Does it follow logically that if pick-up art works, and works well when correctly done, then the idea that "all women are like that" is given credence?

In other words, it is obvious the nuances of individuals make them unique, but if a pick-up plan can be used effectively on the vast majority of women, does it not follow that AWALT is a reasonable attitude in TRP?

A helpful analogy might be in boats. There are all types of shapes and sizes, colors, propulsions, and purposes for boats. Yet, they all (are designed to) float, they all hold people and cargo, they tend to sink when flooded or the hull is breached, you can repurpose boats for multiple jobs, and assumptions can be made reliably about them based on what they share in common - I submit the same can be said about women, and indeed humans as a whole.

I've found many feminists and BP thinkers completely reject the notion of AWALT on principle, but it doesn't seem like this idea has been given any time for debate. It occurs to me that AWALT ought not to be rejected as a reference if there is truth to it, regardless of whether it is offensive.