Regardless of gender, I feel that the third party isn’t inherently guilty or to blame for being involved with someone in a relationship.

A relationship is an implied “contract” between two individuals, and if one of them decides to step out and cheat, the full guilt is placed on them - not the third party.

I am of the idea that if my partner is willing to cheat on me, good. I will find out sooner or later and that will be valuable information in leaving them and moving forward.

If you are with someone who is willing to cheat on you, you should feel fortunate that you found out, and you should leave that person without further suffering on your part. If a partner is willing to cheat on me, I would rather they do it sooner than later so I can find out that they are wrong for me.

You can call someone a “homewrecker” all you want, but it takes two to tango, and only one of those two has an agreement to remain loyal.

If you are the side-dude or the side-chick and a person who is in a relationship consciously cheats with you, I do not hold you accountable simply for being that third party.

I don’t care if the side-dude/chick is aware of the relationship or not. It’s really not their problem whatsoever. They did not agree to any relationship and they don’t owe loyalty to anybody. There are some exceptions to this rule of course.

I find that it’s too often that the side-person gets the full brunt of the blame, when it should all be on the taken individual.

The simplest way to put this:

There are three people. 2 of these have a committed monogamous relationship that they have agreed to. The third person has not made any commitments/promises and is single. Therefore, when the cheater and the side-dude/chick hook up, only the cheater has breached a commitment, the side-person has not breached anything. The side-person is therefore not guilty, and the cheater who breached commitment is 100% guilty.

Do you agree - why or why not?