TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

      • /r/AllPillDebate
      • /r/AlreadyRed
      • /r/altTRP
      • /r/AntiFeminists
      • /r/askFDS
      • /r/askMRP
      • /r/askRPC
      • /r/becomeaman
      • /r/BlackPillScience
      • /r/Chadfish
      • /r/Divorce_Men
      • /r/EverydayMisandry
      • /r/ExRedPill
      • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
      • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
      • /r/GEOTRP
      • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
      • /r/MalePsychology
      • /r/Male_Studies
      • /r/MenSupportMen
      • /r/MGTOW2
      • /r/MuslimRedPill
      • /r/newTRP
      • /r/PussyPass
      • /r/PussyPassDenied
      • /r/RedPillBooks
      • /r/RedPillParenting
      • /r/RedPillWives
      • /r/RedPillWomen
      • /r/RedPillWorkplace
      • /r/RPChristians
      • /r/seduction
      • /r/ThankTRP
      • /r/TheRedPillStories
      • /r/trpGAME
      • /r/TRPOffTopic
      • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
      • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

      • Artful Prudence
      • A Voice for Men
      • Alpha Game
      • Black Label Logic
      • Caleb Jones
      • Captain Capitalism
      • Corporate Machiavelli
      • Days of Game
      • Deep Strength
      • Dicipres
      • Donal Graeme
      • Female Misogynist
      • Free Northerner
      • Gaming My Wife
      • Good Looking Loser
      • Hawaiian Libertarian
      • In Mala Fide
      • KillToParty
      • Kill Your Inner Loser
      • Krauser PUA
      • LaidNYC
      • Married Man Sex Life
      • NO MA'AM
      • Omega Virgin Revolt
      • Pook's Mill
      • Random Xpat Rantings
      • Red Pill Theory
      • Red Pill Wifery
      • RedPillDad
      • RedPillDoctor
      • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
      • Sigma Frame
      • The Feminine Woman
      • The Futurist
      • The Masculine Principle
      • The Modern Man
      • The New Modern Man
      • The Obsidian Files
      • The Power Moves
      • The Private Man
      • The Red Pill Room
      • The Red Quest
      • The Rules Revisited
      • The Spearhead
      • Troy Francis
      • Wintery Knight
      • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

This like... really bad

BlueCorg

September 16, 2018
2071 upvotes
/r/MensRights
https://i.redd.it/m0n6me7ztim11.jpg
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title This like... really bad
Author

BlueCorg

Upvotes 2071
Comments 243
Date September 16, 2018 3:37 AM UTC
(7 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/9g7mjt/this_like_really_bad/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/this-like-really-bad.893996
https://theredarchive.com/post/893996

Comments

[–]WhateverWhateverson 101 points102 points103 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Excuse me WHAT THE FUCK? THAT WOMAN RAPED A MINOR! She raped an underage kid, any male would get several years in prison for this kind if shit, no matter If the victim "consented" or not. This shit is just ridiculous. Women think they are discriminated against yet the whole system is literally biased in their favor

[+]mineturtle90001 points 7 years ago [recovered] (63 children) | Copy Link

"Performed oral sex" that's flat-out rape

[–]BirdLaw51 139 points140 points141 points 7 years ago (16 children) | Copy Link

The more profane and explicit you make it, the more grotesque and disgusting it sounds. Nobody says "performed oral sex". But if you use the vulgar language we typically use to describe these acts, and include it was a 14 year old, people would lose their shit.

[–]ziggmuff 181 points182 points183 points 7 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link

"Slutty 25 year old teacher in the Bronx sucked her 14 year old students dick - still gets to teach there"

[–]DrShocker 47 points48 points49 points 7 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

Couldn't they describe it as "25 year old teacher in the Bronx has sexual relationship with underage child."

[–]-Master-Builder- 112 points113 points114 points 7 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Teacher rapes student, keeps teaching license.

[–][deleted] 24 points25 points26 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

this

[–]crnext 13 points14 points15 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yes, send it.

[–]CardMechanic 11 points12 points13 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Teach teachers not to rape.

[–]hackersaq 12 points13 points14 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

female teacher rapes student, keeps teaching license

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

“Child rape- no jail time”

[–]gbBaku 13 points14 points15 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Love how genderless this phrasing is. I wonder if people who defend this discrimination would be outraged by this title, or would they immediately assume that the teacher is a woman, thus making the title not outraging at all?

[–]akamustacherides 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

They let you know the boy is a teen so that you might be ok with it because you know all boys dream of being molested.

[–]Talska 11 points12 points13 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

It was a 14 year old girl, but fucking hell if it was a male teacher who did it there would be calls for execution

[–]akamustacherides 7 points8 points9 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

The male teacher would be looking at 20 years, registering as a sex offender, and a life of trying to survive because what kind of job will he be able to get? She will do her probation, keep on teaching, and marry a dude that won't concern himself with her past.

[–]Casual_OCD 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

and marry a dude that won't concern himself with her past.

She'll marry a pedophile and they'll prey on children together

[–]crnext -1 points0 points1 point 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Slut teacher giving head for extra credit, gets caught. Slapped on wrist for not challenging students enough.

Let me guess.... Slut shaming am I right? Back in my day we'd pick up stones and stone the ho.

[–]WiseMonkeyGoodMonkey 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Honestly at this point the Judge that let her off is more deserving of punishment. Unseated and disbarred for that travesty at a minimum. Nobody needed to die here, but she should have gone to jail for a very long time.

[–]Goddamnedengineer 7 points8 points9 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

They also use the word “performed” which is a synonymous word to “gave” in this context. She gave oral sex. She gifted the boy. She didn’t harm him.

Imagine if a grown man “performed oral sex on a 14 year old girl”.

[–][deleted] 17 points18 points19 points 7 years ago (30 children) | Copy Link

So this this the confusing thing..what is considered sexual assault vs “rape”? Because I’ve seen a lot of people call oral sex rape, rather than sexual assault.

Wouldn’t this be considered sexual assault rather than rape? If the roles were reversed, did the man rape the girl or sexually assault her?

I’m not condoning rape and sexual assault, Both are terrible. But it seems like sometimes there’s confusion between what is actually rape and sexual assault

[–]loganblade14 23 points24 points25 points 7 years ago* (19 children) | Copy Link

gg

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points8 points 7 years ago* (18 children) | Copy Link

So what they’re referring to is statutory rape and not “adult” rape. I guess when it’s a kid it’s a little different.

Even so, I’ve seen people say that an adult male was “raped” by receiving oral, even though there wasn’t any penetration, rather than saying he was sexually assaulted. So that’s why I say there seems to be confusion sometimes what people consider rape vs sexual assault.

All of it’s horrible either way at that end of the day.

[–]loganblade14 14 points15 points16 points 7 years ago* (4 children) | Copy Link

gg

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

They have a separate law for underage, and it's not the same penalty as forced rape.

[–]TracyMorganFreeman 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Correct, because it's a statutory crime. It's like speeding or a DUI. The act itself is the crime, regardless of harm done.

[–]hackersaq 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Did any authority figures ever ask you to do something you didn't want to do when you were a child, and you did it without screaming and fighting back?

Statutory rape is forced rape. An adult can force a child to do something with words alone.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Dude, I'm talking about the actual law. It's a separate law whether you approve or not. If you think I'm incorrect, then you are free to look it up. Never mind, i did it for you. If you scroll down you will see that's it's a class D felony.

https://www.criminaldefenselawyer.com/resources/new-york-statutory-rape-laws.htm

[–]Reptilian_Brain_420 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link

There was oral penetration and it was forced on one of the parties who was too young to legally consent. It is rape.

[+]duhhhh -6 points-5 points-4 points 7 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

The victim was not penetrated so it does not count as rape. Q: Why are virtually all "rapists" men? A: Because they are the sex with the outie genetalia, so male sexual offenders are likely to penetrate their victims.

[–]Reptilian_Brain_420 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

No, the reason virtually all "rapists" are men is because of the specific definition of rape.

Unwanted sexual activity that is forced (coerced) is the issue. Regardless of innies and outies.

[–]duhhhh 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Unwanted sexual activity that is forced (coerced) is the issue.

Q: Why aren't ~50% of rape victims male and ~40% of perpetrators women? A: Because of the specific definition of rape. There is a double standard in what counts as rape. Hence this boy (like most male victims of women) is not counted as a rape victim.

