What do you ladies mean when you say that? I mean, I, as a man, prefer chubbier women. Thick thighs and muffin-tops are perfectly fine. Would it mean that I have no standards if I'd also be attracted to the woman who weighs one-hundred and twenty pounds and expresses her interest? Similarly, a woman's race or ethnicity is a non-factor in whether I'll date or sleep with her. 'Attractive' doesn't belong to a certain skin-tone, in my opinion. What about the fact that I and many other men, I'm sure, would date that cute Barnes 'N Noble employee that likes the Wheel of Time series just as soon as we'd date a psychiatrist with their own practice?

I don't know. It sounds as if there's this negative connotation surrounding the fact that many of us sport a wide range of what we consider 'attractive' in a person. Comments are full of women saying that we don't actually care about who we'll date and sleep with; we just want a 'warm body'. That women are 'interchangeable' to us. The core concept seemingly being that most just want to be thought of as special. But I've always been of the mind that it's less about 'being special' so much as it's about recognizing that, hey, this is a cool/cute person and I want to try and build something with this cool/cute person. The fact that this 'cool/cute person' can exist in a multitude of different ways shouldn't be a source of contempt, I feel like.

That's what I read when I see: "Don't be crazy, don't be fat". It's not that nothing else matters. It's not that you, as a person with thoughts, opinions and feelings don't matter. That's just a testament to the breadth of male interest. It's saying that if you're a shy and somewhat reserved girl that's still into, I dunno, Pokémon or something, you won't necessarily encounter the same roadblocks to romance as your male counterpart. And I've picked this up as a dude that generally doesn't follow Redpill.

Do you think this is a bad thing? Are we doing ourselves and women a disservice by not having more narrow margins for attraction?