TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

    • /r/AllPillDebate
    • /r/AlreadyRed
    • /r/altTRP
    • /r/AntiFeminists
    • /r/askFDS
    • /r/askMRP
    • /r/askRPC
    • /r/becomeaman
    • /r/BlackPillScience
    • /r/Chadfish
    • /r/Divorce_Men
    • /r/EverydayMisandry
    • /r/ExRedPill
    • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
    • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
    • /r/GEOTRP
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • /r/MalePsychology
    • /r/Male_Studies
    • /r/MenSupportMen
    • /r/MGTOW2
    • /r/MuslimRedPill
    • /r/newTRP
    • /r/PussyPass
    • /r/PussyPassDenied
    • /r/RedPillBooks
    • /r/RedPillParenting
    • /r/RedPillWives
    • /r/RedPillWomen
    • /r/RedPillWorkplace
    • /r/RPChristians
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/ThankTRP
    • /r/TheRedPillStories
    • /r/trpGAME
    • /r/TRPOffTopic
    • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
    • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

    • Artful Prudence
    • A Voice for Men
    • Alpha Game
    • Black Label Logic
    • Caleb Jones
    • Captain Capitalism
    • Corporate Machiavelli
    • Days of Game
    • Deep Strength
    • Dicipres
    • Donal Graeme
    • Female Misogynist
    • Free Northerner
    • Gaming My Wife
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • In Mala Fide
    • KillToParty
    • Kill Your Inner Loser
    • Krauser PUA
    • LaidNYC
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • NO MA'AM
    • Omega Virgin Revolt
    • Pook's Mill
    • Random Xpat Rantings
    • Red Pill Theory
    • Red Pill Wifery
    • RedPillDad
    • RedPillDoctor
    • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
    • Sigma Frame
    • The Feminine Woman
    • The Futurist
    • The Masculine Principle
    • The Modern Man
    • The New Modern Man
    • The Obsidian Files
    • The Power Moves
    • The Private Man
    • The Red Pill Room
    • The Red Quest
    • The Rules Revisited
    • The Spearhead
    • Troy Francis
    • Wintery Knight
    • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

Would you be upset if going into a marriage your SO asked you to sign a prenuptial agreement agreement to protect both of you?

16F33

February 11, 2018
12 upvotes
/r/PurplePillDebate
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title Would you be upset if going into a marriage your SO asked you to sign a prenuptial agreement agreement to protect both of you?
Author

16F33

Upvotes 12
Comments 184
Date February 11, 2018 2:25 PM UTC
(8 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/PurplePillDebate
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/7wt1g8/would_you_be_upset_if_going_into_a_marriage_your/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/PurplePillDebate/would-you-be-upset-if-going-into-a-marriage-your.263642
https://theredarchive.com/post/263642
Top posts by 16F33

At 42 (M) one thing I realized is I'm not chasing anymore. The script has flipped. When I was younger, women held the cards, at this age...men control the escalation. Women my age fear being alone, men don't.

25 upvotes
February 10, 2018
/r/PurplePillDebate

Finding my way...

10 upvotes
April 25, 2017
/r/TheRedPill

Would you be ok if your SO asked for nude pictures or would this strain the relationship?

4 upvotes
February 11, 2018
/r/PurplePillDebate

Can someone explain the different types of "frame"...?

2 upvotes
February 11, 2018
/r/TheRedPill

Men are the gatekeepers of commitment and women are the gatekeepers of sex. Am I wrong?

0 upvotes
February 11, 2018
/r/PurplePillDebate

Comments

[–]ElderSignChildless post-wall cat lady21 points22 points23 points 8 years ago (23 children) | Copy Link

Depends on the contents of the pre-nup. For existing debt, assets acquired before marriage, potential inheritance, setting up for children (together and separately), stuff like that? Totally fine and understood. For other assets acquired during the marriage? I probably wouldn't be too upset but I would not marry him; that's a relationship of convenience, not an union.

[–]16F33[S] 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (21 children) | Copy Link

Those are the points I was wondering if someone would touch on. When it becomes about the now and moving forward...and one side still wants protected...it's for convenience.

[–]Zeusthemighty66695 points6 points7 points 8 years ago (20 children) | Copy Link

How so? If I make 250k a year and I'm buying literally everything why wouldn't I want to protect my assets we buy? If I buy the house I should keep the house

[–]ElderSignChildless post-wall cat lady1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago* (14 children) | Copy Link

It's totally fine, it's just not a "we're one" kind of relationship, so why get married at all?

[–]Zeusthemighty66694 points5 points6 points 8 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

Well I have seen "we're one" turn into divorce literally every time, so it's only the logical step. Especially as a man I'm the one risking the most. Lest say I find a girl I like that much, it's highly likely she'll complain about not marrying or not taking the relationship seriously to the point where she'll put me at gun point (metaphorically). Or even worse date her for 10yrs and have the government FORCE marriage on me. Basically the only way to stay with her for over 9yrs would be to marry her because the law force marries people.

[–]ElderSignChildless post-wall cat lady0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago* (10 children) | Copy Link

I have seen "we're one" turn into divorce literally every time

I've seen this literally never, so we're at the complete opposite ends of the probable bell curve. I think a lot of RPers and BPers come from very different backgrounds and run in very different groups though. (Though if you thought I meant "love at first sight, soulmates!", I did not. I meant a considered "we've known each other for years, probably lived together for some of them, and support each other to the point that any accomplishments should be considered shared; this works for us and we'd like to go deeper with it".)

it's highly likely she'll complain about not marrying or not taking the relationship seriously

Again very different backgrounds and peer groups, I don't know anyone like that in person. (Edit: Wait, I do, but they would probably want "the real thing" and a pre-nup would probably be a huge no. Rare though.) But wouldn't that suggest that you're not compatible for a long-term relationship?

date her for 10yrs and have the government FORCE marriage on me

I'm not familiar with foreign laws, but a quick google would imply that common law marriage in the US is pretty much a myth, and if you want to sign something it might as well be "we are not married, do not intend to be married, and should not be considered to be married for any legal purposes" so you won't need to go through any kind of divorce.

[–]Zeusthemighty66690 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

Well shit glad common law is gone now, that was a real pain, but yea in the use I think it's like 53-57% end in divorce and I have literally never seen a marriage last so the idea of planning ahead just seems like the logical option. That and I plan to make millions by 55 so I would pissed if I make say 10mil from working 80hrs a week for 30yrs and she gets 5million for doing literally nothing

[–]ElderSignChildless post-wall cat lady1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago* (4 children) | Copy Link

I wouldn't want to even be in a relationship with someone who did literally nothing, but if you want to then yeah, you definitely shouldn't marry them without a pre-nup. If I ended up in a relationship where I didn't need to do literally anything I probably wouldn't mind signing a pre-nup either (being a kept woman living with the man I love, able to pursue my own interests without financial concerns or relationship obligations, would be awesome), but again in that case I'd rather not get married at all.

[–]Zeusthemighty66692 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Fair points, but tbh my main driving force to get married is to have kids, I'm at this award stage where I want kids but am not yet ready for marriage and it kinda sucks

[–]16F33[S] 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Kids are behind me, marriage is not about kids anymore.

[–]16F33[S] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Are you hiring...? Lol

[–]Zeusthemighty66691 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Lolwut

[–]16F33[S] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I wanna be a millionaire too...haha

[–]SadDoggo450 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

You do realize that pre-nups are used are used in divorce. It makes no difference during actual marriage if you have pre-nups or not.

So by not wanting a pre-nups you are looking for a safe guard in case of a divorce. It's hypocritical to bash your SO in case of divorce.

[–]ElderSignChildless post-wall cat lady0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

Thank you, captain obvious. Yes, I did know pre-nups are for divorce. Still it transforms a "we're in this together (for now)" relationship, into a "mine and yours, shared (for now)" relationship. It's easier to sacrifice for "us" when you're married without a pre-nup (e.g. moving for the other's career opportunities, unequal sharing of childcare or chores) because it really is good for the both of you, whatever comes. Which is the main point about marriage, imho.

[–]toasterchild1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

If you make 250 a year and marry someone making nothing you are essentially agreeing to take care of that person financially to reasonable extent.

If you don't like the idea of risking some of your income then you can choose to not marry or marry someone who makes a similar salary to you.

[–]Zeusthemighty66692 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

But I shouldn't have to risk my wealth. I don't mind taking care of someone while married but if we get a divorce I'll be damned if they get a portion of my money without doing any work.

Edit: In the US if you don't marry but live together for 10yrs the government considers you married with all the bullshit that goes along with it so even if I chose to not marry them and we dated for 10yrs I'd still be fucked

[–]toasterchild-2 points-1 points0 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

That gives you all of the financial power and sets up some extremely abusive possibilities. I spoke with a lawyer before entering a marriage that was uneven earning split and the advice was not to do it. A major power imbalance is a situation ripe for resentment, plus they will get a bunch of what you earned while married if you divorce. Anything from before is safe if you don't comingle funds.

Much better to marry a person earning a similar salary. Limits resentment and fighting after divorce. Keep separate bank accounts and its easy to split if anything happens.

There are very few states left in the US that have any sort of common law marriage laws, you may have outdated information.

[–]Zeusthemighty66694 points5 points6 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

That makes no sense. I'm not going to be like " I like you but you're too poor". Also like I said I don't mind paying for someone if we're together, but AFTER the fact it makes no sense they should get any of my money. That's why if I do get married it will be in a Norwegian area because they play that shit down the middle as in if you get divorced you split the earned assists down the middle and after that you keep what's yours as in I'm not losing anything we didn't buy together

[–]toasterchild0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It doesn't matter where you get married only where you are living when you divorce. So you would have to live in Norway where most people make a reasonable salary long term.

There aren't many places in the us that you will pay long term alimony, maybe a few years unless you were married a really long time and your wife never worked. Like basically, if that's your concern, font marry someone who doesn't work.

[–]zerobones0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

For existing debt

Can get messy, due to the fact that people lie about their spending and debts a whole bunch to partners.

Plenty of storys out there of people getting married, protecting themselves with a prenup only to find their partner has 100k of debt they didn't care to mention and is now effectively trapped with that.

[–]V_GManRed Pill Man6 points7 points8 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

No. You'd be delusional if you think every relationship is soul-bound to last forever, as bad as we would want that to be true.

[–]16F33[S] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Agree totally. Usually prenups are requested by only one party...as both don't typically have something to protect.

[–][deleted] -2 points-1 points0 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

My grandparents have been together 60 years and my parents for 35

[–]cxj75% Redpill Core Ideas3 points4 points5 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

So literallly everyone

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points9 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

No, if anything I'd insist on it because it's the smart thing to do.