[–]Reptilian_Brain_420 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Which basically makes the term rape meaningless.

[–]duhhhh 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

No. Misleading rape stastistics are 1) a big career/money maker 2) are used to promote the idea that women are better than men 3) evidence of "rape culture". They are a powerful propaganda tool.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

You are so much part of the problem and you don't even realize it.

[–]duhhhh -1 points0 points1 point 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

If you don't understand what counts as rape in the stastics and you think men are the problem based on those statistics you are very much part of the problem and you don't even realize it. With a gender neutral definiton of rape, males would be about half of rape victims each year. The actual definition is NOT gender neutral and you don't seem to realize it.

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

The statistics are worded, which is a very important part of law, by feminists. This is a situation in which you either don't know how/why you're putting your foot in your mouth, or you're choosing to do so. The definition, as you pointed out, IS NOT GENDER NEUTRAL, Let's start there, shall we?

[–]duhhhh 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Ok. The definition is not gender neutral. The under the current sexist definition this boy is not counted as a rape victim because he was not penetrated. Do you disagree? if you do, can you please find a reputable source that counts envelopment as rape.

[–]duhhhh 12 points13 points14 points 7 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

Rape is penetrating the victim vaginally, orally, or anally against their will. So if a woman penetrates a man against his will, she is a rapist. This is a huge double standard designed to make men rapists and not women. With a gender neutral definition of rape men are about half the victims and women are about 40% of the perpetrators.

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points9 points 7 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

So then technically, a woman can’t “rape” a man unless she penetrates him anally. Otherwise a woman giving a man oral against his will isn’t rape, its sexual assault

What would you consider a gender neutral definition of rape? What would we then consider sexual assault vs actual rape?

[–]duhhhh 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

What would you consider a gender neutral definition of rape?

Nonconsensual sex. It shouldn't matter if the victim was penetrated or enveloped.

What would we then consider sexual assault vs actual rape?

Manual stimulation. This is why Brock Turner is not a rapist.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Well, isn’t that pretty much what rape is now? Penetration vaginally, anally or orally.

That would still mean that a woman giving a man non consensual oral wouldn’t be rape, it would be manual stimulation since she isn’t penetrating him. Making it sexual assault. But if the man made her give him non consensual oral then he just raped her because he penetrated her orally..if she gives him a non consensual hand job that isn’t rape, but if he fingers her then it is rape..

Man this is kinda complicated

[–]duhhhh 18 points19 points20 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

It has intentionally been made complicated.

This is the official FBI info for standard rape reporting in the US. I suggest you read it all yourself because there is lots of selective quoting and misinformation is out there.

https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2013/crime-in-the-u.s.-2013/violent-crime/rape

https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2013/crime-in-the-u.s.-2013/rape-addendum/rape_addendum_final

For statistical reporting rape is carefully defined as forced penetration. There is a very influential public policy making feminist professor Mary P Koss that explains that a woman raping a man isn't rape. Hear her in her own voice explain it isn't traumatic for the victim if they are not penetrated - https://clyp.it/uckbtczn. I doubt you will, but I encourage you to listen to what she is saying.

She is considered the foremost expert on sexual violence in the US. She is the one that started the 1 in 4 college women is sexually assaulted myth by counting all sorts of things the "victims" didn't. A man misinterpreting a situation going in for a kiss and then backing off when she puts up her hand is a sexual assault on a woman. As you hear in her own words above, a woman drugging and riding a man bareback is NOT sexual assault according to her - the woman's studies professor and trusted expert that literally wrote the book on measuring prevalence of sexual violence.

You see she really was instrumental in creating the methodology most (including the US and other government agencies around the world) use for gathering rape statistics.

Detecting the Scope of Rape : A Review of Prevalence Research Methods. Author: Mary P. Koss. Journal of Interpersonal Violence Volume: 8 Issue: 2 Dated: (June 1993) Page: 206

Although consideration of male victims is within the scope of the legal statutes, it is important to restrict the term rape to instances where male victims were penetrated by offenders. It is inappropriate to consider as a rape victim a man who engages in unwanted sexual intercourse with a woman.

She is an advisor to the CDC, FBI, Congress, and researchers around the world and promoting the idea that men cannot be raped by women. There was a proposal to include forced envelopment in the latest FBI definition to rape by she and NOW lobbiests successfully blocked it. She has many many followers and fellow researchers that follow her methodology and quote her studies. That is where most people get the idea rape is just a man on woman crime. Rape has been carefully defined as penetrating the victim. Men are fairly rarely penetrated and it is almost always by another man.

Most people talking about refer to the "rape" (penetrated) numbers as influenced by Mary Koss's methodologies, but the CDC also gathered the data for "made to penetrate" (enveloped) in the 2010 and 2011 NISVS studies.

The 2011 survey numbers: https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/ss6308a1.htm

an estimated 1.6% of women (or approximately 1.9 million women) were raped in the 12 months before taking the survey.

and

The case count for men reporting rape in the preceding 12 months was too small to produce a statistically reliable prevalence estimate.

vs

an estimated 1.7% of men were made to penetrate a perpetrator in the 12 months preceding the survey

and

Characteristics of Sexual Violence Perpetrators For female rape victims, an estimated 99.0% had only male perpetrators. In addition, an estimated 94.7% of female victims of sexual violence other than rape had only male perpetrators. For male victims, the sex of the perpetrator varied by the type of sexual violence experienced. The majority of male rape victims (an estimated 79.3%) had only male perpetrators. For three of the other forms of sexual violence, a majority of male victims had only female perpetrators: being made to penetrate (an estimated 82.6%), sexual coercion (an estimated 80.0%),

So if made to penetrate happens each year as much as rape then by your assumed definition of rape then men are half of rape victims. If 99% of rapists are men and 83% of "made to penetrators" are women ... then an estimated 41.5% of rapists in 2011 were women.

But since made to penetrate is not rape, the narrative is that men are rapists and women are victims and boys/men that are victims are victims of men.

And before you think that was just one study, it wasn't.

2010 survey results - https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/cdc_nisvs_ipv_report_2013_v17_single_a.pdf

Scientific American - https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/sexual-victimization-by-women-is-more-common-than-previously-known

data revealed that over one year, men and women were equally likely to experience nonconsensual sex, and most male victims reported female perpetrators. Over their lifetime, 79 percent of men who were “made to penetrate” someone else (a form of rape, in the view of most researchers) reported female perpetrators. Likewise, most men who experienced sexual coercion and unwanted sexual contact had female perpetrators.

And...

A recent study of youth found, strikingly, that females comprise 48 percent of those who self-reported committing rape or attempted rape at age 18-19.

The Atlantic - https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2016/11/the-understudied-female-sexual-predator/503492/

a 2014 study of 284 men and boys in college and high school found that 43 percent reported being sexually coerced, with the majority of coercive incidents resulting in unwanted sexual intercourse. Of them, 95 percent reported only female perpetrators.

And...

National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions found in a sample of 43,000 adults little difference in the sex of self-reported sexual perpetrators. Of those who affirmed that they had ‘ever forced someone to have sex with you against their will,’ 43.6 percent were female and 56.4 percent were male.”

Time - http://time.com/3393442/cdc-rape-numbers

when asked about experiences in the last 12 months, men reported being “made to penetrate”—either by physical force or due to intoxication—at virtually the same rates as women reported rape (both 1.1 percent in 2010, and 1.7 and 1.6 respectively in 2011).

In other words, if being made to penetrate someone was counted as rape—and why shouldn’t it be?—then the headlines could have focused on a truly sensational CDC finding: that women rape men as often as men rape women.

"Rape culture" is not a one sided issue. Neither is domestic violence. Domestic violence data is similar with the genders reversed. Statistically both men and women say women are slightly more likely to initiate and escalate domestic violence than men, but we need more DV support for women and less for men because men (and only men) need to be taught that violence against women (and only women) is wrong.

[–]sixdicksinthechexmix 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Would be better with a couple sources. /S No but really this is excellent. It's unfortunate that you only have a few upvotes but thank you, I learned something.

[–]duhhhh 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

thank you, I learned something

That is far more meaningful karma to me. Call out the misleading comments elsewhere. Males can be and often are victims of women too.

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

So then technically, a woman can’t “rape” a man unless she penetrates him anally. Otherwise a woman giving a man oral against his will isn’t rape, its sexual assault

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Bruh, "made to penetrate" was FINALLY established into law less than 15 years ago.

[–]Metraxis 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The UCR defines rape as any sexual part entering any orifice, to any degree ("no matter how slight') if someone involved doesn't/can't consent. The victim is not the owner of the orifice, but the person who doesn't consent. So yes, oral sex counts.

[–]imtinyricketc 11 points12 points13 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Bronx teacher Pedofile rapist.

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

No, that's technically under 13 in most states

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Technically sexual misconduct with a minor. Actually a different law then forced penetration. Some states the penalty is pretty severe, others tend to overlook it.

Now if he was one year younger (13), that would've been pedophile. Which in my state carries a worse penalty then forced rape.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

https://www.criminaldefenselawyer.com/resources/new-york-statutory-rape-laws.htm

Read down. Oral is class D felony.

[–]saicho91 -1 points0 points1 point 7 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

what if the boy wanted that? its not rape anymore. what she did is still wrong but i dont think its rape

[–]nforne 3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Statutory rape is still rape.

[–]saicho91 -2 points-1 points0 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Rape is a type of sexual assaultusually involving sexual intercourse or other forms of sexual penetration carried out against a person without that person's consent

this is the first defenituon of rape on google that you get and it say---- against a person without that person's consent

so like i said if the 14years old was consent to it, it was not rape.

what the teacher did is still wrong and i dont think she should keep teaching but people here seem to not understand what rape is

[–]nforne 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

And if you googled statutory rape...

Statutory rape is defined as sexual contact with an individual who is below the legal age of consent. This law usually refers to adults engaging in sexual activity with minors. There are many different terms, all of which can refer to statutory rape - sexual assault, rape of a child, corruption of a minor, and many others.

[–]saicho91 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

oh well, i just learn something new.. thanks i guess haha

never heard the word statuory because i dont really know that word in french

[–]crnext -3 points-2 points-1 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

stop beating around the bush

She was probably rubbing right down the middle of it, TBT.

[+]mod_these_nuts1 points 7 years ago [recovered] (3 children) | Copy Link

Lol getting your dick sucked at any age isn’t rape.

[–]nforne 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Would you feel that way if it was a male teacher sucking your kid's dick?

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Oh come on man, it’s clearly meant that if it’s a woman. I’m just looking at it from the kids perspective, not his cuck dad’s (your) perspective.

[–]nforne 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

My perspective should be apparent from the board we're on. Female teachers who fiddle with children should get the same sentences as male teachers who fiddle with children.

Just because you get a boner when the perp is a woman doesn't mean she's committed any less of a crime.

[–]mikeym364 142 points143 points144 points 7 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

So wrong. And if that was the other way around, the guy would be a registered sex offender for life.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

She will be too most likely

[–][deleted] 12 points13 points14 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

They let registered sex offenders be teachers in New York?

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Out of this whole case, that's what baffles me the most. We can argue what the laws are and whether or not the punishment fits the crime all day.

But to put her back in a classroom? Wtf!?

[–]nikdahl 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

She is now a Level 1 Sex Offender, which means low risk of reoffense, and she'll be off the list in 20 years.

[–]mikeym364 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

A sex offender is a sex offender. Shouldn't be a time limit on it. It should be for life.

[–]enriceau 45 points46 points47 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

"Pedophile teacher rapes boy but doesn't get jail time."

[–]TheFakePlant 4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This is the correct title.

[–]draggin_balls 78 points79 points80 points 7 years ago (21 children) | Copy Link

Someone should post this to a mainstream sub but make the thumbnail a pic of a man, would be an interesting experiment...

[+]Cherrypiebackup1 points 7 years ago [recovered] (13 children) | Copy Link

Someone use this

[–]HMS_Drake 32 points33 points34 points 7 years ago* (11 children) | Copy Link

I’m genuinely going to try this out. brb

Edit: Holy shit it's number 2 on the front page of r/Iamatotalpieceofshit

[–][deleted] 8 points9 points10 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

keep us updated

[–]HMS_Drake 5 points6 points7 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

hang on what sub should I post it to?

[–]Cynax-nolife 11 points12 points13 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

/r/feminism?

[–]SageBus 3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

waiting for results, for science....

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Just found it and upvoted. Def interested to see how it pans out

[–]karamd 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

!remindme 2days

[–]HMS_Drake 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

check out r/Iamatotalpieceofshit, title: 'Justice Served' The comments are actually smarter than I expected.

[–]sneakpeekbot 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Here's a sneak peek of /r/iamatotalpieceofshit using the top posts of all time!

#1: This fucking piece of shit. | 703 comments
#2: Terrible woman | 2055 comments
#3: Definition of a “total piece of shit”. | 1251 comments


I'm a bot, beep boop | Downvote to remove | Contact me | Info | Opt-out

[–]Cynax-nolife 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Give post link

[–]HMS_Drake 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

sure hang on

​

https://old.reddit.com/r/iamatotalpieceofshit/comments/9g9ven/justice_served/

[–]epelle9 6 points7 points8 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Shouldn’t the picture be of a real rapist? You know to not give a innocent person the reputation of being a rapist. I think this sub specifically should really care about that.

[–]epelle9 4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Real good social experiment, I just don’t know if it’s fair for the guy who will be put in the picture, as some people will now label him as a rapist even if he didn’t do anything.

[–]FrenchFryNinja 4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Just use a picture of a convicted rapist.

[–]epelle9 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Exactly what I was thinking and commented to a guy that responded to the same comment I responded to.

[–]PMmeYOURrareCONTENT 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Use Photoshop to combine/change up/distort various faces/make a fake face.

[–]Cynax-nolife 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

!remindme

[–]RemindMeBot 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Defaulted to one day.

I will be messaging you on 2018-09-17 13:03:52 UTC to remind you of this link.

CLICK THIS LINK to send a PM to also be reminded and to reduce spam.

Parent commenter can delete this message to hide from others.


FAQs Custom Your Reminders Feedback Code Browser Extensions

[–]Shoziwankanobi 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

!RemindMe

[–]Akesgeroth 90 points91 points92 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

/r/pussypass is that way ------>

[+]rapidliquid1 points 7 years ago* [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link

*"Bronx teacher who raped 14 year old evades serious charges due to gender"

[–][deleted] 8 points9 points10 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

And husband being a sheriff's deputy

[–]Prtyvacant 14 points15 points16 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I had a lawyer friend explain it. They copped a plea with her because they didn't have a strong enough case for a conviction.

It's likely it was a he said she said thing and there was no real evidence, or the kid's family just didn't want him to testify.

Downvote me to oblivion if you want, but my lawyer friend is about as MRA as you get and he saw the reasoning behind it.

[–]GeneralDogsbody 14 points15 points16 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Rape is a performance now apparently. A round of applause, please.

[–]DragonCeaser217 10 points11 points12 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Must have sucked off the cops and judge too...

[–][deleted] 26 points27 points28 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Again, women are above the law.

I don't know what it takes for people to realize this, I mean we literally had feminists demanding women never go to jail for anything.

[–]Saoirse_Laochra 7 points8 points9 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

While I agree that this would've been a much bigger story if the teacher had been a male... This is also a 'New York's Education System sucks' thing.

We're the state that had 'rubber rooms', where teachers accused of felony crimes -including attempted murder, rape, and sexual assault -legally couldn't be fired, so instead they were sent to these 'rubber rooms' where they sat around, and played on their phones, or read books all day, while still collecting their normal paycheck.

It also speaks to the larger problem of, why the hell aren't we paying more attention to this? According to one national survey, of children in grades 8-11, 3.5 million students reported being having had physical, sexual contact with an adult at school, most often a teacher, or coach. That number shot up to 4.5 million when researchers added in things like, 'looking at porn', 'exhibitionism', and 'voyuerism'.

Everybody makes a huge deal out of the Catholic Church priest scandal -and they should, no one's arguing that. But we've jumped on that as the worstest of the worst, and most awful thing... But teachers are out there sexually abusing children at a rate of -according to numerous researchers -between fifty and one hundred times more often than priests, and nobody says a peep about it.

[–]BlueCorg 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

That’s terrible. Can you link the study I’d like to read more about it

[–]binrobinro 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Type "teachers rubber rooms" into google

[–]5th_Law_of_Robotics 3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Remembered feminists are aware of this situation (the massive bias in favor of women) and are still calling for reducing the number of women in prison and decriminalizing non violent crimes (like this) for women.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I wonder when this kids Me Too moment is going to happen, oh wait, Me Too is only for females I guess.

[–]njullpointer 4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

for some reason they locked the /r/news thread about this. maybe there was some issues understanding how the headline should've been more like 'pedophile rapist child abuser keeps teaching license because of pussy pass'

[–]mikesteane 21 points22 points23 points 7 years ago (16 children) | Copy Link

This would be like a doctor mutilating the penis of a minor and then being allowed to keep his licence to practice.

[–]AllwaysHard 8 points9 points10 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

They are paid to perform circumcisions and we allow it as a society

[–]mikesteane -3 points-2 points-1 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Whether it is actually legal or not is a moot point. It certainly seems to contravene assault laws as well as international human rights agreements. The fact that it has gone unpunished for generations would seem to make it legal.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Now tell me how you feel about dismemberment of children, capable of feeling pain, being legal simply because they have not left the womb

[–]mikesteane -1 points0 points1 point 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's a bad thing to do and the later it gets the worse it is. However, bringing unwanted babies into the World is probably worse.

[–]AKnightAlone 11 points12 points13 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

This would be like a doctor mutilating the penis of a minor and then being allowed to keep his licence to practice.

To be fair, mutilating the penis of an infant should actually be punished much worse than consensual sexual activities with someone that's old enough to have sexual desires.

[–]mikesteane 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I agree. It is far, far worse. That is my point: people are making an issue of this teacher when doctors are routinely and openly doing far worse.

[–]thepowerofone2 -1 points0 points1 point 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Which sadly does still happen

[+][deleted] -6 points-5 points-4 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Jews make sure it happens

[–]myspamhere 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Just looked at your post history. You said the holocaust did not happen. You do know it was extremely well documented by the Germans themselves

[–]BoringGenericUser 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Oh wait...

[+]kobrahawk1210 -7 points-6 points-5 points 7 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

I don't understand why everyone is so against circumcision. I wasnt, got the procedure done, and it is way better. Easier to clean, less risk of tearing during sex... There are no downsides unless it's done poorly. They've been proven to help prevent STDs and UTIs. Uncircumcised children are also more prone to penile cancer down the road. And women can even have a higher chance of getting a UTI from sex with someone not circumcised if they haven't thoroughly cleaned recently.

Do some research and talk to a real doctor, or better yet multiple, before you just write it off as "genital mutilation." As someone that wasn't, I wish I had been. No one needs to experience their foreskin tearing ffs.

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=http://rnprivee.com/2018/02/25/circumcise/&ved=2ahUKEwiazMqbur_dAhW8CDQIHZdKAOUQFjAAegQIAxAB&usg=AOvVaw2oDM2wgEBMVNj5184dPf7I&cshid=1537098705305

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.thebump.com/a/circumcised-vs-uncircumcised-new-studies-add-to-the-debate/amp&ved=2ahUKEwiazMqbur_dAhW8CDQIHZdKAOUQFjADegQICBAB&usg=AOvVaw2zYqN4zMjkKqBsXiqDGqHV&ampcf=1&cshid=1537098705305

[–]mikesteane 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

The great majority of "real" doctors as you put it, do not think that infant circumcision can be justified. The US may be a special case here, but then it's a pretty weird country generally.

There are no downsides.

You are the one who needs to get educated about this.

Even the links you provide give the game away about the profit motive. Your first link, which is obviously trying to push the process, while pretending to be neutral, says "health officials still do not have enough data to recommend routine circumcisions." How many millions of circumcisions are needed to get the data? Why is this data not being gathered? And why do so adults voluntarily have the operation done?

Your second link is also an attempt at pretending to be neutral while pushing an agenda. And they give the game away in the last paragraph: "Despite the findings, the AAP still says the choice to circumcise is ultimately up to the parents. They do suggest, however, that expecting parents should speak with their child’s doctor about the benefits and risks of the procedure, and discuss who will perform the circumcision." They do not want to be responsible for the decision, but they will grab all the business that's going.

[–]BoringGenericUser 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

There are no downsides

Wrong.

[–]Atheist101 4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Easier to clean,

Do you not know how to take a god damned shower/bath properly? What are you, a neanderthal?

less risk of tearing during sex...

Thats not a thing

They've been proven to help prevent STDs and UTIs

Use a fucking condom like a civilized person. Jesus christ reddit...

[–]SchalaZeal01 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

and don't forget penile cancer, which changes (possibly) your lifetime risk from 0.001% to 0.0008%. You probably risk getting the lottery jackpot more often in your life.

[–]MahouShoujoLumiPnzr 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

How about this? Your preferences shouldn't dictate what irreversible alterations you make to my genitals without my consent. Fucking listen to yourself.

[–]Lunatic_Cheshire_Cat 4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I wonder, if a male teacher would do the same thing (performing oral sex with a female 14-year-old student), could his lawyer refer to that case so his punishment would be the same?

[–]BlueZir 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Can we just post an article like this next time there is a high profile rape case by a man?

Play it down real nice, call it "performed intercourse on unwilling woman" then pull these examples out when people start demanding blood for not using extreme enough language.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I feel like we see way to many of these to have to still argue.. any time I try to bring up this issue with anyone they claim the cases are too few and far in between, but that’s clearly not the case. It’s at the point that I feel like i need to create an album of news articles and headlines just to show how common this bullshit is.

[–]ItsJustTheory 4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Nicee

[–]Ob1kUnoLi 4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Nice

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

How did she keep her teaching license?

[–]binrobinro 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Cute girl - male judge

[–]Vanriel 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

They always do this. It's always stuff like " The teacher was in a relationship with the student" if the teachers a woman, but flat out say it was rape if the teachers a man.

Its bloody well the same thing! It's Rape. Sexual Assault. How more bloody clear can it get?

[–]D0ct0rAnus 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If she was a black dude it would be a very different headline.

[–]JohnMorrisEquality 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I like to add to this.i know its seperate but.there is hope. A woman in the uk was given life for being the leader of one of the biggest pedo rings in british history. Also a nurse is under investigation for killing 17 babies.when found guilty she will be the most prolific baby killer in british history. So 2 women break records that us men are so bad at...

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Got a link to the story? This sounds so crazy.

[–]RedForman- 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Link to this news article please? I cant go off a screenshot.

[–]BlueCorg 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

here you go

[–]ChaosOpen 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

10 years probation? That seems like institutionalized racism against her. /s

[–]CatManDontDo 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Lucky kid, where were the teachers like this when I was in school hurr hurr. /s

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

For everyone crying rape, let's look at the actual law.

https://www.criminaldefenselawyer.com/resources/new-york-statutory-rape-laws.htm

Criminal sexual act in the second degree is a Class D felony and includes oral or anal sexual contact between a defendant who is at least 18 years old and a minor who is younger than 15, unless the defendant is less than four years older than the victim. Penalties include up to seven years in prison. (N.Y. Penal Law § 130.45 (2018).)

It's a class D feleony, which is why her sentence was reduced. Why she is still allowed to teach completely baffles me however

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Wonder if she'll home school

[–]HeckingDoofus 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

my high school has a huge pedophile problem. within the 4 years ive been there have been 3 arrests charged for just that. last year one of my favorite teachers got arrested for it. and just last week my now favorite teacher (because my favorite teacher quit last year) resigned for unknown reasons and its speculated by kids at school she was quitting before they could get her in trouble for something. however i DM’d her the other day and she totally denied all of that and i believe what shes told me. she said she resigned because the school board has had it out for her since july when she was the only person to stand up for our then principle and defend her at her hearing (she was being fired because they were blaming her for the school being total shit. and she told me that since then the school boards been “trying to find any way to get her fired so she quit before they could ruin her career like they did principle smith.” anyways (to relate this to mens issues) two cases of the pedophilia at my school are the male jrotc senior chief allegedly having sex with a female student. the second being a female science teacher who allegedly had sex with a male student. in the case of senior chief the whole school got creeped out by this coming to light and him being arrested, and everyone totally believed the man was guilty. however, when the science teacher got arrested everyone was shocked by the news, and a lot of kids were saying shit like “#FREEMRS____ SHE DIDNT DO SHIT” and a lot of people were joking about the whole situation, which wasnt the case with senior chief, well as it turns out over a year after he was arrested he was found not guilty of any charges, however his career was still ruined and his reputation will never be where it once was. the science teacher on the other hand even though everyone was saying she “didnt do shit” or to free her, well she DID do shit and she was found guilty and is currently serving time. but everyone still loves her...

