https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/15/style/sugar-dating-seeking-arrangement.html

Ms. Fowles (https://static01.nyt.com/images/2018/10/12/style/16SUGARDATING14/oakImage-1539370703152-superJumbo.jpg?quality=90&auto=webp) arrived in August 2017. For all the excitement of moving to New York City, she ended up sharing a three-bedroom apartment with two other roommates across the Hudson River, in Jersey City, N.J. She got a retail job at a clothing store in Midtown that paid her $15 an hour and a commission of 1.5 percent of her sales. The cost of living (and partying) was more than she could manage, along with her $25,000 in college student loan debt.

She signed up on SeekingArrangement.com, a website that helps people interested in monetized dating find each other. Sugar daddies (and some sugar mommies) pay monthly fees of $99 a month, which allows them unlimited access to the profiles of sugar babies, who join the website for free. The website is illustrated by stock photos of white women, sometimes carrying shopping bags and often in formal gowns and diamonds, fawning over white men with business-trip suitcases and carefully groomed 5 o’clock stubble. It includes a section on “hypergamy,” or what used to be known as marrying up.

“He was Jewish, so we had to go to kosher places,” she said. Without any prior discussion, he would hand her $200 or $500. There was no sex.

Then there was another man who took her to dinner in Midtown, after which they got a room at the CitizenM hotel. (He liked that hotel, she said, because you can book a room online and then check in at an unmanned electronic kiosk.) “It was very natural and it felt like a normal hookup, except he gave me money after,” she said. Nine hundred bucks, to be precise.

In March, Ms. Fowles decided she needed a regular allowance coming from a regular arrangement. She went back onto the site and soon received a message from a man who said his name was Jay and that he was an investment banker at Bain.

Ms. Fowles didn’t have the PayPal app on her phone. So she downloaded it, and then Ron showed her how to request payment for $2,500 (including the cost of the hotel room and the blowouts). He then pulled out his phone, said he was accepting the request as he tapped away at his screen.

It wasn’t until she got on the subway and looked at PayPal that she saw her payment request had been ignored.

The women started Googling. They quickly found that the man had been an employee of City Hall and was now a student in a New York University program that is in Brooklyn, near the Jay Street-MetroTech subway stop.

Still, Ms. Fowles has washed her hands of sugar-dating, hoping to pursue a career in personal styling. And she makes no apologies for her experience.

“Women are stigmatized and seen as repulsive and worthless when using their bodies to support themselves,” she said. “I was in a tough place financially, and I am O.K. with my decisions. Women have sex with vile men all the time so why shouldn’t we be paid for it if we choose? I don’t deserve to be shamed for it, or scammed because of it.”

I found the last paragraph particularly interesting. To me, it suggests that men viewing prostitutes as unappealing and repulsive is a grave injustice enacted on women. However, I think many women too consider selling their bodies to vile men a repulsive act. Another day, another entitlement piece from the NYT about how men should value prostitutes as appealing partners at best and not repulsive at least.

I don't believe the stigma will ever expire on prostitution as long as women themselves find sleeping with vile men repulsive. Furthermore, why wouldn't men/women consider the women who sleep with "vile" men equally as "vile?" It appears that we find it difficult to divorce the concept of finding someone repulsive as a partner with their value in society. Respected professionals are strongly correlated with appealing partners and so, for as long as we consider prostitutes sub-optimal partners, we will respect them less as members of society. Even in countries with legalized prostitution, the stigma remains and is even described as growing.

https://www.amsterdamredlightdistricttour.com/news/interview-with-ex-prostitute-metje-blaak/

Stigma is what is worst. Women who want to quit prostitution, who want to do something else, find it hard to do so. I have seen that children had to leave the daycare-center because their mother was a prostitute. No, I think it is becoming worse. In the past, being a prostitute wasn’t very accepted either, but now with the internet anyone can say anything. Now, you get to know what people really think and do. Someone in his attic can just bully as much as he or she likes.

Q4Men: Do you find prostitutes repulsive and worthless (as partners and/or as members of society)?

Q4All: Do you think the stigma against sex work is an injustice and will / should it ever expire?

General discussion on the article and pseudo-prostitution.