What I have recently found to be extremely fascinating is the modern left’s love of the “incel” slur. Oh, they’ll bleat on endlessly about how men need to “stop suppressing their feelings” and “be open about their emotions”, but simply try this: go on any forum where it’s been normalised and say, as politely and earnestly as you can, that you find the word “incel” to be emotionally bothering , because you’re single and are insecure about it, and you would appreciate if people could use it a little less. Be VERY careful to say ONLY this, don’t make any other claims or say anything that could be interpreted differently.

​

If you do this,regardless of where this is; then expect the same phrases and claims to be vomited out at you. For instance, they will simply reply ”Women don’t owe you sex” even though you never said, or even slightly implied, that they did. “Incel is a self-identifier only being used by a misogynist, so if the word makes you upset, you’re a misogynist“, “I doubt your sincerity”,”if you identify as an incel I have a problem with you!” “Assbrained virtue signalling”, “facts don’t care about your feelings”…these are all quotes you will get from these people on the “left” that care oh so much about men not repressing their emotions.

Now, we must ask, why is it that this has been so normalised? Women don’t really fight against the “incel” slur, for the most part, because they aren’t hugely affected by it. But what about men? If men on the left actually cared about this, they could stop it. The reason is, of course, that men don’t care about it because the majority of men are or have been in some kind of relationship.

So of course, the left keeps chugging along happily, laughing at and spitting on these “incels”, not giving a damn because they’re just a statistical minority and don’t affect things, so who cares? Who cares if we bully these people into the hands of the right? There aren’t many of them!

Except, this group is steadily growing. 30-40% of men under 30 are single, and marriage rates are decreasing. This means, the more single men are alienated by the left, the worse this problem is getting, and the more help the right gets. This isn’t even me speculating: a paper studying this said “Singleness may also mean that men have been able to retain a greater portion of their income and, consequently, have been more likely to turn to the party that most aims to protect high income earners and their property: The Republican Party.” (https://digitalcommons.providence.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1054&context=sbg)

By creating a world where men are not getting into relationships and not getting married, the resources and feed for the right will only grow:if you want a vision of the future of the left, look at this:

Imagine a man, sitting on a chair. This man has a cut in his arm, drops of blood fall from this arm and into the mouth of a serpent, which swells the more blood it gets. Somebody says “Hey, you’re bleeding and that snake is growing bigger!” He turns around, with aggression “Hey! You’re talking about blood! Only snakes care about blood! You must be a snake!” And so the blood drips continue, into a floor, they gush into the snake‘s mouth. And when the man realises, too late; that the the snake is larger than he is and he is so very weak, it is no use.