TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

    • /r/AllPillDebate
    • /r/AlreadyRed
    • /r/altTRP
    • /r/AntiFeminists
    • /r/askFDS
    • /r/askMRP
    • /r/askRPC
    • /r/becomeaman
    • /r/BlackPillScience
    • /r/Chadfish
    • /r/Divorce_Men
    • /r/EverydayMisandry
    • /r/ExRedPill
    • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
    • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
    • /r/GEOTRP
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • /r/MalePsychology
    • /r/Male_Studies
    • /r/MenSupportMen
    • /r/MGTOW2
    • /r/MuslimRedPill
    • /r/newTRP
    • /r/PussyPass
    • /r/PussyPassDenied
    • /r/RedPillBooks
    • /r/RedPillParenting
    • /r/RedPillWives
    • /r/RedPillWomen
    • /r/RedPillWorkplace
    • /r/RPChristians
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/ThankTRP
    • /r/TheRedPillStories
    • /r/trpGAME
    • /r/TRPOffTopic
    • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
    • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

    • Artful Prudence
    • A Voice for Men
    • Alpha Game
    • Black Label Logic
    • Caleb Jones
    • Captain Capitalism
    • Corporate Machiavelli
    • Days of Game
    • Deep Strength
    • Dicipres
    • Donal Graeme
    • Female Misogynist
    • Free Northerner
    • Gaming My Wife
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • In Mala Fide
    • KillToParty
    • Kill Your Inner Loser
    • Krauser PUA
    • LaidNYC
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • NO MA'AM
    • Omega Virgin Revolt
    • Pook's Mill
    • Random Xpat Rantings
    • Red Pill Theory
    • Red Pill Wifery
    • RedPillDad
    • RedPillDoctor
    • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
    • Sigma Frame
    • The Feminine Woman
    • The Futurist
    • The Masculine Principle
    • The Modern Man
    • The New Modern Man
    • The Obsidian Files
    • The Power Moves
    • The Private Man
    • The Red Pill Room
    • The Red Quest
    • The Rules Revisited
    • The Spearhead
    • Troy Francis
    • Wintery Knight
    • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

This University Cleared a Male Student of Rape, Then Re-Tried and Convicted Him Via Insane System

jimrosenz

April 6, 2016
1264 upvotes
/r/MensRights
http://reason.com/blog/2016/04/06/this-university-cleared-a-male-student-o
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title This University Cleared a Male Student of Rape, Then Re-Tried and Convicted Him Via Insane System
Author

jimrosenz

Upvotes 1264
Comments 162
Date April 6, 2016 11:42 AM UTC
(10 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/4dldea/this_university_cleared_a_male_student_of_rape/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/this-university-cleared-a-male-student-of-rape.952458
https://theredarchive.com/post/952458
Top posts by jimrosenz

Timothy Cole died after spending thirteen years in jail for a crime he didn't commit

2126 upvotes
April 8, 2017
/r/MensRights

The Gender Pay Gap is a fashionable myth

1134 upvotes
December 21, 2015
/r/MensRights

Woman who cried rape nine times loses her appeal

901 upvotes
March 29, 2019
/r/MensRights

Wage gap myth exposed — by feminists

481 upvotes
October 2, 2015
/r/MensRights

Students accused of campus sexual assault are now guilty until proved innocent

428 upvotes
March 4, 2017
/r/MensRights

In the age of #MeToo, how do we talk about sexual violence against men?

386 upvotes
February 25, 2018
/r/MensRights

No compensation for man who spent 10 months in jail after false rape accusation

371 upvotes
March 30, 2017
/r/MensRights

Melanie McDonagh: Why International Women's Day is embarrassing

355 upvotes
March 24, 2015
/r/MensRights

Comments

[–]BigBlue615 246 points247 points248 points 10 years ago (18 children) | Copy Link

This story is so typical at this point. Boy meets girl, boy and girl have sex, everything is just fine. Then when the guy sleeps with a different girl, the first girl gets jealous and decides, gasp! "She was raped!"

Fucking sickening that people do this. Not just for ruining this guy's life, but for undermining ACTUAL sexual assault victims.

[–]ANUS_CONE 136 points137 points138 points 10 years ago (17 children) | Copy Link

False rape claims are the #1 thing holding back justice for rape victims. Our problem is that we have no data for that, because the majority of those false claims are not recorded as anything, and end up adding to the statistics of "non-convicted" rapist statistics.

The attitude that I have seen out of our culture, specifically out of females in our culture, is that it's a completely acceptable way to "punish" or "get back at" a man; to accuse him of raping her. My wife and I were at dinner with one of her co-workers who is otherwise a respectable, almost 40-year-old woman - who made a comment about sleeping with a man after her divorce. Someone had mentioned to the man something about her, and she was upset because she didn't want him thinking she was "swooning" over him (he didn't call her back after they hooked up) - so she said "I could have like said he raped me or something, but I didn't even do that - now that bitch goes and says that to him and he thinks i'm all swooning over him!". Something to that degree.

