TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • Other

      • /r/AllPillDebate
      • /r/AlreadyRed
      • /r/altTRP
      • /r/AntiFeminists
      • /r/askFDS
      • /r/askMRP
      • /r/askRPC
      • /r/becomeaman
      • /r/BlackPillScience
      • /r/Chadfish
      • /r/Divorce_Men
      • /r/EverydayMisandry
      • /r/ExRedPill
      • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
      • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
      • /r/GEOTRP
      • /r/MalePsychology
      • /r/Male_Studies
      • /r/MenSupportMen
      • /r/MGTOW2
      • /r/MuslimRedPill
      • /r/newTRP
      • /r/PussyPass
      • /r/PussyPassDenied
      • /r/RedPillBooks
      • /r/RedPillParenting
      • /r/RedPillWives
      • /r/RedPillWomen
      • /r/RedPillWorkplace
      • /r/RPChristians
      • /r/ThankTRP
      • /r/TheRedPillStories
      • /r/trpGAME
      • /r/TRPOffTopic
      • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
      • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • A Voice for Men
    • Dalrock
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Heartiste
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • Return of Kings
    • The Power Moves
    • The Rational Male
    • The Spearhead
    • Other

      • Alpha Game
      • Archwinger
      • Artful Prudence
      • Black Label Logic
      • Caleb Jones
      • Captain Capitalism
      • Corporate Machiavelli
      • Days of Game
      • Deep Strength
      • Dicipres
      • Donal Graeme
      • Female Misogynist
      • Free Northerner
      • Gaming My Wife
      • Hawaiian Libertarian
      • Illimitable Men
      • In Mala Fide
      • Justice for Men and Boys
      • Kill Your Inner Loser
      • KillToParty
      • Krauser PUA
      • LaidNYC
      • Mensactivism
      • NO MA'AM
      • Omega Virgin Revolt
      • Pook's Mill
      • Random Xpat Rantings
      • Red Pill Theory
      • Red Pill Wifery
      • RedPillDad
      • RedPillDoctor
      • Rian Stone
      • RooshV
      • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
      • Sigma Frame
      • The Feminine Woman
      • The Futurist
      • The Masculine Principle
      • The Modern Man
      • The New Modern Man
      • The Obsidian Files
      • The Private Man
      • The Red Pill Room
      • The Red Quest
      • The Rules Revisited
      • Troy Francis
      • Wintery Knight
      • Woujo
      • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Support

Alabama bill would criminalize false rape accusations...Good on you, Alabama!

IAmTotallyAJohnSmith

April 23, 2020
4194 upvotes
/r/MensRights
https://www.al.com/politics/2019/05/alabama-bill-would-criminalize-false-rape-accusations.html
Archived from /r/MensRights

r/MensRights is a community advocating for the social and legal equality of men and boys since 2008.

TheRedArchive is an archive of Red Pill subreddits and blogs. This page is our copy of the original post.

/r/MensRights archive

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Support the archive

Everything here was supposed to disappear. Banned subreddits, deleted communities, cancelled blogs — much of what is archived here survives nowhere else.

It stays free — no paywall, no account — for the next man who comes looking, the way it was free for you.

I pay for the servers, the storage and the bandwidth myself. If you want this record still standing in ten years, become one of the people who keeps it online.

Support the archive

Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title Alabama bill would criminalize false rape accusations...Good on you, Alabama!
Author

IAmTotallyAJohnSmith

Upvotes 4194
Comments 220
Date April 23, 2020 2:24 PM UTC
(6 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/g6njr9/alabama_bill_would_criminalize_false_rape/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/alabama-bill-would-criminalize-false-rape.854264
https://theredarchive.com/post/854264
Red Pill terms in post
false rape accusation
Top posts by IAmTotallyAJohnSmith

These women don't want equality. They want inequality, and inequality for themselves.

188 upvotes
April 15, 2020
/r/MensRights

Virginia bans conversion therapy for LGBTQ children

12 upvotes
March 5, 2020
/r/MensRights

Comments

[–]xdzgor 491 points492 points493 points 6 years ago (39 children) | Copy Link

TBH I thought false allegations of anything was an offence.

[–]Dogrose22 200 points201 points202 points 6 years ago (24 children) | Copy Link

I don’t know about other countries but in the UK it isn’t an offence in itself, the few who are prosecuted are charged with perverting the course of justice. It would be a tremendous step forward in ensuring justice for victims of false allegations if it were to be made an offence. Fingers crossed.

[–]tenchineuro 38 points39 points40 points 6 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

I don’t know about other countries but in the UK it isn’t an offence in itself, the few who are prosecuted are charged with perverting the course of justice.

That, or wasting police time. Nether is a felony as far as I know.

[–]bmskyped 23 points24 points25 points 6 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

I know in Israel, you aren’t allowed to question if it’s false. A true “guilty until proven innocent” scenario

[–]luvhos 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Source?

[–]bmskyped 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

If you look up Gil Ronen, you can see his legacy as a familist, a party that represents rights of divorced men. He commonly connects sexual assault / rape allegations to divorced men because it enables the women to have the upper hand in divorce proceedings. You can read more about in in the Jerusalem Post.

[–]luvhos 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Thanks

[–]dbgb1986 4 points5 points6 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Meanwhile, Israel makes divorce VERY difficult for women. I highly suggest a film called Gett. It's a bit slow, but hey, it's a great drama. Also, the woman who stars it in was an AMAZING actress. Rest In Peace. She was truly beautiful and talented.

I just looked her up. Her name is: Ronit Elkabetz

Sorry for the tangent, but I always like an excuse to suggest a good movie!

[–]wrekd 18 points19 points20 points 6 years ago (16 children) | Copy Link

I gotta disagree. Most places already have laws for making false reports/statements. The problem is they are not used. Our criminal code is already massively bloated. We already had the tools and they were not used. What good is adding another tool that won't be used?

[–]flyingwolf 19 points20 points21 points 6 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

I gotta disagree. Most places already have laws for making false reports/statements. The problem is they are not used. Our criminal code is already massively bloated. We already had the tools and they were not used. What good is adding another tool that won't be used?

Those of us in the pro-second amendment community have been making this same argument for a long time.

[–]cld8 -4 points-3 points-2 points 6 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

I sincerely hope this sub isn't going to be run over by some second-amendment nutcases.

[–]flyingwolf 2 points3 points4 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I sincerely hope this sub isn't going to be run over by some second-amendment nutcases.

This sub is about rights and equality. If you don't like either, take a hike.

[+]Justathrowawayoh1 points 6 years ago* [recovered] (8 children) | Copy Link

most gun owners are men so gun grabber bullshit would mostly effect men

most gun grabber bullshit is pushed with antimale crap, too

come to think of it, we really should talk more about it!

[–]cld8 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

Nothing will turn people into feminists faster than MRAs being taken over by the gun lobby.

MRAs already have an (undeserved) reputation of being right-wing extremists, and this is only going to add to that narrative.

[+]Justathrowawayoh1 points 6 years ago* [recovered] (6 children) | Copy Link

this isn't really about "other people" and "their perceptions"

this is about you and a shitlib political position you have

you want to know what will turn men away from MRA? if they only talk about shitlib nonsense instead of being willing to talk about any issue which effects men

[–]cld8 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago* (5 children) | Copy Link

this is about you and a shitlib political position you have

And it's also about you and a shitcon political position you have.

See, I can make insults too.

you want to know what will turn men away from MRA? if they only talk about shitlib nonsense instead of being willing to talk about any issue which effects men

If we're talking about any issue which effects men, let's talk about how American men are significantly more likely to be murdered than American women, and the government's failure to address this. Since the vast majority of murder victims are men, pushing for gun control is a men's rights issue.

See, I can hijack the movement as well.

[+]Justathrowawayoh1 points 6 years ago* [recovered] (4 children) | Copy Link

See, I can make insults too.

but are they accurate?

you can admit it; you have shitlib anti-gun political positions

pushing for gun control is a men's rights issue.

by violating the rights of mostly men!

bold move to attack innocent individual men to "protect men," but surely it will attract more men to MRA

[–]cld81 point 6 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

you can admit it; you have shitlib anti-gun political positions

you can admit it; you have shitcon pro-gun political positions

bold move to attack innocent individual men to "protect men," but surely it will attract more men to MRA

It will attract some and put off others. But in the end, the MRA won't be a men's movement anymore, it will just be a vehicle for gun rights groups to promote their views by using men as pawns.

[–]dbgb1986 8 points9 points10 points 6 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I see your point.

Here's what we can do:

We can replace the old false accusation laws with better false accusation laws, eliminate a bunch of stupid laws (such as those that criminalize weed and prostitution), and ENHANCE the penalties for false accusations, specifically those relating to sex crimes.

ALSO: Whenever a state (or U.S. Congress) passes a law like this, the media outlets notice, which means it can help the cause, bring up important dialogue, and maybe even make people THINK TWICE before falsely accusing a person of a sex crime.

So all in all, I'd say it's a win. But again, I do see your point. We should always consider the fact that we already have too many laws. So it's a matter of weighing the two realities. I hope that made sense!

[–]wrekd 2 points3 points4 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It did. Failure to act needs to be grounds for dismissal. Even if the are elected or appointed officials. And a dismissal should have an unelectable window following it. So these asses can't be immediately recycled.

[–]Deja_Siku 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Good way to put it.

[–]onitalaP 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It makes for a good headline.

[–]Chair_Toaster 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Perverting the course of justice is the offence. I’m not sure why there would need to be a specific offence.

[–][deleted] 54 points55 points56 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

For men, yes. Women are coddled children by law.

[+]ComeBackToDigg10 points 6 years ago [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link

Filing a false police report is already a crime, it's just that it is not enforced against women. This will be a new type of crime that is not enforced against women.

[–]Rollertoaster7 6 points7 points8 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Lmao

[–]theredhotske 5 points6 points7 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I was the subject of a false rape accusation. In my jurisdiction, Victoria, Australia, there is no penalty whatsoever for this behaviour.

[–]tenchineuro 6 points7 points8 points 6 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

TBH I thought false allegations of anything was an offence.

There is no specific offense of making a false rape accusation. The worst that could happen is that the DA could try her for some misdemeanor form of perjury. But DAs almost never do, they've had a drink of the feminist Kool-Aid and think it would make real rape victims unlikely to come forward.

[–]Halafax 6 points7 points8 points 6 years ago* (4 children) | Copy Link

The worst that could happen is that the DA could try her for some misdemeanor form of perjury. But DAs almost never do, they've had a drink of the feminist Kool-Aid have numerous reasons to avoid doing so.

Prosecutors aren't looking to make more work for themselves, pursuing perjury claims is not their primary mandate. The prosecutor's office is often a stepping stone to an appointment or political career, they don't want to have their names attached to bad press. Finally, they know better than anyone how much sympathy a woman can get from a court, they frequently use that against men on trial.

On the rare occasion that prosecutors bother going after perjury, it's specifically because the defendant pissed off a prosecutor. They don't care how much damage was done to victims, they care how much they were annoyed.

[–]tenchineuro 5 points6 points7 points 6 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

I've actually read where various DAs across the nation have stated that convicting a false rape accuser would make real rape victims less likely to come forward.

[–]Halafax 7 points8 points9 points 6 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

That's certainly the feminist mantra, that false accusers really harm female victims of rape, not the men they accuse.

But on average, prosecutors are just working the system as it exists. Pursuing a perjury charge is at the discretion of the prosecutor. Doing so takes resources away from work that isn't optional. Being attached to cases like that can attract negative publicity and harm their career. Pursuing a valid charge against a sympathetic defendant is high risk with no pay off.

Why would they go out of their way to do this?

[–]tenchineuro 5 points6 points7 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Pursuing a perjury charge is at the discretion of the prosecutor.

Trying any charge is at the discretion of the prosecutor.

Being attached to cases like that can attract negative publicity and harm their career.

I don't think it's as simple as that, as I recall the DA of the Kobe Bryant case ended up resigning.

Pursuing a valid charge against a sympathetic defendant is high risk with no pay off.

That may be the assumption, but since DAs don't prosecute these things there is no data either way.

Why would they go out of their way to do this?

It's not out of their way, it's literally their job.

[–]Halafax 2 points3 points4 points 6 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

Trying any charge is at the discretion of the prosecutor.

Some cases are much more optional than others. Under the current system, there is little to gain and potentially a lot to lose for pursuing these cases.

It's not out of their way, it's literally their job.

As things currently work, it's not. Prosecutors don't have to pursue perjury charges, and rarely do.

[–]MelkorHimself 2 points3 points4 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Filing a false police report in AL is a Class A misdemeanor, which can yield a punishment of up to one year in jail and/or a $6000 fine. This proposed bill would specifically make false sex crime accusations a Class C felony, which carries up to 10 years in prison and/or a $15000 fine.

[–]SharedRegime 3 points4 points5 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Filing false police reports is illegal in the US atleast yes the issue is it has to be proven to be false and the vast majority of cases of rape are just ended right at "no evidence" instead of "no evidence but this person might be lying so investigate them."

If this law does not in turn make a law that requires LE to investigate no evidence cases for falsehood then its pointless.

[–]Count_Dyscalculia 160 points161 points162 points 6 years ago (23 children) | Copy Link

How the hell was this NOT a crime already?

[–]MegaBRex 135 points136 points137 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

its not that its not a crime, its that its not its own crime. This is a bill to make it a felony that can be punished with up to 10 years in prison instead of the same punishment for reporting falsely that someone stole your rake.

Sort of the way that there is no law against stealing a car with a duck on your head, it would still be a crime to steal a car with a duck on your head.

[–]fatcowz479510 points 6 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

What the hell is this metaphor. Take my updoot.

[–]tenchineuro 8 points9 points10 points 6 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

How the hell was this NOT a crime already?

To be accurate, it's not a crime against the accused, it's a crime against the state. The falsely accused man is not recognized as a victim of anything and has no legal recourse.

[–]cld8 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

He may be able to obtain restitution as part of the criminal trial.

[–]tenchineuro 4 points5 points6 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

He may be able to obtain restitution as part of the criminal trial.

Which criminal trial? The woman, if tried, will be tried for a minor crime, a misdemeanor. And the man won't be party to that trial, at most he'd be called as a witness, but I doubt even that.

He is not legally a victim of anything.

[–]cld8 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Depends on the jurisdiction, but in many places, anyone harmed by a crime can request restitution as part of the criminal case if they don't want to file a separate civil case.

[–]LibertySeasonsSam 6 points7 points8 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's about time laws were passed to stem the tide of unsubstantiated rape allegations.

[–]tothecatmobile 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (15 children) | Copy Link

It is.

This is just some feel good legislation.

[–]pansimi 11 points12 points13 points 6 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link

Given how infrequently that any existing law against false allegations are enforced in the case of false rape allegations, this is clearly necessary.

[–]tothecatmobile -4 points-3 points-2 points 6 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link

The problem is how difficult it is to prove a false accusation.

[–]matrixislife 4 points5 points6 points 6 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

In a lot of ways, it's not that hard to prove. If you can prove person A is in one location, person B was in a completely different location at the same time, then obviously no assault could take place. It gets a lot trickier when you get to those "in the bedroom" rape allegations, but that cuts both ways, it's hard to prove rape with no witnesses in an intimate room.

With the really malicious false allegations usually they won't be in the same building though, so it's down to phone records, eye witnesses, or as in one particularly blatant case, baseball on national television.

[–]tothecatmobile 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

In a lot of ways, it's not that hard to prove. If you can prove person A is in one location, person B was in a completely different location at the same time

Well obviously, if you have proof, then it's easy to prove.

But what about all the times when you don't have that proof?

[–]matrixislife 2 points3 points4 points 6 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Then you don't have it, simple as that. She gets away to falsely accuse another day.

You've got to remember, proof of a crime is everything. If she falsely accuses you of rape but can't prove it, then you don't get convicted of rape. If you accuse her of false accusations but can't prove it, then she doesn't get convicted.

Also, one is not the corrolary of the other, if you can't prove a false accusation doesn't mean that she was raped, if you can't prove rape it doesn't mean she made a false accusation.

[–]Jaguar_St 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Not many seem to think that, and it shows especially with unsubstantiated/false rape accusations. It’s almost like a permanent stain on your life.

[–]matrixislife 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Oh public opinion is something completely different. I was talking about the legal state of affairs.

[–]pansimi -1 points0 points1 point 6 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

If the rape accusation proves unsubstantiated, what else is it going to be?

[–]tothecatmobile 4 points5 points6 points 6 years ago* (6 children) | Copy Link

Unsubstantiated doesn't mean it definitely didn't happen, and the person who said it did is lying.

It just means theres no proof to back it up.

Which is good, that's how the courts should work, proof is needed to prove any claim.

But no proof doesn't automatically mean that the accuser is lying, it just means there is no proof.

[–]pansimi 3 points4 points5 points 6 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

At the very least, they should make it easier to sue for damages if someone has their life ruined due to an unsubstantiated rape claim like that.

[–]tothecatmobile 4 points5 points6 points 6 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

You can already sue for defamation.

However there is still a burden of proof in civil cases.

[–]tenchineuro 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

However there is still a burden of proof in civil cases.

And I believe that state holds all the evidence and is immune from prosecution or any requirement to give testimony in a civil case.

But I do not believe that a Civil Action (which you can't afford when you've lost your livelihood) is an answer for false criminal charges.

[–]jimmyboy456 2 points3 points4 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

And if the person who made the false accusation doesn’t have any money, which is often the motive for a false rape accusation, then not a lot of point starting a civil lawsuit. A costly endeavor where if you do win the payout will never happen.

[–]tenchineuro2 points 6 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Indeed.

And happy cake day.

[–]tenchineuro 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Which is good, that's how the courts should work, proof is needed to prove any claim.

Except a claim of rape.

[–]ProbablyInadvisable 68 points69 points70 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I totally thought Alabama Bill was the equivalent of Florida Man for a second... A disturbing equivalent...

