695,976 posts

The Reddit Administration Recants

Reddit View
October 2, 2018
818 upvotes

As many have noticed, Reddit Admin have taken down their required truth reading link to Michael Kimmel's Scam before entering /r/TheRedPill, mainly after I posted this scathing takedown where I explained that their resource on "positive masculinity" was, in fact, a male abuse victim denier.

That's right folks, you can't make it up. Reddit admin, who fancy themselves as the purveyors of what is good and what is not, accidentally told a men's forum that they were absolutely and unequivocally wrong, bad and offensive, and then tried to tell them that the true path to positive masculinity IS DENYING MALE ABUSE VICTIMS.

Holy fucking shit, Reddit Admin. What on earth are you thinking?

Here's what we know now:

The Reddit admin- the ones who believe it is up to them to tell us what we can and cannot read not based on rules, not based on legalities, but on a false sense of morality and self-righteousness, just recanted on their allegedly moral position of what positive masculinity is. Because it was absolutely, undoubtedly, and utterly immoral.

We are still drafting our appeal to the quarantine, but honestly we're starting to think the Reddit Admin are writing the appeal for us.

To the Reddit Admin: You have demonstrated that you are not an authority on morality. You have demonstrated that you do not have the proper judgment to tell users what they should and should not read. You have just subjected 300,000 of your users to an anti-male, abuse-denier. I think you should be ashamed, and I think you should apologize to the users here.

A positive, non-toxic male admits when he's wrong and apologizes when he accidentally denies to 300,000 men that they can be victims of abuse.


Who here thinks the admin have the proper judgment to be able to tell them what they should and should not read?


Post Information
Title The Reddit Administration Recants
Author redpillschool
Upvotes 818
Comments 148
Date 02 October 2018 02:05 AM UTC (1 year ago)
Subreddit TheRedPill
Link https://theredarchive.com/post/52790
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/9kmp3y/the_reddit_administration_recants/
Similar Posts

Red Pill terms found in post:
the red pill
Comments

[–]∞ Mod | RP Vanguardbsutansalt[M] [score hidden] stickied comment (38 children) | Copy

I'm still amused at the unintended consequences of all of this. The Streisand Effect is real. TRP has largely been apolitical, but in one grandiose example of shooting themselves in the foot the left has damn near turned a 300,000 strong subreddit into a veritable Political Action Committee.

And not just ours, but several other subreddits who are aghast at the censorship that's happening. We're talking about 300,000 here, another 250,000 or so at /MensRights, a fuckton at /Mgtow, and the list goes on. Hell, even some subs that hate the strawman they believe we are have taken to our defense. Way to energize the base of your opposition!

This is why I don't think we'll see a blue wave in November. Every attempt at shutting down conservatives, or really just anyone the left disagrees with, is making people realize just how bug nuts insane the political left has become.

[–]5Imperator_Red301 points302 points  (54 children) | Copy

Funniest part of that: The woman that said she believed that the population should be artificially set at only 10% male or some shit. Can she not see that that would lead to the ultimate patriarchy? Almost every dude would be living like a fucking warlord. They would literally give zero fucks about the women. Every woman would be part of a harem and would do literally anything their new daddy wanted.

Second funniest part: The idea that a civilization composed of 90% women would actually be able to sustain itself. HAHAHAHAHAHA. Good luck doing all those jobs that don't involve policing men's tone at work, indoctrinating children, or pushing paper around government bureaucracies. By day 3 the garbage would be overflowing onto the streets and shit water would be coming out of the pipes into their bath tubs.

Edit: Third funniest part: Leftists are now arguing under the banner of "it's a private company and it can do whatever it wants. You have no rights here." Gotta say I definitely did not see that about face coming.

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorVasiliyZaitzev118 points119 points  (13 children) | Copy

Can she not see that that would lead to the ultimate patriarchy?

The woman in question is a lesbian. She isn't thinking in terms of how that would impact heteroseuxals.

> By day 3 the garbage would be overflowing onto the streets

If men disappeared, civilization would last until the first oil change.

> Leftists are now arguing under the banner of "it's a private company and it can do whatever it wants.

Unless it involves trannies, muslims or some other 'oppression studies' group.

[–]∞ Mod | RP Vanguardbsutansalt54 points55 points  (6 children) | Copy

If men disappeared, civilization would last until the first oil change.

It wouldn't even take that long. We live in a "just in time" society with goods being delivered on a regular basis. The grocery stores would be empty in about 2 weeks, and from there... they begin to starve. The world would quickly find out what it's like for the poor living in Venezuela. How long it'll be before they start eating their pets is anybody's guess.

[–]antariusz12 points13 points  (0 children) | Copy

We don’t have to “guess”.

Fluffy the purse puppy owned by a New York City socialite would survive as long as pets survived in Venezuela.

Humans are humans.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4857008/Starving-Venezuelans-butcher-DOG-street-eat.html

[–]Selexus11 points12 points  (2 children) | Copy

Recent (unsubstantiated) reports her in the UK have indicated that the average household has 9 meals available in the house at any one time. That's 3 days worth of food before basic groceries need to be sourced (from empty stores)

Hence the understanding that during any form of disaster/extreme event we are 72hrs from social unrest.

I remember reading on a preppers site that a lot of governmental disaster planning revolves around this 72hrs window.

There was a TV mini series (mocumentary) about a decade ago that dealt with the fictional events that unfolded from a country wide blackout. Sure enough violence and social breakdown happened very quickly in their depiction of events.

[–]beginner_12 points13 points  (1 child) | Copy

On some level I actually understand preppers. I should for sure have more essential stuff stored from food, water, batteries, flashlights, gas,... but not everyone lives in the country side and can afford at least 1 large extra room for all the stuff.

EDIT: If you have the guts for it, all you need to store is guns and bullets. The rest you can then get for free.

[–]ParanoidKasparov1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Water is the important one. Cleaning and more importantly hydration knock you out after the first day if your doing anything physical in most of the U.S. It doesn't take a 10x10 room either unless you want to go extreme 6 month prepper. For most its just a filled up food pantry with non perishables and some sort of water purification setup enough for say a few weeks or month. Maybe a portable generator setup if you want to pay the electrician 400 bucks to set one up. I live in the Midwest and honestly every house here can and should have an independent power supply I.E. Generator solar etc. especially if you have family on medical devices Like I do. If we ever get to the point where its months until govt. food trucks show up its the guns time so the food part wont matter until you find yourself eating to much human.

[–]Senior Endorsed ContributorVasiliyZaitzev7 points8 points  (0 children) | Copy

I was making a subtle point, not providing a predictive measure.

All of this aside, if we have another Carrington Event, we’re pretty much fucked.

[–]Iamverydrunknow2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

stores would be empty in less than a day because of panic and corruption

[–]Endorsed Contributorvandaalen25 points26 points  (1 child) | Copy

Yeah. Just imagine what would happen if a privately owned business like i. e. a bakery refused to serve a gay couple for their weddi... Oh... Wait!

[–]DancesWithPugs12 points13 points  (0 children) | Copy

Small businesses cannot do as they will, that privilege is reserved for larger companies.

[–]textualintercourse16 points17 points  (0 children) | Copy

So they are now agreeing that the bakery didn't have to bake the goddamn fucking cake. Good to know.

[–]FrankVillain7 points8 points  (1 child) | Copy

If men disappeared, civilization would last until the first oil change.

Exactly. And if it wasn't for men, our ancestors would never have crossed the first fucking river.

[–]Rian_Stone5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy

deleted What is this?

[–]redaftrp1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

That's some short sighted thinking for sure...

[–]Pezotecom34 points35 points  (31 children) | Copy

A friend just said to me "it's their site, they can do whatever they want". Like, are you fucking kidding me? A platform designed to allow their users to share content is now censoring speech and all you have to say is that shit? I didn't even respond to the guy because that kind of argument leaves you no fucking way to have a decent conversation.

"Man I hate mondays"

"Monday will continue to be a day of the week."
THANKS FOR THE INSIGHT

[–]∞ Mod | RP Vanguardbsutansalt37 points38 points  (15 children) | Copy

A friend just said to me "it's their site, they can do whatever they want"

And to that you can say, 'Glad you think so. I hope you remember that the next time someone decides not to make a cake for someone.'

[–]5Imperator_Red35 points36 points  (14 children) | Copy

Rights are for women, gays, blacks, hispanics, and muslims, not me and you.

[–] points points | Copy

[permanently deleted]

[–]Knightofthewest5 points6 points  (9 children) | Copy

And you absolutely should. Anywhere there's strong, succesful men, you guys are next.

[–]4matting8 points9 points  (6 children) | Copy

When they're done with the white males, the hispanic and black men are next on the menu. It's only a matter of time.

We need to stand together.

[–]Winterknight824751255 points6 points  (4 children) | Copy

Heh, they ALREADY got the blacks, they destroyed our communities 20-30 odd years ago, pumping drugs into our communities, adding welfare to promote "Progress" i.e. co-dependancy, pumping our communities with tons of illegal immigration which pushes out the black population from jobs etc, then well there are drugs, might as well sell that, well, now the state can lock up all the men, which means no fathers which means rise of the matriarchy which equals the sorry state that the black community has been in since Nixon.

They're working on everyone else now, especially seeing how easy it was to destroy the black community. I wouldnt be suprised if they saw what happened and made their methods MORE efficient, and tweaked it so that they can have complete control over the men in all of western society

[–]4matting3 points4 points  (2 children) | Copy

Reminds me of an article I read a while back, I think it was on the negromanosphere.com. Basically the writer made the argument that what is happening and what is going to happen to America, already happened to black America.

I'll try to find it, and share it with you.

Edit: Found it. It was on returnofkings.com. I'm not from the US, so I'm curious to know what you think of this. http://www.returnofkings.com/2090/how-black-america-has-predicted-our-future

[–]Winterknight824751253 points4 points  (1 child) | Copy

Yeah, a lot of black people already know this. The black Community is a Matriarchy now. The same forces that created this are using similar tactics to control. . .men everywhere else. Obviously they aren't using the same tactics, just similar ones as they've probably learned/run into problems (like the first amendment). But the End game is control. That much is obvious.

[–]TheObservationalist0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Yeah they helped you black guys pretty much to death. Thank a liberal!

[–] points points | Copy

[permanently deleted]

[–]farshadnm1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

i thought this sub is for men in general, not just white Christians.

i get what you're saying though.

[–] points points | Copy

[permanently deleted]

[–]destraht9 points10 points  (0 children) | Copy

There is a good chance you'll have to get a new friend soonish.

[–]Endorsed Contributorvandaalen8 points9 points  (12 children) | Copy

A friend just said to me "it's their site, they can do whatever they want".

It's funny hiw libtards retread to the libertarian standpoint if it fits their narrative. It's even more funny, that nobody is arguing against the company's right to do whatever the fuck they want. We aren't arguing on a legislative level, but on a moral level and if a company with a product and a size like reddit should feel morally abliged to follow and implement the ideas that made the USA the country it is. Typing this as a German btw.

Completely letting aside the fact, that "dangerous" but wrong ideas should always be openly available so they can be discussed and refuted and so they loose the mystical aura that surrounds them. Provided you regard TRP as a place where dangerous and false ideas are spread.

[–]poohead30 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Wrongthink is suppressed not because it's offensive, but because it's usually true.

[–]shelteringloon0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy

The left you speak of is not the real left.

http://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2018/10/11/cens-o11.html

[–]Endorsed Contributorvandaalen0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy

What's that supposed to tell me?

[–]shelteringloon0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

that real leftists like the wsws abhor attempts to limit speech.

[–]Flawless440 points1 point  (7 children) | Copy

You're right, but there's no reason to resort to name calling. In a no bullshit forum, that's just bullshit.

[–] points points | Copy

[permanently deleted]

[–]Flawless441 point2 points  (4 children) | Copy

Lol.

You're the reason we can't have mature discussion.

[–]DannyDemotta0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy

"We", says Mr 1-Year Old account? That's rich.

We do things differently around here - always have, always will. Content is what matters. Bring content. Scattered insults, emojis here and there, goofy jokes, toilet humor. But overall content is what matters.

Nobody needs you here being a fuckhead concern trolling, gatekeeping and tone policing. Either you have something to add or keep your dicksuckers shut.

[–]Flawless441 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy

Man. The idea of not insulting people you're conversing with is not something discovered recently.

It improves quality, content, and let's people take you seriously.

You don't have to listen to me. You're welcome to rant about libtards and snowflakes and dick-whatever's. It just makes you look like a fool, and violates rule 5 of this subreddit.

Do not insult or harass members.

Posts & Comments

Debate the ideas, not the person. If you have a point to be made, make it with well reasoned rationale. Calling members "beta" or "bitch" brings the level of discourse down to preadolescent schoolyard bickering.

Also, individuals with special flairs are members of the community who have proven themselves to add valuable content to our forum. We want them to stay. If you try to make their participation unpleasant, you will be banned. Feel free to disagree with them, but do so with courtesy.

[–]Winterknight824751251 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy

No one is taking you seriously. Time for you to figure out why. We can't do it for you.

Good luck. . .?

[–]Flawless440 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

If quoting the rules doesn't do it for you, nothing will. Good luck to you too.

Here, you can have your passive aggressive questionmark back.

"?"

[–]nmagod6 points7 points  (2 children) | Copy

only 10% male

Hypergamy at its finest. I imagine she thinks men would be locked up in breeding chambers 18 hours of every day, never stopping their work to produce more women to oppress the male population.

[–]4matting2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

South Park had an episode about this, where men are kept underground on Mars, and milked for their sperm and jokes.

[–]SKRedPill2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

Speaking of patriarchy, that complaint that life's never good enough is eternal, because there are no extrinsic solutions into intrinsic problems.

[–]AnonymousTSCM2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

Well if the population was only 10% men imagine how much you could charge for an oil change. $300 per oil change and only do two oil changes per day. Be making $600 a day for an hour of work.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

They don't tend to understand economics. Not surprising a supply/demand issue wouldn't be on their radar.

[–]1Noblefiz108 points109 points  (13 children) | Copy

I'm glad you are our moderator, dude. Thank you for all your hard work.

In response to your question, I currently do not believe any of the Reddit admin are in any position to dictate to their users what the "truth" is, or how to be a "man". Both are subjective.

The reddit admin need to understand what it means to be impartial and be able and willing to see multiple angles of a discussion before attempting to push their personal ideologies on their users.

Edit: a word

[–]coldcanyon20 points21 points  (0 children) | Copy

If I was a spindly little pencil-neck nerd and my wife was one of the studliest he-man athletes on the planet, I would stfu about how to be a man. But that's just me.

[–]Endorsed ContributorAuvergnat11 points12 points  (8 children) | Copy

The admins know this. That's why this sub has survived so far. Problem is more the fact that having a platform where "hate speech" is supported is not good for bringing in advertisers. So they gotta find a way to shut it down, while still promoting impartiality... Not easy.

[–]ANGRY_ATHEIST23 points24 points  (7 children) | Copy

where "hate speech" is supported is not good for bringing in advertisers

Advertisers target women, because women buy more than 80% of all goods and services. This is an interesting fact considering the supposed "wage gap". How is it that men make 70%+ of the income, yet more than 80% of the money is spent by women? It's not difficult to do the math there.

Since women are the main targets for advertising, any platform that goes against the female sexual strategy becomes not as profitable for most advertisers. Like it or not, this is more than likely just a business decision on admin's part.

There's probably some deeper RP truths in all that, but I'll let someone more endorsed do that write-up (if it hasn't been done already)

[–]Lib3rtarianSocialist4 points5 points  (4 children) | Copy

How is it that men make 70%+ of the income, yet more than 80% of the money is spent by women? It's not difficult to do the math there.

The wage gap is a myth. But if you meant the above proves that, then no. Don't use that argument against a feminist in case they use a little logic and then it'll be embarrassing for you when otherwise you'd be right.

[–]ANGRY_ATHEIST6 points7 points  (3 children) | Copy

The wage gap is only a myth in the way it's applied by feminists. Men DO make more money than women overall, but that is because more men work than women do. They try to say that it's because women are paid less to do the same work that men do, which is the myth.

[–]Lib3rtarianSocialist3 points4 points  (2 children) | Copy

Correct. But look at the words too. Wage gap means difference is wage, which doesn't exist. There is instead an earnings gap.

[–]ANGRY_ATHEIST2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy

That's why I put "wage gap" in quotes.

[–]TrainedHelplessness1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

There's this classic piece: https://thelastpsychiatrist.com/2014/05/cyberbll.html

If women are unsafe on the internet, as recipients of bullying and death threats, wouldn't the easy solution be to promote anonymous accounts for women?

That doesn't work, because companies need to advertise to women and know who they are. So they implement real names policies and we get articles associating anonymity with creepy male behavior.

[–]Rian_Stone0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

deleted What is this?

[–]NomBok0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy

Oh but the new thing going around is the left using the term "his truth" and "her truth". THE truth is no longer required. Because everyone apparently must be believed now.

[–]eclectro0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

reddit admin need to understand what it means to be impartial and be able and willing to see multiple angles of a discussion

They all live in the bubble that San Francisco and its people manages to provide. I really think reddit would be an entirely different place if they moved the headquarters to someplace like Iowa.

[–] points points | Copy

[permanently deleted]

[–]1empatheticapathetic35 points36 points  (1 child) | Copy

Please use paragraphs next time bro.

[–]xrKles16 points17 points  (0 children) | Copy

Good enough comment that i will excuse the blob

[–]the-dan-man1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy

Frankly, i do not think it will be as good as you make out. I myself feel alienated and increasingly more alone in a world which seems more and more full of lies. Being made aware of certain truths and the inner workings of the world does not make you feel more free or powerful. In my eyes it gives you an extra burden and responsibility.

[–]4matting0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Keep learning, and working on self improvement. Every day you will become better at navigating this clown world, and you will have an opportunity to thrive.

You have an opportunity to succeed over those who seek to live with their heads in the sand.

[–]TRP VanguardWhisper65 points66 points  (13 children) | Copy

The truth is that reddit staff didn't give this more than thirty seconds worth of thought. Some butthurt intern wanted to answer back, using root access instead of a regular comment or post, and googled the first thing xe could find that contradicted us.

Lo, and behold, it turned out that this was composed of the ideas of a creepy harrasser, a genocide advocate, a man hater, and a domestic abuse apologist. And that's just two people.

Anyone think that's a coincidence?

100% of our ideological opponents are morally bankrupt. All of them. The ones who appear clean just haven't been caught yet. Everything they accuse us of, they themselves are guilty of.

DARVO: Deny, Attack, Reverse Victim and Offender. This is what they do.

/u/spez doesn't care about any of that, of course. He's not truly ashamed because the possibility has never entered his tiny, self-absorbed mind that he might, just might be wrong. No, he's not ashamed, he's only embarrassed.

He just doesn't want to look bad.

That's why the link silently vanished, with no retraction or apology. He doesn't have the courage to take responsibility for his mistakes, or those of the team that reports to him. He is every inch the disgusting spineless manchild that his physical appearance would suggest. Stereotypes exist for a reason.

That is why there can never be a debate or open dialogue with this sort of leftist human headache. Not simply because they lack the imagination and mental discipline to imagine someone else's worldview, but because they are so lacking in courage that they bear to sit and listen to someone contradict them, even for long enough to await their turn to speak.

Being contradicted fills them with such pain that they cannot imagine the source of it to be anything but pure evil.

  • This will never be resolved.
  • No reddit staff will ever address this community directly in any medium that permits a response, unless that response can be shamelessly ignored.
  • The ban, when it happens, will happen silently and without warning.

The good news is that we don't need them. We only ever used their resources out of convenience, not necessity. We have among us all the expertise and initiative required to build for ourselves whatever we need.

All you have to do is show willing.

[–]textualintercourse8 points9 points  (3 children) | Copy

Spez helped off his sane freedom of speech pal. He doesn't give a fuck about anything, Cold Blooded sociopath.

[–]Rian_Stone1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy

deleted What is this?

[–]textualintercourse1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

"Suicided" is the proper term.

[–]Winterknight824751250 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

You misspelled Murdered wrong.

[–]4matting2 points3 points  (7 children) | Copy

Their vain attempts to silence us will only make us stronger. I would love to see how much our community has grown in the last few days.

edit: spelling

[–]Rian_Stone0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

deleted What is this?

[–]theadj12337 points38 points  (3 children) | Copy

I messaged the admins about this the day it happened and got a 3 day suspension. I am now following up on why I was banned for 'harassment' when nothing I said met the Reddit TOS for harassment, unless 'messaging an admin something they don't like' is now harassment. No /u/bsutansalt there will not be a blue wave, it will be a fucking red tsunami.

[–]Lib3rtarianSocialist3 points4 points  (2 children) | Copy

it will be a fucking red tsunami.

Behold, the Bolshevik revolution!

[–]Winterknight824751251 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

wwaaaaaiiit a minute there buddy.

[–]mette1331 points32 points  (6 children) | Copy

I'd chop my dick off if the Admin actually left a decent apology.

[–]Modredpillschool[S] 56 points57 points  (5 children) | Copy

Don't say that- it might actually make them apologize!

[–]Omnibrad34 points35 points  (2 children) | Copy

They will never apologize because they don't think they're doing anything wrong.

[–]Modredpillschool[S] 31 points32 points  (1 child) | Copy

Well they did just remove their mistake so there's another tacit admission...

[–]jcrpta5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy

Thing is, in their world the mistake wasn't pointing potential readers at the opinion of someone who thinks there's no such thing as domestic violence against men.

Their mistake was pointing potential readers at the opinion of someone who's been accused of sexual harassment.

[–]Pezotecom7 points8 points  (0 children) | Copy

Since their goal is avoiding us to be men apparentely

[–]TRP VanguardHumanSockPuppet0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Worse yet - by chopping off his dick /u/mette13 would become one of them.

[–]Gimmick_puppet21 points22 points  (0 children) | Copy

In the Reddit Admins minds, your takedown only reinforces their beliefs. Exposing their errors and backwards thinking will only make them more sure about their "correct thinking" because only a truly horrible person would question their beliefs.

[–]CainPrice18 points19 points  (2 children) | Copy

I think that the removal of that stupid link wasn't the Reddit administration "recanting", but correcting an obvious error. That link to Stoney Brook made the quarantine of The Red Pill look very obviously personal.

If Reddit just did a general content review and made a list: "Here are 27 subreddits that violate our non-quarantined content policies and qualify for quarantine", then quarantined the list of subreddits, that would appear professional and impersonal.

But when somebody sticks a link to a liberal, feminized, healthy masculinity university program on the quarantine page for The Red Pill, that demonstrates that the quarantine wasn't some professional, impersonal enforcement of content policies. It was personal.

Whoever posted that link wasn't some office administrator who was enforcing content policies. It was somebody who intimately knew what The Red Pill was supposed to about and was posting an alternative source. Essentially saying, "Yup. I'm quarantining you assholes. And here's a link for how to be real men, instead of being losers like you."

With the Stoney Brook link on the quarantine notice, it was clear that the quarantine wasn't mere administrative content enforcement, but a very personal attack from someone who knew what The Red Pill was about and disagreed with the viewpoints.

I don't think the removal of the link is the administration recanting. They're just backpedaling from an emotional response by whatever administrator or intern pushed the quarantine button and typed the notice, to try to make the quarantine appear more official and impersonal, and less of a personal opinionated attack.

[–]Limekill7 points8 points  (0 children) | Copy

Whoever posted that link wasn't some office administrator who was enforcing content policies. It was somebody who intimately knew what The Red Pill was supposed to about and was posting an alternative source. Essentially saying, "Yup. I'm quarantining you assholes. And here's a link for how to be real men, instead of being losers like you."

I concur. Thats why I abandoned reddit - because I could feel this was coming.

[–]Terdmuffin1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

It was somebody who intimately knew what The Red Pill was supposed to about and was posting an alternative source. Essentially saying, "Yup. I'm quarantining you assholes. And here's a link for how to be real men, instead of being losers like you." With the Stoney Brook link on the quarantine notice, it was clear that the quarantine wasn't mere administrative content enforcement, but a very personal attack from someone who knew what The Red Pill was about and disagreed with the viewpoints.

I think it was more than that. I think it was done to antagonize us into lashing out so we would make ourselves look bad. An ettrmpt to garner justification not just for the quarantine but for an outright ban. I think we were being baited.

[–]Nov5160515 points16 points  (0 children) | Copy

I don't think the reddit admins have the ovaries to admit they are / were wrong for this..

[–]furcryingoutloud13 points14 points  (2 children) | Copy

This may sound weird, but I actually like that little quarantined tag. It kind of makes the sub look badass.

Personally, I am not political. Oh I have my opinions, but they don't have anything to do with left or right, top or bottom. To me, all this arguing about parties and left and right is just political rhetoric to keep people fighting amongst themselves and have the stage set for them to do what they want, as usual.

There is a small group of people who actually make decisions about what path the world is taking. Whether inadvertently or in collusion, it always boils down to real power is always based in a small group. Does anyone here think that the people with real power give a shit about who we like and don't like? The left and the right?

The left and right are simply terms that are exploited to keep the flock arguing about nothing while the decision makers are left alone to decide for the rest of us. Look at the big picture guys. The big picture is what it has always been. If you don't look out for yourself, nobody will do it for you.

[–]omega_dawg9310 points11 points  (1 child) | Copy

this. this. this.

thank you for typing what i also think. in the USA, EVERYTHING has to be put in a little 'box' so one side can identify with it or against it.

even when talking about POSITIVE MASCULINITY, there are multiple users who HAVE to label it as left or right. why? when does being a man align with political views?

the real issue is feminism. instead of trying to claim positive masculinity for political purposes, MEN need to step-up and stop feminism from killing femininity; it can't kill masculinity.

[–]TRP VanguardWikisnack23 points24 points  (0 children) | Copy

The quarantine is ostensibly a result of moral judgement by the admins that this sub teaches evil. Their utter lack of commitment toward addressing the supposed moral iniquity, first posting a half assed rebuke in the form of an poorly vetted talking head, then removing it, deepens the sense that they aren't quite sure what part of the communities content they are meant to disagree with.

It is their duty, their absolute moral obligation to shine a public light on what they see wrong with our speech before they snuff it out.

[–]Trainmasta12 points13 points  (0 children) | Copy

/u/Sp3z is possibly a bigger cuck than Trudeau which is quite an achievement

[–]textualintercourse9 points10 points  (0 children) | Copy

Only the weak must censor. Only the weak are afraid of ideas. Only the weak are afraid of the free exchange of information. Only the weak stifle dissent through authoritarian heavy handed tactics. Only the weak are afraid of strength.

If any of you motherfuckers vote for the "pussy hat"/SJW/Antifa representative candidate, expect much much more of the same. This is some Orwellian Bolshevik level bullshit going on.

[–]batfish556 points7 points  (0 children) | Copy

Siwwy wabbit, you can't abuse men! Men are the abusers! /s

[–]AllahHatesFags7 points8 points  (0 children) | Copy

This is all just sjw admins throwing a hissy fit over Kavanaugh. I really hope there is a supreme court case that bans this kind of censorship by companies like reddit, Facebook, Google, etc. and the ruling is written by Kavanaugh.

[–]Herdsengineers4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy

I'll say it again, the Liberal/Progress Democrat agenda is about enforcing conformity with their ideals and vision of what society should be. They are couching it in other terms like equality and justice, but it's really just them fooling the masses and getting the masses to conform to their agenda by appealing to the greedy side of human nature (wealth envy and class warfare), and fooling people with emotional arguments not based on fact (modern feminism).

I'm starting to see signs people are waking up though, especially with just how outrageously and obviously false these Kavanaugh accusations have been. The masses are at least scratching their heads, seeing something's not right. Now might be just the time when they're open to other ideas if someone can present it in a way that doesn't come across as just another angry, male, racist woman hating guy.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (7 children) | Copy

Who here thinks the admin have the proper judgment to be able to tell them what they should and should not read?

I'm still shocked >unnamed sub< hasn't been banned. After Charlottesville there was an endless stream of calls for violence against "Nazis".

Many people, including myself, made calls for calm, that having an activist group present throwing items and injuring protesters was more likely the reason behind one individual feeling aggrieved than some ideology. And we were permanently banned from >unnamed sub< for being, according to the moderators, "Nazi sympathiser".

You can't make this up: arguing against incitement of violence resulted in bans from >unnamed sub<.

The administrators, of course, must know that >unnamed sub< is an active hate sub which condones incitement to violence. Yet there's been no quarantining of that sub. Even though that sub breaks a major rule of the site.

[–]BlackFallout6 points7 points  (2 children) | Copy

Can I have a clue what sub that is?

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy

The bot removes any references to other subs, presumably because the sub is viewed with enough suspicion by the admins.

I'd love to be explicit but let's just say it's a main (default) sub and it centres around discussions that pertain to non-US events - although US events do find their way into that sub anyway.

[–]BlackFallout0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Ah I know what it is

[–]loveladee3 points4 points  (3 children) | Copy

at what point is the redpill ever pro-nazi. Half the time the people on this sub are saying that race doesn't fucking matter, and that is always about improving yourself as a male. I could understand the accusations of misogyny , but like i've never seen this place as "alt-right" or "neo-nazi". I read fucking Marx and leftist shit constantly. What's with all this political catch-alling?

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

My comment wasn't about redpill, it was a different sub. And it wasn't about Naziism, it was about calls for violence being tolerated, even condoned, on other main subs, yet in spite of that being a very clear breach of site rules - it is this sub that gets quarantined.

The point is the admins are not applying the rules equally and fairly. In fact the site rules are largely a complete joke and don't mean anything.

It's like most legal jurisdictions where the law is so vague and unequally applied that whether or not you go to prison comes largely down to whether you happened to annoy the wrong (powerful) person or not.

[–]jimmahtimmah2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

I mean, hasn't reddit always kinda been a joke? this is just further confirmation.

[–]fmanly4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy

Who here thinks the admin have the proper judgment to be able to tell them what they should and should not read?

More like, who thinks that ANYBODY should be able to tell them what they should and should not read? If you're into that sort of thing, just go start a review blog somewhere.

I can't say I agree with everything on this sub, but this Orwellian nonsense is probably going to red-pill more men than anything in your sidebar...

[–]the-dan-man3 points4 points  (2 children) | Copy

Hey guys, i just found out about the quarantine. And got VERY worried when i tried to see the subreddit on my mobile, to only find it unlisted.

So, I am a bit late to the game here. What is the plan? It seems to me, that we are rapidly losing the fight here. Mostly because we do not see free-thinking as somethign we should have to fight for. It is truly truly worrying times for men. When social spaces for us to interact and share ideas die out.

Personally, i am in a difficult time in my life. And the fact that censorship and the shutting down of ideas and anythign resembling masculinity online and in the media, only makes me more isolated in my social and personal life.

Anyway, what is the plan? What are peoples thoughts? 300k subscribers is a LOT. Are we going to just sit here and wait until the subreddit is banned? Roosh is leaving too. The manosphere seems to be dying. What is going on?

We need some leaders, badly. Ones that are not afriad to stand up and speak out and suffer the consequences against the tide.

[–]jcrpta1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

It's way too late.

Reddit's already framed any appeal in terms of "you're guilty; persuade us that you're going to change your wicked ways".

[–]ReasonFreak0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Roosh isn't really leaving he's just moving on to different things.

[–]Pepethe1stofHisName1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

I've been a victim of domestic violence. /u/spez doesn't believe in my right to be heard or exist

[–]thoughtcourier3 points4 points  (2 children) | Copy

Dropped in to say that I subscribed just because I heard this sub-reddit was "quarantined" (see: censored -- I couldn't access this on mobile).

I never subscribed because, back when I looked through this subreddit, I agreed with maybe 10% of what is said in here and say maybe 25% of posts are hate speech or borderline and I don't want that negativity in my life. But people deserve to read and decide for themselves. TRP is also a gateway to various male right movements (MRA, Asian Masculinity, MGTOW, incels) where those who don't exactly agree with TRP can go.

Anyway, I'm sure one of you guys have said it better than me and I already know y'all have backup plans for when the other shoe drops. Just dropping in for support. Proud now to rep "Yeah, I read TRP", to anyone who dares to ask.

[–]SoulRedemption2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy

As much as you your thoughts are appreciated it's best not mention in real life you read TRP. Unless you are openly and overtly standing up for Mens rights. Even then, saying you follow TRP leaves a bad taste in everyone's mind. It's because people have it wrong. Do be careful.

[–]theglassisbroken22 points3 points  (3 children) | Copy

Remember when Reddit's co-founder bragged about free speech? When asked what the Founding Fathers would have thought of reddit: "A bastion of free speech on the World Wide Web? I bet they would like it[...]" - Alexis Ohanian

...only to make a complete U-turn later on? "Neither Alexis nor I created reddit to be a bastion of free speech, but rather as a place where open and honest discussion can happen." - spez

I remember, and it's what brought me to this site in the first place.

I won't be surprised if they make another U-turn and argue "Neither Alexis nor I created reddit to be a place where open and honest discussion can happen."

[–]DancesWithPugs2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

Riddle me this. How can you have an open and honest discussion without free speech?

[–]Winterknight824751250 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy

Well Alex... just look him up.

[–]dogkindrepresent1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

I can literally hear him turning in his grave.

[–]DancesWithPugs2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

Apparently I don't exist, no such thing as male abuse victims and I am one if the '0' subscribers.

Eat a hairball, reddit.

I guess y'all want me to keep sliding conservative? If this is the new "New Left" I'm out. Liberals were supposed to be about embracing freedom of choice and diversity, not mass shaming based on transparent bigotry.

If I call myself a liberal or Democrat these days will people think I support a totalitarian thought control culture and corporate state? I thought that was supposed to be a Republican ideal. Ehhh, it's all crap now, they don't support the people. They bicker in public, fake fights, and then rob us in secret.

Political parties won't save you.

[–]FrankVillain9 points10 points  (0 children) | Copy

Everyday, Trump is a bit more re-elected.

[–]plascra1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Grotesque lack of critical thinking. Really.

[–]666Evo1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Recant isn't the word I'd have used...

[–]novalentineforyou1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Some things are subjective. The existence of male victims of abuse is not subjective. Fuck you, Reddit admins.

[–]roguefreezemission1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy

Stony Brook, NY? And you actually thought i was gonna read that shit? brah

[–]TheStoicCrane1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

It's as bad a New Paltz, NY. A liberal tye dye circus. Knew some half decent chicks that left for a NY State Campus and came back to town looking like soft faced dudes wkith buzzcuts.

All of the SUNYs are little more than state funded indoctrination camps. Stony Brook is no exception.

[–]MeanCaregiver1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

plot twist Reddit is run by women

[–]RegularExcuse1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

I don't think you should insult them for admitting they were wrong, always encourage people to admit mistakes and don't punish them when they do otherwise they get resentful. Good luck.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (3 children) | Copy

Why dont we create our own website and transfer all our community and the great knowledge that has been dropped here over to the new site and we can do our own thing. That way we own our voice??

[–]Modredpillschool[S] 2 points3 points  (2 children) | Copy

Awesome idea. Make sure to sign up: https://www.trp.red

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy

Hey cool registered. How come this is not being promoted?

[–]Modredpillschool[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

I mean I think we are promoting it! I'm not entirely certain how people are missing it, since it's stickied in our addresses and on the sidebar and in a lot of EC's posts.

[–]TheMadKnightRides1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy

Long time RP lurker here.

This subreddit has helped me come to uncomfortable, but useful and transformative conclusions about my own life and society at large. It's helped me become a better version of myself and create positive momentum not only in my own life, but also in the lives of several people around me.

That being said, is there any way we can take some action against this quarantining? Whether that's signing an open letter or a forum where we can share positive transformations that young men have experienced as a result of this forbidden knowledge; I feel compelled to contribute what I can to combat this shortsighted, inane act of censorship.

There's been a lot of talk in this thread and others about the Streisand Effect and the effects censorship has on energizing a dormant base. I can unequivocally say that this has lit a fire for me. But how can we actually help?

[–]TheMadKnightRides0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Also, would definitely like to find a solution to accessing TRP on mobile. If anyone has a workaround (other than Forums.Red and TRP.Red both of which seem to be a likely future for us anyway) please post it here so people can see!

[–]SmamelessMe1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

The worst part is I always thought that MGTOW, MRA and TRP subreddits are eventually going to get purged, because of the eventual turn to family friendliness of companies that want to maximize their profit.

But all this time I thought TRP will be the last light to go, since it deals "only" with social skills and self-improvement.

I am still trying to wrap my head around why out of "openly political" MRA, "pointing out women are dangerous" MGTOW and "be the best you can, and become attractive to women as side effect" TRP, reddit decided to go for TRP's neck first.

Where does that leave us? Did they try to test the waters of the manospehere, by pick up seemingly least political sub, to see what the reaction would be? Or do they see us as the most dangerous one, because we point out uncomfortable truths about female psychology?

I always thought I would never involve myself with the political aspect of manospehere, sticking to self-improvement aspect of TRP, and self-preservation aspect of MGTOW. It always seemed to me that the "forces that be" only really had problem with the vocal political aspect of manosphere. Treating the self-improvement part of it with indifference, or at most as a butt of their jokes.

But right now, it is starting to dawn on me that what they have a problem with is the idea of masculinity itself. Or rather, that no matter how progressive women want to be, they still find masculinity attractive. The MRA and MGTOW being a manifestation of that masculinity.

Is it perhaps because they couldn't change women, they decided to change men?

As it seems, we may not have the luxury of choosing to sit this one out.

[–]Ratcheta-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy

To think I almost attended Stony Brook.. Granted, engineering is not "men's studies", but still.

That said, I do not think anyone has the moral authority to declare their viewpoint correct without any supporting documentation from multiple, repeated experiments. And even then that doesn't give you the right to shut down opposition because your view may not hold forever as new evidence may come to light.

The line between people shitposting insensitive jokes and discussing sensitive topics is fine but both should be allowed in their respective spaces. Your speech is free, but if you shout n-bombs in a predominantly black neighborhood, expect consequences. Shout it in private or among friends? No one should care.

[–]Odins-left-eye1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy

Meh. I can't be the victim of abuse. This whole pity party shit doesn't fit our MO. We aren't MRAs; we're fucking vikings. We're the assholes that niceguys who consider themselves "victims" like to complain women always pick over them.

At least we used to be, back when I used this sub frequently. I guess I shouldn't presume what it's become in the past year.

[–]TRP VanguardWhisper28 points29 points  (0 children) | Copy

You are incorrect, though sloppy thinking.

You cannot be the victim of abuse. Other men can.

It is not size and strength that protect you from abuse. It is your social ability to stand up for yourself, or leave. The fact that some men do not have this ability is the sort of reason that TRP exists at all. We are here to teach men to seize back their own power and teach them to stand up for themselves.

The goal is to turn men back into fucking vikings.

Now do you understand?

[–]rukken0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy

Is the quarantine gone? I can view this on my phone. Wasn't possible when quarantined

[–]DancesWithPugs0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

As long as it says 0 subscribers it is quarantined.

[–]Starfuckingman0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Damn, easy on the guy. He might get mad and press the button delete by a mistake lmao. And yes, I know we are ready for it but man, I love our reddit redpill community.

[–]choontang-1 points0 points  (1 child) | Copy

u/spez is a fucking homo, he gets butt fucked by Tyrone every night

[–]ahackercalled4chan6 points7 points  (0 children) | Copy

c'mon now. you know Tyrone has better standards than that...

[–]Demiurge_Decline-2 points-1 points  (1 child) | Copy

I see this differently. I think there is a REDPILL admin Mole or two at heart that secretly decided to act as a double agent and place that particular tongue and cheek link for two-fold reasonings. This tells me the ban does not come from the lower admins but from those even higher up and the admins themselves more than likely men have read as much information and are advent readers of REDPILL. Thus secret followers of the ideaology. So reading between the lines, the link/line was purposely put there as tongue and cheek against reddits higher uppers by a redpill Mole only to force it back down quickly. Which is what they wanted anyway. Thanks Admin. This is "Q" level espionage. I like it. We have some insiders but I fear its not enough...

[–]Rian_Stone4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy

deleted What is this?

[–] points points | Copy

[permanently deleted]

[–] points points | Copy

[permanently deleted]



You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2020. All rights reserved.

created by /u/dream-hunter