It's a commonplace thing for women in our society. They know that it gives them power. They have the ability to ruin you if you sleep with them and then don't give them what they want. Feminists want to keep it that way, and they want to solidify the sentiment. The incredibly sad part about all of this, is that it's hurting women who are legitimately victims of a brutal crime, because they are enabling and encouraging women to "cry wolf" and sickly abuse the charge.

The real war on women, folks, is a civil war.

[–]BigBlue615 49 points50 points51 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Well said, ANUS_CONE.

[–]Darkling5499 21 points22 points23 points 10 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link

Our problem is that we have no data for that, because the majority of those false claims are not recorded as anything, and end up adding to the statistics of "non-convicted" rapist statistics

adding to statistics involves going to court. since a lot of the false accusers lately (see: Jackie, mattress girl, etc) seem to just tell their story to the public and never go to the police / cooperate with police, the "case" stops there. they're allowed to drag people thru the mud with minimal repercussions (see: Columbia University getting sued - and winning- over Emma Sulkowitz), if any repercussions at all.

[–]Tramm 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago* (11 children) | Copy Link

Who is this "mattress girl" ? I've seen her mentioned like half a dozen times today.

[–]Darkling5499 26 points27 points28 points 10 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

Emma Sulkowicz. Claimed Paul Nungesser raped her, university cleared him (surprisingly). Went around carrying a matress as a performance piece, saying she would do so until he was removed from the college, going as far as carrying it onto the stage when receiving her diploma. turns out, not only did he not rape her, but texts / facebook messages sent by Sulkowitz to Nungesser showed the sex was consentual, and that she was just upset that he had moved on.

edit // she also had a bunch of her friends claim he raped her. turns out, he had rock solid alibis for each event, and in at least one of the cases had never been seen with one of them at all.

[–]cgwriter 14 points15 points16 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

She also shot a simulacrum of said 'rape.' That part... uh, yeah.

[–]mwobuddy 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Even her tits are sad at the whole thing. See how they droop unflatteringly?

[–]Tramm 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Please tell me she was held legally responsible...

[–]Darkling5499 15 points16 points17 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

BWAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAno.

[–]sheevlweeble 8 points9 points10 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Nope. Not even in the least bit. In fact she is still praised in feminist type circles because it's the idea that matters not the facts.

[–]mwobuddy 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

turns out, not only did he not rape her, but texts / facebook messages sent by Sulkowitz to Nungesser showed the sex was consentual, and that she was just upset that he had moved on.

And what governing body forced her to give up her texts?

[–]whythisname 4 points5 points6 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

HE probably released the conversations to show that he was innocent

[–]Darkling5499 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

he submitted them as evidence when he sued the school.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

She was also invited by New York state senator Kirsten Gillibrand to the State of the Union. :

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/gillibrand-defends-activist-critics-calling-fake-article-1.2086128

Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.) (left) invited Emma Sulkowicz to the State of the Union in an effort to highlight a bipartisan bill that would force colleges to step up collection of information on sexual assaults and adopt tougher, standardized processes for dealing with sexual assault.

[–]mwobuddy 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Or to get back at him by attacking his genitals. That is also okay.

[–]unbelievablepeople 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

They have the ability to ruin you if you sleep with them

They also have the ability to ruin you if you don't sleep with them. Trials like this one rarely if ever include physical evidence, so there doesn't even have to be sex. The woman can simply say there was sex without consent, and the man is then asked to prove a negative.

[–]ulpisen -1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

False rape claims are the #1 thing holding back justice for rape victims.

I disagree, even if the false rape claims were 1 / 100 000 000 it would still be immoral to convict people without sufficient evidence, and by the nature of the crime it will always be difficult to get evidence in most cases

[–]RunawayGrain 186 points187 points188 points 10 years ago (58 children) | Copy Link

It's like the old Soviet system where they would rig the trial as much as necessary to come to the 'correct' decision.

[–][deleted] 49 points50 points51 points 10 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

Or like the Cardassian system where the court has concluded your guilt and sentence beforehand and the trial is just there to show how they so expertly concluded you were guilty and why you deserve your sentence, which usually tends to be a) labor camps or b) public execution.

[–]ComaToys 16 points17 points18 points 10 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

Upvote for the future and security of Cardassia!

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points9 points 10 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

I do all things for the good of Cardassia!

[–]ComaToys 4 points5 points6 points 10 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

The Obsidian Order has ensured our loyalty!

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

I don't sense enough enthusiasm in your voice comrade.

You have been randomly selected for additional "education".

[–]ComaToys 7 points8 points9 points 10 years ago* (3 children) | Copy Link

I was broken and secretly harboring feelings of disloyalty, even guilt. But now I am fixed, and I can see as many lights as instructed.

Edit: I am not worthy of this gilding, kind and anonymous Legate. This is the highest honor I could have hoped to achieve by being a dork.

[–]vakeraj 4 points5 points6 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Oh man, nothing like a good DS9/TNG thread in r/MRA.

[–]flyingwolf 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

There are three lights!

[–]mwobuddy 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Five or four. Time for another pain lesson.

[–]Orgell_Evaan 23 points24 points25 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Current Italian system, too, from what I've seen.

[–]IronWolve 57 points58 points59 points 10 years ago (45 children) | Copy Link

Happens in American courts too, judges refuses to admit evidence, judges approve or deny the defendants arguments (like self defense or innocent), tells the jury how to vote, they can cherry pick laws to enforce or deny.

There is a reason US courts have a 93% conviction rate, system is stacked against the poor and innocent.

[–]Drmadanthonywayne 56 points57 points58 points 10 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

No actual American court is anywhere near as bad as what happened to this guy. Even in the first "trial" that exonerated him, he wasn't even allowed to have a copy of the charges against him! Then, the girl appeals the exoneration (double jeopardy), and he's not even allowed to appear at the hearing! Plus, the girl who testified in his defense isn't even called to testify at the new hearing.

[–]flyingwolf 10 points11 points12 points 10 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

My wife and I are currently fighting a theft and felony assault case against her.

She walked out of a store with merchandise, innocent mistake, it fell behind a diaper bag. Once confronted she handed the items back, apologized, and assumed that was it, next thing she knows the security lady is grabbing her, putting her in a rear naked choke while hanging on her back and eventually they end up on the ground. 1 month after my wife had back surgery.

This was in Jan of 2014. She was convicted, we were never allowed to read the statements of the security guard or witnesses, so we could not rebutt them. We were told a jury trial was an impossibility and that it would cost another 5k we didn't have. So we went with a bench trial, we were assigned a 1st time judge who was an absolute shithead and had already decided she was guilty the second we walked in.

Now here we are, 2 years later, paying the minimum on her restitution, with interest so high that the amount actually keeps going up each month. It will never be paid in full, ever.

The courts offered her all kinds of plea bargains and deals, she refused all of them on the grounds that she was innocent, had cell phone video to prove she was not fighting and wanted her day in court.

The judge told her he was sentencing her because she wasted the court's time with her nonsense.

That nonsense of course being actually wanting a fair trial instead of pleading guilty to something she didn't do.

You may think that american courts can't be fucked up, I am here to tell you, they certainly can be.

[–]mwobuddy 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Once confronted she handed the items back, apologized, and assumed that was it, next thing she knows the security lady is grabbing her, putting her in a rear naked choke while hanging on her back and eventually they end up on the ground. 1

This is why it should be okay to punch the shit out of idiots.

[–]flyingwolf 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I wish, I fought a long time in my head to break my years of pacifism to go choke that cunt to death.

The fucked up part, I have taught my wife LINE, she could have easily disabled/killed that woman, instead she provided passive resistance, pulled out her phone and asked her to let her go. The woman then wrenched on her back until she fell to the ground in pain, still has a fucked up back to this day, surgery was bassically wasted.

[–]Funcuz 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I'd like to see that evidence if you've got it uploaded anywhere.

[–]flyingwolf 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I have linked the video a couple of times and I did a whole write up over at legaladvice.

But as we are now in appeals I have the information down.

Funny thing, just this past Tuesday I finally received the copy of the police, security guard and witness statements, over 2 years since I requested them. I got them via email. It was a 30 second transaction but took 2 years to get them.

And the statements are absolutely riddled with inconsistencies and outright easily provable lies based on the video evidence we have.

[–]IronWolve 13 points14 points15 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Wait, what? I'd say family courts not allowing fathers to see their children, making men homeless, putting them in jail when unemployed, etc, the list goes on. How about non violent drug users and courts making them felons!

IS JUST AS BAD, Its worse. This guy gets fucked for 5 years, some people are fucked for life.

[–]comehitherhitler 22 points23 points24 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

One of you is discussing due process and one is discussing outcomes.

[–]FerretHydrocodone 5 points6 points7 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

It can definitely be that bad in the U.S. Many of the prisoners at Guantanamo can be in the same situation. Their lawyers/defenders often don't know any of their clients charges because it's confidential, often the accused doesn't know their charges either. They are often held for years before they are even charged with a crime, in addition. Some of these people are even US citizens with no connection to terrorist groups what so ever. Things can be much worse in the U.S., depending on who you are.

[–]speedisavirus -2 points-1 points0 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

One Guantanamo is not representative of the Justice system. Two there is almost nobody there anymore.

[–]AFuddyDuddy 18 points19 points20 points 10 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

This isn't the US legal system at work. These are kangaroo courts colleges have started having.

Many have already been sued over them. Yet, most continue to punish young men based on a simple accusation, which is often found to be false.

Why we allow these, baffles me. These claims need to be are to a court of LAW. Not a court of SJW administrators

[–]IronWolve -2 points-1 points0 points 10 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

I was replying to Runawaygrains statement about russian courts, and how american courts are the same.

[–]whoizz -2 points-1 points0 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Obviously, but his point is that the article has nothing to do with the American system of justice and it most definitely should.

[–]IronWolve 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

He replied to me! I replied to him! Its not a top comment.

[–]whoizz 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Again, no shit sherlock. It's called a conversation.

[–]speedisavirus -2 points-1 points0 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

US courts are infinitely better and less corrupt than Russian courts.

[–]DrDoSoLittle 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

And that is why unless I am convinced beyond a shadow of a doubt that a person is guilty, and that their punishment will be commensurate to their crime, I vote not guilty.

[–]mwobuddy 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That's not the justice system. It has always been about "how much evidence is needed to show that they must be the one".

There's still factors that can't be planned for, like planted evidence, or victim manipulation of evidence to point to a certain person, etc.

[–]speedisavirus -1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago (25 children) | Copy Link

Source. Highly improbable that the courts have a 93% overall conviction rate in the US.

[–]IronWolve -3 points-2 points-1 points 10 years ago (24 children) | Copy Link

Google, first result.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conviction_rate

[–]speedisavirus 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (23 children) | Copy Link

The justice department != all courts. If you took a second to even read that then you would see it absolutely has to be below 93% because every other high rate state listed is significantly below 93% and the state courts process far more cases than the justice department.

[–]IronWolve -3 points-2 points-1 points 10 years ago (22 children) | Copy Link

You like to argue don't you.

[–]speedisavirus 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (21 children) | Copy Link

You like to spread misinformation don't you

[–]IronWolve -1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago (20 children) | Copy Link

Instead of supplying a counter argument or offer an opinion you just want to bitch and moan. Throw more accusations too, prove how mentally stable you are.

[–]speedisavirus 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (19 children) | Copy Link

I didn't bitch and moan. I called you on your lies

[–]IronWolve -1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago (18 children) | Copy Link

Not a lie, I provided proof, cry more.

[–]WaitingToBeBanned 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Even the Soviets were not that bad.

[–]speedisavirus 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Or how Russia still works.

[–]MeiFriend 43 points44 points45 points 10 years ago (17 children) | Copy Link

Is this going to get to a point where men won't have sex until marriage because of the dangers?

...Except, we aren't going to get married either.

[–][deleted] 18 points19 points20 points 10 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link

That, or you could just hide cameras and audio recorders around the room.

"HE RAPED ME"

"My video and audio says otherwise lol"

[–]bdash1990 11 points12 points13 points 10 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Those things will not prove she wasn't "drunk" or anything else. She could still easily claim it.

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points9 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Well in this specific case, I agree it wouldn't prove that she wasn't drunk. This would be in situations where she regretted it after the fact and decided to claim rape.

[–]bdash1990 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yes, it is possible that it would cut down on those.

[–]dem_banka 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Do I need a breathalyzer in my goodies drawer?!?

[–]mwobuddy 4 points5 points6 points 10 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Do you know that women want to make secret video recordings of sex a prisonable offense?

Its already a tort in many places, where they can sue in civil for damages, but they actually want it to be in criminal law.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

That's such bullshit. Not the suing part, but it being a prisonable offense? Jesus.

I'd honestly rather have video evidence to protect myself against potential rape claims.

Do you by chance have any articles on this?

[–]mwobuddy 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/2878290/Beeb-man-made-secret-sex-tape.html

Here's someone sent to jail for 8 months when he wasn't even showing the sex tapes to others.

http://www.courtroomstrategy.com/2013/12/ny-court-rules-it-is-illegal-to-secretly-tape-consensual-sex/

This case can have great implications in NY. NY is currently debating whether to adopt a “Revenge Porn Law” similar to ones passed in New Jersey and California which make it illegal to post sexual videos on the internet without all parties’ consent. This case now holds that if the persons on the video did not all consent to being taped, the videographer cannot make use of the footage without exposing himself to criminal liability. Furthermore, a previously consenting partner can now claim that on consent was given and cause the arrest of the other partner if the other partner is the one who shot the video. Folks engaged in this now-common activity would be wise to make sure that the t ape consistently shows the consent of all involved throughout the entire recording.

What will happen is that women will counter in court under revenge porn laws in states where it is illegal.

NY video surveillance law was enacted after a series of cases involving landlords secretly taping their tenants or guests resulted in no convictions because there was no expectation of privacy in another person’s property. At the time of its passage, then Governor George Pataki issued a statement which now accompanies the law:

“Women throughout…New York State have unknowingly been videotaped while engaging in sexual relations. Several women in this category have attempted to file complaints alleging that their partner made these videotapes without their knowledge or permission and are now even posting the video footage on the Internet. These women were turned away without a remedy.”

The statute reads as follows: A person is guilty of unlawful surveillance in the second degree when:

  1. For his or her own, or another person’s amusement, entertainment, or profit, or for the purpose of degrading or abusing a person, he or she intentionally uses or installs…an imaging device to surreptitiously view, broadcast or record a person dressing or undressing or the sexual or other intimate parts of such person at a place and time when such person has a reasonable expectation of privacy, without such person’s knowledge or consent; or

  2. For his or her own, or another person’s sexual arousal or sexual gratification, he or she intentionally uses or installs…an imaging device to surreptitiously view, broadcast or record a person dressing or undressing or the sexual or other intimate parts of such person at a place and time when such person has a reasonable expectation of privacy, without such person’s knowledge or consent; or

You'll say "I do this for self protection". They'll say "you can't record any woman on the suspicion that she might falsely accuse, we're proceeding with this as if you broke this statute about recording someone for your own personal pleasure without their consent".

What it will look like is that she's a victim saying you raped her, and now you're admitting that you also secretly taped her having sex with you at one point in your relationship with her.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That's what it'll look like, but that'll be up to the judge to decide.

Under California’s new law, revenge porn is a misdemeanor, punishable by up to six months in jail, a fine of up to $1,000, or both.

To be honest, I'd rather that than being labeled as a rapist and sentenced to more jail time simply because some crazy woman decided to cry wolf.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

So either way I'm fucked! Sweeeeeeeet -_-

[–]dem_banka 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

How about audio?

[–]torik0 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I knew Dennis was onto something there.

[–]wzil 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Hey look at this shitlord telling a rape victim how they should have acted before, during, and after a rape for their rape to count!

Feminist already are a step ahead of you.

[–]Spicy_Shart 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This is illegal in some states due to wiretapping laws (e.g. you need both parties to consent before filming)

[–]derpylord143 7 points8 points9 points 10 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

thats pretty much it, haha. Oh and if we do get married we would have legal contracts or prenups i suppose, (they are becoming more frequently used in the uk but they dont have to be, but as long as they dont go contrary to equity and other principles or Section 25 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 then they are usually used. this is why i think we need actual contracts not "prenuptial agreements" so that they are always bloody binding. we dont make them so that they are thrown away for heavens sake, both parties AGREE to them, regardless of how bad the terms are -.-)

[–]moration 6 points7 points8 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

now that triggered me

[–]ElMorono 31 points32 points33 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Jesus fuck. What a nightmare.

There needs to be some sort of slush fund setup for people who are accused of this shit. I hope he wins big. Fuck this school.

[–]bufedad 13 points14 points15 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Actually, this might be a good investment opportunity.

Think about it.

If you invest X amount towards this lawsuit, you are guaranteed X% of the payout.

I can see this being a good investment opportunity, and allow victims of false rape accusation to get justice.

[–]AtemAndrew 43 points44 points45 points 10 years ago (15 children) | Copy Link

Well they aren't giving men the right to fair trial, I'm not surprised that they're ignoring Double Jeopardy as well.

[–]CornyHoosier 16 points17 points18 points 10 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link

It's terrifying.

At this point I'd be leery of going to college at all as a man.

[–]AtemAndrew 21 points22 points23 points 10 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Especially due to the costs... seeing as we aren't given millions of advantages and help.

Cost vs Reward.

[–]CornyHoosier 14 points15 points16 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I 100% agree. It's why we're seeing marriage rates plummet as well ... the payoff ain't worth it

[–]AtemAndrew 6 points7 points8 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Both literally and metaphorically.

[–]mwobuddy 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

And if you dont have a college degree, women wont marry you because you're not a viable man.

So I guess not going to college works out for everyone.

Just remember when people come asking why you men aren't going to college, tell them false rape accusations, feminism and unfair sexual assault standards, and not wanting to be seen as a viable partner for marriage for college educated women. After all, those very same women have been indoctrinated by college life to see men as either someone to use or a potential rapist.

[–]Lethn 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

I'm already avoiding it mainly on this basis, nevermind how shit the whole education system is in general I have to worry about getting accused of rape and sexual assault on top of getting the most out of a degree? Fuck that!