[–]_maxjacobs_ 8 points9 points10 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I literally thought the same thing. I was wondering who Alabama Bill was

[–]DanteLivra 75 points76 points77 points 6 years ago (19 children) | Copy Link

How many feminists will go on hyteria overdrive because of this ?

Finally the world is beginning to be safer for men

[–]Auntie_Hero 23 points24 points25 points 6 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

How many feminists will go on hyteria overdrive because of this ?

Cross post it in r/femaledatingstrategy and find out.

[+]tenchineuro -11 points-10 points-9 points 6 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

I'm not sure that sub is specifically feminist.

Would not r|feminism or r|askfeminists be more to the point?

[–]Auntie_Hero 23 points24 points25 points 6 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Try there too.

I'm banned from all three.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points 6 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Did you try to reason with someone or apply logic to any discussions you had?

[–]Auntie_Hero 2 points3 points4 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I answered a direct question I was asked.

Apparently, that's "mansplaining".

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Those fucking bigots! How do they know you identified as man?

[+]thegerbilofdoom3 points 6 years ago [recovered] (7 children) | Copy Link

The downside is that false accusers now have a strong incentive to not admit what they've done, so a wrongfully convicted man in this situation is fucked

[–]tenchineuro 8 points9 points10 points 6 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

The downside is that false accusers now have a strong incentive to not admit what they've done, so a wrongfully convicted man in this situation is fucked

Name one woman who recanted, just one.

Women don't recant now. This is a false flag, a non-existant problem. And the damage is done by the accusation and it is absolutely not fixed in any way by a recantation. There needs to be an incentive not to lie that you've been raped.

[+]thegerbilofdoom1 points 6 years ago [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link

Sure, here's an article

[–]tenchineuro 9 points10 points11 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

  • The alleged victim's testimony was the extent of the prosecution's case against Perry and Counts. There was no physical evidence linking them to the crime.

  • Counts contacted the Innocence Project, which began to take a new look at this case. After new FBI testing linked the DNA to a man who died in 2011, the district attorney's Conviction Integrity Program and the Office of the Appellate Defender's Reinvestigation Project in 2017 joined the new investigation.

  • Eventually, additional evidence and new interviews led the woman to admit that the rape "never happened." She recanted her testimony and said her boyfriend had pressured her to falsely accuse Perry and Counts, the district attorney's office said.

She did not recant, the innocence project had new testing done and opened a re-investigation of the conviction and when confronted with the new evidence it she admitted no rape occurred.

[–]matrixislife 7 points8 points9 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The number of false accusations that get overturned because she has admitted it are minimal anyway. They make world news because they are so rare. Overall the odds are that this will help more men in the long run, with the reduced number of false accusations made.

[–]AssholeMcMiniFridge 2 points3 points4 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I assume they'd have to prove they made a false accusation. Rather than when you lose the case you suffer consequences.

[–]DanteLivra 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Hopefully there will be less of those because as oppose to before, there are actual consequences to a false accusation.

I know a lot of manipulative women, I don't know a lot of brave one.

And when I say brave, I'm not talking about the #yasQueen type of bravery.

[–]ChestBras 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Shouldn't be an issue, since they swear that false rape accusation NEVER happen, or is, like, totes insignificant.
Surely, this, it can't affect anyone.

[+]SweatyAdvance0 points 6 years ago* [recovered] (3 children) | Copy Link

> Finally the world is beginning to be safer for men

I'm not sure that this bill will have this intended effect. What I suspect will happen is false accusers will no longer come forward and admit it, because now they will subject to a felony....

[–]tenchineuro 11 points12 points13 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

What I suspect will happen is false accusers will no longer come forward and admit it

They don't do so now.

[–]RagingHardBull 2 points3 points4 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

We should be stealing legal because making it illegal just prevents people from feeling guilty about it and returning the stolen goods.

See how stupid it sounds? Sure, those cases do happen, but they are the 0.1%. Better to focus on the 99.9% than the 0.1%. Deterring the behavior in the first place would prevent a lot more men facing penalties.

[–]DanteLivra 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If the state makes it a felony, they will stop the #believeallwomen mentality.

[–]dbgb1986 7 points8 points9 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm amazed this isn't already a law!

It should be a federal crime to falsely accuse any person of any type of sexual crime.

Considering the LIFE-LONG stigma attached to accusations, a person who is found guilty of a false allegation of a sex crime should get a mandatory minimum of 10 years in prison, with ZERO time off for good behavior. I don't care if the accusation in question has to do with a misdemeanor or felony or both.

Even if a man is found not guilty at trial, there will still be people who say, "He got off on a technicality" or "He raped her, but the prosecutor didn't do a good enough job" or "He got lucky with the jury" or "He just had a great lawyer, so he got away with it"!

In other words, even if the man was a thousand miles away from the false accuser during the alleged incident, and even if there was zero contact between them ever, their entire lives, and even if no digital or electronic or email or video or Internet was used at all, and even if the accuser is proven to be lying, and even if a jury unanimously says "THIS GUY IS 100% INNOCENT!", the public still thinks of the man as a rapist. Practically speaking, ALL someone has to do is accuse a man of rape, and boom, automatically, half the world thinks that man is a rapist.

Because of that, I also believe that a man falsely accused of rape should receive some type of compensation that takes into account his previous jobs (if applicable), pain and suffering, mental anguish, a divorce that resulted from the accusation (if applicable), loss of the ability to find a new wife or girlfriend or husband or boyfriend (if applicable), and any other damages resulting from the false accusation.

Finally, a false accuser should be legally required to REGISTER as a false accuser -- FOR THE REST OF HIS/HER LIFE. PERIOD. And all people on the false accuser registry should be barred from living or working within 100 yards of any school, any daycare, any park, any theater.

[–]CristiVasile2000 21 points22 points23 points 6 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Alabama also had finished one round of Alimony Reform that reduced the duration, size and purpose of alimony.

Now the default alimony is considered to be "rehabilitative alimony" that cannot exceed 5 year maximum and it is payed so that the spouse gets some training and gets back to workforce asap.

Also they added provisions for changes in alimony in case of health problems for the payer or changes on his/her employment or income status.

So yes, apparently they are going in the right direction, let's hope they keep going.

[–]AssholeMcMiniFridge 13 points14 points15 points 6 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Fuck. How is Alabama the most positively progressive state? Crazy. But good for them

[–]miserybusiness21 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

If you looked at your sister and thought "not bad" you probably would be willing to push for progressive, sensible lawmaking too.

[–]shit-zen-giggles 4 points5 points6 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That actually sounds remarkably reasonable and fair. Go Alabama

[–]ringrawer7 points 6 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Funny how Kavanaugh's accusers vanished off the face of the planet.

[+]WorriedSysAdmin5 points 6 years ago* [recovered] (2 children) | Copy Link

A lot keep asking how this is not a crime, it is usually only a crime if the person is actually charged. Well usually the guy/girl's wife is already destroyed by that point.

I guess I can see how some people think this will increase unreported rape/sexual assault. But I don't think the underreporting of sexual assault is due to possible legal ramifications on themselves, they are usually under control by the party that assaulted them. I think the positives of this (stopping/discouraging false accusations) is much higher.

[–]tenchineuro 7 points8 points9 points 6 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

Well usually the guy/girl's wife is already destroyed by that point.

I assume you meant life instead of wife.

But even then you have 'girl's life is already destroyed', can you name one woman who has had her life destroyed because of a false rape accusation? Just one.

[–]Mode1961 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

No, it wouldn't, to my knowledge, there has never been any proof that charging someone for false accusations will stop someone from coming forward, you know what stops women from coming forward way more than this ever wood, making false or misleading statements about the conviction rates for sexual assault/rape. Yet feminists still do it, by making statements like "only 6% of rapists are ever convicted and sentenced to jail". I mean if feminists wanted women to actually come forward they would mislead in the other directions with statements like "ALL rapists are convicted, please come forward".

[–]Goatanius 23 points24 points25 points 6 years ago (16 children) | Copy Link

If the feminists say rape should be death penalty, then false rape accusations should be life in prison

[–]KnotHanSolo 25 points26 points27 points 6 years ago (15 children) | Copy Link

The punishment for falsely accusing someone of the crime should be equal to the punishment for the crime itself. And when malice is shown it should be worse. There needs to be definitive disincentive to false accusations and we need more prosecutors to prosecute false accusations.

[–]Goatanius 5 points6 points7 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Agreed.

[–]mr-logician 3 points4 points5 points 6 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link

Then how would we be sure that the accusation was false?

[–]NohoTwoPointOh 17 points18 points19 points 6 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link

DNA, cameras, emails...you know, good old-fashioned evidence.

[–]tenchineuro 8 points9 points10 points 6 years ago* (10 children) | Copy Link

DNA, cameras, emails...you know, good old-fashioned evidence.

Proving a negative is a much more difficult thing to do. And the problem with a negative assertion is that there is normally a lack of evidence. There may be evidence for what you actually do, but not doing something leaves no supporting evidence.

But there are some forms of evidence even here, like if you have a solid alibi, you were in England when she said you raped her in Syracuse NY. But even this is a problem, if you spent the night at home alone with your wife, she can't give testimony for your location. She can't be a witness on your behalf, but she can be a witness against you.

[–]NohoTwoPointOh 4 points5 points6 points 6 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

You aren’t proving a negative. You are proving a malicious fabrication. This is different than a defense against a rape accusation.

[–]tenchineuro 8 points9 points10 points 6 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

You aren’t proving a negative. You are proving a malicious fabrication.

Part of which requires showing that no rape occurred.

[–]NohoTwoPointOh 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Though there can often be overlap (or work in parallel) those are two distinct endeavors.

Defending against the accusation is proving the negative. No, This person did not rape. There is no evidence to prove the rape (or evidence exists that that person is not the rapist). There can be a disproven accusation without malicious intent.

Charging someone with a malicious accusation is proving a positive. Yes, this person indeed fabricated a claim and here is the evidence to prove the existence of the fabrication.

[–]RagingHardBull 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Yes, that is not hard. Someone says they were raped at XYZ time, but the walmart CCTV says they were at walmart shopping with their girlfriend at the time. Later, investigation into texts among friends indicate this woman sought "revenge" against the accused male for something other than rape.

[–]tenchineuro 2 points3 points4 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yes, that is not hard. Someone says they were raped at XYZ time, but the walmart CCTV says they were at walmart shopping with their girlfriend at the time. Later, investigation into texts among friends indicate this woman sought "revenge" against the accused male for something other than rape.

The police don't normally investigate the accuser, although police in the UK have now been pretty much forced to read the accuser's text messages.

But I get your point.

[–]MidNerd 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Only you aren't proving a negative. Proving someone falsely filed an accusation is proving a positive. You're falling for the feminist talking point that someone getting acquited for rape means that the accuser will get tried for a false accusation. That's not the goal or how the process works.

Prosecuting for a false accusation would be its own separate court battle that is not reliant on the initial accusation. If there is evidence that an accusation was false, then the filing party should face consequences per that evidence. If someone is dumb enough to text their friends that they enjoyed the sex and then turn around and say the person raped them that proves that the accusation was false. The initial accusation never comes into play or matters beyond the fact that it was taken by the accused.

[–]tenchineuro 2 points3 points4 points 6 years ago* (3 children) | Copy Link

Only you aren't proving a negative. Proving someone falsely filed an accusation is proving a positive.

No, it's not. You have to prove two things.

  1. That she was NOT raped (a negative)
  2. Malice

You're falling for the feminist talking point that someone getting acquited for rape means that the accuser will get tried for a false accusation.

No, I am not.

That's not the goal or how the process works.

The goal of our current legal system seems to be to put as many men in prison as possible and as few women as possible. And the process is geared to work for the woman.

Prosecuting for a false accusation would be its own separate court battle that is not reliant on the initial accusation.

It is reliant on the initial accusation, that's what the trial would be about. As you say, it would be a separate trial.

If there is evidence that an accusation was false, then the filing party should face consequences per that evidence.

Should, but it almost never happens even with the trivial penalties she might receive.

If someone is dumb enough to text their friends that they enjoyed the sex and then turn around and say the person raped them that proves that the accusation was false.

That's exactly what happened in the Liam Allen case in the UK (and many others). They appointed a new head of the CPS (Alison Saunders) who swore she would get the rape conviction rate up. She did this by putting innocent men on trial and in jail, the police would hide exculpatory evidence from the defense.

  • Met Police apologise for Liam Allan rape case errors

  • https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-42873618

The woman who falsely accused him is still anonymous and has not been charged with anything.

This is also the case in a seeming majority of on-campus rape accusations, but the campus kangaroo courts are not there to be fair and reasonable, they are there to #believethewoman.

So I think you are overstating the importance of exculpatory evidence.

[–]MidNerd 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

First: There's a reason why I use the word would in my comment. I am well aware that this isn't how the system works now but rather how the system should work.

No, it's not. You have to prove two things. *That she was NOT raped (a negative) *Malice

You should not need to prove that she was not raped in order to prosecute for a false rape accusation. That's not what you're prosecuting for, and, despite how it sounds, has no bearing on if she filed a false report. Technically, this could lead to situations where both individuals go to prison, but in actuality if there is proof beyond a reasonable doubt that the report was false that also means there is no hard evidence that the rape happened. Neither case has any bearing on the other as both should require impeccable evidence for a conviction that would prevent both being true.

Essentially, these are dueling problems where only one can be true in a single instance (with the possibility of both being true in multiple instances), but proving either one disproves the other. If you can prove beyond a reasonable doubt that someone was raped, then they were raped and the accusation was not false. If you can prove beyond a reasonable doubt that someone lied about being raped, then they are the perpetrator and the accused is the victim. Proving that someone lied about an accusation does not require proving that the action never occurred. It just requires proving that they lied.

As a more obvious example using an actual case, let's say Abe got a big tip from delivering pizzas, but Abe didn't want to report it for whatever reason so Abe lies to his manager and says he got mugged while getting gas. Since it happened on the job, Abe's manager requires him to file a police report and Abe doesn't think anything of it. Abe then goes and texts his coworker about the situation and that coworker gets interviewed by a detective the next day and shows the detective the texts. The detective then charges Abe with filing a false police report, because the detective/prosecutor didn't have to prove that the mugging didn't happen. They only had to prove that Abe lied, of which he admitted himself in a recordable format. No amount of proving a negative required. Somehow, the police/courts have been hoodwinked into believing that doesn't apply to women in sexual assault cases despite being the case for every other type of case.

[–]tenchineuro 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

You should not need to prove that she was not raped in order to prosecute for a false rape accusation.

You and I seem to be understand the meaning of 'false' differently.

If you can prove beyond a reasonable doubt that someone was raped, then they were raped and the accusation was not false.

But you don't have to prove anything in a rape trial, the woman's unsupported word is sufficient for a trial and conviction.

And there are a lot of innocent men released from prison (for crimes up to and including murder) who might disagree with you.

Abe then goes and texts his coworker about the situation and that coworker gets interviewed by a detective the next day and shows the detective the texts.

Long chains of texts from several (still anonymous) women in the UK making rape accusations certainly did not help Liam Allen or others, the CPS was still going to prosecute. In fact, the CPS deliberately hid exculpatory evidence from the defense lawyers. So I see what you are saying, but it does not seem to work that way in rape cases.

Somehow, the police/courts have been hoodwinked into believing that doesn't apply to women in sexual assault cases despite being the case for every other type of case.

And rape is the only felony where the defense is limited.

[–]Jaguar_St 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You know, I think u/MidNerd was explaining how false rape accusations should be prosecuted, and you seem to be on the same boat. What exactly do you take issue with? And can you please elaborate on your first point?

[–][deleted] 13 points14 points15 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

good old-fashioned evidence.

Unlike what is needed to arrest a man under a rape accusation. The accusation counts as evidence, apparently. Which is bullshit.

[–]Koalachan 3 points4 points5 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Certain groups keep saying that false allegations are a myth, or that they are extremely rare. For lawmakers to be trying to make this a law, it must be happening enough to be a problem.

[–]RyansPutter 4 points5 points6 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This article is from a year ago. What happened?

[–]Ragnrok 11 points12 points13 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

False rape accusations are already prosecutable everywhere in America. The issue isn't making laws against it, the issue is actually prosecuting the perpetrators.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

False rape accusations are already prosecutable everywhere in America

From what I've read in this thread and elsewhere, only under the crime of 'making a false report', which would have the same punishment as making a false report regarding theft or other crime.

This is making the act of 'making a false rape accusation' a crime specifically.

[–]imcream 2 points3 points4 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

wait isn't that already criminal everywhere?

[–]FindingKeeping 2 points3 points4 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

A year old news whats the status Dickie Drake?

[–]RacelessSexlessName 2 points3 points4 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

(Introduced - Dead)

It's sitting on a judiciary committee... so likely dead as listed.

[–]jeff_the_nurse 2 points3 points4 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I e-mailed all of the reps asking them to support the bill and why they should. Here’s one response:

Good Morning,

I just wanted to take a moment and say thank you for the email. Unfortunately, the 2020 legislative session has been cut short due to COVID 19. We will be going in on May 4th and only taking up the budgets and local bills. Constitutionally, our session must end by May 18th. These may be some issues that we can address in the 2021 session.

Thanks again and I look forward to your correspondence in the future.

If anything, we monitor this next year. Do not forget, my fellow MRAs.

[–]marks1995 6 points7 points8 points 6 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link

I understand the support from men on this. Believe, this is one of my biggest efars as my son is about to start college.

But these are tough. I have a daughter too and I would never want her to be afraid to come forward about being raped.

The other problem I have is that many women lately have been recanting after more and more comes out. If recanting is going to get them charged, I think they take their lie to the grave.

This is a really tough issue.

[–]Flowman 8 points9 points10 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Usually laws like this are written in such a way that to be prosecuted, the false accusation has to be not just proven to be false, but the person who made said accusation has to have willingly and knowingly be proven to have been lying the entire time.

That's a really tough burden to beat.

[–]tenchineuro 10 points11 points12 points 6 years ago* (12 children) | Copy Link

But these are tough. I have a daughter too and I would never want her to be afraid to come forward about being raped.

High school girls today are accusing boys they don't like of rape, women yell rape falsely for scads of reasons. But you just worry about only your daughter, it's the feminist thing to do.

This is a really tough issue.

It's a tough issue only if you believe the feminist idiocy that if women were penalized for ruining the lives of innocent men that they would be less likely to make rape accusations. It's a tough issue only if you're kinda iffy on the idea of justice for men (including apparently your son). It's a tough issue only if you're not sure that the guilty party should be punished, if she's female.

[–]marks1995 2 points3 points4 points 6 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

So you don't believe rape happens? Is that really your argument? You believe false accusations outnumber real rapes?

And I am no feminist.

Your second comment just makes no sense, so I won't respond to that one.

[–]tenchineuro 6 points7 points8 points 6 years ago* (5 children) | Copy Link

So you don't believe rape happens?

  • High School Girls Admitted to Making False Sexual Assault Accusations Against a Male Student Because They 'Just Don't Like Him'

  • https://reason.com/2018/10/17/seneca-valley-mean-girls-false-sexual/

So not liking someone apparently makes them a rapist.

  • Laura Hood: Woman ‘wished she knew’ why she falsely accused taxi driver of rape, court hears

  • https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/laura-hood-taxi-driver-rape-false-accusation-haroon-yousaf-a8969426.html

Not happy with your cab ride for some reason, you've been raped.

  • Liam Allan: Met Police apologise to 22-year-old man falsely accused of rape after failing to disclose crucial text messages

  • https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/liam-allan-met-police-rape-accusation-false-evidence-disclosure-arrest-mistake-detectives-a8184916.html

It's been awhile. But I think he broke up with her and she was not happy with that, so it's rape.

  • Woman falsely accused police of rape, assault, prosecutors say

  • https://www.springfieldnewssun.com/news/national/woman-falsely-accused-police-rape-assault-prosecutors-say/rxYO5JKa0rHdVQYS2FkFDL/

Think the police should not have arrested you, that's rape.

  • Gay man's 'living hell' after being falsely accused of rape by former University of Worcester student

  • https://www.worcesternews.co.uk/news/16117528.gay-mans-living-hell-after-being-falsely-accused-of-rape-by-former-university-of-worcester-student/

Become infatuated with a man who ignores you (cause he's gay), that's rape too.

  • Fantasist, 27, jailed for 10 years for falsely accusing 15 men of rape and sexual assault loses appeal against conviction

  • https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/8741509/fantasist-jailed-falsely-accusing-men-rape-appeal/

This woman made a business model out of making false rape accusations, the UK pays victim compensation. She had put 4 men in prison and done devastating damage to 15 innocent men's lives. I think the only reason the UK did anything was because they have financial problems.

The problem today is that it seems pretty much anything and everything is rape.

You believe false accusations outnumber real rapes?

I know that they are not illegal as such and they are not counted, so there really are no valid numbers. Numbers are irrelevant in each and every case though, this is feminist messaging that means forget men falsely accused, they don't matter, the only problem is the rape of women.

And I am no feminist.

I'm not convinced. Perhaps if you stopped using feminist arguments?

You really don't seem to support justice or equal protection under the law for men falsely accused. Same as the feminist movement, just ask Mary Koss who advised the US government that men can't be raped, she called it 'unwanted sex'.

[–]Bammer1386 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

You didnt answer his question, and hes not automatically a feminist for taking an approach of advocating discussion by weighing both sides of the coin. You shut his discussion down the same way a radical feminist does.

Also, 6 or 7 anecdotes from the internet are not enough evidence to say that all women these days are crying rape over the slightest bullshit. Does it happen? Fuck yeah. Is it as common as you make it out to be? Think of every private interaction between young men and women in the Western world. A billion per day? You found 6 interactions that went tits up. Even if you found 1 million instances, youd be shooting 1%.

Like I said, it happens, but its not as common as youre saying.

[–]tenchineuro 5 points6 points7 points 6 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

You didnt answer his question, and hes not automatically a feminist for taking an approach of advocating discussion by weighing both sides of the coin.

There is no coin, there is only justice on an individual level. And regardless of the numbers of rapes and false rape accusations, both are just as wrong as they were before no matter what the number and the victims of both deserve fair and equal treatment. But as long as we label the accuser the victim, we have no claim to trying to be fair and protecting the innocent party.

You shut his discussion down the same way a radical feminist does.

With data? What are you smoking?

Also, 6 or 7 anecdotes from the internet are not enough evidence to say that all women these days are crying rape over the slightest bullshit.

It proves that women are crying rape over the slightest bullshit, apparently you missed that.

And these are not anecdotes, they are documented court cases.

Does it happen? Fuck yeah. Is it as common as you make it out to be?

I already said that numbers don't matter. But consider that not all men falsely accused are that lucky, many end up in jail and are counted as rapists. The numbers are as cooked as rape trials, what matters (and I believe we disagree) is right and wrong.

Like I said, it happens, but its not as common as youre saying.

What did I say that you're refuting?

[+]marks1995 -6 points-5 points-4 points 6 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I've seen most of those and in almost all of them, the woman finally admitted she lied. That is the only point I am making. If they were facing years in jail, do you really think they admit it? Or do they double down and even if nobody ends up going to jail, the guy is still going to be carrying that around with no public resolution.

You know only about 7% of women actually identify as feminist? It's because feminists take a hard stance and refuse to see any middle ground. You're doing the same thing to MRA.

All I said was I could see an issue with this law. Didn't say I supported it and I didn't say I was against it. And you jump my shit.

[–]tenchineuro 4 points5 points6 points 6 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

I've seen most of those and in almost all of them, the woman finally admitted she lied.

In the UK the wording is 'the cases collapsed' meaning that in light of the text messages the case was unwinnable. And we have no idea who these women were so tell me where you get the information that they admitted that they lied.

That is the only point I am making.

Document it then, your guesses don't buy anything here.

Find some documentation that they admitted they lied (before being talked to or arrested by the police).

If they were facing years in jail, do you really think they admit it?

Prove that any of them did, then we can discuss it.

You know only about 7% of women actually identify as feminist? It's because feminists take a hard stance and refuse to see any middle ground.

They don't want to be associated with the vast negativity and hate of the feminist movement, but if you try and find anything feminism has said or done that they actually disagree with, you will fail repeatedly. So they don't use the label, most of them walk like a feminist, talk like a feminist and quack like a feminist.

You're doing the same thing to MRA.

If you're allergic to data and reality, you are not an MRA. And this is also a feminist argument.

All I said was I could see an issue with this law.

Yes, the exact same false flag that feminists have been throwing up for at least 30 years.

Didn't say I supported it and I didn't say I was against it. And you jump my shit.

I'm responding to you making feminist arguments. You made several this post.

[–]marks1995 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Prove that any of them did, then we can discuss it.

From the article you posted...

"By the end of the summer, the conspiracy against T.F. was unmasked: other students came forward with Snapchat messages that contradicted the claims of the "mean girls," who eventually admitted to lying. All charges against T.F. were dropped."

"Ms Hood has admitted the incident could not have taken place but has denied that she knowingly lied about it."

I'm not going through each one, but the first two you posted says they admitted to it. Whether or not that was after being questioned is irrelevant. You think people that are questioned always come clean? They could have stuck to their story. And while the case probably would have fallen apart and no conviction, the accused would still have that always hanging out there. when they admit they lied, there is some vindication for the accused.

As to the rest of your comments, I guess you believe you are either an MRA or a feminists and nothing in between? If I don't 100% support your ideals, I must be a feminist.

Look through my post history and you will see exactly what I think about feminism....

[–]RagingHardBull -4 points-3 points-2 points 6 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

So you don't believe rape happens?

No woman who legitimately was raped would be fearful. Only a false accuser who knew there was evidence of their false accusation would be fearful.

[–]marks1995 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

BS. Women who were raped are always fearful about pressing charges.

[–]RagingHardBull 3 points4 points5 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I don't think fear that someone will discover evidence that demonstrates they are making false rape charges is a legit fear women have about filing rape charges, so nothing changes for them.

I also don't think there is strong evidence that women are fearful of filing rape charges. If they were so fearful, then why would so many women file false rape charges?

[–]marks1995 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Women filing false charges aren't afraid of it because they haven't been through the actual trauma of it.

Women that have been raped have been traumatized, and there is often a fear that they will have to relive it in front of a lot of people and not be believed.

[–]Bisexual-Bop-It -1 points0 points1 point 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I dont think you know how many people have experienced sexual assault and rape. A majority of the women I know have been, and none of my guy friends open up to me about it, but I wouldnt be surprised if they have been groped or forced at some point.

I have been sexually assaulted and it was completely in public, in a park, and they did it so casually that it took me a solid week and a half to realise why it felt so wrong. Am I going to try to remeber this one day of my life back in middle school and try to prove it infront of a court or law? Theres no way I could, despite it definitely, 100% happening.

[–]ZCommander9088 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Good step one. Step two is to give the same jail time as actual rape bc it is just as damaging if not more just in different ways.

[–]kingjohn1919 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

In Ontario, Canada, people are actually encouraged to make whatever allegations, an NOTHING is done for false, or worse, repeated false allegations...they will not punish anyone who reports to police...there is law against it, but never enforced

[–]SporkTornado 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Aren't false accusations already considered a form of perjury?

[–]McFeely_Smackup 4 points5 points6 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If the accused is found not guilty, the accuser would be responsible for paying the accused person’s legal expenses.

that's not even close to true, and sets the tone for an obviously biased article. Subtly "misunderstanding" a law and writing an article about how outrageous it is, is the very definition of bad journalism.

[–]Schiller_Memestar 2 points3 points4 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Let's hope the rest of America follows

[–]asdf333aza 3 points4 points5 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Should of been that way from the start. Give them thr same punishment the man was looking at. We need a judge to make an example out of one of these liars.

[–]mr-logician 3 points4 points5 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Excerpt from the article

It’s an effort to silence men and women who are coming forward about sexual assault. It’s an effort to make them afraid to come forward.

It’s good that even the people against this bill know that both genders can be victims.

[–]RagingHardBull 5 points6 points7 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

They only "know" that when they are trying to gather support for a bill that benefits men.

[–]BurningOrangeHeaven 2 points3 points4 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I doubt there are many cases where it will be proven and this kind of law is just going to make the women change tactics and be more careful with how they frame some of these guys.

Also going to be the inevitable case where a girl really did get raped but then gets taken to court like this.

Idk how to make it better.

[+]DoctorMoneyStacks2 points 6 years ago [recovered] (8 children) | Copy Link

If you read the article they mention that not bieng convicted will mean the accuser will pay your legal fees. This would be a bad law, because sex crimes are notoriously hard to convict, but that does not mean the accuser is lying, yet with this bill that would be the new assumption, thus penalizing real victims. This is not the solution we need to the current issue. We need a solution with nuance.

[–]carlsberg24 15 points16 points17 points 6 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

The article is incorrect in stating that. The bill says:

(a) A person commits the crime of making a false sexual allegation if: ... (2) He or she willfully, knowingly, and with malicious intent, makes a false report ... and whose allegations are proven to be false.

... b) A person making a false sexual allegation may be 10 liable to the person accused for all costs associated with his 11 or her legal defense.

The latter point (b) ) is a subsection of ((a)) so b) applies ONLY if a person was proven to have made a false allegation, not just in the event of a lack of conviction of the accused.

[–]shit-zen-giggles 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Thanks for posting the actual text of the law and explaining it.

[–]Auntie_Hero 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

(b) is not a subsection of (a), it follows (a) in the same subsection. If it were a subsection of (a), it would be a number.

[–]carlsberg24 10 points11 points12 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Yeah, it does look like it on closer inspection, but it still refers to a false allegation, which is defined as having been proven rather than the accused just being found not guilty.

[–]Auntie_Hero 3 points4 points5 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Right, all the criteria for studies on fake accusations require positive proof of the lie, not just unfounded or unproven.

Eugene Kanin did a study showing up to 60% of accusations are false. Naturally this varies from place to place, but he held the same requirements, that the woman had to recant or they had to produce proof that she knowingly and willingly lied in court.

[–]FIREOFDOOM2000 5 points6 points7 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Id assume the case of lying would be a whole separate case where the prosecution has to PROVE that the defendant is guilty of lying about said case. That means that beyond reasonable doubt, you would have to show that the defendant premeditated a false rape accusation. It wouldn’t be a he said she said situation. I have a feeling that this law won’t do much because in order to prove without a doubt, that’s going to take a hell of a lot of evidence and a solid case. Which lets be real is going to be hard

[–]tenchineuro 3 points4 points5 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Id assume the case of lying would be a whole separate case where the prosecution has to PROVE that the defendant is guilty of lying about said case.

It would be nice if that applied to a charge of rape, but the unsupported word of a woman is sufficient to raise a jury issue and a conviction. And rape shield laws literally make the judge an advocate for the accused.

So we have vastly dissimilar standards of proof.

[+]1478963259874563213 points 6 years ago* [recovered] (4 children) | Copy Link

I feel this bill would need to specificlly state what is a false allegation. if it could be proven a false allegation then yes criminalize it. However i feel like Alabama would simply label all alegations as false claims discouraging any women from speaking up. i need to see the bill.

[–]genkernels 2 points3 points4 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It is criminal, the default is beyond reasonable doubt.

[+]Justathrowawayoh1 points 6 years ago* [recovered] (2 children) | Copy Link

first step would be to read the article which links the bill

[+]1478963259874563211 points 6 years ago* [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link

i read it, they want to have all the costs of a not guilty verdict put on the person making the accusations. So even if it is most likely the woman was raped, but not 100% provable in court, the woman making the accusations would be charged all the costs of the court. Seems like Alabama is still Alabama.

[–]TheMasterSword60 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

“It’s not solving a new problem,” Connolly said. “It is a problem if someone makes a false report, and that’s rare.

Hah, rare my ass!

[–]SharedRegime 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Filing false police reports is illegal in the US atleast yes the issue is it has to be proven to be false and the vast majority of cases of rape are just ended right at "no evidence" instead of "no evidence but this person might be lying so investigate them."

If this law does not in turn make a law that requires LE to investigate no evidence cases for falsehood then its pointless.

[+]SweatySpecialist1 points 6 years ago [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link

I’d say the odds of this passing are not very high. Cue the women’s rights and domestic violence groups that will trample every politician in support of this bill.

[–]AssholeMcMiniFridge 4 points5 points6 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Its Alabama. I'd say odds aren't great, but a little better than 50/50. Maybe 65/35 in favor, its very reasonable over all, and they can publicly decry anyone fighting it for that.

[–]therealnumberone 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

This is good but it needs to be worded carefully so that it only punishes those whose allegations are proven false, not those that are not proven true. There’s a big difference and the latter is very bad.

[–]McFeely_Smackup 6 points7 points8 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

ok, but by definition ANY law only punishes people who are "proven" guilty.

[–]tenchineuro 4 points5 points6 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

ok, but by definition ANY law only punishes people who are "proven" guilty.

Not so, the man is in jail awaiting trial with the word 'rapist' all over the papers. His job and career are over right there. He has to pay for his own defense while the state pays everything for the woman and keeps her anonymous.

The accusation alone can be a life destroyer, even if it does not go to trial.

[–]tenchineuro 5 points6 points7 points 6 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

This is good but it needs to be worded carefully so that it only punishes those whose allegations are proven false, not those that are not proven true. There’s a big difference and the latter is very bad.

I disagree, the standard of proof should be exactly the same as that for rape. Everybody should be equal before the law.

[–]therealnumberone -1 points0 points1 point 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

No. Yes the standards for being found guilty of rape need to be changed, but there must be definitive proof otherwise nobody will come forward for legitimate cases of rape.

[–]tenchineuro 6 points7 points8 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

No. Yes the standards for being found guilty of rape need to be changed, but there must be definitive proof otherwise nobody will come forward for legitimate cases of rape.

If that's the standard for false rape accusations it needs to be the standard for rape accusations. The Constitution guarantees equal protection under the law...

  • "nor shall any State [...] deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws".

[–]DTopping80 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Damn domestic crimes about to see a spike!

[–]FancyRough 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Only if bill would pass.

[–]Chowmeen_Boi 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I kinda want to go into politics when I'm older to pass laws like this but choosing a political party is a real pain in the ass

[+][deleted] 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]Chowmeen_Boi 2 points3 points4 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The Democrats wont do anything if your not a minority and the Republicans are pretty dumb but agreeable on a lot of topics

[–]banana_bazooka 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It’s a shame that they aren’t already a crime when they are so relevant and often

[–]ChaosOpen 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's not "under-reported" they just expect those evil men to be raping a lot more and when the numbers aren't there they assume they simply aren't being reported.

[–]callmeDannyDanielz 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

FUCK YEAHHHHHHHH

[–]DiscipleOfTheMist 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Feminist, they are on to you! 🤣

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

Alabama being ahead of the curve for once? I guess this timeline has something going for it.

Edit:

After reading through the whole article again

If the accused is found not guilty, the accuser would be responsible for paying the accused person’s legal expenses.

I think we'd need to be careful here and differentiate the difference between someone accusing someone of rape and the accused being found not guilty and someone clearly making a false rape allegation. There is a clear difference and should be noted in the law to reflect this.

[–]IAmTotallyAJohnSmith[S] 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I literally had one person message me to lick a "Manhattan doorknob" and another say I am cucked because I post in r/MensRights lmao

[–]AkashUK 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Maybe Alabama isn't such a bad state after all.

[–]MeinChutiya69 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You go, Alabama

[–]Kadmos1 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I am of the mind that any false claim, but especially false rape claims, should carry an absolute min. prison sentence of 3.5 years. By this, I mean that the lying claimant is to serve no less than that long (they serve the entire sentence unless they die in prison).

[–]gaymergaylord 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

idk I feel like this a bit risky. it's definately good but the fact it's happening in alabama worries me. u can't just ignore all the ACTUAL cases of rape against both genders that ppl. this sub mentions men being raped and nothing happening... what happens to those real victims if they lose in court?

[–]THE_U_P_ 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Proving that a sexual crime took place is difficult. Per this difficulty, we're curious as to how the state will prove that an allegation is false.

[–]WhyNotDanceWithAHen 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I’m from Alabama and I’m glad Alabama is committing a change for sure, can’t wait.

[–]LimitlessMind127 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Has this gone through?

[–]LifeAboutNothing 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

How many years could someone get for this crime. Is what I want to know.

[–]Ody_ssey 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

Suspended sentence by court most of the time.

[–]derpatron13 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

SWEET HOME ALABAMA

[–]lProtheanl 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Wait it’s not already?? Is this reall??

[–]academicRedditor 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

About time

[–]novdelta307 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Holy shit Alabama doing something right in their legal system?

[–]darthmemeios14 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Perhaps I treated you too harshly

[–]chambertlo 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This should be a federal crime.

[–]Creekmour 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Now we can have a #BelieveMen campaign.

[–]FauzanZaenuri 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Sweet home alabama

[–]EffectivePineapple2 -1 points0 points1 point 6 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

My only problem is that someone should have to prove they intentionally lied. This bill seems too generic.

[–]AssholeMcMiniFridge 6 points7 points8 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Its part of it already. The article purposely misinterprets that, trying to make it seem like if an accuser loses in court, they're automatically punished and are required to pay the accused fir the expenses.

[–]Drayelya 4 points5 points6 points 6 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Burden of proof is on the accuser not the accused. Hopefully this will prompt more thorough investigations to ensure shit is right before it ever hits court.

[–]tenchineuro 6 points7 points8 points 6 years ago* (5 children) | Copy Link

Burden of proof is on the accuser not the accused.

Not so, neither the accused or accuser is a party to the trial, the burden of proof is on the DA. and in a rape accusation no evidence of any kind is needed, a woman's unsupported word is sufficient for a jury trial and a conviction.

[–]Drayelya 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Either way some kind of evidence is required. It’s no secret DAs withhold or fabricate pertinent information in many cases. Who watches the watchers?

[–]tenchineuro 2 points3 points4 points 6 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Either way some kind of evidence is required.

No, it is not.

  • https://casetext.com/case/taylor-v-state-1883

  • (14) Taylor's argument that the Court accepted a guilty verdict against the weight of the evidence has been ruled on by the Mississippi Supreme Court in numerous cases. The defense claims that the State's evidence, based primarily on the word of a victim who is a young child, is not sufficient for conviction. This State's supreme court has always held that the unsupported word of the victim of a sex crime is sufficient for conviction, unless it is substantially contradicted by other credible testimony or physical facts. The court in Christian v. State, 456 So.2d 729 (Miss. 1984), affirmed a conviction where there was no evidence of external injury and only the word of the prosecutrix to prove guilt. In Otis v. State, 418 So.2d 65 (Miss. 1982), the victim was a fifteen year old mentally impaired girl who did not report the rape for five weeks. There was no physical evidence, and the court found that her word was sufficient.

[–]Drayelya -1 points0 points1 point 6 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

Mississippi is not the entirety of the world/US or its court cases. So my point still stands.

EDIT: There are a plethora of blogs, articles and God only knows what else arguing against rape cases being subject to “beyond a reasonable doubt” as many charges are dropped because of a lack of sufficient evidence and feminism, as we all know, can’t stand that fact.

[–]tenchineuro 3 points4 points5 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

There's lots more. I'm not going to waste any more time here, you will believe what you wish anyway.

Note: There are too many citations and they don't copy/paste correctly, follow the link to see the rest.

http://www.ncdsv.org/images/VUSL_LegacyOfThePromptComplaintRequirementCorroborationRequirementAndCautionaryInstructionsOnCampusSA_2004.pdf

142 Montgomery v. State, 556 S.W.2d 559, 560 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1977) (“The rape statute . . . does not require that the testimony of the violated female be corroborated.”).

143 State v. Archuleta, 747 P.2d 1019, 1021 (Utah 1987) (declining to adopt position that testimony of rape victim alone cannot support a conviction).

144 Moore v. Com., 491 S.E.2d 739 (Va. 1997) (stating that conviction of rape may be sustained solely upon victim’s testimony).

145 Alaska, Arizona, Hawaii, Kansas, Kentucky, Massachusetts, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Oklahoma, West Virginia, Wisconsin. See citations in next notes.

146See Henry v. State, 861 P.2d 582 (Alaska Ct. App. 1993) (when victim of sexual abuse recants allegation, state must show corroborating evidence to support prior allegations); Brower v. State, 728 P.2d 645 (Alaska Ct. App. 1986) (conviction can only be based on complaining witness’ prior inconsistent statements only if corroborating evidence existed).In Massachusetts, corroborative evidence is required to support a prior inconsistent statement. SeeCommonwealth v. Sineiro, 740 N.E.2d 602 (Mass. 2000) (corroborative evidence required when there is “prior inconsistent Grand Jury testimony that contains an essential element of the crime”).

147 State v. Williams, 526 P.2d 714 (Ariz. 1974) (conviction may be had on basis of uncorroborated testimony of prosecutrix unless story is physically impossible or so incredible that no reasonable person could believe it).

148 Remine v. State, 759 P.2d 230, 232 (Okla. Crim. App. 1988) (corroboration of the victim’s testimony is “only necessary when [the] prosecutrix’s testimony is too inherently improbable to support a conviction”). State v. McPherson, 371 S.E.2d 333, 337 (W. Va. 1988) (allowing sex offense convictions to rest solely on the uncorroborated testimony of the victim, unless the testimony is “inherently incredible”). West Virginia also allows the court to give a cautionary instruction when testimony is uncorroborated. See State v. McPherson, 371 S.E.2d 333, 337 (W. Va. 1988).

149 State v. Borthwick, 880 P.2d 1261 (Kan. 1994) (testimony of prosecutrix alone could be sufficient to sustain rape conviction without further corroboration as long as it is clear and convincing); State v. Mitchell, 771 P.2d 73 (Kan. 1989) (when uncorroborated testimony of prosecutrix is unbelievable, testimony alone is insufficient to sustain rape conviction); State v. Matlock, 660 P.2d 945 (Kan. 1983) (conviction of rape can be upheld without corroboration as long as there is clear and convincing evidence and as long as testimony is not so incredible and improbable as to defy belief); Carrier v. Commonwealth, 356 S.W.2d 752 (Ken. 1962) (stating that uncorroborated testimony of prosecutrix may be sufficient to sustain conviction if proof is clear and convincing, but insufficient if prosecutrix’s story is intrinsically improbable or her actions before and after alleged offense indicate that offense did not happen).

150 Williams v. State, 757 So.2d 953 (Miss. 1999) (stating that unsupported word of victim of sex crime is sufficient to support a guilty verdict where that testimony is not discredited or contradicted by other credible evidence).

151 State v. Gilyard, 979 S.W.2d 138 (Mo. 1998) (corroborative evidence can be highly probative of victim credibility and may even be essential, such as where victim’s testimony is unconvincing or contradictory).152 State v. Olson, 951 P.2d 571, 576-77 (Mont. 1997) (reversing previous case law insofar as cases required victim’s testimony be consistent with other evidence to support a conviction of sexual assault); (State v. Howie, 744 P.2d 156, 159 (Mont. 1987) (“Conviction of a sexual assault may be based entirely on the uncorroborated testimony of the victim.”).

153 Battle v. United States, 630 A.2d 211 (D.C. 1993) (recognizing that corroboration requirement has been abolished but that corroboration might still be necessary, not to ascertain truth of statement but to explain inconsistencies).

154 See Thomas v. State, 284 N.W.2d 917, 924 (Wis. 1979) (stating victim’s testimony was unreliable because she “stated that she did not remember the incident of sexual intercourse and only testified as to what she had been told to say”). (“[T]his court has held that ‘. . . [w]here the testimony of the prosecuting witness bears upon its face evidence of its unreliability, to sustain a conviction there should be corroboration by other evidence as to the principal facts relied on to constitute the crime.’”).

155 Cautionary instructions are regularly employed for the testimony of accomplices, individuals who are or could have been indicted for the same crime as the defendant, arising out of the same events, who testify against the defendant in return for immunity or a lesser charge against them. Christine J. Saverda, Note, Accomplices in Federal Court: A Case for Increased Evidentiary Standards, 100 YALE L.J. 785, 786 (1990). Unlike rape victims, accomplices as a routine matter may have self-interested motives for lying or exaggerating on the witness stand. In Hawaii, the cautionary instruction for accomplice testimony reads:

  • The testimony of an alleged accomplice should be examined and weighed by you with greater care and caution than the testimony of ordinary witnesses. You should decide whether the witness’s testimony has been affected by the witness’s interest in the outcome of the case, or by prejudice against the defendant, or by the benefits that the witness stands to receive because of his/her testimony, or by the witness’s fear of retaliation from the government.

Hawaii Criminal Jury Instructions 6.01(A). In Oklahoma, the accomplice cautionary instruction states: “No person may be convicted on the testimony of an accomplice unless the testimony of such a witness is corroborated by other evidence.” Vernon’s Okla. Forms 2d, OUJI-CR 9-25. See also Colo. Jury Instr.. Criminal 4:06, CO-JICRIM 4:06; 10 Minn. Prac. Jury Instr. Guides –Criminal CRIMJIG 3.18 (4th ed.).Cautionary instructions have sometimes been issued with child and alibi witnesses. See, e.g.,Carol J. Miller, Annotation, Instructions to Jury as to Credibility of Child’s Testimony in Criminal Case, 32 A.L.R.4th 1 196 (2003); Frank D. Wagner, Annotation, Propriety and Prejudicial Effect of Instructions on Credibility of Alibi Witnesses, 72 A.L.R.3d 617 (2003).

156COLO. REV. STAT. ANN. § 18-3-408 (West 2002) (“In any criminal prosecution [for a sexual offense], or for attempt or conspiracy to commit any [sexual offense crime], the jury shall not be instructed to examine with caution the testimony of the victim solely because of the nature of the charge, nor shall the jury be instructed that such a charge is easy to make but difficult to defend against, nor shall any similar instruction be given.”); IOWA CODE ANN. § 709.6 West 2002 (stating that no instruction is permitted that tells jury to use different standard for victim’s testimony than that of another witness to that offense or another offense); MD. CRIM. LAW § 3-320 (West 2002) (prohibiting jury instruction telling jury to examine victim’s testimony with caution solely because of nature of charge); MINN. STAT. ANN. § 609.347 (5)(d)(West 2002) amended by 2002 MINN. SESS. LAW. SERV. CH. 381 (S.B. 2433) (West) (prohibiting instruction for jury to scrutinize victim’s testimony more closely than in other prosecutions); NEV. REV. STAT. ANN. § 175.186(2) (Michie 2002) (prohibiting instruction that states that rape is difficult to prove or establish beyond a reasonable doubt); 18PA. CONS. STAT. ANN. § 3106 (West) (“The credibility of a complainant of an offense under this chapter shall be determined by the same standard as is the credibility of a complainant of any other crime. The testimony of a complainant need not be corroborated in prosecutions [for sexual offenses]. No instructions shall be given cautioning the jury to view the complainant’s testimony in any other way than that in which all complainants’ testimony is viewed.”); S.D.

[–]Drayelya 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Of course there are lots more but, it isn’t all of them. Thank you for the links. Civil discourse is not time wasted.

[–]happymeal2 -1 points0 points1 point 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I’m for this, but my only hope is we don’t see people trying to get everyone whose original rape case didn’t bring a guilty verdict then charged with false rape charges. I’m sure they get screened before they end up in a courtroom like any other case but I’d hate to see a woman who did have it happen to her but couldn’t prove it, then thrown into this situation.

Also I’m a guy who’s had someone falsely accuse me of DV so I’m not some white knight by any means.

[–]Mcstalker01 -1 points0 points1 point 6 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Ok I have one problem with these kind of laws. How do they prove it was false. This is the whole entire problem with all these allegations, a lot of times they can’t be proven false, just as they can’t be proven true. Thats what makes them so terrible.

[–]RagingHardBull 4 points5 points6 points 6 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Easy: Zach raped me at 9pm on saturday night in my room. Oops, turns out zach was in his house, the girl was her friends house, and there are texts on her phone saying she wants "revenge" on zach for standing her up for a date.

[–]Mcstalker01 2 points3 points4 points 6 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

But thats proof, I have zero issue with that

[–]RagingHardBull 3 points4 points5 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

ALL criminal cases are based on proof the "beyond a reasonable doubt" standard. Nothing in the law could or is trying to avoid the need to meet that standard.

[–]Mcstalker01 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah I understand that, idk what my point is tbh.

[–]UbiquitousWobbegong -1 points0 points1 point 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I'm still on the fence as to whether or not this is beneficial to men. If I was in jail on a false rape allegation, I'd rather my accuser not have any reasons not to tell the truth. If her coming out means she might face charges, then she's less likely to do it, and I'm less likely to be cleared.

I completely understand that punishment is deserved, but so many men are cleared of false accusations by their accusers coming forward. I'd hate to see more falsely accused men having to serve their full sentences just because we had to get a justice boner on.

[–]JaytheVillager 3 points4 points5 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I think that’s balanced out by innocent until proven guilty. Just because the accused is not proven guilty doesn’t necessarily mean the accuser is proven to be lying, but if the accuser knows that she’s lying and thinks there might be enough evidence laying around, where’s the harm in discouraging accusing in the first place.

[–]Bisexual-Bop-It -2 points-1 points0 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Genuine question here: What happens if you were raped, you make an accusation, go to court, and the rapist has an amazing lawyer and you have almost no evidence (cause the only real, solid evidence is a rape kit or video evidence)

Do you go to jail for losing a court case OR does this only apply to cases that have an admission of guilt/clear evidence?

As much as this is a step in the right direction, actual victims of sexual assault or rape shouldnt be afraid to report the crime. I know if I was a victim I wouldnt report it because if the courts fail me then I'm looking at prison time, which would be more damaging than just not telling anyone about it ever. Sometimes the squeeze ain't worth the juice.

[–]viper12a1a -5 points-4 points-3 points 6 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

The main problem i can see with this is if for whatever reason the accuser isn't able to conclusively prove something happened, even if it actually did. I think for this particular law to apply it should be able to be shown that it was a malicious accusation. If so, then i'm ok with it.

[–]tenchineuro 6 points7 points8 points 6 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

The main problem i can see with this is if for whatever reason the accuser isn't able to conclusively prove something happened, even if it actually did. I think for this particular law to apply it should be able to be shown that it was a malicious accusation. If so, then i'm ok with it.

So if a woman makes up a rape to explain why she's late for work (not a hypothetical case) and the police haul in a man matching her description and he gets tried and convicted of rape, you're OK with that because there was no malice and she did not name anyone.

[–]viper12a1a -3 points-2 points-1 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Perhaps instead of "malice" maybe "intentionally false accusation".

I just don't want cases in which maybe something did actually happen and can't be proven in court for whatever reason. We have to ensure any law is applied appropriately and doesn't hurt the legitimately innocent.

[–]tenchineuro 2 points3 points4 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Perhaps instead of "malice" maybe "intentionally false accusation".

If she names no one it's not an accusation, it's a false rape report.

I just don't want cases in which maybe something did actually happen and can't be proven in court for whatever reason.

So you'd not criminalize false rape accusations at all, or set the bar to conviction so high that it could not be surmounted.

We have to ensure any law is applied appropriately and doesn't hurt the legitimately innocent.

Then we need to start with the way rape cases are handled, because they are the only felony where every effort is made to prevent or limit an affirmative defense. But you don't seem at all concerned about that.

[+]orbitaldecayed-23 points 6 years ago* [recovered] (7 children) | Copy Link

Alabama is a third world 'shithole country'. Its incompetent and racist rulers should be made an extremely violent example of. I spent some time there and I've lived in very poor countries in the Middle East. Alabama makes rural Egypt look like London's West End. I feel sorry for anyone who has to live under those conditions. They should send in the US army. Alabama needs liberating. Ive never seen a worse place for children to grow up apart from Gaza.

[–]BulbasaurusThe7th 9 points10 points11 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

You realise you are being stupid and also inciting violence?

[+]orbitaldecayed -9 points-8 points-7 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

yes.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Something tells me that you've either never lived in Alabama, never lived in the Middle East, or you're exaggerating to push an agenda. Maybe all of the above?

[–]KnotHanSolo 4 points5 points6 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah it’s all of the above. The person is trolling.

[–]jcurlee98 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

So I grew up in Alabama. I've been all over the state from it's poorest spots to the richer suburbs on several different in-state mission trips. I've also been overseas to third world countries and whenever I came back home and went on trips to the poor areas, I was always sure to tell them how lucky they are, how lucky almost every American is to not be living in places like that. If you can provide a list of the places you've been to that "need liberation" in Alabama or the racist leaders, I'm more than happy to hear about it. Or if you're just being an entitled little bitch, you can just admit it.

[–]Mindraker -2 points-1 points0 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Alabama makes rural Egypt look like London's West End.

Chuckle Having grown up in Louisiana, this is all too true.

[–]orbitaldecayed -3 points-2 points-1 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Well it's a rhetorical flourish, bu like the best of those, it's also literally true, unfortunately. I find the state of both places to be improveable based on the more favourable general conditions I find my compatriots in.

I would add, for clarity, that those people who choose Alabama as a home and those who discover that this is their fate, take note that... its' not that much better anywhere else. And that other places are almost just as beautiful.

[+]Rex9 -7 points-6 points-5 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Even in Alabama it would be political suicide to pass this bill. It's just a few legislators looking like they're doing something. It'll never pass.

[–]NohoTwoPointOh 5 points6 points7 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

But the sponsors are worth voting for if one lives there...

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter