself. It's just a dumb, stupid and weak thing to do in response to losing a court case. And, as you can see from people equating this to torture and your own nonsensical replies it's because of an emotionally crippled, histrionic culture.

Get a fucking grip.

[–]Mashiki 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (35 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago* (34 children) | Copy Link

Nah, growing old didn't teach you anything. You're just old and dumb instead of young and dumb. A bright 12 year old was more intelligent than you when you were 12 and bright 12 year olds will still be when you're 90.

Even Judge Judy realises you're all losing your cases because you're dumb.

All you've achieved is getting closer to grey hair, wrinkling skin, failing eyesight, worsening hearing, impotence, incontinence, cancer, diabetes and death. Congratulations, grandpa, you got old.

Like I said, your "kid" and "kiddo" just shout out loud that your children would be better off with their mothers. You clearly have issues with children so much that you use the mere idea of being a child as a pathetic attempt to insult other people. Then you wonder why a court might think that "kiddos" would be better off with someone else.? Well, doh, you dumb cunt. Wake the fuck up.

There's nothing wrong with being a kid. Kids are, generally speaking, fit and healthy and have their whole lives in front of them. Try fucking harder.

[–]CurtisAxelmania 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]CurtisAxelmania 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]theothermod[M] [score hidden] 9 years ago stickied comment (36 children) | Copy Link

[+][deleted] 9 years ago* (4 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]Badgerz92 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]The_Lone_Fish17 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]theothermod 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]Jodasons878 points 9 years ago [recovered] (4 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

I'm glad and appreciate that you can recognize the mistake. Kudos for that.

I'm a MGTOW and I have more than my fair share of opinions/views that are anti-PC. I'm one of the last people to complain about "offensive language"...

But at the same time... I have a lot of respect and appreciation for the Men's Rights movement and I never push my MGTOW beliefs (Well, maybe a little but only to educate men on how dangerous it is to get married or have kids in today's society and the vulnerable position it puts them in to be fucked over by the state) or use our terminology here on this sub. I never want to do something that would undermine all the efforts that MRA's do in order to try and help men and fix these serious issues. I don't want to be responsible for delegitimizing the movement and cause other people to turn away from Men's Rights simply because of derogatory terminology like calling people "cucks"...

I think part of going down the MRA route means holding yourself to a higher standard than just going MGTOW or posting on our own subs. MRA's and this sub have to be accountable for the things that are said/posted here. They have to be very cautious about the public perception.

One of the biggest issues the Men's Rights movement faces is all the misleading propaganda that Feminists push in order to pant the MRM as vile, woman hating, bigots... They attack the movements character in order to try and delegitimize all the issues we talk about. That's a problem because men face some serious discrimination in our society and we should all try to be helping the movement succeed... Not giving feminists more ammo to use against us.

But again, thanks for admitting the mistake and promising to be more aware about that in the future.

PS. I think one of the main reasons you've pissed so many people off here isn't just because you used the term.. But because you referred to all of us here as "cucks"... Like, many of these guys have devoted their lives and spend all their free time fighting to help men and bring awareness to these issues. Many of these guys have been put through hell all in their efforts to help men everywhere. So for you to refer to them as "cucks" in your title, simply because there hasn't been enough results "in your opinion"... Well, it was pretty shitty.

Again, not trying to lecture you or run this shit into the ground.. just offering my opinion as to why so many people here are pissed off and offended by it.

Anyways, this picture is something that gets reposted here every so often.. but it's a really good quote and a nice source because She is such a recognizable figure for many people.. so thanks for posting it.

[–]Jodasons875 points 9 years ago [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link

So for you to refer to them as "cucks" in your title, simply because there hasn't been enough results "in your opinion"... Well, it was pretty shitty.

Dude, I was saying it from the hip...I mis-spoke and used the wrong term...that's it that's all...

I too fight for men's rights, and the rights of my sons who are adult men now and bear the brunt to all of this.

I have paid quite a price both socially and professionally by standing up for my views, men's rights, whenever it is called for...I for one am not going to be silent.

...I think one of our biggest challenges is men who do not stand up.

Weak men make it harder on the rest of us and our society in general...

So, anyway man, let's be guys...and do what we do best.

Someone screws up - he gets called on it - he apologizes, perhaps learns (or just messed up) - and everybody moves on, the wiser...

Cheers,

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]omegaphallic 4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]mandel17 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[+]glassuser -9 points-8 points-7 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]ButtermanJr -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

[–]DipsetUniversal 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

[–]ButtermanJr 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[–]DipsetUniversal 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]ButtermanJr -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[+][deleted] -38 points-37 points-36 points 9 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

[+][deleted] 9 years ago* (4 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[+][deleted] -2 points-1 points0 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]Badgerz92 -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[+]Oftowerbroleaning -20 points-19 points-18 points 9 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

[–]norrata 8 points9 points10 points 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

[–]Oftowerbroleaning 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]norrata -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]Oftowerbroleaning 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]darkgatherer -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]WizzleTizzleFizzle -3 points-2 points-1 points 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

[–]Demonspawn 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]WizzleTizzleFizzle 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]WizzleTizzleFizzle 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]liquidfirex 280 points281 points282 points 9 years ago (55 children) | Copy Link

[–]Devi1s_Adv0cate 178 points179 points180 points 9 years ago (19 children) | Copy Link

[–]Macismyname 98 points99 points100 points 9 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

[–]Jodasons87-1 points 9 years ago [recovered] (2 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]Shamus_Aran 62 points63 points64 points 9 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link

[–]jostler57 22 points23 points24 points 9 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

[–]CurtisAxelmania 20 points21 points22 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Basically yeah. Although in an even broader sense.

Cuckoos: kill your eggs, trick you into raising theirs

Cuckolded: your wife is impregnated by another man, you raise the children as your own without knowing

Cuckold fetishism: grossly misuses the term to represent guys who encourage their wives to sleep with other men. Completely ignores the root being about deception/childrearing.

Cucks: basically a.neogism used to insult people in the friend zone who solidify their place with pandering to women to the point of embarrassment. Becoming.tools, the implied assumption being the ones they pine for are opting to sleep with less pandering men.

This is at least somewhat closer to the root meaning than the fetish porn. The concept meaning a waste of resources toward something which does not benefit you but does benefit a competitor.

The strange thing about his this is currently so gendered (still yet to see women called cucks, would be investing) is that presumably it would be the mother bird who spends most of the time raising the cuckoo imposter.

[–]ajax1101 7 points8 points9 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

[–]jostler57 20 points21 points22 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]Muesli_nom 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Having an idea what other people think is generally not a bad thing. You don't have to agree with it, but going "Finger in your ears, lalala" only works as long as the people you are ignoring cannot affect you. I kept an eye on various subs whose focus I did not necessarily agree with before the last presidential election, and found myself in the position of going "Why is media so unilaterally calling it for Clinton, running with 90+ percentages of chances of her winning? I don't see it. For me, it's too close to call." And we all know how that went down.

Now, that doesn't mean I have to dig into such subs until my eyes bleed and my will to live fails me (certain subs manage to get me into rotten "that's it, no more reddit for today, humanity deserves to fail" mood in minutes...). But having a first-eyes glance about what people think saves me from having to trust someone else reporting it to me - and possibly horribly failing in that.

[–]iongantas 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]Badgerz92 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]neoman4426 5 points6 points7 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]Devi1s_Adv0cate -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

[+][deleted] 9 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]Jodasons87-4 points 9 years ago [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]Badgerz92 29 points30 points31 points 9 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

[–]Glitsh 5 points6 points7 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[+][deleted] 9 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]Badgerz92 6 points7 points8 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

[+][deleted] 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]Badgerz92 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]clown-penisdotfart 9 points10 points11 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]brazzledazzle 8 points9 points10 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]Herpinator1992 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]equiposeur 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[+][deleted] 9 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]Muesli_nom 4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]TheCoyPinch 15 points16 points17 points 9 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

[–]CurtisAxelmania 4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

[–]Smallpaul 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points8 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]tobasoft 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]CurtisAxelmania 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I take back vocabulary. Gay and Faggot have pre-homosexualerotic usage. To mock excessively burdensome or happy behaviors does not denigrate men attracted to men.

Not sure what you mean by liberals or traditionalist conservatives. Latter the "cuckservative" word? Denigrating panderers is fine to me.

I am fine with anyone using nigger. Context matters more than what a word is.

Substituting " n word" is exactly the kind of move that would fit the stereotype. So petrified of black violence you tiptoe around it. Why not just say "racial slurs"? What is so special about nigger that you can't say it but we don't use "k word" for like or "s word" for slick?

The problem is when we do namecalling to insult others. That is just as much a problem with things like "creep" or "deadbeat" or "mansplainer" or "misogynist" or "pervert". Or even "rapist" for that matter. Insults arent only a problem if inherently unfair, but also ones with useful applications if applied unfairly.

[–]Jodasons871 points 9 years ago [recovered] (2 children) | Copy Link

[–]tobasoft 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[+][deleted] 9 years ago* (7 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[+][deleted] 9 years ago* (6 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[+][deleted] 9 years ago* (5 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]rackmountrambo 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[+][deleted] 9 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]creamyfrog1 points 9 years ago* [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]jeff_the_nurse 23 points24 points25 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]Regnes 30 points31 points32 points 9 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

[–]Regnes 11 points12 points13 points 9 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] -2 points-1 points0 points 9 years ago* (5 children) | Copy Link

But she chooses to do her show.

If she were playing the fool in Shakespearean dramas, or had a job as a clown in a circus then, fair enough, I would accept the premise that she isn't the person she depicts.

But JJ is premised upon her entire career and personality. She's supposedly being a judge - supposedly the cases are real - supposedly the judgements are real. And she's constantly saying during the show how intelligent she believes herself to be, in spite of the pantomime that unfolds in her "courtroom"

And, on that basis, she's a buffoon, like I said, in a room full of bigger buffoons. There's no suggestion she is playing a part or that it's a fictional drama.

If she wanted me to believe that, actually, in spite of her show, she's an intelligent woman whose legal opinions have been thought through and should carry some weight, well, she's done the wrong fucking day job for 2 decades.

More to the point here, if she was a family court judge and felt that in that position she could have made use of gender-neutral posture in her decision making then wouldn't she have been better doing that for the past 20 years instead of making farcical television shows?

That alone suggests she's not very smart. Rich, perhaps, but not smart. How much was her credibility worth? Google suggests $45 million a year since 2010, so, yeah understandable perhaps.

But, there's a guy doing a UK version, who isn't a judge, he's a barrister but he at least manages to come across as an intelligent, erudite, reasonable and sane human being on the few shows I've watched. Maybe that wouldn't sell.

edit: Wikipedia suggests during her actual career "She earned a reputation as a "tough" judge (though she has disagreed with the labels "tough" and "harsh") known for her fast decision-making and acerbic wit." which to me suggests that the nonsense we see on TV isn't anything other than her true personality and dumb decision making based upon fuck all. "I think you're right and I'm the judge...so there!" and this quote is really telling men that it's not her fault Judge's are shit, it's their fault for not "getting it together"

[–]bulboustadpole 4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

[–]LethiasWVR 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[–]bulboustadpole 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]LethiasWVR 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Doesn't matter to me what you buy or not, but two members of my family were on the show, and unless their experience is a complete fabrication, they say it went down like this:
The defendant, who was in the middle of preparing an actual civil case related to her dog and a neighbor, received a letter in the mail from the studio saying basically
"Your case has been selected for a taping of Judge Judy. If you agree to appear, the studio will pay for the travel costs and accommodations for yourself and one guest/witness. The decision will be found in favor of the plaintiff, with damages in the amount of $X, which will be paid by the studio."
My aunt signed the thing, sent it back, and a few weeks later she and her sister were flying to CA with tickets purchased by the studio. When they got there, they were coached on how to act and some possible points to raise during the proceedings. The taping happened, everything played out, they came home.
Regarding the appeal you mention, just because something was decided before the taping does not mean that it is correct or that an appeal could not be won. If the decision is a legal ruling, then regardless of how or when it happened, it could be appealed. As far as I know, no part of the signed documentation forbids an appeal, and even if it did, I doubt that would hold up in court.
Regarding why people would fly out if the decision was already rendered, especially in the case you site, part of the agreement specified that they needed to be present for the taping in order to get any of the benefits, and I think it was probably a better deal to fly out on the studio's dime and appeal it later than it would have been to fight the whole case out of pocket, for either party.
In my aunt's case, I suspect for her it was a win/win. She could either stay home and fight the case in her own town with her own money, or she could have what she saw as a free weekend getaway to LA, skip out on all the court costs, and have the studio pay the damages instead of herself. Plus, if there's one thing I learned from their experience, it's that some people will do almost anything to be on TV.
Now all that said, it's possible that my aunt's "what's your dog doing on my lawn?" and similarly small cases are handled differently by the studio than something with higher stakes(you mentioned custody/visitation). I don't know anything about the case you cite, and literally everything I know about Judge Judy I know from the experience of my aunt relating the story of her experience, which happened about two years ago.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]CurtisAxelmania 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]cymrich 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]nocivo 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points9 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]Adynaton 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]jimmyvcard 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (15 children) | Copy Link

[+][deleted] 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]jimmyvcard 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[–]Jodasons871 points 9 years ago [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]Imnotmrabut 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[+]ducksontheground -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

[–]jimmyvcard 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

[+]ducksontheground -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

[–]jimmyvcard 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

[+]ducksontheground 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

[–]jimmyvcard 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

[+]ducksontheground 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

[–]jimmyvcard 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Goddamn you really don't get it. I said using "you cucks" as a way to get everyone together (the identified intention of the message) he fucked up his opportunity to reach a ton of people. The OP even responded to me in this thread agreeing with me. Take a look.

Do you not see the difference? One is marketing. You wouldn't say "buy nike faggot". You could. I don't think you'd be breaking laws, but you sure as shit aren't selling as many nikes as you could. You'd have Fucked up your opportunity.

You're clearly retarded if you can't see the difference here. Fucking retarded faggot cunt bitch. I am not policing language. That's kind of the point of using all these words to describe you, although they're ostensibly accurate. As for smart? I'm a licensed engineer. I passed the BAR exam for engineers. I can build bridges by law. Check my post history. If that's not smart, not sure what is. Tough? I mean I don't know if that's a word I'd use to describe myself but I'm an ex D1 athlete (also post history if you'd like) so I doubt you'd describe me as a pussy either. Lastly, the snowflake? I don't even get this. Do you think I'm a social justice warrior because I think OP missed an opportunity to have a very successful post with his poorly chosen words? I think you need to stop reading everything on The_Donald and assuming it's all real. I'm not even a democrat at all. I'll bet half my most controversial comments are calling them retards.

I really should stop responding but your lack of ability in basic reading comprehension is fascinating. Do you still not understand? I think my Nike analogy should work for anyone with a room temperature IQ.

[+]ducksontheground 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]jimmyvcard 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Goddamn you really don't get it. I said using "you cucks" as a way to get everyone together (the identified intention of the message) he fucked up his opportunity to reach a ton of people. The OP even responded to me in this thread agreeing with me. Take a look.

Do you not see the difference? One is marketing. You wouldn't say "buy nike faggot". You could. I don't think you'd be breaking laws, but you sure as shit aren't selling as many nikes as you could. You'd have Fucked up your opportunity.

You're clearly retarded if you can't see the difference here. Fucking retarded faggot cunt bitch. I am not policing language. That's kind of the point of using all these words to describe you, although they're ostensibly accurate. As for smart? I'm a licensed engineer. I passed the BAR exam for engineers. I can build bridges by law. Check my post history. If that's not smart, not sure what is. Tough? I mean I don't know if that's a word I'd use to describe myself but I'm an ex D1 athlete (also post history if you'd like) so I doubt you'd describe me as a pussy either. Lastly, the snowflake? I don't even get this. Do you think I'm a social justice warrior because I think OP missed an opportunity to have a very successful post with his poorly chosen words? I think you need to stop reading everything on The_Donald and assuming it's all real. I'm not even a democrat at all. I'll bet half my most controversial comments are calling them retards.

I really should stop responding but your lack of ability in basic reading comprehension is fascinating. Do you still not understand? I think my Nike analogy should work for anyone with a room temperature IQ.

[–]Pathfinder24 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]Mallago 4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[–]TheLonelySnail 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]Glitsh 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]TooMuchToProcess 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]Silvystreak 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[–]McFeely_Smackup -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]UDT22 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]d3ntalfl0ss 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[+]AnotherDAM -10 points-9 points-8 points 9 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

So, let me get this straight. Both houses of Congress in the US have an Ethics Committee because it looks REALLY bad when the DoJ or FBI come in and clean house for them. It is really a sham, but hey, at least they are doing something.

Similarly the Judiciary is supposed to police its own - independent branch of government and all.

But somehow Judge Judy has decided it is MY fault that family courts which the Supreme Court fully sanctioned as acting as Courts of Equity and not Courts of Law somehow became corrupt as fuck???

Talk about passing the buck. Yes, we could in theory stage a revolt, but you can guess how that will work out. If major corporations and Attorneys General cannot clean up the Eastern District of Texas - Federal do you REALLY think "Dads" can "get it together" and clean up family court?

[–]Badgerz92 8 points9 points10 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]AnotherDAM 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]ThirdTurnip 4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

[–]AnotherDAM 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

[–]ThirdTurnip 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

[–]AnotherDAM -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

[–]ThirdTurnip 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

[–]AnotherDAM -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[–]ThirdTurnip 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]AnotherDAM -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]MRmandato -3 points-2 points-1 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[–]GEAUXUL 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]MRmandato -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]roharareddit -3 points-2 points-1 points 9 years ago* (9 children) | Copy Link

I have seen this quote before and I think that both Judge Judy and the person who used the word "cuck" in the title are blissfully unaware that there have been groups such as the National Parenting Organization (formerly Fathers and Families) that have been working for years to rectify the problem with family and divorce courts.

There are two things at play here. One is that there is an entire establishment comprised of lawyers and gender ideologues who are hell bent on removing fathers from the lives of their children that has been in operation for decades now and has the full weight of the state behind it. Secondly, there is the tradcon factor that says if you are a man you should act like one and if you dare complain about how you got screwed in family court than it is an indication that you didn't have enough game when dealing with your ex or that you are just a whiny little bitch (cuck) for having your kids stolen from you.

Every time I see the word "cuck" in this sub I think of a man sporting a mullet and a small penis who thinks that just by calling other men who have had their lives ripped apart by this establishment "cucks" that he is more of a man than they. "If you weren't such a 'cuck' this would never have happened!" As if they have some sort of magic about them that immunizes themselves from the institutional discrimination against men and fathers. They will accomplish nothing.

[+][deleted] 9 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]roharareddit 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

[–]Jodasons872 points 9 years ago [recovered] (6 children) | Copy Link

[–]ButtermanJr 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]roharareddit 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

[–]Jodasons872 points 9 years ago [recovered] (3 children) | Copy Link

[–]roharareddit 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[–]Imnotmrabut 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]roharareddit 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[+]deathdragon5858 -25 points-24 points-23 points 9 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

[–]Mallago 15 points16 points17 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[+]deathdragon5858 -30 points-29 points-28 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]roharareddit 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[–]deathdragon5858 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]roharareddit 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Title	Judge Judy has spoken. Get it together, you Cucks.
Author	Jodasons87
Upvotes	712
Comments	162
Date	April 23, 2017 10:31 PM UTC (9 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/67574k/judge_judy_has_spoken_get_it_together_you_cucks/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/judge-judy-has-spoken-get-it-together-you-cucks.924522 https://theredarchive.com/post/924522

Comments