Never believed treating girls like shit makes them want you, until yesterday!

"We do what works, not what is decent. If you were looking for the morally correct amswer TRP is the wrong place to discuss it."

The question posed above was whether he treated her like shit, not did it work, so I answered it. My answer is the correct one, but I wouldn't have offered it, if the question wasn't asked.

Because he seemed to care, I offered him an out: try to seek out a different sexual marketplace, which means a more conservative culture or religion--some being more effective than others for this purpose--where he can mate with a cleaner conscience. It won't change basic female biology, nor would I advocate he become a beta, because the female nature remains the same, but the dating dynamics change, as well as the probability of infidelity. Furthermore it becomes less necessary to become outright dark triad to demonstrate dominance. You can observe this even in general society: the traits required to demonstrate male dominance at some rich, preppy high school, are not as drastic, or socially destructive, as those needed in urban Detroit.

Though I didn't need TRP to intuit this, I have seen it observed on redpill sites, that the response by men to the sexual behavior of women in modern western society, where sexual contraints are almost completely absent, can take 3 main forms: 1) MGTOW 2) PUA/Game/"Enjoy the decline"--which is what is most often discussed here 3) Date within the context of a different sexual marketplace (more conservative culture/religious subgroup). I suggested he consider #3.

TRP is effective for discussing the lower impulses of humanity in great detail, free of PC, and for that reason it is a tremendous achievement, but in my view tends to be reductionistic as a result. People are born selfish, but more noble elements of their character can emerge (emerge, as in the potential is there all along) with training, though the basic animal instincts always REMAIN--one is simply better equipped to decide how to respond to the instincts, especially if he or she can satisfy the animal instincts to a sufficient degree to make the internal conflict less acute. The optimum scenario is where the animal impulses are satisfied to a degree, but are otherwise parlayed into socially constructive institutions such as marriage to an individual of sufficiently high SMV who also has the necessary character to go the distance.

I'm aware that moral issues are not generally brought up on this forum, but they are occasionally. Your tendency to bracket moral questions for the sake of pragmatism does not actually make them go away, and because of what's at stake you may be ultimately in for a rude awakening if you get it wrong.