TL;DR: an example from my life where sexism causes no one to take female pedophilia seriously but when its a man his life is ruined even if he really didnt do anything. (also i ranted about my school seemingly being run by a fucking pedophile ring)

[–]LiveTheTruth321 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

When I first saw this, I wondered how she would get a nother teaching job. What's the advantage of keeping her certificate when she is already known to fuck a student?

Was she fired?

[–]lowsodiummonkey 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Can’t the parents of these kids file civil lawsuits against the women that do this crap?

[–]McKimS 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

No requirement to be on the sex offender registry either, huh?

Nothing to see here, obviously no gender-based discrimination here...

[–]goodmod[M] 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

The title of your post does not say enough about its subject. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible.

If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable.

So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people.

When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with every detail. Then check if there are any words you can cut out without losing any important information.

[–]BlueCorg 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Sorry about this, I don’t mean to inconvenience anyone, I’ll do better on the future. Should I take it down? Change the title?

[–]goodmod 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

No, just remember for future reference. :)

[–]Redditor005050 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Some times something is better then nothi g

[–]BlueCorg 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah, in these times it’s almost a victory she even got probation

[–]OurChoicesMakeUs 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I saw this same post somewhere else and almost every comment from a male was something along the lines of "who told on her? Who cares? Why ruin it for everyone else?"

This shit is awful, and it should be called what it is, rape.

But some of the comments here are blaming women for getting a pass and being above the law like she was the judge and jury. When a lot of men are completely okay with a "female rapist" because sex, why not. Not every man is for mens rights and equality, and not every woman thinks this is okay or preferable, I like this sub but I feel like the overall conversation is turning into "Women! Fuck em all!" Which is exactly what you all hate about modern feminists.

[–]BlueCorg 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The amount of men saying he’s lucky and should enjoy it is disheartening.

[–]thesupersoap33 -1 points0 points1 point 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I wish a teacher would've given me a blowjob at around 17. That's when I hit puberty.

[–]Doyler92 -1 points0 points1 point 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Lucky kid. I'd like to get her to perform oral sex on me.

[+]VoidSentry10332 -9 points-8 points-7 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Damn where are all these Teachers at my school

[–]Lulzmaster4350 5 points6 points7 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You really want to get raped?

[+]Chicksan -8 points-7 points-6 points 7 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

No, she shouldn't be teaching anymore, but lets be honest, that kid was having the time of his life!

[+]reddiTORvillan1 points 7 years ago* [recovered] (5 children) | Copy Link

If the genders where reversed and it was your daughter / niece? Would you think the same?

[–]Chicksan -5 points-4 points-3 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

If the roles were reversed, no I would not think the same, but they weren’t, so I stand by my original commment

[+]jvrodrigues -6 points-5 points-4 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

And that's why the consequences or a male teacher doing it to a female student should be much more severe than the opposite.

[–][deleted] -3 points-2 points-1 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I know it's a double standard but if this happened to me at 14 it'd be like a dream come true. Idk if a 14 year old girl who lost her hymen and risked getting pregnant by an older man would think the same

[+]RopedPrick -11 points-10 points-9 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

14 year old get more action than me

Pass me the rope am done

[–][deleted] -3 points-2 points-1 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

But...she’s a girl....

But...she’s hot...

Nice.....

[+][deleted] -18 points-17 points-16 points 7 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

For everyone throwing out, "She raped him, she raped him!" here is the definition of rape...

r/https://www.justice.gov/archives/opa/blog/updated-definition-rape

I'm not saying any of this was right, especially the resulting punishment, but at most she performed oral copulation and lewd and lascivious acts with a child which are both serious crimes, but not "rape".

[–]Matthew_1453 5 points6 points7 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

This literally says oral sex without consent (which he couldn't give) is rape, thanks for backing us up with proof

[–]Uhh_Political 9 points10 points11 points 7 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Did you miss this?

or oral penetration by a sex organ

It literally says that forced oral sex is rape. You should also take care to read the text after that because it specifically says that the definition was designed so that it doesnt matter whose thing is going in, only which person can't consent.

This is rape by the definition YOU provided.

[–]duhhhh -3 points-2 points-1 points 7 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

oral penetration by a sex organ of another person, without the consent of the victim

You believe what you were told to believe and not what is written. I completed the quote and bolded the part you didn't see. The boy was not penetrated by another persons sex organ, so he is not counted as a rape victim.

[–]Uhh_Political -2 points-1 points0 points 7 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

You clearly didn't think very hard here.

Sex organ: kid's dick.

Oral penetration: women's mouth.

Consent: no.

The part you're not seeing is that the kid is the "other person." It's only saying other to refer to someone other than the one getting penetrated. The women is the one getting penetrated. This law is specifically designed so that it can work both ways (penetrating vs penetrated).

[–]duhhhh 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

You seem to (think you) understand a lot more about this than I do. Please rebut what I posted here.

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/9g7mjt/this_like_really_bad/e62oewn/

[–]Uhh_Political 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

No. That would be a waste of my time.

The definition you provided requires 3 things for oral rape: sex organ, oral penatration, and lack of consent. It does not say that the penetrator must be the rapist.

What you linked to is talking about something else entirely. It's no secret that scumbags are out there trying to make this a sexist issue. Regardless, the fact remains that she did not right the law. I'm not here to argue about her. I'm here because of a law.

Your definition shows that boy was raped. If you want to debate the legitimacy of your source or about that girl we must first end this. 1 thing at a time.

[–]duhhhh 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Your definition shows that boy was raped.

He was raped. He does not count as a rape victim because he was not penetrated by someone elses genitals.

[–]Uhh_Political 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

He was the one who penetrated.

The definition doesn't say the penatrator can't be the victem.

[–]Lulzmaster4350 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Just reverse the rolls and see what it will be called then

[–]duhhhh 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Thr ignorance of what is counted as rape gives people the idea that rape is a overwhelmingly male perpetrated crime. You are correct.

[+]toketokensen -6 points-5 points-4 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Are we all going to pretend that if that bitch cane up to any straight 14 year old male and offered to suck his dick you wouldn't take it? Come the fuck on. Shes hot, he's 14. Really?

[–]BlueCorg 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It doesn’t matter what you would do in this situation, she’s taking advantage of a minor, that’s the problem.

[+]beerhiker -7 points-6 points-5 points 7 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

As a once 14 year old male, I would not have objected. I know the move to fight the double standard, but still...

[–]Lethn 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

How does your personal opinion and what you would do justify it exactly? It doesn't, the funny thing is you're even acknowledging the double standard and you're still trying to make a dumb comment.

[+]Cat_Man_Nic1 points 7 years ago* [recovered] (4 children) | Copy Link

It’s a very popular personal option among 14 year old straight males.

[–]Lethn 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Again, still doesn't justify it does it? At best, she abused her teaching position, at worse she's taking advantage of guys. Forget about the psychological aspect of things for a moment. If it was a girl most people saying this about guys would be screeching rape and calling for blood and what would happen if this woman was a total moron and got herself pregnant?

Adding to that there's the whole issue of favouritism we've all heard the classic of girls getting laid with teachers for grades. Whose to say boys won't do the same thing?

While I don't buy into the hysteria quite as much as some people especially in regards to girls because I know what teenage girls were like when I was in school. It's really simple, even if it's all consensual the moron should still lose her teaching position because it's an abuse of her position but people are so fucking arrogant about all of this I doubt change like that will come easily.

I'm afraid attitude's like yours are a classic example of what I'm talking about and I'm somebody who's pretty casual about the whole issue of sex, these women would all be regarded as predators if they were men, no question about it.

[+]Cat_Man_Nic1 points 7 years ago* [recovered] (2 children) | Copy Link

Hey now buddy, calm er down. All I said is sleeping with hot teachers is something almost every 14 year old dreams of.

I agree that the teacher should lose her teaching license, I agree that her reputation should be destroyed, I agree that she could have caused permanent psychological damage and I agree that what she did is criminal.

[–]Lethn 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

The problem is people almost always use that line to try and justify what women like her do and frankly I have a theory that these women target teenagers who don't know any better because men avoid them and for a good reason.

[+]TheMythof_Feminism -50 points-49 points-48 points 7 years ago (89 children) | Copy Link

How old is this "teacher".....? she looks like she's 16 but maybe I'm just getting old.

Anyway, I guess this is where I have to take a few downvotes because I once again have to be the voice of reason surrounded by a bunch of socialist clowns...

The woman in this instance performed oral sex on the teenager, a 14 year old. This is absolutely a crime, however the implication that this is on the level of , say, a male teacher having sexual intercourse with a 14 year old girl, is absolute nonsense. This was several orders of magnitude less and her sentence, while too lenient in my opinion, was not unreasonable.

If she had sexual intercourse with him, that's another story.... but she didn't. Again, she got too much leniency in my opinion, but not unreasonably so.

If the argument is about the "teaching certificate" that would depend on where this happened , when it happened, etc. . Being a professor myself (part time) ... unlike the rest of you, I know that it is not as simple as implied here and there is a lot that comes into play. Basically I would need to know more details and context before making a determination....

Note that the type of trash on display in the OP is disappointingly similar to feminist/SJW content, I urge you not to adopt it.

[–]BlueCorg 23 points24 points25 points 7 years ago (39 children) | Copy Link

I don’t get why a women having sexual intercourse with a boy is any different that the same situation with the roles reversed. Neither minors can legally give consent, so both cases should be qualified as rape and treated equally

Maybe I didn’t understand you? Feel free to elaborate.

[+]TheMythof_Feminism -32 points-31 points-30 points 7 years ago (38 children) | Copy Link

I don’t get why a women having sexual intercourse with a boy is any different that the same situation with the roles reversed.

Serious question, do you truly believe men and women are the same?

​

If yes, you are wrong and/or mentally ill. If no, your argument is refuted.

[–]BlueCorg 13 points14 points15 points 7 years ago (22 children) | Copy Link

So you really think that it’s a less of a problem to rape a man than a woman, I don’t get you

[–]olaus86 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Don't even bother responding to this dude. He's constantly trying to reply with a demeaning choice of words if you don't agree with him.

[+]TheMythof_Feminism -25 points-24 points-23 points 7 years ago (20 children) | Copy Link

Answer the question;

​

Do you believe men and women are the same?

​

If you are going to pretend like I have not prompted you directly once again, you are dismissed and a complete waste of time.

[–]BlueCorg 9 points10 points11 points 7 years ago (19 children) | Copy Link

I don’t believe men and women are the same. Now please answer my question

[+]TheMythof_Feminism -13 points-12 points-11 points 7 years ago (18 children) | Copy Link

I don’t believe men and women are the same.

Then your argument is refuted in its totality.

Men and women are not the same and to pretend otherwise is pure unadulterated insanity.

you really think that it’s a less of a problem to rape a man than a woman

I don't remember ever making that argument.... nice strawman though.

My argument was very clear, this woman got too much leniency , but not unreasonably so. I would rather see men get this level of leniency than brutalize women the way men are.... in any case, this is NOT the same as a "man raping a woman" , whatever that is supposed to mean.

This is a lesser crime and to argue otherwise is to be wrong. It is truly mind blowing that people in this subreddit are trying to pretend otherwise.... again, this absolutely is a crime and there is no doubt about that, but not all crimes are the same and context matters .

You socialists are becoming indistinguishable from the feminists/SJWs.

[–]BlueCorg 15 points16 points17 points 7 years ago (15 children) | Copy Link

I posted something about a women getting off practically Scott free for a crime against a boy

You said it’s not as big of a deal because it was a crime against a boy. That wasn’t a straw man

I recognize the difference in men and women. That doesn’t mean that the crimes they commit should be judged differently.

It’s unreasonable leniency to rape a child and still be able to teach children.

I’m sorry if your arguments are just too advanced for me but I guess I just can’t understand them

[–]TheMythof_Feminism -3 points-2 points-1 points 7 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link

You said it’s not as big of a deal because it was a crime against a boy.

Quote where I said "It's not as big of a deal because it was a crime against a boy" . C'mon, show me where I said that. Oh that's right, I never said such a thing; Strawman argument noted and dismissed.

While a simple minded individual (I.e. socialists) could possibly think that that is the takeaway, that is a simplistic, and incorrect understanding of a more complex concept. Yet again, it's called CONTEXT .

I'm gettnig tired of socialists with their nonstop fallacious bullshit.

It’s unreasonable leniency to rape a child

/rolleyes

What part of "CONTEXT" is going over your head?

[–]BlueCorg 11 points12 points13 points 7 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

I’m not sure how to quote things on reddit because I’m rarted so I copied it. Here goes

“However the implication that this is on the level of a male teacher having sexual intercourse with a 14 year old girl is absolute nonsense”

Hmmmm seems like you did kind of say it

Your rebuttals haven’t exactly been satsfying. Calling me a socialist and a waste of time because I disagree with you is annoying

Stop commenting this shit on topics of boys being molested. It’s creepy and you seem like an asshole

I’m not going to respond to your stuff anymore. Your IQ to big and I’m making a fool of myself

I’m tired

Gn

I love you

P.s. I don’t need context to say rape is bad

[+]neightdog1 points 7 years ago [recovered] (2 children) | Copy Link

You're an idiot

[–]throwaway030586 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

This is rape and she should be punished in the same manner as another rapist. You can try to muddy the water here with ridiculous semantics but you can't change the basic facts. She raped a boy. He could not consent. She should be punished just like other rapists.

Men and women are different. Fair and equal are not the same. I'll give you all that. This women is a rapist though. No ambiguity about it. She should be punished severely for it.

[–]TheMythof_Feminism -1 points0 points1 point 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That's a nice throwaway account.

​

[–]nuclearcatpotatoe[🍰] 5 points6 points7 points 7 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link

Holy fucking shit. Men and women should be treated equally.

Give me one reason why one should be treated higher then the other, one reason one should be treated less than the other, give me one god damned fuck of a reason that one sex is not to be given the same legal treatment as the other.

[–]TheMythof_Feminism -5 points-4 points-3 points 7 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link

Men and women should be treated equally.

On what grounds?

Do you believe men and women are the same? if not your argument is garbage, if yes, you are mentally ill.

​

Give me one reason why one should be treated higher then the other

I don't remember ever having made that argument. Maybe try addressing the actual points I made next time, little one.

​

give me one god damned fuck of a reason that one sex is not to be given the same legal treatment as the other.

Easy, because men and women are not the same.

Again if you think otherwise, you are mentally ill.

[–]nuclearcatpotatoe[🍰] 7 points8 points9 points 7 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

men and women are the same. While there are differences biologicaly and neurologicaly, they are the same. Just like black people and white people are the same. Just like jews, and christians, and muslims, and athiests. We are all the same. Why are we the same? Because we are human. and that is what joins us. we are the same.

[–]TheMythof_Feminism 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

men and women are the same.

You are mentally ill.

Men and women are not the same, this isn't an opinion, this is a hard axiom that is not subject to debate.

men and women are the same

there are differences

men and women are the same

there are differences

10/10..... /s

[–]nuclearcatpotatoe[🍰] 3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Why dont you actually answer my other god damn reply and not hide mate. cmon, would it be that hard to move those neckbeard arms to the mouse and hit new tab, find the article and show why it contextially isnt a real bad of a crime?

[–]TheMythof_Feminism -2 points-1 points0 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Why dont you actually ans...

I have zero interest in anything you say.

On the plus side, complete fools like you have forced me to lower my standard of what to expect from people on reddit. Congratulations.

gg.

[–]nuclearcatpotatoe[🍰] 8 points9 points10 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

the why the fuck ya replying mate?

[–]AloysiusC 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

give me one god damned fuck of a reason that one sex is not to be given the same legal treatment as the other.

Easy, because men and women are not the same.

Being the same is not a requirement for having the same legal status. Men and women are also not the same within their demographics. In fact, I challenge you to find a difference between men and women that's universally true for all people but isn't a difference between different men/women within their respective demographic that would justify a different legal status for the sexes.

[–]TheMythof_Feminism -1 points0 points1 point 7 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Being the same is not a requirement for having the same legal status.

"Legal status" is not at play here.

In how many ways do I have to directly prompt you socialists that CONTEXT MATTERS? is it really going over your head ...? it's not complicated.