In the event of a divorce both parties probably gain more from an agreement made in good faith than from a spiteful fight over possessions. And if the marriage does last the prenup doesn't matter because you share your things (within reasonable limit) anyways.

[–]16F33[S] 4 points5 points6 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Agreed, it's ALOT different at 40 than it was at 20 when we don't have anything (career, assets, etc).

[–]KikiYuyuPurple Pill Woman5 points6 points7 points 8 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link

I'd have mixed feelings. Emotionally I'd feel upset, but logically I'd know it's a smart move.

[–]16F33[S] 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Exactly what I was thinking, and that’s when you have to decide whether it’s worth it or not. It is a shot to the ego no matter how you look at it.

[–]Zeusthemighty66691 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link

Why would you be upset

[–]KikiYuyuPurple Pill Woman2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

It would upset me that the person I loved and wanted to spend my life with was thinking that much about a potential messy break up. Again, I understand the logic of it, but it's hurtful to even think it could come in handy.

[–]Zeusthemighty66690 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

I guess, but for me I think about how "every relationship should be your last" and how that never really works out

[–]KikiYuyuPurple Pill Woman1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

That's the logic of it, yes, but are you saying that doesn't make you even a little sad?

[–]Zeusthemighty66690 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Nope, I have been cheated on so I'm suspect of every relationship, it's not that I don't love or trust them it's just that I would rather protect myself

[–]KikiYuyuPurple Pill Woman1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Something making all the sense in the world doesn't mean I won't feel sad about it. It's not like I think I'll never be cheated on ever, because obviously it could happen. But it's not something I can think about with emotional detachment.

[–]Zeusthemighty66690 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

I guess Im different because I'm a guy. But I don't get invested emotionally until after we've dated for at least 6mo

[–]KikiYuyuPurple Pill Woman0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Well since the subject is prenups, I figured there would be enough emotional investment for marriage to be seriously discussed.

[–]Zeusthemighty66690 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

True I just mean I that I can marry someone without being emotionally invested and also not for money. It's hard to explain but it's like "I can stand to be around this girl for years at a time and not go crazy so I could marry her". Personally I don't believe in " love" anymore or rather my idea of love was destroyed that day. For me anyone that "loves" me is still capable of hurting me, or even worse and more accurately can hurt me the most so a prenuptial at least let's me keep my stuff if/when it goes to shit. Also I don't know anyone that hasn't gotten divorced so yea

[–]RooseChange0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I totally understand the emotional part of this problem and I wish we didn't live in a world where prenups were necessary. But the way I look at it is, if she knows me well enough to have agreed to marry me, then she should be expecting this kind of logical decision-making from me. If it takes her by surprise or upsets her then that's a huge flag that she doesn't know what she's getting with me.

[–]KikiYuyuPurple Pill Woman0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That's a really good point. I guess my reaction would change depending on who I ended up with. I'd still feel a little sad in the back of my mind, but depending on who it is I may or may not be surprised about it.

[–]Electra_CuteChristian, Flat Earther, Anti-Vaxxer, Astrologer5 points6 points7 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

No

[–]theambivalentrooster5 points6 points7 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I would have been confused because we both had more debt than assets going into the marriage but as a team we’ve turned the ship around and are well into the green.

Hurray DINKhood!

[–]16F33[S] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Congrats!

[–]sublimemongrelBecky, Esq.5 points6 points7 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I’d do it. I might be a tad upset but I understand that it’s practical.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Hmm, sounds like this chick has some money. Of course I'll sign it.

[–]DebatePonyLet's ride!4 points5 points6 points 8 years ago (21 children) | Copy Link

Protect both of us from what? Would we both have separate lawyers to look at it and make sure it's okay?

[–]Atlas_B_Shruggin🔪Yeetus that Feetus🔪3 points4 points5 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

its not valid unless you do

[–]16F33[S] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (19 children) | Copy Link

This yes, but typically one has more than the other. People often look at prenups as withholding from someone you care about. I agree with your statement.

[–]DebatePonyLet's ride!2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (18 children) | Copy Link

But what is the prenup supposed to protect us from?

[–]16F33[S] 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (17 children) | Copy Link

Maybe the other taking your shit...?

[–]DebatePonyLet's ride!1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (16 children) | Copy Link

Why would you marry someone thinking their going to want to take your shit?

[–]MercedesBenzoAMGbringing percocets molly percocet back to ppd2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

That's like refusing to get insurance because "why would I buy anything thinking someone will steal it?"

[–]DebatePonyLet's ride!1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

Not really because a car/house/other objects don't have personalities/morals/self-determination. Hopefully one gets to know their potential spouse well enough to vet them so any failures in their character to be evident and thus wheedle out those who could be "stolen."

[–]MercedesBenzoAMGbringing percocets molly percocet back to ppd0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Alright to alter the analogy slightly: "I know the car I chose is great and there's no chance it'll break so who needs a warranty?"

Same deal. Fact is you just don't know this shit. As you said yourself, you're dealing with another individual who has their own motivations. Those could change entirely a few years down the line. That's precisely why you should protect yourself against risk.

[–]DebatePonyLet's ride!0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Using your still crummy analogy, if you bring your car in for regular check ups and maintain it properly it's very unlikely that it will break down randomly. Ya know, unless your ignore all those weird noises that it makes and are assuming it's going to be okay.

Kinda just like if you take care of your relationship it is unlikely to break down randomly. But it's silly to assume that one won't change during the course of a relationship. I'm a very different person than who I was when my husband and I first got together, and he's a different person, but when you're in a committed relationship, you don't change in a bubble. You change and are changed by your partner.

[–]MercedesBenzoAMGbringing percocets molly percocet back to ppd0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Except you can always get a lemon out of pure bad luck regardless and there's nothing you can do to prevent that unless you just don't buy a car.

Likewise you could do everything right in a relationship but your partner could fuck something up or maybe you or them or both just don't feel it anymore after being together for 10 years of the same old boring routine and there's fuck all you can do if they decide to leave. What you gonna do, hold them hostage?

Life isn't as simple as "do the right thing and get a reward", it'd be nice if it was but your just world fallacy isn't reality.

[–]16F33[S] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

No one ever plans for the demise... but if I’m worth 500k + future earning and she brings nothing to the table... am I just buying a slave

[–]DebatePonyLet's ride!-1 points0 points1 point 8 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Don't marry someone who brings nothing to the table. That's just silly.

[–]16F33[S] 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

How? Love isn’t enough. Marriages itself outside of religion it’s about a contract a business-transaction... holding both accountable. You don’t have to be married to love someone or to care for them. There are many reasons people get married, one is often benefits something as simple as health insurance... typically do the state laws. Again, many reasons.

[–]DebatePonyLet's ride!1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

By finding someone who brings something to the table. "Bringing something to the table" will vary from person to person. It may be financial security, it may be emotional support, it could be any number of things, love included. I just think it's silly to want to join your life with someone who you think doesn't bring anything to the table.

Marriage is defined by those involved and it is different for most people. My marriage is very different from my brothers, or my sisters, or my parents, or his parents.

[–]16F33[S] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Absolutely, we all have different needs. If my GF was financially stable and I’m just someone she wants to be with...she’s gotta decide if I’m worth it or not. We live in a VERY litigious society.

[–]TheChemist158Non-Feminist Blue Pill Woman3 points4 points5 points 8 years ago* (4 children) | Copy Link

I actually am currently engaged and hadn't really thought about it. I'm not even sure what ours would say, but given the terms are reasonable I wouldn't be opposed.

EDIT: I found an online example here. Yeah, I'd be on board with signing that. It pretty much his shit is his, and my shit is mine. If we divorce I don't get anything form assets solely in his name, I don't get any of his pension, I don't get alimony. Same with him, which I think might be more relevant since he wants to soft retire at 35. I want our finances to be seperate, I feel better that way and that is our current agreement. The only complaint would be getting a lawyer. They cost money and if I am understanding things correctly, we would need two of them.

[–]16F33[S] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

It works when BOTH bring something to the table...best of luck!

[–]TheChemist158Non-Feminist Blue Pill Woman2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Hey, I have a career where I'm expected to earn just as much (both PhDs, he's chemical engineering I'm biochemistry). He's hoping to put more money into investments so he can live off of dividends when he's still young. I want to keep working until I drop. So he might have more assets during the first years, but after that I would get the chance to build more, and he might then be eligible for alimony. Assuming of course our vision for the future pans out, which is always a big if. But he has a PhD, I'm a couple years away from mine, and our fields tend to make good and comparable money.

[–]16F33[S] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Congrats to you! Living for today...as tomorrow isn't guaranteed. I wanted out of my marriage bad enough (she messed up) that I waited for her to get promoted and make more money before I left ensuring she was financially safe.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Ya lawyers cost money so does getting a divorce. Tho getting a prenup that will be held up in court (this is key) makes the divorce process easier and that cheaper as everything is already agreed upon so the divorce lawyers won't get much and you probably make only a couple trips to the court house.

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points 8 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

Of course not. There's plenty of other women out there who would trust me.

[–]16F33[S] 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

You'd be ok with him getting his fill from the internet?

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

Whoever he is, I don't care what he does on the Internet.

[–]16F33[S] 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

The internet is a dangerous place. It can quickly become real life.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

I've survived real life for this long. I can do it some more.

[–]16F33[S] 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Sorry what I meant by that was...what if he shares online and then meets-up?

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

I don't even know him. It's none of my business.

[–]16F33[S] 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

probably better that way.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

I also don't know what you're talking about. I think you've replied to the wrong comment and I've just been going along with it for fun.

[–]16F33[S] 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I might be, I'm sorry.

[–]i_have_a_semicolonPurple Pill Woman4 points5 points6 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

i wouldnt be upset.........No.

[–]-AveMaria-2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Don't believe in divorce. Don't believe in prenup. So if he asks I'll kick him.

But marriage for me is a lot more serious than it is for most.

[–]L0git3xRed Pill Man5 points6 points7 points 8 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

27 years ago I was cautious enough with who I married.

I didnt need one. still dont.

If you need a prenuptial agreement you probably shouldn't get married.

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points8 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If you need a prenuptial agreement you probably shouldn't get married.

That's a bit of a stretch. It's kind of Like saying if you really need car insurance you shouldn't drive.

[–]16F33[S] 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Maybe, but 27 years ago did you or your SO have any tangible assets?

[–]toasterchild0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

There are all sorts of reasons people change for the worse sometimes, it doesn't always matter how careful you were going in. A brain injury or tumor could be all three difference in a partner who now hates you and wants to take you for every penny you have. People change and sometimes it really sucks.

[–]SadDoggo450 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Pre-nups are only in the case of the divorce.

First of all if we are making substantially different incomes, it would make me fell much better to know that my SO isn't using me for money.

Secondly, the same way a person is planing "in case of devorce" with prenup, the person saying no to the prenup is also planing in case of the divorce - they don't want to give up the benefits they have. If they don't care about the assets, prenup is straight forward decision.

[–]civiestudent3 points4 points5 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I wouldn't marry someone who didn't want to plan for an eventuality like this. It's like life insurance - people avoid it because they don't want to think about needing it. Then your spouse dies and leaves you with young kids, and you could've used that financial padding to fall back on. Pre-nups can prevent costly divorce battles and encourage partners to be honest about their finances and desires, so...no, I wouldn't get upset. I'd suggest it myself.

[–]crumblesnatch<>-<>-<>2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Considering I made more money than him at the time of our marriage, and was sponsoring his continued presence in the country, it would have been an interesting contract to write. What non-existent assets would we be protecting?

That said, if all things were the same except he was incredibly wealthy when we met, I'd sign an agreement.

[–]16F33[S] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Do you think he valued citizenship?

[–]crumblesnatch<>-<>-<>1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

He has a lot of "points" on our immigration system, so it wouldn't have been difficult for him to get permanent residency without me -- it just would have taken longer. It made more sense for me to sponsor him as his spouse, because that way he wasn't dependent on work to remain in the country. He could go back to school while I worked instead.

I don't know that he valued citizenship as a benefit of marrying me; he certainly prefers living here and I helped that happen. But he's from South Korea, not some third world country. I speak Korean and am comfortable living there, and we did consider settling in Seoul. We stayed in Canada mainly because he prefers the culture here, and there's more career opportunities for both of us (oddly, it'd be easier for me to find work in Korea than him, due to the demand for our fields).

[–]16F33[S] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Thank you for sharing...sincerely...yea, it's too cold in Canada...haha

[–]crumblesnatch<>-<>-<>2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Just as cold in Korea, which surprises people lol.

[–]16F33[S] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yea, I was in Seoul about a year ago, it is cold af there sometimes.

[–]TheBookOfSeilCuckleberry Finn2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Of course not. I'd want to know that we'd be together for each other, and not what we have or are capable of obtaining.

[–]Zeusthemighty66692 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

No because I'm not a woman so I'm not getting married for money

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points 8 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link

Nope, I signed it

[–]16F33[S] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

May I ask why you signed it?

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points 8 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

a prenuptial agreement agreement to protect both of you?

because it's protects us?

[–]16F33[S] -1 points0 points1 point 8 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

Guess what I was hoping you would reveal is how you felt protected...or what is it that you were protecting?

[–]TheChemist158Non-Feminist Blue Pill Woman3 points4 points5 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Not the same person but I would like to get a prenup. Me and my boyfriend actually just got engaged so it's a real idea for us. It would protect my assets. I'm not sure which one of us would have more assets if/when we wanted to divorce but I feel like I have no claim over his assets so I don't feel like I would lose anything with a prenup. I am pretty protective over my shit and wouldn't want him to get anything that is mine.

[–]16F33[S] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Well I guess a stipulation you could put in there is anything earned from the moment you’re married it’s combined... just like the stock market they can keep track of that shit.

[–][deleted] 10 points11 points12 points 8 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Well maybe you should have written an actual post then, instead of spamming the board with Cosmo survey questions.

[–]16F33[S] -2 points-1 points0 points 8 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

You didn't have to reply.

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points 8 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Try editing your post if you want more involved responses.

[–]TheWhitestOrca4 points5 points6 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

There’s no need to be an asshole. OP asked you to elaborate, but you refused to elaborate because the original post didn’t ask for it. Why the hell should OP edit the post just for you to elaborate when they just asked you personally to elaborate? Seems like you’re just being a dick for the sake of being a dick.

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'll go ahead and file this good advice in the round bin, thanks

[–]16F33[S] 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

What kind of edit do you suggest?

[–]RockinSocksII25F poiple INTP - Not single, Eastuss needs to know this1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Nope. Unfortunate for him though because I make way more money.

[–]16F33[S] 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

You control the $ over him, does he control anything over you (aka leverage)?

[–]RockinSocksII25F poiple INTP - Not single, Eastuss needs to know this0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Nope.

[–]16F33[S] 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

He hit the jackpot...or you're getting what you want, maybe both?

[–]RockinSocksII25F poiple INTP - Not single, Eastuss needs to know this1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

As long as he keeps being sweet on me, that's all I want.

[–]16F33[S] 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That all I want as well. You're very lucky!

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

No.

[–]mgtow_11 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

If I was thinking about marriage to a woman then she would have to be at a similar economic level to myself and I would be 100% on board for a prenup.

[–]16F33[S] 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Typically men marry down, women marry up...

[–]mgtow_11 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Been my experience too. That's why I'm not married.

[–]16F33[S] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

yea...we never learn.

[–]nemma8830/F/UK INFP -t. Engaged1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

My current situation yes because something would have changed and I'd be feeling guarded as to what.

In general though, or it had been that way from the start, no. Prenuptials are good for the party without assets too, in majority of circumstances non owner is going to be contributing to those within the relationship (let's face it we are talking about businesses and houses here). Those non owners protect themselves by way of ownership or monitary too incase of relationship breakdown. Prenup marriage is a lot more protection still than cohabiting and paying off someones house for them to screw you by leaving with zilch to show at the end.

[–]16F33[S] 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Exactly. If you don't come into it with anything, one can't expect to leave with something unless it's (a life) built together.

[–]Orange_Paisley1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

Since I make a lot more money than he does and am the one with the pension and 401K, I would be happy to sign a prenup that protects my assets. We aren’t planning to get married though.

[–]16F33[S] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

Why do you do it?

I ask because I'm kinda in the same dilemma.

[–]Orange_Paisley1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

I’m not sure I understand the question. Do you mean why am I with a partner who makes less than me? Because he is a good person, takes good care of our little family, and we have great sexual chemistry.

[–]16F33[S] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

All that said, marriage isn't something you feel is a necessity? I appreciate your candidness...

[–]Orange_Paisley1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

We were both married before - him twice - and so we just don’t feel the need to do that again. We live together, split the bills, take care of each other, have fun together. If it stops working, I would rather just move than go through a lengthy and costly divorce.

[–]16F33[S] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

I understand that...I was married 18 years and have 2 teens, I'll be an empty-nester soon and just want to enjoy whoevers across from me. The girl (40/f) I'm seeing now has made it clear she wants a baby and to get married (would be her 2nd). 1. I've had kids and don't wanna go back to the baby years and 2. Wouldn't even consider it, until mine are both gone (3-4 years from now). So, yea I understand where you're coming from.

[–]Orange_Paisley1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Yeah, mine would love a baby too, he has never had one. I think that particular Elvis has left the building though, I’m 46 and he is 53. My kid is an adult now and I am enjoying the empty nest.

[–]16F33[S] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Not that I don't enjoy children, especially mine...I just don't wanna chase the next nap/feeding time when I have a few good years left.

[–]Orange_Paisley1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Precisely.

[–]DaphneDK42King of LBFM1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

You should break up with her then, give her a chance to go on and fulfil her dreams.

[–]16F33[S] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I think it will happen soon because she is escalating things and reminding me constantly that there are things that she wants. Again I think it’s a conversation she doesn’t want answers to because she knows when I’m going to say. I just enjoy my time with her.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

no

[–]LeaneGenovaBreaker of (comment) Chains1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Nope. I'm a large proponent of a pre-nup for my marriage. I make about 800% (or maybe 900, I haven't done the math), and I know how I get when I am vengeful. I'd rather protect my SO against my asshole nature by putting into effect a pre-nup than leaving him high and dry.

Granted, I have zero fear of us breaking up. But still. It's safer to prepare for the worst while we love each other than leave it until I want to smush his face.

[–]16F33[S] 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Agreed, once that part of the business transaction is behind you can you can actually concentrate on loving each other

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

No, I wouldn't be upset at all.

[–]shoup88Report me bitch1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

I would get my lawyer to review it and make sure it's actually good for both of us, and not just him. Providing it's a fairly standard agreement, I'd have no problem signing it. I wouldn't push for it myself as he has more money than I do (and so does his family).

It wouldn't have any emotional effect on me.

[–]16F33[S] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

She would likely have her own attorney review hers otherwise there’s a conflict of interest.

[–]shoup88Report me bitch1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Who is "she"? Are you asking about a specific couple?

[–]16F33[S] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Him...sorry.

[–]shoup88Report me bitch1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If he's smart enough to get a prenup, I'm sure he's smart enough that he's already discussed it with a lawyer without my prompting.

[–]LifterofThingsDelicate Feminine Flower1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

No, so long as it were reasonable. In the current legal climate, I totally understand the appeal of a prenup.

[–]damaskrose 1 points1 points1 points 8 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

I don't believe in divorce and wouldn't marry someone who views divorce as an option. I wouldn't necessarily be upset, but I wouldn't sign it.

[–]16F33[S] 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

No one ever goes into marriage anticipating an end. No one in their right mind anyway. I think it’s because there’s always something to protect unless you’re 20 and have absolutely nothing.

[–]damaskrose 1 points1 points1 points 8 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

I accept my husband and I might hate each other someday. Still doesn't mean we'd get a divorce.

[–]16F33[S] 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Ahhh, you prefer misery over happiness...for it. But seriously...why give up good days for bad?

[–]damaskrose 1 points1 points1 points 8 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Because I promised I would. That's the whole point of marriage. Not love, not happiness. Commitment.

[–]16F33[S] 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

So, there’s not 1 dealbreaker in this world?

[–]damaskrose 1 points1 points1 points 8 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Sure there are, but misery isn't one of them.

[–]16F33[S] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Fair enough...suppose it depends on what led to the misery.

[–]SpaceWhiskey🍃 Social Justice Druid 🍂1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

No, as long as it’s fair. In general people who get offended about prenups confuse me.

[–]16F33[S] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

The one that complains is usually the one holding to get something for nothing.

[–]SpaceWhiskey🍃 Social Justice Druid 🍂1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I don’t think think they want something for nothing, I think they have very naive beliefs about marriage, or at least beliefs that are very different from mine. I’m not a religious person, so if they’re religious that could explain it without having to call them naive.

[–]16F33[S] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Religion muddles so much of life

[–]buarthaDelights in homosexuality1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It wouldn't bother me, but I see why it would bother people with a certain romantic outlook or those who are religious.

[–]carefreevermillionLook at me. I'm the Chad now.1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link

I've actually tried to get my boyfriend to consider a pre-nup before we get married because he has some assets and he was the one that got offended.

[–]16F33[S] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link

That’s because he doesn’t think you’re serious... he thinks your shit testing him

[–]carefreevermillionLook at me. I'm the Chad now.1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

My shit tests are way more obvious than discussing a pre-nup, lol, I'm very disagreeable for a woman.

[–]16F33[S] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

Haha, no, you sound like he typical woman...in my experience, I’ve had women pick a fight just for something to do only to find out later...meh, just messing with you...so yea, now I just play along...lol

[–]carefreevermillionLook at me. I'm the Chad now.1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

I don't really pick fights unless I have something to fight about. It's a waste of my time.

[–]16F33[S] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

Just have that serious conversation with him. He’ll know your serious when you tell him your attorney is and you’d like to finalize it. Marriage will become more real than ever for him.

[–]carefreevermillionLook at me. I'm the Chad now.0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

I think my consulting an attorney without him would be more shit testing than mere talking to him, as I will have gone behind his back as I knew better than he did about what he needed. Marriage is already considered to be a business contract between us, so the gravity is not lost on him.

[–]16F33[S] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

You know you can’t have the same attorneys right? That or tell him you’re planning to set an appointment and he should do the same, it’s a small loose end to tie up. You have your interests and he has his. This is the transactional portion of the “marriage” arrangement. Once your past this, you can get back to loving, then this will all be an afterthought.

[–]carefreevermillionLook at me. I'm the Chad now.0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Yes, I'm aware. What part of your response addresses me deliberately going against his wishes if I were to follow your advice? Wouldn't that be a larger betrayal of his trust and leadership? (Hint: yes)

[–]16F33[S] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

He can’t feel betrayed here...he doesn’t stand to lose anything. If your allowing him to control you, by you obeying him...that might be a deeper issue. So, you’re saying you’ll never do something in your best interest and ask for forgiveness later with him? He will, I promise. I’m not trying to be a dick, just being honest. Neither of you are now, what you will be in 20 years. Plan for the unexpected...if it never occurs, it’ll forever be an afterthought. Best of luck, sincerely.

[–]ABC_FloridaRed Pill Man1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I will never marry. I've seen enough divorces in my family. Not worth it. Both parties consider the state of marriage as achieving a goal. That's BS. No relationship lives on its own. You have to work to keep it alive.

Also, there have been many ridiculous demands during divorces. Homemaker who never had to work a job, lives in a three floor suburban house, got new cars from hubby, got brand new businesses handed over by her husband when she wanted to occupy herself, went to hairdresser once a week, twice had her nails done a week; wanted nearly 2 M$ in divorce, new cars of her liking every 5 years, gas for the car, get her utility bills also payed. All the wile her contribution to the marriage was giving birth to 2 children (not that they aren't her children too), making food (she's a terrific cook BTW), and sometimes cleaning the house while they had no cleaning lady. When her husband separated, she wasn't even willing to mow her own lawn. She demanded a worker to be sent over for 1.5 hours (tops) work. This half of you make belongs to me only sounds great if you are not the one sweating for the wealth you create.

[–]16F33[S] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Wow! That’ll leave a bad taste in your mouth...

[–]ABC_FloridaRed Pill Man1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Happily not my mouth. Other than that she was a kind woman. Not as good mother as mine. You know, it seems to me that the worse background you come from, the better you give your kids. She came from money, and was brought into even bigger wealth by her husband. Yet did not spend as much time on her children than my mother did. What is more fucked up, that she involved her kids into her revenge and wraith. It's fucked up when your daughter claims you don't love them and you don't provide to them as a father. Then a few years later, she finds out, that she was manipulated by her mother, and she lives with that guilt. That's not how you raised a balanced happy human.

[–]NoodlersNightshade1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

It would really depend. Don't ask me to sign a prenup and then tell me I have to do all the housework, stay home, raise children, etc so you can go out and earn money I can't have access to if we divorce.

A prenup with a financially less stable wife means you're basically using her as an employee to take care of your chores while you grow your wealth and have no intention of sharing it. Even though you would have less if she wasn't around to do your work for you at home.

Now if you have a prenup and household staff to do those chores so she can go out and maximize her own opportunities for increasing wealth (and not share them with you because of the prenup) go ahead. Most rich people have prenups but then most rich couples both work at their own careers.

A prenup is fine. A prenup you're using to indenture your wife as a servant so you can earn more money that you don't have to share is a shitty situation and it doesn't protect her at all if she has no opportunities to go out and earn her own wealth.

[–]16F33[S] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Yup. This is what I hoped someone would raise. Protections can be a place for both i.e. you make it to 10 years you get 40% you make it to 15 years you get 50%. That’s the transactional piece to a prenup. She expects him to go out and earn for the family and he expects her to care and nurture the family... it’s reasonable if both sides accept the situation.

[–]NoodlersNightshade0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

it’s reasonable if both sides accept the situation.

No, it's not. Not from a financial standpoint.

Even if she only takes on child rearing tasks, asking her to clean your dishes, wash your clothes, scrub your shower is taking time out of her day that you’re only repaying by putting a roof over her head. And that lasts only as long as you want it to. Because you can divorce her at any time, for any reason. So you’re asking her to permanently bork her maximum earning potential in the marketplace by doing all that work for you for basically peanuts.

I mean if she worked as an actual maid cleaning other people’s toilets she’d be better off than doing it for you as your wife because she’d presumably get healthcare, a 401K, marketable skills, access to advancement opportunities at the job, all of which still exist if you divorce her.

If you divorce her, her only real source of income is gone and she’s wasted potentially years of her life not making herself a more employable person. So if you think a prenup is going to allow you to protect yourself at the expense of your wife, you might find a very hard time finding a judge who’d even honor it. I mean look at Peter Petrakis, a court refused to honor his prenup. Now his wife gets millions instead of barely few hundred thousand.

Look at the Jill Scott case. Rich female singer makes man sign prenup for peanuts. Now he’s pissed because she wants a divorce and he gets nothing so he’s trying to have the prenup thrown out. Prenups are being challenged more and more these days and I don’t think they’re going to withstand the test of time when they can obviously be used to screw the spouse of lower socioeconomic status.

We're kind of over the days where you could use a prenup to enslave your wife to increase your own wealth.

I don't think a prenup like the one you describe above is feasible. In some cases, maybe. But 50% of nothing is still nothing. There's no guarantee in 15 years you'll be making anything.

If your earning potential is hindered for some reason, or her earning potential increases for some reason, then 50% of some questionable amount 15 years from now is not worth the actual income available right now for a lot of people.

So what if she gets 50% of your income according to that paper? What if you're dead? What if you get hit by a car? Now she has 50% of nothing other than your life insurance, which is a finite sum. Good luck with that. In every conceivable way it's better if she invests in herself rather than invest in a future that you have no ability to guarantee will occur.

That's a bet I wouldn't bother making unless in the prenup there are provisions for both of us sharing the cost of household servants: (Cook, maid, landscaper, part time nanny, etc).

There simply is no situation where the wife stays home and husband works that's more lucrative to the couple than both spouses working and agreeing to split the cost of hiring staff.

[–]16F33[S] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

From your take, prostitutes are cheaper. In all seriousness, it’s a negotiation. If she or he can’t accept the terms...maybe it’s not meant to be. Everyone’s situation is different. Most people don’t have the $ you’re taking about above, and sometimes women just choose to stay home. My point was, from the moment we are husband and wife, everything moving forward is earned together. Is she or he, entitled to what she/he made/earned/inherited prior to the marriage taking effect? No. If it’s allowed by the partner with assets, so be it. As for earning a paycheck (alimony), that’s a negotiable item in the prenup. If it’s not agreed upon, maybe the value of the marriage isn’t warranted. That’s where both parties have to decide what’s best for them individually. If they placed an order that says say 20 years down the prenup is stale, then its agreed. Again this is the transactional portion of the marriage. Prenups can protect the individual coming into the marriage with nothing just as much as they can protect the individual with all the assets.

[–]eliechallita1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I brought that one up with my fiancee a little while ago because we're getting married in August since we have a disparity in income and assets: I work in tech while she's in public health, so my income is guaranteed to be and remain larger than hers. On the other hand, her family is much wealthier than mine so she's likely to get much more from them later on.

I have about 15K left in debts from grad school, but I'm easily on track to repay those with my current income, and she doesn't have any debt to speak of. I have a nice bunch of stocks from work, whereas she has larger savings.

We eventually decided not to do it now, because we simply don't have a large enough disparity overall to make it useful. We can always go for a postnup later on.

[–]16F33[S] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yes, post-nups can be just as effective.

[–]adrixshadowIndigo Pill(aka dark and evil occult pill)1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

You are saying that like I wouldn't bring it myself.

If we are both on the same page it saves time from the whole "But you don't trust me!" bullshit.

[–]16F33[S] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I’m ok with it but many here are not. So it seems.

[–]AutoModeratorBiased against humans[M] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Attention!

  • You can post off topic/jokes/puns as a comment to this Automoderator message.

  • For "CMV" and "Question for X" Threads: Parent comments that aren't from the target group will be removed, along with their child replies.

  • If you want to agree with OP instead of challenging their view or if the question is not targeted at you, post it as an answer to this comment.

  • OP you can choose your own flair according to these guidelines., just press Flair under your post!

Thanks for your cooperation and enjoy the discussion!

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

[–]despisedlove2Reality Pill Tradcon RP0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

No.

[–]16F33[S] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Divorce isn’t always up to you as compared to marriage requires both to agree.

[–]16F33[S] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Those are perfect reasons.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

No, I wouldn't be upset, it would be preferable. What's mine is mine and what's hers is hers, and if we decide to separate, we get what is ours back.

[–]16F33[S] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Yea, if it’s earned, or lost (debt in the marriage)...it should be split.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Depends.

If you bought a house together, that's 50/50.

If she or I decides to go to school and gets student loans, that's should stay with the individual.

[–]16F33[S] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Loans support the family? The family benefits from the additional income...shouldn’t the family shoulder the burden?

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Loans can support the family, but if you divorce, the education is only going to support the person who got it.

[–]16F33[S] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

And that takes us back to...no one ever plans to get divorced.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Their mistake, I think.

Also I think people who are using pre-nups are planning on just-in-case, so they'd be more open to things like that.

[–]16F33[S] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

When I was married our incomes were combined in the same account everything was combine bills paid everything, now in the current relationship I’m in it’s almost as if it’s a back-and-forth, you take care of this I’ll take care of that, I have dinner tonight you get it tomorrow, that’s just not something I’m used to.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter