Unless you live in a traditional society, the fact that women are dating non-virgin men isn't "proof of women sharing whatever percent of men"

It's kind of stupid that this even needs to be said but then I remember the demographic of men that makes up the majority of this sub. Groups like AWDTSG, the Tea app, literally anything where women try to get information about a potential date is bizarrely used as conclusive evidence by the "logical, rational sex" that women are only interested in the same men. But literally the only way to avoid this is if women only ever dated men with zero previous relationship and sexual experience - which is not the norm. Most Western men are not virgins on their wedding day, most Western men have some previous relationship or sexual experience. So even if you wanted to try to claim this is proof of women "sharing men," it would be proof of women "sharing" the overwhelming majority of men. Because - once again - the overwhelming majority of women and men have more than one relationship and more than one sexual partner.

The other way the logic breaks down is merely posting a guy you had a relationship with doesn't automatically he's had previous relationship experience before you, and merely looking for info on a guy doesn't mean he'll be on there or will have had previous relationship experience either. The mere action of posting information or seeking information doesn't in and of itself indicate any previous experience. These are also errors in logic based on men's assumptions.

You cannot simply point to the existence of these groups as supporting evidence for your narrative. And if you think dating a non-virgin counts as "sharing the same guy," then most women and men are "sharing" each other. Because in the Western world the overwhelming majority of people have more than one partner during the course of their lifetime.