Men and women are also not the same within their demographics.

Who gives a fuck about demographics. It does not matter.

I challenge you to find a difference between men and women that's universally true for all people

Easy; Men can inseminate women, but cannot gestate an embryo.... women have the physiological ability to perform the incubating function during the gestational process. Even in damaged women, the physiological aspect is still a significant difference.

Your position is indefensible.

that would justify a different legal status for the sexes.

"Legal status" is irrelevant.

We're talking about reality.... well I'm talking about reality... you seem to have zero understanding of it.

[–]AloysiusC 5 points6 points7 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

"Legal status" is not at play here.

It is in the question of legal treatment that you answered above.

Who gives a fuck about demographics.

You did when you wrote "because men and women are not the same." Men and women are demographics.

Easy; Men can inseminate women

Not all men. I said "universally true for all people". Small piece of advice: you should not be so quick to call tasks "easy" - especially if you fail at performing them. It kind of backfires pretty hard :D

Even in damaged women, the physiological aspect is still a significant difference.

Let's flesh this out because it's quite literally the only thing you said that remotely approaches an attempt at a sound argument. So what exactly is that difference? How is it true for all people and how does it justify different legal treatment?

"Legal status" is irrelevant.

I'm just responding to your statement about legal status. Crying "irrelevant" doesn't absolve you from responsibility for your own words.

[–]TheMythof_Feminism -1 points0 points1 point 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

legal treatment

"Legal status" and "legal treatment" are not the same thing. Not to mention what is being discussed is neither of those.

We're talking about the evaluation of a case performed by jurisprudence. I.e. CONTEXT. That thing that your type appears unable to understand.

You did when you wrote "because men and women are not the same." Men and women are demographics.

Demographic : "A particular sector of a population. "

Want to try again ? maybe this time try to present something of merit even? humans are a sexually dimorphic species. The distinctions between the sexes are not a matter of opinion and are axiomatic. None of this is opinion.

Not all men.

Yes, all men, 100% no exceptions...... since you are being wildly disingenous, I have no problem playing your bullshit outlier games. So go ahead, try to forward your premise through dishonesty and see how that works out for you.

I said "universally true for all people"

It is universally true for all people. Bar none, no exceptions.

your statement about legal status.

I'm impressed, for a socialist you are performing your obfuscation quite well.

In any case, the above quoted is a combination strawman argument, red herring and non sequitur. Not your garden variety socialist bullshit, it is a bit more refined than normal.

In any case, you appear to have absolutely nothing of substance to present.... and that is obvious, you are arguing against reality and thus, your only move is to spew empty rhetoric and get refuted over and over again, gg.

[–]AloysiusC 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

"Legal status" and "legal treatment" are not the same thing. Not to mention what is being discussed is neither of those.

Legal treatment is literally what you responded to. So yes we are discussing it. Legal status is a more general term but feel free to stick to "legal treatment".

Demographic : "A particular sector of a population. "

So men and women are not a sector of a population? Very well, cross out the word "demographic" and replace it with "subset of the population". Like above, the argument stands either way.

Yes, all men, 100% no exceptions

No. Definitely not. Otherwise artificial insemination wouldn't be needed, not to mention multiple other reasons why a man might not be able to do that.

you are arguing against reality

Lol. I'm arguing that people don't have to be the same in order to have the same legal treatment. And that "against reality, gg". Thanks for the entertainment :D

[–]BoringGenericUser 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Demographic : "A particular sector of a population. "

Like, say, men and women.

[–]BlueCorg 12 points13 points14 points 7 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

Oral sex on a child is still fucking despicable, and even if you don’t want to hold it to the same heights as normal sexual intercourse it’s still rape

[+]TheMythof_Feminism -10 points-9 points-8 points 7 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

Oral sex on a child is still fucking despicable

What's your point? who is arguing otherwise?

​

Oh that's right, no one. You fail.

[–]BlueCorg 7 points8 points9 points 7 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

You’re arguing it’s not as big of a deal

[+]TheMythof_Feminism -8 points-7 points-6 points 7 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

You’re arguing

​

Stop you right there, little leftist, my argument is that context matters. Your argument is to act like a brain-addled simp, disregarding reality in favor of your nonsense.

​

What the woman did was absolutely a crime, and she got too much leniency, but to pretend what she did was the same as an actual rape, I.e. sexual intercourse proper, is to be wrong and delusional.

[–]Operator216 8 points9 points10 points 7 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

You accused someone of a strawman but all you do is strawman. You're a fuckin' idiot.

Edit: Don't reply cause I won't read it. I've wasted enough time on you already.

[+]TheMythof_Feminism -6 points-5 points-4 points 7 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

You accused someone of a strawman but all you do is strawman.

The difference between a fool and someone making logical arguments is that if you are going to accuse someone of a logical fallacy, you indicate exactly where such a thing occurred.

A fool will just name-drop a fallacy thinking that's an argument, it isn't. It is a desperate appeal to authority, epic fail.

[–]nuclearcatpotatoe[🍰] 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

your arguments have as much logic as unwritten code, empty of any form of thought or processing.

[+][deleted] -6 points-5 points-4 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Fuckin little fag boy here hides behind paragraphs see how you’d do I real fight fucking bitch

[–]nuclearcatpotatoe[🍰] 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

i know that the guy above is a cunt, but i feel required to drop an r/iamverybadass here. Sorry mr neuro.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

No apology needed, my comment was very /iamverybadass style just damn that guy is really condescending :/

[–]Standard_Rules_Apply 4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

because I once again have to be the voice of reason surrounded by a bunch of socialist clowns...

Careful there, your narcissism is showing.

Dismissed

[–]TheMythof_Feminism -3 points-2 points-1 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

your narcissism is showing.

It would only be narcissism if I were wrong.

I am not and the responses to this proved my point several times over. Yawn, your desperate attempt is refuted and dismissed.

[–]Standard_Rules_Apply 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's interesting how you fulfill the definition of narcissism almost inconceivably well.

Narcissistic personality disorder — one of several types of personality disorders — is a mental condition in which people have an inflated sense of their own importance, a deep need for excessive attention and admiration, troubled relationships, and a lack of empathy for others. But behind this mask of extreme confidence lies a fragile self-esteem that's vulnerable to the slightest criticism.

A narcissistic personality disorder causes problems in many areas of life, such as relationships, work, school or financial affairs. People with narcissistic personality disorder may be generally unhappy and disappointed when they're not given the special favors or admiration they believe they deserve. They may find their relationships unfulfilling, and others may not enjoy being around them.

Treatment for narcissistic personality disorder centers around talk therapy (psychotherapy).

Symptoms

Signs and symptoms of narcissistic personality disorder and the severity of symptoms vary.

People with the disorder can:

• Have an exaggerated sense of self-importance

• Have a sense of entitlement and require constant, excessive admiration

• Expect to be recognized as superior even without achievements that warrant it

• Exaggerate achievements and talents

• Be preoccupied with fantasies about success, power, brilliance, beauty or the perfect mate

• Believe they are superior and can only associate with equally special people

• Monopolize conversations and belittle or look down on people they perceive as inferior

• Expect special favors and unquestioning compliance with their expectations

• Take advantage of others to get what they want

• Have an inability or unwillingness to recognize the needs and feelings of others

• Be envious of others and believe others envy them

• Behave in an arrogant or haughty manner, coming across as conceited, boastful and pretentious

• Insist on having the best of everything — for instance, the best car or office

At the same time, people with narcissistic personality disorder have trouble handling anything they perceive as criticism, and they can:

• Become impatient or angry when they don't receive special treatment

• Have significant interpersonal problems and easily feel slighted

• React with rage or contempt and try to belittle the other person to make themselves appear superior

• Have difficulty regulating emotions and behavior

• Experience major problems dealing with stress and adapting to change

• Feel depressed and moody because they fall short of perfection

• Have secret feelings of insecurity, shame, vulnerability and humiliation

When to see a doctor

People with narcissistic personality disorder may not want to think that anything could be wrong, so they may be unlikely to seek treatment. If they do seek treatment, it's more likely to be for symptoms of depression, drug or alcohol use, or another mental health problem. But perceived insults to self-esteem may make it difficult to accept and follow through with treatment.

If you recognize aspects of your personality that are common to narcissistic personality disorder or you're feeling overwhelmed by sadness, consider reaching out to a trusted doctor or mental health provider. Getting the right treatment can help make your life more rewarding and enjoyable.

Causes

It's not known what causes narcissistic personality disorder. As with personality development and with other mental health disorders, the cause of narcissistic personality disorder is likely complex.

Narcissistic personality disorder may be linked to:

• Environment ― mismatches in parent-child relationships with either excessive adoration or excessive criticism that is poorly attuned to the child's experience

• Genetics ― inherited characteristics

• Neurobiology — the connection between the brain and behavior and thinking

Risk factors

Narcissistic personality disorder affects more males than females, and it often begins in the teens or early adulthood. Keep in mind that, although some children may show traits of narcissism, this may simply be typical of their age and doesn't mean they'll go on to develop narcissistic personality disorder.

Although the cause of narcissistic personality disorder isn't known, some researchers think that in biologically vulnerable children, parenting styles that are overprotective or neglectful may have an impact. Genetics and neurobiology also may play a role in development of narcissistic personality disorder.

Complications

Complications of narcissistic personality disorder, and other conditions that can occur along with it, can include:

• Relationship difficulties

• Problems at work or school

• Depression and anxiety

• Physical health problems

• Drug or alcohol misuse

• Suicidal thoughts or behavior

Prevention

Because the cause of narcissistic personality disorder is unknown, there's no known way to prevent the condition.

However, it may help to:

• Get treatment as soon as possible for childhood mental health problems

• Participate in family therapy to learn healthy ways to communicate or to cope with conflicts or emotional distress

• Attend parenting classes and seek guidance from therapists or social workers if needed

Source: https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/narcissistic-personality-disorder/symptoms-causes/syc-20366662

It's never too late to seek treatment.

dismissed

again

[–]Jex117 9 points10 points11 points 7 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Stop trying to normalize pedophilia.

[+]TheMythof_Feminism -8 points-7 points-6 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Stop trying to normalize pedophilia.

"This is absolutely a crime"

​

"Stop trying to normalize pedophilia"

​

Put the booze down and sleep it off man, you are way out of it.

[–]Jex117 12 points13 points14 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I see you posting these disgusting comments every time another female pedophile gets caught raping a young boy.

Stop trying to normalize pedophilia.

[+]TheMythof_Feminism -7 points-6 points-5 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I see you posting these disgusting comments

Yawn.

​

If they are wrong in any way, make the counter argument, little one. You are a waste of time.

[–][deleted] 8 points9 points10 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That condescending asshole shtick is for what exactly?

[+]rapidliquid1 points 7 years ago* [recovered] (24 children) | Copy Link

She should have the same charges as a male teacher would if he ate out a female student. Many years in jail, rovocation of the teaching license, and being a registered sex offender.

[–]TheMythof_Feminism -3 points-2 points-1 points 7 years ago (23 children) | Copy Link

Disregarding for now your Tabula Rasa nonsense.....I'm not sure about "many years in jail" but I would agree on revocation of the teaching license, provided the context indicates she was in violation of established protocol. Yes to the sex offender registry.

I believe this woman was given too much leniency... however I do not believe that a teacher eating a female student out would lead to what you are suggesting. In fact, I am unsure but, isn't that not even classified as rape of any type in the U.S.?

Ah. Here we go;

Rape in the United States is defined by the Department of Justice as "Penetration, no matter how slight, of the vagina or anus with any body part or object, or oral penetration by a sex organ of another person, without the consent of the victim"

It does not appear that it would fall under the purview of this definition. I have no idea how the law would treat it, but I can safely say it would NOT have an equivalent sentence if the sexes were reversed, your tabula rasa argument is noted and dismissed.

[+]rapidliquid1 points 7 years ago* [recovered] (2 children) | Copy Link

I never said rape. I am talking about sexual assault of a minor. Your argument is noted and dismissed.

[–]TheMythof_Feminism -3 points-2 points-1 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I never said rape.

That's cute but irrelevant.

Your core premise was tabula rasa in nature; The notion that humans are all "the same" but are "programmed" through social interactions. Such a notion is complete bullshit in every regard.

I am talking about sexual assault of a minor.

Bzzzt, shifting the goalposts.

You had not made such an argument before this. Do not pretend otherwise.

Your argument is noted and dismissed.

Good lord, if you are going to attempt an ironic echo, you need to do a lot better than just ineptly adding a random aspect of a comment to the end of yours. It has to make sense.... but what I am talking about, you probably have no understanding of logic and reason to begin with.

​

gg'd

[–]BoringGenericUser 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

provided the context indicates she was in violation of established protocol

Wha...when is it not in violation of established protocol to rape your students?!

[–]TheMythof_Feminism 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

when is it not in violation of established protocol to rape your students?

Rape in the United States is defined by the Department of Justice as "Penetration, no matter how slight, of the vagina or anus with any body part or object, or oral penetration by a sex organ of another person, without the consent of the victim.

It seems your argument is complete nonsense.

Perhaps you wish to reconsider your position?

[–]BoringGenericUser 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

It seems your argument is entirely based off a sexist legal definition.

[–]TheMythof_Feminism -1 points0 points1 point 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

sexist

So your argument is that the Department of Justice is "sexist"? LOL?

Well at least your nonsense was amusing.... dismissed.

[–]BoringGenericUser 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

As you so like to say, nice strawman.

[–]TheMythof_Feminism 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

As you so like to say, nice strawman.

Nope.

You are free to pretend that that's the case though, I don't mind.

[–]berserkerrage 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link

Your argument is completely without merit as this is not the law. It is a definition only primarily used as a way of tracking crime statistics. However, your complete and utter ignorance is noted and dismissed as per usual

[–]TheMythof_Feminism 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link

Your argument is completely without merit as this is not the law.

Yeah I guess THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE is totally irrelevant here /s

It is a definition only primarily used as a way of tracking crime statistics.

That's nice, completely irrelevant.

We can go state by state and my point will remain solid. People like you however, are spectacularly wrong.... your type seems to be completely unable to understand a point of principle.

[–]berserkerrage 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago* (11 children) | Copy Link

Except most, if not all, state's law make exceptions for situations of a person in a "position of power". I'm spectacularly right. You don't know shit here.

Edit: Minimum age of consent in the US is 16 so your point is completely irrelevant. Just stop trying to justify rape by women you feminist/SJW.

[–]TheMythof_Feminism 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

Except most, if not all, state's law make exceptions for situations of a person in a "position of power"

Pretty sure that is completely wrong and utterly nonsensical.

You may be conflating an aggravant or alternative circumstance with a functional cause........ also, lol? I googled a couple of states to see if that was true. Unless I am very lucky and got the ones that do not have this so-called "exception" or your bullshit has been detected.

People with your level of confirmation bias are a complete waste.... and if you REALLY want, we can go word for word, but know that your argument is utter garbage and is entirely without merit.

[–]berserkerrage 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

You're completely wrong here doesn't matter what you want to say here. 16 is the lowest age of consent in the US. This was a 14 year old. Get over it. You want to justify rape by women.

[–]TheMythof_Feminism 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

You're completely wrong

Nope. I double checked and it appears your statement was complete bullshit, or perhaps you just didn't understand the law.

This was a 14 year old.

.... are you mentally ill? my opening comment specifically said "This is absolutely a crime".

The point is that not all crimes are equal.... wow, I may have overestimated you.... gg.

[–]berserkerrage 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Please, this is rape. Stop trying to downplay it.

[–]nuclearcatpotatoe[🍰] 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

rape is rape. If you believe that one is worse then the other, then you are being sexist. And yes, sexism is a two way street.

[–]TheMythof_Feminism -4 points-3 points-2 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

rape is rape.

Actually no. There is something called CONTEXT.

How can other adults be making such idiotic arguments without any irony or facetiousness...? context isn't some high level , ephemeral concept.... even a child knows what context is. In my opinion, this is one of the biggest problems the MRM has. People like you that spew absolute garbage on a regular basis and undermine actual comptent arguments deriving from the movement.

If you believe that one is worse then the other, then you are being sexist.

Nope. You're just a dumbass.

[–]nuclearcatpotatoe[🍰] 5 points6 points7 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

With the context that was provided in the image, the current evidence goes to show that this was not a fair sentence. IF you believe that im wrong, find the original paper, and show that what im saying is horse shit and that the context really makes the woman much less a criminal.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter