I am just curious cause I don’t understand the logic behind this judgement. Laying the cause of his virginity at his feet ignore the variety of environmental, social, developmental and other factors that play into successful mating. People can find them in circumstances that seriously thwart their ability to get sex, and more importantly being in an intimate relationship. I think you only have to go to non-western upbringing for illustration. I am Indian-Australian, and boy, what a colourful clash of worldviews that can be sometimes.

Also, why is a guy being a virgin implies there is something wrong with him? To me this seems flawed for many reasons. I mean, if there is something wrong, then for who is it wrong? Also, having something wrong implies a person who lost it has something right. But do these “right”quality require losing virginity, and are beyond the grasp of someone who is a virgin? I personal cannot think of any. The only thing I earned was a sigh of relief that “I wasn’t one of them”….which now seems a really unnecessary motivation to get laid.