Meanwhile while everyone is getting fucked over in universities, I'm busy learning about serialization and saving gameobject data so I can have no problem finishing my games and all while sitting in the comfort of my own home without worrying about some nutter losing her shit and pointing fingers at me :D

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TdWNJFuSboQ&nohtml5=False

Yey internet!

[–]torik0 -1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Can't get wrongly accused if you don't sleep with anyone.

[–]DevilishRogue 16 points17 points18 points 10 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Yes you can. You can get wrongly accused if you haven't ever even met the person, let alone slept with them.

[–]torik0 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

D-don't talk to anyone? Don't leave home? Don't exist?!

[–]DevilishRogue 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Always be recording.

[–]Backstrom -2 points-1 points0 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

You're going to need to source a ridiculous statement like that.

[–]mwobuddy 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Im currently accusing you of rape, despite never having met you.

It might not go anywhere, but I am accusing you.

http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2016/apr/05/girl-13-lied-about-park-sex-attack-say-greater-manchester-police

[–]Mitschu 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/man-freed-imprisoned-28-years-dream-rape-claim-article-1.2474475

He spent 28 years in prison because she had a dream that he raped her, and reported that dream to the police.

[–]Alkomb 4 points5 points6 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Woman privilege.

[–]ChaosOpen 86 points87 points88 points 10 years ago (21 children) | Copy Link

The retrial itself is unconstitutional. No matter what "new evidence" comes up, the person cannot be retried after being found not guilty.

[–]Lance_lake 34 points35 points36 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I once went through this kind of trial (not for rape, for something else). I hired a lawyer and all and when the date came up, I was told that even though all the "evidence" was hearsay, it was valid and I couldn't argue against it. It was not even trying to pretend it was fair.

[–]Darkling5499 27 points28 points29 points 10 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

double jeopardy only applies to government courts.

[–]locks_are_paranoid 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This is one of the many reason why private tribunals are unfair.

[–]pigi5 6 points7 points8 points 10 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

I don't get that. It's a public school and it's a constitutional right (5th amendment). What gives them the right to take away those fundamental rights?

[–]stemgang 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Public school means different things depending on context.

Sure, there is only 1 college in the country that doesn't accept federal financial aid, but don't let that influence us...

For purposes of squelching public expressions of religion, all schools that receive government funding are part of the government...

However, for purposes of administering sexual revenge and holding kangaroo courts, there is no such thing as a government school. Each institution is free to set up its own tribunals and make up any rules they prefer.

[–]Schadrach 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You have it wrong. Because it's a government school it must abide by title IX. Title IX sets the lowered evidence standard for sexual assault hearing, and as they are not criminal cases the rights of the accused are not guaranteed.

I still think the right answer when a consensual sex act becomes a rape accusation is to make the same accusation right back. If they don't treat you equally, threaten to sue on title IX using the hearings themselves as evidence. Accept settlement but only if it includes wiping the accusation from your record, use it to attend a better college. Repeat as necessary until graduating from somewhere nice.

[–]Darkling5499 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

because the punishment isn't imprisonment, i guess.

[–]IronWolve 16 points17 points18 points 10 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

Thats if you assume the college investigation meets the definition of court. And if you cant defend yourself, and the people are not impartial, then its clearly not a court. Also, its not a court of law by any means.

[–]ChaosOpen 14 points15 points16 points 10 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

Rape however, is not something the college should be handling, rape is a federal offense offense. Universities are not a country unto themselves, they should defer all criminal offenses to the authorities. The college campus would not internally handle murder, it even defers to the police over a traffic accident, so why is rape handled internally instead of being reported to the police?

Basically, all handing it internally does is allow the rapist to get off scott free. Instead of going to jail he simply walks off campus a free man, no string attached, no further consequences.

[+][deleted] 10 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]ChaosOpen 6 points7 points8 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You think they'd treat a female rapist like this? Do you think they would even have a hearing? They would just have a hearty laugh before telling the student to go back to class or be expelled if he continues to try and make such serious accusations against his master.

[–]SaucyWiggles 3 points4 points5 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

he

[–]Schadrach 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Of course it's the domain of the police and criminal courts. The college system doesn't preclude actual law enforcement. On the upside, however small, the range of punishment available to the college is very small.

One could argue that forcing colleges to require a lowered standard of evidence is done specifically to make a police investigation less valuable as defense evidence.

[–]idontcareifyouburyme -2 points-1 points0 points 10 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

The reason schools investigate rape is because there is a student conduct code to which students must afhere. I'm sure there's another rule prohibiting murder. For example, see page 11 of UCLA's SCC: http://www.deanofstudents.ucla.edu/Portals/16/Documents/UCLACodeOfConduct_Rev030416.pdf

[–]ndstumme 3 points4 points5 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Cool. If he is convicted of the crime of rape or murder, then sure, expel him. Do the schools hold their own murder trials instead of going to the police like they do with rape?

[–]idontcareifyouburyme 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Depends on the procedures. Those may also be able to be found in the manual.

[–]mwobuddy -1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Rape or murder on schoolgrounds isn't actual criminal rape or murder, or something.

[–]Flatline334 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Sad thing is this isn't considered a trial even though that is exactly what it is.

[–]HaveRegrets 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

No it's not. This is not a legal trial.. The University Court is not a court of law.

This is more like a civil trial. As you don't get 5 yrs suspension for rape in the legal system. You get jail and put on a list.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm pretty sure they aren't considered courts of law which is what allows them to circumvent our rights. Colleges look out for their reputation more so than any student.

[–]CornyHoosier 15 points16 points17 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

It's too bad that this is only seen on this sub-reddit.

[–]redditorriot 15 points16 points17 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Post it elsewhere.

Report back on where it gets removed from.

[–]Leinadro 16 points17 points18 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

This is a fucking nightmare. If I didnt know better I would swear that the accuser had some friends in high places in that school who basically abused the system to favor her.

[–]Lethn 10 points11 points12 points 10 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

In some cases that's completely true, the Gregory Elliot case in Canada being a prime example, the feminist who made the accusation did actually have friends higher up and even had contacts in the police.

You think when looking at this shit "Oh it might well just be one case of a crazy person being taken seriously" but no, the further you dig on all of this the more disturbing it is, these women who do this have so many connections it's unreal. While some of them are acting on their own they certainly take advantage of any connections women's groups and feminist groups have in order to screw men over so unfortunately it is a literal conspiracy.

[–]mwobuddy 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Here's a G.E. link.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2m9t1_1ly10

Basically, they're all trying to give each other jobs by false accusations, since actual crime is dropping like a rock.

Yes women, that even includes the crimes of sexual assault and rape.

[–][deleted] 17 points18 points19 points 10 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

feminists destroying the idea of romance, one false rape accusation at a time

[–]Alkomb 4 points5 points6 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Ha, yeah.:\

[–]Youre-In-Trouble 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Where are all the good men?

[–]SKNK_Monk 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

With the good women. If none are available, with the internet.

[–][deleted] 10 points11 points12 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Why are these not handed off to the authorities in the first place. A school has no business investigating a crime. If the guy is found guilty, the school can then decide how to proceed with his enrolment; if he's found not guilty, or no charges are filed, then the school does nothing...other than hold a disciplinary hearing about the false allegation.

It is possible for there to be evidence that an assault occured, without there being enough evidence to procede against an individual. In that case I would assume that nobody suffers disciplinary action.

[–]Sourdust2 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

This x1000. There is also the caveant that the woman HAS to take it to court and pursue college.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

There should have to be a police report

[–][deleted] 9 points10 points11 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Just so people understand the legal framework here. At a public school, a student has a property right in their education. That right cannot be deprived without due process of law. That is what these lawsuits are about--whether public universities are depriving male student of their right to an education without due process. The "re-trial" here was an administrative appeal not a "new trial."

Before people rape me in the comments, I am not at all defending the practices here. In fact, I am involved in 2 of these lawsuits on behalf of clients. But the comments here show a major misunderstanding of how these proceedings work.

[–]TacoNinjaSkills 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

At a public school, a student has a property right in their education. That right cannot be deprived without due process of law. That is what these lawsuits are about--whether public universities are depriving male student of their right to an education without due process.

This is a good counter to the "University isn't government so it can do whatever it wants and sucks to be you" people. They exist.

[–]DillipFayKick 5 points6 points7 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I am glad I am not a young man any more and I'm done with college. College aged guys out there: Take care of yourselves, finish school, come up with a life plan, get good grades, and stay away from women as much as you can.

[–]redditorriot 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Utterly disgusting and frankly horrendously scary. This is tyranny.

Hope he sues the living daylights out of the university, and it's given national press.

[–]redditorriot 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Right now, the best reaction to a false accusation seems to be an immediate counter accusation of rape.

If no real evidence is required, what's to lose?

[–]bfwilley 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Guilty by accusation.

[+][deleted] 10 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[+][deleted] 10 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[+][deleted] 10 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[+][deleted] 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]mwobuddy 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

The police talked to me and my boyfriend, agreed that there was no evidence, and the dumb bitch got laughed at by our circle of friends.

You mean, nothing bad happened to her?

[–]Schadrach 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Can you prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, that she was not raped at all? Not just not by the accused, but by anyone in any situation that might be vaguely tied to the events? After all, she might just have misidentified her rapist and gotten the time and place mixed up.

I wish I was being less serious than I am. But just look at a car like the Tracy West case. It's physically impossible for the accused to have committed the rape, but it's not a false accusation because you can't prove that nothing happened to her at all.

[–]mwobuddy 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Prove a teacup isn't floating in space between the Sun and the Earth.

[–]Schadrach 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Exactly.

But that's how it's counted. Since there's no proof that no rape occurred to her at all, it's not a false accusation by most metrics. That's one of the main reasons the rate of false accusations is so small.

[–]TacoNinjaSkills 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Well......http://reason.com/blog/2016/04/01/judge-sides-with-gay-brandeis-student-gu

[–]Mustaka 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I watched a documentary yesterday called "The Hunting Grounds". It was screened about the same time I started a sub here called /r/pussypassdenied. A sub I started as a joke response to some comment I have long forgotten. Circa mid to late 2014.

In my tenure of being a PPD mod I have watched it become massivly popular and hated, depends where on the feminist spectrum you sit. I am well past university age and do not know anyone personally that is so polar on being a sexist either way but the number of stories I see day in and day out is just scary sad.

A very big chunk of the target people in the documentary have since been proven, 'liar liar pants on fire'. The only reason I have even the slightest clue on any of it is because I modded hundreds if not thousands of posts on a very big chunk of the situations covered in the documentary.

My opinion is fuck rapists regardless of gender. However one of the points raised in the documentary which I whole hearted agree with is that Universities are employers. The kangaroo courts they use need to go.

[–]gsettle 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

University should have its accreditation suspended for five years for this sort of sexist BS. Plus all the admins involved should be fired along with their legal council.

[–]589547521563 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It is simple. Males should be taught not to engage in sexual activities with females until their degree is finished. Avoid sexual encounters. Sex is good and all, but not being thrown out on a whim is even better.

[+][deleted] 10 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]unbelievablepeople 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

OK, but then the college would expel you. If you're a 20-year-old who has already taken out tens of thousands of dollars in student loans and has no clue how to get a job without a college degree, an expulsion can really fuck up the rest of your life. That's why these guys feel like they have no choice but to go along with this inherently unfair process.

[+][deleted] 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]unbelievablepeople 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yes. At a lot of colleges, refusal to participate in their disciplinary kangaroo courts is grounds for expulsion.

[–]jharden77441 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I find it insane that private or non judicial public bodies have the ability to run such proceedings on criminal matters. Is that not why we have a court system. Rape is terrible, but it isn't just rape that this shit happens on campus with. Get caught drinking under age and a state court clears you of the crime. Well you still have to deal with universities bull shit because you were accused in the first place. I experienced this first hand. Got caught standing near a bottle of vodka (not drinking yet as I just arrived), got charged uneraged possession, went to court and got it dismissed because not a single person was breathalyzed, university still expects me to do the work as if I was actually guilty.

[–]YahooYoshi 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

This kind of story makes me hate that my parents are making me stay in a dorm and not off campus...

[–]Maschalismos 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Why? It ups the number of witnesses for every social encounter. Just don't let any women into your room. Ever.

[–]YahooYoshi 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

But I don't want to walk out of my dorm and have some girl I haven't met accuse me of rape. This rape culture shit is so fucked up.

[–]WhoIsHarlequin 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

James Madison would be ashamed

[–]repete66219 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Universities are in a bind. On one hand, you have the entire circus atmosphere in which academics and students advocate for ideas that would never survive the scrutiny of the real world and on the other you have over-reaching Title IX recommendations from the federal government. They have no choice but to over-estimate & force the courts to decide through lawsuits.

[–]yourhatredfeedsme 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Isn't this, I dunno, the very definition of double-jeopardy?

[–]speedisavirus 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If it was a real Corey court, yeah

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Crazy.

[–]MeEvilBob 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This reminds me of the witch trial in Monty Python and the Holy Grail. If the woman weighs as much as a duck, she is therefore a witch, so put them both on the scale and keep adding rocks to the duck's basket until they both weigh the same.

They looked at his evidence like Christians look at the bible, just enough to acknowledge it exists, any more and you have to start paying attention.

[–]Blix- 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Title 9'needs to be abolished

[–]Schadrach 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It could be saved easily enough. The original text and goal isn't bad, it's just the ways they've defined "discrimination" and the remedies they've assigned for it that are the problem.

[–]TechnoSam_Belpois 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Isn't that double jeopardy? Which is illegal, right? This should be an open and shut case if the accused sued.

[+]MehateRape -7 points-6 points-5 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

False accusation? That's a crock of shit and you know it. He was CONVICTED fair and square. He raped her and got 2 hearings his due process. How come nobody feels bad for the girl that got raped and you're more concerned about some stupid racist getting only a 5 year suspension from school?

[–]gsettle 4 points5 points6 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Really? Acquitted and then tried again in a Kangaroo Court and you think that's fair. You have less than no knowledge of the law! You belong to the "Sentence first, trial afterwords" crowd.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter